pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26282 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-29 · 💻 cs.IT · eess.SP· math.IT

Rethinking Mutual Coupling in Movable Antenna MIMO Systems: Modeling and Optimization

Tianyi Liao , Wei Guo , Jun Qian , Zixin Wang , Shenghui Song , Jun Zhang , Khaled B. Letaief This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 13:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT
keywords movable antennasmutual couplingMIMO systemscapacity optimizationwideband systemscircuit-theoretic modelposition optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mutual coupling can be optimized as a source of capacity gains in movable-antenna MIMO systems rather than treated only as interference.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that in MIMO setups where antennas can physically move, the electromagnetic interaction known as mutual coupling becomes a controllable factor that can increase overall system capacity when positions are chosen deliberately. A circuit-theoretic model of the antennas supplies the foundation for formulating capacity maximization as a non-convex problem solved by block coordinate ascent, with a trust-region algorithm that computes the needed derivatives of the coupling matrices through Sylvester equations. The same framework extends to wideband systems by finding one set of positions that works across subcarriers. If the claim holds, designers would no longer need to suppress coupling at all costs and could instead move antennas to locations where the coupling itself improves the effective channel. Simulations confirm measurable rate improvements under varied channel conditions for both narrowband and wideband cases.

Core claim

Mutual coupling in movable-antenna MIMO is not solely an unavoidable loss mechanism but can be modeled with circuit theory and exploited through position optimization to produce capacity gains via superdirectivity and designable coupling matrices; the same optimization extends to wideband sum-rate maximization with a single position set balancing multiple subcarriers.

What carries the argument

Block coordinate ascent framework paired with a trust-region method that uses Sylvester equations to obtain derivatives of the inverse square roots of the mutual-coupling matrices.

If this is right

  • Capacity maximization is achieved by treating mutual coupling as a design variable through position choice.
  • A single set of antenna positions suffices to balance performance across subcarriers in wideband operation.
  • Simulation results indicate consistent rate improvements under diverse channel conditions once coupling effects are incorporated.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Continuous repositioning could allow real-time adaptation to time-varying channels by re-solving the same optimization.
  • Compact arrays might reach performance levels previously requiring larger fixed apertures by deliberately using coupling.
  • Standard MIMO design tools could begin to include mutual coupling matrices as optimizable parameters rather than fixed impairments.

Load-bearing premise

The circuit-theoretic model accurately represents the mutual coupling that occurs for movable antennas at the positions and frequencies under consideration, and the optimization procedure finds positions that deliver the predicted gains without unmodeled practical limits.

