pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17213 · v1 · pith:GESKQVW3new · submitted 2026-05-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · nucl-th

Identifying observable MeV lines from the decays of weak and main r-process isotopes in mergers

Maude Lariviere , Nicole Vassh , Yanwen Deng , Xilu Wang , Rebecca Surman This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 23:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE nucl-th
keywords r-processneutron star mergersgamma-ray linesRh-106MeV spectrumbeta decaynucleosynthesisTl-208
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:GESKQVW3 Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number? 
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{GESKQVW3}

Prints a linked pith:GESKQVW3 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

Rh-106 gamma-ray lines can distinguish weak r-process dominance in neutron star mergers from months to years after the event.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes MeV gamma-ray spectra from beta decays of isotopes freshly made in neutron star mergers, using nucleosynthesis models that vary nuclear masses, decay rates, fission yields, and astrophysical conditions for both main (A greater than 130) and weak (A less than 130) r-process paths. It introduces a search method to locate clear spectral peaks and attributes each peak to a dominant decaying isotope, then tabulates visibility time windows for every identified line. A central result is that the spectrum above roughly 1 MeV from a weak-r-process event matches the isolated Rh-106 decay spectrum across a long interval from about 0.2 to 17 years. The same approach shows that lines from Hf-181, Ta-182, Ta-184, and Re-188 can test differences among nuclear models, while the 2.6 MeV line from Tl-208 remains visible on year-long timescales despite early competition from Ga-72 and La-140.

Core claim

Using nucleosynthesis calculations that span distinct nuclear models and both main and weak r-process astrophysical conditions, the authors predict the time-dependent MeV gamma-ray emission from beta-decaying isotopes in mergers. Their peak-finding procedure isolates lines that stand out above the continuum and assigns each to a single isotope when that isotope supplies the dominant contribution. The calculations show that Rh-106 produces a spectrum above ~1 MeV that is identical to the full weak-r-process output from ~0.2 to ~17 years, while Hf-181, Ta-182, Ta-184, and Re-188 lines can separate nuclear-model variations. The 2.6 MeV Tl-208 line emerges consistently on year timescales, though

What carries the argument

A peak-search algorithm that scans predicted spectra, identifies statistically prominent features, and tests whether a single isotope supplies the bulk of the photons at that energy.

If this is right

  • Rh-106 emission offers a direct observational discriminator between main and weak r-process contributions on timescales of months to years.
  • Lines from Hf-181, Ta-182, Ta-184, and Re-188 can test which nuclear mass or beta-decay models are closer to reality.
  • The 2.6 MeV Tl-208 line is expected to be visible on year-long timescales across a wide range of calculation inputs.
  • Numerous additional isotopes are flagged as targets for both gamma-ray observations and laboratory nuclear measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future gamma-ray telescopes tuned to the MeV band could use these lines to classify the r-process flavor of individual merger events.
  • Detection or non-detection of the predicted Rh-106 window would constrain the fraction of weak r-process material ejected in mergers.
  • The same line list supplies concrete targets for nuclear experiments that aim to reduce uncertainties in the underlying mass and decay data.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen nucleosynthesis conditions and nuclear-physics variations produce gamma-ray spectra that match what actually occurs in real neutron-star mergers.

