pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05885 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Unraveling the Origin of Ferrimagnetic Signatures in (Fe,Mn,Ga)2O3 Bixbyites: The Role of Structurally-Undetectable Spinel Impurities

Evgeniya Moshkina , Yuriy Knyazev , Ekaterina Smorodina , Oleg Bayukov , Maxim Molokeev , Evgeniy Khramov , Andrey Kartashev , Ruslan Batulin
show 7 more authors
Mikhail Cherosov Dmitriy Velikanov Evgeniy Eremin Mikhail Rautskii Dieter Kokh Mikhail Platunov Leonard Bezmaternykh
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords bixbyiteferrimagnetismspinel impuritymagnetic propertiesFe2-xMnxO3Mossbauer spectroscopyspin glasssolid solutions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Apparent room-temperature ferrimagnetism in (Fe,Mn,Ga)2O3 bixbyites comes from trace spinel impurities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the magnetic properties of Fe2-xMnxO3:Ga bixbyite solid solutions and a gallium-free reference using EDX, XRD, XAS, magnetometry, Mossbauer spectroscopy, and ESR. Low-temperature anomalies align more with spin-glass-like freezing than conventional long-range antiferromagnetic ordering. Variations in composition and synthesis cooling rate affect the observed behavior but fail to explain conflicting literature reports on magnetic ordering and transition temperatures. The room-temperature ferrimagnetic signatures in one sample are extrinsic, arising from a trace spinel-type impurity phase below standard XRD detection limits, as shown by matching magnetization curves and ESR data. Discrepancies across studies thus trace mainly to differences in chemical purity and the synthesis technique employed.

Core claim

The authors establish that the cubic Fe2-xMnxO3:Ga bixbyites exhibit low-temperature spin-glass-like freezing rather than long-range antiferromagnetic order. The apparent room-temperature ferrimagnetism observed in one sample is most likely extrinsic and can be attributed to a trace spinel-type impurity phase, as supported by magnetizations and ESR measurements. Variations in magnetic behavior depend on composition and cooling rate during synthesis, yet these factors do not account for the drastically different properties reported for similar bixbyite-type oxides. The origin of discrepancies lies primarily in the chemical purity of the samples and the synthesis technique.

What carries the argument

Trace spinel-type impurity phases below XRD detection limits, which generate the room-temperature ferrimagnetic signals detected through magnetization curves and ESR spectra while the main bixbyite phase remains structurally pure.

Load-bearing premise

The observed magnetic signals are produced by a trace spinel impurity below XRD detection limits and no other intrinsic or synthesis-related factors account for the reported discrepancies in magnetic ordering.

