pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18091 · v1 · pith:XT4GTOOKnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum signatures and semiclassical limitations in the transmission of Fock states

Daniel Julian Nader This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 11:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum transmissionFock statesWigner function negativitysemiclassical limitationsKerr nonlinearitybarrier potentialphase-space structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fock states transmit through barriers with maximum probability set by their initial positive-energy fraction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares exact quantum evolution of displaced Fock states crossing an inverted-oscillator barrier against semiclassical trajectory ensembles. Exact results display short-time plateaus in transmission probability when regions of Wigner-function negativity interact with the barrier, features absent from the semiclassical runs. Adding a Kerr nonlinearity generates reflections that produce interference inside classically forbidden regions, again unreachable by semiclassical methods. The central result is that the highest transmission probability stays bounded by the fraction of the initial state that already has positive energy, a limit visible directly in the phase-space portrait of the Fock state. A sympathetic reader cares because the work isolates a concrete dynamical setting where states lacking a faithful classical representation expose the incompleteness of semiclassical approximations.

Core claim

Transmission of displaced Fock states through an inverted-oscillator barrier shows that semiclassical simulations reproduce the overall transmission probability but miss short-time plateaus caused when Wigner-function negativity crosses the barrier. A Kerr nonlinearity introduces reflections from nonlinear boundaries that drive interference into classically forbidden regions, an effect inaccessible to semiclassical approaches. The maximum transmission probability itself remains bounded by the initial positive-energy fraction and is therefore already encoded in the phase-space structure of the Fock states. Because Fock states cannot be faithfully represented within classical phase space, the

What carries the argument

The positive-energy fraction of the initial Fock state in phase space, which directly bounds the achievable transmission probability.

If this is right

  • Semiclassical trajectory methods will systematically omit the short-time transmission plateaus generated by Wigner negativity.
  • The transmission bound set by the positive-energy fraction persists even when Kerr nonlinearity adds forbidden-region interference.
  • Exact quantum propagation is required to resolve the dynamics while negativity regions cross the barrier.
  • Kerr media offer an experimental route to observe the quantum signatures that semiclassical models miss.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Comparable short-time quantum features may appear in other scattering problems that involve states possessing Wigner negativity.
  • High-resolution experiments in Kerr-coupled systems could directly measure the transmission plateaus and test the energy-fraction bound.
  • Semiclassical techniques may need explicit corrections for negativity to improve accuracy on short time scales.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical exact quantum dynamics and the semiclassical trajectory ensemble are computed with sufficient resolution that the reported short-time plateaus and interference patterns are not erased by uncontrolled approximations.

