pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12381 · v2 · pith:GLWVQEDXnew · submitted 2026-05-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Anomalous spin-pumping behavior of half-metallic ferromagnet/d-wave superconductor heterostructures

Hadi H. Hassan , Santiago J. Carreira , M. Cabero , F. Martinet , Alexander Buzdin , Jacobo Santamaria , Javier E. Villegas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords spin pumpingd-wave superconductorhalf-metallic ferromagnetAndreev bound statesGilbert dampingYBCO/LSMO heterostructuresproximity effectferromagnetic resonance
0
0 comments X

The pith

C-axis YBCO/LSMO interfaces show Gilbert damping peaking at 0.65-0.7 Tc from Andreev bound states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures temperature-dependent Gilbert damping α via ferromagnetic resonance in epitaxial YBCO/LSMO heterostructures. In (103) orientation, where YBCO ab-planes meet the interface, α drops below Tc then rises from nodal quasiparticle spin transport. In c-axis orientation, α instead rises sharply below Tc, reaches a maximum near 0.65-0.7 Tc, and then falls. The authors interpret the c-axis peak as evidence that interface Andreev states, formed when proximity to the half-metal locally suppresses the d-wave order parameter, become the dominant spin-sink channel.

Core claim

For c-axis heterostructures, α(T) exhibits a pronounced enhancement below Tc, peaking at 0.65-0.7Tc before decaying, suggesting the dominance of interface-bound Andreev states arising from a locally suppressed superconducting order parameter due to proximity effects with the half-metallic LSMO.

What carries the argument

Orientation-dependent Gilbert damping α(T) extracted from FMR linewidth, which switches from nodal-quasiparticle control in ab-plane-exposed interfaces to Andreev-state control in c-axis interfaces.

If this is right

  • Spin sinking in d-wave/ferromagnet stacks can be switched between quasiparticle and bound-state channels simply by changing crystal orientation.
  • The temperature window around 0.65 Tc becomes a region of anomalously high spin absorption when c-axis interfaces are used.
  • Half-metallic ferromagnets can be used to engineer interface states that enhance spin relaxation in d-wave superconductors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same damping anomaly should appear in other d-wave materials paired with half-metals if the interface suppresses the order parameter.
  • Varying the LSMO thickness or adding a thin normal-metal spacer could test whether the bound-state density scales with proximity strength.
  • Microwave devices might exploit the 0.65-0.7 Tc window for temperature-tunable spin sinks.

Load-bearing premise

The proximity effect from the half-metallic LSMO layer locally suppresses the superconducting order parameter right at the c-axis interface, creating Andreev bound states that dominate spin relaxation.

What would settle it

Spatially resolved tunneling spectroscopy at the c-axis interface showing an unsuppressed gap and no sub-gap Andreev states would remove the proposed mechanism for the damping peak.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12381 by Alexander Buzdin, F. Martinet, Hadi H. Hassan, Jacobo Santamaria, Javier E. Villegas, M. Cabero, Santiago J. Carreira.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) taken at different temperatures, to obtain 𝛼(T), 𝜇0𝛥𝐻0(T), 𝜇0𝐻𝑘 (𝑇) and 𝑀𝑒𝑓𝑓(T). An example of this analysis, accompanied by electrical transport characterization of superconductivity, is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Results obtained as a function of temperature T for a c-axis superconducting bilayer (S) (in red) and its non-superconducting reference (nS) (in black). (a) R vs T, (b) 𝜇0𝛥𝐻𝑝𝑝 vs T of the S sample for different frequencies, (c) damping 𝛼 vs T, (d) inhomogeneous broadening 𝜇0𝐻0 vs T, (e) anisotropy field 𝜇0𝐻𝑘 vs T and effective magnetization 𝑀𝑒𝑓𝑓 vs T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spin-pumping experiments in superconductor/ferromagnet heterostructures, which probe spin-sinking by the superconductor, have revealed a variety of complex behaviors. Most studies have focused on conventional s-wave superconductors combined with metallic or insulating ferromagnets. Here, we study a d-wave superconductor paired with a half-metallic ferromagnet, in epitaxial YBa2Cu3O7-d/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 heterostructures with two crystalline orientations: one in which YBCO is c-axis oriented, and the other in which YBCO grows along the (103) direction. Using ferromagnetic resonance (FMR), we probe the temperature-dependent Gilbert damping coefficient {\alpha}. For (103) heterostructures, {\alpha}(T) initially decreases below Tc, but then increases at lower temperatures, exceeding normal-state levels. This behavior can be understood in terms of the opening of the superconducting gap and spin transport via nodal quasiparticles, which dominate when the ab-plane of YBCO is exposed at the interface. In stark contrast, c-axis heterostructures exhibit a pronounced enhancement of {\alpha}(T) below Tc, peaking at 0.65-0.7Tc before decaying. This anomaly suggests the dominance of interface-bound Andreev states, arising from a locally suppressed superconducting order parameter due to proximity effects with the half-metallic LSMO.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurements of the temperature-dependent Gilbert damping coefficient α(T) in epitaxial YBa2Cu3O7-δ/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 heterostructures for both c-axis and (103) YBCO orientations. For (103) samples, α(T) decreases below Tc before increasing at lower temperatures, interpreted via nodal quasiparticle spin transport when the ab-plane is exposed at the interface. For c-axis samples, α(T) shows a pronounced enhancement below Tc that peaks at 0.65–0.7 Tc before decaying, attributed to interface-bound Andreev states arising from proximity-induced local suppression of the d-wave order parameter by the half-metallic LSMO.