What would settle it

Observation of room-temperature ferrimagnetism in a bixbyite sample whose complete absence of spinel phase is confirmed by neutron diffraction or high-resolution TEM would falsify the extrinsic-impurity claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05885 by Andrey Kartashev, Dieter Kokh, Dmitriy Velikanov, Ekaterina Smorodina, Evgeniya Moshkina, Evgeniy Eremin, Evgeniy Khramov, Leonard Bezmaternykh, Maxim Molokeev, Mikhail Cherosov, Mikhail Platunov, Mikhail Rautskii, Oleg Bayukov, Ruslan Batulin, Yuriy Knyazev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fe2-xMnxO3 structure. The bixbyites have Ia3 space group, the unit cell contains two formula units and two nonequivalent octahedral positions occupied by transitional metals. Purple and green spheres – M1 and M2 metal positions, respectively (M1, M2 = Mn, Fe); red spheres – oxygen. At low temperatures, with TN ≈ 30–40 K, a magnetic phase transition is observed in many β-Fe2-xMnxO3 bixbyites, commonly descr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Temperature dependence of the magnetic suscepti view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Field dependences of the magnetization of the s view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mossbauer spectra of the studied samples measured view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: XANES spectra of the (Mn, Fe, Ga)2O3 triple oxides (S1, S2 and S3 samples) at the Mn (a), Fe (b) and Ga (c) K-edges. The spectra are presented along with the reference material spectra (MnO, Mn2O3 and MnO2 for the Mn K-edge; -Fe2O3, Fe3O4 and the Fe for the Fe K￾edge; Ga for the Ga K-edge). The Fourier transform of the Fe K-edge EXAFS spectra for all three samples exhibits four well-resolved peaks, corres… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: EXAFS spectra of the (Mn, Fe, Ga)2O3 triple oxides (samples S1, S2 and S3). Quantitative analysis and refinement of the local structure of (Mn, Fe, Ga)2O3 were performed through EXAFS spectral modeling. Due to the large number of possible cation configurations – arising from the presence of three different cations and two crystallographic sites, one of which is non-centrosymmetric – determining the precise… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Thermal dependences ∂(χ·T)/∂T(T) (a) and ∂(M 2 )/∂T(T) (b) for S1-S3 and S2 samples, respectively. The plots illustrate the actual phase transition temperatures of the low￾temperature antiferromagnetic (or spin-glass) and high-temperature ferrimagnetic phase a transitions. To gain further insight into the low-temperature anomalies, temperature-dependent specific heat measurements were performed on sets of … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Thermal dependences of specific heat of S1 (green) view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Thermal dependences of the magnetic suscep view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) ESR spectra of S2 and S3 at 400 K, the amplitude view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The cubic Fe2-xMnxO3 is an intriguing material that has recently been investigated for various applications, including lithium-ion battery anodes, catalysts, energy storage media, humidity sensors, and photocatalysts. Despite its wide range of promising applications, the magnetic properties of Fe2-xMnxO3 remain controversial, with different sources reporting conflicting information regarding the type of magnetic ordering, phase transition temperature, and magnetic moment of this compound. This work presents a study of the magnetic state of three Fe2-xMnxO3:Ga solid solutions with varying Mn:Fe:Ga ratios, along with one gallium-free Fe2-xMnxO3 reference sample. We performed a detailed analysis of the actual chemical composition and crystal structure of the synthesized samples using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) to evaluate compositional differences. The magnetic states of the three Fe2-xMnxO3:Ga samples and the gallium-free Fe2-xMnxO3 were investigated using magnetometry and Mossbauer spectroscopy. The low-temperature magnetic anomalies were found to be more consistent with spin-glass-like freezing than with conventional long-range antiferromagnetic ordering. Although variations in magnetic behavior were observed and found to depend on composition and the cooling rate during synthesis, our results demonstrate that these factors do not account for the drastically different magnetic properties reported for similar bixbyite-type oxides. Instead, the apparent room-temperature ferrimagnetism observed in one sample is most likely extrinsic and can be attributed to a trace spinel-type impurity phase, as supported by magnetizations and ESR measurements. Thus, the origin of these discrepancies lies primarily in the chemical purity of the samples and, to a significant extent, in the synthesis technique employed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the magnetic properties of three (Fe,Mn,Ga)2O3 bixbyite solid solutions with varying Mn:Fe:Ga ratios and one Ga-free Fe2-xMnxO3 reference. Using EDX, XRD, XAS, magnetometry, Mössbauer spectroscopy, and ESR, it finds low-temperature anomalies consistent with spin-glass-like freezing rather than long-range antiferromagnetism. Composition and cooling-rate variations do not explain literature discrepancies; instead, room-temperature ferrimagnetism in one sample is attributed to a trace, XRD-undetectable spinel impurity, as indicated by magnetization values and ESR signals. The origin of conflicting reports is thus traced to sample purity and synthesis conditions.

