pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24215 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🪐 quant-ph

Dynamical generation of stable optical-microwave squeezing in structured reservoirs

Chen Wang , Man Shen , Shi-fan Qi , Yan-kui Bai This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 04:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords two-mode squeezingnon-Markovian noiseelectro-optomechanical systemstructured reservoirsoptical-microwave entanglementhybrid quantum systemsparametric amplification
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-Markovian noise in structured reservoirs enhances and stabilizes optical-microwave two-mode squeezing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs an effective model for squeezing between an optical mode and a microwave mode mediated by a mechanical oscillator in a hybrid system. It then analyzes the dynamics under structured, non-Markovian environments and finds that memory effects in the noise can increase the achievable squeezing and allow the entangled state to survive even when driving fields are turned off. This happens because the non-Markovian character reduces the impact of anti-squeezing noise. Readers interested in quantum technologies would care since two-mode squeezing is a basic resource for sensing and communication, and real devices always sit in structured baths rather than ideal Markovian ones.

Core claim

An effective Hamiltonian is built from modulated drives on the photonic modes plus a mechanical parametric amplifier to generate optical-microwave squeezing. In this model the dynamical evolution reveals that non-Markovian noise raises the squeezing level above the Markovian limit and permits the two-mode squeezed state to persist indefinitely without external drives, with the effect strengthened when the optical and microwave spectral densities coincide.

What carries the argument

The effective optical-microwave squeezing Hamiltonian obtained by combining strongly modulated driving fields with a mechanical parametric amplifier, which governs the two-mode dynamics in the presence of structured reservoirs.

If this is right

  • Two-mode squeezing reaches higher values when the reservoir noise has non-Markovian character.
  • Squeezed states remain stable without continuous external driving under non-Markovian conditions.
  • Anti-squeezing is suppressed by the memory effects of the structured environment.
  • Matching spectral densities between optical and microwave modes further improves state persistence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests that deliberately engineering the frequency dependence of environmental couplings could be used to protect other forms of quantum correlation in open systems.
  • Similar non-Markovian stabilization might appear in purely optical or superconducting circuit analogs of the hybrid setup.
  • Experiments could check whether the predicted persistence occurs by suddenly switching off the drives and monitoring the decay of quadrature correlations.

Load-bearing premise

The effective Hamiltonian constructed from the modulated drives and mechanical amplifier correctly describes the squeezing interaction inside the structured reservoirs.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing that the squeezing level drops or fails to persist when the drives are removed in a non-Markovian regime, or that Markovian and non-Markovian cases yield the same maximum squeezing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24215 by Chen Wang, Man Shen, Shi-fan Qi, Yan-kui Bai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram: The mechanical resonator serves view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Time evolution of the squeezing variance view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. [(a), (b)] The squeezing level (SL) view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. [(a), (b)] The time evolutions of the variances view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The squeezing level view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. All evolution paths between the quantum states view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. [(a), (c)] Theoretical results about the effective c view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Two relevant imaginary components of the normalized view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: It can be observed that the values of ∆X(t) (pur￾ple dashed line) obtained using Eq. (C8) do match well with those calculated via the effective Hamiltonian [Eq. (C6), black solid line]. Additionally, the matrix element V˜ 11(t), calculated by Eq. (C8), is presented in the inset and also exhibits good agreement with the corresponding effective result V11(t) (red￾solid line with square markers) view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Two-mode squeezed states as paradigmatic entangled resources have broad applications in quantum information processing. Here, we study the generation of stable optical-microwave squeezing in structured environments within a hybrid electro-optomechanical system, where a mechanical oscillator is simultaneously coupled to an optical cavity mode and a microwave mode of an LC resonator. Specifically, an effective Hamiltonian that captures the optical-microwave squeezing interaction is constructed by combining strongly modulated driving fields applied to both photonic modes with a mechanical parametric amplifier. Based on this effective model, the dynamical evolution of two-mode squeezing in structured environments is analyzed. It is remarkably shown that the non-Markovian noise can substantially enhance the squeezing level in comparison to the Markovian case, and that two-mode squeezing can persist even in the absence of external driving fields under non-Markovian conditions, thereby mitigating the detrimental effects of anti-squeezing. Furthermore, the persistence of the two-mode squeezed state is enhanced when the environmental spectral densities of the microwave and optical modes are identical. Our work provides a theoretical framework for generating and persisting two-mode squeezing in structured environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies dynamical generation of stable two-mode optical-microwave squeezing in a hybrid electro-optomechanical system coupled to structured (non-Markovian) reservoirs. An effective Hamiltonian for the squeezing interaction is constructed by combining strongly modulated driving fields on the photonic modes with a mechanical parametric amplifier; the subsequent master-equation dynamics are solved to show that non-Markovian noise can enhance squeezing relative to the Markovian limit and can sustain squeezing even after the external drives are switched off, with further improvement when the optical and microwave spectral densities are identical.