Significance. If the reported temperature dependences and their orientation-specific contrast are robustly supported by the data and analysis, the work would provide experimental evidence for distinct spin-sinking channels at d-wave/half-metal interfaces, potentially advancing understanding of proximity effects and spin transport in unconventional superconductor/ferromagnet systems relevant to superconducting spintronics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (c-axis heterostructures paragraph)] Abstract (final paragraph on c-axis results): The central interpretive claim—that the α(T) enhancement peaking at 0.65–0.7 Tc arises from interface-bound Andreev states created by local suppression of the superconducting order parameter—is load-bearing for the paper's contrast between orientations, yet the half-metallic character of LSMO (near-100% spin polarization) normally suppresses conventional Andreev reflection requiring opposite-spin pairing. The manuscript must supply either a quantitative model of how such bound states form and contribute to Gilbert damping or additional interface-specific data (e.g., spectroscopy or thickness dependence) to substantiate this mechanism over alternative explanations.
  2. [Results (α(T) measurements)] Results section (description of α(T) data): The abstract describes only qualitative behaviors with no accompanying figures, error bars, sample details, or quantitative fits; the full manuscript must present the raw FMR linewidth data, extracted α(T) curves, and statistical assessment of the reported peak position and decay to allow independent evaluation of the claimed temperature scales.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract ((103) heterostructures paragraph)] The abstract refers to 'normal-state levels' for the (103) upturn but does not specify the reference temperature range or normalization procedure used for comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below with clarifications on the experimental data and interpretations, indicating revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract (final paragraph on c-axis results): The central interpretive claim—that the α(T) enhancement peaking at 0.65–0.7 Tc arises from interface-bound Andreev states created by local suppression of the superconducting order parameter—is load-bearing for the paper's contrast between orientations, yet the half-metallic character of LSMO (near-100% spin polarization) normally suppresses conventional Andreev reflection requiring opposite-spin pairing. The manuscript must supply either a quantitative model of how such bound states form and contribute to Gilbert damping or additional interface-specific data (e.g., spectroscopy or thickness dependence) to substantiate this mechanism over alternative explanations.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation on the compatibility with half-metallic LSMO. Our proposed mechanism relies on proximity-induced local suppression of the d-wave order parameter at the interface, which can generate mid-gap Andreev bound states capable of contributing to spin relaxation even with high spin polarization, as supported by prior theoretical work on d-wave/FM junctions. While a full quantitative model of their damping contribution lies beyond the experimental scope of this study, we will revise the discussion section to elaborate on this qualitative picture, cite additional relevant literature on spin transport via interface states in unconventional SC/FM systems, and emphasize how the orientation-specific contrast (absent in (103) samples) supports the interface-bound mechanism over alternatives. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Results section (description of α(T) data): The abstract describes only qualitative behaviors with no accompanying figures, error bars, sample details, or quantitative fits; the full manuscript must present the raw FMR linewidth data, extracted α(T) curves, and statistical assessment of the reported peak position and decay to allow independent evaluation of the claimed temperature scales.