Significance. If the extrinsic-impurity attribution is confirmed, the work resolves longstanding controversies over magnetic ordering temperatures and moments in Fe2-xMnxO3 bixbyites, directly impacting their use in battery anodes, catalysts, and sensors. The multi-technique approach (structural, compositional, and magnetic) provides orthogonal evidence that purity issues dominate over intrinsic bixbyite magnetism, offering a practical caution for future synthesis studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [magnetic measurements and discussion of the ferrimagnetic sample] The central claim that room-temperature ferrimagnetism arises from a trace spinel impurity requires quantitative support. The observed saturation magnetization must be shown to be reproducible by a plausible impurity weight fraction (<1–2 wt% to remain below XRD detection) using literature Ms values for Mn-Fe spinels (~80–100 emu/g). No such back-of-envelope or explicit calculation appears in the magnetic-data discussion or supplementary information, leaving intrinsic alternatives (cation disorder, oxygen non-stoichiometry) viable.
  2. [results on composition dependence and low-temperature anomalies] The manuscript states that composition and cooling-rate variations do not account for the discrepancies, yet the exclusion of bixbyite-intrinsic mechanisms (e.g., specific cation distributions or defect-induced moments) rests on qualitative comparison rather than direct experimental tests or modeling. Additional data or arguments ruling these out are needed to make the impurity attribution load-bearing.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract would benefit from reporting quantitative impurity-fraction estimates, error bars on magnetic parameters, and explicit mention of the ESR g-factor or hyperfine parameters used to identify the spinel phase.
  2. [figures and experimental results] Figure captions and text should consistently distinguish between the three Ga-containing samples and the Ga-free reference when presenting magnetization curves and ESR spectra.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. These have prompted us to strengthen the quantitative support for our central claims and to expand our discussion of alternative mechanisms. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that room-temperature ferrimagnetism arises from a trace spinel impurity requires quantitative support. The observed saturation magnetization must be shown to be reproducible by a plausible impurity weight fraction (<1–2 wt% to remain below XRD detection) using literature Ms values for Mn-Fe spinels (~80–100 emu/g). No such back-of-envelope or explicit calculation appears in the magnetic-data discussion or supplementary information, leaving intrinsic alternatives (cation disorder, oxygen non-stoichiometry) viable.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit calculation would make the impurity attribution more rigorous and will add it to the revised manuscript. Using a representative Ms value of ~90 emu/g for Mn-Fe spinels from the literature, the room-temperature magnetization observed in the affected sample corresponds to an impurity fraction of approximately 0.5–1 wt%, which is well below typical XRD detection limits and consistent with the ESR signals we report. This estimate will be included in the magnetic properties section along with a short discussion of how it aligns with the overall data. We maintain that our XRD, XAS, and Mössbauer results already provide no support for significant cation disorder or oxygen non-stoichiometry, but the added calculation directly addresses the referee’s concern and further diminishes the plausibility of intrinsic alternatives. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript states that composition and cooling-rate variations do not account for the discrepancies, yet the exclusion of bixbyite-intrinsic mechanisms (e.g., specific cation distributions or defect-induced moments) rests on qualitative comparison rather than direct experimental tests or modeling. Additional data or arguments ruling these out are needed to make the impurity attribution load-bearing.

    Authors: We acknowledge that our current discussion relies on the consistency of our multi-technique characterization rather than dedicated modeling or new experiments specifically targeting cation distributions. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant section to include additional literature references showing that cation disorder or defect-induced moments in bixbyites produce low-temperature spin-glass behavior rather than room-temperature ferrimagnetism, and we will explicitly link this to the absence of such signatures in our Mössbauer and XAS data. While we cannot introduce new experimental measurements or computational modeling at this stage, the orthogonal evidence already presented (phase purity by XRD/XAS, composition by EDX, and magnetic behavior uncorrelated with synthesis variations) supports prioritizing the extrinsic impurity explanation. We believe the expanded discussion will render the attribution more robust. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental attribution of magnetic signals to undetected impurities

full rationale

The paper is an experimental materials science study relying on synthesis, compositional analysis (EDX, XRD, XAS), and magnetic characterization (magnetometry, Mossbauer spectroscopy, ESR). The central claim—that room-temperature ferrimagnetism in one sample arises from trace spinel impurity below XRD detection—is supported by direct measurement comparisons and literature values for spinel magnetizations, without any mathematical derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional equations, or load-bearing self-citations. No step reduces a result to its own inputs by construction. The derivation chain consists of empirical observations and qualitative consistency checks, which are self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities; conclusions rest on standard experimental interpretations of Mossbauer spectra and magnetic measurements in oxide materials.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard interpretation of Mossbauer spectra distinguishes spin-glass freezing from long-range antiferromagnetic order
    Invoked to reinterpret low-temperature anomalies