What would settle it

A measured post-merger gamma-ray spectrum taken between 0.2 and 17 years that shows no Rh-106-like shape above 1 MeV, or that lacks the predicted Tl-208 line on year timescales, would contradict the central predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17213 by Maude Lariviere, Nicole Vassh, Rebecca Surman, Xilu Wang, Yanwen Deng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The total emission spectrum from β-decay at 3 days for a neutron-rich astrophysical trajectory (Ye = 0.01, entropy s/k = 10, and expansion timescale τ = 12 ms) calcu￾lated with FRDM2012 nuclear inputs. We consider predicted spectra both with and without radiation transfer with ejecta expansion velocities of 0.1c (top panel) and 0.3c (bottom panel). The light-colored smaller stars highlight the peaks determ… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of predicted final isotopic abun￾dances at 1 Gyr given three different nuclear mass models (FRDM2012, HFB27, TF) and two distinct β-decay treat￾ments ((top) M¨oller et al. and (bottom) Marketin et al.) for the 1.2 - 1.4 M⊙ neutron star merger results from D. Radice et al. (2018) (assuming M0 neutrino treatment). The solar abundance data is taken from C. Sneden et al. (2008). model sets (FRDM2012… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of predicted final isotopic abun￾dances (assuming the FRDM2012 nuclear model) at 1 Gyr given all the weak r-process trajectories considered in Ta￾ble 3. therefore report on a total sample of 24 weak r-process and 45 main r-process calculations. We demonstrate the variation in overall isotopic abun￾dances across astrophysical outflows in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of predicted final isotopic abun￾dances at 1 Gyr for main (top) and weak (bottom) r-process cases given three different nuclear model inputs (TF, FRDM2012, HFB27) (the main r-process case shown here is for Ye = 0.01, s/k = 10, τ = 12 ms while the weak r-process case corresponds to Ye = 0.25, s/k = 32, τ = 12 ms). Red stars along the x-axis denote the mass numbers of isotopes reported in Tables 1… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of predicted final isotopic abun￾dances (assuming the FRDM2012 nuclear model) at 1 Gyr given all the main r-process trajectories considered in Ta￾ble 3. Each panel represents Ye variation results for the three entropies considered: (top) s/k = 10, (middle) s/k = 32, and (bottom) s/k = 75. abundances of key isotopes varies depending on nuclear model inputs, with numerous key abundance features su… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Total emission spectrum from 0.1 to 6 MeV com￾pared with individual contributions from (top) Rh-106 lines (here at 215 days using FRDM2012 and condition 5) and (bottom) Ga-72 lines (here at 10 days using FRDM2012 and condition 7). In both calculations solely weak r-process nu￾clei are produced, and the spectrum from ∼1 MeV beyond becomes identical to that of (top) Rh-106 for tens of years or (bottom) Ga-72… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Top) Total emission spectrum from 0.1 to 6 MeV compared to individual contributions from La-140 and Tl-208 at 17.5 days (assuming astrophysical condition Ye = 0.01, s/k = 10; shown after radiation transfer with a velocity 0.1c). This time shows when La-140 takes over emission in the 2.5-2.8 MeV range. (Bottom) Total emission spectrum along with individual contributions from Ga-72 and Tl-208. Here we show … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Top) The Tl-208/La-140 abundance ratio at 5 days for all the parametrized trajectories in the extended set. Results with the three nuclear models considered are labeled with H, T, or F. The cases with a signal longer than 5 days are in teal, those in yellow have a signal shorter than 5 days and in red are the cases which do not produce a Tl-208 signal on the order of days. (Bottom) Same as above, but at 1… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (Top) Individual abundance of La-140 and Tl-208 across time for the Ye = 0.01, s/k = 10 case given all three nuclear models (teal for FRDM2012, yellow for HFB27 and purple for TF). (Bottom) Ratio of Tl-208 to La-140 abun￾dances across time. The gray vertical line is a point of refer￾ence for 5 days while the horizontal line shows the abundance ratio of 5.5 × 10−5 found to be a threshold of sorts in [PITH_… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The evolution of the total light curve in the energy range of relevance for the 2.6 MeV line of Tl-208 for three distinct astrophysical conditions with Ye = 0.19: one for which actinides are strongly produced (s/k = 75, red), another with a level of actinides typical of merger dynamical ejecta (s/k = 10, blue), and a third with lower lead / actinide production (s/k = 32, yellow). Lightcurve calculations a… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Total emission spectrum from 0.1 to 8 MeV com￾pared to individual contributions from Tl-208 and prompt fission gamma emission at 500 days (assuming FRDM12 nuclear model and astrophysical condition Ye = 0.01, s/k = 10). Note the dominance of fission gammas over the reported lines from Sb-134 and I-136 around 6 MeV from the β decay of these isotopes (additionally the presence of these isotopes is ultimately… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Total emission spectrum from 0.1 to 8 MeV at both 0.5 days (left) and 5 days (right) for three different astrophysical conditions with distinct reach in mass number: (top) a strongly fission cycling case with Ye = 0.01, s/k = 10, (middle) the Ye = 0.19, s/k = 32 case which produces both Rb-88 and fissioning species, and (bottom) a weak r-process case with Ye = 0.29, s/k = 75 that never populates fissionin… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison between emission from β-decay and α-decay at two times ((left) 25000 days (68.5 years) and (right) 778,000 days (2131.5 years)) for the extremely neutron-rich, low entropy case (Ye = 0.01 and s = 10) which heavily populates actinide nuclei. The left panel shows the time where α-decay begins to dominate emission at low energies (< 0.5 MeV). The right panel shows when α-decay ceases to be the dom… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider predictions for the MeV gamma-ray spectrum emitted by the $\beta$ decays of freshly synthesized isotopes from a neutron star merger at timescales of relevance for post-merger (days) and remnant (years) emission. We develop a search algorithm to identify observable spectral peaks and then determine if a specific isotope has a dominant emission line producing the spectral feature. We predict emission spectra using nucleosynthesis calculations which consider nuclear models with distinct masses, $\beta$-decays, and fission properties as well as variations on main ($A>130$) and weak ($A<130$) $r$-process astrophysical conditions. We tabulate all lines from decaying isotopes that our procedure identifies and provide the predicted range in time over which each line could be visible. We find that Rh-106 presents a unique opportunity to distinguish between main and weak $r$-process emission, as our calculated spectrum above $\sim 1$ MeV for an event dominated by the weak $r$ process is identical to the Rh-106 emission spectrum from $\sim$ 0.2 to $\sim$17 years. We further find emission from species such as Hf-181, Ta-182, Ta-184, and Re-188 offers the potential to be able to distinguish between nuclear models. We investigate whether the 2.6 MeV strong gamma-ray line from Tl-208 is predicted to be robustly observable across calculation variations on both timescale of days and years. We find Tl-208 to consistently shine through on the order of years, though it can face competition from Ga-72 and La-140 at early times ($\sim$ days). We additionally highlight numerous isotopes of interest for observation and nuclear experiment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a peak-search algorithm to identify dominant MeV gamma-ray lines from beta decays of r-process isotopes synthesized in neutron star mergers. Nucleosynthesis calculations are performed across multiple nuclear models (varying masses, beta-decay rates, and fission properties) and distinct astrophysical conditions for main (A>130) versus weak (A<130) r-process. The authors tabulate observable lines with predicted visibility time ranges and highlight that the weak r-process spectrum above ~1 MeV matches the Rh-106 decay spectrum from ~0.2 to ~17 years, while Tl-208 remains robust on yearly timescales (with early competition from Ga-72 and La-140) and species such as Hf-181, Ta-182, Ta-184, and Re-188 may distinguish nuclear models.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies concrete, observationally testable predictions that could distinguish main versus weak r-process contributions and test nuclear inputs in mergers, directly linking nucleosynthesis calculations to multi-messenger gamma-ray signatures. The systematic variation of nuclear and astrophysical inputs, together with the tabulated lines and time ranges, provides a useful resource for observers and experimental nuclear physicists.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results on Rh-106 and peak-search algorithm] The central claim for Rh-106 (abstract and results section) rests on the output of the peak-search algorithm matching the weak r-process spectrum above ~1 MeV to the isolated Rh-106 lines over 0.2–17 years. The manuscript should quantify how the algorithm resolves potential line overlaps or continuum contributions from other isotopes to confirm that the identity is not an artifact of the selection procedure.
  2. [Tl-208 robustness analysis] For the Tl-208 investigation (abstract), the claim of consistent observability on yearly timescales across model variations is load-bearing for the robustness conclusion. The paper should report the exact number of nuclear-model realizations and the quantitative spread in predicted line fluxes or visibility windows rather than qualitative consistency statements.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to a tabulation of all identified lines with visibility ranges, but the corresponding table or section number should be stated explicitly in the abstract or introduction for reader convenience.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the main versus weak r-process conditions (A>130 versus A<130) is clear in the abstract but should be restated with a brief reminder in the methods section when the astrophysical trajectories are first introduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results on Rh-106 and peak-search algorithm] The central claim for Rh-106 (abstract and results section) rests on the output of the peak-search algorithm matching the weak r-process spectrum above ~1 MeV to the isolated Rh-106 lines over 0.2–17 years. The manuscript should quantify how the algorithm resolves potential line overlaps or continuum contributions from other isotopes to confirm that the identity is not an artifact of the selection procedure.

