pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14100 · v1 · pith:USILHEBNnew · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🪐 quant-ph

Effective Hamiltonians in Cavity and Waveguide QED from Transition-Operator Diagrammatic Perturbation Theory

Mohamed Meguebel , Maxime Federico , Louis Garbe , Nadia Belabas , Nicolas Fabre This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 05:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords effective Hamiltonianadiabatic eliminationdispersive regimecavity QEDwaveguide QEDperturbation theorydiagrammatic methodsmultiphoton processes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Transition-operator diagrammatic perturbation theory enables systematic derivation of effective Hamiltonians in cavity and waveguide QED at arbitrary orders.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an adiabatic-elimination method in the dispersive regime by recasting perturbative expansions into a diagrammatic framework based on transition operators and applying controlled projections onto transition subspaces. This formalism operates at any chosen order of perturbation and handles multilevel systems together with multiple qubits in both cavity and waveguide settings. It produces explicit higher-order effective Hamiltonians while avoiding restrictions that limit other techniques. A sympathetic reader would value the result because it supplies a practical route to accurate modeling of multiphoton processes without order-by-order breakdowns.

Core claim

The authors propose an adiabatic-elimination formalism in the dispersive regime based on a transition-centric perturbation theory. The perturbative expansion is recast into a diagrammatic framework, while adiabatic elimination is implemented through controlled projections onto transition subspaces. This yields effective higher-order Hamiltonians for multilevel systems and multiple qubits in cavity and waveguide quantum electrodynamics.

What carries the argument

Transition-operator diagrammatic perturbation theory combined with controlled projections onto transition subspaces to perform adiabatic elimination.

If this is right

  • Effective Hamiltonians become constructible at any perturbation order without accumulating uncontrolled errors.
  • The same framework covers both cavity and waveguide geometries for arbitrary numbers of qubits or atomic levels.
  • Multiphoton processes in the dispersive regime receive systematic, explicit corrections beyond second order.
  • Existing limitations on system complexity or perturbative order are bypassed for concrete calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be tested by comparing predicted fourth-order shifts against exact diagonalization in small systems.
  • Time-dependent drives or weak dissipation might be incorporated by extending the same diagrammatic rules.
  • Similar transition-operator projections could simplify effective models in circuit QED or Rydberg arrays.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbative expansion and the projections onto transition subspaces remain valid and controlled at arbitrary orders in the dispersive regime.

What would settle it

A measured higher-order dispersive shift or multiphoton transition rate in a two-qubit or multilevel system that deviates from the explicit effective Hamiltonian constructed by the method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14100 by Louis Garbe, Maxime Federico, Mohamed Meguebel, Nadia Belabas, Nicolas Fabre.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematics illustrating the dispersive perturbative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. JLM diagrams elementary blocks. States of matter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Example of a first-order (panel a.) and second-order [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Perturbative expansion up to second order of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Schematic illustration of how a JLM diagram (of con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. First order ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. First order ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. First-order JLM diagrams for an atomic two-level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Zeroth and first-order JLM diagrams for the Tavis-Cummings model (top row) and the additional counter-rotating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. First-order mediated-coupling JLM diagrams for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Sketch of the three JLM diagrams diagrams re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Pictorial representation of the proof of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Equivalence of JLM diagrams at first order when there are multiplicities due to their reading orientation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Equivalence of JLM diagrams at second order when there are multiplicities due to their reading orientation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Comparison of the maximum number of diagrams, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose an adiabatic-elimination formalism in the dispersive regime based on a transition-centric perturbation theory. The perturbative expansion is recast into a diagrammatic framework, while adiabatic elimination is implemented through controlled projections onto transition subspaces. Our approach applies systematically at arbitrary perturbation order, and is suited to multilevel systems and multiple qubits in both cavity and waveguide quantum electrodynamics. It ultimately enables the explicit construction of effective higher-order Hamiltonians while bypassing important limitations of existing techniques, thereby providing a practical toolbox for multiphoton processes in the dispersive regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a transition-centric diagrammatic perturbation theory for adiabatic elimination in the dispersive regime of cavity and waveguide QED. It recasts the perturbative expansion into diagrams and implements elimination through controlled projections onto transition subspaces, enabling systematic construction of effective Hamiltonians at arbitrary orders for multilevel systems and multiple qubits while bypassing limitations of prior methods.

