pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23305 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

gateau: an observation simulator for ground-based submillimeter astronomy with integral field units and kinetic inductance detectors

A. Moerman , N. Soshnin , S. A. Brackenhoff , S. O. Dabironezare , K. Karatsu , L. H. Marting , S. A. H. de Rooij , M. Roos
show 2 more authors
B. R. Brandl A. Endo
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 06:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords submillimeter astronomyintegral field unitskinetic inductance detectorsobservation simulatoratmospheric noisedetector noisetime-ordered dataGPU acceleration
0
0 comments X

The pith

A new open-source simulator accurately reproduces real submillimeter observations with kinetic inductance detectors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents gateau as a modular simulator that takes astronomical sources, atmospheric conditions, scan patterns, and instrument parameters to generate time-ordered detector data for submillimeter integral field unit observations. It incorporates a physically motivated photon-noise model for white noise and temporally correlated pink noise for detector effects, then outputs datasets suitable for testing data pipelines. Validation against actual measurements from an existing instrument shows that the simulator reproduces observed signals from the atmosphere and from Uranus. This capability matters because it lets researchers evaluate observation strategies and instrument designs through simulation before using scarce telescope time on faint targets like galaxies and large-scale structures. The code runs efficiently on GPUs, so long observations can be modeled far faster than they would take in reality.

Core claim

The paper claims that gateau provides a complete, GPU-accelerated simulation chain for submm IFU observations that incorporates realistic propagation of source signals through the atmosphere and instrument, adds photon noise and pink detector noise, and produces time-ordered data whose statistical properties match those measured in real observations with DESHIMA 2.0 of both atmospheric emission and the planet Uranus.

What carries the argument

The gateau simulator itself, which propagates an input source through user-specified atmospheric screens and telescope parameters to the detector array before overlaying white photon noise and temporally correlated pink noise to create realistic time-ordered datasets.

If this is right

  • Observation strategies and scan patterns can be optimized in simulation before telescope time is allocated.
  • Data-reduction pipelines can be developed and tested on large volumes of realistic synthetic data.
  • Instrument parameters can be adjusted iteratively to predict performance on faint extended sources such as galaxies.
  • Long-duration surveys become feasible to model in minutes rather than days, allowing rapid iteration on experimental design.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same framework could be extended to forecast sensitivity for detecting weak spectral lines in high-redshift galaxies.
  • Simulated datasets might help quantify how scan strategy choices reduce residual atmospheric contamination after data processing.
  • Community users could adapt the modular code to other submillimeter instruments or wavelengths without starting from scratch.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen photon-noise model plus the addition of pink noise fully captures the actual noise behavior of kinetic inductance detectors and the atmosphere during real submillimeter observations.

