From flat to narrow bands: Engineering quantum emission in a one-dimensional Lieb lattice

Ying Hu; Yue Sun; Zhiyong Liu

arxiv: 2605.06296 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

From flat to narrow bands: Engineering quantum emission in a one-dimensional Lieb lattice

Zhiyong Liu , Yue Sun , Ying Hu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 06:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph

keywords Lieb latticeflat bandnarrow bandquantum emissionspontaneous emissionnon-Markovian dynamicsMarkovian decaysymmetry breaking

0 comments

The pith

Controllably breaking symmetry in one-dimensional Lieb lattices turns flat bands into narrow dispersive bands, enabling tunable quantum emission from coherent trapping to Markovian decay.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a theoretical framework for quantum emission dynamics in one-dimensional Lieb lattices that connects idealized flat-band coherence with realistic narrow-band dissipation. Coupling an emitter to sublattices activates a collective size-independent interaction distinct from usual dispersive processes. Breaking lattice symmetry converts the flat band into a narrow dispersive band, creating a continuous crossover from non-Markovian to Markovian spontaneous emission controlled by the competition between interaction strength and engineered bandwidth. Explicit scaling laws are derived to provide a quantitative blueprint for tuning the emission behavior.

Core claim

By coupling an emitter to sublattices with finite flat-band wavefunction overlap, a collective size-independent interaction is activated. Controllably breaking the lattice symmetry transforms the flat band into a narrow dispersive band, enabling a continuous crossover from non-Markovian to Markovian dynamics governed by the competition between the coupling strength and the engineered bandwidth. Explicit scaling laws are derived to tune spontaneous emission from coherent trapping to Markovian decay.

What carries the argument

The competition between the collective size-independent interaction and the engineered bandwidth of the narrow dispersive band created by controlled symmetry breaking.

If this is right

Emission can be tuned continuously between coherent trapping and Markovian decay by adjusting the degree of lattice symmetry breaking.
The size-independent nature of the interaction supports scalable designs that do not degrade with larger system sizes.
The framework supplies a practical toolkit for interpreting experiments in narrow-band photonic platforms such as moiré crystals.
Scaling laws give concrete guidance for engineering desired spontaneous emission properties in structured photonic environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same symmetry-breaking approach could extend to two-dimensional or higher-dimensional lattices to achieve more complex emission control.
Connections may exist to studies of quantum many-body physics in narrow-band systems where similar bandwidth-interaction competition appears.
Direct experimental tests in photonic crystal setups could confirm the scaling laws by varying the symmetry-breaking parameter and observing the dynamics crossover.

Load-bearing premise

That breaking lattice symmetry preserves the collective size-independent interaction while introducing a controllable bandwidth that competes with it to produce a continuous crossover in emission dynamics.

What would settle it

Measuring emission coherence time or rate as a function of the symmetry-breaking parameter and verifying whether the transition follows the predicted scaling laws rather than occurring as an abrupt jump.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06296 by Ying Hu, Yue Sun, Zhiyong Liu.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Color online) Schematic, band structure, and flat view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) Spontaneous emission dynamics for an view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online) Dynamics and spectral properties for an emitter coupled to the C sublattice with view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Spontaneous emission dynamics in the modified 1D Lieb lattice with a narrow band. (a) Band structure view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) Dynamics and spectral properties for an emitter coupled to the view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) The spectral function of the narrow band under (a) view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We develop a comprehensive theoretical framework that unifies quantum emission dynamics in one-dimensional Lieb lattices, bridging the gap between ideal flat-band coherence and realistic narrow-band dissipation. By coupling an emitter to sublattices with finite flat-band wavefunction overlap, we activate a collective, size-independent interaction fundamentally distinct from dispersive-band processes. Controllably breaking lattice symmetry transforms the flat band into a narrow dispersive band, enabling a continuous crossover from non-Markovian to Markovian dynamics governed by the competition between coupling strength and engineered bandwidth. Crucially, we derive explicit scaling laws that provide a quantitative blueprint for tuning spontaneous emission from coherent trapping to Markovian decay. Our work provides a unified framework that connects idealized flat-band physics to emerging narrow-band platforms such as moir$\rm\acute{e}$ photonic crystals, offering a practical toolkit for interpreting experiments and engineering quantum emission in structured photonic environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives scaling laws for tuning quantum emission across the flat-to-narrow band crossover in a Lieb lattice, though the size-independent collective coupling needs verification in the dispersive regime.

