pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03021 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Closing the knowledge gap in semileptonic Brightarrow X_cellν decays

Florian Herren , Raynette van Tonder This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex
keywords semileptonic B decaysexclusive branching fractionsinclusive rateDs mesonsbaryonic final statescharm transitionsB to Xc l nu
0
0 comments X

The pith

The unmeasured part of the semileptonic B to charm decay rate is dominated by final states that contain no D mesons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compiles all available exclusive measurements of semileptonic B decays that produce charm mesons and compares their sum to the well-measured inclusive rate. By folding in experimental ratios of branching fractions relative to the semi-inclusive B to D X lepton neutrino modes, the authors show that the remaining gap is carried almost entirely by decays that produce no D meson at all. This points to large contributions from baryonic final states and from Ds mesons as the most plausible way to close the difference. The work also supplies simplified models for two marginal channels, B to D eta lepton neutrino and B to Ds K lepton neutrino, and lists specific final states that future searches could target.

Core claim

When the measured exclusive semileptonic branching fractions are supplemented by the available ratios to semi-inclusive B to D X lepton neutrino decays, the unmeasured fraction of the total inclusive B to Xc lepton neutrino rate is shown to arise predominantly from final states that contain no D meson, indicating substantial roles for baryonic modes and Ds mesons.

What carries the argument

Branching-fraction ratios measured relative to the semi-inclusive B to D X lepton neutrino final states, used to infer the composition of the unmeasured exclusive components.

Load-bearing premise

The published measurements of branching fractions relative to semi-inclusive D-containing modes give an unbiased picture of what the unmeasured exclusive decays actually contain.

What would settle it

A new measurement that finds the unmeasured components are instead dominated by additional D-meson final states would directly contradict the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03021 by Florian Herren, Raynette van Tonder.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The size of the separate semileptonic gap components view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Fit of the measured view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Predicted lineshapes of the view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spectrum of non-strange charm mesons relative view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work we summarize the current status of measured exclusive semileptonic branching fractions containing charm mesons. We use the available experimental data to evaluate the difference between the sum of exclusive measurements and the inclusive determination. By including experimental results of branching fractions relative to semi-inclusive $B\rightarrow D X\ell\nu$ decays, we demonstrate that the unmeasured components of the total branching fraction are dominated by final states devoid of $D$ mesons, hinting towards sizeable contributions from baryonic final states and $D_s$ mesons. Based on the obtained fractions, we discuss candidates that could potentially close the remaining difference and propose searches for promising final states. Furthermore, we provide simplified models for S-wave $B\rightarrow D\eta\ell\nu$ and $B\rightarrow D_s K\ell\nu$ decays that contribute marginally to the unmeasured components of the total inclusive rate.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript summarizes the current status of measured exclusive semileptonic B→Xcℓν branching fractions involving charm mesons. It evaluates the difference between the sum of these exclusive measurements and the inclusive rate. By incorporating experimental results on branching fractions relative to semi-inclusive B→DXℓν decays, the authors conclude that the unmeasured components are dominated by final states without D mesons, suggesting sizeable contributions from baryonic final states and Ds mesons. The paper discusses candidate modes to close the gap, proposes searches for promising final states, and provides simplified models for S-wave B→Dηℓν and B→DsKℓν decays.

Significance. If the central inference holds after addressing the data-handling details, the work is useful for the field as it identifies likely sources for the inclusive-exclusive discrepancy in semileptonic B decays and directs attention to baryonic and Ds channels that have received less experimental focus. The provision of simplified models for marginal S-wave contributions is a constructive addition for phenomenology. The approach of leveraging existing relative branching-fraction data is a strength when the inputs are robustly treated.