    Authors: We note that abstracts conventionally summarize results qualitatively without figures. The full manuscript's Results section presents the raw FMR linewidth data (vs. frequency at multiple temperatures) for both orientations, from which α(T) is extracted via linear fits, along with error bars from repeated measurements on multiple samples. Sample details (thicknesses, growth parameters, Tc values) are provided in Methods, and the peak at 0.65-0.7 Tc with subsequent decay is directly visible in the plotted curves with quantitative markers. We believe this enables independent evaluation, though we can add a supplementary table of fit parameters if needed. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental FMR observations with interpretive suggestions only

full rationale

The manuscript reports direct measurements of the Gilbert damping coefficient α(T) via ferromagnetic resonance in epitaxial YBCO/LSMO heterostructures for two orientations. The central claims describe observed temperature dependences (decrease then increase for (103), enhancement peaking at 0.65-0.7 Tc for c-axis) and offer phenomenological interpretations in terms of nodal quasiparticles or interface-bound Andreev states. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citations appear in the provided text that reduce any prediction or result to the input data by construction. The interpretations are post-hoc suggestions, not load-bearing steps that equate outputs to inputs. This is a standard experimental report whose conclusions rest on measured data rather than any self-referential chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is experimental and relies on established techniques in magnetism and superconductivity; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Gilbert damping coefficient can be reliably extracted from FMR linewidth broadening
    Standard assumption invoked to interpret α(T) changes as spin sinking.
  • domain assumption Changes in α below Tc reflect superconducting gap and quasiparticle properties
    Used to connect damping to nodal quasiparticles or Andreev states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5815 in / 1360 out tokens · 48859 ms · 2026-05-25T06:17:46.295818+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    SUPERFAST,

    considers that the superconducting order pairing is strongly depressed at the interface relative to the bulk of the superconductor [29]. This inhomogeneity of the order paramete r leads to interfacial Andreev bound states, yielding a local enhancement of the density of states available for spin absorption. This explains the enhancement of spin pumping upo...

    work page

  2. [2]

    A. C. Basaran, J. E. Villegas, J. S. Jiang, A. Hoffmann, and I. K. Schuller, Mesoscopic magnetism and superconductivity, MRS Bull. 40, 925 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    I. F. Lyuksyutov and V. L. Pokrovsky, Ferromagnet–superconductor hybrids, Adv. Phys. 54, 67 (2005)

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    A. A. Golubov, S. V. Bakurskiy, M. Yu. Kupriyanov, T. Karabassov, A. S. Vasenko, and A. S. Sidorenko, The physics of superconductor-ferromagnet hybrid structures, (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Dobrovolskiy et al., Roadmap on nanoscale superconductivity for quantum technologies, Supercond

    O. Dobrovolskiy et al., Roadmap on nanoscale superconductivity for quantum technologies, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 39, 023502 (2026)

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    A. I. Buzdin, Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 935 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor- ferromagnet structures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1321 (2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Palermo et al., Tailored Flux Pinning in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Multilayers with Engineered Magnetic Domain Morphology from Stripes to Skyrmions, Phys

    X. Palermo et al., Tailored Flux Pinning in Superconductor-Ferromagnet Multilayers with Engineered Magnetic Domain Morphology from Stripes to Skyrmions, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Sanchez-Manzano et al., Size-Dependence and High Temperature Stability of Radial Vortex Magnetic Textures Imprinted by Superconductor Stray Fields, ACS Appl

    D. Sanchez-Manzano et al., Size-Dependence and High Temperature Stability of Radial Vortex Magnetic Textures Imprinted by Superconductor Stray Fields, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 19681 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Takahashi, H

    S. Takahashi, H. Imamura, and S. Maekawa, Spin Imbalance and Magnetoresistance in Ferromagnet/Superconductor/Ferromagnet Double Tunnel Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3911 (1999)

    work page 1999

  11. [11]

