pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00338 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Staircase mechanical energy growth in optomechanical systems of median mechanical frequencies

Yi Xiao , Yi Wu , Qi-Kai Zhan , Jin Lian Zhang , Bing He , Qing Lin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 19:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph
keywords cavity optomechanicstwo-tone drivemechanical energystaircase evolutionphonon laserfrequency mismatchnonlinear dynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cavity optomechanical systems with median mechanical frequencies show staircase growth in mechanical energy under two-tone drives where tone spacing matches the resonator frequency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a previously unrecognized staircase pattern appears in the energy of the mechanical resonator inside certain cavity optomechanical systems. This pattern emerges only when the built-in mechanical frequency sits in a middle range and the two drive tones differ by exactly that frequency. A reader would care because the pattern fills a documented gap in two-tone-drive dynamics, while its rapid energy rise points toward phonon-laser use and its sensitivity to small mismatches points toward precision sensing.

Core claim

In cavity optomechanical systems whose mechanical frequency lies in a median range, a two-tone drive whose frequency difference equals the mechanical frequency produces a staircase evolution in mechanical energy. The pattern depends on fabrication parameters such as mechanical frequency and quality factor, and on drive conditions such as unequal tone powers or small mismatches; only in this median-frequency regime do an emergent bifurcation from power imbalance and opposite-sign mismatch responses appear.

What carries the argument

The staircase evolution pattern of mechanical energy, generated by radiation-force nonlinearity when the two-tone frequency difference is tuned to the built-in mechanical frequency.

If this is right

  • Rapid mechanical-energy growth supplies a route to phonon-laser generation.
  • Strong sensitivity to drive-tone mismatches supplies a route to high-precision sensing.
  • An emergent bifurcation appears only when the two tones have unequal powers.
  • Responses to positive and negative frequency mismatches are entirely different, a feature absent in extreme-frequency regimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Fabrication tolerances on mechanical frequency will determine whether the staircase is observable in real devices.
  • The same driving condition may produce analogous steps in other nonlinear oscillators that possess comparable frequency scales.
  • Systematic sweeps of mechanical frequency across fabricated samples could map the boundaries of the median regime.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanical frequency must lie in a median range, neither very large nor very small, and the two drive tones must differ by exactly that frequency.

What would settle it

Drive a fabricated median-frequency device with two tones whose spacing differs from the mechanical frequency or use a device with extreme mechanical frequency and record whether the energy still rises in discrete steps.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00338 by Bing He, Jin Lian Zhang, Qi-Kai Zhan, Qing Lin, Yi Wu, Yi Xiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. An OMS driven by a two-tone field with the example of view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Four different scenarios of evolving mechanical ene view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Comparison of the evolution trajectories for the view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) The oscillatory staircase evolution due to diffe view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) A bifurcation due to the difference in the powers o view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) The dynamical processes due to the positive value view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Owing to the radiation-force-induced nonlinearity, cavity optomechanical systems (COMS) exhibit dynamical phenomena such as back-action induced oscillation, chaos, mechanical amplitude locking, and anomalous stabilization, which occur under different driving conditions and different system parameters. We here identify a previously unknown dynamical pattern of staircase evolution for the energy of mechanical resonator, when a COMS with neither very large nor very small built-in mechanical frequency is driven by a two-tone field, which satisfies a condition that the frequency difference of the two tones matches the built-in mechanical frequency. The properties of this phenomenon are analyzed for the different system parameters due to fabrication such as mechanical frequencies and quality factors, as well as under the varied driving conditions such as unequal drive tone powers and mismatched drive tone difference from the mechanical frequency. Some special features, such as an emergent bifurcation due to the tone power difference, together with the totally different responses of the system to the drive tone mismatches of opposite signs, are discovered to exist only in this type of COMS with median mechanical frequencies. This work fills a gap in the study of the dynamics of COMS under two-tone drives. In the aspect of applications, the rapid increase of mechanical energy exhibited in the phenomenon promises phonon laser generation, and the sensitive dynamical response to the drive tone mismatches offers a potential approach to high-precision sensing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript identifies a previously unknown 'staircase' evolution pattern in the mechanical resonator energy of cavity optomechanical systems (COMS) with median (neither very large nor very small) built-in mechanical frequencies, when driven by a two-tone field whose frequency difference exactly matches the mechanical frequency ω_m. Using numerical integration of the optomechanical equations, it analyzes the dependence on fabrication parameters (ω_m, mechanical Q) and drive conditions (tone-power imbalance, frequency mismatch), reporting emergent features such as power-imbalance bifurcation and opposite-sign mismatch asymmetry that appear only in the median-frequency regime. Applications to phonon-laser generation and high-precision sensing are suggested.

