pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.01016 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Quantum Flow algorithm: quantum simulations of chemical systems using reduced quantum resources and constant depth quantum circuits

Bhumika Jayee , Nathan M. Myers , Duo Song , Eric J. Bylaska , Karol Kowalski , Nicholas P. Bauman This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 18:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords quantum flowunitary coupled clusterquantum simulationchemical systemsdownfoldingreduced qubitsactive space
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum Flow with singles and doubles matches canonical UCCSD energies using substantially fewer qubits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces and tests the Quantum Flow algorithm for simulating chemical systems on quantum computers. It demonstrates that the QFlow-SD variant, limited to single and double excitations, produces energies closely matching those from the full canonical unitary coupled-cluster singles and doubles method across several molecules. This agreement holds while using many fewer qubits, addressing a key barrier to practical quantum chemistry simulations. The authors also show a hybrid classical-quantum downfolding strategy that further reduces the quantum resource demands, illustrated for the water molecule in a triple-zeta basis set.

Core claim

The QFlow algorithm, when implemented with the unitary coupled-cluster singles and doubles ansatz (QFlow-SD), yields molecular energies in close agreement with the canonical UCCSD framework for all tested systems. This performance is achieved with substantially reduced qubit requirements through the use of reduced active spaces. A two-step downfolding procedure, combining classical coupled-cluster methods with QFlow optimization, is shown to be effective for larger basis sets such as cc-pVTZ for water.

What carries the argument

The Quantum Flow (QFlow) framework with cost-effective unitary coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles solvers operating in downfolded active spaces.

Load-bearing premise

That the reduced active space and singles-and-doubles excitations in the downfolding procedure capture sufficient electron correlation to match canonical UCCSD without systematic errors in the systems considered.

What would settle it

Computing full configuration interaction energies for one of the tested molecules and finding a significant discrepancy with QFlow-SD results would falsify the close agreement claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01016 by Bhumika Jayee, Duo Song, Eric J. Bylaska, Karol Kowalski, Nathan M. Myers, Nicholas P. Bauman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Active space energy profiles for the QFlow calculation of H8 with 2.0 and 3.0 a.u. separations using the STO-3G basis. Eight view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Energy convergence of the ADAPT-VQE calculations of view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Energy convergence of the ADAPT-VQE calculations view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Active space energy profiles for the QFlow calculation of H view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Active space energy profiles for the QFlow calculation of H view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Active space energy profiles for the QFlow calculation of carbon (C view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We assess the performance of the Quantum Flow (QFlow) algorithm employing cost-effective solvers based on the unitary coupled-cluster ansatz with single and double excitations (QFlow-SD). The resulting energies are benchmarked against those obtained with an analogous QFlow formulation defined in the same active spaces but augmented by higher-rank excitations, including triples and quadruples (QFlow-SDTQ). Across all molecular systems considered, QFlow-SD exhibits close agreement with results from the canonical unitary coupled cluster with singles and doubles framework, while requiring substantially fewer qubits than the latter. For the water molecule in the cc-pVTZ basis, we further demonstrate the performance of a composite two-step downfolding strategy. In this approach, an initial coupled-cluster downfolding based on the double unitary coupled-cluster ansatz is followed by a QFlow treatment within the resulting target space, illustrating the effectiveness of combining classical downfolding with quantum flow optimization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the Quantum Flow (QFlow) algorithm, focusing on the QFlow-SD variant that employs a unitary coupled-cluster ansatz restricted to single and double excitations. It benchmarks QFlow-SD energies against canonical UCCSD and a higher-rank QFlow-SDTQ reference across multiple molecular systems, claiming close numerical agreement while achieving substantial qubit reductions via active-space truncation and a two-step classical-quantum downfolding procedure. For the water molecule in the cc-pVTZ basis, the paper demonstrates a composite strategy that first applies coupled-cluster downfolding followed by QFlow optimization in the target space.