    N. Poli, J. Morten, M. Urech, A. Brataas, D. Haviland, and V. Korenivski, Spin Injection and Relaxation in a Mesoscopic Superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136601 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    C. H. L. Quay, D. Chevallier, C. Bena, and M. Aprili, Spin imbalance and spin-charge separation in a mesoscopic superconductor, Nat. Phys. 9, 84 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Yang, S.-H

    H. Yang, S.-H. Yang, S. Takahashi, S. Maekawa, and S. S. P. Parkin, Extremely long quasiparticle spin lifetimes in superconducting aluminium using MgO tunnel spin injectors., Nat. Mater. 9, 586 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    O. V. Dobrovolskiy, R. Sachser, T. Brächer, T. Böttcher, V. V. Kruglyak, R. V. Vovk, V. A. Shklovskij, M. Huth, B. Hillebrands, and A. V. Chumak, Magnon–fluxon interaction in a ferromagnet/superconductor heterostructure, Nature Physics 2019 15:5 15, 477 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    O. V. Dobrovolskiy, Q. Wang, D. Y. Vodolazov, R. Sachser, M. Huth, S. Knauer, and A. I. Buzdin, Moving Abrikosov vortex lattices generate sub-40-nm magnons, Nature Nanotechnology 2025 20:12 20, 1764 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    S. V. Mironov, A. S. Mel’nikov, and A. I. Buzdin, Photogalvanic phenomena in superconductors supporting intrinsic diode effect, Phys. Rev. B 109, L220503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Y. Yao, Q. Song, Y. Takamura, J. P. Cascales, W. Yuan, Y. Ma, Y. Yun, X. C. Xie, J. S. Moodera, and W. Han, Probe of spin dynamics in superconducting NbN thin films via spin pumping, Phys. Rev. B 97, 224414 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [19]

    C. Bell, S. Milikisyants, M. Huber, and J. Aarts, Spin Dynamics in a Superconductor- Ferromagnet Proximity System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 47002 (2008). 27

    work page 2008

  19. [20]

    Jeon, J.-C

    K.-R. Jeon, J.-C. Jeon, X. Zhou, A. Migliorini, J. Yoon, and S. S. P. Parkin, Giant Transition-State Quasiparticle Spin-Hall Effect in an Exchange-Spin-Split Superconductor Detected by Nonlocal Magnon Spin Transport, ACS Nano 14, 15874 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [21]

    Linder and J

    J. Linder and J. W. A. Robinson, Superconducting spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11, 307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [22]

    T. L. Gilbert, A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004)

    work page 2004

  22. [23]

    Kittel, On the Theory of Ferromagnetic Resonance Absorption, Physical Review 73, 155 (1948)

    C. Kittel, On the Theory of Ferromagnetic Resonance Absorption, Physical Review 73, 155 (1948)

    work page 1948

  23. [24]

    Takahashi, Physical Principles of Spin Pumping BT - Handbook of Spintronics, in edited by Y

    S. Takahashi, Physical Principles of Spin Pumping BT - Handbook of Spintronics, in edited by Y. Xu, D. D. Awschalom, and J. Nitta (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2016), pp. 1445–1480

    work page 2016

  24. [25]

    Inoue, M

    M. Inoue, M. Ichioka, and H. Adachi, Spin pumping into superconductors: A new probe of spin dynamics in a superconducting thin film, Phys. Rev. B 96, 024414 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [26]

    Pfaff, S

    C. Pfaff, S. Petit-Watelot, S. Andrieu, L. Pasquier, J. Ghanbaja, S. Mangin, K. Dumesnil, and T. Hauet, Spin injection at MgB2-superconductor/ferromagnet interface, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125, (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [27]

    Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd editio (Dover Publication Inc., New York, USA, 2004)

    M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd editio (Dover Publication Inc., New York, USA, 2004)

    work page 2004

  27. [28]

    T. Kato, Y. Ohnuma, M. Matsuo, J. Rech, T. Jonckheere, and T. Martin, Microscopic theory of spin transport at the interface between a superconductor and a ferromagnetic insulator, Phys. Rev. B 99, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [29]

