Low-Energy Purification of Crystal Defects by Rydberg Excitons

Shiva Kant Tiwari; Tijs Karman; Valentin Walther

arxiv: 2604.27331 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Low-Energy Purification of Crystal Defects by Rydberg Excitons

Shiva Kant Tiwari , Tijs Karman , Valentin Walther This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 08:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords rydberg excitonscrystal purificationimpurity scatteringultralow energycuprous oxidetwo-photon excitationmultichannel scattering

0 comments

The pith

Rydberg excitons purify crystal defects more efficiently at ultralow energies via two-photon excitation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents a multichannel theory for how Rydberg excitons scatter off impurities in cuprous oxide. It shows that at high energies, elastic and inelastic scattering reduce the effectiveness of purifying the crystal by neutralizing charged defects. At ultralow energies, only s-wave scattering occurs, which enhances the capture of impurities while suppressing unwanted scattering channels. The authors propose that degenerate two-photon excitation can reach this favorable regime with tunable recoil momentum. A sympathetic reader would care because better purification could reduce stray electric fields that interfere with quantum effects in the material.

Core claim

We identify a quantum regime at ultralow collision energies favorable for purification, where only the s-wave contributes: capture is enhanced while elastic and inelastic channels are strongly suppressed. This regime can be accessed via degenerate two-photon excitation of even-parity Rydberg excitons with tunable recoil. At high energies, purification is reduced relative to Langevin capture due to inelastic redistribution and dominant elastic scattering including glory scattering.

What carries the argument

Multichannel theory of Rydberg exciton-impurity scattering resolving capture, elastic scattering, and inelastic transitions.

If this is right

Capture of impurities is enhanced in the ultralow-energy s-wave regime compared to higher energies.
Elastic glory scattering and inelastic transitions between excitonic states are suppressed at low energies.
Two-photon excitation allows access to the favorable regime and enables tuning of collision energies.
Systematic exploration of exciton-impurity scattering becomes possible over a wide energy range.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Applying two-photon excitation in experiments could demonstrate improved purification in cuprous oxide crystals.
Insights from this scattering theory may extend to other materials with Rydberg excitons for defect control.
The ability to tune recoil could help measure energy-dependent cross sections for different scattering processes.

Load-bearing premise

The multichannel quantum scattering theory correctly describes the energy-dependent competition between capture and scattering processes, and two-photon excitation can achieve the ultralow collision energies needed.

What would settle it

An experiment comparing impurity neutralization rates or residual electric field strengths between single-photon and two-photon excitation of Rydberg excitons in the same cuprous oxide sample.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27331 by Shiva Kant Tiwari, Tijs Karman, Valentin Walther.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Energy-dependent scattering channels and adiabatic potentials: (a) Schematic illustration of a Rydberg exciton (gray ellipse) approaching a charged defect (blue), with the arrow indicating the direction of motion. Over the recoil-energy range accessible by the two-photon excitation scheme, the collision can lead to three competing outcomes: elastic scattering, inelastic scattering (with a change of inter… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Semiclassical partial-wave dynamics: (a) The partial-wave reactive cross-section for the multichannel case (blue ⋆) decreases smoothly due to the onset of inelastic scattering (red ◦), whereas for the single-channel polarization potential (green ⋄) it drops sharply beyond l ≈ 60 . (b) The elastic cross-section for the polarization potential (black □, solid line) shows deviations from the multichannel resu… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Cross-section scaling and angular distributions: (a) The reactive contribution (blue ⋆) exhibits a reduced scaling, σre ∝ n 3.1 , relative to the Langevin prediction (solid green line), owing to inelastic scattering (blue ◦). The n = 5 inelastic point lies below the plot scale, with σin = 7.2 × 10−5 µm2 . (b) The elastic differential cross section (solid black) exhibits strong forward and backward peaks … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Quantum-enhanced purification: (a) Phase shifts (solid black line) obtained from the multichannel calculation decrease as the collision energy is reduced. The scattering length (solid red line) converges to the analytical zero-energy value (≈ 66µm) for the polarization potential (dashed red line). (b) The elastic cross section (solid black line) saturates to a constant value as E → 0. The reactive cross s… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Recent experiments show that optically generated Rydberg excitons in cuprous oxide can neutralize charged impurities, strongly reducing stray electric fields and effectively purifying the crystal. Here, we develop a multichannel theory of Rydberg exciton-impurity scattering that resolves the competing roles of capture, elastic scattering, and inelastic transitions between excitonic states. We find that at high collision energies, as effective under conventional single-photon excitation, purification is reduced relative to Langevin capture. These collisions are accompanied by inelastic redistribution and dominant elastic scattering, including pronounced glory scattering, which suppress purification efficiency. We identify a quantum regime at ultralow collision energies favorable for purification, where only the s-wave contributes: capture is enhanced while elastic and inelastic channels are strongly suppressed. This regime can be accessed via degenerate two-photon excitation of even-parity Rydberg excitons with tunable recoil, additionally enabling the systematic exploration of exciton-impurity scattering over a wide range of collision energies beyond what is readily achievable in atomic counterparts in atomic gas experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper's multichannel scattering theory identifies an ultralow-energy s-wave regime where Rydberg exciton capture is enhanced and other channels suppressed, with a two-photon scheme to reach it experimentally.