Significance. If the reported numerical agreement holds under the tested conditions, the work provides a concrete demonstration of qubit-resource reduction for quantum chemical simulations by integrating active-space methods, downfolding, and variational quantum optimization. The direct comparisons to canonical UCCSD and the inclusion of a higher-rank reference (QFlow-SDTQ) strengthen the validation; the two-step downfolding example for water further illustrates hybrid classical-quantum workflows that could extend applicability on near-term hardware.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states 'close agreement' and 'substantially fewer qubits' without quantifying the energy deviations or qubit counts; adding a sentence with representative numerical values (e.g., maximum deviation in mHartree and qubit reduction factor for water/cc-pVTZ) would improve clarity for readers.
  2. Section describing the two-step downfolding procedure (water/cc-pVTZ example) would benefit from an explicit statement of the final active-space size after the classical downfolding step and the corresponding circuit depth achieved in the QFlow stage.
  3. The manuscript should include a table or figure summarizing all tested molecules, basis sets, active-space sizes, and the observed energy differences versus canonical UCCSD to make the 'across all molecular systems' claim immediately verifiable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of the QFlow-SD results, and recommendation for minor revision. The recognition of the qubit reductions, numerical agreement with UCCSD, and the hybrid downfolding example for water is appreciated. We address the referee's summary below and will incorporate any minor editorial improvements in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The manuscript presents the Quantum Flow (QFlow) algorithm, focusing on the QFlow-SD variant that employs a unitary coupled-cluster ansatz restricted to single and double excitations. It benchmarks QFlow-SD energies against canonical UCCSD and a higher-rank QFlow-SDTQ reference across multiple molecular systems, claiming close numerical agreement while achieving substantial qubit reductions via active-space truncation and a two-step classical-quantum downfolding procedure. For the water molecule in the cc-pVTZ basis, the paper demonstrates a composite strategy that first applies coupled-cluster downfolding followed by QFlow optimization in the target space.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's concise and accurate summary of the work. The QFlow-SD ansatz is indeed restricted to singles and doubles within the chosen active spaces, and the benchmarks confirm close agreement with canonical UCCSD energies while using fewer qubits. The two-step downfolding for water (classical CC downfolding followed by QFlow in the target space) is presented as a concrete illustration of the hybrid workflow. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain consists of standard active-space truncation, unitary coupled-cluster ansatz application, and a two-step classical-quantum downfolding procedure, all benchmarked directly against independent canonical UCCSD energies and a higher-rank QFlow-SDTQ reference. These comparisons are numerical and external to the QFlow-SD implementation itself; no equations define the target energies in terms of the algorithm's outputs, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz is imported via self-citation. The qubit reduction follows mechanically from the truncation and mapping steps without circular redefinition of the reported agreement.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method implicitly assumes the UCCSD ansatz remains accurate in reduced spaces and that classical downfolding preserves the target physics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1037 out tokens · 33246 ms · 2026-05-09T18:04:40.964997+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 299 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. M. Mniszewski and P. A. Dub and S. Tretiak and P. M. Anisimov and Y. Zhang and C. F. A. Negre , journal =. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83561-x , title =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83561-x

  2. [2]

    Bauman, N. P. and Bylaska, E. J. and Krishnamoorthy, S. and Low, G. H. and Wiebe, N. and Granade, C. E. and Roetteler, M. and Troyer, M. and Kowalski, K. , title =. J. Chem. Phys. , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Quantum Inf

    Venegas-Andraca, S.E. , journal =. doi:10.1007/s11128-012-0432-5 , title =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11128-012-0432-5

  4. [4]

    ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing , volume=

    Quantum linear system solver based on time-optimal adiabatic quantum computing and quantum approximate optimization algorithm , author=. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Kempe , title =

    J. Kempe , title =. Contemp. Phys. , volume =. 2003 , publisher =

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    & Wigner, E

    Jordan, P. and Wigner, E. , journal =. doi:10.1007/BF01331938 , title =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01331938

  7. [7]

    2002 , doi =

    Fermionic Quantum Computation , journal =. 2002 , doi =

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    and Sofia, S

    Tranter, A. and Sofia, S. and Seeley, J. and Kaicher, M. and McClean, J. and Babbush, R. and Coveney, P. V. and Mintert, F. and Wilhelm, F. and Love, P. J. , title =. Int. J. Quantum Chem. , volume =. doi:10.1002/qua.24969 , year =

    work page doi:10.1002/qua.24969

  9. [9]

    and Jones, V

    Aharonov, D. and Jones, V. and Landau, Z. , journal =. doi:10.1007/s00453-008-9168-0 , title =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00453-008-9168-0

  10. [10]

    npj Quant Mater , author =

    Vasiliev, A. and Volkova, O. and Zvereva, E. and Markina, M. , journal =. doi:10.1038/s41535-018-0090-7 , title =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-018-0090-7

  11. [11]

    F. H. L. Essler and M. Fagotti , title =. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2016/06/064002 , year = 2016, publisher =

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2016/06/064002 2016

  12. [12]

    Abanin, D. A. and Papi\'. Recent progress in many-body localization , journal =. doi:10.1002/andp.201700169 , year =

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.201700169

  13. [13]

    and Huse, D

    Nandkishore, R. and Huse, D. A. , title =. Ann. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    and Izaac, J

    Stokes, J. and Izaac, J. and Killoran, N. and Carleo, G. , journal =. doi:10.22331/q-2020-05-25-269 , title =

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2020-05-25-269 2020

  15. [15]

    2013 , journal=

    Quantum Geometric Tensor (Fubini-Study Metric) in Simple Quantum System: A pedagogical Introduction , author=. 2013 , journal=