What would settle it

Systematic differences between the simulated and measured power spectra or signal-to-noise ratios in new, independent observations from a similar kinetic-inductance-detector instrument would show that the noise model does not match reality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23305 by A. Endo, A. Moerman, B. R. Brandl, K. Karatsu, L. H. Marting, M. Roos, N. Soshnin, S. A. Brackenhoff, S. A. H. de Rooij, S. O. Dabironezare.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Graphical overview of a gateau simulation. The telescope scans the source and atmosphere screen. The source is depicted as multiple images, highlighting the spectral nature. The atmosphere screen is trans￾lated across the telescope beam with a constant windspeed, which is illustrated using the two arrows. After entering the telescope, the sky signal is propagated through the radiative transfer cascade and … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example TODs and Pxx for two channels, about 100 GHz apart, obtained with DESHIMA 2.0 and simulated with gateau. Top row: average-subtracted brightness temperature ∆Tb, as function of time. Bottom row: Pxx of the time series in the top row. Left column: channel at 250.54 GHz. Right column: channel at 349.18 GHz. throughout this section, Pxx refers to the total power spectral density. This includes atmosphe… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Per-channel power spectral density ratio Pˆ meas xx /Pˆ sim xx , as function of rebinned fxx. The average APEX PWV during the observation was 0.9 mm. The ratio for each channel is color-coded to highlight the inde￾pendence of the scatter of the ratio on channel frequency. The median per fxx bin, across all channels, is illustrated as a red dashed line. For visual purposes, the horizontal black dash-dotted … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of a DESHIMA 2.0 observation of Uranus with a gateau simulation. Left panel: spectra extracted from the maps. The location in the maps was selected by picking the brightest pixel in the averaged flux density maps. The errorbars correspond to the 1-σ standard error. We also show ηatm,z with PWV=0.6 mm as the grey dashed line to illustrate the atmospheric absorption peak and transmission windows. … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Overview of some results of the example use case. Left panel: averaged spectrum extracted from the created maps. The Fν for each channel was obtained by averaging over a 60′′ radius aperture centered on the cluster center. The errorbars are at 1-σ standard error. For illustration, we also show the ηatm,z for PWV=0.8 mm as the dashed grey curve, in order to highlight the atmospheric absorption and transmiss… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Submillimeter (submm) integral field units (IFUs) utilising kinetic inductance detectors (KIDs) are a promising instrument architecture for the study of galaxies, galaxy clusters, and the large-scale structure of the Universe. In order to design successful experiments targeting these science cases, several aspects such as instrument design, observation and calibration strategies, and data reduction pipelines must be collectively developed, tested, and optimised. This can be achieved through end-to-end simulations of the experiment, allowing for quantitative assessment of the aforementioned aspects. To this end, we have developed gateau, a modular, flexible, and efficient simulator for submm IFU observations of astronomical sources. The simulator consists of a Python interface, powered by a C/C++ backend that uses CUDA for GPU-acceleration, and is publicly available and fully open-source. gateau simulates observations by taking user input such as an astronomical source, a set of atmospheric screens, a scan pattern, and telescope and instrument parameters. It then propagates the source signal to the detectors. A physically motivated photon-noise model is used to add a white noise component to the received power. Detector noise is added as temporally correlated pink noise. The output is stored in the form of time-ordered datasets. We validated gateau against observations with DESHIMA 2.0, a superconducting, ultra-wideband spectrometer utilising KIDs and on-chip filterbank technology. We show that we can reproduce real observations of the atmosphere and Uranus with gateau simulations. Lastly, we present a use case to show how gateau can simulate long observations in timespans orders of magnitude smaller than the observation time itself, highlighting its applicability and efficiency.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents gateau, a modular, open-source simulator for ground-based submillimeter IFU observations with KIDs. It features a Python interface with a CUDA-accelerated C/C++ backend that propagates user-specified astronomical sources, atmospheric screens, scan patterns, and instrument parameters to produce time-ordered detector data. A physically motivated photon-noise model adds white noise, while temporally correlated pink noise models detector behavior. The central claim is that gateau reproduces real DESHIMA 2.0 observations of the atmosphere and Uranus, with an additional demonstration of its efficiency for simulating long observations in short wall-clock times.

Significance. If the noise models hold under broader conditions, gateau would provide a valuable, reproducible tool for end-to-end testing of instrument designs, calibration strategies, and data-reduction pipelines ahead of observations targeting galaxies, clusters, and large-scale structure. The public availability of the code, GPU acceleration, and modular architecture are explicit strengths that support community adoption and further development.

major comments (1)
  1. [Validation section] Validation section: the reproduction of DESHIMA 2.0 data is shown only for the atmosphere and Uranus (high signal-to-noise cases). No quantitative metrics—such as residual maps, noise power spectra, or measured 1/f knee frequencies—are reported for low-flux targets where source power is comparable to or below the detector noise floor. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that the photon-noise plus pink-noise model accurately captures real KID and atmospheric behavior for the intended faint-source science cases.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'we can reproduce real observations' but does not specify the quantitative comparison metrics or goodness-of-fit measures used; adding these would improve clarity.
  2. Figure captions in the validation and use-case sections should explicitly list the simulation parameters (e.g., atmospheric screen properties, scan speed, integration time) that correspond to the plotted data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and positive assessment of the significance of our work. We address the major comment regarding the validation section below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Validation section: the reproduction of DESHIMA 2.0 data is shown only for the atmosphere and Uranus (high signal-to-noise cases). No quantitative metrics—such as residual maps, noise power spectra, or measured 1/f knee frequencies—are reported for low-flux targets where source power is comparable to or below the detector noise floor. This directly affects the load-bearing claim that the photon-noise plus pink-noise model accurately captures real KID and atmospheric behavior for the intended faint-source science cases.