read the letter

The main thing here is that at ultralow collision energies only the s-wave survives in Rydberg exciton-impurity scattering, which boosts capture while cutting elastic and inelastic losses that hurt purification at the higher energies from single-photon excitation. They back this with a multichannel treatment that tracks capture against redistribution and glory scattering, then show how degenerate two-photon excitation of even-parity states plus recoil tuning can land in that regime and let you scan energies more broadly than atomic-gas work allows. That combination of the low-energy identification and the practical access method is the concrete advance over the earlier cuprous oxide experiments. The derivation follows standard partial-wave threshold laws applied to the exciton-impurity potential, and the stress-test note is right that nothing internally inconsistent jumps out. What they do well is keep the competing channels explicit instead of folding everything into an effective Langevin rate. Soft spots are limited but real: the size of the purification gain still hinges on how accurately the multichannel couplings and the long-range potential are modeled, and I'd want to see the plotted cross sections to judge whether the suppression is strong enough to matter once phonons or other crystal effects enter. The two-photon tuning looks feasible on paper but could run into linewidth or inhomogeneous broadening issues in a real sample. This is aimed at people working on Rydberg excitons in solids or defect control in quantum materials. A reader who needs a controllable way to reduce stray fields would get direct value from the proposed regime and excitation method. The central argument holds up on its own terms with no load-bearing gaps, so it deserves a serious referee rather than a desk reject.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a multichannel quantum scattering theory for Rydberg exciton-impurity interactions in cuprous oxide. It shows that high-energy collisions (as in conventional single-photon excitation) suffer reduced purification efficiency due to dominant elastic scattering (including glory scattering) and inelastic transitions between excitonic states. At ultralow collision energies, only the s-wave partial wave survives, enhancing capture cross sections while strongly suppressing elastic and inelastic channels. This regime is predicted to be accessible and tunable via degenerate two-photon excitation of even-parity Rydberg excitons, enabling systematic exploration of scattering over a wide energy range.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work provides a physically consistent theoretical framework for optimizing Rydberg-exciton-based crystal purification, directly addressing recent experimental observations of impurity neutralization. The identification of an ultralow-energy s-wave regime favorable for capture, together with a concrete experimental access route via recoil-tuned two-photon excitation, constitutes a significant advance. Strengths include the derivation from standard partial-wave threshold laws applied to a Rydberg-impurity potential, the resolution of competing capture/elastic/inelastic channels without apparent circularity or unjustified approximations, and the proposal of a tunable platform that extends beyond typical atomic-gas limits.

minor comments (2)

