pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27370 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Phase-Transition Induced Magnetic Domain Evolution and Magnetization Dynamics in FePt/FeRh Bilayers for Advanced Heat-Assisted Magnetic Recording

Saroj K. Mishra , Y. Sasaki , S. Isogami , I. Suzuki , Keerthana P , J. Mohanty , Y. K. Takahashi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 03:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords FePt/FeRh bilayersheat-assisted magnetic recordingphase transitiondomain wall mobilitycoercivity reductioninterfacial exchange couplingMFM imagingTR-MOKE
0
0 comments X

The pith

Phase transition in FeRh reduces coercivity in FePt/FeRh bilayers mainly by increasing domain wall mobility via interfacial coupling, not by softening anisotropy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines FePt/FeRh bilayers to address the high coercivity and heating demands of heat-assisted magnetic recording. As FeRh undergoes its antiferromagnetic-to-ferromagnetic transition near 350 K, it triggers smaller domains and greater domain wall mobility in the FePt layer through interfacial exchange. Magnetometry records a 40% coercivity drop from 300 K to 400 K, while TR-MOKE shows only a 0.4 T shift in effective anisotropy. MFM imaging confirms the 30% domain size reduction and stronger contrast. The authors conclude that the coercivity reduction stems from enhanced domain dynamics and interfacial interactions rather than changes to the FePt intrinsic anisotropy.

Core claim

In FePt/FeRh bilayers the antiferromagnetic-to-ferromagnetic phase transition of FeRh near 350 K produces a 30% reduction in magnetic domain size and enhances domain wall mobility through strong interfacial exchange coupling; this coupling assists magnetization reversal in the FePt layer and yields a 40% coercivity reduction from 300 K to 400 K while the effective anisotropy field changes by only 0.4 T, showing that the intrinsic anisotropy of FePt remains largely preserved.

What carries the argument

phase-transition-induced domain wall mobility coupled with interfacial magnetic interactions

If this is right

  • A 40% coercivity reduction occurs while the FePt intrinsic anisotropy stays nearly constant.
  • Magnetization switching becomes possible under lower thermal load than required for single-layer FePt.
  • Domain size shrinks by 30% and phase contrast increases during the transition.
  • FePt/FeRh bilayers offer a route to higher-density HAMR media with reduced power consumption.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same interfacial-coupling mechanism could be tested in other antiferromagnet/ferromagnet pairs to achieve tunable switching temperatures.
  • Real-time domain imaging during the transition might guide design of bilayer thickness or interface roughness for specific operating temperatures.
  • Combining this phase-transition assistance with voltage-controlled anisotropy could further lower the required switching field.

Load-bearing premise

That the small 0.4 T change in effective anisotropy field measured by TR-MOKE fully rules out any contribution from anisotropy softening during the phase transition.

What would settle it

Inserting a thin non-magnetic spacer layer at the FePt/FeRh interface while preserving the FeRh phase transition, then re-measuring the temperature-dependent coercivity reduction, would test whether the reduction requires direct interfacial coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27370 by I. Suzuki, J. Mohanty, Keerthana P, Saroj K. Mishra, S. Isogami, Y. K. Takahashi, Y. Sasaki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of Thermally driven exchange view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the FePt single view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Depth-resolved microstructural characterization of the FePt/FeRh bilayer. (a) Cross-sectional HAADF-STEM image view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. In-plane and out-of-plane magnetic hysteresis loops view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Normalized MFM images of the FePt single layer and FePt/FeRh bilayer acquired at various temperatures. The view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Temperature dependence of the normalized (a) phase view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Typical wave forms of TRMOKE data at temper view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Achieving ultrahigh recording densities with low power consumption is a central challenge for next generation heat assisted magnetic recording (HAMR), as conventional L10 FePt media require intense laser heating due to their high coercivity (Hc) and high Curie temperature (700 K). Here, we address this issue using FePt/FeRh bilayers, where the antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic transition of FeRh near 350 K generates strong interfacial exchange coupling that assists magnetization switching in the FePt layer. Magnetometry measurements reveal a 40% reduction in Hc from 300 K to 400 K in the bilayer, compared to only 8% in single layer FePt. Temperature dependent MFM directly captures phase transition induced domain evolution, showing a 30% reduction in domain size and enhanced phase contrast. TR-MOKE measurements reveal only a minor (0.4 T) modification of the effective anisotropy field during phase transition, confirming that the intrinsic anisotropy of FePt remains largely preserved. These results demonstrate that the reduction in Hc in FePt/FeRh bilayers is primarily governed by phase transition induced domain wall mobility coupled with interfacial magnetic interactions, rather than by intrinsic anisotropy softening. This mechanism provides a pathway toward efficient magnetization switching under reduced thermal load, making FePt/FeRh heterostructures promising candidates for advanced HAMR media.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents experimental results on FePt/FeRh bilayers for heat-assisted magnetic recording. It reports that the antiferromagnetic-to-ferromagnetic phase transition in FeRh near 350 K generates interfacial exchange coupling, producing a 40% reduction in FePt coercivity (Hc) between 300 K and 400 K (versus 8% in single-layer FePt). Temperature-dependent magnetometry, MFM imaging (showing 30% domain-size reduction and enhanced contrast), and TR-MOKE (showing a 0.4 T shift in effective anisotropy field) are used to argue that the Hc drop arises primarily from phase-transition-induced domain-wall mobility and interfacial interactions rather than intrinsic anisotropy softening in FePt.

