pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16313 · v1 · pith:UUKJF3VPnew · submitted 2026-05-04 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.app-ph

Particulate analysis of post-thermal runaway soot of Li-ion battery using X-ray computed tomography

Avtar Singh , Donal P. Finegan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 00:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords lithium-ion batterythermal runawaysoot particlesNano-CTX-ray computed tomographycore-shell structurecarcinogenic materialshealth risks
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nano-CT imaging detects core-shell structures in battery soot with thin carcinogenic surface layers that mass-based methods overlook.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines soot particles produced by thermal runaway in lithium-ion batteries and focuses on their potential health hazards when inhaled. It demonstrates that X-ray computed tomography provides three-dimensional views of particle shape, size, and distribution, revealing core-shell forms where a thin outer shell may contain carcinogenic materials. Traditional techniques such as X-ray diffraction only measure the overall mass fraction of these substances, which tends to be very small. The work argues that even trace amounts of such materials on particle surfaces can still create serious inhalation risks that affect internal organ function. This leads to the conclusion that better particulate characterization is needed to guide safety regulations and respiratory protection.

Core claim

The microstructural characteristics of soot generated during thermal runaway events in lithium-ion batteries have been examined using Nano-CT, which reveals core-shell structures containing thin shells of carcinogenic materials. In contrast to X-ray diffraction, which can only quantify the minimal mass fraction of these hazardous phases, the surface location of even small amounts on carbonaceous particles creates significant health risks upon inhalation that may compromise internal organ function. This research underscores the need for deeper understanding of particulate composition to inform safety regulations and respiratory protection measures.

What carries the argument

Nano-CT three-dimensional imaging that resolves particle morphology and identifies core-shell structures with thin surface shells.

If this is right

  • Detailed three-dimensional analysis of soot particle shape, size, and distribution becomes possible.
  • Core-shell structures with thin potentially hazardous shells can be identified that mass measurements miss.
  • Even minimal surface fractions of carcinogenic materials on particles create inhalation hazards.
  • Improved understanding of particulate composition supports updated safety regulations and protection guidelines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Pairing Nano-CT with chemical analysis methods could confirm the exact makeup of the observed shells.
  • The imaging approach might be applied to particulates released during other high-temperature battery or energy-storage failures.
  • Design changes in batteries that reduce formation of such surface-coated soot could lower overall exposure risks.

Load-bearing premise

The thin shells observed in the Nano-CT images consist of carcinogenic materials, even without direct compositional measurements to confirm their identity.

What would settle it

Elemental mapping or spectroscopy of the same soot particles that finds no carcinogenic compounds in the thin shells would falsify the health-risk interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16313 by Avtar Singh, Donal P. Finegan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Workflow to characterize the microstructure of soot generated during a thermal runaway event in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Classification of particulates based on the X-ray computed tomography imaging of soot generated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The microstructural characteristics of soot generated during thermal runaway events in lithium-ion batteries have been examined, with a focus on the associated health risks. X-ray computed tomography (Nano-CT) offers advanced 3D imaging for accurate analysis of particle shape, size, and distribution. Its primary benefit is the detection of core-shell structures that contain thin shell of carcinogenic materials. In contrast, traditional techniques like X-ray diffraction can only quantify the mass fraction of these hazardous phases, which is often minimal. Nevertheless, even a small mass fraction of carcinogenic materials on carbonaceous surfaces poses significant health risks when inhaled, potentially compromising internal organ function. This research underscores the need for a deeper understanding of particulate composition to inform safety regulations and respiratory protection measures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines soot particles generated during thermal runaway in Li-ion batteries using X-ray computed tomography (Nano-CT) for 3D microstructural analysis of particle shape, size, and distribution. It emphasizes the technique's ability to detect core-shell morphologies with thin shells of carcinogenic materials, contrasting this with bulk techniques like XRD that only quantify mass fractions, and argues that even minimal surface fractions pose inhalation health risks.