The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief explicit statement of the model potential (e.g., the form of the Rydberg-impurity interaction and any cutoff or core corrections) to allow immediate assessment of the multichannel calculation.
Figure captions and axis labels should specify the units and scaling of the reported cross sections (e.g., whether they are in units of the Langevin capture cross section) for clarity when comparing energy regimes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their supportive review, accurate summary of our multichannel scattering theory, and recommendation for minor revision. We are pleased that the work is recognized as providing a consistent framework for Rydberg-exciton purification, with the ultralow-energy s-wave regime and two-photon access route highlighted as significant advances. No specific major comments were listed in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper constructs a multichannel scattering theory for Rydberg exciton-impurity interactions from standard quantum-mechanical partial-wave analysis and long-range potential scattering. The central claim—that an ultralow-energy regime exists where only s-wave scattering survives, enhancing capture while suppressing elastic and inelastic channels—follows directly from Wigner threshold laws applied to the Rydberg-impurity potential, a general result independent of the paper's inputs or fits. The proposed access via degenerate two-photon excitation with tunable recoil is a standard optical technique for controlling collision energy, not derived from or equivalent to the scattering results. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain; the theory resolves competing channels in a manner consistent with external scattering benchmarks without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim relies on the validity of the multichannel theory and the physical accessibility of the ultralow energy regime. No free parameters or new entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract; the theory builds on standard quantum mechanics.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Multichannel quantum scattering theory can be applied to Rydberg exciton-impurity interactions.
The paper develops such a theory to resolve capture, elastic, and inelastic processes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5473 in / 1421 out tokens · 150788 ms · 2026-05-07T08:10:31.253694+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

[1]

quantum purifica- 5 tion

(see Sec. S3 [32]). We distinguish between the re- active (σ(a) re ), inelastic (σ(a) in ), and elastic (σ(a) el ) cross sections from the incoming channela, respectively. To- gether, the three state-resolved cross sections give a complete physical picture of the Rydberg exciton scat- tering with the impurity. The scattering processes are computed using a...

work page
[2]

Basset, A

J. Basset, A. Stockklauser, D.-D. Jarausch, T. Frey, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, A. Wallraff, K. Ensslin, and T. Ihn, Applied Physics Letters105 (2014)

work page 2014
[3]

N. T. Nguyen and S. Das Sarma, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics83, 235322 (2011)

work page 2011
[4]

J. P. Kestner, X. Wang, L. S. Bishop, E. Barnes, and S. Das Sarma, Physical review letters110, 140502 (2013)

work page 2013
[5]

Barnes, J

E. Barnes, J. Kestner, N. Nguyen, and S. Das Sarma, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 84, 235309 (2011)

work page 2011
[6]

A. V. Kuhlmann, J. Houel, A. Ludwig, L. Greuter, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, M. Poggio, and R. J. Warburton, Nature Physics 9, 570 (2013)

work page 2013
[7]

Hu and S

X. Hu and S. Das Sarma, Physical review letters96, 100501 (2006)

work page 2006
[8]

Culcer, X

D. Culcer, X. Hu, and S. Das Sarma, Applied Physics Letters95 (2009)

work page 2009
[9]

Houel, A

J. Houel, A. Kuhlmann, L. Greuter, F. Xue, M. Poggio, B. Gerardot, P. Dalgarno, A. Badolato, P. Petroff, A. Ludwig, et al., Physical review letters108, 107401 (2012)

work page 2012
[10]

Hauck, F

M. Hauck, F. Seilmeier, S. Beavan, A. Badolato, P. Petroff, and A. Högele, Physical Review B90, 235306 (2014)

work page 2014
[11]

Kylänpää and H.-P

I. Kylänpää and H.-P. Komsa, Phys. Rev. B92, 205418 (2015)

work page 2015
[12]

Van der Donck, M

M. Van der Donck, M. Zarenia, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B96, 035131 (2017)

work page 2017
[13]

Courtade, M

E. Courtade, M. Semina, M. Manca, M. M. Glazov, C. Robert, F. Cadiz, G. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, 17 M. Pierre, W. Escoffier, E. L. Ivchenko, P. Renucci, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Phys. Rev. B96, 085302 (2017)

work page 2017
[14]

C. Fey, P. Schmelcher, A. Imamoglu, and R. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. B101, 195417 (2020)

work page 2020
[15]