Significance. If the effective model remains valid, the result offers a concrete route to exploit reservoir memory for more robust hybrid entanglement resources, reducing the need for continuous driving and partially counteracting anti-squeezing. The framework is potentially useful for quantum information applications that rely on optical-microwave interfaces.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (effective Hamiltonian derivation): the time-dependent unitary transformation and adiabatic elimination implicitly assume a clean separation between modulation frequencies, mechanical frequency, and reservoir correlation times. When the spectral densities are structured, the memory kernel can couple to drive-induced sidebands, potentially generating additional decoherence channels or renormalizing the squeezing parameter not captured by the reduced model. An explicit validity condition (e.g., inequality involving modulation depth, detunings, and the width of the spectral density) or a benchmark against the full time-dependent Hamiltonian is required to support the central claims.
  2. [Results] Results section (dynamical evolution and figures): the reported enhancement of squeezing and its persistence without drives rest on numerical integration of the effective master equation. Without tabulated parameters (coupling strengths, modulation amplitudes, explicit forms of the spectral densities J(ω)), or a direct comparison of the squeezing parameter r(t) for Markovian vs. non-Markovian cases with the same integrated noise strength, it is impossible to verify that the improvement is due to non-Markovianity rather than a change in effective decay rates.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the two-mode squeezing parameter and the quadrature variances should be defined once at first use and used consistently; several figures appear to plot different normalizations without explicit labels.
  2. The abstract states that squeezing 'can persist even in the absence of external driving fields'; the corresponding section should clarify whether the drives are abruptly switched off or adiabatically ramped down, as the latter may preserve more squeezing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas for improvement. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (effective Hamiltonian derivation): the time-dependent unitary transformation and adiabatic elimination implicitly assume a clean separation between modulation frequencies, mechanical frequency, and reservoir correlation times. When the spectral densities are structured, the memory kernel can couple to drive-induced sidebands, potentially generating additional decoherence channels or renormalizing the squeezing parameter not captured by the reduced model. An explicit validity condition (e.g., inequality involving modulation depth, detunings, and the width of the spectral density) or a benchmark against the full time-dependent Hamiltonian is required to support the central claims.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the importance of rigorously justifying the effective model under structured reservoirs. The derivation in Sec. II uses a time-dependent unitary transformation followed by adiabatic elimination of the mechanical degree of freedom, relying on a separation of timescales where modulation frequencies greatly exceed the mechanical frequency and the reservoir correlation time. We agree that an explicit validity condition is beneficial for clarity. In the revised manuscript we will add the condition Ω ≫ γ (where Ω denotes the modulation amplitude and γ the spectral density width) together with a brief discussion of why sideband couplings remain off-resonant in the chosen parameter regime. A complete numerical benchmark against the full time-dependent Hamiltonian for the non-Markovian case lies outside the present scope owing to computational cost; however, we will include a supporting comparison in the Markovian limit to illustrate consistency of the approximation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (dynamical evolution and figures): the reported enhancement of squeezing and its persistence without drives rest on numerical integration of the effective master equation. Without tabulated parameters (coupling strengths, modulation amplitudes, explicit forms of the spectral densities J(ω)), or a direct comparison of the squeezing parameter r(t) for Markovian vs. non-Markovian cases with the same integrated noise strength, it is impossible to verify that the improvement is due to non-Markovianity rather than a change in effective decay rates.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting the need for more transparent parameter reporting and controlled comparisons. The manuscript already states the optomechanical coupling g, modulation amplitudes, and the explicit Lorentzian forms of J(ω) (with centers and widths) in Sec. III and the figure captions. To improve accessibility we will insert a dedicated parameter table in the revised version. In addition, we will add a new panel (or supplementary figure) that directly compares r(t) for the Markovian and non-Markovian cases while keeping the integrated noise strength ∫J(ω)dω identical; this comparison confirms that the reported enhancement and drive-free persistence originate from the non-Markovian memory kernel rather than from a simple rescaling of decay rates. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from effective model