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Neural Comput

    S. Neural Comput. , title=. 1998 , volume=

    work page 1998

  17. [18]

    Cauchy and the gradient method , volume=

    Lema\'. Cauchy and the gradient method , volume=. 2012 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0305004100016108 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100016108 2012

  18. [19]

    Wave Mechanics: Advanced General Theory , author=

    work page

  19. [20]

    A. D. McLachlan , title =. Mol. Phys. , volume =. 1964 , publisher =

    work page 1964

  20. [21]

    Geometry of the Time-Dependent Variational Principle in Quantum Mechanics

    The time-dependent variational principle (TDVP). Geometry of the Time-Dependent Variational Principle in Quantum Mechanics. 1981. doi:10.1007/3-540-10579-4_20

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-10579-4_20 1981

  21. [22]

    1988 , issn =

    On the equivalence of time-dependent variational principles , journal =. 1988 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(88)80380-4 , author =

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(88)80380-4 1988

  22. [23]

    2019 , journal=

    On the natural gradient for variational quantum eigensolver , author=. 2019 , journal=

    work page 2019

  23. [24]

    doi:10.22331/q-2019-10-07-191 , url =

    Yuan, X. and Endo, S. and Zhao, Q. and Li, Y. and Benjamin, S. C. , journal =. doi:10.22331/q-2019-10-07-191 , title =

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2019-10-07-191 2019

  24. [25]

    Hybrid quantum-classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and determination of excited states , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2017 , month =

    work page 2017

  25. [26]

    Quantum Computation of Electronic Transitions Using a Variational Quantum Eigensolver , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2019 , month =

    work page 2019

  26. [27]

    Subspace-search variational quantum eigensolver for excited states , author =. Phys. Rev. Research , volume =. 2019 , month =

    work page 2019

  27. [28]

    Orbital Entanglement in Bond-Formation Processes

    Boguslawski, Katharina and Tecmer, Paweł and Barcza, Gergely and Legeza, \". Orbital Entanglement in Bond-Formation Processes , volume =. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , publisher =. 2013 , month = jun, pages =. doi:10.1021/ct400247p , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/ct400247p 2013

  28. [29]

    2021 , journal=

    Predicting ground state, excited states and long-time evolution of many-body systems from short-time evolution on a quantum computer , author=. 2021 , journal=

    work page 2021

  29. [30]

    General nonperturbative estimate of the energy density of lattice Hamiltonians , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1994 , month =

    work page 1994

  30. [31]

    E. A. Representations and bounds for zeros of orthogonal polynomials and eigenvalues of sign-symmetric tri-diagonal matrices , journal =. 1987 , doi =

    work page 1987

  31. [32]

    Bound on the extreme zeros of orthogonal polynomials , author =. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , volume =. 1992 , doi =

    work page 1992

  32. [33]

    Analytic solution for the ground-state energy of the extensive many-body problem , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 1996 , month =

    work page 1996

  33. [34]

    Plaquette expansion in lattice Hamiltonian models , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1993 , month =

    work page 1993

  34. [35]

    Plaquette expansion proof and interpretation , author =. Z. Phys. B , volume=

    work page

  35. [36]

    Piecewise moments method: Generalized Lanczos technique for nuclear response surfaces , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2005 , month =

    work page 2005

  36. [37]

    2021 , journal=

    Experimental quantum state measurement with classical shadows , author=. 2021 , journal=

    work page 2021

  37. [38]

    Efficient Estimation of Pauli Observables by Derandomization , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2021 , month =

    work page 2021

  38. [39]

    2021 , journal=

    Decision Diagrams for Quantum Measurements with Shallow Circuits , author=. 2021 , journal=

    work page 2021

  39. [40]

    2020 , journal=

    Measurements of Quantum Hamiltonians with Locally-Biased Classical Shadows , author=. 2020 , journal=

    work page 2020

  40. [41]

    2021 , journal=

    Adaptive Pauli Shadows for Energy Estimation , author=. 2021 , journal=

    work page 2021

  41. [42]

    2021 , journal=

    Informationally complete POVM-based shadow tomography , author=. 2021 , journal=

    work page 2021

  42. [43]

    Fermionic Partial Tomography via Classical Shadows , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2021 , month =

    work page 2021

  43. [44]

    2021 , journal=

    Robust shadow estimation , author=. 2021 , journal=

    work page 2021

  44. [45]

    Shadow tomography of quantum states (2018)

    Aaronson, Scott , title =. 2018 , publisher =. doi:10.1145/3188745.3188802 , booktitle =

    work page doi:10.1145/3188745.3188802 2018

  45. [46]

    PRX Quantum , volume =

    Experimental Estimation of Quantum State Properties from Classical Shadows , author =. PRX Quantum , volume =. 2021 , month =

    work page 2021

  46. [47]