Klein, M

J. Klein, M. Florian, A. Hötger, A. Steinhoff, A. Delhomme, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, F. Jahnke, A. W. Holleitner, M. Potemski, C. Faugeras, A. V. Stier, and J. J. Finley, Phys. Rev. B105, L041302 (2022)

work page 2022
[16]

R. Y. Kezerashvili, S. M. Tsiklauri, and A. Dublin, Phys. Rev. B109, 085406 (2024)

work page 2024
[17]

Perea-Causin, S

R. Perea-Causin, S. Brem, O. Schmidt, and E. Malic, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036903 (2024)

work page 2024
[18]

Sidler, P

M. Sidler, P. Back, O. Cotlet, A. Srivastava, T. Fink, M. Kroner, E. Demler, and A. Imamoglu, Nature Physics13, 255 (2017)

work page 2017
[19]

D. K. Efimkin and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B95, 035417 (2017)

work page 2017
[20]

S. O. Krüger, H. Stolz, and S. Scheel, Physical Review B101, 235204 (2020)

work page 2020
[21]

Bergen, V

M. Bergen, V. Walther, B. Panda, M. Harati, S. Siegeroth, J. Heckötter, and M. Aßmann, Nature Communications 14, 8235 (2023)

work page 2023
[22]

Kazimierczuk, D

T. Kazimierczuk, D. Fröhlich, S. Scheel, H. Stolz, and M. Bayer, Nature514, 343 (2014)

work page 2014
[23]

M. A. Versteegh, S. Steinhauer, J. Bajo, T. Lettner, A. Soro, A. Romanova, S. Gyger, L. Schweickert, A. Mysyrowicz, and V. Zwiller, Physical Review B104, 245206 (2021)

work page 2021
[24]

Chakrabarti, K

P. Chakrabarti, K. Morin, D. Lagarde, X. Marie, and T. Boulier, Physical Review Letters134, 126902 (2025)

work page 2025
[25]

Zielińska-Raczyńska and D

S. Zielińska-Raczyńska and D. Ziemkiewicz, arXiv e-prints , arXiv (2026)

work page 2026
[26]

Brewin, L

A. Brewin, L. A. Gallagher, J. D. Pritchett, H. Q. Wong, R. M. Potvliege, S. J. Clark, and M. P. Jones, New Journal of Physics26, 113018 (2024)

work page 2024
[27]

Walther and A

V. Walther and A. S. Sørensen, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 033607 (2023)

work page 2023
[28]

Walther, L

V. Walther, L. Zhang, S. F. Yelin, and T. Pohl, Phys. Rev. B105, 075307 (2022)

work page 2022
[29]

S. A. Lynch, C. Hodges, S. Mandal, W. Langbein, R. P. Singh, L. A. Gallagher, J. D. Pritchett, D. Pizzey, J. P. Rogers, C. S. Adams,et al., Physical Review Materials5, 084602 (2021)

work page 2021
[30]

Brewin, M

A. Brewin, M. P. A. Jones, and S. J. Clark, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12466 (2026), arXiv:2602.12466

work page arXiv 2026
[31]

Hodby, T

J. Hodby, T. Jenkins, C. Schwab, H. Tamura, and D. Trivich, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics9, 1429 (1976)

work page 1976
[32]

N. Naka, I. Akimoto, M. Shirai, and K.-i. Kan’no, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics85, 035209 (2012)

work page 2012
[33]

A detailed classical treatment of Rydberg exciton–ion scattering, including the backward glory effect, is also provided

See Supplemental Material for additional details on the exciton–ion interaction potential, the multichannel Schrödinger equation, and the boundary conditions. A detailed classical treatment of Rydberg exciton–ion scattering, including the backward glory effect, is also provided

work page
[34]

Heckötter, M

J. Heckötter, M. Freitag, D. Fröhlich, M. Aßmann, M. Bayer, M. Semina, and M. Glazov, Physical Review B96, 125142 (2017)

work page 2017
[35]

Hahn, Physical Review A62, 042703 (2000)

Y. Hahn, Physical Review A62, 042703 (2000)

work page 2000
[36]

Saffman, T

M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Reviews of modern physics82, 2313 (2010)

work page 2010
[37]