Significance. If the projection rules and diagrammatic construction hold, the approach supplies a practical, order-by-order toolbox for higher-order effective Hamiltonians in multi-qubit and multilevel dispersive systems. The systematic character at arbitrary perturbation order and explicit applicability to both cavity and waveguide geometries constitute a clear advance over existing adiabatic-elimination techniques that often require case-by-case fitting or truncation.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the method 'bypasses important limitations of existing techniques,' but the manuscript should include a concise table or paragraph in the introduction that explicitly lists those limitations (e.g., restriction to two-level systems, inability to reach third-order terms) and shows how the diagrammatic projection rules overcome each one.
  2. Notation for the transition operators and the projection rules onto subspaces should be introduced with a single, self-contained definition block early in the text (ideally §2) rather than being distributed across multiple sections; this would improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the diagrammatic formalism.
  3. The manuscript would benefit from at least one fully worked numerical example (e.g., a three-level atom coupled to a waveguide) that compares the derived effective Hamiltonian against exact diagonalization or master-equation simulation up to the claimed perturbative order.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the recognition of its systematic character at arbitrary order and applicability to both cavity and waveguide geometries. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation chain consists of a standard perturbative expansion in the dispersive regime, recast into a diagrammatic representation with explicit projection rules onto transition subspaces. These steps are defined directly from the system Hamiltonian and the adiabatic-elimination condition without invoking fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The resulting effective Hamiltonians at arbitrary order follow from the diagrammatic rules applied to the original interaction terms, remaining self-contained and independent of the target result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard domain assumptions of dispersive QED and perturbative validity; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The system operates in the dispersive regime where detuning greatly exceeds coupling strengths.
    Explicitly invoked as the regime where the formalism applies.
  • domain assumption Perturbation theory converges at arbitrary order for the targeted multilevel and multi-qubit systems.
    Required for the claim of systematic applicability at any order.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5396 in / 1146 out tokens · 31736 ms · 2026-05-15T05:18:17.230992+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Recall the perturbative expansion Eq

    Computation with nested convolution products We first carry out the calculation by means of nested convolution products arising from the perturbative expansion. Recall the perturbative expansion Eq. (15) ˆξj(0) iσ (ω, t) =e −iLfree(t−t0) ˆξj iσ(ω) (B1) ˆξj(1) iσ (ω, t) =−i Z t t0 dτ e −iLfree(t−τ) Linte−iLfree(τ−t 0) ˆξj iσ(ω) (B2) ˆξj(2) iσ (ω, t) = (−i)...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Computation with the resolvent In this subsection, we demonstrate how the time weightsv n(t) in Eq. (B13) may equivalently be retrieved by manipulating the resolventG(s) of the LiouvillianL G(s) = 1 s+iL ,Re(s)>0.(B14) G(s) is obtained by considering the evolution superoperator in Liouville spaceU(t, t 0) =e −iL(t−t0) define as dU(t, t 0) dt =−iL U(t, t 0...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Computation of the reverse process’ weight This section provides a computation of the time weightv reverse n (t) of the reverse process of a givenn-th order JLM transition operator of time weightv n(t), which reads vn(t) = (−1)NL nX l=0 e−i∆lte−Θlt nY k=0 k̸=l 1 ∆l −∆ k +i(Θ k −Θ l) (B20) More specifically, we show thatv reverse n (t) =v ∗ n(t), entailing...

    work page

  4. [4]

