pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25718 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chemical transformation of MgH2/V2O5 composite to Mg-V-O rock salt and its influence on the electrochemical Li conversion and hydrogen storage characteristics of MgH2

D. Pukazhselvan , Ihsan Caha , Francisco J.A. Loureiro , Francis Leonard Deepak , Catarina de Lemos , Aliaksandr L. Shaula , Sergey M. Mikhalev , Duncan Paul Fagg This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords magnesium hydridevanadium oxiderock salt phaselithium conversioncharge transferelectrochemical impedancehydrogen storage
0
0 comments X

The pith

Vanadium oxide reacts with magnesium hydride to form a rock salt phase that boosts initial lithium capacity but causes poor reversibility through charge transfer limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies the chemical changes when vanadium oxide is added to magnesium hydride and how those changes affect lithium conversion reactions. Ball milling creates a combined magnesium-vanadium oxide with a rock salt crystal structure, showing direct interaction between the two materials. Even a small amount of this additive produces a high initial discharge capacity in lithium coin cells, yet recharge remains limited. Post-use tests confirm magnesium hydride is still present after cycling, and impedance measurements using relaxation time analysis show that electrolyte breakdown is not the main problem. Instead, slow charge transfer at the electrode is the bottleneck and varies with the additive amount.

Core claim

The presence of a small amount of vanadium oxide additive in magnesium hydride leads to formation of a magnesium-vanadium oxide rock salt phase during processing, which in turn produces high initial lithium discharge capacity in electrochemical cells while restricting rechargeability because of slow charge transfer kinetics rather than volume expansion or electrolyte degradation.

What carries the argument

The rock salt structured Mg-V-O phase formed by chemical interaction between MgH2 and V2O5 during ball milling, which modifies the electrode interface and controls the lithium reaction pathway.

If this is right

  • Small amounts of the rock salt phase enable high initial lithium discharge capacities in coin cells.
  • Magnesium hydride persists after use, showing that volume expansion during cycling is not the source of irreversibility.
  • Electrolyte degradation is ruled out as the dominant issue by relaxation-time impedance analysis.
  • Charge transfer processes are slow and depend on the exact composition of the oxide additive.
  • Better electrode-electrolyte compatibility is required to improve recharge performance in this system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Adjusting the vanadium oxide amount or particle size could reduce charge transfer resistance and improve cycling stability.
  • The same rock salt formation might appear with other metal oxide additives in hydride systems, suggesting a general route to modify electrochemical behavior.
  • Testing alternative lithium electrolytes could isolate whether the charge transfer limit can be overcome without changing the composite.

Load-bearing premise

That the rock salt phase formation and the charge transfer limitation identified by impedance analysis are the main causes of the high initial capacity and irreversibility, with post-use checks having ruled out volume expansion and electrolyte issues.

What would settle it

An experiment in which the rock salt phase is prevented from forming, for example by using a different mixing method, yet the high initial capacity and poor reversibility still appear would show that this phase is not the controlling factor.

read the original abstract

This study investigates the lithium conversion behavior of a hydrogen storage material based on vanadium oxide added magnesium hydride. To understand the chemical interaction between vanadium oxide and magnesium hydride, detailed X ray diffraction and X ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses were performed on ball milled composites with varying compositions. The results confirm the formation of a combined magnesium vanadium oxide with a rock salt structure, indicating strong chemical interaction between the components. It is further shown that the presence of a small amount of this oxide additive significantly influences the lithium reaction with magnesium hydride, leading to a high initial discharge capacity and limited recharge capacity in lithium ion coin cells. Post use analyses confirm the presence of magnesium hydride, suggesting that volume expansion is not responsible for the observed irreversibility. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy using differential function of relaxation times indicates that electrolyte degradation is not a major issue. Instead, slow charge transfer processes are identified as the limiting factor, and these are sensitive to the composition of the additive. These findings highlight that improving electrode and electrolyte compatibility is essential for enhancing performance in this system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper examines ball-milled MgH2/V2O5 composites and reports that V2O5 addition induces formation of a Mg-V-O rock-salt phase, as confirmed by XRD and XPS. Small amounts of the additive are shown to produce high initial Li-conversion discharge capacities in coin cells but limited rechargeability. Post-cycling XRD detects residual MgH2, which the authors interpret as evidence that volume expansion does not cause the observed irreversibility. EIS spectra analyzed via the differential relaxation time (DRT) method indicate that electrolyte degradation is minor while slow charge-transfer kinetics, modulated by additive composition, are rate-limiting. The work concludes that electrode-electrolyte compatibility must be improved for practical performance.

