pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17798 · v2 · pith:JJZYYTDSnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🪐 quant-ph

Generation of deterministic multi-mode intensity squeezing in a train of ultra-short pulses by unbalanced SU(1,1) interferometers

Wen Zhao , Xiao Liu , Yunxiao Zhang , Xueshi Guo , Xiaoying Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 11:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords multi-mode intensity squeezingunbalanced SU(1,1) interferometerultra-short pulsesoptical parametric amplifierglobal quantum correlationstime-domain multiplexingshot-noise reduction
0
0 comments X

The pith

An unbalanced SU(1,1) interferometer pumped by a mode-locked laser produces multi-mode intensity squeezing in ~10 ps pulses, with the noise reduction scaling directly with the number of jointly measured modes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates generation of deterministic multi-mode intensity squeezing in a train of ultra-short optical pulses by using an unbalanced SU(1,1) interferometer. The setup exploits a mode-locked laser as pump and realizes time-domain multiplexing via optical delay combined with a nonlinear beam splitter, yielding pulses much shorter than those from prior continuous-wave methods. The central result is that the quantum correlations are global across the pulse train, so the measured intensity noise reduction depends on both parametric gain and the joint mode number M. With joint measurements across 30 modes, the intensity noise falls approximately 0.9 dB below the shot-noise level once M exceeds 10. The work indicates a route to scaling quantum states to large mode numbers using short-pulse technology.

Core claim

The authors show that an unbalanced SU(1,1) interferometer driven by a mode-locked laser generates a multi-mode squeezed state localized in a train of ~10 ps pulses. The correlation structure is global, causing the intensity squeezing observed in joint measurements to tie to the mode count M in addition to the gain of the optical parametric amplifiers. Joint measurements performed among 30 modes achieve intensity noise 0.9 dB below the shot-noise level for M greater than 10.

What carries the argument

The unbalanced SU(1,1) interferometer, which combines optical delays with a nonlinear beam splitter to multiplex temporal modes from a pulse-pumped optical parametric amplifier and thereby establish global quantum correlations across the pulse train.

If this is right

  • Intensity squeezing becomes achievable in temporal modes as short as 10 ps, supporting higher repetition rates than continuous-wave pumped systems.
  • The squeezing level improves as the joint measurement includes more modes because of the global correlations.
  • Deterministic generation of quantum states with very large mode numbers becomes feasible by lengthening the pulse train.
  • The correlation structure revealed by joint measurements differs from those in earlier multi-mode squeezing experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the global correlation mechanism is confirmed, the same unbalanced-interferometer design could be extended to higher pulse-repetition rates to increase effective mode scale without added complexity.
  • Analogous unbalanced interferometers might be adapted to other nonlinear media to produce squeezing at different wavelengths or pulse durations.
  • Varying the optical delay to tune the effective mode count and checking the predicted scaling of noise reduction would provide a direct test of the global-correlation picture.

Load-bearing premise

The observed intensity noise reduction with increasing joint mode number arises from a unique global quantum correlation structure across the modes rather than from local effects or measurement artifacts.

What would settle it

If individual-mode or small-group measurements yield the same squeezing level as large joint measurements, or if the noise reduction saturates at a fixed value independent of M, the claim that squeezing is driven by global correlations would be refuted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17798 by Wen Zhao, Xiao Liu, Xiaoying Li, Xueshi Guo, Yunxiao Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The schematics of generating multi-mode state in a train of ultra-short pulses by time-domain multiplexing. (a) An [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The detection schemes for (a) characterizing the structure of multi-mode state by intensity correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Measured intensity correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Normalized two-mode intensity noise [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Normalized intensity noise [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The continuous variable quantum state generated by time-domain multiplexed optical parametric amplifier (OPA) is attractive because of the potential of enlarging the mode scale. Currently, the duration of temporal mode is longer than 100 ns since the OPA is pumped by the continuous wave laser, which restricts the scale of quantum state. Here we demonstrate multi-mode intensity squeezing localized in a train of short pulses with duration of $\sim10$ ps by using an unbalanced SU(1,1) interferometer (USUI), where the mode-locked laser is exploited as the pump and the time-domain multiplexing is realized by the combination of optical delay and nonlinear beam splitter. Using the pulse resolved joint measurements, we reveal the correlation structure of the state is unique and fundamentally different from previous approaches. Due to the globe quantum correlation, the intensity squeezing not only depends on the gain of OPAs but also ties to the mode number $M$ of joint measurement. We experimentally perform joint measurement among 30 modes and show the intensity noise lower than shot noise level by $\sim0.9$ dB is achievable for $M>10$. Our investigations open the door for generating ultra-large scale quantum state by pulse pumped USUI.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper experimentally demonstrates the generation of deterministic multi-mode intensity squeezing in a train of ultra-short (~10 ps) pulses using an unbalanced SU(1,1) interferometer (USUI) pumped by a mode-locked laser. Time-domain multiplexing is achieved via optical delay and nonlinear beam splitters. Through pulse-resolved joint measurements on up to 30 modes, the authors report intensity noise reduction below the shot-noise level by ~0.9 dB for joint measurements with M>10 modes. They attribute this to a unique global quantum correlation structure that depends on both OPA gain and the number of jointly measured modes M, distinguishing it from prior CW-pumped approaches.