read the letter

The paper's main contribution is a set of scaling laws that describe how to tune spontaneous emission in a 1D Lieb lattice from coherent trapping to Markovian decay. They do this by starting with flat-band collective coupling and then breaking symmetry to create a narrow dispersive band. The new part is the explicit quantitative relations that come from the competition between a size-independent collective interaction and the engineered bandwidth. Prior work on flat bands usually stayed at zero bandwidth, and dispersive cases did not start from the flat limit. Here they make the crossover continuous and controllable, and they link it to moiré photonic crystals. The framework is laid out clearly enough that a reader can see how the emitter couples to the sublattices and how the symmetry breaking is introduced. The scaling laws give a blueprint for what parameters to adjust in an experiment or simulation. The soft spot is the size independence of the collective term once the band has dispersion. In 1D tight-binding models, integrating the interaction over a dispersive band often introduces system-size dependence unless the wavefunction overlap is strictly local and the limits are taken in the right order. The paper claims the interaction stays size-independent, so the full text must show how they avoid the usual size dependence from the density of states. That step is worth checking carefully. This work is for quantum optics theorists who want to model or design emission in lattice structures with tunable bands. A reader looking for concrete scaling relations rather than general ideas would get value from it. It deserves a serious referee. The quantitative claims can be verified, and the topic is relevant to current platforms. I recommend sending it to peer review, with the limit order in the derivation as the main point to examine.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to develop a comprehensive theoretical framework unifying quantum emission dynamics in one-dimensional Lieb lattices. By coupling emitters to sublattices with finite flat-band wavefunction overlap, it activates a collective size-independent interaction. Controllably breaking lattice symmetry transforms the flat band into a narrow dispersive band, enabling a continuous crossover from non-Markovian to Markovian spontaneous emission governed by competition between the collective coupling and engineered bandwidth. Explicit scaling laws are derived to provide a quantitative blueprint for tuning emission from coherent trapping to Markovian decay, with applications to moiré photonic crystals.

Significance. If the scaling laws are rigorously derived and the size-independence of the collective interaction is preserved after symmetry breaking, the work would offer a practical toolkit for engineering quantum emission in narrow-band photonic platforms. The unification of idealized flat-band coherence with realistic narrow-band dissipation, along with explicit scaling relations, could guide experiments in structured environments.

major comments (1)