Significance. If the attribution of irreversibility to charge-transfer limitations holds after additional characterization, the study offers useful insight into how oxide additives chemically modify MgH2 to alter its Li-conversion pathway and kinetic bottlenecks. The combination of structural (XRD/XPS), post-use, and DRT-EIS analyses provides a coherent experimental framework for probing interface effects in conversion-type hydrogen-storage materials. This could inform design of hybrid Mg-based anodes or solid-state systems where additive-induced phase changes control reversibility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Post-use analyses and irreversibility discussion] Post-use analyses (abstract and results): the inference that detection of MgH2 by post-cycling XRD rules out volume-expansion-driven mechanical degradation as a contributor to limited recharge capacity is not sufficiently supported. Partial or localized conversion of MgH2 grains can still produce ~30-40% volume change per reacted particle, leading to cracking, loss of electronic percolation, or SEI growth that bulk XRD on remaining crystallites would miss. No quantitative Rietveld phase fractions, particle-size distributions, or post-cycling SEM/TEM morphology data are presented to exclude this pathway, leaving the exclusive attribution to charge-transfer kinetics (via DRT-EIS) under-supported and load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: quantitative discharge capacities, exact additive weight percentages, and any error bars or replicate statistics are omitted, making it difficult to gauge the magnitude and reproducibility of the reported effects.
  2. [EIS and DRT analysis] EIS/DRT section: the manuscript would benefit from explicit description of the DRT inversion method, regularization parameters, and how charge-transfer peaks were assigned versus other processes.
  3. [Experimental methods] Experimental details: full ball-milling parameters, electrode formulation ratios, electrolyte composition, and EIS frequency/amplitude settings should be stated to enable reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below, with proposed revisions to improve the clarity and support of our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Post-use analyses and irreversibility discussion] Post-use analyses (abstract and results): the inference that detection of MgH2 by post-cycling XRD rules out volume-expansion-driven mechanical degradation as a contributor to limited recharge capacity is not sufficiently supported. Partial or localized conversion of MgH2 grains can still produce ~30-40% volume change per reacted particle, leading to cracking, loss of electronic percolation, or SEI growth that bulk XRD on remaining crystallites would miss. No quantitative Rietveld phase fractions, particle-size distributions, or post-cycling SEM/TEM morphology data are presented to exclude this pathway, leaving the exclusive attribution to charge-transfer kinetics (via DRT-EIS) under-supported and load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the presence of residual MgH2 detected by post-cycling XRD does not by itself conclusively exclude localized mechanical degradation or SEI growth in partially converted regions, as bulk XRD on unreacted crystallites could miss such effects. Our interpretation was intended to indicate that the material did not undergo complete conversion (which would be more consistent with dominant mechanical failure), and the DRT-EIS data provide the primary evidence that charge-transfer kinetics are the rate-limiting factor with minor electrolyte degradation. To strengthen the manuscript, we will revise the abstract and relevant results/discussion sections to present a more cautious interpretation that acknowledges the limitations of XRD alone. We will also add quantitative Rietveld refinement of post-cycling XRD phase fractions and include available post-cycling SEM images to assess particle morphology, cracking, or percolation issues. This will better contextualize the role of charge-transfer limitations identified via DRT-EIS. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental claims with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental study using XRD, XPS, ball-milling, coin-cell cycling, and EIS/DRT analysis to characterize MgH2/V2O5 composites and their Li-conversion behavior. No equations, models, parameters fitted to subsets of data, or predictions that reduce to inputs by construction appear in the provided text. Central inferences (e.g., volume expansion ruled out by post-use MgH2 detection, charge-transfer limitation from DRT) rest on direct measurements and post-cycling characterization rather than any self-referential loop or self-citation chain. While the strength of those inferences can be debated on evidentiary grounds, they do not constitute circularity by the enumerated patterns. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a purely experimental study with no theoretical derivations, mathematical models, or fitted parameters. No new entities are postulated; the rock-salt phase is reported as an observed product of the milling process.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5538 in / 1311 out tokens · 69847 ms · 2026-05-07T15:48:27.878485+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    b” for 0.125MgH2+V2O5, “c

    comply well with the i nformation noted for x= 2, 4 and 6 except that free MgH 2 is also present in these compositions. It is understandable because MgH 2 in these composites are in considerably larger quantity than V2O5. One important point to note from these XRD patterns is that no direct diffraction evidence can be found for the presence of V containin...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Incorporation of the additive V ₂O₅ with MgH₂ results in a chemical interaction that leads to the formation of a rock salt phase MgxVyOx+y

    work page

  3. [3]

