pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14672 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 💻 cs.LG

Recognition: unknown

AQKA: Active Quantum Kernel Acquisition Under a Shot Budget

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords emphkernelquantumhardwaremathrmsqrttextttacquisition
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Estimating an $N \times N$ quantum kernel from circuit fidelities requires $\Theta(N^2 S)$ measurement shots, the dominant bottleneck for deployment on near-term hardware. Existing budget-saving methods (Nystr\"om-QKE, ShoFaR, kernel-target alignment) sub-sample \emph{which} entries to measure but allocate shots \emph{uniformly} within their chosen subset, ignoring how much each entry drives the downstream classifier. We close this gap with two contributions. \textbf{First, a complete regime decomposition} for shot-budgeted quantum kernel learning: a principled menu of when each allocator wins. Our method, \emph{AQKA}, dominates the budget-limited regime ($B \lesssim 16 n_{\mathrm{pairs}}$) on sparse-sensitivity KRR, with the gap \emph{growing} from $+8$ to $+25$ pts over uniform as $N$ scales $225{\to}1000$ and reaching $+26$--$32$ pts on an \texttt{ibm\_pittsburgh} (156-qubit Heron) hardware kernel; Nystr\"om-QKE wins at saturating budgets on planted-sparse via low-rank reconstruction; ShoFaR is competitive only at extreme low budgets. \textbf{Second, a closed-form pair-level acquisition theory}: $s_{ij}^{\star} \propto |g_{ij}|\sqrt{K_{ij}(1-K_{ij})}$ with explicit gradient $g_{ij}$ for KRR (Lemma~1, $|\beta_i\alpha_j+\beta_j\alpha_i|\sqrt{K_{ij}(1-K_{ij})}$) and SVM via the envelope theorem ($|\eta_i^*\eta_j^*|\sqrt{K_{ij}(1-K_{ij})}$); a \emph{corrected} sparsity-aware Cauchy--Schwarz rate $\rho \le 2m/N$ matching empirics (vs.\ the naive $m^2/N^2$); an explicit-constant plug-in regret bound (Theorem~2); and a tighter SVM ceiling $\rho^{\mathrm{SVM}} \le m_{\mathrm{sv}}^2/N^2$. We close with the first multi-seed live online adaptive shot allocation on quantum hardware: $+17.0 \pm 4.8$ pts at $N{=}20$ on \texttt{ibm\_aachen} ($3.5\sigma$, 5 seeds), with the advantage holding at $N{=}30$ at higher budget on \texttt{ibm\_berlin} ($+14.0 \pm 8.5$ pts, 5 seeds).

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.