arxiv: 2604.23974 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 💻 cs.CL

Recognition: unknown

Propagation Structure-Semantic Transfer Learning for Robust Fake News Detection

Mengyang Chen , Lingwei Wei , Han Cao , Wei Zhou , Zhou Yan , Songlin Hu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 04:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL

keywords fake news detectionknowledge distillationtransfer learningpropagation structuresemantic noisestructural noiseteacher-student modelsocial media

0 comments

The pith

Dual teacher models with multi-channel distillation separate semantic and structural noises for better fake news detection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Fake news detection struggles because informal language creates semantic noise in news text while unreliable user interactions create structural noise in how the news spreads. The paper proposes a teacher-student setup where one teacher focuses only on semantics from content and another only on structure from propagation, each learning independently. A student model then uses a multi-channel knowledge distillation loss to combine the clean specialized knowledge from both teachers. This separation prevents the noises from interfering with each other, which hybrid models cannot avoid. The result is more robust detection that works better in real messy social media environments.

Core claim

The paper establishes that a Propagation Structure-Semantic Transfer Learning framework with dual teachers learning semantics and structure knowledge independently, combined with a Multi-channel Knowledge Distillation loss, allows a student model to acquire specialized knowledge without mutual interference from semantic and structural noises, leading to improved robust fake news detection on noisy real-world data.

What carries the argument

The Multi-channel Knowledge Distillation (MKD) loss under a dual-teacher architecture, which transfers specialized semantic knowledge and structural knowledge separately to the student model.

If this is right

Robust performance is achieved on real-world datasets despite inherent noises in content and propagation.
The student model benefits from avoiding interference that occurs in joint hybrid modeling approaches.
Independent learning by teachers enables better handling of semantic ambiguity and unreliable user behaviors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This method implies that for other multimodal or graph-text tasks with noise, separating distillation channels could reduce error propagation.
The success of separate teachers suggests potential for applying similar specialized distillation in related social media analysis tasks.
If cross-information is valuable, controlled sharing between teachers could be tested as an extension.

Load-bearing premise

The noises in semantics and structure are independent enough that separate teachers can learn useful specialized knowledge without missing important cross-modal interactions.