    The potential at which the reaction occurs is closely identical in both the cases

    As per CV observations, a 5 wt.% of V2O5 and Mg xVyOx+y added MgH 2 electrochemically interacts with M gH2 though a two-step reaction. The potential at which the reaction occurs is closely identical in both the cases

    work page

  4. [4]

    900 mAh/g)

    The first discharge cycle in the case of Mg xVyOx+y added MgH2 containing battery is 1350 mAh/g which is higher than that observed for V2O5 added MgH2 employed battery (i.e. 900 mAh/g) . However, cyclic stability remains a concern in both the cases (employed charge/discharge rate 0.05C)

    work page

  5. [5]

    Post-mortem study though EDX technique confirms the presence of MgH2 in the cycles tested sample, hence loss of MgH2 due to issues like swelling is not likely to be the reason for limited reversibility

    work page

  6. [6]

    NGS - New Generation Storage

    As per the EIS study, the electrolyte presents no degradation issue in the case of V 2O5 and MgxVyOx+y added MgH2 electrodes. However, a sharp increase in charge transfer resistance after a few charge / discharge cycles is a common issue in both the cases. Acknowledgement This article was supported by the projects 2022.09319.PTDC (https://doi.org/10.54499...

    work page doi:10.54499/2022.09319.ptdc 2022

  7. [7]

    A”), (b) 5 wt.% Mg xVyOx+y added MgH2 as anode active material (battery “B

    composite (V2O5 correspond to x=0). Fig.2 XPS (a) survey spectra corresponding to xMgH2+V2O5 (x=0.125, 2 and 4). The V2p and O1s high resolution binding energy profiles obtained for the samples , (b) 0.125MgH2+V2O5, (c) 2MgH2+V2O5 and (d) 4MgH2+V2O5. Fig.3 Cyclic voltammetry profiles corresponding to the battery employing (a) 5 wt.% V2O5 added MgH2 as ano...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Lal, and A

    Jain, I.P., C. Lal, and A. Jain, Hydrogen storage in Mg: A most promising material. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010. 35(10): p. 5133-5144. 11

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Ritter, and B

    Bogdanović, B., A. Ritter, and B. Spliethoff, Active MgH2 Mg Systems for Reversible Chemical Energy Storage. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 1990. 29(3): p. 223-234

    work page 1990

  10. [10]

    Bogdanović, B. and B. Spliethoff, Active MgH2 Mg-systems for hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1987. 12(12): p. 863-873

    work page 1987

  11. [11]

    Hartwig, and B

    Bogdanović, B., T.H. Hartwig, and B. Spliethoff, The development, testing and optimization of energy storage materials based on the MgH2 Mg system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1993. 18(7): p. 575-589

    work page 1993

  12. [12]

    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1995

    Bogdanović, B., et al., A process steam generator based on the high temperature magnesium hydride/magnesium heat storage system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1995. 20(10): p. 811-822

    work page 1995

  13. [13]

    Oumellal, and J

    Aymard, L., Y . Oumellal, and J. -P. Bonnet, Metal hydrides: an innovative and challenging conversion reaction anode for lithium-ion batteries. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 2015. 6: p. 1821-1839

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013

    Meggiolaro, D., et al., Incorporation of Lithium by MgH2: An Ab Initio Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013. 117(44): p. 22467-22477

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Cuevas, and M

    Sartori, S., F. Cuevas, and M. Latroche, Metal hydrides used as negative electrode materials for Li-ion batteries. Applied Physics A, 2016. 122(2): p. 135

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Small Structures, 2024

    Gao, P., et al., Porous Magnesium Hydride Nanoparticles Uniformly Coated by Mg -Based Composites toward Advanced Lithium Storage Performance. Small Structures, 2024. 5(3): p. 2300365

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2021

    Zhong, S., et al., Magnesium hydride nanoparticles anchored on MXene sheets as high capacity anode for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2021. 62: p. 431-439

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Huen, P. and D.B. Ravnsbæk, Insight into Poor Cycling Stability of MgH2 Anodes. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2017. 164(13): p. A3138