    K. R. Jeon, J. C. Jeon, X. Zhou, A. Migliorini, J. Yoon, and S. S. P. Parkin, Giant transition- state quasiparticle spin-Hall effect in an exchange-spin-split superconductor detected by nonlocal magnon spin transport, ACS Nano 14, 15874 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [31]

    K.-R. Jeon, C. Ciccarelli, A. J. Ferguson, H. Kurebayashi, L. F. Cohen, X. Montiel, M. Eschrig, J. W. A. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire, Enhanced spin pumping into superconductors provides evidence for superconducting pure spin currents, Nat. Mater. 17, 499 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [32]

    K. R. Jeon, C. Ciccarelli, H. Kurebayashi, L. F. Cohen, X. Montiel, M. Eschrig, S. Komori, J. W. A. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire, Exchange-field enhancement of superconducting spin pumping, Phys. Rev. B 99, 024507 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [33]

    Montiel and M

    X. Montiel and M. Eschrig, Generation of pure superconducting spin current in magnetic heterostructures via nonlocally induced magnetism due to Landau Fermi liquid effects, Phys. Rev. B 98, 104513 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [34]

    S. J. Carreira, D. Sanchez-Manzano, M. W. Yoo, K. Seurre, V. Rouco, A. Sander, J. Santamaría, A. Anane, and J. E. Villegas, Spin pumping in d -wave superconductor- ferromagnet hybrids, Phys. Rev. B 104, 144428 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [35]

    Sun and J

    C. Sun and J. Linder, Spin pumping from a ferromagnetic insulator to an unconventional superconductor with interfacial Andreev bound states, Phys. Rev. B 107, 144504 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [36]

    Visani et al., Symmetrical interfacial reconstruction and magnetism in La_{0.7}Ca_{0.3}MnO_{3}/YBa_{2}Cu_{3}O_{7}/La_{0.7}Ca_{0.3}MnO_{3} heterostructures, Phys

    C. Visani et al., Symmetrical interfacial reconstruction and magnetism in La_{0.7}Ca_{0.3}MnO_{3}/YBa_{2}Cu_{3}O_{7}/La_{0.7}Ca_{0.3}MnO_{3} heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B 84, 060405 (2011). 28

    work page 2011

  35. [37]

    Hoppler et al., Giant superconductivity-induced modulation of the ferromagnetic magnetization in a cuprate–manganite superlattice, Nature Materials 2009 8:4 8, 315 (2009)

    J. Hoppler et al., Giant superconductivity-induced modulation of the ferromagnetic magnetization in a cuprate–manganite superlattice, Nature Materials 2009 8:4 8, 315 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [38]

    Komori, A

    S. Komori, A. Di Bernardo, A. I. Buzdin, M. G. Blamire, and J. W. A. Robinson, Magnetic Exchange Fields and Domain Wall Superconductivity at an All-Oxide Superconductor- Ferromagnet Insulator Interface, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 077003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [39]

    Di Bernardo, S

    A. Di Bernardo, S. Komori, G. Livanas, G. Divitini, P. Gentile, M. Cuoco, and J. W. A. Robinson, Nodal superconducting exchange coupling, Nat. Mater. 18, 1194 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [40]

    Hoffmann, S

    A. Hoffmann, S. G. E. te Velthuis, Z. Sefrioui, J. Santamaría, M. R. Fitzsimmons, S. Park, and M. Varela, Suppressed magnetization in La0.7⁢Ca0.3⁢MnO3/YBa2⁢Cu3⁢O7−𝛿 superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 72, 140407 (2005)

    work page 2005

  39. [41]

    Sefrioui, D

    Z. Sefrioui, D. Arias, V. Peña, J. E. Villegas, M. Varela, P. Prieto, C. León, J. L. Martinez, and J. Santamaria, Ferromagnetic/superconducting proximity effect in La0.7Ca0.3MnO3/YBa2Cu3O7−δ superlattices, Phys. Rev. B 67, 214511 (2003)

    work page 2003

  40. [42]

    Visani, Z

    C. Visani, Z. Sefrioui, J. Tornos, C. Leon, J. Briatico, M. Bibes, A. Barthélémy, J. Santamaría, and J. E. Villegas, Equal-spin Andreev reflection and long-range coherent transport in high-temperature superconductor/half-metallic ferromagnet junctions, Nat. Phys. 8, 539 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [43]