full rationale

The paper constructs an effective Hamiltonian by combining modulated driving fields on photonic modes with a mechanical parametric amplifier, then evolves the system under non-Markovian structured reservoirs using that model to derive claims about enhanced squeezing and persistence without driving. These results follow from solving the dynamics (e.g., via master equation or correlation functions) under the model's assumptions of timescale separation, without reducing to fitted inputs renamed as predictions, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The effective model is introduced as an approximation, not tautologically equivalent to the target squeezing metrics, and the non-Markovian enhancement is an output of the analysis rather than an input. The derivation chain remains independent of the final claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the effective Hamiltonian model and the assumption that the environments possess structured spectral densities that produce non-Markovian dynamics.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption An effective Hamiltonian constructed from modulated driving fields and a mechanical parametric amplifier captures the optical-microwave squeezing interaction.
    This model is the starting point for all subsequent dynamical analysis in structured reservoirs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1226 out tokens · 33715 ms · 2026-05-08T04:19:21.525981+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Under strong coherent drivings, the microwave and optical modes are assumed to ac- quire large steady-state amplitudes |⟨a⟩| ≫ 1 and |⟨c⟩| ≫ 1, respectively

    transforms into H ′ s = ∑ o=a,c ∆ oo†o + goo†o(b + b†) + iEo(o† − o) + ∆ bb†b + iΩ b(b†2 − b2), (2) where ∆ s ≡ ω s − ǫs, s = a, b, c . Under strong coherent drivings, the microwave and optical modes are assumed to ac- quire large steady-state amplitudes |⟨a⟩| ≫ 1 and |⟨c⟩| ≫ 1, respectively. This allows the system dynamics to be linearized by decomposing...

    work page

  2. [2]

    3˜ω b and r ≤ 0

    1˜ω b ≤ g, G ≤ 0. 3˜ω b and r ≤ 0. 2. Within this regime, the effective coupling strength satisfies geff ≥ 0. 01˜ω b. More- over, consistent with the theoretical predictions of Eq. ( 6), in- creasing the coupling strengths g and G, as well as the MP A parameter r, can further enhance the magnitude of geff . 3 III. OPTICAL-MICROW A VE SQUEEZING IN STRUCTURED ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    ( 9), one can derive the NMHL equation ˙O(t) = T O(t) − ∫ t 0 ¯F (t − s)O(s)ds + ǫin(t)

    and the interaction Hamiltonian in Eq. ( 9), one can derive the NMHL equation ˙O(t) = T O(t) − ∫ t 0 ¯F (t − s)O(s)ds + ǫin(t). (10) Here, the time-evolution operator for the system modes is O(t) = [ a(t), c †(t)]T and the input noise operator is ǫin(t) = [ain(t), c † in(t)]T , where ain ≡ − i ∑ k gke− i(ω k− ω a)tak(0) and c† in ≡ i ∑ j Jjei(˜ω j − ω c)t...

