arxiv: 2604.24305 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Role of heavy neutral lepton in lepton number violating B meson decays

Dhiren Panda , Manas Kumar Mohapatra , Rukmani Mohanta

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 03:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords heavy neutral leptonslepton number violationB meson decaysbranching ratiosbeyond standard modelon-shell mediation

0 comments

The pith

Heavy neutral leptons mediate lepton-number violating B and B_c decays with branching ratios up to 10^{-8}.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how heavy neutral leptons beyond the Standard Model can appear in B meson decays that violate lepton number. It constrains the mass and mixing parameters of these leptons from data on B to mu N and B to tau N decays. It then computes the rates for several Delta L=2 processes such as B_c^- to pi^+ mu^- mu^- and B_c^- to J/psi pi^+ mu^- mu^-, with the heavy neutral leptons produced on-shell. For benchmark values |U_mu N|^2 = 10^{-6} and M_N = 2-3 GeV allowed by data, the branching ratios range from O(10^{-13}) to O(10^{-8}), with the largest values in B_c to pi mu mu and strong suppression in the J/psi channel.

Core claim

Using constraints from B to lepton N decays, the branching ratios for lepton-number violating B and B_c decays mediated by on-shell heavy neutral leptons reach up to O(10^{-8}) for |U_mu N|^2 = 10^{-6} and M_N = 2-3 GeV, with B_c^- to pi^+ mu^- mu^- having the largest enhancement and B_c^- to J/psi pi^+ mu^- mu^- being strongly suppressed.

What carries the argument

On-shell heavy neutral leptons (HNLs) acting as mediators in Delta L=2 B meson decay channels, with production and decay rates set by their mass and mixing parameters with active neutrinos.

If this is right

The predicted branching ratios lie in ranges that future B-physics experiments can probe.
B_c decay modes offer greater sensitivity to these HNL effects than ordinary B modes.
The strong channel dependence allows experiments to target specific final states for enhanced signals.
Absence of signals in these channels would tighten the allowed regions for HNL mass and mixing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Searches at LHCb or Belle II for same-sign muon pairs in B_c decays could directly test these rates.
Confirmation would strengthen the case for HNLs as a source of lepton number violation.
The same on-shell mediation approach could be applied to other meson systems or lepton flavors.

Load-bearing premise

Heavy neutral leptons exist in the GeV mass range, are produced on-shell in B decays, and mediate the lepton number violating processes with mixing values taken from regions allowed by B to mu N and B to tau N data.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the branching ratio for B_c^- to pi^+ mu^- mu^- that lies well outside the predicted O(10^{-13}) to O(10^{-8}) range for the benchmark |U_mu N|^2 = 10^{-6} and M_N = 2-3 GeV would falsify the central prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24305 by Dhiren Panda, Manas Kumar Mohapatra, Rukmani Mohanta.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Feynman diagrams for LNV meson decays with pos view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Confidence regions for the HNL mixing parameter view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Confidence regions for view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Comparison of limits and predictions for the considered decay modes. For view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study the phenomenology of heavy neutral leptons (HNLs) in $B$-meson decays as probes of physics beyond the Standard Model. Focusing on the leptonic channels $B \to \mu N$ and $B \to \tau N$, we constrain the allowed regions in the $M_N$--$|U_{\ell N}|^2$ plane using current experimental data. Using these constraints, we investigate lepton-number violating ($\Delta L=2$) processes mediated by on-shell HNLs, including $B_{(c)}^- \to \pi^+ \mu^- \mu^-$ and $B_c^- \to J/\psi\, \pi^+ \mu^- \mu^-$. For benchmark values $|U_{\mu N}|^2 = 10^{-6}$ and $M_N = 2$-- $3\,\mathrm{GeV}$, the predicted branching ratios lie in the range $\mathcal{O}(10^{-13})$--$\mathcal{O}(10^{-8})$. Among the channels, $B_c^- \to \pi^+ \mu^- \mu^-$ shows the largest enhancement, while $B_c^- \to J/\psi\, \pi^+ \mu^- \mu^-$ is strongly suppressed. These results indicate a clear channel dependence, with $B_c$ modes providing enhanced sensitivity to HNL effects and offering promising avenues for future searches of lepton number violation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper applies standard on-shell HNL mediation and existing two-body constraints to give benchmark branching ratios for a few LNV B and B_c channels, with B_c to pi mu mu largest at O(10^{-8}).