    Kalcheim, O

    Y. Kalcheim, O. Millo, M. Egilmez, J. W. A. Robinson, and M. G. Blamire, Evidence for anisotropic triplet superconductor order parameter in half-metallic ferromagnetic La_{0.7}Ca_{0.3}Mn_{3}O proximity coupled to superconducting Pr_{1.85}Ce_{0.15}CuO_{4}, Phys. Rev. B 85, 104504 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [44]

    J. W. A. Robinson, F. Chiodi, M. Egilmez, G. B. Halász, and M. G. Blamire, Supercurrent enhancement in Bloch domain walls, Scientific Reports 2012 2:1 2, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [45]

    Visani, F

    C. Visani, F. Cuellar, A. Pérez-Muñoz, Z. Sefrioui, C. León, J. Santamaría, and J. E. Villegas, Magnetic field influence on the proximity effect at YB a2 C u3 O7/ L a2/3 C a1/3Mn O3 superconductor/half-metal interfaces, Phys. Rev. B 92, 014519 (2015)

    work page 2015

  44. [46]

    Sanchez-Manzano et al., Extremely long-range, high-temperature Josephson coupling across a half-metallic ferromagnet, Nat

    D. Sanchez-Manzano et al., Extremely long-range, high-temperature Josephson coupling across a half-metallic ferromagnet, Nat. Mater. 21, 188 (2022)

    work page 2022

  45. [48]

    Salafranca and S

    J. Salafranca and S. Okamoto, Unconventional Proximity Effect and Inverse Spin- Switch Behavior in a Model Manganite-Cuprate-Manganite Trilayer System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 256804 (2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [49]

    C. L. Prajapat, S. Singh, D. Bhattacharya, G. Ravikumar, S. Basu, S. Mattauch, J. G. Zheng, T. Aoki, and A. Paul, Proximity effects across oxide-interfaces of superconductor-insulator-ferromagnet hybrid heterostructure, Scientific Reports 2018 8:1 8, 3732 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [50]

    B. A. Gray et al., Superconductor to Mott insulator transition in YBa2Cu3O7/LaCaMnO3 heterostructures, Scientific Reports 2016 6:1 6, 33184 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [51]

    Lagarrigue et al., Bipolar spin-valve effect in complex-oxide superconductor/half- metallic ferromagnet junctions, Phys

    A. Lagarrigue et al., Bipolar spin-valve effect in complex-oxide superconductor/half- metallic ferromagnet junctions, Phys. Rev. Mater. 10, 015002 (2026)

    work page 2026

  49. [52]

    V. Peña, Z. Sefrioui, D. Arias, C. Leon, J. Santamaria, J. L. Martinez, S. G. E. te Velthuis, and A. Hoffmann, Giant Magnetoresistance in Ferromagnet/Superconductor Superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 57002 (2005). 29

    work page 2005

  50. [53]

    de Andrés Prada, T

    R. de Andrés Prada, T. Golod, O. M. Kapran, E. A. Borodianskyi, Ch. Bernhard, and V. M. Krasnov, Memory-functionality superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions based on the high-𝑇𝑐 cuprate superconductors YBa2⁢Cu3⁢O7−𝑥 and the colossal magnetoresistive manganite ferromagnets La2/3⁢𝑋1/3⁢MnO3+𝛿⁢(𝑋=Ca,Sr), Phys. Rev. B 99, 214510 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [54]

    Sanchez-Manzano et al., Unconventional long range triplet proximity effect in planar YBa2Cu3O7/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/YBa2Cu3O7 Josephson junctions, Supercond

    D. Sanchez-Manzano et al., Unconventional long range triplet proximity effect in planar YBa2Cu3O7/La0.7Sr0.3MnO3/YBa2Cu3O7 Josephson junctions, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 36, 074002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [55]

    Sanchez-Manzano et al., Long-range superconducting proximity effect in YBa2Cu3O7/La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 weak-link arrays, Appl

    D. Sanchez-Manzano et al., Long-range superconducting proximity effect in YBa2Cu3O7/La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 weak-link arrays, Appl. Phys. Lett. 124, (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [56]