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Materials Today Energy, 2017

    Brutti, S., et al., Magnesium hydride as negative electrode active material in lithium cells: A review. Materials Today Energy, 2017. 3: p. 53-59

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017

    El kharbachi, A., et al., Morphology effects in MgH2 anode for lithium ion batteries. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017. 42(35): p. 22551-22556

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Nature Materials, 2008

    Oumellal, Y ., et al., Metal hydrides for lithium-ion batteries. Nature Materials, 2008. 7(11): p. 916-921

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    Advanced Functional Materials, 2007

    Reddy, M.V ., et al., α-Fe2O3 Nanoflakes as an Anode Material for Li-Ion Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials, 2007. 17(15): p. 2792-2799

    work page 2007

  23. [23]

    Materials Chemistry Frontiers, 2017

    Cao, K., et al., Recent progress in conversion reaction metal oxide anodes for Li-ion batteries. Materials Chemistry Frontiers, 2017. 1(11): p. 2213-2242

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Journal of the American Chemic al Society, 2011

    Wang, F., et al., Conversion Reaction Mechanisms in Lithium Ion Batteries: Study of the Binary Metal Fluoride Electrodes. Journal of the American Chemic al Society, 2011. 133(46): p. 18828-18836

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    npj Computational Materials, 2018

    Li, C., et al., Electrochemically driven conversion reaction in fluoride electrodes for energy storage devices. npj Computational Materials, 2018. 4(1): p. 22

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Nano Today, 2014

    Xu, X., et al., Nanostructured transition metal sulfides for lithium ion batteries: Progress and challenges. Nano Today, 2014. 9(5): p. 604-630

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    Materials Chemistry Frontiers, 2023

    Wang, S., et al., Progress of transition metal sulfides used as lithium -ion battery anodes. Materials Chemistry Frontiers, 2023. 7(14): p. 2779-2808

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Chandrasekar, M.S. and S. Mitra, Thin copper phosphide films as conversion anode for lithium- ion battery applications. Electrochimica Acta, 2013. 92: p. 47-54

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2020

    Li, Z., et al., Recent advances in nanostructured metal phosphides as promising anode materials for rechargeable batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2020. 8(37): p. 19113- 19132

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Nanoscale, 2014

    Oumellal, Y ., et al., Bottom-up preparation of MgH2 nanoparticles with enhanced cycle life stability during electrochemical conversion in Li -ion batteri es. Nanoscale, 2014. 6(23): p. 14459-14466

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012

    Brutti, S., et al., Magnesium hydride as a high capacity negative electrode for lithium ion batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012. 22(29): p. 14531-14537. 12

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017

    Peng, X., et al., Electrochemical performances of MgH2 and MgH2 -C films for lithium ion battery anode. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017. 711: p. 473-479

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Xu, Y . and F.M. Mulder, TiF3 catalyzed MgH2 as a Li/Na ion battery anode. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018. 43(43): p. 20033-20040

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    ACS Nano, 2018

    Zhang, B., et al., Magnesium Hydride Nanoparticles Self -Assembled on Graphene as Anode Material for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Nano, 2018. 12(4): p. 3816-3824

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2024

    Pukazhselvan, D., et al., Understanding the catalysis of chromium trioxide added magnesium hydride for hydrogen storage and Li ion battery applications. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 2024. 12(3): p. 1117-1130

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Journal of Power Sources, 2011

    Schmidt, J.P., et al., Studies on LiFePO4 as cathode material using impedance spectroscopy. Journal of Power Sources, 2011. 196(12): p. 5342-5348

    work page 2011

  37. [37]

    Boukamp, B.A. and A. Rolle, Analysis and Application of Distribution of Relaxation Times in Solid State Ionics. Solid State Ionics, 2017. 302: p. 12-18

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Electrochimica Acta, 2021

    Loureiro, F.J.A., et al., Electrochemical behaviour of magnesium hydride-added titania anode for Li-ion battery. Electrochimica Acta, 2021. 394: p. 139142

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Electrochimica Acta, 2021

    Melo, B.M.G., et al., DFRTtoEIS: An easy approach to verify the consistency of a DFRT generated from an impedance spectrum. Electrochimica Acta, 2021. 366: p. 137429

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Applied Sciences, 2021

    Loureiro, F.J.A., et al., Analysis of La4Ni3O10±δ-BaCe0.9Y0.1O3-δ Composite Cathodes for Proton Ceramic Fuel Cells. Applied Sciences, 2021. 11(8): p. 3407