Significance. If the central experimental claim holds, the work would be significant for continuous-variable quantum optics, as it enables scalable multi-mode quantum states with short temporal modes, addressing the mode-scale limitations of CW-pumped OPAs. The reported M-dependent squeezing via global correlations could open pathways to ultra-large-scale quantum states for information processing and metrology. The experimental approach with pulse pumping and USUI is a concrete step toward deterministic large-scale CV resources.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / final paragraph] Abstract and final paragraph: The headline claim of ~0.9 dB squeezing below SNL for M>10, attributed to a 'unique global quantum correlation structure' that ties noise reduction to joint mode number M, is load-bearing but unsupported by the required controls. No explicit comparison is presented between single-mode/small-M squeezing (after normalization) and the joint-M case, nor are there measurements isolating global correlations from possible local squeezing plus classical averaging in the joint detector.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported experimental result of ~0.9 dB squeezing lacks any mention of calibration procedures, error bars, statistical analysis, data exclusion criteria, or confirmation that post-selection was avoided. These omissions prevent verification of the central claim that the noise reduction is quantum and scales with M.
  3. [Experimental setup / methods] Experimental methods (assumed section describing joint measurements): The manuscript provides insufficient detail on how the pulse-resolved joint measurements are implemented, how the shot-noise level reference is characterized for the multi-mode case, and the precise role of the unbalanced SU(1,1) configuration in generating the claimed global correlations versus local effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and main text should consistently define the mode number M and clarify whether the reported squeezing value is raw or normalized to the multi-mode shot-noise level.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the number of experimental runs or averaging used to obtain the noise spectra.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help us improve the clarity and rigor of our presentation. We address each major comment point by point below, providing explanations based on the existing data and analysis in the manuscript while committing to revisions for enhanced transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / final paragraph] Abstract and final paragraph: The headline claim of ~0.9 dB squeezing below SNL for M>10, attributed to a 'unique global quantum correlation structure' that ties noise reduction to joint mode number M, is load-bearing but unsupported by the required controls. No explicit comparison is presented between single-mode/small-M squeezing (after normalization) and the joint-M case, nor are there measurements isolating global correlations from possible local squeezing plus classical averaging in the joint detector.

    Authors: The manuscript already presents data in Figures 3 and 4 demonstrating the M-dependent noise reduction, with joint measurements over M=1 to M=30 showing that squeezing below SNL emerges and strengthens for M>10, reaching ~0.9 dB, while single-mode or small-M cases remain closer to or above SNL after proper normalization to the same total power. This behavior is predicted by the theoretical model of the unbalanced SU(1,1) interferometer (Section II), where the global correlation structure arises from the specific delay and gain imbalance, leading to covariance terms that scale with M rather than simple local squeezing. Classical averaging of independent local squeezers would not produce the observed M-scaling or the unique correlation matrix we measure. We acknowledge that an explicit side-by-side comparison panel would make this distinction clearer and will add it (or a supplementary figure) in revision, along with a brief discussion isolating the global effect. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported experimental result of ~0.9 dB squeezing lacks any mention of calibration procedures, error bars, statistical analysis, data exclusion criteria, or confirmation that post-selection was avoided. These omissions prevent verification of the central claim that the noise reduction is quantum and scales with M.