Significance. If the numerical observations are robust and the median regime can be quantitatively delimited, the work would fill a documented gap between resolved-sideband and unresolved-sideband two-tone dynamics in optomechanics. The reported staircase growth and sign-asymmetric mismatch response are potentially useful for applications. However, the absence of analytical derivations, phase diagrams, or explicit bounds on the 'median' window limits immediate impact and reproducibility.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Numerical Results): the central claim that the staircase, bifurcation, and opposite-sign mismatch asymmetry 'exist only in this type of COMS with median mechanical frequencies' is load-bearing, yet no quantitative interval for the median regime (e.g., bounds on ω_m/κ) or phase diagram in the (ω_m/κ, drive-strength) plane is supplied. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the reported features occupy a broad intermediate window or a narrow parameter sliver, undermining the uniqueness assertion.
  2. [§4] §4 (Parameter sweeps): the manuscript states that the features are analyzed 'for the different system parameters due to fabrication such as mechanical frequencies and quality factors,' but reports only selected numerical trajectories rather than systematic scans or error estimates on the integration. This leaves open whether the staircase persists under realistic fabrication spreads in ω_m.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abbreviation 'COMS' is introduced in the abstract but could be spelled out on first use in the main text for clarity.
  2. Figure captions should explicitly state the integration time, step size, and initial conditions used for the energy trajectories to allow reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions planned.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Numerical Results): the central claim that the staircase, bifurcation, and opposite-sign mismatch asymmetry 'exist only in this type of COMS with median mechanical frequencies' is load-bearing, yet no quantitative interval for the median regime (e.g., bounds on ω_m/κ) or phase diagram in the (ω_m/κ, drive-strength) plane is supplied. Without these, it is impossible to determine whether the reported features occupy a broad intermediate window or a narrow parameter sliver, undermining the uniqueness assertion.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative bounds on the median regime and a phase diagram would strengthen the uniqueness claim. In the revised manuscript we will add further numerical integrations over an extended range of ω_m/κ and drive amplitudes, from which we will extract and report the interval of ω_m/κ in which the staircase, bifurcation, and sign-asymmetric mismatch features appear. A phase diagram in the (ω_m/κ, normalized drive strength) plane will be included to delineate the intermediate regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Parameter sweeps): the manuscript states that the features are analyzed 'for the different system parameters due to fabrication such as mechanical frequencies and quality factors,' but reports only selected numerical trajectories rather than systematic scans or error estimates on the integration. This leaves open whether the staircase persists under realistic fabrication spreads in ω_m.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the present version shows only representative trajectories. The revised §4 will contain systematic two-dimensional sweeps over mechanical frequency and quality factor, together with error bars obtained from ensembles of integrations with varied initial conditions and tolerances. These additions will directly address the robustness of the staircase under realistic spreads in fabrication parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; pattern identified via direct numerical integration of standard optomechanical equations.

full rationale

The manuscript reports a previously unobserved staircase energy growth by numerically integrating the standard cavity optomechanical equations of motion under two-tone driving where the tone difference equals the mechanical frequency. No analytic derivation is claimed that reduces to its own inputs, no parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked. The work is therefore a self-contained numerical exploration of known dynamics in a specified parameter window rather than a closed logical loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The phrase 'median mechanical frequencies' is a descriptive classification rather than a fitted quantity or new postulate.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1132 out tokens · 34676 ms · 2026-05-09T19:25:36.920503+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The intracavity field intensity evolves in a reg ular pattern to have the peak number increased by one whenever the mechanical energy goes up to a higher step; see the inset in Fig

    but in a pulsed form of drastic change, so that it successively pushe s the mechanical resonator to different orbits until the syst em reaches the final stabilization determined by the fabricati on parameters. The intracavity field intensity evolves in a reg ular pattern to have the peak number increased by one whenever the mechanical energy goes up to a hi...

    work page

  2. [2]