Significance. If the central interpretation is substantiated, the work identifies a mechanism for assisting magnetization reversal in high-anisotropy FePt media via interfacial coupling without substantial anisotropy loss, offering a route to lower laser power in HAMR. The multi-technique temperature-dependent dataset (magnetometry, MFM, TR-MOKE) provides direct visualization of domain evolution and quantitative Hc and anisotropy shifts, which is a strength for an experimental materials study.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / TR-MOKE results] Abstract and TR-MOKE results section: the statement that the 0.4 T modification 'confirms that the intrinsic anisotropy of FePt remains largely preserved' is not supported by a baseline Hk value at 300 K, its temperature dependence, error bars on the 0.4 T figure, or any calculation showing how this small average Delta Hk would (or would not) produce the observed 40% Delta Hc in the bilayer geometry. Because Hc in granular media is controlled by nucleation and pinning rather than coherent rotation, even a modest local Delta K at the interface could contribute substantially to the Hc drop; the data therefore do not yet quantitatively exclude anisotropy softening as a contributing factor.
  2. [MFM results] MFM results section: the 30% domain-size reduction and enhanced phase contrast are presented as evidence for increased domain-wall mobility from interfacial coupling. However, the same observations are also consistent with local reductions in wall energy due to interfacial anisotropy variations or pinning-site softening; no micromagnetic modeling, control samples (e.g., decoupled bilayers), or wall-velocity measurements are provided to discriminate between these mechanisms.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Experimental methods] Sample preparation details (thicknesses, deposition conditions, interface quality) and raw data statistics (number of measured devices, error bars on all temperature sweeps) should be expanded for reproducibility.
  2. [Magnetometry results] The temperature range 300–400 K straddles the FeRh transition; clarification is needed on whether the reported Hc and anisotropy values are taken above or below the transition midpoint and how thermal hysteresis is handled.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point and provide point-by-point responses below. Where appropriate, we will revise the manuscript to improve clarity, add supporting details, and address potential alternative interpretations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / TR-MOKE results] Abstract and TR-MOKE results section: the statement that the 0.4 T modification 'confirms that the intrinsic anisotropy of FePt remains largely preserved' is not supported by a baseline Hk value at 300 K, its temperature dependence, error bars on the 0.4 T figure, or any calculation showing how this small average Delta Hk would (or would not) produce the observed 40% Delta Hc in the bilayer geometry. Because Hc in granular media is controlled by nucleation and pinning rather than coherent rotation, even a modest local Delta K at the interface could contribute substantially to the Hc drop; the data therefore do not yet quantitatively exclude anisotropy softening as a contributing factor.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not explicitly tabulate the 300 K baseline Hk value from TR-MOKE, include error bars on the reported 0.4 T shift, or provide a quantitative estimate relating this small average Delta Hk to the observed 40% Delta Hc. In the revised version we will add the measured 300 K Hk, error bars on the temperature-dependent shift, and a brief calculation showing that a uniform 0.4 T reduction in effective anisotropy (typical FePt Hk ~ 5-7 T) would produce only a few percent change in nucleation field under the Stoner-Wohlfarth or pinning models relevant to granular media. This supports our interpretation that the large Hc drop is not primarily from uniform anisotropy softening. We agree, however, that local interfacial K variations could still contribute and will add a short discussion noting this possibility while emphasizing that the MFM-observed domain-size reduction and the temperature correlation with the FeRh transition favor the interfacial-exchange mechanism. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [MFM results] MFM results section: the 30% domain-size reduction and enhanced phase contrast are presented as evidence for increased domain-wall mobility from interfacial coupling. However, the same observations are also consistent with local reductions in wall energy due to interfacial anisotropy variations or pinning-site softening; no micromagnetic modeling, control samples (e.g., decoupled bilayers), or wall-velocity measurements are provided to discriminate between these mechanisms.