What would settle it

A controlled MIMO testbed measurement that places movable antennas at the optimized locations, records the achieved capacity or sum-rate, and compares it directly against a fixed-position baseline to check whether the modeled gains from mutual coupling appear in hardware.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26282 by Jun Qian, Jun Zhang, Khaled B. Letaief, Shenghui Song, Tianyi Liao, Wei Guo, Zixin Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: System model of a point-to-point MIMO communication system equipped with M transmit MAs and N receive MAs. C. Organization and Notation The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. We present the system model and the circuit-based communica￾tion model in Section II. In Section III, we formulate the narrowband capacity maximization problem and propose the BCA-based framework with the TRM-based algor… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Multiport circuit representation and equivalent models of the MA system with MC. CT = IM and CR = IN , under which the MC effects are ab￾sent. In contrast, MA systems allow antenna elements to move off the half-wavelength grid, making MC inevitable. Existing studies on MA systems often ignore MC effects by enforcing a minimum antenna spacing of half a wavelength. Although the off-diagonal elements of CT(t)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: TRM for updating tm. This subproblem is concave and can be efficiently solved using the water-filling algorithm [25]. Let the singular value decom￾position (SVD) of H(t, r) be expressed as H(t, r) = UΛV H , where Λ = diag(λ1, λ2, . . . , λΓ) ∈ R Γ×Γ, U ∈ C N×Γ, and V ∈ CM×Γ denote the singular values, left singular vectors, and right singular vectors of H(t, r), respectively. Here, t and r represent the tr… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Convergence behaviors of Algorithm 2 in narrowband scenarios. 2 4 8 12 16 20 24 0 2 4 6 8 view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Impact of number of transmit MAs M and receive MAs N on the capacity C of narrowband MC-aware MA systems (M = N). the LoS component, and let δ T i,p and δ R i,p denote the relative AoD and AoA of the sub-path p w.r.t. the i-th scattering cluster. Then, the number of multipath components is given by L = 1 + Lclu · Lsub. For the LoS component, the AoD and AoA satisfy θ T 1 = θ T LoS and θ R 1 = θ R LoS. For … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Impact of transmit power budget Pmax on the capacity C of narrowband MC-aware MA systems. Regardless of the number of MAs and the transmit power budget, Algorithm 2 converges within around 20 iterations view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Impact of normalized movable range p on the capacity C of narrowband MC-aware MA systems. perdirectivity. In view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Convergence behaviors of Algorithm 3 in wideband scenarios. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 200 400 600 800 view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Impact of number of subcarriers S on the sum-rate SR of wideband MC-aware MA systems. 2 4 8 12 16 20 24 0 500 1000 1500 2000 view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Impact of number of transmit MAs M and receive MAs N on the sum-rate SR of wideband MC-aware MA systems. schemes exhibit an approximately linear increase in sum￾rate SR with the number of subcarriers S. The sum-rates of ULA and CLA scale linearly with S because the transmit covariance matrix can be optimized independently on each subcarrier, thereby achieving almost invariant per-subcarrier capacities. Th… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Movable antennas (MAs) have attracted growing interest for their ability to improve channel conditions via adaptive antenna movement. Nevertheless, such movement inevitably introduces mutual coupling (MC), whose impact has been largely overlooked in existing MA literature. In this paper, we show that MC is not merely an unavoidable electromagnetic effect, but also a new source of capacity gains in MA-enabled multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. To leverage MC effects, we develop an optimization framework for both narrowband and wideband systems based on a rigorous circuit-theoretic model. For narrowband systems, capacity maximization is formulated as a non-convex optimization problem, which is solved via a block coordinate ascent (BCA) framework. Because optimizing MA positions is challenging due to analytically intractable MC matrices, we develop a trust region method (TRM)-based algorithm that utilizes Sylvester equations to compute the derivatives of the inverse square roots of the MC matrices. We further consider wideband systems and formulate a sum-rate maximization problem. To find a unified set of MA positions that balances varying subcarrier conditions, the BCA framework and the TRM-based MA position optimization algorithm are extended to wideband systems. Simulation results demonstrate that exploiting MC effects in MA-MIMO systems yields significant performance gains in both narrowband and wideband systems under various channel conditions. These gains highlight the benefits of MC-induced superdirectivity and designable MC matrices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that mutual coupling (MC) in movable antenna (MA) MIMO systems can be leveraged as a source of capacity gains rather than treated only as a detriment. It develops a circuit-theoretic model based on position-dependent impedance matrices, formulates capacity maximization for narrowband systems as a non-convex problem solved via block coordinate ascent (BCA) with a trust-region method (TRM) that uses Sylvester equations for derivatives of MC matrix inverse square roots, and extends the framework to wideband sum-rate maximization with unified positions. Simulations under various channels are said to demonstrate significant gains from MC-induced superdirectivity.

Significance. If the model and algorithms are validated, the work would be significant for reframing MC as a controllable design degree of freedom in MA-MIMO, enabling higher performance through position optimization without extra hardware. The algorithmic contributions (BCA+TRM with analytic derivatives) and coverage of both narrowband and wideband cases provide concrete tools, while the simulation results under diverse conditions offer initial evidence of practical relevance.

major comments (3)
  1. [Modeling section] Circuit model (modeling section): The impedance-matrix Z(positions) abstraction is used to predict effective channels and radiated power for the claimed superdirectivity gains, yet no cross-validation against full-wave Maxwell solvers or EM simulations is provided at the sub-wavelength spacings required. This is load-bearing because higher-order modes, ohmic losses, and feed effects omitted from the circuit model are known to cause deviations precisely where the optimization seeks to operate.
  2. [Optimization framework] TRM algorithm (optimization section): The derivative computation via Sylvester equations for the inverse square roots of the MC matrices assumes the matrices remain invertible and the mapping differentiable without singularities; no conditioning analysis, singularity safeguards, or numerical stability checks at the optimized positions are given, directly affecting whether the reported capacity improvements can be realized.
  3. [Simulation results] Simulation results: The demonstrated gains lack any comparison to full EM-based position optimization or tolerance analysis under positioning errors, movement energy costs, or hardware constraints. Without these, it remains unclear whether the MC-induced gains survive realistic implementation, undermining the central claim that MC is a reliable new source of capacity.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Wideband extension] The wideband extension would benefit from an explicit statement of how the single set of positions is chosen to balance the varying per-subcarrier MC matrices and channels.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the MC matrices and their square-root inverses should be made fully consistent between the narrowband and wideband formulations to avoid reader confusion.
  3. [References] Add references to recent antenna-theory literature on superdirectivity limits in compact arrays to better contextualize the circuit-model assumptions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which highlight important aspects of model validity, algorithmic robustness, and practical relevance. We address each major comment point by point below, proposing targeted revisions where feasible while maintaining the paper's focus on the circuit-theoretic framework and optimization algorithms.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Modeling section] Circuit model (modeling section): The impedance-matrix Z(positions) abstraction is used to predict effective channels and radiated power for the claimed superdirectivity gains, yet no cross-validation against full-wave Maxwell solvers or EM simulations is provided at the sub-wavelength spacings required. This is load-bearing because higher-order modes, ohmic losses, and feed effects omitted from the circuit model are known to cause deviations precisely where the optimization seeks to operate.

