pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00745 · v2 · pith:D5EX6VCGnew · submitted 2026-05-01 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum simulation of nanographenes and Trotter error cancellation

Andreas Juul Bay-Smidt , Nina Glaser , Marcel D. Fabian , Earl T. Campbell , Nick S. Blunt , Gemma C. Solomon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 18:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum simulationTrotter errornanographenesenergy gapsquantum phase estimationPariser-Parr-Pople modelfault-tolerant quantum computing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Trotter error cancels for energy differences in nanographene simulations, cutting circuit depth by an order of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to establish that Trotterized quantum simulations of nanographene pi-systems exhibit a strong error cancellation when the target is an energy difference between low-lying states rather than an absolute energy. A sympathetic reader would care because this makes the quantum phase estimation step for chemically relevant quantities require far fewer gates, narrowing the gap between current hardware and useful molecular simulations. The authors support the claim with a tensor-network method that computes eigenvalue errors for systems too large for exact diagonalization and then translate the reduced error into concrete resource counts for the Pariser-Parr-Pople model. They conclude that gaps to chemical accuracy in systems of up to 140 spin orbitals stay below 3.2 times 10 to the 7 Toffoli gates.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Trotter error on energy differences between low-lying eigenstates is substantially smaller than the Trotter error on absolute energies. This cancellation produces an approximately ten-fold reduction in the circuit depth needed to reach chemical accuracy with quantum phase estimation. For two-dimensional nanographenes described by the Pariser-Parr-Pople Hamiltonian the resulting gate count for gaps up to 140 spin orbitals remains under 3.2 times 10 to the 7 Toffoli gates.

What carries the argument

Trotter product formulas whose eigenvalue errors are extracted by a tensor-network spectral analysis that scales beyond brute-force diagonalization.

If this is right

  • Energy-gap calculations for nanographenes up to 140 spin orbitals fit within 3.2 times 10 to the 7 Toffoli gates to chemical accuracy.
  • Focusing on differences rather than absolute energies removes roughly an order of magnitude from the depth required for quantum phase estimation.
  • The same error-cancellation pattern appears across worst-case, average-case and eigenvalue error measures for the product formulas examined.
  • Resource estimates for practical chemical applications become substantially more favorable once only energy differences are targeted.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same cancellation might appear in other pi-conjugated molecules, allowing similar depth savings outside the nanographene family.
  • Algorithm designers could systematically prioritize gap calculations over total-energy targets when mapping chemistry problems to early fault-tolerant hardware.
  • Extending the tensor-network error analysis to different Hamiltonians or to higher-lying states would test how general the observed cancellation is.

Load-bearing premise

The tensor-network calculation correctly predicts how Trotter errors behave for systems larger than those that can be checked exactly.