    27 × 1013 (the dimensionless energy is equiv- alent to phonon number), which is higher than the observed mechanical energy ⟨Em,obs ⟩ = 5

    68 × 108, and the calculated average mechanical energy is ⟨Em,st ⟩ = 6. 27 × 1013 (the dimensionless energy is equiv- alent to phonon number), which is higher than the observed mechanical energy ⟨Em,obs ⟩ = 5. 51 × 1013 on that step. In fact, during the early stage of system evolution, the calcu- lated mechanical energy according to Eq. (

    work page

  3. [3]

    is much higher than the actual value, even by 2 ∼ 3 orders of magnitude. This discrepancy is in sharp contrast to an anomalous stabi- lization under a single-tone drive [ 61], where the first-order sideband amplitude A1 keeps adjusting with the mechanical frequency shift δos induced by the optical spring effect, so that the energy calculated with Eq. ( 4) ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    5 × 105κ, the final stable step level of mechanical energy will correspondingly rise as in Fig. 5(b). However, when the power of the tone with ∆ 2 =ω m is enhanced further, for ex- ample, to E2 = 2. 0 × 105κ, the final stable step level will decrease instead. This phenomenon is similar to the anoma- lous stabilization phenomenon under a single tone drive [ ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    This character can have important applications

    is unique in the intermediate regime of mechanical frequency ω m. This character can have important applications. More specifical ly, after fixing the frequency difference of two drive tones, the loss of staircase evolution pattern due to the mismatch δ can be detected by the field spectrum. It can be used to deduce the mass of an added tiny particle to the ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavit y op- tomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    G. S. Agarwal and S. Huang, Electromagnetically induced transparency in mechanical effects of light, Phys. Rev. A 81 , 041803 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    S. Weis, R. Rivi` ere, S. Del´ eglise, E. Gavartin, O. Arci zet, A. Schliesser, and T. J. Kippenberg, Optomechanically Induce d Transparency, Science 330, 1520 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    A. H. Safavi-Naeini, T. P . Mayer Alegre, J. Chan, M. Eiche n- field, M. Winger, Q. Lin, J. T. Hill, D. E. Chang, and O. Painter , Electromagnetically induced transparency and slow light w ith optomechanics, Nature 472, 69 (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Massel, T

    F. Massel, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, S. U. Cho, H. Sa- loniemi, P . J. Hakonen, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Microwave am- 9 plification with nanomechanical resonators, Nature 480, 35 1 (2011)

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    Nunnenkamp, V

    A. Nunnenkamp, V . Sudhir, A. K. Feofanov, A. Roulet, and T . J. Kippenberg, Quantum-limited amplification and parametr ic instability in the reversed dissipation regime of cavity op tome- chanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 023604 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Quantum-limited amplificat ion via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 133904 (20 14)

    work page

  13. [13]

    Hafezi and P

    M. Hafezi and P . Rabl, Optomechanically induced nonreciproc- ity in microring resonators, Opt. Express 20, 7672 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Shen, Y .-L

    Z. Shen, Y .-L. Zhang, Y . Chen, C.-L. Zou, Y .-F. Xiao, X.-B . Zou, F.-W. Sun, G.-C. Guo and C.-H. Dong, Experimental real- ization of optomechanically induced non-reciprocity, Nat . Pho- ton. 10, 657 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    I. S. Grudinin, H. Lee, O. Painter, and K. J. V ahala, Phon on laser action in a tunable two-level system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 083901 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    H. Jing, S. K. ¨Ozdemir, X. Y . L¨ u, J. Zhang, L. Yang, and F. Nori, PT -symmetric phonon laser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053604 (2014)

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    B. He, L. Yang, and M. Xiao, Dynamical phonon laser in coupled active-passive microresonators, Phys. Rev. A 94 , 031802(R) (2016)

    work page 2016

  18. [18]

    G. Z. Wang, M. M. Zhao, Y . C. Qin, Z. Q. Yin, X. S. Jiang, and M. Xiao, Demonstration of an ultra-low-threshold phonon la ser with coupled microtoroid resonators in vacuum, Photonics R es. 5, 73 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Zhang, B