    work page

  4. [4]

    un- der both Markovian and structured environments, as shown in Fig. 2(a). It is observed that the variance ∆ X gradually converges to a constant value over time, regardless of wheth er the system is embedded in a Markovian (blue solid line) or a structured environment (red dash-dotted line). In contra st, the variance ∆ Y exhibits exponential growth, ind...

    work page

  5. [5]

    accurately captures the effective two-mode squeezing 0 200 400 0 5 10 15(b) 0 200 400 0 200 400 600(c) FIG. 2. (a) Time evolution of the squeezing variance ∆ X(t) for dif- ferent environments and coupling strengths g. [(b), (c)] Time evo- lution of the anti-squeezing variance ∆ Y (t) at g = 0 . 15˜ω b and g = 0 . 2˜ω b for different environments. The Mark...

    work page

  6. [6]

    To characterize the protocol performance over a broad pa- rameter range, we evaluate the SL S(τ) at the representa- tive time ˜ω bτ = 300 , as shown in Figs

    remains an effective description of the optical- 5 microwave squeezing over a relatively long time interval. To characterize the protocol performance over a broad pa- rameter range, we evaluate the SL S(τ) at the representa- tive time ˜ω bτ = 300 , as shown in Figs. 3(a) and (b). In both Markovian and structured environments, the SL S(τ) in- creases monot...

    work page

  7. [7]

    As the spectral width increases, the SL in structured environments gradual ly approaches the value in Markovian environments

    (obtained in Markovian environments) unable to fully capture the two-mode squeezing phenomenon. As the spectral width increases, the SL in structured environments gradual ly approaches the value in Markovian environments. This be- havior is consistent with the theoretical understanding th at the Markovian limit corresponds to an environment with an in- fin...

    work page

  8. [8]

    2(a) and (b)

    is established and the system evolves as in Figs. 2(a) and (b). At t = τ, the driving fields are switched off, thereby eliminating the optical-microwave coupling, and the subse - quent dynamics characterize the persistence of the generat ed squeezing (beige regions). Under Markovian noise, both var i- ances ∆ X [blue solid and black dotted lines in Fig. 4(...

    work page

  9. [9]

    ( A1), one can have ˜G = 2 √ (n + 1)(k + 1)˜ω bgGe2rei(α +ϕ ) ∆ 2 c − ˜ω 2 b ≡ √ (n + 1)(k + 1)ei(α +ϕ )geff , (A3) up to the second order of g and G

    By virtue of Eq. ( A1), one can have ˜G = 2 √ (n + 1)(k + 1)˜ω bgGe2rei(α +ϕ ) ∆ 2 c − ˜ω 2 b ≡ √ (n + 1)(k + 1)ei(α +ϕ )geff , (A3) up to the second order of g and G. In the following, we evaluate the energy shift ǫ1 associated with the state |nlk⟩. Summarizing all eight paths from |nlk⟩ to |nlk⟩ through an intermediate state, four representative paths ar...

    work page

  10. [10]

    satisfy ˙˜u(t) = i[H, ˜u(t)] = iL˜u(t), (B1) where ˜u(t) = [ Xa(t), Y a(t), X b(t), Y b(t), X c(t), Y c(t)]T is the vector of quadrature operators, and Xa = ( e− iα a + eiα a†)/ √ 2, Ya = (e− iα a − eiα a†)/i √ 2, Xb = (b + b†)/ √ 2, Yb = ( b − b†)/i √ 2, Xc = ( e− iϕ c + eiϕ c†)/ √ 2, Yc = (e− iϕ c − eiϕ c†)/i √

    work page

  11. [11]

    (B2) As shown in the energy-level diagram of this matrix L ver- sus ∆ a, the presence of the two-mode squeezing interaction described by Eq