What would settle it

An exact diagonalization or small-scale quantum run on a nanographene in which the observed Trotter error on an energy gap is comparable to or larger than the error on the absolute energies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00745 by Andreas Juul Bay-Smidt, Earl T. Campbell, Gemma C. Solomon, Marcel D. Fabian, Nick S. Blunt, Nina Glaser.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Illustration of quantities of interest of nanographenes that we consider in this paper. This includes energy gaps view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of 1) worst-case, 2) average-case, 3) energy and 4) gap error constants, for view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparison of worst-case ( view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Worst-case, average-case and (ground-state) en view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Exact and effective energies and energy gaps of (a), (b), (c) 5-acene and (d), (e), (f) 2-rhombene, (g), (h) 2-triangulene view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Plot of the magnitude and direction sensitive Trotter view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. T gate and logical qubit resource estimates of (a) view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Toffoli gate and logical qubit resource estimates for view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Spectral norms (worst-case) and normalized Frobenius norms (avg-case) of the nested commutators [[ view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Worst- and average-case Trotter errors from the decomposition of the kinetic energy operator of (a) acenes, b) view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Energy error constant calculations of (a) benzene, (b) 2-acene, (c) 3-acene, (d) 4-acene, (e) 5-acene, (f) 6-acene, view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Energy error constant calculations of (a) 2-rhombene and (b) 3-rhombene eigenstates using our TD-DMRG method view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Energy error constant calculations of (a) 2-triangulene and (b) 3-triangulene eigenstates using our TD-DMRG method view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Exact energies, effective energies, exact energy gaps and effective energy gaps of (a), (b), (c) 3-acene, (d), (e), (f) view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Fault-tolerant quantum computing is a promising tool for simulating molecules and materials, but frequently-considered applications require substantial resources, and the gap between hardware capabilities and requirements remains significant. We propose quantum simulation of nanographene $\pi$-systems as relevant and scalable problems to span the gap between early and large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computing. We examine the efficiency of Trotterized quantum simulation, present a detailed analysis of worst-case, average-case and energy eigenvalue Trotter errors, and show that these Trotter error estimates vary by orders of magnitude. Trotter eigenvalue errors are obtained from a novel tensor-network-based approach which allows spectral analysis of product formulas for systems beyond brute-force calculation. Notably, we observe a Trotter error cancellation phenomenon whereby the Trotter error for energy differences between low-lying eigenstates is significantly smaller than the Trotter error for absolute energies, resulting in approximately an order of magnitude circuit depth reduction for quantum phase estimation calculation of energy gaps. This is a significant result because for most chemical applications, only energy differences are of practical relevance. We estimate that calculation of energy gaps to chemical accuracy between the ground- and excited-states within the Pariser--Parr--Pople model for large 2D nanographenes (up to 140 spin orbitals) requires circuits with $< 3.2 \times 10^7$ Toffoli gates. This work shows that considering details of chemically-relevant applications and exploiting error cancellation can lead to substantial reductions in resource requirements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes nanographene π-electron systems (modeled by the Pariser–Parr–Pople Hamiltonian) as a scalable testbed for fault-tolerant quantum simulation. It presents a multi-regime analysis of Trotter errors (worst-case, average-case, and eigenvalue-specific) and introduces a tensor-network method to extract the spectrum of the effective Hamiltonian generated by product formulas for system sizes beyond exact diagonalization. The central observation is a cancellation phenomenon in which Trotter errors for energy gaps between low-lying eigenstates are substantially smaller than those for absolute energies, yielding an approximately order-of-magnitude reduction in circuit depth for quantum phase estimation of gaps. Resource estimates indicate that chemical-accuracy gap calculations for nanographenes up to 140 spin orbitals require fewer than 3.2 × 10^7 Toffoli gates.

Significance. If the reported error cancellation is quantitatively reliable, the work supplies a concrete, application-driven route to resource reduction for chemically relevant observables (energy differences) rather than absolute energies. The tensor-network spectral analysis constitutes a methodological advance that extends Trotter-error diagnostics to system sizes inaccessible to brute-force methods, and the explicit Toffoli-count estimates provide falsifiable targets for future hardware demonstrations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Tensor-network spectral analysis section (and resource-estimate paragraphs)] The quantitative claim of an order-of-magnitude circuit-depth reduction for gap QPE (and the associated <3.2 × 10^7 Toffoli bound for 140-orbital systems) rests entirely on Trotter eigenvalue errors extracted via the tensor-network method for all sizes larger than those amenable to exact diagonalization. No independent cross-validation (e.g., comparison against exact spectra or alternative approximation schemes at intermediate sizes where both methods are feasible) is reported; any systematic bias in bond-dimension truncation that affects the resolution of near-degenerate eigenvalues or the absolute-versus-gap error difference would directly scale the reported cancellation factor.
  2. [Methods and results on tensor-network Trotter eigenvalue estimates] The manuscript states that the tensor-network approach “allows spectral analysis … for systems beyond brute-force calculation,” yet provides no quantitative error metric (e.g., fidelity to exact eigenvalues or convergence with bond dimension) for the largest systems used to generate the headline resource numbers. This omission leaves the central cancellation result without an internal consistency check at the scale where the practical claim is made.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Methods] The abstract and main text should explicitly state the bond-dimension cutoff and truncation tolerance employed in the tensor-network calculations so that readers can assess the resolution of the reported eigenvalue differences.
  2. [Figures presenting Trotter error data] Figure captions and axis labels for error-vs.-time-step plots should distinguish absolute-energy Trotter error from gap Trotter error on the same panel to make the cancellation phenomenon visually immediate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments on the tensor-network spectral analysis. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Tensor-network spectral analysis section (and resource-estimate paragraphs)] The quantitative claim of an order-of-magnitude circuit-depth reduction for gap QPE (and the associated <3.2 × 10^7 Toffoli bound for 140-orbital systems) rests entirely on Trotter eigenvalue errors extracted via the tensor-network method for all sizes larger than those amenable to exact diagonalization. No independent cross-validation (e.g., comparison against exact spectra or alternative approximation schemes at intermediate sizes where both methods are feasible) is reported; any systematic bias in bond-dimension truncation that affects the resolution of near-degenerate eigenvalues or the absolute-versus-gap error difference would directly scale the reported cancellation factor.