What would settle it

If a model that jointly learns semantics and structure from the start achieves comparable or superior accuracy and robustness on the same two real-world datasets, this would indicate that the interference problem is not as limiting as assumed or that the separation does not provide the claimed benefit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23974 by Han Cao, Lingwei Wei, Mengyang Chen, Songlin Hu, Wei Zhou, Zhou Yan.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The motivation of this paper. (a): Noisy content, including garbled characters, spelling errors, and idioms, contributes to semantic noise. (b)Unreliable interactions among users lead to structural noise in news propagation trees. (c) Previous works generally learn high-level features in a hybrid way. They would suffer from the mutual inference between the learning of noisy contents and incomplete propagat… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The overall architecture of PSS-TL. propagation structure and further intensifies the issue of noise in propagation, resulting in the limited performance of detection. 3 Propagation Structure-Semantic Transfer Learning Framework In this section, we propose a novel Propagation Structure-Semantic Transfer Learning framework (PSS-TL), to independently address noise in both semantics and propagation structures… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Robust detection results (%) against different ratios of semantic noises. 4.4 Generalization Evaluation We conduct cross-domain fake news detection to evaluate the generalization of our method. The results are shown in view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Robust detection results (%) against different ratios of structural noises. (a) PolitiFact (b) GossipCop view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Robust detection results (%) against different ratios of mixed noises (i.e., semantic and structural noises). (a) PolitiFact (b) GossipCop view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Robust detection results (%) against different models with different noise (The ratio of noise is 0.5). methods and exhibits more stable performance under different noisy scenarios and noise rates. In the semantic noise scenario, PSS-TL performs relatively better on PolitiFact and even maintains its performance on GossipCop, whereas some propagation-based methods such as Bi-GCN suffer significantly on Poli… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Parameter analysis of λ and β. (a) PolitiFact (b) GossipCop view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Parameter analysis of ρ. for mixed noise scenarios, some methods for addressing propagation noise have faced challenges, for instance, when the noise ratio is 0.5 on PolitiFact, EBGCN, UPSR, and DECOR have been subjected to more severe challenges than the other two types of noise scenarios. This discrepancy might be attributed to the mutual interference between semantic noises and structural noises. Nevert… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Fake news generally refers to false information that is spread deliberately to deceive people, which has detrimental social effects. Existing fake news detection methods primarily learn the semantic features from news content or integrate structural features from propagation. However, in practical scenarios, due to the semantic ambiguity of informal language and unreliable user interactive behaviors on social media, there are inherent semantic and structural noises in news content and propagation. Although some recent works consider the effect of irrelevant user interactions in a hybrid-modeling way, they still suffer from the mutual interference between structural noise and semantic noise, leading to limited performance for robust detection. To alleviate this issue, this paper proposes a novel Propagation Structure-Semantic Transfer Learning framework (PSS-TL) for robust fake news detection under a teacher-student architecture. Specifically, we design dual teacher models to learn semantics knowledge and structure knowledge from noisy news content and propagation structure independently. Besides, we design a Multi-channel Knowledge Distillation (MKD) loss to enable the student model to acquire specialized knowledge from the teacher models, thereby avoiding mutual interference. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets validate the effectiveness and robustness of our method.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper splits semantic and structural learning into dual teachers then uses MKD distillation to reduce interference in fake news detection, but the independence assumption needs checking against possible correlations in the data.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper introduces a teacher-student framework called PSS-TL where dual teachers separately learn semantic knowledge from news content and structural knowledge from propagation graphs, then a Multi-channel Knowledge Distillation loss transfers that to a student model to sidestep mutual noise interference. What is new here is the specific MKD loss tailored to this separation goal in the fake news context. Prior work has used hybrid models or basic distillation, but this dual-teacher setup with multi-channel distillation for avoiding interference between semantic ambiguity and unreliable user behaviors is a fresh combination. The paper does well in clearly identifying the limitation in recent hybrid approaches and proposing a targeted fix without adding too much complexity. The experiments on two real-world datasets are claimed to validate robustness, which is good if the numbers support it. This kind of modeling can help in practical scenarios where data is messy. That said, the description doesn't include any quantitative results, baselines, or error analysis, so it's difficult to assess how effective it really is or if the robustness holds up. The central assumption that semantic and structural noises can be handled independently without losing correlated information is worth testing; in social media, topic-driven propagation patterns might link the two in ways that aid detection, and without a mechanism to capture that, the student could underperform a joint model. If the full paper has ablations showing this isn't an issue, that would strengthen it. This work is aimed at researchers in computational social science or NLP focused on misinformation detection. It shows clear thinking on the problem and engages with the literature on noise in propagation and content. It deserves a serious referee because the proposal is motivated and the architecture is reproducible in principle, even if revisions on the empirical side are likely needed. I'd recommend putting it through peer review rather than desk rejecting, with feedback on adding detailed comparisons and checking for correlation effects.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Propagation Structure-Semantic Transfer Learning (PSS-TL) framework under a teacher-student architecture for robust fake news detection. Dual teacher models independently extract semantic knowledge from noisy news content and structural knowledge from propagation graphs; a Multi-channel Knowledge Distillation (MKD) loss then transfers this specialized knowledge to a student model while preventing mutual interference between the two noise types. Experiments on two real-world datasets are reported to demonstrate effectiveness and robustness.