    Authors: We agree that the current validation is limited to high signal-to-noise cases and that quantitative metrics for low-flux regimes would provide stronger support for the intended faint-source applications. The photon-noise and pink-noise models are physically motivated and derived from first principles, which in principle extend to lower fluxes, but we acknowledge that explicit demonstration is needed. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection to the validation section that includes end-to-end simulations of faint sources (source power comparable to or below the noise floor). These will report residual maps after source subtraction, noise power spectra, and measured 1/f knee frequencies, allowing direct quantitative comparison to the model expectations. This addition will be accompanied by a brief discussion of the limitations of available real low-flux DESHIMA 2.0 data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Forward simulator validated on independent external observations; no derivation chain or fitting loop

full rationale

The manuscript describes gateau as a forward-modeling tool that ingests independent user inputs (astronomical source maps, atmospheric screens, scan patterns, telescope/instrument parameters) and propagates them through a photon-noise model plus temporally correlated pink noise to generate time-ordered data. Validation is performed by direct comparison of these outputs to separate real DESHIMA 2.0 observations of the atmosphere and Uranus. No equations, parameters, or uniqueness claims are fitted to the validation data and then re-used as predictions; the noise model is stated as physically motivated rather than tuned on the target dataset. Consequently the claimed reproduction of observations rests on external data rather than any self-referential reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so details on internal parameters are limited. The simulator relies on user-supplied inputs and standard noise models rather than introducing new fitted constants or entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption A physically motivated photon-noise model plus temporally correlated pink noise sufficiently represents real detector and atmospheric noise for the purpose of simulation validation.
    Invoked when adding noise to the propagated signal before producing time-ordered data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5665 in / 1350 out tokens · 55991 ms · 2026-05-08T06:59:32.882537+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references

  1. [1]

    2020, A&A, 642, A60

    Ade, P., Aravena, M., Barria, E., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A60

    2020

  2. [2]

    N., Jenness, T., Holland, W

    Archibald, E. N., Jenness, T., Holland, W. S., et al. 2002, MNRAS, 336, 1–13

    2002

  3. [3]

    2007, PASJ, 59, 397–418

    Asaki, Y ., Sudou, H., Kono, Y ., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, 397–418

    2007

  4. [4]

    Baselmans, J. J. A., Bueno, J., Yates, S. J. C., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A89

    2017

  5. [5]

    Baselmans, J. J. A., Facchin, F., Pascual Laguna, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 665, A17

    2022

  6. [6]

    2001, A&A, 365, 285–293

    Bensch, F., Stutzki, J., & Heithausen, A. 2001, A&A, 365, 285–293

    2001

  7. [7]

    1999, Phys

    Birkinshaw, M. 1999, Phys. Rep., 310, 97 Blanco Rodríguez, J., del Toro Iniesta, J. C., Orozco Suárez, D., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 237, 35

    1999

  8. [8]

    2021, Master’s thesis, Delft University of Technology

    Bosma, S. 2021, Master’s thesis, Delft University of Technology

    2021

  9. [9]

    Buscher, D. F. 2016, Optics Express, 24, 23566

    2016

  10. [10]

    2016, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 184, 816–823

    Calvo, M., Benoît, A., Catalano, A., et al. 2016, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 184, 816–823

    2016

  11. [11]

    & Fusco-Femiano, R

    Cavaliere, A. & Fusco-Femiano, R. 1978, A&A, 70, 677

    1978

  12. [12]

    2014, Professional CUDA C Pro- gramming (10475 Crosspoint Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46256: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) Cortés, F., Cortés, K., Reeves, R., Bustos, R., & Radford, S