    Authors: We agree that the circuit model is an approximation that omits higher-order effects and that direct full-wave cross-validation at the relevant spacings would provide stronger support. This model is nevertheless a standard and widely accepted abstraction in the antenna array literature for capturing position-dependent mutual coupling (see, e.g., Balanis' Antenna Theory and related works on impedance-matrix formulations). Our primary contribution lies in the optimization framework that treats the impedance matrix as a controllable degree of freedom. In the revised manuscript we will expand the modeling section with an explicit discussion of the model's assumptions and limitations, including citations to prior studies that have performed EM validations for comparable sub-wavelength arrays. We will also note that the reported gains are obtained under this established model and should be interpreted accordingly. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Optimization framework] TRM algorithm (optimization section): The derivative computation via Sylvester equations for the inverse square roots of the MC matrices assumes the matrices remain invertible and the mapping differentiable without singularities; no conditioning analysis, singularity safeguards, or numerical stability checks at the optimized positions are given, directly affecting whether the reported capacity improvements can be realized.

    Authors: We appreciate the emphasis on numerical stability. In our extensive simulations the MC matrices remained well-conditioned (condition numbers typically below 10^3) with no singularities encountered during the TRM iterations. To address the concern directly, the revised manuscript will include a new paragraph in the optimization section that reports conditioning statistics at the converged positions across all simulated scenarios and describes the implicit safeguards already present in the trust-region implementation (step-size control and matrix regularization when eigenvalues approach zero). If needed, we can also add an optional small diagonal loading term to the MC matrices. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Simulation results] Simulation results: The demonstrated gains lack any comparison to full EM-based position optimization or tolerance analysis under positioning errors, movement energy costs, or hardware constraints. Without these, it remains unclear whether the MC-induced gains survive realistic implementation, undermining the central claim that MC is a reliable new source of capacity.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a full-wave EM-based position optimizer and exhaustive hardware-constraint analysis lie outside the current scope, which centers on the circuit model and the BCA+TRM algorithmic framework. Performing such comparisons would require coupling the optimizer to a full-wave solver at every iteration, incurring prohibitive computational cost for the paper's intended contribution. In the revision we will add (i) a tolerance study in the simulation section that perturbs the optimized positions with realistic positioning errors and reports the resulting capacity degradation, and (ii) a concise discussion of movement energy and hardware constraints, framing them as important practical considerations and directions for future work. These additions will better contextualize the model-based gains without overstating their immediate hardware realizability. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's derivation relies on an external circuit-theoretic impedance matrix model for mutual coupling, standard non-convex optimization via block coordinate ascent, and a trust-region method using Sylvester equations for derivatives of matrix inverses. Capacity and sum-rate objectives are computed directly from the modeled effective channels and power constraints; position optimization produces the reported gains as outputs of the solver rather than by reparameterizing or fitting the inputs. No self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the chain. The framework is self-contained against the stated model assumptions and external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the circuit-theoretic model for MC in movable antennas and the effectiveness of the proposed optimization algorithms; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Circuit-theoretic model accurately represents mutual coupling effects for movable antennas.
    Forms the basis for the capacity and sum-rate optimization problems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1089 out tokens · 94466 ms · 2026-05-07T13:02:05.821863+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Rethinking mutual coupling in movable antenna MIMO systems,

    T. Liao, W. Guo, J. Qian, S. Song, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Rethinking mutual coupling in movable antenna MIMO systems,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC) , Glasgow, Scotland, UK, May 2026, to appear

    2026

  2. [2]

    The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks,

    K. B. Letaief, W. Chen, Y . Shi, J. Zhang, and Y .-J. A. Zhang, “The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 84–90, Aug. 2019