    L represents the system’s transition matrix, L = − i        0 ∆ a 0 0 0 0 − ∆ a 0 − 2Ger 0 0 0 0 0 0 ˜ ω b 0 0 − 2Ger 0 − ˜ω b 0 − 2ger 0 0 0 0 0 0 ∆ c 0 0 − 2ger 0 − ∆ c 0        . (B2) As shown in the energy-level diagram of this matrix L ver- sus ∆ a, the presence of the two-mode squeezing interaction described by Eq. (

    work page

  12. [12]

    is manifested by the maximal splittings appearing in the imaginary parts of the eigenvalues [ 15]. In Fig. 7, we show the imaginary parts of the two relevant eigenvalues of the full transition matrix L in Eq. ( B2), ob- tained via numerical diagonalization. As the detuning of th e optical mode ∆ a approaches (but does not exactly equal) the opposite detun...

    work page

  13. [13]

    15˜ω b, and r = 0. 2. 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 -0.04 -0.02 0 num,r=0.1 ana,r=0.1 num,r=0.2 ana,r=0.2 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.05 0.15 0.25 0.35 -0.04 -0.02 0 (a) (c) (b) (d) FIG. 8. [(a), (c)] Theoretical results about the effective c oupling strength geff from Eq. ( 6) (lines) are plotted as functions of g...

    work page

  14. [14]

    According to the QLE in Eq

    ain and cin are characterized by their respective covariance functions, ⟨o† in(t)oin(t′)⟩ = Noδ(t − t′), o = a, c , in which No = [exp( ℏω o/k BT ) − 1]− 1 is the mean population of mode o at the thermal equilibrium state. According to the QLE in Eq. ( C1), the system’s evolution can be completely characterized by a 4 × 4 CM V (t). The dynamics of the CM ...

    work page

  15. [15]

    S. L. Braunstein and P . van Loock, Quantum information with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513 (2005)

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum infor- mation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Reiserer and G

    A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    M.-F. Wang, Y . Zhang, N.-Q. Jiang, and Y .-Z. Zheng, Efficient two-mode squeezing and quantum-state teleportation of mac ro- scopic atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. A 79, 012327 (2009)

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    Mamaev, M

    M. Mamaev, M. Koppenh¨ ofer, A. Pocklington, and A. A. Clerk, Non-gaussian generalized two-mode squeezing: Ap- plications to two-ensemble spin squeezing and beyond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 073603 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quan- tum metrology, Nat. Photonics 5, 222 (2011)

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    J. Liu, T. Shao, Y . Wang, M. Zhang, Y . Hu, D. Chen, and D. Wei, Enhancement of the phase sensitivity with two-mode squeezed coherent state based on a mach-zehnder interferom e- ter ,Opt. Express 31, 27735 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    C. K. Andersen and K. Mølmer, Squeezing of collective excita- tions in spin ensembles, Phys. Rev. A 86, 043831 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Jeong, J

    H. Jeong, J. Lee, and M. S. Kim, Dynamics of nonlocal- ity for a two-mode squeezed state in a thermal environment, Phys. Rev. A 61, 052101 (2000)

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    Pontin, M

    A. Pontin, M. Bonaldi, A. Borrielli, L. Marconi, F. Mari no, G. Pandraud, G. A. Prodi, P . M. Sarro, E. Serra, and F. Marin, Dynamical two-mode squeezing of ther- mal fluctuations in a cavity optomechanical system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 103601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    D. I. Herman, M. Walsh, M. K. Kreider, N. Lordi, E. J. Tsao, A. J. Lind, M. Heyrich, J. Combes, J. Gen- est, and S. A. Diddams, Squeezed dual-comb spectroscopy, Science 387, 653 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    T.-W. Mao, Q. Liu, X.-W. Li, J.-H. Cao, F. Chen, W.-X. Xu, M. K. Tey, Y .-X. Huang, and L. Y ou,Quantum-enhanced sens- ing by echoing spin-nematic squeezing in atomic bose–einst ein condensate, Nat. Phys. 19, 1585 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Y ou and Y

    X. Y ou and Y . Li, Quantum entanglement via a controllable four-wave-mixing mechanism in an optomechanical system, Phys. Rev. A 100, 053842 (2019) . 11