read the letter

The paper takes mixing angles allowed by B to l N data and plugs them into calculations for Delta L=2 modes like B_c^- to pi^+ mu^- mu^- and the J/psi version. For |U_muN|^2 = 10^{-6} and M_N = 2-3 GeV the branching ratios fall between 10^{-13} and 10^{-8}, with the plain pi mode enhanced and the J/psi one suppressed by kinematics and matrix elements. They also include the non-B_c channels for comparison. This produces a clear channel hierarchy that follows directly from phase space and standard form factors under the narrow-width approximation. The approach stays within established HNL phenomenology without new assumptions or exotic inputs. The results are transparent enough that the scaling with |U|^2 is obvious and the numerical outputs can be reproduced from the cited form-factor parametrizations. The main limitation is that everything remains benchmark-dependent; the three-body rates scale linearly with the chosen mixing and mass, so they function as illustrative targets rather than independent predictions or new constraints. Off-shell HNL contributions and uncertainty bands on the form factors are not explored in detail. The work is aimed at experimental groups scanning for lepton-number violation in B_c decays at LHCb or Belle II, where the concrete numbers could help prioritize channels. Theorists already familiar with HNL literature will find the extension useful for quick reference but not conceptually new. I would send it for peer review because the calculations are standard, the outputs are checkable, and the channel comparison adds practical value even if the framework is not novel.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines heavy neutral leptons (HNLs) as mediators of lepton-number violating (ΔL=2) B and B_c meson decays. It first derives constraints on the mixing parameters |U_ℓN|^2 (ℓ=μ,τ) and M_N from existing data on the two-body decays B→ℓN. These constraints are then used to compute branching ratios for the three-body LNV channels B^-→π^+μ^-μ^-, B_c^-→π^+μ^-μ^- and B_c^-→J/ψ π^+ μ^- μ^- assuming on-shell HNL exchange. For the benchmark point |U_μN|^2=10^{-6} and M_N=2–3 GeV the predicted branching ratios fall in the range O(10^{-13})–O(10^{-8}), with the largest values in the B_c→πμμ channel and strong suppression in the J/ψ mode.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work supplies concrete, channel-dependent benchmarks that can directly inform experimental searches for LNV at LHCb and Belle II. The observation that B_c modes are more sensitive than ordinary B modes is a useful phenomenological insight. The calculations rely on standard narrow-width and form-factor techniques already employed in the HNL literature, so the main value lies in the updated constraints and the explicit comparison across channels rather than in novel methodology.

minor comments (3)

The abstract and main text quote an overall branching-ratio range O(10^{-13})–O(10^{-8}) but do not tabulate the individual values for each channel at the benchmark points; a compact table would improve readability and allow direct comparison with experimental sensitivities.
The text states that constraints are taken from 'current experimental data' on B→μN and B→τN; explicit citation of the specific limits (e.g., LHCb or Belle upper bounds) and a brief description of how they are translated into the |U_ℓN|^2–M_N plane would strengthen the presentation.
The suppression of the B_c^-→J/ψ π^+ μ^- μ^- channel is attributed to kinematics and hadronic matrix elements; a short quantitative remark on the relative size of the form-factor suppression versus phase-space effects would clarify the origin of the channel dependence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment, including the recommendation for minor revision. The referee summary accurately describes the scope, methods, and main findings of our work on HNL-mediated lepton-number violating B and B_c decays. We appreciate the recognition that the channel-dependent branching ratio benchmarks and the enhanced sensitivity of B_c modes constitute useful phenomenological input for LHCb and Belle II searches.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The derivation constrains |U_ℓN|^2 from experimental limits on B → ℓN two-body decays, then evaluates LNV branching ratios at benchmark points inside the allowed region using standard narrow-width approximation, phase-space integration, and conventional hadronic form factors. These steps are independent calculations; the BRs scale with the chosen |U|^2 by the model's Feynman rules but are not fitted to or defined by the LNV observables themselves. No self-citation load-bearing step, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results occurs. The paper is self-contained against external data benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central results rest on benchmark choices for HNL parameters and the assumption that on-shell HNLs mediate the listed ΔL=2 decays; no new independent evidence for the HNL itself is supplied.

free parameters (2)

M_N = 2-3 GeV
Benchmark mass value (2-3 GeV) chosen for numerical predictions of branching ratios.
|U_μN|^2 = 10^{-6}
Benchmark mixing parameter squared (10^{-6}) chosen for numerical predictions of branching ratios.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Heavy neutral leptons can be produced on-shell in B-meson decays and mediate lepton-number violating (ΔL=2) processes.
Standard assumption in HNL phenomenology invoked to connect the constrained mixing region to the predicted branching ratios.