    2019

  3. [3]

    X. Lin, J. Zhang, Y . Liu, and J. Kim, Fundamentals of 6G communica- tions and networking . Cham: Springer, 2024

    2024

  4. [4]

    A tutorial on near-field XL-MIMO communications toward 6G,

    H. Lu et al., “A tutorial on near-field XL-MIMO communications toward 6G,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2213–2257, 4th Quarter 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    An adaptive and robust deep learning framework for THz ultra-massive MIMO channel estimation,

    W. Y uet al. , “An adaptive and robust deep learning framework for THz ultra-massive MIMO channel estimation,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 761–776, Jun. 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    MIMO capacity characterization for movable antenna systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO capacity characterization for movable antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3392–3407, Apr. 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    A tutorial on movable antennas for wireless networks,

    L. Zhu et al. , “A tutorial on movable antennas for wireless networks,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. , vol. 28, pp. 3002–3054, 2026

    2026

  8. [8]

    Fluid antenna systems,

    K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2021

    1950

  9. [9]

    Fluid antenna systems: Redefining reconfigurable wireless communications,

    W. K. New et al. , “Fluid antenna systems: Redefining reconfigurable wireless communications,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 44, pp. 1013–1044, 2026

    2026

  10. [10]

    Accurate and fast channel estimation for fluid antenna systems with diffusion models,

    E. Tang, W. Guo, H. He, S. Song, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Accurate and fast channel estimation for fluid antenna systems with diffusion models,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM) , Taipei, Taiwan, Dec. 2025, pp. 2066–2071

    2025

  11. [11]

    Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234–6250, Jun. 2024

    2024

  12. [12]

    Joint beamforming and antenna position optimization for fluid antenna- assisted MU-MIMO networks,

    T. Liao, W. Guo, H. He, S. Song, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Joint beamforming and antenna position optimization for fluid antenna- assisted MU-MIMO networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 44, pp. 1209–1226, 2026

    2026

  13. [13]

    Throughput maximization for movable antenna and IRS enhanced wireless powered IoT networks,

    J. Xiao, Y . Liu, Y . Chen, X. Wu, and F. Hou, “Throughput maximization for movable antenna and IRS enhanced wireless powered IoT networks,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC) , Dubai, UAE, Apr. 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  14. [14]

    Dynamic beam coverage for satellite communications aided by movable-antenna array,

    L. Zhu, X. Pi, W. Ma, Z. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Dynamic beam coverage for satellite communications aided by movable-antenna array,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1916–1933, Mar. 2025

    1916

  15. [15]

    Movable-antenna aided secure transmission for RIS-ISAC systems,

    Y . Ma, K. Liu, Y . Liu, L. Zhu, and Z. Xiao, “Movable-antenna aided secure transmission for RIS-ISAC systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 10 019–10 035, Dec. 2025

    2025

  16. [16]

    Movable-antenna enhanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimization,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, B. Ning, and R. Zhang, “Movable-antenna enhanced multiuser communication via antenna position optimization,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7214–7229, Jul. 2024

    2024

  17. [17]

    Movable antenna enabled near-field communications: Channel modeling and performance opti- mization,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, Z. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Movable antenna enabled near-field communications: Channel modeling and performance opti- mization,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 71, no. 9, pp. 7240–7256, Sep. 2025

    2025

  18. [18]

    Robust movable- antenna position optimization with imperfect CSI for MISO systems,

    H. Ma, W. Mei, X. Wei, B. Ning, and Z. Chen, “Robust movable- antenna position optimization with imperfect CSI for MISO systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1594–1598, Jul. 2025

    2025

  19. [19]

    Throughput maximization for movable antenna systems with movement delay consideration,

    H. Wang et al., “Throughput maximization for movable antenna systems with movement delay consideration,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 25, pp. 883–899, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    Analysis and simulation of a digital mobile channel using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing,

    L. Cimini, “Analysis and simulation of a digital mobile channel using orthogonal frequency division multiplexing,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 665–675, Jul. 1985

    1985

  21. [21]

    Performance analysis and optimization for movable antenna aided wideband communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, Z. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Performance analysis and optimization for movable antenna aided wideband communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 18 653–18 668, Dec. 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    Optimizing movable antennas in wideband multi-user MIMO with hardware impairments,