major comments (1)
  1. [section discussing inclusion of relative branching fractions to semi-inclusive B→DXℓν] The demonstration that unmeasured components are dominated by final states devoid of D mesons (and the subsequent hint at baryonic and Ds contributions) rests on the use of experimental branching fractions relative to semi-inclusive B→DXℓν decays. The manuscript provides no details on data selection criteria, systematic uncertainty treatment, potential reconstruction biases, or a quantitative breakdown of the dominance calculation, which is load-bearing for the subtraction that isolates the non-D fraction.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that the models 'contribute marginally'; a short quantitative estimate of their size relative to the gap would improve clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the constructive assessment of its significance. We address the major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of the analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [section discussing inclusion of relative branching fractions to semi-inclusive B→DXℓν] The demonstration that unmeasured components are dominated by final states devoid of D mesons (and the subsequent hint at baryonic and Ds contributions) rests on the use of experimental branching fractions relative to semi-inclusive B→DXℓν decays. The manuscript provides no details on data selection criteria, systematic uncertainty treatment, potential reconstruction biases, or a quantitative breakdown of the dominance calculation, which is load-bearing for the subtraction that isolates the non-D fraction.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from greater transparency on the treatment of the relative branching-fraction inputs. These measurements originate from published BaBar and Belle analyses that employ inclusive reconstruction of the D meson to define the semi-inclusive B→DXℓν reference sample, thereby minimizing certain reconstruction biases. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated paragraph (or short subsection) that summarizes the principal data-selection criteria, the dominant systematic uncertainties, and the approach to bias control as reported in the original experimental papers, with explicit citations. We will also provide an explicit quantitative breakdown of the subtraction procedure, including the numerical values of the measured relative fractions, the resulting non-D component, and the propagated uncertainties. These additions will render the isolation of the non-D fraction fully reproducible without changing the central conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: central inference uses external experimental branching-fraction data without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper's derivation consists of summing published exclusive B→Xcℓν branching fractions, subtracting from the inclusive rate, and incorporating independent experimental measurements of branching fractions relative to the semi-inclusive B→DXℓν normalization to isolate the non-D fraction. This subtraction and inference step draws directly on external data rather than any internal fit, self-defined quantity, or prior self-citation that would force the result by construction. No equations reduce the claimed non-D dominance to a fitted parameter or ansatz introduced within the paper itself, and no uniqueness theorem or renaming of known results is invoked to close the argument. The analysis therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis is data-driven from published experimental results; the abstract introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The simplified models for S-wave decays may rest on standard assumptions but are not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5448 in / 1184 out tokens · 29113 ms · 2026-05-08T17:45:36.801371+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    cocktail

    Sequential decays of the form D∗∗→D′∗∗(→ D(∗)π)π. This case also includes a component from theD∗tail, a fraction of which will contribute to the Dππchannel due to the D∗πmodes. Furthermore, Belle reported a preference for a dominant S-wave Dπcomponent in D1(2420)→Dππdecays [34]. In this case, the measured D(∗)π+π−modes account for 4/9 of the totalD (∗)ππc...

    work page

  2. [2]

    CP Violation and the CKM Matrix: Assessing the Impact of the Asymmetric B Factories

    J. Charles, A. Hocker, H. Lacker, S. Laplace, F. R. Le Diberder, J. Malcles, J. Ocariz, M. Pivk, and L. Roos (CKMfitter Group), Eur. Phys. J. C41, 1 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0406184

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Averages of $b$-hadron, $c$-hadron, and $\tau$-lepton properties as of 2023

    S. Banerjeeet al.(Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFLAV)), Phys. Rev. D113, 012008 (2026), arXiv:2411.18639 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Lincei Sci

    M. Bonaet al.(UTfit), Rend. Lincei Sci. Fis. Nat.34, 37 (2023), arXiv:2212.03894 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    van Tonderet al.(Belle), Phys

    R. van Tonderet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D104, 112011 (2021), arXiv:2109.01685 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Caoet al.(Belle), Phys

    L. Caoet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D104, 012008 (2021), arXiv:2102.00020 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Abumusabhet al.(Belle-II), Phys