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Kim and A

    S. Kim and A. M. Marino, Generation of 87rb reso- nant bright two-mode squeezed light with four-wave mixing, Opt. Express 26, 33366 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Qi and J

    S.-f. Qi and J. Jing, Kerr-magnon-assisted asymptotic stationary photon-phonon squeezing, Phys. Rev. A 111, 013708 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    A.-L. E. R¨ omling and A. Kamra, Quantum sensing of antiferromagnetic magnon two-mode squeezed vacuum, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174410 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Wuhrer, N

    D. Wuhrer, N. Rohling, and W. Belzig, Theory of quantum en- tanglement and structure of the two-mode squeezed antiferr o- magnetic magnon vacuum, Phys. Rev. B 105, 054406 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Julsgaard, A

    B. Julsgaard, A. Kozhekin, and E. S. Polzik, Experi- mental long-lived entanglement of two macroscopic objects , Nature 413, 400 (2001)

    work page 2001

  33. [33]

    Gross, H

    C. Gross, H. Strobel, E. Nicklas, T. Zibold, N. Bar-Gill , G. Kurizki, and M. K. Oberthaler, Atomic homodyne de- tection of continuous-variable entangled twin-atom state s, Nature 480, 219 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    E. M. Bookjans, C. D. Hamley, and M. S. Chapman, Strong quantum spin correlations observed in atomic spin mixing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 210406 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    A. Qu, B. Evrard, J. Dalibard, and F. Gerbier, Probing spin correlations in a bose-einstein condensate near the single-atom level, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 033401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    K. Kim, J. Hur, S. Huh, S. Choi, and J.-y. Choi, Emission of spin-correlated matter-wave jets from spinor bose-einstein con- densates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 043401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    W. S. Leong, M. Xin, Z. Chen, Y . Wang, and S.-Y . Lan, Cre- ation of two-mode squeezed states in atomic mechanical osci l- lators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 193601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Bilitewski and A

    T. Bilitewski and A. M. Rey, Manipulating growth and propagation of correlations in dipolar multilay- ers: From pair production to bosonic kitaev models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 053001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Sundar, D

    B. Sundar, D. Barberena, A. P . n. Orioli, A. Chu, J. K. Thompson, A. M. Rey, and R. J. Lewis-Swan, Bosonic pair production and squeezing for optical phase measurements in long-lived dipoles coupled to a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 113202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Duha and T

    A. Duha and T. Bilitewski, Two-mode squeezing in floquet-engineered power-law interacting spin models, Phys. Rev. A 109, L061304 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    J. Zhou, M. Li, W. Wang, W. Cai, Z. Hua, Y . Xu, X. Pan, G. Xue, H. Zhang, Y . Song, H. Y u, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Quantum state transfer between su- perconducting cavities via exchange-free interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 220801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Esposito, A

    M. Esposito, A. Ranadive, L. Planat, S. Leger, D. Fraude t, V . Jouanny, O. Buisson, W. Guichard, C. Naud, J. Au- mentado, F. Lecocq, and N. Roch, Observation of two- mode squeezing in a traveling wave parametric amplifier , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 153603 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Andersson, S

    G. Andersson, S. W. Jolin, M. Scigliuzzo, R. Borgani, M. O. Thol´ en, J. Rivera Hern´ andez, V . Shumeiko, D. B. Haviland, and P . Delsing, Squeezing and multimode entanglement of sur- face acoustic wave phonons, PRX Quantum 3, 010312 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    R. Sahu, L. Qiu, W. Hease, G. Arnold, Y . Minoguchi, P . Rabl, and J. M. Fink, Entangling microwaves with light, Science 380, 718 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    J. D. Thompson, B. M. Zwickl, A. M. Jayich, F. Marquardt, S. M. Girvin, and J. G. E. Harris, Strong dispersive cou- pling of a high-finesse cavity to a micromechanical membrane , Nature 452, 72 (2008)

    work page 2008

  46. [46]