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5733 in / 1166 out tokens · 50039 ms · 2026-05-08T08:44:59.493421+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Polymorphous Transformations of Nanometric Iron(III) Oxide: A Review // Chem

    Libor Machala, Jirí Tucek, Radek Zboril. Polymorphous Transformations of Nanometric Iron(III) Oxide: A Review // Chem. Mater. 23 (2011) 3255–3272

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    S.; Arbab, A

    Mahmoudi, M.; Stroeve, P.; Milani, A. S.; Arbab, A. S. Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Surface Engineering, Cytotoxicity & Biomedical Applications // Nova Science Pub Inc.: U.K. (2011) 225 p

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Preparation of bixbyite phase (Mn xFe 1−x)2O3 for NTC thermistor applications // Mater

    Dipika Saha, A Das Sharma, A Sen, H.S Maiti. Preparation of bixbyite phase (Mn xFe 1−x)2O3 for NTC thermistor applications // Mater. Lett. 55 (6) (2002) 403-406

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    FeMnO 3: A High-Performance Li-Ion Battery Anode Material // Chem

    Kangzhe Cao, Huiqiao Liu, Xiaohong Xu, Yijing Wang , Lifang Jiao. FeMnO 3: A High-Performance Li-Ion Battery Anode Material // Chem. Comm. 52 (2016) 11414-11417

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Monoc rystalline FeMnO 3 on Carbon Cloth for Extremely High-Areal-Capacitance Supercapacitors // ACS Appl

    Yi-Jie Gu, Wei Wen, Shilie Zheng, Jin-Ming Wu. Monoc rystalline FeMnO 3 on Carbon Cloth for Extremely High-Areal-Capacitance Supercapacitors // ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3 (12) (2020) 11863–11872

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Vasiljevic, Milena P

    Zorka Z. Vasiljevic, Milena P. Dojcinovic, Jugoslav B. Krstic, Vesna Ribic, Nenad B. Tadic, Milos Ognjanovic, Sandrine Auger, Jasmina Vidic, Maria Vesna Nikolic. Sy nthesis and antibacterial activity of iron manganite (FeMnO 3) particles against the environmental bacterium Bacillus subtilis // RSC Adv. 10 (2020) 13879

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    A New Met hod for Synthesis of FeMnO 3 Ceramics and its Phase Transformation // J

    Zhijie Li, Shifa Wang, Bo Li, Xia Xiang. A New Met hod for Synthesis of FeMnO 3 Ceramics and its Phase Transformation // J. Nano Res. 37 (2015) 122

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Seifu, A

    D. Seifu, A. Kebede, F.W. Oliver, E. Hoffman, E. Ha mmond, C. Wynter, A. Aning, L. Takacs, I.-L. Siu, J .C. Walker, G. Tessema, M.S. Seehra. Evidence of ferrimagnetic ordering in FeMnO 3 produced by mechanical alloying // J. Magn. Magn. Mater . 212 (2000) 178-182

    work page 2000

  9. [9]

    Rayaprol, S

    S. Rayaprol, S. D. Kaushik, P. D. Babu, V. Siruguri . Structure and Magnetism of FeMnO 3 // AIP Conf. Proc. 1512 (2013) 1132-1133

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Rayaprol, S.D.Kaushik

    S. Rayaprol, S.D.Kaushik. Magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of FeMnO 3 // Ceram. Int. 41 (8) (2015) 9567-9571

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Mordvinova, Oleg I

    Debamalya Ghosh, Uma Dutta, Ariful Haque, Natalia E. Mordvinova, Oleg I. Lebedev, Kamalesh Pal, Arup Gayen, Partha Mahata, Asish K. Kundu, Md. Motin Seikh. E vidence of low temperature spin glass transition in bixbyite type FeMnO 3 // Mater. Sci. Eng. B 226 (2017) 206-210

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Rayaprol, Renan A

    S. Rayaprol, Renan A. P. Ribeiro, Kiran Singh, V. R. Reddy, S. D. Kaushik, Sergio R. de Lazaro. Experimental and theoretical interpretation of magnetic ground state of FeMnO 3 // J. Alloys Compd. 774 (2019) 290-298