    Authors: We thank the referee for emphasizing the need for cross-validation. The manuscript does report that the tensor-network method reproduces exact-diagonalization results for small systems (where both are feasible), and the Trotter-error cancellation for gaps is already visible in those comparisons. To make this explicit, the revised manuscript will include a new subsection with direct comparisons at intermediate sizes (approximately 20–40 orbitals), showing agreement between tensor-network and exact spectra for both absolute energies and gaps, together with the dependence on bond dimension. These additions will quantify any truncation effects on the reported cancellation factor. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods and results on tensor-network Trotter eigenvalue estimates] The manuscript states that the tensor-network approach “allows spectral analysis … for systems beyond brute-force calculation,” yet provides no quantitative error metric (e.g., fidelity to exact eigenvalues or convergence with bond dimension) for the largest systems used to generate the headline resource numbers. This omission leaves the central cancellation result without an internal consistency check at the scale where the practical claim is made.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative error metrics for the largest systems would improve the internal consistency of the resource estimates. In the calculations underlying the <3.2 × 10^7 Toffoli bound, bond dimensions were increased until the low-lying eigenvalues (ground and first excited state) converged to better than 10^{-4} Hartree. The revised manuscript will add a paragraph and accompanying table or figure that reports the bond dimensions employed for the key system sizes, the observed eigenvalue variation with bond dimension, and the resulting uncertainty in the Trotter-error differences. This will furnish the requested consistency check at the scale of the headline claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses novel tensor-network spectral analysis

full rationale

The paper's central result—the observed Trotter error cancellation for energy gaps and the resulting resource estimates for nanographenes up to 140 orbitals—follows from applying a new tensor-network method to compute eigenvalue errors of product formulas on the Pariser-Parr-Pople Hamiltonian. This is a direct computational output rather than a self-definitional loop, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. Standard Trotterization and quantum phase estimation provide independent grounding, and the tensor-network approach is presented as an external tool for systems beyond exact diagonalization without reducing the claimed cancellation to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard quantum mechanics and Trotter approximation theory plus the domain choice of the Pariser-Parr-Pople model; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The Trotter product formula provides a valid approximation to time evolution whose error can be bounded and analyzed spectrally.
    Invoked throughout the analysis of worst-case, average-case, and eigenvalue Trotter errors.
  • domain assumption The Pariser-Parr-Pople model is an adequate effective Hamiltonian for the pi-systems of the nanographenes under study.
    Used to generate the resource estimates for systems up to 140 spin orbitals.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5814 in / 1448 out tokens · 50606 ms · 2026-05-19T18:08:16.780540+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We examine the efficiency of Trotterized quantum simulation, present a detailed analysis of worst-case, average-case and energy eigenvalue Trotter errors... Trotter eigenvalue errors are obtained from a novel tensor-network-based approach

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev.136, B864 (1964)

    work page 1964

  2. [2]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations in- cluding exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965)

    work page 1965

  3. [3]

    A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-S´ anchez, and W. Yang, Insights into current limitations of density functional theory, Science 321, 792 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Burke, Perspective on density functional theory, J

    K. Burke, Perspective on density functional theory, J. Chem. Phys.136, 150901 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Mardirossian and M

    N. Mardirossian and M. Head-Gordon, Thirty years of density functional theory in computational chemistry: an overview and extensive assessment of 200 density func- tionals, Mol. Phys.115, 2315 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs, and G. Ra- jagopal, Quantum monte carlo simulations of solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 33 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Becca and S

    F. Becca and S. Sorella,Quantum Monte Carlo Ap- proaches for Correlated Systems(Cambridge University Press, 2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992)

    work page 1992

  9. [9]

    Olivares-Amaya, W

    R. Olivares-Amaya, W. Hu, N. Nakatani, S. Sharma, J. Yang, and G. K.-L. Chan, The ab-initio density ma- trix renormalization group in practice, J. Chem. Phys 142, 034102 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Helgaker, T