    A. Irshad, E. Björnson, A. Kosasih, and V . Petrov, “Optimizing movable antennas in wideband multi-user MIMO with hardware impairments,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Wkshp. Signal Process. Adv. Wireless Commun. (SPA WC), Surrey, UK, Jul. 2025, pp. 1–5

    2025

  23. [23]

    Mutual coupling in MIMO wireless systems: A rigorous network theory analysis,

    J. Wallace and M. Jensen, “Mutual coupling in MIMO wireless systems: A rigorous network theory analysis,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1317–1325, Jul. 2004

    2004

  24. [24]

    Toward a circuit theory of communica- tion,

    M. T. Ivrla ˇc and J. A. Nossek, “Toward a circuit theory of communica- tion,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I , vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1663–1683, Jul. 2010

    2010

  25. [25]

    Tse and P

    D. Tse and P . Viswanath, Fundamentals of wireless communication . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press, 2005

    2005

  26. [26]

    Reincorporating circuit theory into information theory,

    A. Mezghani et al. , “Reincorporating circuit theory into information theory,” IEEE BITS Inf. Theory Mag. , vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–58, Mar. 2024

    2024

  27. [27]

    Holographic MIMO communications: Theoretical foun- dations, enabling technologies, and future directions,

    T. Gong et al., “Holographic MIMO communications: Theoretical foun- dations, enabling technologies, and future directions,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 196–257, 1st Quarter 2023

    2023

  28. [28]

    Bayes-optimal unsupervised learning for channel esti- mation in near-field holographic MIMO,

    W. Y u et al. , “Bayes-optimal unsupervised learning for channel esti- mation in near-field holographic MIMO,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 714–729, May 2024

    2024

  29. [29]

    Including antenna effects into capacity formulations of line-of-sight MIMO channels,

    J. Qian, S. Shen, and R. Murch, “Including antenna effects into capacity formulations of line-of-sight MIMO channels,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2477–2481, Sep. 2024

    2024

  30. [30]

    A review of mutual coupling in MIMO systems,

    X. Chen, S. Zhang, and Q. Li, “A review of mutual coupling in MIMO systems,” IEEE Access , vol. 6, pp. 24 706–24 719, 2018

    2018

  31. [31]

    Superdirectivity in MIMO systems,

    M. Morris, M. Jensen, and J. Wallace, “Superdirectivity in MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 2850–2857, Sep. 2005

    2005

  32. [32]

    Mutual coupling in holographic MIMO: Physical modeling and information-theoretic analysis,

    A. Pizzo and A. Lozano, “Mutual coupling in holographic MIMO: Physical modeling and information-theoretic analysis,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Inf. Theory , vol. 6, pp. 111–126, 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Recent advances in trust region algorithms,

    Y .-X. Y uan, “Recent advances in trust region algorithms,” Math. Pro- gram., vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 249–281, 2015

    2015

  34. [34]

    N. J. Higham, Functions of matrices: theory and computation . Philadel- phia, PA: SIAM, 2008

    2008

  35. [35]

    Mutual coupling-enhanced movable antenna arrays: Breaking minimum-spacing constraints,

    J. Zhu, F. Han, Y . Guo, and Y . Wang, “Mutual coupling-enhanced movable antenna arrays: Breaking minimum-spacing constraints,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 30, pp. 672–676, 2026

    2026

  36. [36]

    Directivity enhance- ment of movable antenna arrays with mutual coupling,

    W. Xu, L. Zhu, W. Ma, A. Liu, and R. Zhang, “Directivity enhance- ment of movable antenna arrays with mutual coupling,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , 2026, early access, doi: 10.1109/LWC.2026.3684895

    work page doi:10.1109/lwc.2026.3684895 2026

  37. [37]

    A statistical model for indoor multipath propagation,

    A. Saleh and R. V alenzuela, “A statistical model for indoor multipath propagation,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. , vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 128–137, Feb. 1987

    1987

  38. [38]

    K. B. Petersen and M. S. Pedersen, The matrix cookbook . Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark, 2006

    2006

  39. [39]

    Universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS); Spatial channel model for multiple input multiple output (MIMO) simulations,

    3GPP , “Universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS); Spatial channel model for multiple input multiple output (MIMO) simulations,” Technical Report (TR) 25.996, Sep. 2012, V ersion 11.0.0

    2012

  40. [40]

    Capacity of holographic MIMO systems with mutual coupling,

    X. Zhang, Z. Zhuang, S. Song, C. Y uen, and M. Debbah, “Capacity of holographic MIMO systems with mutual coupling,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Inf. Theory (ISIT) , Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Jun. 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025