Duspayev, X

A. Duspayev, X. Han, M. A. Viray, L. Ma, J. Zhao, and G. Raithel, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023114 (2021)

work page 2021
[38]

Kamenski and V

A. Kamenski and V. Ovsiannikov, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics47, 095002 (2014)

work page 2014
[39]

Côté and A

R. Côté and A. Dalgarno, Physical Review A62, 012709 (2000)

work page 2000
[40]

Karman, L

T. Karman, L. Janssen, R. Sprenkels, and G. C. Groenenboom, The Journal of Chemical Physics141 (2014)

work page 2014
[41]

I. J. Thompson and F. M. Nunes,Nuclear reactions for astrophysics: principles, calculation and applications of low- energy reactions (Cambridge University Press, 2009)

work page 2009
[42]

R. D. Levine and R. B. Bernstein, (No Title) (1987)

work page 1987
[43]

Landau, Oxford: Pergamon Press) p422, 817

L. Landau, Oxford: Pergamon Press) p422, 817

work page
[44]

Ríos and Athanasopoulou,Introduction to Cold and Ultracold Chemistry (Springer, 2020)

P. Ríos and Athanasopoulou,Introduction to Cold and Ultracold Chemistry (Springer, 2020)

work page 2020
[45]

J. A. Adam, Physics reports356, 229 (2002)

work page 2002
[46]

M. V. Berry and K. Mount, Reports on Progress in Physics35, 315 (1972)

work page 1972
[47]

Heckötter, A

J. Heckötter, A. Farenbruch, D. Fröhlich, M. Aßmann, D. Yakovlev, M. Bayer, M. Semina, M. Glazov, P. Rommel, J. Ertl, et al., Physics Reports1100, 1 (2025)

work page 2025
[48]

J. P. Rogers, L. A. P. Gallagher, D. Pizzey, J. D. Pritchett, C. S. Adams, M. P. A. Jones, C. Hodges, W. Langbein, and S. A. Lynch, Phys. Rev. B105, 115206 (2022)

work page 2022
[49]

Idziaszek, A

Z. Idziaszek, A. Simoni, T. Calarco, and P. S. Julienne, New Journal of Physics13, 083005 (2011)

work page 2011
[50]

M. Lara, P. G. Jambrina, J.-M. Launay, and F. J. Aoiz, Phys. Rev. A91, 030701 (2015)

work page 2015
[51]

G. F. Gribakin and V. V. Flambaum, Phys. Rev. A48, 546 (1993)

work page 1993
[52]

Jachymski, M

K. Jachymski, M. Krych, P. S. Julienne, and Z. Idziaszek, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 213202 (2013)

work page 2013
[53]

Vogt and G

E. Vogt and G. H. Wannier, Physical Review95, 1190 (1954)

work page 1954
[54]

I. I. Fabrikant and H. Hotop, Physical Review A63, 022706 (2001)

work page 2001
[55]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory , 3rd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013)

work page 2013
[56]

Braaten and H.-W

E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, Physics Reports428, 259 (2006)

work page 2006
[57]

T. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Li, Z. Lu, S. Miao, Z. Lian, Y. Meng, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, D. Smirnov, C. Zhang, and S.-F. Shi, Nano Letters20, 7635 (2020). 18

work page 2020
[58]

Berngruber, D

M. Berngruber, D. J. Bosworth, O. A. Herrera-Sancho, V. S. V. Anasuri, N. Zuber, F. Hummel, J. Krauter, F. Meinert, R. Löw, P. Schmelcher, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 083001 (2024)

work page 2024
[59]

Scheuler, J

N. Scheuler, J. Main, P. Rommel, F. Pfeiffer, S. Scheel, and P. A. Belov, Phys. Rev. B113, 115413 (2026)

work page 2026
[60]

Domcke, H

W. Domcke, H. Koppel, and D. R. Yarkony, Conical intersections: electronic structure, dynamics & spectroscopy , Vol. 15 (World Scientific, 2004)

work page 2004
[61]

L. M. C. Janssen,Cold collision dynamics of NH radicals (Sl: sn, 2012)

work page 2012
[62]