    T. Helgaker, T. A. Ruden, P. Jørgensen, J. Olsen, and W. Klopper, A priori calculation of molecular properties to chemical accuracy, J. Phys. Org. Chem.17, 913 (2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    Scemama, A

    A. Scemama, A. Benali, D. Jacquemin, M. Caffarel, and P.-F. Loos, Excitation energies from diffusion monte carlo using selected configuration interaction nodes, J. Chem. Phys.149, 034108 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Discretization error cancellation in electronic structure calculation: a quantitative study

    E. Canc` es and G. Dusson, Discretization error cancel- lation in electronic structure calculation: a quantitative study (2017), arXiv:1701.04643 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    McArdle, S

    S. McArdle, S. Endo, A. Aspuru-Guzik, S. C. Benjamin, and X. Yuan, Quantum computational chemistry, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 015003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    D. S. Abrams and S. Lloyd, Simulation of many-body fermi systems on a universal quantum computer, Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2586 (1997)

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    Kassal, S

    I. Kassal, S. P. Jordan, P. J. Love, M. Mohseni, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Polynomial-time quantum algorithm for the simulation of chemical dynamics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA105, 18681 (2008)

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    H. F. Trotter, On the product of semi-groups of opera- tors, Proc. Am. Math. Soc.10, 545 (1959)

    work page 1959

  17. [17]

    Suzuki, General theory of fractal path integrals with applications to many-body theories and statistical physics, J

    M. Suzuki, General theory of fractal path integrals with applications to many-body theories and statistical physics, J. Math. Phys32, 400 (1991)

    work page 1991

  18. [18]

    Lloyd,Science, Tech

    S. Lloyd,Science, Tech. Rep. (1996)

    work page 1996

  19. [19]

    A. M. Childs, Y. Su, M. C. Tran, N. Wiebe, and S. Zhu, Theory of Trotter Error with Commutator Scaling, Phys. Rev. X11, 011020 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Q. Zhao, Y. Zhou, A. F. Shaw, T. Li, and A. M. Childs, Hamiltonian simulation with random inputs, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 270502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Q. Zhao, Y. Zhou, and A. M. Childs, Entanglement accel- erates quantum simulation, Nat. Phys.21, 1338 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    S ¸ahino˘ glu and R

    B. S ¸ahino˘ glu and R. D. Somma, Hamiltonian simulation in the low-energy subspace, npj Quantum Inf.7, 119 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    G¨ unther, F

    J. G¨ unther, F. Witteveen, A. Schmidhuber, M. Miller, M. Christandl, and A. Harrow, Phase estimation with partially randomized time evolution (2025), arXiv:2503.05647 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Reiher, N

    M. Reiher, N. Wiebe, K. M. Svore, D. Wecker, and M. Troyer, Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA114, 7555 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Yi and E

    C. Yi and E. Crosson, Spectral analysis of product for- mulas for quantum simulation, npj Quantum Inf.8, 37 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    E. T. Campbell, Early fault-tolerant simulations of the hubbard model, Quantum Sci. Technol.7, 015007 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    A. J. Bay-Smidt, F. R. Klausen, C. S¨ underhauf, R. Izs´ ak, G. C. Solomon, and N. S. Blunt, Fault-tolerant quantum simulation of generalized hubbard models, PRX Quan- tum6, 030348 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Kan and B

    A. Kan and B. C. B. Symons, Resource-optimized fault- tolerant simulation of the fermi-hubbard model and high- temperature superconductor models, npj Quantum Inf. 14 11, 138 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Toshio, Y

    R. Toshio, Y. Akahoshi, J. Fujisaki, H. Oshima, S. Sato, and K. Fujii, Practical quantum advantage on partially fault-tolerant quantum computer, Phys. Rev. X15, 021057 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Akahoshi, R

    Y. Akahoshi, R. Toshio, J. Fujisaki, H. Oshima, S. Sato, and K. Fujii, Compilation of trotter-based time evolution for partially fault-tolerant quantum computing architec- ture, PRX Quantum6, 040319 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Chung, A

    M.-Z. Chung, A. H. Z. Kavaki, A. Scherer, A. Khalid, X. Kong, T. Kawakubo, N. Anand, G. A. Dagnew, Z. Webb, A. Silva, G. Gyawali, T. Yan, K. Fujii, A. Ho, M. Mohseni, P. Ronagh, and J. Martinis, Partially fault- tolerant quantum computation for megaquop applica- tions (2026), arXiv:2603.13093 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    Clar, The aromatic sextet, inMobile Source Emissions Including Policyclic Organic Species, edited by D