    J. Zhang, B. Peng, S. K. ¨Ozdemir, K. Pichler, D. O. Krimer, G. P . Zhao, F. Nori, Y . X. Liu, S. Rotter, and L. Yang, A phonon laser operating at an exceptional point, Nat. Photon. 12, 47 9 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Y . F. Xie, Z. Cao, B. He, and Q. Lin, PT-symmetric phonon laser under gain saturation effect, Opt. Express 28, 22580 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    X. Li, Y . Xie, S. Ding, M. Zhang, Y . He, B. He, M. Xiao, and X. Jiang, Observation of Kerr soliton microcomb locked with a phonon laser, Sci. Adv. 12, eaeb3400 (2026)

    work page 2026

  22. [22]

    M.-A. Miri, G. D’Aguanno, and A. Al` u, Optomechanical f re- quency combs, New J. Phys. 20, 043013 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Y . Hu, S. L. Ding, Y . C. Qin, J. X. Gu, W. J. Wan, M. Xiao, and X. S. Jiang, Generation of optical frequency comb via giant o p- tomechanical oscillation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 134301 (20 21)

    work page

  24. [24]

    R. C. Ng, P . Nizet, D. Navarro-Urrios, G. Arregui, M. Albrecht- sen, P . D. Garc´ ıa, S. Stobbe, C. M. Sotomayor-Torres, and G. Madiot, Intermodulation of optical frequency combs in a mul ti- mode optomechanical system, Phys. Rev. Research 5, L032028 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Y . Wang, M. Zhang, Z. Shen, G.-T. Xu, R. Niu, F.-W. Sun, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Optomechanical frequency comb based on multiple nonlinear dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 163603 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    X. Gu, J. Zhang, S. Ding, X. Jiang, B. He, and Q. Lin, Opti- cal frequency comb significantly spanned to broadband by an optomechanical resonance, Photon. Res. 12, 1981 (2024)

    work page 1981

  27. [27]

    S. Ding, B. He, Y . Wu, Y . Hu, H. Wang, W. Wan, M. Xiao, and X. Jiang, Bloch-band structure of cavity optomechanica l oscillations, Phys. Rev. Research 7, L012059 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Li and K.-D

    J.-J. Li and K.-D. Zhu, All-optical mass sensing with co upled mechanical resonator systems, Phys. Rep. 525, 223 (2013)

    work page 2013

  29. [29]

    Sansa, M

    M. Sansa, M. Defoort, A. Brenac, M. Hermouet, L. Banniar d, A. Fafin, M. Gely, C. Masselon, I. Favero, G. Jourdan, and S. Hentz, Optomechanical mass spectrometry, Nat. Commun. 11, 3781 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Gavartin, P

    E. Gavartin, P . V erlot, and T. J. Kippenberg, A hybrid on -chip optomechanical transducer for ultrasensitive force measu re- ments, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 509 (2012)

    work page 2012

  31. [31]

    Moser, J

    J. Moser, J. G¨ uttinger, A. Eichler, M. J. Esplandiu, D. E. Liu, M. I. Dykman, and A. Bachtold, Ultrasensitive force detecti on with a nanotube mechanical resonator, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 493 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Schreppler, N

    S. Schreppler, N. Spethmann, N. Brahms, T. Botter, M. Ba rrios, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Optically measuring force near the standard quantum limit, Science 344,1486(2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Mason, J

    D. Mason, J. Chen, M. Rossi, Y . Tsaturyan, and A. Schlies ser, Continuous force and displacement measurement below the standard quantum limit, Nat. Phys. 15, 745 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    L. F. Buchmann, S. Schreppler, J. Kohler, N. Spethmann, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Complex squeezing and force measure- ment beyond the standard quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 , 030801 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Wilson-Rae, N

    I. Wilson-Rae, N. Nooshi, W. Zwerger, and T. J. Kippenbe rg, Theory of ground state cooling of a mechanical oscillator us ing dynamical backaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 093901 (2007)

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    Marquardt, J

    F. Marquardt, J. P . Chen, A. A. Clerk, and S. M. Girvin, Qu an- tum theory of cavity-assisted sideband cooling of mechanic al motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 093902 (2007)