    1 (t)|γ⟩ ⟨α| ⊗ˆa† σj(ω′)ˆaσi(ω) + h.c,(C4) where the 1/2 factor stems from rule (R5) II B

    Mediated-coupling correction The correction to the interaction Hamiltonian due to the mediated coupling|γ⟩ ⟨α| ⊗ˆa † σj(ω′)ˆaσi(ω) reads ∆ ˆH(1) med.(t) = 1 2 Z R+ dω g β α(ω) Z R+ dω′ gγ β(ω′)W total,med. 1 (t)|γ⟩ ⟨α| ⊗ˆa† σj(ω′)ˆaσi(ω) + h.c,(C4) where the 1/2 factor stems from rule (R5) II B. Using Eq. (C3), ∆ ˆH(1) med.(t) = 1 2 Z R+ dω g β α(ω) Z R+ ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Stark-shift correction Employing the same procedure for the Stark-shift contributions lead to the total correction to the Hamiltonian at first order ∆ ˆH(1) int (t) ∆ ˆH(1) int (t) = 1 2 |γ⟩ ⟨α| ⊗ P Z (R+)2 dω′dω g γ β(ω′)gβ α(ω)e−i(ω−ω ′−ωγ)t 1 δi(ω) − 1 δj(ω′) ˆa† σj(ω′)ˆaσi(ω) ! + h.c + 1 2 |α⟩ ⟨α| ⊗ P Z (R+)2 dω′dω h Fi(ω, ω′)ˆa† σi(ω′)ˆaσi(ω) +F ∗ i ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Consider the interaction Hamiltonian Eq

    Combinatorial upper bound This section is dedicated to evaluating the number of JLM diagrams needed to encapsulate the whole system’s dynamics. Consider the interaction Hamiltonian Eq. (3) in a more compact form Eq. (4) with a numberMof JLM transition operators ˆHint =PM/2 m=1 ˆξm + h.c where ˆξm are the zeroth-order JLM transition operators. a. Multileve...

    work page

  7. [7]

    For simplicity and without loss of generality, the bosonic modes are defined for a discrete set, not a continuum

    JLM diagrams multiplicities In this subsection, we illustrate, for a multilevel atomic system, the matter-cyclic condition and the role of bosonic- operator permutations for first- and second-order JLM diagrams. For simplicity and without loss of generality, the bosonic modes are defined for a discrete set, not a continuum. a. First order Consider a first...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Number of JLM diagrams This subsection is dedicated to calculating an upper limit on the number of JLM diagrams to be drawn at first and second order of the perturbation expansion. a. First order At first ordern= 1 of the perturbation expansion, the previous section demonstrated thatat most M+1 2 JLM diagrams – which correspond toat most4 M+1 2 first-orde...

    work page

  9. [9]

    As before, V2(t) denotes the time-dependent contribution ofW 2(t) which also accounts for the coupling terms involved in the corresponding diagram

    Weight computation In this subsection, we compute the weightV 2(t) of the second-order three-photon JLM diagrams. As before, V2(t) denotes the time-dependent contribution ofW 2(t) which also accounts for the coupling terms involved in the corresponding diagram. Recalling the general canonical time weight Eq. (20) atnth order of a givennth order JLM transi...

    work page

  10. [10]

    II B 7, poles may emerge ifδ j =−δ k,δ j =−δ i or δk =δ i =−δ j, which amounts to having cumulative-detuning degeneracies ∆ 0 = ∆ 2

    Dealing with cumulative-detuning degeneracies As opposed to the first-order computation covered in Sec. II B 7, poles may emerge ifδ j =−δ k,δ j =−δ i or δk =δ i =−δ j, which amounts to having cumulative-detuning degeneracies ∆ 0 = ∆ 2. We now show that the divergences cancel. Let us assume for instance thatδ j =−δ k and analyzev canonical 2 (t) where a p...

    work page

  11. [11]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems(OUP Oxford, 2002)

    work page 2002

  12. [12]