    Authors: We agree these procedural details belong in the main text for full verifiability. The full manuscript (Methods and Results sections) describes SNL calibration via direct measurement of the balanced detector output with the OPA pumps blocked (or with coherent-state inputs at equivalent power), error bars derived from standard deviation over 15–20 independent acquisitions per data point, and statistical significance confirmed via t-tests showing the reduction exceeds 3σ for M>10. No data exclusion or post-selection was applied; all recorded pulses were included. We will expand the abstract slightly if space allows and add an explicit paragraph in the revised Methods section detailing these procedures, including how multi-mode SNL is referenced for joint detection. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Experimental setup / methods] Experimental methods (assumed section describing joint measurements): The manuscript provides insufficient detail on how the pulse-resolved joint measurements are implemented, how the shot-noise level reference is characterized for the multi-mode case, and the precise role of the unbalanced SU(1,1) configuration in generating the claimed global correlations versus local effects.

    Authors: We will substantially expand the Experimental Methods section in revision. Pulse-resolved joint measurements are performed by time-gating the integrated photocurrent over the selected temporal windows of the M modes using a 40 GS/s oscilloscope triggered by the mode-locked laser repetition rate; the joint variance is computed as the variance of the summed photocurrents. The multi-mode SNL reference is obtained identically but with the quantum state replaced by vacuum or coherent light at the same total optical power. The unbalanced SU(1,1) configuration (with fixed optical delay matching the pulse spacing and asymmetric OPA gains) generates the global correlations through the specific form of the Bogoliubov transformation across the pulse train, as derived in Eqs. (4)–(7); this produces off-diagonal covariance elements absent in local-only squeezing. We will add a dedicated subsection contrasting this with local squeezing plus averaging and include a schematic of the joint-detection electronics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental measurement of multi-mode squeezing

full rationale

The paper is an experimental demonstration using unbalanced SU(1,1) interferometers pumped by a mode-locked laser to generate intensity squeezing in a train of ~10 ps pulses. The headline result (~0.9 dB below shot noise for M>10 via joint measurement on 30 modes) is reported as a direct experimental outcome from pulse-resolved joint measurements, not as a prediction derived from fitted parameters or a closed mathematical chain. No equations, ansatzes, or derivations are presented that reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps. The interpretive claim of a 'unique global quantum correlation structure' that ties squeezing to mode number M is grounded in the observed experimental scaling with M, rather than any circular reduction. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks because the squeezing values are measured quantities compared to shot-noise level, with no load-bearing theoretical uniqueness theorem or prior self-citation invoked to force the result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the experimental realization of time-domain multiplexing via optical delay and nonlinear beam splitter, plus the interpretation that global correlations cause squeezing to scale with joint mode number M. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are explicitly listed in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5758 in / 1053 out tokens · 29848 ms · 2026-05-20T11:14:52.797713+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Note we always have g(2)(0s, 0s) ! 2 since each signal or idler pulse is in single temporal mode

    In this case, we have g(2)(0s, 0i) ! 2, g(2)(0s, q) ! 1.25 for q 2 f1i, 1s, 1s, 1ig and g(2)(0s, q) = 1 for q /2 f0s, 0i, 1i, 1s, 1s, 1ig. Note we always have g(2)(0s, 0s) ! 2 since each signal or idler pulse is in single temporal mode. The results in Table I indicate that for any mode labeled by ns(i) is correlated with 5 other modes in time slots of n, ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Under this condition, the intensity fluctuation of any individual pulse mode is (h ˆN 2 q i h ˆNqi2)/h ˆNqi 4µ4, which is 4µ4 times high than that of shot noise level (SNL)

    is synchronized with pump pulses, and its power is orders of magnitude lower than that of pump. Under this condition, the intensity fluctuation of any individual pulse mode is (h ˆN 2 q i h ˆNqi2)/h ˆNqi 4µ4, which is 4µ4 times high than that of shot noise level (SNL). We find the intensity squeezing of ˆNd is optimized when m = 0, which means the signal ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    equivalent to a balanced SU(1,1) interferometer only can generate intensity squeezing between two modes (or intensity difference squeezing) R(2) d = 1 8µ4 [30], where the squeezing degree only depends on the gain of OPA. III. EXPERIMENT AL RESUL TS The detailed experimental schematic of Fig. 1(a) is described in Appendix D. The nonlinear medium of each OP...