Brouard and C

M. Brouard and C. Vallance,Tutorials in molecular reaction dynamics (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015)

work page 2015
[63]

Friedrich,Classical Scattering Theory (Springer, 2015) pp

H. Friedrich,Classical Scattering Theory (Springer, 2015) pp. 1–21

work page 2015
[64]

R. G. Newton,Scattering theory of waves and particles (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

work page 2013

[1] [1]

quantum purifica- 5 tion

(see Sec. S3 [32]). We distinguish between the re- active (σ(a) re ), inelastic (σ(a) in ), and elastic (σ(a) el ) cross sections from the incoming channela, respectively. To- gether, the three state-resolved cross sections give a complete physical picture of the Rydberg exciton scat- tering with the impurity. The scattering processes are computed using a...

work page

[2] [2]

Basset, A

J. Basset, A. Stockklauser, D.-D. Jarausch, T. Frey, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, A. Wallraff, K. Ensslin, and T. Ihn, Applied Physics Letters105 (2014)

work page 2014

[3] [3]

N. T. Nguyen and S. Das Sarma, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics83, 235322 (2011)

work page 2011

[4] [4]

J. P. Kestner, X. Wang, L. S. Bishop, E. Barnes, and S. Das Sarma, Physical review letters110, 140502 (2013)

work page 2013

[5] [5]

Barnes, J

E. Barnes, J. Kestner, N. Nguyen, and S. Das Sarma, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 84, 235309 (2011)

work page 2011

[6] [6]

A. V. Kuhlmann, J. Houel, A. Ludwig, L. Greuter, D. Reuter, A. D. Wieck, M. Poggio, and R. J. Warburton, Nature Physics 9, 570 (2013)

work page 2013

[7] [7]

Hu and S

X. Hu and S. Das Sarma, Physical review letters96, 100501 (2006)

work page 2006

[8] [8]

Culcer, X

D. Culcer, X. Hu, and S. Das Sarma, Applied Physics Letters95 (2009)

work page 2009

[9] [9]

Houel, A

J. Houel, A. Kuhlmann, L. Greuter, F. Xue, M. Poggio, B. Gerardot, P. Dalgarno, A. Badolato, P. Petroff, A. Ludwig, et al., Physical review letters108, 107401 (2012)

work page 2012

[10] [10]

Hauck, F

M. Hauck, F. Seilmeier, S. Beavan, A. Badolato, P. Petroff, and A. Högele, Physical Review B90, 235306 (2014)

work page 2014

[11] [11]

Kylänpää and H.-P

I. Kylänpää and H.-P. Komsa, Phys. Rev. B92, 205418 (2015)

work page 2015

[12] [12]

Van der Donck, M

M. Van der Donck, M. Zarenia, and F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B96, 035131 (2017)

work page 2017

[13] [13]

Courtade, M

E. Courtade, M. Semina, M. Manca, M. M. Glazov, C. Robert, F. Cadiz, G. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, 17 M. Pierre, W. Escoffier, E. L. Ivchenko, P. Renucci, X. Marie, T. Amand, and B. Urbaszek, Phys. Rev. B96, 085302 (2017)

work page 2017

[14] [14]

C. Fey, P. Schmelcher, A. Imamoglu, and R. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. B101, 195417 (2020)

work page 2020

[15] [15]

Klein, M

J. Klein, M. Florian, A. Hötger, A. Steinhoff, A. Delhomme, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, F. Jahnke, A. W. Holleitner, M. Potemski, C. Faugeras, A. V. Stier, and J. J. Finley, Phys. Rev. B105, L041302 (2022)

work page 2022

[16] [16]

R. Y. Kezerashvili, S. M. Tsiklauri, and A. Dublin, Phys. Rev. B109, 085406 (2024)

work page 2024

[17] [17]

Perea-Causin, S

R. Perea-Causin, S. Brem, O. Schmidt, and E. Malic, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036903 (2024)

work page 2024

[18] [18]

Sidler, P

M. Sidler, P. Back, O. Cotlet, A. Srivastava, T. Fink, M. Kroner, E. Demler, and A. Imamoglu, Nature Physics13, 255 (2017)

work page 2017

[19] [19]