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Banks, E

    E. Banks, E. Kostiner, G.K. Wertheim. Mossbauer ef fect in MnFeO 3 // J. Chem. Phys. 45 (4) (1966) 1189- 1191

    work page 1966

  14. [14]

    Ahmed, Muhhamad Naeem Ashiq, Muhammad Irfan , Muhhamad Ismail, Irshad Ali, Muhammad Azhar Khan

    Abdul Axix, E. Ahmed, Muhhamad Naeem Ashiq, Muhammad Irfan , Muhhamad Ismail, Irshad Ali, Muhammad Azhar Khan. Impact of Gd and Cu substitution on die lectric and magnetic properties of MnFeO 3 // Physica B Condens. Matter. 571 (2019) 199-203

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Rubankumar

    Laurel Simon Lobo, A. Rubankumar. Investigation on structural and electrical properties of FeMnO 3 synthesized by sol-gel method // Ionics 25 (2019) 1341–1350

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Structural, magnetic , and electrical property of nanocrystalline perovskit e structure of iron manganite (FeMnO 3) // Appl

    Gowreesan S., Ruban Kumar A. Structural, magnetic , and electrical property of nanocrystalline perovskit e structure of iron manganite (FeMnO 3) // Appl. Phys. A 123 (2017) 689

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    M., Seryotkin Yurii, Bayukov O

    Moshkina E. M., Seryotkin Yurii, Bayukov O. A., Molokeev M. S., Kokh Dieter, Smorodina Ekaterina, Krylov A. S., Bezmaternykh L. N. Flux growth and phase diver sity of the triple oxides of transition metals (Mn,Fe, Ga) 2O3 in multicomponent fluxes based on Bi 2O3–MoO 3–B2O3–Na 2O // CrystEngComm 25 (18) (2023) 2824-2834

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    User’s Manual

    Bruker AXS TOPAS V4: General profile and structure a nalysis software for powder diffraction data. User’s Manual. Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany. 2008

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Chernyshov, A.A

    A.A. Chernyshov, A.A. Veligzhanin, Y.V. Zubavichus. Structural Materials Science End-Station at the Kurchatov Synchrotron Radiation Source: Recent Instrumentation Upgrades and Experimental Results // Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Res. A 603 (2009) 95–98

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Newville

    M. Newville. IFEFFIT: interactive XAFS analysis and FEFF fitting // J. Synchrotron Radiat. 8 (2001) 322–324

    work page 2001

  21. [21]

    Ravel, M

    B. Ravel, M. Newville. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT // J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12 (2005) 537–541

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    Velikanov

    D.A. Velikanov. High-sensitivity measurements of th e magnetic properties of materials at cryogenic temperatures // Inorg. Mater. Appl. Res. 11 (4) (2020) 801–808

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Velikanov

    D.А. Velikanov. Magnetometer with a superconducting qua ntum interferometric sensor // RF patent for the invention RU 2481591 C1. Publ. 10.05.2013, Bulletin No. 13

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    V. G. Vlasenko, S. V. Zubkov, V. A. Shuvaeva, K. G. A bdulvakhidov, S. I. Shevtsova. Crystal structure and dielectric properties of aurivillius phases A 0.5 Bi 4.5 B0.5 Ti 3.5 O15 (A = Na, Ca, Sr, Pb; B = Cr, Co, Ni, Fe, Mn, Ga) // Phys. Solid State 56 (2014) 1554-1560

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    M., Molokeev M

    Moshkina E. M., Molokeev M. S., Eremin E. V., Bezm aternykh L. N. Influence of Ga-substitution to the structural and magnetic properties of (Mn,Fe) 2O3 bixbyite // Phys. Solid State 65 (6) (2023) 1009-1014

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Knyazev, A.S

    Yu.V. Knyazev, A.S. Tarasov, M.S. Platunov, A.L. Trigub, O.A. Bayukov, A.I. Boronin, L.A. Solovyov, E.V. Rabchevskii, N.N. Shishkina and A.G. Anshits. Structural and electron transport properties of CaFe2O4 synthesized in air and in helium atmosphere // J. Alloys Compd. 820 (2020) 153073