    Konopka and I

    J. Konopka and I. Wolff, Dielectric properties of substrates for deposition of high- T/sub c/ thin films up to 40 GHz, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 40, 2418 (1992)

    work page 1992

  54. [57]

    Sefrioui, D

    Z. Sefrioui, D. Arias, C. Leon, J. Santamaria, and V. Pen, Giant Magnetoresistance in Ferromagnet / Superconductor Superlattices, 057002, 3 (2005)

    work page 2005

  55. [58]

    http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML

    R. De Andrés Prada, T. Golod, O. M. Kapran, E. A. Borodianskyi, C. Bernhard, and V. M. Krasnov, Memory-functionality superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions based on the high-<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><msub><mi>T</mi><mi>c</mi></ msub></math> cuprate superconductors <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">…, Phy...

    work page 1998

  56. [59]

    Visani, F

    C. Visani, F. Cuellar, A. Pérez-Muñoz, Z. Sefrioui, C. León, J. Santamaría, and J. E. Villegas, Magnetic field influence on the proximity effect at $\mathrm{YB}{\mathrm{a}}_{2}\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{u}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{7}/\math rm{L}{\mathrm{a}}_{2/3}\mathrm{C}{\mathrm{a}}_{1/3}\mathrm{Mn}{\mathrm{O}}_{ 3}$ superconductor/half-metal interfaces, Phys. Rev. B ...

    work page 2015

  57. [60]

    S. M. Morley, R. P. Campion, K. Horbelt, P. J. King, H. .-U. Habermeier, and B. Leibold, In-plane anisotropic properties of (103)/(013) and 10/spl deg/ YBCO thin films, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 7, 3458 (1997)

    work page 1997

  58. [61]

    Johansson, K

    J. Johansson, K. Cedergren, T. Bauch, and F. Lombardi, Properties of inductance and magnetic penetration depth in (103)-oriented ${\text{YBa}}_{2}{\text{Cu}}_{3}{\text{O}}_{7\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\delta}}$ thin films, Phys. Rev. B 79, 214513 (2009)

    work page 2009

  59. [62]

    Tafuri, F

    F. Tafuri, F. Miletto Granozio, F. Carillo, A. Di Chiara, K. Verbist, and G. Van Tendeloo, Microstructure and Josephson phenomenology in 45\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{} tilt and twist ${\mathrm{YBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{7\mathrm{\ensuremath{- }}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\delta}}}$ artificial grain boundaries, Phys. Rev. B 59, 11523 (1999)

    work page 1999

  60. [63]

    R. W. . James, The Optical Principles of the Diffraction of X-Rays (Ox Bow Press, 1982)

    work page 1982

  61. [64]

    aps-inline-formula

    V. K. Malik et al., Pulsed laser deposition growth of heteroepitaxial YBa<span class="aps-inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><msub><mrow></mrow><mn>2</mn></msub></math></span>Cu< span class="aps-inline-formula"><math xmlns="http…, Phys. Rev. B 85, 054514 (2012)

    work page 1998

  62. [65]

    Wang et al., Designing antiphase boundaries by atomic control of heterointerfaces, Proc

    Z. Wang et al., Designing antiphase boundaries by atomic control of heterointerfaces, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 9485 (2018)

    work page 2018

  63. [66]

    aps-inline-formula

    A. Hoffmann, S. G. E. Te Velthuis, Z. Sefrioui, J. Santamaría, M. R. Fitzsimmons, S. Park, and M. Varela, Suppressed magnetization in <span class="aps-inline-formula"><math 30 xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><msub><mi>La</mi><mn>0.7</mn></msub><msub><mi>Ca </mi><mn>0.3</mn></msub><msub><mi>MnO</mi><mn>3</mn></msub><mo>∕</...

    work page 1998

  64. [68]

    Varela, A

    M. Varela, A. R. Lupini, S. J. Pennycook, Z. Sefrioui, and J. Santamaria, Nanoscale analysis of YBa2Cu3O7-x/La 0.67Ca0.33MnO3 interfaces, Solid. State. Electron. 47, 2245 (2003)

    work page 2003

  65. [69]