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Electrochimica Acta, 2015

    Wan, T.H., et al., Influence of the Discretization Methods on the Distribution of Relaxation Times Deconvolution: Implementing Radial Basis Functions with DRTtools. Electrochimica Acta, 2015. 184: p. 483-499

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Journal of Materials Science, 2022

    Pukazhselvan, D., et al., Anatase titania as magnesium host in Mg ion rechargeable battery with magnesium pe rchlorate/ethylmagnesium bromide electrolytes. Journal of Materials Science, 2022. 57(18): p. 8442-8454

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024

    Pukazhselvan, D., et al., Catalytically driven hydrogen storage in magnesium hydride through its chemical interaction with the additive vanadium pe ntoxide. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024. 59: p. 755-763

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023

    Pukazhselvan, D., et al., A highly active additive for magnesium hydride from the MgO –TiO2 mixed oxide family: Magnesium dititanate. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023 . 48(96): p. 37510-37521

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Journal of Power Sources, 2017

    Pukazhselvan, D., et al., Evolution of reduced Ti containing phase(s) in MgH2/TiO2 system and its effect on the hydrogen storage behavior of MgH2. Journal of Power Sources, 2017. 362: p. 174-183

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Applied Surface Science, 2017

    Pukazhselvan, D., et al., Role of chemical interaction between MgH2 and TiO2 additive on the hydrogen storage behavior of MgH2. Applied Surface Science, 2017. 420: p. 740-745

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016

    Pukazhselvan, D., et al., Crystal structure, phase stoichiometry and chemical environment of MgxNbyOx+y nanoparticles and their impact on hydrogen storage in MgH2. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016. 41(27): p. 11709-11715

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016

    Pukazhselvan, D., et al., Formation of Mg –Nb–O rock salt structures in a series of mechanochemically activated MgH2 + nNb2O5 (n = 0.083–1.50) mixtures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016. 41(4): p. 2677-2688

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    ChemPhysChem, 2016

    Pukazhselvan, D., et al., Formation of MgxNbyOx+y through the Mechanochemical Reaction of MgH2 and Nb2O5, and Its Effect on the Hydrogen -Storage Behavior of MgH2. ChemPhysChem, 2016. 17(1): p. 178-183

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Nilius, and S

    Benedetti, S., N. Nilius, and S. Valeri, Chromium-Doped MgO Thin Films: Morphology, Electronic Structure, and Segregation Effects. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015. 119(45): p. 25469-25475

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena,

    Silversmit, G., et al., Determination of the V2p XPS binding energies for different vanadium oxidation states (V5+ to V0+). Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena,

    work page

  52. [52]

    Bayindir, and G.J

    Burke, P.J., Z. Bayindir, and G.J. Kipouros, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Investigation of the Surface Film on Magnesium Powders. Applied Spectroscopy, 2012. 66(5): p. 510-518. 13

    work page 2012

  53. [53]

    Laruelle, and M.W

    Kulkarni, G.U., S. Laruelle, and M.W. Roberts, The oxygen state active in the catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide at a caesium surface: isolation of the reactive anionic CO2 δ– species. Chemical Communications, 1996(1): p. 9-10

    work page 1996

  54. [54]

    A”) MgH2+5%MgxVyOx+y (battery “B

    Cao, C., et al., Solid Electrolyte Interphase on Native Oxide-Terminated Silicon Anodes for Li- Ion Batteries. Joule, 2019. 3(3): p. 762-781. Tables: Table 1 – EIS data (resistance ( R), time constant ( 0), and capacitance ( C)) for the freshly -made batteries. Parameters Fresh batteries No MgH2 (only C substrate) MgH2+5%V2O5 (battery “A”) MgH2+5%MgxVyOx...

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    A”), (b) 5 wt.% Mg xVyOx+y added MgH2 as anode active material (battery “B

    composite (V2O5 correspond to x=0). 16 Fig.2 XPS (a) survey spectra corresponding to xMgH2+V2O5 (x=0.125, 2 and 4). The V2p and O1s high resolution binding energy profiles obtained for the samples, (b) 0.125MgH 2+V2O5, (c) 2MgH 2+V2O5 and (d) 4MgH2+V2O5. 17 Fig.3 Cyclic voltammetry profiles corresponding to the battery employing (a) 5 wt.% V2O5 added MgH2...

    work page