    Authors: We agree that the MFM images alone are consistent with multiple mechanisms, including local wall-energy reduction from interfacial anisotropy gradients or softened pinning sites. Our interpretation relies on the combined dataset: the Hc drop occurs precisely at the FeRh transition temperature, TR-MOKE shows only minor average anisotropy change, and domain contrast increases without evidence of uniform FePt softening. In the revision we will expand the MFM discussion to explicitly list these alternative explanations and state that the data do not uniquely discriminate them. We will also reference prior literature on FeRh/FePt exchange coupling to support the mobility-increase scenario. We note that dedicated micromagnetic simulations, decoupled control bilayers, or direct wall-velocity measurements lie outside the scope of the present experimental study and would require new sample fabrication and instrumentation. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • We cannot supply new micromagnetic simulations, decoupled control samples, or wall-velocity measurements within the timeframe of this revision, as these require additional experimental resources beyond the current work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental measurements with interpretive conclusion

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental results from magnetometry (40% Hc reduction in bilayer vs 8% in single-layer FePt), temperature-dependent MFM (30% domain-size reduction and enhanced contrast), and TR-MOKE (0.4 T change in effective anisotropy field). The central claim interprets these independent observations to attribute Hc reduction to phase-transition-induced domain-wall mobility and interfacial coupling rather than anisotropy softening. No equations, fitted parameters, self-referential derivations, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The logic does not reduce any prediction or result to its own inputs by construction; it is a comparison of measured quantities against external benchmarks (single-layer control). This is the expected non-circular outcome for an experimental study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No theoretical derivation is present. The paper rests entirely on experimental observations of magnetic properties.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5581 in / 1243 out tokens · 49880 ms · 2026-05-08T03:14:25.163151+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    the internet of things

    V. ¨Ozdemir and N. Hekim, Birth of industry 5.0: Making sense of big data with artificial intelligence,“the internet of things” and next-generation technology policy, OMICS 22, 65 (2018)

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    D. R.-J. G.-J. Rydning, J. Reinsel, and J. Gantz, The digitization of the world from edge to core, IDC16, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    D. Zha, Z. P. Bhat, K.-H. Lai, F. Yang, Z. Jiang, S. Zhong, and X. Hu, Data-centric artificial intelligence: A survey, ACM Comput.57, 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Yang and F.-B

    J. Yang and F.-B. Sun, A comprehensive review of hard-disk drive reliability, inAnnual Reliability and Maintainability. Symposium. 1999 Proceedings (Cat. No. 99CH36283)(IEEE, 1999) pp. 403–409

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Albuquerque, S

    G. Albuquerque, S. Hernandez, M. T. Kief, D. Mauri, and L. Wang, Hdd reader technology roadmap to an areal density of 4 tbpsi and beyond, IEEE Trans. Magn.58, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    A. Q. Wu, Y. Kubota, T. Klemmer, T. Rausch, C. Peng, Y. Peng, D. Karns, X. Zhu, Y. Ding, E. K. Chang,et al., Hamr areal density demonstration of 1+ tbpsi on spin- stand, IEEE Trans. Magn.49, 779 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Marchon, T

    B. Marchon, T. Pitchford, Y.-T. Hsia, and S. Gangopad- hyay, The head-disk interface roadmap to an areal density of 4 tbit/in2, Adv. Tribol.2013, 521086 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Parker, O

    G. Parker, O. Mosendz, E. Champion, B. Stipe, X. Wang, T. Klemmer, G. Ju, and A. Ajan, A hamr media tech- nology roadmap to an areal density of 4 tb/in (2), IEEE Trans. Magn.50, 3100108 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Weller, A