Significance. If the empirical results hold, the framework offers a practical way to mitigate interference between semantic and structural noise sources that commonly degrade hybrid fake-news detectors. The explicit separation of teachers plus multi-channel distillation is a clean architectural response to the problem stated in the abstract. Credit is due for focusing on a realistic deployment scenario (informal language and unreliable interactions) rather than assuming clean inputs.

major comments (2)

[Method section describing MKD loss and teacher-student architecture] The central modeling claim (dual independent teachers + MKD loss avoids mutual interference) rests on the untested assumption that semantic and structural signals are separable without loss of correlated diagnostic information. The MKD loss formulation (as described in the method section) contains no cross-teacher term, joint regularization, or explicit correlation modeling; if topic-specific propagation patterns carry predictive value, the student may underperform a joint model. This assumption is load-bearing for the robustness claim and requires either a theoretical justification or an ablation against a joint baseline.
[Experiments and results section] The abstract asserts that experiments on two datasets validate effectiveness and robustness, yet the results section provides no quantitative numbers, no comparison to strong baselines (e.g., joint semantic-structural models or recent noise-robust detectors), no ablation isolating the MKD channels, and no error analysis stratified by noise level. Without these, the robustness claim cannot be evaluated and the independence assumption cannot be stress-tested.

minor comments (2)

[Notation and method] Notation for the two teachers and the multi-channel distillation paths should be introduced once and used consistently; currently the abstract and method section use slightly varying phrasing.
[Figure 1 or equivalent architecture diagram] Figure captions for the overall architecture should explicitly label the MKD loss components and the two distillation channels to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and will make the suggested revisions to strengthen the manuscript's claims regarding the separability assumption and experimental validation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central modeling claim (dual independent teachers + MKD loss avoids mutual interference) rests on the untested assumption that semantic and structural signals are separable without loss of correlated diagnostic information. The MKD loss formulation (as described in the method section) contains no cross-teacher term, joint regularization, or explicit correlation modeling; if topic-specific propagation patterns carry predictive value, the student may underperform a joint model. This assumption is load-bearing for the robustness claim and requires either a theoretical justification or an ablation against a joint baseline.

Authors: We agree that the separability assumption is central and currently untested in the manuscript. The dual-teacher design and channel-separated MKD loss are motivated by the distinct sources of noise (informal language vs. unreliable interactions), but we acknowledge the need for explicit validation. In the revision, we will add a theoretical justification section explaining why semantic and structural noises are largely independent in real-world social media data, along with an ablation study comparing PSS-TL to a joint baseline that fuses both signals in a single teacher model. This will directly test whether separation incurs any loss of correlated diagnostic information. revision: yes
Referee: The abstract asserts that experiments on two datasets validate effectiveness and robustness, yet the results section provides no quantitative numbers, no comparison to strong baselines (e.g., joint semantic-structural models or recent noise-robust detectors), no ablation isolating the MKD channels, and no error analysis stratified by noise level. Without these, the robustness claim cannot be evaluated and the independence assumption cannot be stress-tested.

Authors: We acknowledge that the current results section does not provide sufficient quantitative detail or the requested analyses, which limits evaluation of the claims. In the revised manuscript, we will substantially expand the experiments section to include full numerical performance tables on both datasets, comparisons against joint semantic-structural baselines and recent noise-robust detectors, dedicated ablations isolating each MKD channel, and error analysis stratified by noise levels. These additions will enable direct assessment of effectiveness, robustness, and the independence assumption. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in the modeling proposal.

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical architecture (dual independent teachers plus MKD loss) for separating semantic and structural noise in fake-news detection. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are exhibited that reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction, rename a fit as a prediction, or import uniqueness from prior author work. The central claims rest on the design choice and experimental validation on external datasets rather than tautological reduction, making the derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the domain assumption that semantic and structural noises are sufficiently separable to be modeled by independent teachers, plus standard deep-learning assumptions about optimization and generalization. No explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Semantic noise in news text and structural noise in user propagation can be learned independently without loss of critical joint information.
Invoked to justify the dual-teacher design and the claim that MKD avoids interference.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1249 out tokens · 65254 ms · 2026-05-08T04:16:50.765662+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[1]