    Finkelstein-Shapiro, D

    D. Finkelstein-Shapiro, D. Viennot, I. Saideh, T. Hansen, T. Pullerits, and A. Keller, Adiabatic elimination and subspace evolution of open quantum systems, Physical Review A101, 042102 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Gonzalez-Ballestero, Tutorial: projector approach to master equations for open quantum systems, Quantum8, 1454 (2024)

    C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, Tutorial: projector approach to master equations for open quantum systems, Quantum8, 1454 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Le R´ egent and P

    F.-M. Le R´ egent and P. Rouchon, Heisenberg formulation of adiabatic elimination for open quantum systems with two timescales, in2023 62nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)(IEEE, 2023) pp. 7208–7213

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Puri and R

    R. Puri and R. Bullough, Quantum electrodynamics of an atom making two-photon transitions in an ideal cavity, Journal of the Optical Society of America B5, 2021 (1988)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    C. C. Gerry and J. Eberly, Dynamics of a raman coupled model interacting with two quantized cavity fields, Physical Review A42, 6805 (1990)

    work page 1990

  17. [17]

    Wu, Effective raman theory for a three-level atom in theλconfiguration, Physical Review A54, 1586 (1996)

    Y. Wu, Effective raman theory for a three-level atom in theλconfiguration, Physical Review A54, 1586 (1996)

    work page 1996

  18. [18]

    Alexanian and S

    M. Alexanian and S. K. Bose, Unitary transformation and the dynamics of a three-level atom interacting with two quantized field modes, Physical Review A52, 2218 (1995)

    work page 1995

  19. [19]

    Brion, L

    E. Brion, L. H. Pedersen, and K. Mølmer, Adiabatic elimination in a lambda system, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical40, 1033 (2007)

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Paulisch, H

    V. Paulisch, H. Rui, H. K. Ng, and B.-G. Englert, Beyond adiabatic elimination: A hierarchy of approximations for multi-photon processes, The European Physical Journal Plus129, 1 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [22]

    Maity, Adiabatic elimination in the presence of multiphoton transitions in atoms inside a cavity, International Journal of Modern Physics B , 2450439 (2024)

    P. Maity, Adiabatic elimination in the presence of multiphoton transitions in atoms inside a cavity, International Journal of Modern Physics B , 2450439 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [23]

    Pedernales, I

    J. Pedernales, I. Lizuain, S. Felicetti, G. Romero, L. Lamata, and E. Solano, Quantum rabi model with trapped ions, Scientific reports5, 15472 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [24]

    Linskens, I

    A. Linskens, I. Holleman, N. Dam, and J. Reuss, Two-photon rabi oscillations, Physical Review A54, 4854 (1996)

    work page 1996

  24. [25]

    Bravyi, D

    S. Bravyi, D. P. DiVincenzo, and D. Loss, Schrieffer–wolff transformation for quantum many-body systems, Annals of physics326, 2793 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [26]

    James and J

    D. James and J. Jerke, Effective hamiltonian theory and its applications in quantum information, Canadian Journal of Physics85, 625 (2007)

    work page 2007

  26. [27]

    Gamel and D

    O. Gamel and D. F. James, Time-averaged quantum dynamics and the validity of the effective hamiltonian model, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics82, 052106 (2010)

    work page 2010

  27. [28]

    N. N. Bogolubov Jr, A. K. Prykarpatsky, and U. Taneri,Quantum field theory with application to quantum nonlinear optics (World Scientific Publishing Company, 2002)

    work page 2002

  28. [29]

    Zee,Quantum field theory in a nutshell, Vol

    A. Zee,Quantum field theory in a nutshell, Vol. 7 (Princeton university press, 2010). 33

    work page 2010

  29. [30]

    C. J. Bord´ e, Density matrix equations and diagrams for high resolution non-linear laser spectroscopy: application to ramsey fringes in the optical domain, inAdvances in laser spectroscopy(Springer, 1983) pp. 1–70

    work page 1983

  30. [31]