[Derivation of effective interactions and scaling laws] The central claim of explicit scaling laws for the non-Markovian to Markovian crossover rests on the collective interaction remaining size-independent after symmetry breaking. In the derivation of the effective emitter-emitter interaction (obtained by integrating over the narrow dispersive band), the manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that this interaction does not acquire implicit system-size dependence via the density of states or boundary conditions. Please show the order of limits (e.g., bandwidth to zero before thermodynamic limit) or the approximation that restores size independence, as this is load-bearing for the scaling laws and the claimed continuous crossover.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The LaTeX rendering of 'moiré' in the abstract uses an awkward construction; adopt standard accent commands for clarity.
[Results] Add a brief comparison table or plot contrasting the flat-band limit with the narrow-band case to illustrate the scaling laws visually.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Derivation of effective interactions and scaling laws] The central claim of explicit scaling laws for the non-Markovian to Markovian crossover rests on the collective interaction remaining size-independent after symmetry breaking. In the derivation of the effective emitter-emitter interaction (obtained by integrating over the narrow dispersive band), the manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that this interaction does not acquire implicit system-size dependence via the density of states or boundary conditions. Please show the order of limits (e.g., bandwidth to zero before thermodynamic limit) or the approximation that restores size independence, as this is load-bearing for the scaling laws and the claimed continuous crossover.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point regarding the order of limits. In our derivation of the effective interaction, we integrate over the narrow dispersive band after first taking the bandwidth W to zero while holding the system size finite; only subsequently is the thermodynamic limit considered. This ordering ensures that the effective coupling reduces exactly to the flat-band overlap integral, which is manifestly size-independent and free of density-of-states or boundary-induced N-dependence. The narrow-band correction appears only as a perturbative term proportional to W that does not reintroduce system-size scaling in the leading-order collective interaction. We will revise the manuscript to state this order of limits explicitly in the section on effective interactions and add a short appendix deriving the limit procedure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a theoretical framework that starts from coupling an emitter to sublattices with finite flat-band overlap to activate a collective interaction, then breaks symmetry to create a narrow dispersive band, and derives scaling laws from the resulting competition between coupling strength and bandwidth. No quoted equations or steps in the given material reduce any central claim (such as the size-independent interaction or the non-Markovian to Markovian crossover) to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain by construction. The derivation is presented as following from the lattice model assumptions and symmetry-breaking procedure without evidence of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, no concrete free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable. The framework presumably rests on standard quantum-optics master-equation assumptions and Lieb-lattice tight-binding models, but these are not enumerated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5448 in / 1043 out tokens · 129230 ms · 2026-05-08T06:15:41.333707+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

[1]

Gonz´ alez-Tudela, A

A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, A. Reiserer, J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, and F. J. Garc´ ıa-Vidal, Light-matter interactions in quantum nanophotonic devices, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 166 (2024)

work page 2024
[2]

Rivera and I

N. Rivera and I. Kaminer, Light-matter interactions with photonic quasiparticles, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 538 (2020)

work page 2020
[3]

S. Noda, M. Fujita, and T. Asano, Spontaneous-emission control by photonic crystals and nanocavities, Nat. pho- ton.1, 449 (2007)

work page 2007
[4]

selective radiance

A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential improve- ment in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. X7, 031024 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

Lodahl, S

P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 347 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

V. I. Kopp, B. Fan, H. K. M. Vithana, and A. Z. Genack, Low-threshold lasing at the edge of a photonic stop band in cholesteric liquid crystals, Opt. Lett.23, 1707 (1998)

work page 1998
[7]

Pelton, Modified spontaneous emission in nanopho- tonic structures, Nat

M. Pelton, Modified spontaneous emission in nanopho- tonic structures, Nat. Photon.9, 427 (2015)

work page 2015
[8]

Lodahl, A

P. Lodahl, A. Floris van Driel, I. S. Nikolaev, A. Irman, K. Overgaag, D. Vanmaekelbergh, and W. L. Vos, Con- trolling the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quan- tum dots by photonic crystals, Nature430, 654 (2004)

work page 2004
[9]

S. H. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, J. D. Joannopoulos, and E. F. Schubert, High extraction efficiency of spontaneous emission from slabs of photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3294 (1997)

work page 1997
[10]

Lund-Hansen, S

T. Lund-Hansen, S. Stobbe, B. Julsgaard, H. Thyrrestrup, T. S¨ unner, M. Kamp, A. Forchel, and P. Lodahl, Experimental realization of highly efficient broadband coupling of single quantum dots to a photonic crystal waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 113903 (2008)

work page 2008
[11]

A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakin- skiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electro- dynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon corre- lations, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 015002 (2023)

work page 2023
[12]

Weimann, M

S. Weimann, M. Kremer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S. Nolte, K. G. Makris, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Sza- meit, Topologically protected bound states in photonic parity-time-symmetric crystals, Nat. Mater.16, 433 (2017)

work page 2017
[13]

T. Shi, Y. H. Wu, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and J. I. Cirac, Bound states in boson impurity models, Phys. Rev. X6, 021027 (2016)

work page 2016
[14]

M. J. Hartmann, F. G. S. L. Brandao, and M. B. Ple- nio, Strongly interacting polaritons in coupled arrays of cavities, Nat. Phys.2, 849 (2006)

work page 2006
[15]