invented entities (1)

Heavy neutral lepton (HNL) no independent evidence
purpose: Mediator particle enabling lepton-number violating B-meson decays
Postulated beyond-Standard-Model state whose existence is assumed rather than demonstrated by new evidence in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5565 in / 1516 out tokens · 46534 ms · 2026-05-08T03:13:05.131477+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[1]

Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,

G. Aadet al., “Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 716, pp. 1–29, 2012

2012
[2]

Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,

S. Chatrchyanet al., “Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 716, pp. 30–61, 2012

2012
[3]

Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos,

Y. Fukudaet al., “Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 81, pp. 1562–1567, 1998

1998
[4]

Direct evidence for neutrino fla- vor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,

Q. R. Ahmadet al., “Direct evidence for neutrino fla- vor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 89, p. 011301, 2002

2002
[5]

First results from KamLAND: Ev- idence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance,

K. Eguchiet al., “First results from KamLAND: Ev- idence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 90, p. 021802, 2003

2003
[6]

Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay,

F. P. Anet al., “Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 108, p. 171803, 2012

2012
[7]

Lepton number violation by heavy Majorana neutrino inBdecays,

T. Asaka and H. Ishida, “Lepton number violation by heavy Majorana neutrino inBdecays,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 763, pp. 393–396, 2016

2016
[8]

Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification,

M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, “Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 174, pp. 45–47, 1986

1986
[9]

TheνMSM, dark mat- ter and baryon asymmetry of the universe,

T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov, “TheνMSM, dark mat- ter and baryon asymmetry of the universe,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 620, pp. 17–26, 2005

2005
[10]

Heavy ster- ile neutrinos and supernova explosions,

G. M. Fuller, A. Kusenko, and K. Petraki, “Heavy ster- ile neutrinos and supernova explosions,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 670, pp. 281–284, 2009

2009
[11]

Sterile-neutrinos as dark matter,

S. Dodelson and L. M. Widrow, “Sterile-neutrinos as dark matter,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 72, pp. 17–20, 1994

1994
[12]

Majorana neutrinos and same sign dilepton production at LHC and in rare meson decays,

A. Ali, A. V. Borisov, and N. B. Zamorin, “Majorana neutrinos and same sign dilepton production at LHC and in rare meson decays,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 21, pp. 123– 132, 2001. 8

2001
[13]

Upper bounds on lepton-number violating processes,

A. Atre, V. Barger, and T. Han, “Upper bounds on lepton-number violating processes,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 71, p. 113014, 2005

2005
[14]

Hadronic structure aspects of K+ —>pi- + l+(1) + l+(2) decays,

M. A. Ivanov and S. G. Kovalenko, “Hadronic structure aspects of K+ —>pi- + l+(1) + l+(2) decays,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 71, p. 053004, 2005

2005
[15]

Sterile neutri- nos in lepton number and lepton flavor violating decays,

J. C. Helo, S. Kovalenko, and I. Schmidt, “Sterile neutri- nos in lepton number and lepton flavor violating decays,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 853, pp. 80–104, 2011

2011
[16]

Probing Majorana neutrinos in rareKandD, D s, B, Bc meson decays,

G. Cvetic, C. Dib, S. K. Kang, and C. S. Kim, “Probing Majorana neutrinos in rareKandD, D s, B, Bc meson decays,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 82, p. 053010, 2010

2010
[17]

Lepton-Number Violat- ing Decays of Heavy Mesons,

J.-M. Zhang and G.-L. Wang, “Lepton-Number Violat- ing Decays of Heavy Mesons,”Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 71, p. 1715, 2011

2011
[18]

Search for Majorna Neutrino Signal inB c Meson Rare Decay,

S.-S. Bao, H.-L. Li, Z.-G. Si, and Y.-B. Yang, “Search for Majorna Neutrino Signal inB c Meson Rare Decay,” Commun. Theor. Phys., vol. 59, pp. 472–478, 2013

2013
[19]

Study Majorana Neutrino Contribution to B-meson Semi-leptonic Rare Decays,

Y. Wang, S.-S. Bao, Z.-H. Li, N. Zhu, and Z.-G. Si, “Study Majorana Neutrino Contribution to B-meson Semi-leptonic Rare Decays,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 736, pp. 428–432, 2014

2014
[20]