    D. Weller, A. Moser, L. Folks, M. E. Best, W. Lee, M. F. Toney, M. Schwickert, J.-U. Thiele, and M. F. Doerner, High k/sub u/materials approach to 100 gbits/in/sup 2, IEEE Trans. Magn.36, 10 (2000)

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    G. W. Qin, Y. Ren, N. Xiao, B. Yang, L. Zuo, and K. Oikawa, Development of high density magnetic record- ing media for hard disk drives: materials science issues 10 and challenges, Int. Mater. Rev.54, 157 (2009)

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    J. Chen, C. Sun, and G. M. Chow, A review of l10 fept films for high-density magnetic recording, Int. J. Prod. Dev.5, 238 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    F. Wang, H. Xing, and X. Xu, Overcoming the trilemma issues of ultrahigh density perpendicular mag- netic recording media by l10-fe (co) pt materials, inSpin, Vol. 5 (World Scientific, 2015) p. 1530002

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Weller, G

    D. Weller, G. Parker, O. Mosendz, A. Lyberatos, D. Mitin, N. Y. Safonova, and M. Albrecht, Fept heat assisted magnetic recording media, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B34(2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    X. Wang, K. Gao, H. Zhou, A. Itagi, M. Seigler, and E. Gage, Hamr recording limitations and extendibility, IEEE Trans. Magn.49, 686 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    YK, Microstructure control for magnetic thin films with high functionality, J

    T. YK, Microstructure control for magnetic thin films with high functionality, J. Magn. Soc. Jpn.46, 76 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    T. D. Trinh, S. Rajauria, R. Smith, E. Schreck, Q. Dai, and F. E. Talke, Temperature-induced near-field trans- ducer failure in heat-assisted magnetic recording, IEEE Trans. Magn.56, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Ma,Study of Dynamics and Nanoscale Heat Transfer of Head Disk Interface in Hard Disk Drives(University of California, Berkeley, 2018)

    Y. Ma,Study of Dynamics and Nanoscale Heat Transfer of Head Disk Interface in Hard Disk Drives(University of California, Berkeley, 2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    B. Xu, Z. Liu, R. Ji, Y. Toh, J. Hu, J. Li, J. Zhang, K. Ye, and C. Chia, Thermal issues and their effects on heat-assisted magnetic recording system, J. Appl. Phys. 111(2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Zhang, R

    J. Zhang, R. Ji, J. Xu, J. Ng, B. Xu, S. Hu, H. Yuan, and S. Piramanayagam, Lubrication for heat-assisted magnetic recording media, IEEE Trans. Magn.42, 2546 (2006)

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    Chirkova, F

    A. Chirkova, F. Bittner, K. Nenkov, N. Baranov, L. Schultz, K. Nielsch, and T. Woodcock, The effect of the microstructure on the antiferromagnetic to ferro- magnetic transition in ferh alloys, Acta Mater.131, 31 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Suzuki, T

    I. Suzuki, T. Koike, M. Itoh, T. Taniyama, and T. Sato, Stability of ferromagnetic state of epitaxially grown or- dered ferh thin films, J. Appl. Phys.105(2009)

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Thiele, S

    J.-U. Thiele, S. Maat, and E. E. Fullerton, Ferh/fept exchange spring films for thermally assisted magnetic recording media, Appl. Phys. Lett.82, 2859 (2003)

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    W. Lu, C. He, Z. Chen, J. Fan, and B. Yan, Magnetic properties of epitaxial-grown exchange-coupled fept/ferh bilayer films, Appl. Phys. A108, 149 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    N. T. Nam, W. Lu, and T. Suzuki, Exchange bias of ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic in fept/ferh bilayers, J. Appl. Phys.105(2009)

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    Koyama, H

    S. Koyama, H. Ogata, M. Konno, T. Goto, and K. Koike, Reduction of coercivity in fept-ferh bilayer films by heat- ing, IEEE Trans. Magn.41, 2854 (2005)

    work page 2005

  26. [26]

    Sasaki, I

    Y. Sasaki, I. Suzuki, R. Mandal, S. Kasai, and Y. K. Takahashi, Thermal modulation of magnetization dy- namics in nanometer-thick l 10-fept nanogranular and continuous films for high-density magnetic recording me- dia, ACS Appl. Nano Mater.6, 5901 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    S. C. Chen, C. D. Chen, T. H. Sun, and W. H. Hong, Effects of intermediate layers on chemical ordering and hard magnetic properties of l10 fept films, Adv. Mater. Res.747, 27 (2013)