    Authors: We agree that additional quantitative details on the peak-search algorithm would strengthen the manuscript. The algorithm generates the composite spectrum at each time step, identifies peaks above a 3-sigma threshold relative to the local continuum, and attributes a peak to a given isotope only when that isotope supplies the majority of the flux within the peak bin. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section that reports the fraction of peaks for which a single isotope dominates (>70% of the flux) and provides an explicit decomposition of the weak r-process spectrum at 1 yr showing that Rh-106 accounts for >85% of the intensity in the relevant features above 1 MeV with <10% residual continuum or overlap. These additions confirm that the Rh-106 identification is not an artifact of the selection procedure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Tl-208 robustness analysis] For the Tl-208 investigation (abstract), the claim of consistent observability on yearly timescales across model variations is load-bearing for the robustness conclusion. The paper should report the exact number of nuclear-model realizations and the quantitative spread in predicted line fluxes or visibility windows rather than qualitative consistency statements.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this request. Our nucleosynthesis grid comprises multiple combinations of mass models, beta-decay rates, and fission properties for both main and weak r-process trajectories. In the revised manuscript we now state the precise number of realizations performed and report the quantitative range of visibility windows and peak-flux variations for the 2.6 MeV Tl-208 line across the full set of calculations. These numbers are presented in the results section together with a brief summary of the maximum spread, thereby replacing the previous qualitative statement with concrete metrics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external nuclear models and controlled variations