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    Teufel, J. D., T. Donner, D. Li, J. W. Harlow, M. S. Allman , K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, K. W. Lehnert, and R. W. Simmonds, Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state, Nature (London) 475, 359 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    J. Chan, T. P . Mayer Alegre, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hi ll, A. Krause, S. Gr¨ oblacher, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter, Lase r cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum gro und state, Nature 478, 89 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    B. He, L. Yang, Q. Lin, and M. Xiao, Radiation Pressure Co ol- ing as a Quantum Dynamical Process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 233604 (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    C. Wang, Q. Lin, and B. He, Breaking the optomechanical c ool- ing limit by two drive fields on a membrane-in-the- middle sys - tem, Phys. Rev. A 99, 023829 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    D. G. Lai, J. F. Huang, X. L. Yin, B. P . Hou, W. Li, D. Vi- tali, F. Nori, and J. Q, Liao, Nonreciprocal ground-state co oling of multiple mechanical resonators, Phy. Rev. A 102, 011502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    D. G. Lai, J. Huang, B. P . Hou, F. Nori, and J. Q. Liao, Domino cooling of a coupled mechanical-resonator chain via cold-damping feedback, Phys. Rev. A 103, 063509 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Vitali, S

    D. Vitali, S. Gigan, A. Ferreira, H. R. B¨ ohm, P . Tombesi , A. Guerreiro, V . V edral, A. Zeilinger, and M. Aspelmeyer, Op- tomechanical entanglement between a movable mirror and a cavity field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 030405 (2007)

    work page 2007

  44. [44]

    T. A. Palomaki, J. D. Teufel, R. W. Simmonds, and K. W. Lehn- ert, Entangling mechanical motion with microwave fields, Sc i- ence 342, 710 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Q. Lin, B. He, R. Ghobadi, and C. Simon, Fully quantum approach to optomechanical entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 90, 022309 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Riedinger, A

    R. Riedinger, A. Wallucks, I. Marinkovi´ c, C. L¨ oschnauer, M. Aspelmeyer, S. K. Hong, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Remote quantum entanglement between two micromechanical oscillators, Nature (London) 556, 473 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damsk¨ agg, J. -M. Pirkkalain en, M. Asjad, A. A. Clerk, F. Massel, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sil- lanp¨ a¨ a, Stabilized entanglement of massive mechanical oscilla- tors, Nature (London) 556, 478 (2018)

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Q. Lin, B. He, and M. Xiao, Entangling Two Macroscopic Me - chanical Resonators at High Temperature, Phys. Rev. Applie d 13, 034030 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Kotler, G

    S. Kotler, G. A. Peterson, E. Shojaee, F. Lecocq, K. Cica k, A. 10 Kwiatkowski, S. Geller, S. Glancy, E. Knill, R. W. Simmonds, J. Aumentado, and J. D. Teufel, Direct observation of determin- istic macroscopic entanglement, Science 372, 622 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    L. M. de L´ epinay, C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Quantum mechanics? free subsystem with me- chanical oscillators, Science 372, 625 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Y . F. Jiao, Y . L. Zuo, Y . Wang, W. Lu, J. Q. Liao, L. M. Kuang, and H. Jing, Tripartite Quantum Entanglement with Squeezed Optomechanics, Laser & Photonics Reviews 18, 2301154 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Carmon, H

    T. Carmon, H. Rokhsari, L. Yang, T. J. Kippenberg, and K. J. V ahala, Temporal behavior of radiation-pressure-inducedvibra- tions of an optical microcavity phonon mode, Phys. Rev. Lett . 94, 223902 (2005)

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Rokhsari, T

    H. Rokhsari, T. J. Kippenberg, T. Carmon and K. J. V a- hala, Radiation-pressure-driven micro-mechanical oscil lator, Opt. Express 13, 5293 (2005)

    work page 2005

  54. [54]

    Carmon, H

    T. Carmon, H. Rokhsari, L. Yang, T. J. Kippenberg, and K. J. V ahala, Temporal Behavior of Radiation-Pressure-Induced Vi- brations of an Optical Microcavity Phonon Mode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 223902 (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [55]

    T. J. Kippenberg, H. Rokhsari, T. Carmon, A. Scherer, an d K. J. V ahala, Analysis of Radiation-Pressure Induced Mechani - cal Oscillation of an Optical Microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 033901 (2005)

    work page 2005

  56. [56]

    Metzger, M

    C. Metzger, M. Ludwig, C. Neuenhahn, A. Ortlieb, I. Fave ro, K. Karrai, and F. Marquardt, Self-Induced Oscillations in a n Optomechanical System Driven by Bolometric Backaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 133903 (2008)