Significance. If validated, the work could contribute to understanding particulate hazards from battery failures and support improved safety regulations, but the absence of compositional data or validation against standards means the health-risk conclusions rest on unverified assumptions about shell chemistry rather than demonstrated results.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The central claim that Nano-CT detects 'core-shell structures that contain thin shell of carcinogenic materials' and that 'even a small mass fraction of carcinogenic materials on carbonaceous surfaces poses significant health risks' lacks supporting evidence; no elemental mapping, spectroscopy, or reference to known battery soot chemistry is provided to identify the shells, rendering the carcinogenic label and risk assessment unsupported by the imaging data alone.
  2. The manuscript supplies no quantitative metrics (e.g., shell thickness distributions, particle size statistics with error bars), sample preparation details, or comparison to known standards, which undermines claims of 'accurate analysis' and 'advanced 3D imaging' benefits over conventional methods.
minor comments (1)
  1. Abstract: Grammatical issue in 'thin shell of carcinogenic materials' should be revised for clarity and consistency with plural usage elsewhere.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback. We address the major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript while remaining faithful to the scope of the Nano-CT imaging study.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The central claim that Nano-CT detects 'core-shell structures that contain thin shell of carcinogenic materials' and that 'even a small mass fraction of carcinogenic materials on carbonaceous surfaces poses significant health risks' lacks supporting evidence; no elemental mapping, spectroscopy, or reference to known battery soot chemistry is provided to identify the shells, rendering the carcinogenic label and risk assessment unsupported by the imaging data alone.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract phrasing requires clarification to avoid implying direct chemical identification from the imaging alone. The Nano-CT data demonstrate core-shell morphologies whose thin shells are consistent with known products of Li-ion battery thermal runaway. The health-risk statement is grounded in the general literature on inhalation hazards of such particulates rather than new compositional measurements. In revision we will rephrase the abstract to emphasize morphological detection and add explicit citations to prior studies on the chemical composition of battery soot (including carcinogenic species) in the introduction and discussion sections. This will make the basis for the claims transparent without overstating the present results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript supplies no quantitative metrics (e.g., shell thickness distributions, particle size statistics with error bars), sample preparation details, or comparison to known standards, which undermines claims of 'accurate analysis' and 'advanced 3D imaging' benefits over conventional methods.

    Authors: We accept that additional quantitative and methodological detail is needed. The revised manuscript will incorporate: particle-size and shell-thickness histograms with mean values, standard deviations, and error bars extracted from the Nano-CT reconstructions; expanded experimental sections describing sample collection, mounting, and imaging parameters; and a dedicated comparison subsection that contrasts the 3D morphological information obtained by Nano-CT with the mass-fraction limitations of XRD and other bulk techniques, including reference to relevant particle-analysis standards where applicable. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct elemental mapping or spectroscopic data confirming the chemical identity of the shells were not acquired in this study; the work is limited to microstructural imaging and therefore cannot supply new compositional validation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational imaging with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The manuscript is an observational study using Nano-CT to image soot particle morphology and report core-shell structures. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains are present. Claims about carcinogenic content and health risks are interpretive statements resting on external assumptions rather than any internal mathematical reduction or self-citation loop. The work is self-contained as descriptive imaging analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an experimental imaging study; no free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are introduced in the provided abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Nano-CT can resolve thin core-shell structures in soot particles and identify them as containing carcinogenic material
    Invoked as the primary benefit of the technique in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5659 in / 1089 out tokens · 57345 ms · 2026-05-21T00:09:54.248601+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A review of lithium-ion battery safety concerns: The issues, strategies, and testing standards.Journal of Energy Chemistry, 59:83–99, 2021

    Yuqing Chen, Yuqiong Kang, Yun Zhao, Li Wang, Jilei Liu, Yanxi Li, Zheng Liang, Xiangming He, Xing Li, Naser Tavajohi, et al. A review of lithium-ion battery safety concerns: The issues, strategies, and testing standards.Journal of Energy Chemistry, 59:83–99, 2021

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    A comprehensive review of lithium-ion battery safety issues and fault diagnosis strategies throughout the entire lifecycle

    Lei Yao, Chang Yu, Yanqiu Xiao, Guangzhen Cui, Zhigen Fei, and Changhui Qu. A comprehensive review of lithium-ion battery safety issues and fault diagnosis strategies throughout the entire lifecycle. Journal of Energy Storage, 136:118447, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Fault evolution mechanism for lithium-ion battery energy storage system under multi-levels and multi-factors.Journal of Energy Storage, 80:110226, 2024