    E. Clar, The aromatic sextet, inMobile Source Emissions Including Policyclic Organic Species, edited by D. Ron- dia, M. Cooke, and R. K. Haroz (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1983) pp. 49–58

    work page 1983

  33. [33]

    C. H. Suresh and S. R. Gadre, Clar’s aromatic sextet theory revisited via molecular electrostatic potential to- pography, J. Org. Chem.64, 2505 (1999)

    work page 1999

  34. [34]

    Y. Gu, Z. Qiu, and K. M¨ ullen, Nanographenes and graphene nanoribbons as multitalents of present and fu- ture materials science, J. Am. Chem. Soc.144, 11499 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    M. D. Fabian, N. Glaser, and G. C. Solomon, The ppp model – a minimum viable parametrisation of conjugated chemistry for modern computing applications, Digit. Dis- cov.5, 482 (2026)

    work page 2026

  36. [36]

    I. D. Kivlichan, C. Gidney, D. W. Berry, N. Wiebe, J. McClean, W. Sun, Z. Jiang, N. Rubin, A. Fowler, A. Aspuru-Guzik, H. Neven, and R. Babbush, Improved fault-tolerant quantum simulation of condensed-phase correlated electrons via trotterization, Quantum4, 296 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    N. S. Blunt, A. V. Ivanov, and A. J. Bay-Smidt, A monte carlo approach to bound trotter error (2025), arXiv:2510.11621 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Y. Dai, Y. Liu, K. Ding, and J. Yang, A short review of nanographenes: structures, properties and applications, Mol. Phys.116, 987 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Narita, X.-Y

    A. Narita, X.-Y. Wang, X. Feng, and K. M¨ ullen, New advances in nanographene chemistry, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 6616 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    S. Song, A. Pinar Sol´ e, A. Matˇ ej, G. Li, O. Stetsovych, D. Soler, H. Yang, M. Telychko, J. Li, M. Kumar, Q. Chen, S. Edalatmanesh, J. Brabec, L. Veis, J. Wu, P. Jelinek, and J. Lu, Highly entangled polyradical nanographene with coexisting strong correlation and topological frustration, Nat. Chem.16, 938 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Q. Du, X. Su, Y. Liu, Y. Jiang, C. Li, K. Yan, R. Ortiz, T. Frederiksen, S. Wang, and P. Yu, Orbital-symmetry ef- fects on magnetic exchange in open-shell nanographenes, Nat. Commun.14, 4802 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Zirzlmeier, D

    J. Zirzlmeier, D. Lehnherr, P. B. Coto, E. T. Chernick, R. Casillas, B. S. Basel, M. Thoss, R. R. Tykwinski, and D. M. Guldi, Singlet fission in pentacene dimers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.112, 5325 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    M¨ ullen and J

    K. M¨ ullen and J. P. Rabe, Nanographenes as active com- ponents of single-molecule electronics and how a scanning tunneling microscope puts them to work, Acc. Chem. Res 41, 511 (2008)

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    M. C. Hanna and A. J. Nozik, Solar conversion efficiency of photovoltaic and photoelectrolysis cells with carrier multiplication absorbers, J. Appl. Phys.100, 074510 (2006)

    work page 2006

  45. [45]

    M. B. Smith and J. Michl, Singlet fission, Chem. Rev. 110, 6891 (2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [46]

    P. M. Zimmerman, Z. Zhang, and C. B. Musgrave, Sin- glet fission in pentacene through multi-exciton quantum states, Nat. Chem.2, 648 (2010)

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    de Silva, Inverted Singlet–Triplet Gaps and Their Rel- evance to Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence, J

    P. de Silva, Inverted Singlet–Triplet Gaps and Their Rel- evance to Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.10, 5674 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    ´A. J. P´ erez-Jim´ enez, Y. Olivier, and J. C. Sancho-Garc´ ıa, The Role of Theoretical Calculations for INVEST Sys- tems: Complementarity Between Theory and Experi- ments and Rationalization of the Results, Adv. Optical Mater.13, 2403199 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Pollice, P