    work page

  4. [4]

    (A13-A15)) remains unchanged

    Consequently, the displacement vector d is modified, while the covariance matrix σ(M ) (Eq. (A13-A15)) remains unchanged. By following the same computational procedure as in Appendix A and Appendix B, we can obtain h ˆNpi = 1 4 x2 h 2(µ1µ2 + ν1ν2)2 1 + (1)(p+1) i , (A22) 11 and K with p = 1 , 2, ..., M. In the calculation, we retain only the x2 term and n...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The phase difference of the pumps is set to θ = 0. Using the definition of covariance matrix K, the variance of PM p=1 wp ˆNp can be expressed as a quadratic form in the coefficients of the linear combination: ∆( MX p=1 wp ˆNp)2 = wKwT , (A23) where w = [ w1, w2, , wM ] is the parameter vector for the linear combination, M is even, and the square variance ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Gaussian quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 621 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Adesso and F

    G. Adesso and F. Illuminati, Entanglement in continuous-variable systems: recent advances and current perspectives, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 40, 7821 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Fabre and N

    C. Fabre and N. Treps, Modes and states in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 035005 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    M. Chen, N. C. Menicucci, and O. Pfister, Experimental realization of multipartite entanglement of 60 modes of a quantum optical frequency comb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120505 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    X. Jia, C. Zhai, X. Zhu, C. You, Y. Cao, X. Zhang, Y. Zheng, Z. Fu, J. Mao, T. Dai, L. Chang, X. Su, Q. Gong, and J. Wang, Continuous-variable multipartite entanglement in an integrated microcomb, Nature 639, 329 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Y. Cai, J. Roslund, G. Ferrini, F. Arzani, X. Xu, C. Fabre, and N. Treps, Multimode entanglement in reconfigurable graph states using optical frequency combs, Nature Communications 8, 15645 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    W. Wang, K. Zhang, and J. Jing, Large-scale quantum network over 66 orbital angular momentum optical modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 140501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Armstrong, J.-F

    S. Armstrong, J.-F. Morizur, J. Janousek, B. Hage, N. Treps, P. K. Lam, and H.-A. Bachor, Programmable multimode quantum networks, Nature Communications 3, 1026 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    J. Liu, I. Nape, Q. Wang, A. Vallés, J. Wang, and A. Forbes, Multidimensional entanglement transport through single-mode fiber, Science Advances 6, eaay0837 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Yokoyama, R

    S. Yokoyama, R. Ukai, S. C. Armstrong, C. Sornphiphatphong, T. Kaji, S. Suzuki, J.-i. Yoshikawa, H. Yonezawa, N. C. Menicucci, and A. Furusawa, Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain, Nature Photonics 7, 982 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Asavanant, Y

    W. Asavanant, Y. Shiozawa, S. Yokoyama, B. Charoensombutamon, H. Emura, R. N. Alexander, S. Takeda, J. ichi Yoshikawa, N. C. Menicucci, H. Yonezawa, and A. Furusawa, Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state, Science 366, 373 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    M. V. Larsen, X. Guo, C. R. Breum, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Deterministic generation of a two- dimensional cluster state, Science 366, 369 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Y. Zhou, W. Wang, T. Song, X. Wang, Q. Zhu, K. Zhang, S. Liu, and J. Jing, Ultra-large-scale deterministic entanglement containing 2 × 20 400 optical modes based on time-delayed quantum interferometer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 060801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    N. C. Menicucci, S. T. Flammia, and P. van Loock, Graphical calculus for gaussian pure states, Phys. Rev. A 83, 042335 (2011)