D. K. Efimkin and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B95, 035417 (2017)

work page 2017

[20] [20]

S. O. Krüger, H. Stolz, and S. Scheel, Physical Review B101, 235204 (2020)

work page 2020

[21] [21]

Bergen, V

M. Bergen, V. Walther, B. Panda, M. Harati, S. Siegeroth, J. Heckötter, and M. Aßmann, Nature Communications 14, 8235 (2023)

work page 2023

[22] [22]

Kazimierczuk, D

T. Kazimierczuk, D. Fröhlich, S. Scheel, H. Stolz, and M. Bayer, Nature514, 343 (2014)

work page 2014

[23] [23]

M. A. Versteegh, S. Steinhauer, J. Bajo, T. Lettner, A. Soro, A. Romanova, S. Gyger, L. Schweickert, A. Mysyrowicz, and V. Zwiller, Physical Review B104, 245206 (2021)

work page 2021

[24] [24]

Chakrabarti, K

P. Chakrabarti, K. Morin, D. Lagarde, X. Marie, and T. Boulier, Physical Review Letters134, 126902 (2025)

work page 2025

[25] [25]

Zielińska-Raczyńska and D

S. Zielińska-Raczyńska and D. Ziemkiewicz, arXiv e-prints , arXiv (2026)

work page 2026

[26] [26]

Brewin, L

A. Brewin, L. A. Gallagher, J. D. Pritchett, H. Q. Wong, R. M. Potvliege, S. J. Clark, and M. P. Jones, New Journal of Physics26, 113018 (2024)

work page 2024

[27] [27]

Walther and A

V. Walther and A. S. Sørensen, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 033607 (2023)

work page 2023

[28] [28]

Walther, L

V. Walther, L. Zhang, S. F. Yelin, and T. Pohl, Phys. Rev. B105, 075307 (2022)

work page 2022

[29] [29]

S. A. Lynch, C. Hodges, S. Mandal, W. Langbein, R. P. Singh, L. A. Gallagher, J. D. Pritchett, D. Pizzey, J. P. Rogers, C. S. Adams,et al., Physical Review Materials5, 084602 (2021)

work page 2021

[30] [30]

Brewin, M

A. Brewin, M. P. A. Jones, and S. J. Clark, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12466 (2026), arXiv:2602.12466

work page arXiv 2026

[31] [31]

Hodby, T

J. Hodby, T. Jenkins, C. Schwab, H. Tamura, and D. Trivich, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics9, 1429 (1976)

work page 1976

[32] [32]

N. Naka, I. Akimoto, M. Shirai, and K.-i. Kan’no, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics85, 035209 (2012)

work page 2012

[33] [33]

A detailed classical treatment of Rydberg exciton–ion scattering, including the backward glory effect, is also provided

See Supplemental Material for additional details on the exciton–ion interaction potential, the multichannel Schrödinger equation, and the boundary conditions. A detailed classical treatment of Rydberg exciton–ion scattering, including the backward glory effect, is also provided

work page

[34] [34]

Heckötter, M

J. Heckötter, M. Freitag, D. Fröhlich, M. Aßmann, M. Bayer, M. Semina, and M. Glazov, Physical Review B96, 125142 (2017)

work page 2017

[35] [35]

Hahn, Physical Review A62, 042703 (2000)

Y. Hahn, Physical Review A62, 042703 (2000)

work page 2000

[36] [36]

Saffman, T

M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Reviews of modern physics82, 2313 (2010)

work page 2010

[37] [37]

Duspayev, X

A. Duspayev, X. Han, M. A. Viray, L. Ma, J. Zhao, and G. Raithel, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023114 (2021)

work page 2021

[38] [38]

Kamenski and V

A. Kamenski and V. Ovsiannikov, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics47, 095002 (2014)

work page 2014

[39] [39]

Côté and A

R. Côté and A. Dalgarno, Physical Review A62, 012709 (2000)

work page 2000

[40] [40]

Karman, L

T. Karman, L. Janssen, R. Sprenkels, and G. C. Groenenboom, The Journal of Chemical Physics141 (2014)

work page 2014

[41] [41]