J. S. Douglas, H. Habibian, C. L. Hung, A. V. Gorshkov, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Quantum many-body models with cold atoms coupled to photonic crystals, Nat. Photon.9, 326 (2015)

work page 2015
[16]

Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C

A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C. L. Hung, D. E. Chang, J. I. Cirac, and H. J. Kimble, Subwavelength vacuum lattices and atom-atom interactions in two-dimensional photonic crystals, Nat. Photon.9, 320 (2015)

work page 2015
[17]

L. H. Frandsen, A. V. Lavrinenko, J. Fage-Pedersen, and P. I. Borel, Photonic crystal waveguides with semi-slow light and tailored dispersion properties, Opt. Express14, 9444 (2006)

work page 2006
[18]

A. B. Young, A. C. T. Thijssen, D. M. Beggs, P. An- drovitsaneas, L. Kuipers, J. G. Rarity, S. Hughes, and R. Oulton, Polarization engineering in photonic crystal waveguides for spin-photon entanglers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 153901 (2015)

work page 2015
[19]

N. F. Yu and F. Capasso, Flat optics with designer meta- 14 surfaces, Nat. Mater.13, 139 (2014)

work page 2014
[20]

A. S. Solntsev, G. S. Agarwal, and Y. S. Kivshar, Meta- surfaces for quantum photonics, Nat. Photon.15, 327 (2021)

work page 2021
[21]

Luk’Yanchuk, N

B. Luk’Yanchuk, N. I. Zheludev, S. A. Maier, N. J. Halas, P. Nordlander, H. Giessen, and C. T. Chong, The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamateri- als, Nat. Mater.9, 707 (2010)

work page 2010
[22]

Hennessy, A

K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, M. Winger, D. Gerace, M. Atat¨ ure, S. Gulde, S. F¨ alt, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Quantum nature of a strongly coupled sin- gle quantum dot–cavity system, Nature445, 896 (2007)

work page 2007
[23]

Atat¨ ure, D

M. Atat¨ ure, D. Englund, N. Vamivakas, S. Y. Lee, and J. Wrachtrup, Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Rev. Mater.3, 38 (2018)

work page 2018
[24]

Leykam, A

D. Leykam, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Artificial flat band systems: from lattice models to experiments, Adv. Phys. X3, 1473052 (2018)

work page 2018
[25]

P. W. Ren, J. R. Zheng, Z. Huang, Y. Liu, L. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. W. Ma, Z. H. Chen, J. F. Li, J. Yi,et al., Far-field excitation of a photonic flat band via a tailored anapole mode, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 083803 (2025)

work page 2025
[26]

Y. Y. Zong, S. Q. Xia, L. Q. Tang, D. H. Song, Y. Hu, Y. M. Pei, J. Su, Y. G. Li, and Z. G. Chen, Observation of localized flat-band states in Kagome photonic lattices, Opt. Express24, 8877 (2016)

work page 2016
[27]

L. Q. Tang, D. H. Song, S. Q. Xia, S. Q. Xia, J. N. Ma, W. C. Yan, Y. Hu, J. J. Xu, D. Leykam, and Z. G. Chen, Photonic flat-band lattices and unconventional light lo- calization, Nanophotonics9, 1161 (2020)

work page 2020
[28]

Mukherjee, M

S. Mukherjee, M. Di Liberto, P. ¨Ohberg, R. R. Thomson, and N. Goldman, Experimental observation of Aharonov- Bohm cages in photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 075502 (2018)

work page 2018
[29]

Mukherjee, A

S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, D. Choudhury, N. Goldman, P. ¨Ohberg, E. Andersson, and R. R. Thomson, Obser- vation of a localized flat-band state in a photonic Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 245504 (2015)

work page 2015
[30]

Flach, D

S. Flach, D. Leykam, J. D. Bodyfelt, P. Matthies, and A. S. Desyatnikov, Detangling flat bands into Fano lat- tices, EPL105, 30001 (2014)

work page 2014
[31]