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    P. Negi, M. Gupta, R. Rawat, R. Joshi, H. Bhatt, S. Singh, V. Reddy, and H. Kumar, Formation of b2- ordered ferh alloy thin films on annealing of pure and ni- trogen doped fe/rh multilayers, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 581, 170941 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Ogawa, A

    D. Ogawa, A. Bolyachkin, A. R. Dilipan, N. Kulesh, H. Sepehri-Amin, and Y. K. Takahashi, Exchange- coupled fe-pt/ru/fe-pt nanogranular films as poten- tial heat-assisted-magnetic-recording media with reduced writing temperature, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 054060 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Mitsumata, A

    C. Mitsumata, A. Sakuma, K. Fukamichi, and M. Tsun- oda, Uncompensated spin elements in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic bilayer with non-collinear spin struc- ture, Mater. Trans.47, 11 (2006)

    work page 2006

  31. [31]

    Y. Liu, C. Jin, Y. Fu, J. Teng, M. Li, Z. Liu, and G. Yu, Configuration of the uncompensated moments at the fm/afm interface with a nm spacer, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.41, 205006 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Massey, K

    J. Massey, K. Matsumoto, M. Strungaru, R. Temple, T. Higo, K. Kondou, R. Evans, G. Burnell, R. Chantrell, Y. Otani,et al., Phase boundary exchange coupling in the mixed magnetic phase regime of a pd-doped ferh epi- layer, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 024403 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    force microscopy

    Y. Martin and H. K. Wickramasinghe, Magnetic imaging by“force microscopy”with 1000 ˚ a resolution, Appl. Phys. Lett.50, 1455 (1987)

    work page 1987

  34. [34]

    T. P. Almeida, R. Temple, J. Massey, K. Fallon, D. Mc- Grouther, T. Moore, C. H. Marrows, and S. McVitie, Quantitative tem imaging of the magnetostructural and phase transitions in ferh thin film systems, Sci. Rep.7, 17835 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Thiaville, S

    A. Thiaville, S. Rohart, ´E. Ju´ e, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Dy- namics of dzyaloshinskii domain walls in ultrathin mag- netic films, Europhys. Lett.100, 57002 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    Kumar Mishra, H

    S. Kumar Mishra, H. Prasanth Perumal, and J. Mo- hanty, Engineering perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and dzyaloshinskii–moriya interaction in gd–fe thin films for spintronics applications, J. Appl. Phys.136(2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    S. K. Mishra, P. Keerthana, Y. K. Takahashi, and J. Mo- hanty, Growth rate induced modulation of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and domain dynamics in ferrimag- netic tbfe thin film, Surf. Interfaces , 109114 (2026)

    work page 2026

  38. [38]

    Sasaki, R

    Y. Sasaki, R. Hiramatsu, Y. Kota, T. Kubota, Y. Sonobe, A. Sakuma, K. Takanashi, S. Kasai, and Y. K. Takahashi, Magnetization precession at sub-terahertz frequencies in polycrystalline cu2sb-type (mn–cr) alge ultrathin films, Small18, 2200378 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Iihama, S

    S. Iihama, S. Mizukami, H. Naganuma, M. Oogane, Y. Ando, and T. Miyazaki, Gilbert damping constants of ta/cofeb/mgo (ta) thin films measured by optical detec- tion of precessional magnetization dynamics, Phys. Rev. B89, 174416 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    Bentley, Y

    P. Bentley, Y. Sasaki, I. Suzuki, S. Isogami, Y. Takahashi, and H. Suto, Development ofl1 0-ordered fept with low damping and large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy by engineering the nanostructure, Appl. Phys. Lett.126 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    X. Ma, L. Ma, P. He, H. Zhao, S. Zhou, and G. L¨ upke, Role of antisite disorder on intrinsic gilbert damping in l10 fept films, Phys. Rev. B91, 014438 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Sasaki, K

    Y. Sasaki, K. Suzuki, A. Sugihara, A. Kamimaki, S. Iihama, Y. Ando, and S. Mizukami, All-optical de- tection of magnetization precession in tunnel junctions under applied voltage, Appl. Phys. Express10, 023002 (2017)

    work page 2017