full rationale

The paper's central results derive from nucleosynthesis calculations that vary nuclear masses, beta-decay rates, fission properties, and distinct main (A>130) versus weak (A<130) r-process astrophysical conditions, followed by application of a search algorithm to isolate dominant emission lines in the resulting spectra. These inputs are external to the paper and are not defined in terms of the target predictions (such as the Rh-106 distinction or Tl-208 robustness). No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The argument is self-contained against the stated methodology and external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on standard nuclear-physics inputs and astrophysical condition choices rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Nuclear models differing in masses, beta-decay rates, and fission properties provide a sufficient sampling of theoretical uncertainty for r-process yields.
    Invoked when the paper varies these models to test robustness of lines such as Tl-208.
  • domain assumption The chosen astrophysical conditions for main (A>130) and weak (A<130) r-process produce representative abundance patterns for merger ejecta.
    Used to generate the spectra that are then searched for peaks.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5862 in / 1533 out tokens · 40142 ms · 2026-05-19T23:26:40.489287+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Synthesis of the Elements in Stars , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 1957 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.547 1957

  2. [2]

    Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Using excitation-energy dependent fission yields to identify key fissioning nuclei in r-process nucleosynthesis. Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab0bea , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab0bea

  3. [3]

    Thallium-208: A Beacon of In Situ Neutron Capture Nucleosynthesis , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.052701 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.052701 2024

  4. [4]

    MeV Gamma Rays from Fission: A Distinct Signature of Actinide Production in Neutron Star Mergers , volume=

    Wang, Xilu and Vassh, Nicole and Sprouse, Trevor and Mumpower, Matthew and Vogt, Ramona and Randrup, Jorgen and Surman, Rebecca , year=. MeV Gamma Rays from Fission: A Distinct Signature of Actinide Production in Neutron Star Mergers , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , publisher=. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abbe18 , number=

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abbe18 2041

  5. [5]

    2025 , eprint=

    Gamma-Ray Spectra of R -Process Nuclei , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    and Wanajo, S

    Hotokezaka, K. and Wanajo, S. and Tanaka, M. and Bamba, A. and Terada, Y. and Piran, T. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2016 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw404 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw404 2016

  7. [8]

    and Fryer, Christopher L

    Korobkin, Oleg and Hungerford, Aimee M. and Fryer, Christopher L. and Mumpower, Matthew R. and Misch, G. Wendell and Sprouse, Trevor M. and Lippuner, Jonas and Surman, Rebecca and Couture, Aaron J. and Bloser, Peter F. and Shirazi, Farzane and Even, Wesley P. and Vestrand, W. Thomas and Miller, Richard S. , title =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/a...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab64d8 2020

  8. [9]

    2022 , month =

    Terada, Yukikatsu and Miwa, Yuya and Ohsumi, Hayato and Fujimoto, Shin-ichiro and Katsuda, Satoru and Bamba, Aya and Yamazaki, Ryo , title =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac721f , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac721f 2022

  9. [10]

    Radioactive $\gamma$-Ray Emissions from Neutron Star Mergers

    Radioactive Gamma-Ray Emissions from Neutron Star Mergers. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf961 , archivePrefix =. 1808.09833 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf961