Leykam, J

D. Leykam, J. D. Bodyfelt, A. S. Desyatnikov, and S. Flach, Localization of weakly disordered flat band states, Eur. Phys. J B90, 1 (2017)

work page 2017
[32]

C. Zeng, Y. R. Shi, Y. i. Mao, F. F. Wu, Y. J. Xie, T. Yuan, W. Zhang, H. N. Dai, Y. A. Chen, and J. W. Pan, Transition from flat-band localization to Anderson localization in a one-dimensional Tasaki lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 063401 (2024)

work page 2024
[33]

Pal, Nontrivial topological flat bands in a diamond- octagon lattice geometry, Phys

B. Pal, Nontrivial topological flat bands in a diamond- octagon lattice geometry, Phys. Rev. B98, 245116 (2018)

work page 2018
[34]

R. A. Vicencio, C. Cantillano, L. Morales-Inostroza, B. Real, C. Mej´ ıa-Cort´ es, S. Weimann, A. Szameit, and M. I. Molina, Observation of localized states in Lieb pho- tonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 245503 (2015)

work page 2015
[35]

Hyrk¨ as, V

M. Hyrk¨ as, V. Apaja, and M. Manninen, Many- particle dynamics of bosons and fermions in quasi-one- dimensional flat-band lattices, Phys. Rev. A87, 023614 (2013)

work page 2013
[36]

Teˇ cer, G

M. Teˇ cer, G. Calaj´ o, and M. Di Liberto, Flat band medi- ated photon-photon interactions in 2D waveguide QED networks, arXiv:2505.10623 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

A. M. Marques, D. Viedma, V. Ahufinger, and R. G. Dias, Impurity flat band states in the diamond chain, Commun. Phys.7, 387 (2024)

work page 2024
[38]

Danieli, A

C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, D. Leykam, and S. Flach, Flat band fine-tuning and its photonic applications, Nanopho- tonics13, 3925 (2024)

work page 2024
[39]

R. A. V. Poblete, Photonic flat band dynamics, Adv. Phys. X6(2021)

work page 2021
[40]

S. H. Zhang, M. Kang, H. Q. Huang, W. Jiang, X. J. Ni, L. Kang, S. P. Zhang, H. X. Xu, Z. Liu, and F. Liu, Kagome bands disguised in a coloring-triangle lattice, Phys. Rev. B99, 100404 (2019)

work page 2019
[41]

Di Liberto, S

M. Di Liberto, S. Mukherjee, and N. Goldman, Nonlinear dynamics of Aharonov-Bohm cages, Phys. Rev. A100, 043829 (2019)

work page 2019
[42]

Eyvazi, E

S. Eyvazi, E. A. Mamonov, R. Heilmann, J. Cuerda, and P. Torma, Flat-Band Lasing in Silicon Waveguide- Integrated Metasurfaces, ACS photonics12, 1570 (2025)

work page 2025
[43]

R. A. Vicencio, F. G. C´ arcamo-Macaya, D. Rom´ an- Cort´ es, and P. Solano, Observation of Non-Markovian Radiative Phenomena in Structured Photonic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 013601 (2025)

work page 2025
[44]

Di Benedetto, A

E. Di Benedetto, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and F. Ciccarello, Dipole-dipole interactions mediated by a photonic flat band, Quantum9, 1671 (2025)

work page 2025
[45]

Y. Yang, C. Roques-Carmes, S. E. Kooi, H. Tang, J. Beroz, E. Mazur, I. Kaminer, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Photonic flatband resonances for free- electron radiation, Nature613, 42 (2023)

work page 2023
[46]

Y. T. Wang, Q. H. Ye, J. Y. Yan, Y. Qiao, Y. X. Liu, Y. Z. Ye, C. Chen, X. T. Cheng, C. H. Li, Z. J. Zhang, et al., Moir´ e cavity quantum electrodynamics, Sci. Adv. 11, eadv8115 (2025)

work page 2025
[47]