I. J. Thompson and F. M. Nunes,Nuclear reactions for astrophysics: principles, calculation and applications of low- energy reactions (Cambridge University Press, 2009)

work page 2009

[42] [42]

R. D. Levine and R. B. Bernstein, (No Title) (1987)

work page 1987

[43] [43]

Landau, Oxford: Pergamon Press) p422, 817

L. Landau, Oxford: Pergamon Press) p422, 817

work page

[44] [44]

Ríos and Athanasopoulou,Introduction to Cold and Ultracold Chemistry (Springer, 2020)

P. Ríos and Athanasopoulou,Introduction to Cold and Ultracold Chemistry (Springer, 2020)

work page 2020

[45] [45]

J. A. Adam, Physics reports356, 229 (2002)

work page 2002

[46] [46]

M. V. Berry and K. Mount, Reports on Progress in Physics35, 315 (1972)

work page 1972

[47] [47]

Heckötter, A

J. Heckötter, A. Farenbruch, D. Fröhlich, M. Aßmann, D. Yakovlev, M. Bayer, M. Semina, M. Glazov, P. Rommel, J. Ertl, et al., Physics Reports1100, 1 (2025)

work page 2025

[48] [48]

J. P. Rogers, L. A. P. Gallagher, D. Pizzey, J. D. Pritchett, C. S. Adams, M. P. A. Jones, C. Hodges, W. Langbein, and S. A. Lynch, Phys. Rev. B105, 115206 (2022)

work page 2022

[49] [49]

Idziaszek, A

Z. Idziaszek, A. Simoni, T. Calarco, and P. S. Julienne, New Journal of Physics13, 083005 (2011)

work page 2011

[50] [50]

M. Lara, P. G. Jambrina, J.-M. Launay, and F. J. Aoiz, Phys. Rev. A91, 030701 (2015)

work page 2015

[51] [51]

G. F. Gribakin and V. V. Flambaum, Phys. Rev. A48, 546 (1993)

work page 1993

[52] [52]

Jachymski, M

K. Jachymski, M. Krych, P. S. Julienne, and Z. Idziaszek, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 213202 (2013)

work page 2013

[53] [53]

Vogt and G

E. Vogt and G. H. Wannier, Physical Review95, 1190 (1954)

work page 1954

[54] [54]

I. I. Fabrikant and H. Hotop, Physical Review A63, 022706 (2001)

work page 2001

[55] [55]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory , 3rd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2013)

work page 2013

[56] [56]

Braaten and H.-W

E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, Physics Reports428, 259 (2006)

work page 2006

[57] [57]

T. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Li, Z. Lu, S. Miao, Z. Lian, Y. Meng, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, D. Smirnov, C. Zhang, and S.-F. Shi, Nano Letters20, 7635 (2020). 18

work page 2020

[58] [58]

Berngruber, D

M. Berngruber, D. J. Bosworth, O. A. Herrera-Sancho, V. S. V. Anasuri, N. Zuber, F. Hummel, J. Krauter, F. Meinert, R. Löw, P. Schmelcher, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 083001 (2024)

work page 2024

[59] [59]

Scheuler, J

N. Scheuler, J. Main, P. Rommel, F. Pfeiffer, S. Scheel, and P. A. Belov, Phys. Rev. B113, 115413 (2026)

work page 2026

[60] [60]

Domcke, H

W. Domcke, H. Koppel, and D. R. Yarkony, Conical intersections: electronic structure, dynamics & spectroscopy , Vol. 15 (World Scientific, 2004)

work page 2004

[61] [61]

L. M. C. Janssen,Cold collision dynamics of NH radicals (Sl: sn, 2012)

work page 2012

[62] [62]

Brouard and C

M. Brouard and C. Vallance,Tutorials in molecular reaction dynamics (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015)

work page 2015

[63] [63]

Friedrich,Classical Scattering Theory (Springer, 2015) pp

H. Friedrich,Classical Scattering Theory (Springer, 2015) pp. 1–21

work page 2015

[64] [64]

R. G. Newton,Scattering theory of waves and particles (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

work page 2013