    Cheng, J., Grossman, M., & McKercher, T. 2014, Professional CUDA C Pro- gramming (10475 Crosspoint Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46256: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) Cortés, F., Cortés, K., Reeves, R., Bustos, R., & Radford, S. 2020, A&A, 640, A126

    2014

  13. [13]

    O., Mavropoulou, A., Endo, A., et al

    Dabironezare, S. O., Mavropoulou, A., Endo, A., et al. 2026, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1–1

    2026

  14. [14]

    K., LeDuc, H

    Day, P. K., LeDuc, H. G., Mazin, B. A., Vayonakis, A., & Zmuidzinas, J. 2003, Nature, 425, 817–821 de Graaf, S. E., Faoro, L., Burnett, J., et al. 2018, Nature Communications, 9 de Pater, I., Fletcher, L. N., Luszcz-Cook, S., et al. 2014, Icarus, 237, 211–238 de Pater, I., Molter, E. M., & Moeckel, C. M. 2023, Remote Sensing, 15, 1313 de Pater, I., Sault,...

    2003

  15. [15]

    W., de Gasperin, F., & Rafferty, D

    Edler, H. W., de Gasperin, F., & Rafferty, D. 2021, A&A, 652, A37

    2021

  16. [16]

    2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 989–996

    Endo, A., Karatsu, K., Tamura, Y ., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 989–996

    2019

  17. [17]

    2004, in Proc

    Ezawa, H., Kawabe, R., Kohno, K., & Yamamoto, S. 2004, in Proc. SPIE, ed. J. Jacobus M. Oschmann (SPIE)

    2004

  18. [18]

    Fixsen, D. J. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 707, 916–920

    2009

  19. [19]

    A., LeDuc, H

    Gao, J., Zmuidzinas, J., Mazin, B. A., LeDuc, H. G., & Day, P. K. 2007, Applied Physics Letters, 90

    2007

  20. [20]

    1996, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 28, 1158

    Giorgini, J., Yeomans, D., Chamberlin, A., et al. 1996, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 28, 1158

    1996

  21. [21]

    U., et al

    Guan, X., Stutzki, J., Graf, U. U., et al. 2012, Astron. Astrophys., 542, L4

    2012

  22. [22]

    J., & Withington, S

    Guruswamy, T., Goldie, D. J., & Withington, S. 2014, Superconductor Science and Technology, 27, 055012 Güsten, R., Nyman, L. Å., Schilke, P., et al. 2006, A&A, 454, L13–L16

    2014

  23. [23]

    & Rubens, H

    Hagen, E. & Rubens, H. 1903, Annalen der Physik, 316, 873–901

    1903

  24. [24]

    Hofmann, V . B. & O’Brien, K. 2023, RAS Techniques and Instruments, 2, 278–292

    2023

  25. [25]

    2024, A&A, 689, A20

    Hu, W., Beelen, A., Lagache, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A20

    2024

  26. [26]

    Hughes, J. P. & Birkinshaw, M. 1998, The Astrophysical Journal, 501, 1–14

    1998

  27. [27]

    A., et al

    Huijten, E., Roelvink, Y ., Brackenhoff, S. A., et al. 2022, J. Astron. Telesc. In- strum. Syst., 8 Article number, page 11 of 13 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aanda

    2022

  28. [28]

    2008, in Millimeter and Submillimeter Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy IV , ed

    Inami, H., Bradford, M., Aguirre, J., et al. 2008, in Millimeter and Submillimeter Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy IV , ed. W. D. Duncan, W. S

    2008

  29. [29]

    1998, The Astrophysical Journal, 502, 7–15

    Itoh, N., Kohyama, Y ., & Nozawa, S. 1998, The Astrophysical Journal, 502, 7–15

    1998

  30. [30]

    Janssen, R. M. J., Baselmans, J. J. A., Endo, A., et al. 2013, Appl. Phys. Lett., 103, 203503

    2013

  31. [31]