K. Dong, T. C. Zhang, J. C. Li, Q. J. Wang, F. Y. Yang, Y. Rho, D. Q. Wang, C. P. Grigoropoulos, J. Q. Wu, and J. Yao, Flat bands in magic-angle bilayer photonic crystals at small twists, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 223601 (2021)

work page 2021
[48]

The computational codes that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request

work page

[1] [1]

Gonz´ alez-Tudela, A

A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, A. Reiserer, J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, and F. J. Garc´ ıa-Vidal, Light-matter interactions in quantum nanophotonic devices, Nat. Rev. Phys.6, 166 (2024)

work page 2024

[2] [2]

Rivera and I

N. Rivera and I. Kaminer, Light-matter interactions with photonic quasiparticles, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 538 (2020)

work page 2020

[3] [3]

S. Noda, M. Fujita, and T. Asano, Spontaneous-emission control by photonic crystals and nanocavities, Nat. pho- ton.1, 449 (2007)

work page 2007

[4] [4]

selective radiance

A. Asenjo-Garcia, M. Moreno-Cardoner, A. Albrecht, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Exponential improve- ment in photon storage fidelities using subradiance and “selective radiance” in atomic arrays, Phys. Rev. X7, 031024 (2017)

work page 2017

[5] [5]

Lodahl, S

P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 347 (2015)

work page 2015

[6] [6]

V. I. Kopp, B. Fan, H. K. M. Vithana, and A. Z. Genack, Low-threshold lasing at the edge of a photonic stop band in cholesteric liquid crystals, Opt. Lett.23, 1707 (1998)

work page 1998

[7] [7]

Pelton, Modified spontaneous emission in nanopho- tonic structures, Nat

M. Pelton, Modified spontaneous emission in nanopho- tonic structures, Nat. Photon.9, 427 (2015)

work page 2015

[8] [8]

Lodahl, A

P. Lodahl, A. Floris van Driel, I. S. Nikolaev, A. Irman, K. Overgaag, D. Vanmaekelbergh, and W. L. Vos, Con- trolling the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quan- tum dots by photonic crystals, Nature430, 654 (2004)

work page 2004

[9] [9]

S. H. Fan, P. R. Villeneuve, J. D. Joannopoulos, and E. F. Schubert, High extraction efficiency of spontaneous emission from slabs of photonic crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3294 (1997)

work page 1997

[10] [10]

Lund-Hansen, S

T. Lund-Hansen, S. Stobbe, B. Julsgaard, H. Thyrrestrup, T. S¨ unner, M. Kamp, A. Forchel, and P. Lodahl, Experimental realization of highly efficient broadband coupling of single quantum dots to a photonic crystal waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 113903 (2008)

work page 2008

[11] [11]

A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakin- skiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electro- dynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon corre- lations, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 015002 (2023)

work page 2023

[12] [12]

Weimann, M

S. Weimann, M. Kremer, Y. Plotnik, Y. Lumer, S. Nolte, K. G. Makris, M. Segev, M. C. Rechtsman, and A. Sza- meit, Topologically protected bound states in photonic parity-time-symmetric crystals, Nat. Mater.16, 433 (2017)

work page 2017

[13] [13]

T. Shi, Y. H. Wu, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and J. I. Cirac, Bound states in boson impurity models, Phys. Rev. X6, 021027 (2016)

work page 2016

[14] [14]

M. J. Hartmann, F. G. S. L. Brandao, and M. B. Ple- nio, Strongly interacting polaritons in coupled arrays of cavities, Nat. Phys.2, 849 (2006)

work page 2006

[15] [15]

J. S. Douglas, H. Habibian, C. L. Hung, A. V. Gorshkov, H. J. Kimble, and D. E. Chang, Quantum many-body models with cold atoms coupled to photonic crystals, Nat. Photon.9, 326 (2015)

work page 2015

[16] [16]

Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C

A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C. L. Hung, D. E. Chang, J. I. Cirac, and H. J. Kimble, Subwavelength vacuum lattices and atom-atom interactions in two-dimensional photonic crystals, Nat. Photon.9, 320 (2015)

work page 2015

[17] [17]