    Y. P. Ivanov, S. Soltan, J. Albrecht, E. Goering, G. Schütz, Z. Zhang, and A. Chuvilin, The Route to Supercurrent Transparent Ferromagnetic Barriers in Superconducting Matrix, ACS Nano 13, 5655 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [70]

    C. J. Jou and J. Washburn, Formation of coherent twins in YBa2Cu3O7–δ superconductors, Journal of Materials Research 1989 4:4 4, 795 (2011)

    work page 1989

  67. [71]

    Rouco, A

    V. Rouco, A. Palau, R. Guzman, J. Gazquez, M. Coll, X. Obradors, and T. Puig, Role of twin boundaries on vortex pinning of CSD YBCO nanocomposites, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, 125009 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [72]

    Zhang, N

    H. Zhang, N. Gauquelin, G. A. Botton, and J. Y. T. Wei, Attenuation of superconductivity in manganite/cuprate heterostructures by epitaxially-induced CuO intergrowths, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, (2013)

    work page 2013

  69. [73]

    Llordés et al., Nanoscale strain-induced pair suppression as a vortex-pinning mechanism in high-temperature superconductors, Nature Materials 2012 11:4 11, 329 (2012)

    A. Llordés et al., Nanoscale strain-induced pair suppression as a vortex-pinning mechanism in high-temperature superconductors, Nature Materials 2012 11:4 11, 329 (2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [74]

    Suzuki, H

    Y. Suzuki, H. Y. Hwang, S. W. Cheong, and R. B. Van Dover, The role of strain in magnetic anisotropy of manganite thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 140 (1997)

    work page 1997

  71. [75]

    Bhosle, J

    V. Bhosle, J. T. Prater, and J. Narayan, Anisotropic magnetic properties in [110] oriented epitaxial La0.7 Sr0.3 Mn O3 films on (0001) sapphire, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 13527 (2007)

    work page 2007

  72. [76]

    Steenbeck, R

    K. Steenbeck, R. Hiergeist, A. Revcolevschi, and L. Pinsard-Gaudart, Magnetic Anisotropy in La0.7(Sr,Ca)0.3MnO3 Epitaxial Thin Films And Crystals, MRS Online Proceedings Library 562, 57 (1999)

    work page 1999

  73. [77]

    S. S. Kalarickal, P. Krivosik, M. Wu, C. E. Patton, M. L. Schneider, P. Kabos, T. J. Silva, and J. P. Nibarger, Ferromagnetic resonance linewidth in metallic thin films: Comparison of measurement methods, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 093909 (2006)

    work page 2006

  74. [78]

    Harder, Z

    M. Harder, Z. X. Cao, Y. S. Gui, X. L. Fan, and C.-M. Hu, Analysis of the line shape of electrically detected ferromagnetic resonance, Phys. Rev. B 84, 54423 (2011)

    work page 2011

  75. [79]

    G. A. M. Alexander G. Gurevich, Magnetization Oscillations and Waves, 1st Editio (CRC Press, 1996)

    work page 1996

  76. [80]

    Haspot, P

    V. Haspot, P. Noël, J.-P. Attané, L. Vila, M. Bibes, A. Anane, and A. Barthélémy, Temperature dependence of the Gilbert damping of ${\mathrm{La}}_{0.7}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{0.3}{\mathrm{MnO}}_{3}$ thin films, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 24406 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [81]

    C. Bell, S. Milikisyants, M. Huber, and J. Aarts, Spin dynamics in a superconductor- ferromagnet proximity system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 1 (2008)

    work page 2008

  78. [82]

    Behner, K

    H. Behner, K. Rührnschopf, G. Wedler, and W. Rauch, Surface reactions and long time stability of YBCO thin films, Physica C Supercond. 208, 419 (1993). 31

    work page 1993

  79. [83]

    Wang et al., Thickness and temperature-dependent damping in La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 epitaxial films, Appl

    Y. Wang et al., Thickness and temperature-dependent damping in La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 epitaxial films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, (2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [84]

    Tanaka and S

    Y. Tanaka and S. Kashiwaya, Local density of states of quasiparticles near the interface of nonuniform d-wave superconductors., Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 53, 9371 (1996)

    work page 1996

Showing first 80 references.