The Search for Heavy Majorana Neutrinos,

A. Atre, T. Han, S. Pascoli, and B. Zhang, “The Search for Heavy Majorana Neutrinos,”JHEP, vol. 05, p. 030, 2009

2009
[21]

Sterile neu- trinos in tau lepton decays,

V. Gribanov, S. Kovalenko, and I. Schmidt, “Sterile neu- trinos in tau lepton decays,”Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 607, pp. 355–368, 2001

2001
[22]

Lepton number violation in top quark and neutral B meson de- cays,

N. Quintero, G. Lopez Castro, and D. Delepine, “Lepton number violation in top quark and neutral B meson de- cays,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 84, p. 096011, 2011. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 079905 (2012)]

2011
[23]

Bounding resonant Ma- jorana neutrinos from four-body B and D decays,

G. L. Castro and N. Quintero, “Bounding resonant Ma- jorana neutrinos from four-body B and D decays,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 87, p. 077901, 2013

2013
[24]

Lepton number vi- olating four-body tau lepton decays,

G. Lopez Castro and N. Quintero, “Lepton number vi- olating four-body tau lepton decays,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 85, p. 076006, 2012. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 079904 (2012)]

2012
[25]

Lepton number vi- olation in D meson decay,

H.-R. Dong, F. Feng, and H.-B. Li, “Lepton number vi- olation in D meson decay,”Chin. Phys. C, vol. 39, no. 1, p. 013101, 2015

2015
[26]

Lepton-number violating four-body decays of heavy mesons,

H. Yuan, T. Wang, G.-L. Wang, W.-L. Ju, and J.-M. Zhang, “Lepton-number violating four-body decays of heavy mesons,”JHEP, vol. 08, p. 066, 2013

2013
[27]

Lepton number vio- lation in tau lepton decays,

G. Lopez Castro and N. Quintero, “Lepton number vio- lation in tau lepton decays,”Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl., vol. 253-255, pp. 12–15, 2014

2014
[28]

Heavy Sterile Neutrinos in Tau Decays and the MiniBooNE Anomaly,

C. Dib, J. C. Helo, M. Hirsch, S. Kovalenko, and I. Schmidt, “Heavy Sterile Neutrinos in Tau Decays and the MiniBooNE Anomaly,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 85, p. 011301, 2012

2012
[29]

Search for Lepton-number-violating B+ →D −l+l′+ Decays,

O. Seonet al., “Search for Lepton-number-violating B+ →D −l+l′+ Decays,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 84, p. 071106, 2011

2011
[30]

Search for Majorana neutrinos inB − → π+µ−µ− decays,

R. Aaijet al., “Search for Majorana neutrinos inB − → π+µ−µ− decays,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 112, no. 13, p. 131802, 2014

2014
[31]

Search for the lepton number violating decaysB + →π −µ+µ+ andB + →K −µ+µ+,

R. Aaijet al., “Search for the lepton number violating decaysB + →π −µ+µ+ andB + →K −µ+µ+,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 108, p. 101601, 2012

2012
[32]

Search for lepton-number violating B+→X−ℓ+ℓ’+ decays,

J. P. Leeset al., “Search for lepton-number violating B+→X−ℓ+ℓ’+ decays,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 89, no. 1, p. 011102, 2014

2014
[33]

Search for rare and forbidden charm meson decays D0 —>V lepton+ lepton- and h h lepton- lepton,

E. M. Aitalaet al., “Search for rare and forbidden charm meson decays D0 —>V lepton+ lepton- and h h lepton- lepton,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 86, pp. 3969–3972, 2001

2001
[34]

Sensitivity to Majorana neutrinos in ∆L= 2 decays ofB c meson at LHCb,

D. Milanes, N. Quintero, and C. E. Vera, “Sensitivity to Majorana neutrinos in ∆L= 2 decays ofB c meson at LHCb,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 93, no. 9, p. 094026, 2016

2016
[35]

Search for lepton-number-violatingB − → D(∗)+µ−µ− decays,

R. Aaijet al., “Search for lepton-number-violatingB − → D(∗)+µ−µ− decays,” 2026. arXiv:2601.07657 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2026
[36]

Anomalies in (semi)-leptonicBdecaysB ± →τ ±ν,B ± →Dτ ±ν andB ± →D ∗τ ±ν, and possible resolution with sterile neutrino,

G. Cvetiˇ c, F. Halzen, C. S. Kim, and S. Oh, “Anomalies in (semi)-leptonicBdecaysB ± →τ ±ν,B ± →Dτ ±ν andB ± →D ∗τ ±ν, and possible resolution with sterile neutrino,”Chin. Phys. C, vol. 41, no. 11, p. 113102, 2017