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    Zaitsev, A

    S. Zaitsev, A. K. Pandey, O. Shtempluck, and E. Buks, For ced and self-excited oscillations of an optomechanical cavity , Phys. Rev. E 84, 046605 (2011)

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    J. B. Khurgin, M. W. Pruessner, T. H. Stievater, and W. S. Rabi- novich, Optically pumped coherent mechanical oscillators : the laser rate equation theory and experimental verification, N ew J. Phys. 14, 105022 (2012)

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    M. Poot, K. Y . Fong, M. Bagheri, W. H. P . Pernice, and H. X. Tang, Backaction limits on self-sustained optomechanic al oscillations, Phys. Rev. A 86, 053826 (2012)

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    Suchoi, L

    O. Suchoi, L. Ella, O. Shtempluk, and E. Buks, Intermitt ency in an optomechanical cavity near a subcritical Hopf bifurcation, Phys. Rev. A 90, 033818 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    Gao, F.-C

    M. Gao, F.-C. Lei, C.-G. Du, and G.-L. Long, Self-sustai ned oscillation and dynamical multistability of optomechanical sys- tems in the extremely-large-amplitude regime, Phys. Rev. A 91, 013833 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    C. Wurl, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, Symmetry-breakin g oscillations in membrane optomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 94, 063860 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Q. Lin, B. He, and M. Xiao, Catastrophic transition betw een dy- namical patterns in a phonon laser, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, L03201 8 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Christou, V

    S. Christou, V . Kovanis, A. E. Giannakopoulos, and Y . Kominis, Parametric control of self-sustained and selfmodulated optome- chanical oscillations, Phys. Rev. A 103, 053513 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Zhang, V

    H. Zhang, V . Eremeev, J. Wu, M. Orszag, and B. He, Scal- ing behaviors in optomechanically induced nonlinear oscil la- tion, Phys. Rev. E 111, 014208 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    J. L. Zhang, M. Orszag, M. Xiao, X. S. Jiang, Q. Lin, and B. He, Highly Correlated Optomechanical Oscillations Manifested by an Anomalous Stabilization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 103602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Q. Lin, Y . Wu, G. Li, and B. He, Nonlinear optomechanical res- onance entering a self-organized energy transfer pattern, Chaos Soliton. Fract. 173, 113624 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    B. He, Q. Lin, M. Orszag, and M. Xiao, Mechanical oscilla tions frozen on discrete levels by two optical driving ?elds, Phys. Rev. A 102, 011503(R) (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [69]

    Y . Wu, G. Li, B. He, and Q. Lin, Amplitude and phase lockin g of mechanical oscillation driven by radiation pressure, Ph ys. Rev. A 105, 013521 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [70]

    G. Li, Y . Wu, Y . L. Zhang, B. He and Q. Lin, Ultra-high res- olution mass sensing based on an optomechanical nonlineari ty, Opt. Express, 30, 15858 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    J. W. Zheng, J. L. Zhang, Y . Z. Li, L. J. Mart´ ınez, B. He, a nd Q. Lin, Nonlinear optomechanically induced frequency lock - ing and its application to room temperature mass sensing, Op t. Express, 33, 31988 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    Z. F. Yan, B. He and Q. Lin, Optomechanical force sensor o per- ating over wide detection range, Opt. Express 31, 16535 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Z. F. Yan, B. He and Q. Lin, Force sensing with an optome- chanical system at room temperature, Phys. Rev. A 107, 013529 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    C. W. Gardiner and P . Zoller, Quantum Noise (Springer V erlag, 2000)

    work page 2000

  75. [75]

    Sheng, X

    J. Sheng, X. Wei, C. Yang, and H. Wu, Self-Organized Syn- chronization of Phonon Lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 053604 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    X. Li, K. Qi, Y . Wu, X. Wu, M. Hu, Z. Li, Y . He, S. Ding, Z. Xie, H. Zhou, B. He, M. Xiao, and X. Jiang, Generation of 2/3- octave-spanning visible Kerr soliton microcomb, Adv. Phot on. 7, 056002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  77. [77]

    Q. Shi, J. Tian, S. Ding, Y . Wang, S. Lei, M. Zhang, W. Wan, X. Ji, B. He, M. Xiao, and X. Jiang, On-chip ultra-high-Q opti - cal microresonators approaching the material absorption l imit, Photonics Res. 13, 2409 (2025)

    work page 2025