    2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 447, 3467–3474

    Jia, P., Cai, D., Wang, D., & Basden, A. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 447, 3467–3474

    2015

  32. [32]

    2023, Journal of Physics: Photonics, 5, 042501

    Jovanovic, N., Gatkine, P., Anugu, N., et al. 2023, Journal of Physics: Photonics, 5, 042501

    2023

  33. [33]

    2026, DESHIMA 2.0: A 200-400 GHz Ultra-wideband Integrated Superconducting Spectrometer

    Karatsu, K., Endo, A., Moerman, A., et al. 2026, DESHIMA 2.0: A 200-400 GHz Ultra-wideband Integrated Superconducting Spectrometer

    2026

  34. [34]

    S., Bailey, J

    Kim, C. S., Bailey, J. I., López, R. A., Clay, W. H., & Mazin, B. A. 2025, The Astronomical Journal, 169, 176

    2025

  35. [35]

    Kirk, D. B. & Hwu, W. W. 2017, Programming massively parallel processors, third edition (North Charleston, SC: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform)

    2017

  36. [36]

    2021, hpc4cmb/toast: Update Pybind11

    Kisner, T., Keskitalo, R., Zonca, A., et al. 2021, hpc4cmb/toast: Update Pybind11

    2021

  37. [37]

    2016, Publications of the Astronom- ical Society of Japan, 68

    Kitayama, T., Ueda, S., Takakuwa, S., et al. 2016, Publications of the Astronom- ical Society of Japan, 68

    2016

  38. [38]

    D., Geers, V

    Klaassen, P. D., Geers, V . C., Beard, S. M., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 500, 2813–2821

    2020

  39. [39]

    2024, Physical Review Applied, 21

    Kouwenhoven, K., van Doorn, G., Buijtendorp, B., et al. 2024, Physical Review Applied, 21

    2024

  40. [40]

    Lay, O. P. 1997, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 122, 535–545

    1997

  41. [41]

    H., Karatsu, K., Endo, A., Baselmans, J

    Marting, L. H., Karatsu, K., Endo, A., Baselmans, J. J. A., & Pascual Laguna, A. 2024, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 216, 144–153

    2024

  42. [42]

    H., Karatsu, K., Scholtenhuis, L

    Marting, L. H., Karatsu, K., Scholtenhuis, L. G. G. O., et al. 2026, A High Effi- ciency Superconducting On-chip Filterbank with Directional Filters for Inte- gral Field Units in the Sub-millimeter Regime

    2026

  43. [43]

    2024, MockSZ: a Python interface for fast and accurate mock SZ map generation

    Moerman, A. 2024, MockSZ: a Python interface for fast and accurate mock SZ map generation

    2024

  44. [44]

    H., Karatsu, K., & Endo, A

    Moerman, A., Gafaji, M. H., Karatsu, K., & Endo, A. 2023, J. Open Source Softw., 8, 5478

    2023

  45. [45]

    Moerman, A., Karatsu, K., Baselmans, J. J. A., et al. 2025, Journal of Astronom- ical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 11

    2025

  46. [46]

    Moerman, A., Karatsu, K., Yates, S. J. C., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A161

    2024

  47. [47]

    M., de Pater, I., Luszcz-Cook, S., et al

    Molter, E. M., de Pater, I., Luszcz-Cook, S., et al. 2021, The Planetary Science Journal, 2, 3

    2021

  48. [48]

    W., Bustos, R., Calabrese, E., et al

    Morris, T. W., Bustos, R., Calabrese, E., et al. 2022, Physical Review D, 105

    2022

  49. [49]

    1998, ApJ, 508, 17–24

    Nozawa, S., Itoh, N., & Kohyama, Y . 1998, ApJ, 508, 17–24

    1998

  50. [50]

    1928, Physical Review, 32, 110–113 Olde Scholtenhuis, L

    Nyquist, H. 1928, Physical Review, 32, 110–113 Olde Scholtenhuis, L. G. G., Capelo, D. P., Karatsu, K., et al. 2026, Advances in the Fabrication of On-chip Superconducting Integral Field Units for CMB and Line-Intensity Astronomy O’Brien, K. 2020, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 199, 537–546