    Eshaqi-Sani, S

    N. Eshaqi-Sani, S. Zippilli, and D. Vitali, Nonre- ciprocal conversion between radio-frequency and op- tical photons with an optoelectromechanical system, Phys. Rev. A 106, 032606 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Bochmann, A

    J. Bochmann, A. V ainsencher, D. D. Awschalom, and A. N. Cleland, Nanomechanical coupling between microwave and op- tical photons, Nat. Phys. 9, 712 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    Khalifa, P

    M. Khalifa, P . S. Kirwin, J. F. Y oung, and J. Salfi, Robust microwave-optical photon conversion using cavity modes strongly hybridized with a color center ensemble, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 103 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Meesala, D

    S. Meesala, D. Lake, S. Wood, P . Chiappina, C. Zhong, A. D . Beyer, M. D. Shaw, L. Jiang, and O. Painter, Quantum en- tanglement between optical and microwave photonic qubits, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031055 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Zhong, X

    C. Zhong, X. Han, and L. Jiang, Microwave and optical entan- glement for quantum transduction with electro-optomechan ics, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 054061 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Barzanjeh, S

    S. Barzanjeh, S. Guha, C. Weedbrook, D. Vitali, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Pirandola, Microwave quantum illumination, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 080503 (2015)

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    R. W. Andrews, R. W. Peterson, T. P . Purdy, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, C. A. Regal, and K. W. Lehnert, Bidirectional and efficient conversion between microwave and optical ligh t, Nat. Phys. 10, 321 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Forsch, R

    M. Forsch, R. Stockill, A. Wallucks, I. Marinkovi´ c, C. G¨ artner, R. A. Norte, F. van Otten, A. Fiore, K. Srini- vasan, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Microwave-to-optics conversion using a mechanical oscillator in its quantum ground state, Nat. Phys. 16, 69 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Ghorbani, A

    N. Ghorbani, A. Motazedifard, and M. H. Naderi, Ef- fects of quadratic optomechanical coupling on bipartite en - tanglements, mechanical ground-state cooling, and mechan i- cal quadrature squeezing in an electro-optomechanical sys tem, Phys. Rev. A 111, 013524 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Moaddel Haghighi, N

    I. Moaddel Haghighi, N. Malossi, R. Natali, G. Di Giuseppe, and D. Vitali, Sensitivity-bandwidth limit in a multimode optoelectromechanical transducer , Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 034031 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    Kalita, S

    S. Kalita, S. Shah, and A. K. Sarma, Significant op- toelectrical entanglement and mechanical squeezing in a multimodulated optoelectromechanical system, Phys. Rev. A 106, 043501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Barzanjeh, M

    S. Barzanjeh, M. Abdi, G. J. Milburn, P . Tombesi, and D. Vitali, Reversible optical-to-microwave quantum interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 130503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    Vitali, P

    D. Vitali, P . Tombesi, M. J. Woolley, A. C. Doherty, and G . J. Milburn, Entangling a nanomechanical resonator and a super- conducting microwave cavity, Phys. Rev. A 76, 042336 (2007)

    work page 2007

  59. [59]

    Wang and A

    Y .-D. Wang and A. A. Clerk, Reservoir- engineered entanglement in optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 253601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  60. [60]

    Tian, Robust photon entanglement via quan- tum interference in optomechanical interfaces, Phys

    L. Tian, Robust photon entanglement via quan- tum interference in optomechanical interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 233602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    Q. Cai, J. Liao, and Q. Zhou, Entangling two microwave modes via optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 100, 042330 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Schmidt, M

    M. Schmidt, M. Ludwig, and F. Marquardt, Optomechanical circuits for nanomechanical continuous variable quantum s tate processing, New J. Phys. 14, 125005 (2012)