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Knyazev, Natalia V

    Yurii V. Knyazev, Natalia V. Kazak, Vyacheslav S . Zhandun, Juan Bartolomé, Ana Arauzo, Nadejda A. Belskaya, Oleg A. Bayukov, Leonard N. Bezmaternykh and Sergey G. Ovchinnikov. Electronic and magnetic states of Fe ions in Co 2FeBO 5 // Dalton Trans. 50 (2021) 9735-9745

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Structure of α-Mn 2O3, (Mn 0.983 Fe 0.017 )2O3 and (Mn 0.37 Fe 0.63 )2O3 and relation to magnetic ordering //Acta Crystallogr

    S.Geller. Structure of α-Mn 2O3, (Mn 0.983 Fe 0.017 )2O3 and (Mn 0.37 Fe 0.63 )2O3 and relation to magnetic ordering //Acta Crystallogr. B 27 (1971) 821-828

    work page 1971

  29. [29]

    Fisher, M. E. Relation between the specific heat and susceptibility of an antiferromagnet // Philos . Mag. 7(82) (1962) 1731-1743

    work page 1962

  30. [30]

    E. E. Bragg and M. S. Seehra. Magnetic Susceptibilit y of MnF, near T and Fisher's Relation // Phys. Rev. B 7 (9) (1973) 4197-4202

    work page 1973

  31. [31]

    Physics of Ferromagnetism / S.Chikazumi

    Chikazumi, S. Physics of Ferromagnetism / S.Chikazumi . – NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1997. – Chapters 15-17

    work page 1997

  32. [32]

    Sofronova, E

    S. Sofronova, E. Moshkina, D. Velikanov, E. Eremin, M.M. Syrokvashin, D.P. Pishchur, A.V. Chernyshev, T. Tislenko. Competition of anisotropies in antiferromagnetic Ni 3-xCo xB2O6 solid solutions // J. Phys. and Chem of Solids 211 (2026) 113452

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    May, Feng Ye, Bryan C

    Nikolaj Roth, Andrew F. May, Feng Ye, Bryan C. Chakoumako s, Bo Brummerstedt Iversen. Model-free reconstruction of magnetic correlation in frustrated magnets // IUCrJ 5 (4) (2018) 410-416

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    May, Bryan C

    Nikolaj Roth, Feng Ye, Andrew F. May, Bryan C. Chakoum akos, Bo Brummerstedt Iversen. Magnetic correlations and structure in bixbyite across the spin-glass transition // Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 144404

    work page 2019

  35. [35]

    Magnetic structure of bixbyite α-Mn 2O3: A combined DFT+U and neutron diffraction study // Phys

    Eric Cockayne, Igor Levin, Hui Wu, Anna Llobet. Magnetic structure of bixbyite α-Mn 2O3: A combined DFT+U and neutron diffraction study // Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013) 184413

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Robie, Bruce S

    Richard A. Robie, Bruce S. Hemingway. Low-temperatur e molar heat capacities and entropies of MnO 2 (pirolusite), Mn 3O4 (hausmanite) and Mn 2O3 (bixbyite) // J. Chem. Thermodynamics 17 (1985) 165-181

    work page 1985

  37. [37]

    Magnetism and structure of Ni 2MnBO 5 ludwigite // J

    Evgeniya Moshkina, Svetlana Sofronova, Alexey Veligzhanin, Maxim Molokeev, Ilya Nazarenko, Evgeniy Eremin, Leonard Bezmaternykh. Magnetism and structure of Ni 2MnBO 5 ludwigite // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 402 (2016) P. 69-75

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Structural and magnetic alteration of Cu 2GaBO 5 forced by Mn 3+ doping // J

    Evgeniya Moshkina, Evgeniy Eremin, Dmitriy Velikanov, A sya Bovina, Maxim Molokeev, Yurii Seryotkin, Mikhail Cherosov, Ruslan Batulin, Ivan Nemtsev, Leonard Be zmaternykh. Structural and magnetic alteration of Cu 2GaBO 5 forced by Mn 3+ doping // J. Alloys Compd. 902 (2022) 163822