    Shuang Song, Xisheng Tang, Yushu Sun, Jinzhu Sun, Fu Li, Man Chen, Qikai Lei, Wanzhou Sun, Zhichao He, and Liqiang Zhang. Fault evolution mechanism for lithium-ion battery energy storage system under multi-levels and multi-factors.Journal of Energy Storage, 80:110226, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    The role of structural defects in commercial lithium-ion batteries.Cell Reports Physical Science, 2(9), 2021

    Guannan Qian, Federico Monaco, Dechao Meng, Sang-Jun Lee, Guibin Zan, Jizhou Li, Dmitry Karpov, Sheraz Gul, David Vine, Benjamin Stripe, et al. The role of structural defects in commercial lithium-ion batteries.Cell Reports Physical Science, 2(9), 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    How safe are li-ion batteries?Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 170(11):110508, 2023

    KM Abraham. How safe are li-ion batteries?Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 170(11):110508, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    A review of safety strategies of a li-ion battery.Journal of Power Sources, 478:228649, 2020

    Pius Victor Chombo and Yossapong Laoonual. A review of safety strategies of a li-ion battery.Journal of Power Sources, 478:228649, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Safetyriskassessmentmethodforthermalabuseoflithium-ionbatterypackbasedonmultiphysics simulation and improved bisection method.Energy, 264:126228, 2023

    Quan Xia, Yi Ren, Zili Wang, Dezhen Yang, Peiyu Yan, Zeyu Wu, Bo Sun, Qiang Feng, and Cheng Qian. Safetyriskassessmentmethodforthermalabuseoflithium-ionbatterypackbasedonmultiphysics simulation and improved bisection method.Energy, 264:126228, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Events with smoke, fire, extreme heat or explosion involving lithium batteries

    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Office of Security, and Hazardous Materials Safety. Events with smoke, fire, extreme heat or explosion involving lithium batteries. Battery Incident Chart.https: //www.faa.gov/hazmat/resources/lithium_batteries/incidents, 2026. [Online; Accessed April 9, 2026]

    work page 2026

  9. [9]

    Battery fire explosion hazard - safety alert.https://www

    Mine Safety and Health Administration. Battery fire explosion hazard - safety alert.https://www. msha.gov/battery-fire-explosion-hazard-safety-alert, 2024. [Online; Accessed April 9, 2026]

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Missouri fire highlights unique dangers of battery recycling.https://www.nfpa

    Angelo Verzoni. Missouri fire highlights unique dangers of battery recycling.https://www.nfpa. org/news-blogs-and-articles/blogs/2024/11/01/missouri-battery-plant-fire, 2024. [Online; Accessed April 9, 2026]. 5

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Hongji Kim Daewoung Kim and Hyunsu Yim. Blaze at south korea lithium battery plant kills 22 workers.https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/ about-20-bodies-found-after-fire-south-korea-battery-plant-yonhap-reports-2024-06-24/,

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    [Online; Accessed April 9, 2026]

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    Moss landing vistra battery fire response.https://www.epa.gov/ca/ moss-landing-vistra-battery-fire, 2025

    EPA in California. Moss landing vistra battery fire response.https://www.epa.gov/ca/ moss-landing-vistra-battery-fire, 2025. [Online; Accessed April 9, 2026]

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Are lithium ion cells intrinsically safe?IEEE transactions on industry applications, 49(6):2451–2460, 2013

    Thomas H Dubaniewicz and Joseph P DuCarme. Are lithium ion cells intrinsically safe?IEEE transactions on industry applications, 49(6):2451–2460, 2013

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Battery safety and fire prevention in mining operations.https:// mshasafetyservices.com/battery-safety-and-fire-prevention-in-mining-operations/, 2025

    MSHA Safety Services. Battery safety and fire prevention in mining operations.https:// mshasafetyservices.com/battery-safety-and-fire-prevention-in-mining-operations/, 2025. [Online; Accessed April 9, 2026]

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Identification and quantification of gases emitted during abuse tests by overcharge of a commercial li-ion battery.Journal of power sources, 389:106–119, 2018

    Y Fernandes, A Bry, and S De Persis. Identification and quantification of gases emitted during abuse tests by overcharge of a commercial li-ion battery.Journal of power sources, 389:106–119, 2018

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Analysis of gas release during the process of thermal runaway of lithium-ion batteries with three different cathode materials.Journal of Energy Storage, 50:104302, 2022