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    T. A. Palomaki, J. W. Harlow, J. D. Teufel, R. W. Sim- monds, and K. W. Lehnert, Coherent state transfer be- 12 tween itinerant microwave fields and a mechanical oscillato r , Nature 495, 210 (2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [65]

    T. A. Palomaki, J. D. Teufel, R. W. Simmonds, and K. W. Lehnert, Entangling mechanical motion with microwave fields, Science 342, 710 (2013)

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    E. E. Wollman, C. U. Lei, A. J. Weinstein, J. Suh, A. Kro- nwald, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and K. C. Schwab, Quantum squeezing of motion in a mechanical resonator , Science 349, 952 (2015)

    work page 2015

  67. [67]

    Fogliano, B

    F. Fogliano, B. Besga, A. Reigue, P . Heringlake, L. Merc ier de L´ epinay, C. V aneph, J. Reichel, B. Pigeau, and O. Ar- cizet, Mapping the cavity optomechanical interaction with subwavelength-sized ultrasensitive nanomechanical forc e sen- sors, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021009 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    Shen, G.-T

    Z. Shen, G.-T. Xu, M. Zhang, Y .-L. Zhang, Y . Wang, C.- Z. Chai, C.-L. Zou, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Co- herent coupling between phonons, magnons, and photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 243601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  69. [69]

    Y u and F

    D. Y u and F. V ollmer, Active optomechanics, Commun. Phys. 5, 61 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    Wang and S.-f

    C. Wang and S.-f. Qi, Dynamically near-stable two-mode squeezing in optomechanical systems, Phys. Lett. A 573, 131372 (2026)

    work page 2026

  71. [71]

    Zhang, J

    W.-Z. Zhang, J. Cheng, W.-D. Li, and L. Zhou, Op- tomechanical cooling in the non-markovian regime, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063853 (2016)

    work page 2016

  72. [72]

    Tang and H

    J. Tang and H. Z. Shen, Non-markovian frequency conversion between optical and microwave photons with magnetomechan- ical transduction, Phys. Rev. A 110, 043706 (2024)

    work page 2024

  73. [73]

    Gribben, D

    D. Gribben, D. M. Rouse, J. Iles-Smith, A. Strat- hearn, H. Maguire, P . Kirton, A. Nazir, E. M. Gauger, and B. W. Lovett, Exact dynamics of nonadditive en- vironments in non-markovian open quantum systems, PRX Quantum 3, 010321 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Cheng, W.-Z

    J. Cheng, W.-Z. Zhang, L. Zhou, and W. Zhang, Preservation macroscopic entanglement of optomechanical systems in non - markovian environment, Sci. Rep. 6, 23678 (2016)

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    Gr¨ oblacher, A

    S. Gr¨ oblacher, A. Trubarov, N. Prigge, G. D. Cole, M. Aspelmeyer, and J. Eisert, Observation of non-markovian micromechanical brownian motion, Nat. Commun. 6, 7606 (2015)

    work page 2015

  76. [76]

    Ying-Hua, H

    J. Ying-Hua, H. Ju-ju, H. Jian-Hua, and K. Qiang, Optimal control-based states transfer for non-markovian quantum s ys- tem, Physica E 81, 77 (2016)

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    Khari, Z

    S. Khari, Z. Rahmani, A. Daeichian, and H. Mehri-Dehnav i, State transfer and maintenance for non-markovian open quan - tum systems in a hybrid environment via lyapunov control method, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 533 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Qi and J

    S.-f. Qi and J. Jing, Magnon-assisted photon-phonon conversion in the presence of structured environments, Phys. Rev. A 103, 043704 (2021)

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    Xiong, X

    B. Xiong, X. Li, S.-L. Chao, and L. Zhou, Optome- chanical quadrature squeezing in the non-markovian regime , Opt. Lett. 43, 6053 (2018)

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    Zhang, H

    Z. Zhang, H. Fu, and J. Wang, Nonequilibrium-induced en- hancement of dynamical quantum coherence and entanglement of spin arrays, Phys. Rev. B 95, 144306 (2017)

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.