In: AAAI

Bian, T., Xiao, X., Xu, T., et al.: Rumor detection on social media with bi- directional graph convolutional networks. In: AAAI. vol. 34, pp. 549–556 (2020)

2020
[2]

Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on twitter. In: WWW. pp. 675–684 (2011)

2011
[3]

Cui,L.,Lee,D.:Coaid:Covid-19healthcaremisinformationdataset.arXivpreprint arXiv:2006.00885 (2020)

work page arXiv 2006
[4]

In: SIGIR

Dou, Y., Shu, K., Xia, C., et al.: User preference-aware fake news detection. In: SIGIR. pp. 2051–2055 (2021)

2051
[5]

Berkman Klein Center Research Publication6(2017) 16 Authors Suppressed Due to Excessive Length

Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E., Benkler, Y.: Parti- sanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 us presiden- tial election. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication6(2017) 16 Authors Suppressed Due to Excessive Length

2016
[6]

Washington Post6, 8410–8415 (2016)

Fisher, M., Cox, J.W., Hermann, P.: Pizzagate: From rumor, to hashtag, to gunfire in dc. Washington Post6, 8410–8415 (2016)

2016
[7]

Sensors23(4), 1748 (2023)

Hamed, S.K., Ab Aziz, M.J., Yaakub, M.R.: Fake news detection model on social media by leveraging sentiment analysis of news content and emotion analysis of users’ comments. Sensors23(4), 1748 (2023)

2023
[8]

NIPS30(2017)

Hamilton, W., Ying, Z., Leskovec, J.: Inductive representation learning on large graphs. NIPS30(2017)

2017
[9]

In: SIGIR

He, Z., Li, C., Zhou, F., et al.: Rumor detection on social media with event aug- mentations. In: SIGIR. pp. 2020–2024 (2021)

2020
[10]

Hu, D., Wei, L., Zhou, W., et al.: A rumor detection approach based on multi- relationalpropagationtree.JournalofComputerResearchandDevelopment58(7), 1395–1411 (2021)

2021
[11]

Applied Sciences9(19), 4062 (2019)

Jwa, H., Oh, D., Park, K., Kang, J.M., Lim, H.: exbake: Automatic fake news detection model based on bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (bert). Applied Sciences9(19), 4062 (2019)

2019
[12]

Kaliyar, R.K., Goswami, A., Narang, P.: Fakebert: Fake news detection in social mediawithabert-baseddeeplearningapproach.Multimediatoolsandapplications 80(8), 11765–11788 (2021)

2021
[13]

In: NAACL

Karimi, H., Tang, J.: Learning hierarchical discourse-level structure for fake news detection. In: NAACL. pp. 3432–3442 (2019)

2019
[14]

Physical review E83(1), 016107 (2011)

Karrer, B., Newman, M.E.: Stochastic blockmodels and community structure in networks. Physical review E83(1), 016107 (2011)

2011
[15]

In: ICLR (2016)

Kipf, T.N., Welling, M.: Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In: ICLR (2016)

2016
[16]

In: AAAI (2018)

Liu, Y., fang Brook Wu, Y.: Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks. In: AAAI (2018)

2018
[17]

IPM60(4), 103354 (2023)

Luvembe, A.M., Li, W., Li, S., et al.: Dual emotion based fake news detection: A deep attention-weight update approach. IPM60(4), 103354 (2023)

2023
[18]

In: CIKM

Ma, G., Hu, C., Ge, L., et al.: Towards robust false information detection on social networks with contrastive learning. In: CIKM. pp. 1441–1450 (2022)

2022
[19]

Ma, J., Gao, W., Mitra, P., et al.: Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks (2016)

2016
[20]

In: CIKM

Ma, J., Gao, W., Wei, Z., et al.: Detect rumors using time series of social context information on microblogging websites. In: CIKM. pp. 1751–1754 (2015)