    R. Pollice, P. Friederich, C. Lavigne, G. dos Pas- sos Gomes, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, Organic molecules with inverted gaps between first excited singlet and triplet states and appreciable fluorescence rates, Matter 4, 1654 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Aizawa, Y.-J

    N. Aizawa, Y.-J. Pu, Y. Harabuchi, A. Nihonyanagi, R. Ibuka, H. Inuzuka, B. Dhara, Y. Koyama, K. ichi Nakayama, S. Maeda, F. Araoka, and D. Miyajima, De- layed fluorescence from inverted singlet and triplet ex- cited states, Nature609, 502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    A. Das, T. M¨ uller, F. Plasser, and H. Lischka, Polyradical character of triangular non-kekul´ e structures, zethrenes, p-quinodimethane-linked bisphenalenyl, and the clar goblet in comparison: An extended multireference study, J. Phys. Chem. A120, 1625 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    W. T. Borden and E. R. Davidson, Effects of electron repulsion in conjugated hydrocarbon diradicals, J. Am. Chem. Soc.99, 4587 (1977)

    work page 1977

  53. [53]

    Vilas-Varela, F

    M. Vilas-Varela, F. Romero-Lara, A. Vegliante, J. P. Calupitan, A. Mart´ ınez, L. Meyer, U. Uriarte-Amiano, N. Friedrich, D. Wang, N. E. Koval, M. E. Sandoval- Salinas, D. Casanova, M. Corso, E. Artacho, D. Pe˜ na, and J. I. Pascual, On-surface synthesis and characteri- zation of a high-spin aza-[5]-triangulene, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.62, e202307884 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Bedogni, D

    M. Bedogni, D. Giavazzi, F. D. Maiolo, and A. Painelli, Shining light on inverted singlet–triplet emitters, . Chem. Theory Comput.12, 5652 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Hachmann, J

    J. Hachmann, J. J. Dorando, M. Avil´ es, and G. K.-L. Chan, The radical character of the acenes: A density matrix renormalization group study, J. Chem. Phys.127, 134309 (2007)

    work page 2007

  56. [56]

    T. J. H. Hele, E. G. Fuemmeler, S. N. Sanders, E. Kumarasamy, M. Y. Sfeir, L. M. Campos, and N. Ananth, Anticipating acene-based chromophore spec- tra with molecular orbital arguments, J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 2527 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Pawlak, K

    R. Pawlak, K. N. Anindya, T. Shimizu, J.-C. Liu, T. Sakamaki, R. Shang, A. Rochefort, E. Nakamura, and E. Meyer, Atomically precise incorporation of bn-doped rubicene into graphene nanoribbons, J. Phys. Chem. C 126, 19726 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    J. Su, W. Fan, P. Mutombo, X. Peng, S. Song, M. Ondr´ aˇ cek, P. Golub, J. Brabec, L. Veis, M. Tely- chko, P. Jel´ ınek, J. Wu, and J. Lu, On-surface synthe- sis and characterization of [7]triangulene quantum ring, 15 Nano Lett.21, 861 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Barrag´ an, Goudappagouda, M

    A. Barrag´ an, Goudappagouda, M. Kumar, D. Soler- Polo, E. P´ erez-Elvira, A. Pinar Sol´ e, A. Garc´ ıa-Frutos, Z. Gao, K. Lauwaet, J. M. Gallego, R. Miranda, D.´Ecija, P. Jel´ ınek, A. Narita, and J. I. Urgel, Strong mag- netic exchange coupling of a dibenzo-fused rhomboidal nanographene and its homocoupling with tunable peri- odicities on a metal surfac...

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Pariser and R

    R. Pariser and R. G. Parr, A Semi-Empirical Theory of the Electronic Spectra and Electronic Structure of Com- plex Unsaturated Molecules. II, J. Chem. Phys.21, 767 (1953)

    work page 1953

  61. [61]

    J. A. Pople, Electron interaction in unsaturated hydro- carbons, Trans. Faraday Soc.49, 1375 (1953)

    work page 1953

  62. [62]

    Chakraborty and A

    H. Chakraborty and A. Shukla, Pariser–parr–pople model based investigation of ground and low-lying ex- cited states of long acenes, J. Phys. Chem. A117, 14220–14229 (2013)

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    Lambie, D

    S. Lambie, D. Kats, D. Usvyat, and A. Alavi, On the applicability of ccsd(t) for dispersion interactions in large conjugated systems, J. Chem. Phys.162, 114112 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Sony and A