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    V., Romanova O

    Udod L. V., Romanova O. B., Sitnikov M. N., Abdelbaki H. Magnetic properties and electric polarization at heterogeneous substitution in bismuth pyrostannate Bi 2(Sn 0.9 Ме 0.1 )2O7, Ме = Cr 3+ , Fe 3+ // Siberian Aerospace Journal 23 (3) (2022) 561–571

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    D. V. Azamat, A. Dejneka, J. Lancok, V. A. Trepakov , L. Jastrabik, A. G. Badalyan. Electron paramagnetic resonance studies of manganese centers in SrTiO 3: Non-Kramers Mn 3+ ions and spin-spin coupled Mn 4+ dimers // J. Appl. Phys. 111 (2012) 104119

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Belskaya, M.S

    N.A. Belskaya, M.S. Molokeev, D.A. Velikanov, A.L. Sukhachev, E.I. Pogorel’tsev, A.V. Kartashev, D. Kokh, E.V. Eremin, R.G. Batulin, M.A. Cherosov, E.M. Moshkina . Tunable magnetic properties of (Fe,Mn,Ga) 3O4 spinel solid solution // J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 642 (2026) 173900

    work page 2026

  42. [42]

    Kazak, M.S

    N.V. Kazak, M.S. Platunov, Yu.V. Knyazev, N.B. Ivanova, O.A. Bayukov, A.D. Vasiliev, L.N. Bezmaternykh, V.I. Nizhankovskii, S.Yu. Gavrilkin, K.V. Lamonova, S.G. Ovchinnikov. Uniaxial anisotropy and low-temperature antiferromagnetism of Mn 2BO 4 single crystal // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 393 (2015) 316-324

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Low-temperature magnetism of alabandite: Crucial role of surface oxidation // Am

    Jan Čuda, Tomáš Kohout, Jan Filip, Jiří Tuček, Andrei Kosterov, Jakub Haloda, Roman Skála, Eero Santala, Ivo Medřík, Radek Zbořil. Low-temperature magnetism of alabandite: Crucial role of surface oxidation // Am. Mineral. 98 (2013) 1550–1556

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Evgeniya Moshkina, Yurii Seryotkin, Asya Bovina, Maxim Molokeev, Evgeniy Eremin, Nadejda Belskaya, Leonard Bezmaternykh, Crystal formation of Cu-Mn-contai ning oxides and oxyborates in bismuth-boron fluxes diluted by MoO 3 and Na 2CO 3 // J. Cryst. Growth 503 (2018) 1–8

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Crystal growth of ReCa 3Mn 3O3(BO 3)4 (Re = Gd, Y) gaudefroyite: Phase sequence and equilibrium study in multi-component fluxes // J

    Moshkina E., Belskaya N., Bashleev Z., Molokeev M., So loviev L., Shabanova K. Crystal growth of ReCa 3Mn 3O3(BO 3)4 (Re = Gd, Y) gaudefroyite: Phase sequence and equilibrium study in multi-component fluxes // J. Cryst. Growth 600 (2022) 12691

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Svetlana Sofronova, Evgeniya Moshkina, Ilya Nazarenko , Alexey Veligzhanin, Maxim Molokeev, Evgeniy Eremin, Leonard Bezmaternykh, Chemical disorder reinforces magnetic order in ludwigite (Ni,Mn) 3BO 5 with Mn 4+ inclusion // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 465 (2018) 201-210

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Novikov, Irina Gudim

    Evgeniya Moshkina, Maxim Molokeev, Andrey Zolotov, Evge niy Eremin, Dieter Kokh, Maxim Pavlovskiy, Alexander S. Novikov, Irina Gudim. A Way to Create Mn-Con taining GdFe 3(BO 3)4 and the Dopant Effecton Its Magnetic Properties // 10.2139/ssrn.6184715 Figure S1. Thermal dependences of inverse magnetic suscept ibility of S1 (blue), S2 (black), S3 (red) and ...

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.6184715