  10. [11]

    2021 , month =

    Chen, Meng-Hua and Li, Li-Xin and Lin, Da-Bin and Liang, En-Wei , title =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1267 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1267 2021

  11. [12]

    , title =

    Tanaka, Masaomi and Kato, Daiji and Gaigalas, Gediminas and Rynkun, Pavel and Radžiūtė, Laima and Wanajo, Shinya and Sekiguchi, Yuichiro and Nakamura, Nobuyuki and Tanuma, Hajime and Murakami, Izumi and Sakaue, Hiroyuki A. , title =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa0cb , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa0cb 2018

  12. [13]

    2025 , month =

    Kuske, Jan and Arcones, Almudena and Reichert, Moritz , title =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf0f7 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf0f7 2025

  13. [14]

    Myers and W.J

    W.D. Myers and W.J. Swiatecki , keywords =. Nuclear properties according to the Thomas-Fermi model , journal =. 1996 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(95)00509-9 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(95)00509-9 1996

  14. [15]

    Möller and A.J

    P. Möller and A.J. Sierk and T. Ichikawa and H. Sagawa , keywords =. Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM(2012) , journal =. 2016 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002 2012

  15. [16]

    Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov nuclear mass model with 0.50 MeV accuracy based on standard forms of Skyrme and pairing functionals , author =. Phys. Rev. C , volume =. 2013 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.061302 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.061302 2013

  16. [17]

    and Kondev, F.G

    Wang, Meng and Huang, W.J. and Kondev, F.G. and Audi, G. and Naimi, S. , title =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddaf 2021

  17. [18]

    and Wang, M

    Kondev, F.G. and Wang, M. and Huang, W.J. and Naimi, S. and Audi, G. , title =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae 2021

  18. [19]

    2016 , note =

    General Description of Fission Observables: GEF Model Code , journal =. 2016 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2015.12.009 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2015.12.009 2016

  19. [20]

    Brown and M.B

    D.A. Brown and M.B. Chadwick and R. Capote and A.C. Kahler and A. Trkov and M.W. Herman and A.A. Sonzogni and Y. Danon and A.D. Carlson and M. Dunn and D.L. Smith and G.M. Hale and G. Arbanas and R. Arcilla and C.R. Bates and B. Beck and B. Becker and F. Brown and R.J. Casperson and J. Conlin and D.E. Cullen and M.-A. Descalle and R. Firestone and T. Gain...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001 2018

  20. [21]

    and Gallino, Roberto

    Sneden, Christopher and Cowan, John J. and Gallino, Roberto. Neutron-Capture Elements in the Early Galaxy. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145207

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145207 2008

  21. [22]

    and Bernuzzi, Sebastiano and Roberts, Luke F

    Radice, David and Perego, Albino and Hotokezaka, Kenta and Fromm, Steven A. and Bernuzzi, Sebastiano and Roberts, Luke F. , title =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf054 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf054 2018

  22. [23]

    and Martínez-Pinedo, Gabriel and Aramaki, Tsuguo and Burns, Eric and Hailey, Charles J

    Wu, Meng-Ru and Banerjee, Projjwal and Metzger, Brian D. and Martínez-Pinedo, Gabriel and Aramaki, Tsuguo and Burns, Eric and Hailey, Charles J. and Barnes, Jennifer and Karagiorgi, Georgia , title =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2593 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2593 2019

  23. [24]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101 2017

  24. [25]

    , keywords =

    A new versatile code for gamma-ray Monte-Carlo radiative transfer. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad515 , archivePrefix =. 2205.04450 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad515

  25. [26]

    Unified 1-D Simulations of Gamma-Ray Line Emission from Type Ia Supernovae

    Unified One-Dimensional Simulations of Gamma-Ray Line Emission from Type Ia Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/423235 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0406173 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/423235

  26. [27]

    Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Dual MeV gamma-ray and dark matter observatory - GRAMS Project. Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2019.07.002 , archivePrefix =. 1901.03430 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2019.07.002 2019

  27. [28]

    Science with e-ASTROGAM (A space mission for MeV-GeV gamma-ray astrophysics)

    Science with e-ASTROGAM. A space mission for MeV-GeV gamma-ray astrophysics. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2018.07.001 , archivePrefix =. 1711.01265 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2018.07.001 2018