    P. Sony and A. Shukla, A correlated study of linear op- tical absorption in tetracene and pentacene, Synth. Met. 155, 316 (2005)

    work page 2005

  65. [65]

    Sony and A

    P. Sony and A. Shukla, Large-scale correlated calcu- lations of linear optical absorption and low-lying ex- cited states of polyacenes: Pariser-parr-pople hamilto- nian, Phys. Rev. B75, 155208 (2007)

    work page 2007

  66. [66]

    Chiappe, E

    G. Chiappe, E. Louis, E. San-Fabi´ an, and J. A. Verg´ es, Can model Hamiltonians describe the electron– electron interaction inπ-conjugated systems?: PAH and graphene, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter27, 463001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  67. [67]

    Bhattacharyya, D

    P. Bhattacharyya, D. K. Rai, and A. Shukla, Pariser– Parr–Pople Model Based Configuration-Interaction Study of Linear Optical Absorption in Lower-Symmetry Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Molecules, J. Phys. Chem. C124, 14297 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    E. V. Bostr¨ om, A. Mikkelsen, C. Verdozzi, E. Perfetto, and G. Stefanucci, Charge separation in donor–c60 com- plexes with real-time green functions: The importance of nonlocal correlations, Nano Lett.18, 785 (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    Sony and A

    P. Sony and A. Shukla, Large-scale correlated study of excited state absorptions in naphthalene and anthracene, J. Chem. Phys131, 014302 (2009)

    work page 2009

  70. [70]

    Loaiza and A

    I. Loaiza and A. F. Izmaylov, Block-invariant symme- try shift: Preprocessing technique for second-quantized hamiltonians to improve their decompositions to linear combination of unitaries, J. Chem. Theory Comput.19, 8201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [71]

    L. A. Mart´ ınez-Mart´ ınez, T.-C. Yen, and A. F. Izmaylov, Assessment of various Hamiltonian partitionings for the electronic structure problem on a quantum computer us- ing the Trotter approximation, Quantum7, 1086 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Suzuki, Decomposition formulas of exponential opera- tors and lie exponentials with some applications to quan- tum mechanics and statistical physics, J

    M. Suzuki, Decomposition formulas of exponential opera- tors and lie exponentials with some applications to quan- tum mechanics and statistical physics, J. Math. Phys.26, 601 (1985)

    work page 1985

  73. [73]

    H. Zhai, H. R. Larsson, S. Lee, Z.-H. Cui, T. Zhu, C. Sun, L. Peng, R. Peng, K. Liao, J. T¨ olle, J. Yang, S. Li, and G. K.-L. Chan, Block2: A comprehensive open source framework to develop and apply state-of-the-art dmrg algorithms in electronic structure and beyond, J. Chem. Phys.159, 234801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    N. S. Blunt, L. Caune, R. Izs´ ak, E. T. Campbell, and N. Holzmann, Statistical phase estimation and error mit- igation on a superconducting quantum processor, PRX Quantum4, 040341 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    G. Wang, D. S. Fran¸ ca, R. Zhang, S. Zhu, and P. D. Johnson, Quantum algorithm for ground state energy es- timation using circuit depth with exponentially improved dependence on precision, Quantum7, 1167 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    Grubb, R

    S. Grubb, R. Whetten, A. Albrecht, and E. Grant, A precise determination of the first ionization potential of benzene, Chem. Phys. Lett.108, 420 (1984)

    work page 1984

  77. [77]

    Bocharov, M

    A. Bocharov, M. Roetteler, and K. M. Svore, Efficient synthesis of universal repeat-until-success quantum cir- cuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 080502 (2015)

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    B. L. Higgins, D. W. Berry, S. D. Bartlett, H. M. Wise- man, and G. J. Pryde, Entanglement-free heisenberg- limited phase estimation, Nature450, 393 (2007)

    work page 2007

  79. [79]

    D. W. Berry, B. L. Higgins, S. D. Bartlett, M. W. Mitchell, G. J. Pryde, and H. M. Wiseman, How to per- form the most accurate possible phase measurements, Phys. Rev. A80, 052114 (2009)

    work page 2009

  80. [80]

    N. S. Blunt, G. P. Geh´ er, and A. E. Moylett, Compila- tion of a simple chemistry application to quantum error correction primitives, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013325 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.