    Zhuangzhuang Jia, Peng Qin, Zheng Li, Zesen Wei, Kaiqiang Jin, Lihua Jiang, and Qingsong Wang. Analysis of gas release during the process of thermal runaway of lithium-ion batteries with three different cathode materials.Journal of Energy Storage, 50:104302, 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Lithium-ion battery explosion aerosols: Morphology and elemental composition

    Teresa L Barone, Thomas H Dubaniewicz, Sherri A Friend, Isaac A Zlochower, Aleksandar D Bugarski, and Naseem S Rayyan. Lithium-ion battery explosion aerosols: Morphology and elemental composition. Aerosol Science and Technology, 55(10):1183–1201, 2021

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Decoupling of heat generated from ejected and non-ejected contents of 18650- format lithium-ion cells using statistical methods.Journal of Power Sources, 415:207–218, 2019

    William Q Walker, John J Darst, Donal P Finegan, Gary A Bayles, Kenneth L Johnson, Eric C Darcy, and Steven L Rickman. Decoupling of heat generated from ejected and non-ejected contents of 18650- format lithium-ion cells using statistical methods.Journal of Power Sources, 415:207–218, 2019

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Performance of commercial high energy and high power li-ion cells in jovian missions encountering high radiation environments, 2019

    Chris Iannello, Eric Darcy, Erik Brandon, John-Paul Ruiz, Keith Billings, Charlie Krause, and Rat- nakumar Bugga. Performance of commercial high energy and high power li-ion cells in jovian missions encountering high radiation environments, 2019

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    481.(1993) workplace atmospheres

    EN CEN. 481.(1993) workplace atmospheres. size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne particles, 1993

    work page 1993

  22. [22]

    ISO, 2006

    International Organization for Standardization.Air quality-Particle size fraction definitions for health- related sampling. ISO, 2006

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    DL Dahlstrom and AB Bloomhuff. Tlvs and beis: Based on the documentation of the threshold limit values for chemical substances, physical agents & biological exposure indices.ACGIH - American conference of governmental industrial hygienists, 2014

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Free radical activity of pm10: iron-mediated generation of hydroxyl radicals

    Kenneth Donaldson, David M Brown, Colin Mitchell, Miglena Dineva, Paul H Beswick, Peter Gilmour, and William MacNee. Free radical activity of pm10: iron-mediated generation of hydroxyl radicals. Environmental health perspectives, 105(Suppl 5):1285, 1997

    work page 1997

  25. [25]

    Generation of hydroxyl radicals byurbansuspendedparticulateairmatter.theroleofironions.Atmospheric Environment, 34(15):2379– 2386, 2000

    Athanasios Valavanidis, Anastasia Salika, and Anna Theodoropoulou. Generation of hydroxyl radicals byurbansuspendedparticulateairmatter.theroleofironions.Atmospheric Environment, 34(15):2379– 2386, 2000

    work page 2000

  26. [26]

    Interactions between ultrafine particles and transition metals in vivo and in vitro.Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 184(3):172–179, 2002

    Martin R Wilson, Janet H Lightbody, Ken Donaldson, Jill Sales, and Vicki Stone. Interactions between ultrafine particles and transition metals in vivo and in vitro.Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 184(3):172–179, 2002. 6

    work page 2002

  27. [27]

    Activation of nf-κb by pm10 occurs via an iron-mediated mechanism in the absence of iκb degradation.Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 166(2):101–110, 2000

    LA Jimenez, J Thompson, DA Brown, I Rahman, F Antonicelli, R Duffin, EM Drost, RT Hay, K Don- aldson, and W MacNee. Activation of nf-κb by pm10 occurs via an iron-mediated mechanism in the absence of iκb degradation.Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 166(2):101–110, 2000

    work page 2000

  28. [28]

    Toxicological profile for cobalt

    GA Public Health Service, Atlanta. Toxicological profile for cobalt. u.s. department of health and human services.Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2004

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    Nickel toxicology

    Alyssa Gates, Julian A Jakubowski, and Angela C Regina. Nickel toxicology. InStatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing, 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    StevenKSeilkopandAdrianaROller. Respiratorycancerrisksassociatedwithlow-levelnickelexposure: an integrated assessment based on animal, epidemiological, and mechanistic data.Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 37(2):173–190, 2003. 7

    work page 2003