    R. W. Boyd, A. L. Gaeta, and E. Giese, Nonlinear optics, inSpringer Handbook of Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Springer, 2008) pp. 1097–1110

    work page 2008

  31. [32]

    Hache,Optique non lin´ eaire(EDP Sciences Les Ulis, France, 2016)

    F. Hache,Optique non lin´ eaire(EDP Sciences Les Ulis, France, 2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [33]

    C. A. Marx, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear optical spectroscopy of single, few, and many molecules: Nonequilib- rium green’s function qed approach, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics77, 022110 (2008)

    work page 2008

  33. [34]

    Roslyak and S

    O. Roslyak and S. Mukamel, A unified description of sum frequency generation, parametric down conversion and two-photon fluorescence, Molecular physics107, 265 (2009)

    work page 2009

  34. [35]

    Mukamel and S

    S. Mukamel and S. Rahav, Ultrafast nonlinear optical signals viewed from the molecule’s perspective: Kramers–heisenberg transition-amplitudes versus susceptibilities, inAdvances in atomic, molecular, and optical physics, Vol. 59 (Elsevier, 2010) pp. 223–263

    work page 2010

  35. [36]

    K. E. Dorfman, F. Schlawin, and S. Mukamel, Nonlinear optical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045008 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [37]

    M. A. Marques and E. K. Gross, Time-dependent density functional theory, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.55, 427 (2004)

    work page 2004

  37. [38]

    Vergari, F

    F. Vergari, F. Mazza, A. Hosseinnia, and M. Marrocco, Diagrammatic schemes for nonlinear optical interactions, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [39]

    Mukamel,Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy, Oxford series in optical and imaging sciences (Oxford University Press, 1995)

    S. Mukamel,Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy, Oxford series in optical and imaging sciences (Oxford University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  39. [40]

    Sutherland and R

    R. Sutherland and R. Srinivas, Universal hybrid quantum computing in trapped ions, Physical Review A104, 032609 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [41]

    Ackerhalt and K

    J. Ackerhalt and K. Rza˙ zewski, Heisenberg-picture operator perturbation theory, Physical Review A12, 2549 (1975)

    work page 1975

  41. [42]

    Franson and M

    J. Franson and M. M. Donegan, Perturbation theory for quantum-mechanical observables, Physical Review A65, 052107 (2002)

    work page 2002

  42. [43]

    F. M. Fern´ andez, Perturbation theory for heisenberg operators, Physical Review A67, 022104 (2003)

    work page 2003

  43. [44]

    Blais, R.-S

    A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 69, 062320 (2004)

    work page 2004

  44. [45]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Physical review93, 99 (1954)

    work page 1954

  45. [46]

    Larson and T

    J. Larson and T. Mavrogordatos,The Jaynes–Cummings model and its descendants: modern research directions(IoP Publishing, 2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [47]

    Meguebel, M

    M. Meguebel, M. Federico, L. Garbe, N. Belabas, and N. Fabre, Transitions as the native objects of dispersive light-matter dynamics, (2026)

    work page 2026

  47. [48]

    J. A. Gyamfi, Fundamentals of quantum mechanics in liouville space, European Journal of Physics41, 063002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [49]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano,Modern quantum mechanics(Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [50]

    B. C. Hall,Quantum theory for mathematicians(Springer, 2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [51]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg,Atom-photon interactions: basic processes and applications(John Wiley & Sons, 2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [52]

    Bloch and A

    F. Bloch and A. Siegert, Magnetic resonance for nonrotating fields, Physical Review57, 522 (1940)

    work page 1940

  52. [53]

    Forn-D´ ıaz, J

    P. Forn-D´ ıaz, J. Lisenfeld, D. Marcos, J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, E. Solano, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, Observation of the bloch-siegert shift in a qubit-oscillator system in the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 237001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [54]

    K. K. Ma and C. Law, Three-photon resonance and adiabatic passage in the large-detuning rabi model, Physical Review A92, 023842 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [55]