  28. [29]

    McEnery, Julie and Horst, Alexander van der and Dominguez, Alberto and Moiseev, Alexander and Marcowith, Alexandre and Harding, Alice and Lien, Amy and Giuliani, Andrea and Inglis, Andrew and Ansoldi, Stefano and Stamerra, Antonio and Manousakis, Antonios and Strong, Andy and Bambi, Cosimo and Patricelli, Barbara and Baring, Matthew and Barrio, Juan Abel ...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.07558 2019

  29. [30]

    38th International Cosmic Ray Conference , year = 2024, month = sep, eid =

    The Compton Spectrometer and Imager. 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference , year = 2024, month = sep, eid =. doi:10.22323/1.444.0745 , archivePrefix =. 2308.12362 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.22323/1.444.0745 2024

  30. [31]

    , title =

    Wang, X. , title =. 2024 , month =

    work page 2024

  31. [32]

    , keywords =

    Gamma Rays as a Signature of r-process Producing Supernovae: Remnants and Future Galactic Explosions. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1298 , archivePrefix =. 2506.14991 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1298

  32. [33]

    , keywords =

    r-Process Radioisotopes from Near-Earth Supernovae and Kilonovae. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2d90 , archivePrefix =. 2105.05178 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2d90

  33. [34]

    Using Gamma Ray Monitoring to Avoid Missing the Next Milky Way Type Ia Supernova

    Using gamma ray monitoring to avoid missing the next Milky Way Type Ia supernova. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz993 , archivePrefix =. 1904.04310 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz993 1904

  34. [35]

    Catching Element Formation In The Act

    Catching Element Formation In The Act ; The Case for a New MeV Gamma-Ray Mission: Radionuclide Astronomy in the 2020s. , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1902.02915 , archivePrefix =. 1902.02915 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.02915 1902

  35. [36]

    , keywords =

    Propagation of statistical uncertainties of Skyrme mass models to simulations of r -process nucleosynthesis. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.101.055803 , archivePrefix =. 1901.10337 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.055803 1901

  36. [37]

    $\beta$-delayed fission in $r$-process nucleosynthesis

    -delayed Fission in r-process Nucleosynthesis. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaeaca , archivePrefix =. 1802.04398 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaeaca

  37. [38]

    Cobalt-56 gamma-ray emission lines from the type Ia supernova 2014J

    Cobalt-56 -ray emission lines from the type Ia supernova 2014J. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature13672 , archivePrefix =. 1405.3332 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature13672

  38. [39]

    M., Share, G

    Gamma-ray line emission from SN1987A. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/331416a0 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/331416a0

  39. [40]

    SPI observations of the diffuse 60Fe emission in the Galaxy

    SPI observations of the diffuse ^ 60 Fe emission in the Galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066982 , archivePrefix =. 0704.3895 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066982

  40. [41]

    , keywords =

    ^ 44 Ti ejecta in young supernova remnants. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037536 , archivePrefix =. 2004.12688 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037536 2004

  41. [42]

    Revisiting INTEGRAL/SPI observations of 44Ti from Cassiopeia A

    Revisiting INTEGRAL/SPI observations of ^ 44 Ti from Cassiopeia A. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525877 , archivePrefix =. 1505.05999 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525877

  42. [43]

    Large-scale evaluation of -decay rates of r -process nuclei with the inclusion of first-forbidden transitions. Phys. Rev. C , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.025805 , archivePrefix =. 1507.07442 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.025805

  43. [44]

    Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables , year = 1997, volume = 66, pages =

    Nuclear Properties for Astrophysical and Radioactive-Ion Beam Applications. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables , year = 1997, volume = 66, pages =. doi:10.1006/adnd.1997.0746 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1006/adnd.1997.0746 1997

  44. [45]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#235 , year = 2020, series =

    The Advanced Particle-astrophysics Telescope (APT) Mission Concept. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#235 , year = 2020, series =

    work page 2020

  45. [46]

    Cyburt, R. H. and Amthor, A. M. and Ferguson, R. and Meisel, Z. and Smith, K. and Warren, S. and Heger, A. and Hoffman, R. D. and Rauscher, T. and Sakharuk, A. , year=. The JINA REACLIB Database: Its Recent Updates and Impact on Type-I X-Ray Bursts , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/240 , number=

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/240