L. H. Frandsen, A. V. Lavrinenko, J. Fage-Pedersen, and P. I. Borel, Photonic crystal waveguides with semi-slow light and tailored dispersion properties, Opt. Express14, 9444 (2006)

work page 2006

[18] [18]

A. B. Young, A. C. T. Thijssen, D. M. Beggs, P. An- drovitsaneas, L. Kuipers, J. G. Rarity, S. Hughes, and R. Oulton, Polarization engineering in photonic crystal waveguides for spin-photon entanglers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 153901 (2015)

work page 2015

[19] [19]

N. F. Yu and F. Capasso, Flat optics with designer meta- 14 surfaces, Nat. Mater.13, 139 (2014)

work page 2014

[20] [20]

A. S. Solntsev, G. S. Agarwal, and Y. S. Kivshar, Meta- surfaces for quantum photonics, Nat. Photon.15, 327 (2021)

work page 2021

[21] [21]

Luk’Yanchuk, N

B. Luk’Yanchuk, N. I. Zheludev, S. A. Maier, N. J. Halas, P. Nordlander, H. Giessen, and C. T. Chong, The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamateri- als, Nat. Mater.9, 707 (2010)

work page 2010

[22] [22]

Hennessy, A

K. Hennessy, A. Badolato, M. Winger, D. Gerace, M. Atat¨ ure, S. Gulde, S. F¨ alt, E. L. Hu, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Quantum nature of a strongly coupled sin- gle quantum dot–cavity system, Nature445, 896 (2007)

work page 2007

[23] [23]

Atat¨ ure, D

M. Atat¨ ure, D. Englund, N. Vamivakas, S. Y. Lee, and J. Wrachtrup, Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies, Nat. Rev. Mater.3, 38 (2018)

work page 2018

[24] [24]

Leykam, A

D. Leykam, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Artificial flat band systems: from lattice models to experiments, Adv. Phys. X3, 1473052 (2018)

work page 2018

[25] [25]

P. W. Ren, J. R. Zheng, Z. Huang, Y. Liu, L. Zhang, H. Zhang, J. W. Ma, Z. H. Chen, J. F. Li, J. Yi,et al., Far-field excitation of a photonic flat band via a tailored anapole mode, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 083803 (2025)

work page 2025

[26] [26]

Y. Y. Zong, S. Q. Xia, L. Q. Tang, D. H. Song, Y. Hu, Y. M. Pei, J. Su, Y. G. Li, and Z. G. Chen, Observation of localized flat-band states in Kagome photonic lattices, Opt. Express24, 8877 (2016)

work page 2016

[27] [27]

L. Q. Tang, D. H. Song, S. Q. Xia, S. Q. Xia, J. N. Ma, W. C. Yan, Y. Hu, J. J. Xu, D. Leykam, and Z. G. Chen, Photonic flat-band lattices and unconventional light lo- calization, Nanophotonics9, 1161 (2020)

work page 2020

[28] [28]

Mukherjee, M

S. Mukherjee, M. Di Liberto, P. ¨Ohberg, R. R. Thomson, and N. Goldman, Experimental observation of Aharonov- Bohm cages in photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 075502 (2018)

work page 2018

[29] [29]

Mukherjee, A

S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, D. Choudhury, N. Goldman, P. ¨Ohberg, E. Andersson, and R. R. Thomson, Obser- vation of a localized flat-band state in a photonic Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 245504 (2015)

work page 2015

[30] [30]

Flach, D

S. Flach, D. Leykam, J. D. Bodyfelt, P. Matthies, and A. S. Desyatnikov, Detangling flat bands into Fano lat- tices, EPL105, 30001 (2014)

work page 2014

[31] [31]

Leykam, J

D. Leykam, J. D. Bodyfelt, A. S. Desyatnikov, and S. Flach, Localization of weakly disordered flat band states, Eur. Phys. J B90, 1 (2017)

work page 2017

[32] [32]