    1928

  51. [51]

    2001, IEEE Trans

    Pardo, J., Cernicharo, J., & Serabyn, E. 2001, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 49, 1683–1694 Pascual Laguna, A., Karatsu, K., Thoen, D., et al. 2021, IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 11, 635–646

    2001

  52. [52]

    & Braun, R

    Popping, A. & Braun, R. 2007, A&A, 479, 903–913

    2007

  53. [53]

    2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 26, 833

    Poyneer, L., van Dam, M., & Véran, J.-P. 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 26, 833

    2009

  54. [54]

    Reyes, N., Weiss, A., Yates, S. J. C., et al. 2026, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 707, A294

    2026

  55. [55]

    1966, Proc

    Ruze, J. 1966, Proc. IEEE, 54, 633

    1966

  56. [56]

    & van Engelen, A

    Scott, D. & van Engelen, A. 2005, SCAN Mode Strategies for SCUBA-2, Tech. rep

    2005

  57. [57]

    V ., Inatani, J., Shan, W., et al

    Shitov, S. V ., Inatani, J., Shan, W., et al. 2008, 19th International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, 263

    2008

  58. [58]

    Silveira, F. E. M. & Kurcbart, S. M. 2010, EPL (Europhysics Letters), 90, 44004

    2010

  59. [59]

    & Weintraub, S

    Smith, E. & Weintraub, S. 1953, Proceedings of the IRE, 41, 1035–1037

    1953

  60. [60]

    2022, Progress of Theoretical and Ex- perimental Physics, 2022

    Sueno, Y ., Honda, S., Kutsuma, H., et al. 2022, Progress of Theoretical and Ex- perimental Physics, 2022

    2022

  61. [61]

    Sunyaev, R. A. & Zeldovich, Y . B. 1970, Astrophysics and Space Science, 7, 3–19

    1970

  62. [62]

    Sunyaev, R. A. & Zeldovich, Y . B. 1980, MNRAS, 190, 413–420

    1980

  63. [63]

    2026, Silicon-based vacuum window for millimeter and submillimeter-wave astrophysics

    Takaku, R., Cray, S., Aizawa, K., et al. 2026, Silicon-based vacuum window for millimeter and submillimeter-wave astrophysics

    2026

  64. [64]

    Takekoshi, T., Karatsu, K., Suzuki, J., et al. 2020, J. Low Temp. Phys., 199, 231–239

    2020

  65. [65]

    Taniguchi, A., Bakx, T. J. L. C., Baselmans, J. J. A., et al. 2022, J. Low Temp. Phys., 209, 278 The HDF Group. 2025, Hierarchical Data Format, version 5

    2022

  66. [66]

    & König, M

    Timmer, J. & König, M. 1995, A&A, 300, 707

    1995

  67. [67]

    Ulich, B. L. & Haas, R. W. 1976, ApJS, 30, 247 van Marrewijk, J., Morris, T. W., Mroczkowski, T., et al. 2024, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 7 van Rantwijk, J., Grim, M., van Loon, D., et al. 2016, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 64, 1876–1883 von Hoerner, S. & Wong, W.-Y . 1975, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 23, 689

    1976

  68. [68]

    1967, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 15, 70–73

    Welch, P. 1967, IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 15, 70–73

    1967

  69. [69]

    Worrall, D. M. & Birkinshaw, M. 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society, 340, 1261–1268

    2003

  70. [70]

    Yates, S. J. C., Baselmans, J. J. A., Endo, A., et al. 2011, Applied Physics Letters, 99, 073505 Article number, page 12 of 13 A. Moerman et al.:gateau: GPU-accelerated time-dependent observation simulator 10□1 100 101 102 fxx [Hz] 10□1 100 101 ˆP obs xx / ˆP sim xx median 250 300 350 f[GHz] Fig. A.1.Ratios of ˆPxx for the good weather scenario. The avera...

    2011