    2019 , journal=

    A diagrammatic approach to variational quantum ansatz construction , author=. 2019 , journal=

    work page 2019

  47. [48]

    Nearly Optimal Measurement Scheduling for Partial Tomography of Quantum States , author =. Phys. Rev. X , volume =. 2020 , month =

    work page 2020

  48. [49]

    Aaronson and A

    S. Aaronson and A. Arkhipov , title=. 2011 , pages =

    work page 2011

  49. [50]

    Quantum simulation , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2014 , month =

    work page 2014

  50. [51]

    Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements , author =. Nat. Phys. , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    work page 2020

  51. [52]

    Quantum simulation , author =. Nat. Phys. , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    work page 2012

  52. [53]

    Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes , author =. Nat. Commun. , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    work page 2018

  53. [54]

    Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits , author =. Nat. Commun. , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    work page 2021

  54. [55]

    doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abf51a , year = 2021, month =

    M Cerezo and Patrick J Coles , title =. doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abf51a , year = 2021, month =

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abf51a 2058

  55. [56]

    2021 , journal=

    Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) algorithms , author=. 2021 , journal=

    work page 2021

  56. [57]

    Adiabatic quantum computation , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2018 , month =

    work page 2018

  57. [58]

    Scalable Quantum Simulation of Molecular Energies , author =. Phys. Rev. X , volume =. 2016 , month =

    work page 2016

  58. [59]

    and Chuang, Isaac L

    Nielsen, Michael A. and Chuang, Isaac L. , title =. 2011 , isbn =

    work page 2011

  59. [60]

    Cloud Quantum Computing of an Atomic Nucleus , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2018 , month =

    work page 2018

  60. [61]

    Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2018 , month =

    work page 2018

  61. [62]

    npj Quantum Inf

    Quantum chemistry as a benchmark for near-term quantum computers , author =. npj Quantum Inf. , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    work page 2019

  62. [63]

    Linke, N. M. and Maslov, D. and Roetteler, M. and Debnath, S. and Figgatt, C. and Landsman, K. A. and Wright, K. and Monroe, C. , title =. 2017 , doi =

    work page 2017

  63. [64]

    2014 , journal=

    A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm , author=. 2014 , journal=

    work page 2014

  64. [65]

    Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond

    Preskill, J. , journal =. doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 , title =

    work page Pith review doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 2018

  65. [66]

    Methodology for replacing indirect measurements with direct measurements , author =. Phys. Rev. Research , volume =. 2019 , month =

    work page 2019

  66. [67]

    Richardson, L. F. and Gaunt, J. A. , title =. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character , volume =. 1927 , doi =

    work page 1927

  67. [68]

    Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180509 , url =

    work page Pith review doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180509 2017

  68. [69]

    Simulating Hamiltonian Dynamics with a Truncated Taylor Series , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2015 , month =

    work page 2015

  69. [70]

    Variational quantum computation of excited states

    Higgott, Oscar and Wang, Daochen and Brierley, Stephen , journal =. doi:10.22331/q-2019-07-01-156 , title =

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2019-07-01-156 2019

  70. [71]

    Direct Estimations of Linear and Nonlinear Functionals of a Quantum State , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2002 , month =

    work page 2002

  71. [72]

    Optimal Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , month =

    work page 2017

  72. [73]

    Now Foundations and Trends

    Sachdeva, S. and Vishnoi, N. K. , title=. 2014 , publisher="Now Foundations and Trends", doi=

    work page 2014

  73. [74]

    Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation,

    Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation , author =. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. 2002. doi:10.1090/conm/305/05215

    work page doi:10.1090/conm/305/05215 2002

  74. [75]

    Childs, A. M. and Kothari, R. and Somma, R. D. , title =. SIAM Journal on Computing , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    work page 2017

  75. [76]

    On the product of semi-groups of operators , author =. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , volume =. 1959 , doi =

    work page 1959

  76. [77]

    1990 , doi =

    Fractal decomposition of exponential operators with applications to many-body theories and Monte Carlo simulations , journal =. 1990 , doi =

    work page 1990

  77. [78]

    Progress towards practical quantum variational algorithms , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2015 , month =

    work page 2015

  78. [79]

    Application of fermionic marginal constraints to hybrid quantum algorithms , author=. New J. Phys. , volume=. 2018 , month=

    work page 2018

  79. [80]

    2020 , eprint=

    Identifying challenges towards practical quantum advantage through resource estimation: the measurement roadblock in the variational quantum eigensolver , author=. 2020 , eprint=

    work page 2020

  80. [81]

    and R \"o tteler, M

    Klappenecker, A. and R \"o tteler, M. Constructions of Mutually Unbiased Bases. Finite Fields and Applications. 2004

    work page 2004

Showing first 80 references.