    M. Abumusabhet al.(Belle-II), Phys. Rev. D113, 032004 (2026), arXiv:2512.08056 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Aaijet al.,Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions R(D∗)andR(D 0) , Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 111802 (2023), arXiv:2302.02886 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Test of lepton flavor universality usingB 0→D∗−τ +ντ decays with hadronicτchannels, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys. Rev. D108, 012018 (2023), arXiv:2305.01463 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Adachiet al.,First measurement of R(Xτ /ℓ)as an inclusive test of the b→cτ ν anomaly, Phys

    I. Adachiet al.(Belle-II), Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 211804 (2024), arXiv:2311.07248 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Adachiet al.,Test of lepton flavor universality with a measurement of R(D∗)using hadronic B tagging at the Belle II experiment, Phys

    I. Adachiet al.(Belle-II), Phys. Rev. D110, 072020 (2024), arXiv:2401.02840 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Adachiet al.(Belle-II), Test of lepton flavor univer- sality with measurements ofR(D +) andR(D ∗+) using semileptonic B tagging at the Belle II experiment, Phys

    I. Adachiet al.(Belle-II), Phys. Rev. D112, 032010 (2025), arXiv:2504.11220 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Measurement of b hadron production fractions in 7 TeV pp collisions

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys. Rev. D85, 032008 (2012), arXiv:1111.2357 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Aaij et al., Measurement of b-hadron fractions in 13 TeV pp collisions, Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys. Rev. D100, 031102 (2019), arXiv:1902.06794 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Extracting production fractions of $b$ hadrons from exclusive semi-leptonic decays

    C. Bolognani, M. Jung, M. Reboud, and K. Keri Vos, (2026), arXiv:2605.00181 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    E. J. Gustafson, F. Herren, R. S. Van de Water, R. van Tonder, and M. L. Wagman, Phys. Rev. D110, L091502 (2024), arXiv:2311.00864 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    M.-L. Du, M. Albaladejo, P. Fern´ andez-Soler, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, J. Nieves, and D.-L. Yao, Phys. Rev. D98, 094018 (2018), arXiv:1712.07957 [hep- ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    F. U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, and S. Turczyk, Phys. Rev. D85, 094033 (2012), arXiv:1202.1834 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    Becirevic, A

    D. Becirevic, A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, J.-C. Raynal, P. Roudeau, and J. Serrano, Phys. Rev. D87, 054007 (2013), arXiv:1206.5869 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  21. [21]

    Meieret al.(Belle), Phys

    F. Meieret al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D107, 092003 (2023), arXiv:2211.09833 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    J. P. Leeset al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 041801 (2016), arXiv:1507.08303 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Le Yaouanc, J.-P

    A. Le Yaouanc, J.-P. Leroy, and P. Roudeau, Phys. Rev. D99, 073010 (2019), arXiv:1806.09853 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    Le Yaouanc, J.-P

    A. Le Yaouanc, J.-P. Leroy, and P. Roudeau, Phys. Rev. D105, 013004 (2022), arXiv:2102.11608 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    M. L. Du, F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, F. Herren, B. Kubis, and R. van Tonder, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1289 (2025), arXiv:2509.12133 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    A Measurement of the Branching Fractions of exclusive Bbar -> D(*)(pi)l-nubar Decays in Events with a Fully Reconstructed B Meson

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 151802 (2008), arXiv:0712.3503 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  27. [27]

    del Amo Sanchezet al.(BaBar), Phys

    P. del Amo Sanchezet al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 041804 (2011), arXiv:1012.4158 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2011

  28. [28]

    Stypulaet al.(Belle), Phys

    J. Stypulaet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D86, 072007 (2012), arXiv:1207.6244 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2012

  29. [29]

    Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. D76, 051101 (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0703027

    work page arXiv 2007

  30. [30]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys. Rev. D99, 092009 (2019), arXiv:1807.10722 [hep-ex]. 14

    work page arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Finauri and P

    G. Finauri and P. Gambino, JHEP02, 206 (2024), arXiv:2310.20324 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    L¨ uck,Determination of the CKM-matrix element|Vub| from the electron energy spectrum measured in inclu- sive B→Xueνdecay with the BABAR detector, Ph.D

    T. L¨ uck,Determination of the CKM-matrix element|Vub| from the electron energy spectrum measured in inclu- sive B→Xueνdecay with the BABAR detector, Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-Universit¨ at zu Berlin, Mathematisch- Naturwissenschaftliche Fakult¨ at I (2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    F. U. Bernlochner and Z. Ligeti, Phys. Rev. D95, 014022 (2017), arXiv:1606.09300 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Rudolph, Int

    M. Rudolph, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33, 1850176 (2018), arXiv:1805.05659 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Abeet al.(Belle), Phys

    K. Abeet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 221805 (2005), arXiv:hep-ex/0410091

    work page arXiv 2005

  36. [36]

    Statistics and Computing 29(5), 891 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11222-018-9844-0

    E. Higson, W. Handley, M. Hobson, and A. Lasenby, Stat. Comput.29, 891 (2018), arXiv:1704.03459 [stat.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    J. S. Speagle, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.493, 3132 (2020), arXiv:1904.02180 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    van Dyket al.(EOS Authors), Eur

    D. van Dyket al.(EOS Authors), Eur. Phys. J. C82, 569 (2022), arXiv:2111.15428 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    EOS version 1.10.19,

    D. van Dyket al.(EOS Authors), “EOS version 1.10.19,” (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Albrechtet al.(ARGUS), Z

    H. Albrechtet al.(ARGUS), Z. Phys. C60, 11 (1993)

    work page 1993

  41. [41]

    J. P. Leeset al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. D85, 011102 (2012), arXiv:1110.6005 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2012

  42. [42]

    Herren, B

    F. Herren, B. Kubis, and R. van Tonder, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014037 (2025), arXiv:2502.20960 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    L. Liu, K. Orginos, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. D87, 014508 (2013), arXiv:1208.4535 [hep-lat]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    Von Hippel and C

    F. Von Hippel and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D5, 624 (1972)

    work page 1972

  45. [45]

    G. P. Lepage, B. Clark, C. T. H. Davies, K. Horn- bostel, P. B. Mackenzie, C. Morningstar, and H. Trottier (HPQCD), Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.106, 12 (2002), arXiv:hep-lat/0110175

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  46. [46]

    Hornbostel, G

    K. Hornbostel, G. P. Lepage, C. T. H. Davies, R. J. Dowdall, H. Na, and J. Shigemitsu, Phys. Rev. D85, 031504 (2012), arXiv:1111.1363 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2012

  47. [47]

    Bazavovet al., Semileptonic form factors forB → D∗ℓν at nonzero recoil from2 + 1-flavor lattice QCD: Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations, Eur

    A. Bazavovet al.(Fermilab Lattice, MILC, Fermilab Lat- tice, MILC), Eur. Phys. J. C82, 1141 (2022), [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C83, 21 (2023)], arXiv:2105.14019 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Liventsevet al.(Belle), Phys

    D. Liventsevet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D77, 091503 (2008), arXiv:0711.3252 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2008

  49. [49]

    Albaladejo, P

    M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, F.-K. Guo, and J. Nieves, Phys. Lett. B767, 465 (2017), arXiv:1610.06727 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Meißner, Two-pole structures in QCD: Facts, not fantasy! , Symmetry 12 (2020) 981 [2005.06909]

    U.-G. Meißner, Symmetry12, 981 (2020), arXiv:2005.06909 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), JHEP03, 146 (2020), arXiv:1911.08187 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), JHEP03, 146 (2020), arXiv:1911.08187 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Gabyshevet al.(Belle), Phys

    N. Gabyshevet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 242001 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0409005

    work page arXiv 2006

  53. [53]

    Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. D78, 112003 (2008), arXiv:0807.4974 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2008

  54. [54]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), JHEP08, 132 (2024), arXiv:2405.12688 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), JHEP08, 132 (2024), arXiv:2405.12688 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Amplitude analysis of $B^{-} \to D^{+} \pi^{-} \pi^{-}$ decays

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys. Rev. D94, 072001 (2016), arXiv:1608.01289 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys

    R. Aaijet al.(LHCb), Phys. Rev. D101, 032005 (2020), arXiv:1911.05957 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    Properties of Excited Charm and Charm-Strange Mesons

    S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Phys. Rev. D93, 034035 (2016), arXiv:1510.08305 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    Measurement of the Decay B- --> D*0 e- nubar

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 231803 (2008), arXiv:0712.3493 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  59. [59]

    Determination of the Form Factors for the Decay B0 -> D*- l+ nu_l and of the CKM Matrix Element |V_cb|

    B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. D77, 032002 (2008), arXiv:0705.4008 [hep-ex]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  60. [60]

    Abdesselam et al

    E. Waheedet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D100, 052007 (2019), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 103, 079901 (2021)], arXiv:1809.03290 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    M. T. Primet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D108, 012002 (2023), arXiv:2301.07529 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Adachiet al., Determination of |Vcb| using B¯0→D*+ℓ−ν¯ℓ decays with Belle II, Phys

    I. Adachiet al.(Belle-II), Phys. Rev. D108, 092013 (2023), arXiv:2310.01170 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    A. F. Falk and M. E. Luke, Phys. Lett. B292, 119 (1992), arXiv:hep-ph/9206241

    work page Pith review arXiv 1992

  64. [64]

    Adlarsonet al.(WASA-at-COSY), Phys

    P. Adlarsonet al.(WASA-at-COSY), Phys. Lett. B770, 418 (2017), arXiv:1610.02187 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2017

  65. [65]

    Strangeness-changing scalar form factors

    M. Jamin, J. A. Oller, and A. Pich, Nucl. Phys. B622, 279 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0110193

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  66. [66]

    K. J. Tienet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. D89, 011101 (2014), arXiv:1306.3353 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Bonviciniet al.(CLEO), Phys

    G. Bonviciniet al.(CLEO), Phys. Rev. D57, 6604 (1998), arXiv:hep-ex/9712008

    work page arXiv 1998

  68. [68]

    D. J. Lange, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462, 152 (2001)

    work page 2001

  69. [69]

    On the simulated kinematic distributions of heavy meson decays

    F. Herren and R. van Tonder, (2026), arXiv:2602.18378 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    Abumusabhet al.(Belle-II), Observation of the radia- tive decayD s(2317)+ →D ∗ s γ, (2025), arXiv:2510.27174 [hep-ex]

    M. Abumusabhet al.(Belle-II), (2025), arXiv:2510.27174 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Averyet al.(CLEO), Phys

    P. Averyet al.(CLEO), Phys. Lett. B331, 236 (1994), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 342, 453–453 (1995)], arXiv:hep- ph/9403359

    work page arXiv 1994

  72. [72]

    F. U. Bernlochner, D. Biedermann, H. Lacker, and T. L¨ uck, Eur. Phys. J. C74, 2914 (2014), arXiv:1402.2849 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  73. [73]

    $\bar B\to D^{(*)}\ell\bar \nu$ Branching Ratios and Evidence for Isospin Breaking in $\Upsilon(4S)$ Decays

    M. Jung and S. Schacht, (2026), arXiv:2604.08391 [hep- ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  74. [74]

    D’Agostini, Nucl

    G. D’Agostini, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A346, 306 (1994)

    work page 1994

  75. [75]

    De Cian, N

    M. De Cian, N. Feliks, M. Rotondo, and K. Keri Vos, JHEP06, 158 (2024), arXiv:2312.05147 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024