2017
[37]

Measurement of B+→τ+ντbranching fraction with a hadronic tagging method at Belle II,

I. Adachiet al., “Measurement of B+→τ+ντbranching fraction with a hadronic tagging method at Belle II,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 7, p. 072002, 2025

2025
[38]

Study ofB + →µ +νµ decays at Belle and Belle II,

M. Abumusabhet al., “Study ofB + →µ +νµ decays at Belle and Belle II,” 2 2026

2026
[39]

Pseudo- Dirac Neutrinos in the New Standard Model,

A. de Gouvea, W.-C. Huang, and J. Jenkins, “Pseudo- Dirac Neutrinos in the New Standard Model,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 80, p. 073007, 2009

2009
[40]

See-saw energy scale and the LSND anomaly,

A. de Gouvea, “See-saw energy scale and the LSND anomaly,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 72, p. 033005, 2005

2005
[41]

Probing oscillations into sterile neutrinos with cos- mology, astrophysics and experiments,

M. Cirelli, G. Marandella, A. Strumia, and F. Vis- sani, “Probing oscillations into sterile neutrinos with cos- mology, astrophysics and experiments,”Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 708, pp. 215–267, 2005

2005
[42]

How to find neutral leptons of theνMSM?,

D. Gorbunov and M. Shaposhnikov, “How to find neutral leptons of theνMSM?,”JHEP, vol. 10, p. 015, 2007. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 101 (2013)]

2007
[43]

Restrictions on the life- time of sterile neutrinos from primordial nucleosynthe- sis,

O. Ruchayskiy and A. Ivashko, “Restrictions on the life- time of sterile neutrinos from primordial nucleosynthe- sis,”JCAP, vol. 10, p. 014, 2012

2012
[44]

Limits on the mixing of tau neutrino to heavy neutrinos,

J. Orloff, A. N. Rozanov, and C. Santoni, “Limits on the mixing of tau neutrino to heavy neutrinos,”Phys. Lett. B, vol. 550, pp. 8–15, 2002

2002
[45]

Search for neutral heavy leptons pro- duced in Z decays,

P. Abreuet al., “Search for neutral heavy leptons pro- duced in Z decays,”Z. Phys. C, vol. 74, pp. 57–71, 1997. [Erratum: Z. Phys. C75, 580 (1997)]

1997
[46]

Effects of new leptons in Electroweak Precision Data,

F. del Aguila, J. de Blas, and M. Perez-Victoria, “Effects of new leptons in Electroweak Precision Data,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 78, p. 013010, 2008

2008
[47]

Improving Electro-Weak Fits with TeV- scale Sterile Neutrinos,

E. Akhmedov, A. Kartavtsev, M. Lindner, L. Michaels, and J. Smirnov, “Improving Electro-Weak Fits with TeV- scale Sterile Neutrinos,”JHEP, vol. 05, p. 081, 2013

2013
[48]

Electroweak limits on physics beyond the Standard Model,

J. de Blas, “Electroweak limits on physics beyond the Standard Model,”EPJ Web Conf., vol. 60, p. 19008, 2013

2013
[49]

Search for neutral heavy leptons in a high-energy neutrino beam,

A. Vaitaitiset al., “Search for neutral heavy leptons in a high-energy neutrino beam,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 83, pp. 4943–4946, 1999

1999
[50]

Search for heavy neutrinos at Belle,

D. Liventsevet al., “Search for heavy neutrinos at Belle,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 87, no. 7, p. 071102, 2013. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 099903 (2017)]

2013
[51]

Search for heavy neutrinos inK + →µ +νH decays,

A. V. Artamonovet al., “Search for heavy neutrinos inK + →µ +νH decays,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 91, no. 5, p. 052001, 2015. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 059903 (2015)]

2015
[52]

Semileptonic B(c) decay and heavy quark spin symmetry,

E. E. Jenkins, M. E. Luke, A. V. Manohar, and M. J. Savage, “Semileptonic B(c) decay and heavy quark spin symmetry,”Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 390, pp. 463–473, 1993

1993
[53]

Using heavy quark spin symmetry in semileptonicB c decays,

P. Colangelo and F. De Fazio, “Using heavy quark spin symmetry in semileptonicB c decays,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 61, p. 034012, 2000. 9

2000
[54]

Review of particle physics,

K. Olive, “Review of particle physics,”Chinese Physics C, vol. 38, p. 090001, aug 2014

2014