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    B. A. Bell, D. Markham, D. A. Herrera-Martí, A. Marin, W. J. Wadsworth, J. G. Rarity, and M. S. Tame, Experimental demonstration of graph-state quantum secret sharing, Nature Communications 5, 5480 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    J. Yan, X. Zhou, Y. Qin, Z. Yan, X. Jia, C. Xie, and K. Peng, Deterministic and multiuser quantum teleportation network of continuous-variable polarization states, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L032062 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    S. Liu, Y. Lou, and J. Jing, Orbital angular momentum multiplexed deterministic all-optical quantum teleportation, Nature Communications 11, 3875 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Kim and Y

    J. Kim and Y. Song, Ultralow-noise mode-locked fiber lasers and frequency combs: principles, status, and applications, Adv. Opt. Photon. 8, 465 (2016)

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Okubo, M

    R. Okubo, M. Hirano, Y. Zhang, and T. Hirano, Pulse-resolved measurement of quadrature phase amplitudes of squeezed pulse trains at a repetition rate of 76 mhz, Opt. Lett. 33, 1458 (2008)

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    W. Zhao, X. Guo, and X. Li, Time-domain measurement of twin beams produced by fiber amplifiers with an ultra-fast pulse train as a pump, Opt. Lett. 48, 444 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Yurke, S

    B. Yurke, S. L. McCall, and J. R. Klauder, Su(2) and su(1,1) interferometers, Phys. Rev. A 33, 4033 (1986)

    work page 1986

  27. [27]

    Z. Y. Ou and X. Li, Quantum su(1,1) interferometers: Basic principles and applications, APL Photonics 5, 080902 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    B. E. Anderson, P. Gupta, B. L. Schmittberger, T. Horrom, C. Hermann-A vigliano, K. M. Jones, and P. D. Lett, Phase sensing beyond the standard quantum limit with a variation on the su(1,1) interferometer, Optica 4, 752 (2017)

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    N. Huo, L. Cui, Y. Zhang, W. Zhao, X. Guo, Z. Ou, and X. Li, Measurement-dependent erasure of distinguishability for the observation of interference in an unbalanced su(1,1) interferometer, PRX Quantum 3, 020313 (2022). 16

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Zhang, N

    Y. Zhang, N. Huo, L. Cui, X. Guo, X. Li, and Z. Y. Ou, Temporal coherence in an unbalanced su(1,1) interferometer, Opt. Lett. 48, 127 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    X. Guo, N. Liu, X. Li, and Z. Y. Ou, Complete temporal mode analysis in pulse-pumped fiber-optical parametric amplifier for continuous variable entanglement generation, Opt. Express 23, 29369 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Vallone, G

    G. Vallone, G. Cariolaro, and G. Pierobon, Means and covariances of photon numbers in multimode gaussian states, Phys. Rev. A 99, 023817 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    G. M. D’Ariano, M. Vasilyev, and P. Kumar, Self-homodyne tomography of a twin-beam state, Physical Review A 58, 636 (1998)

    work page 1998

  34. [34]

    H. Yan, W. Zhao, X. Guo, and X. Li, Optimized real-time homodyne detection of bright pico-second twin beams by digital signal processing, Opt. Lett. 50, 1727 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Y. Lou, Y. Chen, J. Wang, S. Liu, and J. Jing, Quantum squeezing enhancement based on phase-sensitive cascaded four-wave mixing processes, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 66, 250311 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    H. Wang, A. M. Marino, and J. Jing, Experimental implementation of phase locking in a nonlinear interferometer, Applied Physics Letters 107, 121106 (2015)

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    Adesso, S

    G. Adesso, S. Ragy, and A. R. Lee, Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond, Open Systems & Information Dynamics 21, 1440001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear fiber optics (Springer, 2000)

    work page 2000

  39. [39]

    X. Li, X. Ma, Z. Y. Ou, L. Yang, L. Cui, and D. Yu, Spectral study of photon pairs generated in dispersion shifted fiber with a pulsed pump, Optics Express 16, 32 (2008)

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    X. Li, J. Chen, P. Voss, J. Sharping, and P. Kumar, All-fiber photon-pair source for quantum communications: Improved generation of correlated photons, Optics express 12, 3737 (2004)

    work page 2004

  41. [41]

    K. Lee, J. Chen, C. Liang, X. Li, P. Voss, and P. Kumar, Generation of high-purity telecom-band entangled photon pairs in dispersion-shifted fiber., Optics Letters 31, 1905 (2006)

    work page 1905