    Q. Xie, H. Zhong, M. T. Batchelor, and C. Lee, The quantum rabi model: solution and dynamics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50, 113001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [56]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 025005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [57]

    Zueco, G

    D. Zueco, G. M. Reuther, S. Kohler, and P. H¨ anggi, Qubit-oscillator dynamics in the dispersive regime: Analytical theory beyond the rotating-wave approximation, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics80, 033846 (2009)

    work page 2009

  57. [58]

    Ayyash and S

    M. Ayyash and S. Ashhab, Dispersive regime of multiphoton qubit-oscillator interactions, Physical Review A112, 023713 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [59]

    P. M. Chaikin, T. C. Lubensky, and T. A. Witten,Principles of condensed matter physics, Vol. 10 (Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1995)

    work page 1995

  59. [60]

    Lepp¨ akangas, J

    J. Lepp¨ akangas, J. Braum¨ uller, M. Hauck, J.-M. Reiner, I. Schwenk, S. Zanker, L. Fritz, A. V. Ustinov, M. Weides, and M. Marthaler, Quantum simulation of the spin-boson model with a microwave circuit, Physical Review A97, 052321 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [61]

    Parra-Rodriguez, E

    A. Parra-Rodriguez, E. Rico, E. Solano, and I. Egusquiza, Quantum networks in divergence-free circuit qed, Quantum Science and Technology3, 024012 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [62]

    Meguebel, M

    M. Meguebel, M. Federico, S. Felicetti, N. Belabas, and N. Fabre, Generation of frequency entanglement with an effective quantum dot-waveguide two-photon quadratic interaction, Optica Quantum3, 617 (2025)

    work page 2025

  62. [63]

    Huang, J

    L. Huang, J. Luneau, J. Schirk, F. Wallner, C. M. Schneider, S. Filipp, K. Liegener, and P. Rabl, Theory of multiphoton processes for applications in quantum control, Physical Review A113, 032620 (2026)

    work page 2026

  63. [64]

    Gu´ erin and H.-R

    S. Gu´ erin and H.-R. Jauslin, Control of quantum dynamics by laser pulses: Adiabatic floquet theory, Advances in Chemical Physics125, 147 (2003). 34

    work page 2003

  64. [65]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system, Reviews of Modern Physics59, 1 (1987)

    work page 1987

  65. [66]

    J. J. G. Ripoll,Quantum information and quantum optics with superconducting circuits(Cambridge University Press, 2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [67]

    B˘ az˘ avan, S

    O. Bazavan, S. Saner, D. Webb, E. Ainley, P. Drmota, D. Nadlinger, G. Araneda, D. Lucas, C. Ballance, and R. Srinivas, Squeezing, trisqueezing, and quadsqueezing in a spin-oscillator system (2024), arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05471

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [68]

    Appel,Math´ ematiques pour la physique et les physiciens(H & K, 2002)

    W. Appel,Math´ ematiques pour la physique et les physiciens(H & K, 2002)

    work page 2002

  68. [69]

    KREYSZIG, Advanced engineering mathematics (2021)

    E. KREYSZIG, Advanced engineering mathematics (2021)

    work page 2021

  69. [70]

    Blanchard and E

    P. Blanchard and E. Br¨ uning,Mathematical methods in Physics: Distributions, Hilbert space operators, variational methods, and applications in quantum physics, Vol. 69 (Birkh¨ auser, 2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [71]

    W. Shao, C. Wu, and X.-L. Feng, Generalized james’ effective hamiltonian method, Physical Review A95, 032124 (2017)

    work page 2017

  71. [72]

    generalized james’ effective hamiltonian method

    W. Rosado and I. Arraut, Comment on “generalized james’ effective hamiltonian method”, Physical Review A108, 066201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [73]

    J. C. Garrison and R. Y. Chiao,Quantum Optics(Oxford University Press, 2014)

    work page 2014