C. Zeng, Y. R. Shi, Y. i. Mao, F. F. Wu, Y. J. Xie, T. Yuan, W. Zhang, H. N. Dai, Y. A. Chen, and J. W. Pan, Transition from flat-band localization to Anderson localization in a one-dimensional Tasaki lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 063401 (2024)

work page 2024

[33] [33]

Pal, Nontrivial topological flat bands in a diamond- octagon lattice geometry, Phys

B. Pal, Nontrivial topological flat bands in a diamond- octagon lattice geometry, Phys. Rev. B98, 245116 (2018)

work page 2018

[34] [34]

R. A. Vicencio, C. Cantillano, L. Morales-Inostroza, B. Real, C. Mej´ ıa-Cort´ es, S. Weimann, A. Szameit, and M. I. Molina, Observation of localized states in Lieb pho- tonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 245503 (2015)

work page 2015

[35] [35]

Hyrk¨ as, V

M. Hyrk¨ as, V. Apaja, and M. Manninen, Many- particle dynamics of bosons and fermions in quasi-one- dimensional flat-band lattices, Phys. Rev. A87, 023614 (2013)

work page 2013

[36] [36]

Teˇ cer, G

M. Teˇ cer, G. Calaj´ o, and M. Di Liberto, Flat band medi- ated photon-photon interactions in 2D waveguide QED networks, arXiv:2505.10623 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[37] [37]

A. M. Marques, D. Viedma, V. Ahufinger, and R. G. Dias, Impurity flat band states in the diamond chain, Commun. Phys.7, 387 (2024)

work page 2024

[38] [38]

Danieli, A

C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, D. Leykam, and S. Flach, Flat band fine-tuning and its photonic applications, Nanopho- tonics13, 3925 (2024)

work page 2024

[39] [39]

R. A. V. Poblete, Photonic flat band dynamics, Adv. Phys. X6(2021)

work page 2021

[40] [40]

S. H. Zhang, M. Kang, H. Q. Huang, W. Jiang, X. J. Ni, L. Kang, S. P. Zhang, H. X. Xu, Z. Liu, and F. Liu, Kagome bands disguised in a coloring-triangle lattice, Phys. Rev. B99, 100404 (2019)

work page 2019

[41] [41]

Di Liberto, S

M. Di Liberto, S. Mukherjee, and N. Goldman, Nonlinear dynamics of Aharonov-Bohm cages, Phys. Rev. A100, 043829 (2019)

work page 2019

[42] [42]

Eyvazi, E

S. Eyvazi, E. A. Mamonov, R. Heilmann, J. Cuerda, and P. Torma, Flat-Band Lasing in Silicon Waveguide- Integrated Metasurfaces, ACS photonics12, 1570 (2025)

work page 2025

[43] [43]

R. A. Vicencio, F. G. C´ arcamo-Macaya, D. Rom´ an- Cort´ es, and P. Solano, Observation of Non-Markovian Radiative Phenomena in Structured Photonic Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 013601 (2025)

work page 2025

[44] [44]

Di Benedetto, A

E. Di Benedetto, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and F. Ciccarello, Dipole-dipole interactions mediated by a photonic flat band, Quantum9, 1671 (2025)

work page 2025

[45] [45]

Y. Yang, C. Roques-Carmes, S. E. Kooi, H. Tang, J. Beroz, E. Mazur, I. Kaminer, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Photonic flatband resonances for free- electron radiation, Nature613, 42 (2023)

work page 2023

[46] [46]

Y. T. Wang, Q. H. Ye, J. Y. Yan, Y. Qiao, Y. X. Liu, Y. Z. Ye, C. Chen, X. T. Cheng, C. H. Li, Z. J. Zhang, et al., Moir´ e cavity quantum electrodynamics, Sci. Adv. 11, eadv8115 (2025)

work page 2025

[47] [47]

K. Dong, T. C. Zhang, J. C. Li, Q. J. Wang, F. Y. Yang, Y. Rho, D. Q. Wang, C. P. Grigoropoulos, J. Q. Wu, and J. Yao, Flat bands in magic-angle bilayer photonic crystals at small twists, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 223601 (2021)

work page 2021

[48] [48]

The computational codes that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request

work page