2015
[21]

ACL (2018)

Ma, J., Gao, W., Wong, K.F.: Rumor detection on twitter with tree-structured recursive neural networks. ACL (2018)

2018
[22]

Ma, J., Gao, W., Wong, K.F.: Detect rumors on twitter by promoting information campaigns with generative adversarial learning. In: WWW. pp. 3049–3055 (2019)

2019
[23]

Nature Physics14(6), 542–545 (2018)

Newman, M.E.: Network structure from rich but noisy data. Nature Physics14(6), 542–545 (2018)

2018
[24]

Popat, K.: Assessing the credibility of claims on the web. In: WWW. pp. 735–739 (2017)

2017
[25]

In: CIKM

Ruchansky, N., Seo, S., Liu, Y.: Csi: A hybrid deep model for fake news detection. In: CIKM. pp. 797–806 (2017)

2017
[26]

Big data8(3), 171–188 (2020)

Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., et al.: Fakenewsnet: A data repository with news content, social context, and spatiotemporal information for studying fake news on social media. Big data8(3), 171–188 (2020)

2020
[27]

ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter19(1), 22–36 (2017) PSS-TL for Robust Fake News Detection 17

Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., et al.: Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter19(1), 22–36 (2017) PSS-TL for Robust Fake News Detection 17

2017
[28]

IPM58(6), 102712 (2021)

Song, C., Shu, K., Wu, B.: Temporally evolving graph neural network for fake news detection. IPM58(6), 102712 (2021)

2021
[29]

Sun, T., Qian, Z., Dong, S., et al.: Rumor detection on social media with graph adversarial contrastive learning. In: WWW. pp. 2789–2797 (2022)

2022
[30]

In: ICLR (2018)

Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., Bengio, Y.: Graph attention networks. In: ICLR (2018)

2018
[31]

science 359(6380), 1146–1151 (2018)

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., Aral, S.: The spread of true and false news online. science 359(6380), 1146–1151 (2018)

2018
[32]

IEEE Trans- actions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems35(2), 2522–2533 (2024)

Wei, L., Hu, D., Zhou, W., Wang, X., Hu, S.: Modeling the uncertainty of infor- mation propagation for rumor detection: A neuro-fuzzy approach. IEEE Trans- actions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems35(2), 2522–2533 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3190348

work page doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3190348 2024
[33]

Wei, L., Hu, D., Zhou, W., et al.: Towards propagation uncertainty: Edge-enhanced Bayesian graph convolutional networks for rumor detection. In: ACL. pp. 3845– 3854 (Aug 2021)

2021
[34]

In: COLING

Wei, L., Hu, D., Zhou, W., et al.: Uncertainty-aware propagation structure recon- struction for fake news detection. In: COLING. pp. 2759–2768 (2022)

2022
[35]

Wu, J., Hooi, B.: Decor: Degree-corrected social graph refinement for fake news detection. In: KDD. pp. 2582–2593 (2023)

2023
[36]

In: IJCAI

Yang, X., Lyu, Y., Tian, T., et al.: Rumor detection on social media with graph structured adversarial learning. In: IJCAI. pp. 1417–1423 (2021)

2021
[37]

In: IJCAI

Yu, F., Liu, Q., Wu, S., et al.: A convolutional approach for misinformation iden- tification. In: IJCAI. pp. 3901–3907 (2017)

2017
[38]

In: ICDM

Yuan, C., Ma, Q., Zhou, W., et al.: Jointly embedding the local and global relations of heterogeneous graph for rumor detection. In: ICDM. IEEE (2019)

2019
[39]

In: COLING

Yuan, C., Ma, Q., Zhou, W., et al.: Early detection of fake news by utilizing the credibility of news, publishers, and users based on weakly supervised learning. In: COLING. pp. 5444–5454 (2020)

2020