What would settle it

An exact quantum calculation in which the maximum transmission probability exceeds the initial positive-energy fraction, or a semiclassical ensemble that reproduces the short-time plateaus once resolution is increased.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18091 by Daniel Julian Nader.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Classical trajectories of the inverted oscillator with a small [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (Left column) Displaced Fock state D(α)|1⟩ with dis￾placement parameter α = 1 2 (−2 + 2i) at different times evolving in the inverted oscillator (1). (Right column) Histogram of the set of N = 105 points that replicate the Fock state according to the Gaus￾sian approximation (12). This approach is particularly advantageous for avoiding the direct evaluation of the Wigner function integral in (8), espe￾ciall… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the time evolution of the transmission prob￾ability P(q > 0,t) for an initial coherent state with displace￾ment parameter α = √ 1 2 (−3+2.5i). The probability increases smoothly over time and asymptotically approaches roughly P0(E > 0) = 0.308. The transmission probability from the TWA (13) is found to be in good agreement with the exact analytical result (17). At t = 4, the exact transmission proba￾… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the time evolution of the transmission prob￾ability P(q > 0,t) for different initial displaced Fock states. According to (2), displaced Fock states with the same dis￾placement parameter share the same mean energy. For the analysis we chose α = √ 1 2 (−3 + 2.5i). The agreement be￾tween the exact numerical results and the TWA method is good at short times. However, the exact dynamics display short-time… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Left column) Dynamics of the Wigner function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Probability P(q > 0,t) of finding the particle on the right side of the Kerr inverted oscillator, starting from displaced Fock states Dˆ(α)|n⟩. All initial states have ¯q = −3 and mean energy E¯ ≈ −0.79, below the barrier threshold. The solid red curve shows the transmission probability from the TWA method (13), black points denote the exact marginal probability (8), and the blue dashed line the probabilit… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: panel (a) shows the energy variance σH = ⟨Hˆ 2⟩ − ⟨Hˆ⟩ 2 of the initial displaced Fock states presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Variance σH of the Hamiltonian (3) and (b) Positive￾energy fraction P0(E > 0) for the initial states in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Volume of the absolute Wigner function in the clas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Transmission through potential barriers is a fundamental problem in quantum mechanics. While semiclassical methods can approximate certain aspects of transmission, they fail to capture the intrinsically quantum interference associated with Wigner-function negativity. We numerically study the transmission of displaced Fock states through an inverted-oscillator barrier, with and without a Kerr nonlinearity that offers a potential route to experimental realization. These states allow only an approximate classical description, since their characteristic Wigner-function negativity is absent in phase space. The semiclassical simulation reproduces the overall transmission but deviate from exact results and fail to capture short-time plateaus that arise when regions of Wigner-function negativity cross the barrier. With the Kerr nonlinearity, reflections from nonlinear boundaries drive interference into classically forbidden regions, an effect that is inaccessible to semiclassical approaches. We find that these interference effects do not alter the maximum transmission probability, which is bounded by the initial positive-energy fraction and therefore already encoded in the phase-space structure of the Fock states. Because Fock states cannot be faithfully represented within classical phase space, the transmission through a barrier reveals fundamental limitations of semiclassical approaches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically compares exact quantum dynamics to semiclassical trajectory ensembles for the transmission of displaced Fock states through an inverted-oscillator barrier, with and without Kerr nonlinearity. It reports that semiclassical methods reproduce overall transmission probabilities but fail to capture short-time plateaus that appear when regions of Wigner-function negativity cross the barrier. Kerr nonlinearity induces reflections that drive interference into classically forbidden regions, an effect inaccessible semiclassically. The maximum transmission is bounded by the initial positive-energy fraction visible in the Wigner function prior to propagation, a quantity already encoded in the phase-space structure of the Fock states. The work concludes that these observations reveal intrinsic limitations of semiclassical approaches for states without faithful classical phase-space representations.

Significance. If the numerical distinctions are robust, the paper supplies concrete evidence that Wigner negativity produces observable short-time signatures in barrier transmission that semiclassical ensembles miss, while also identifying a simple phase-space bound on maximum transmission. The Kerr case adds a potential experimental route via nonlinear media. These findings could help delineate the regime where semiclassical methods remain reliable in quantum optics and mesoscopic physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical Methods] Numerical Methods section: the manuscript provides no information on spatial grid size, time-step size, convergence tests, or boundary conditions for the exact quantum propagator (split-operator or equivalent). Because the central distinction between exact and semiclassical results rests on the visibility of short-time plateaus, uncontrolled discretization errors could either fabricate or suppress these features; the same applies to the number of trajectories and sampling procedure in the semiclassical ensemble.
  2. [Results on Kerr nonlinearity] Kerr nonlinearity results: the assertion that boundary reflections produce interference inside the forbidden region (and that this does not change the maximum transmission) is stated without quantitative support such as time-resolved Wigner snapshots or integrated probability measures at specific times. This leaves open whether the reported effect is numerically resolved or an artifact of the chosen barrier and Kerr parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the displacement amplitude and barrier height used, together with the precise definition of the positive-energy fraction extracted from the initial Wigner function.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should indicate the time window over which plateaus are observed and the ensemble size for each semiclassical curve to allow direct assessment of statistical significance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will incorporate the requested clarifications and supporting material in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical Methods] Numerical Methods section: the manuscript provides no information on spatial grid size, time-step size, convergence tests, or boundary conditions for the exact quantum propagator (split-operator or equivalent). Because the central distinction between exact and semiclassical results rests on the visibility of short-time plateaus, uncontrolled discretization errors could either fabricate or suppress these features; the same applies to the number of trajectories and sampling procedure in the semiclassical ensemble.

    Authors: We agree that the Numerical Methods section requires additional detail to ensure reproducibility and to rule out discretization artifacts in the short-time plateaus. In the revised manuscript we will specify the spatial grid size and spacing, the time-step size employed in the split-operator propagator, the results of convergence tests performed by varying both grid and time-step parameters, and the form of the absorbing boundary conditions used at the edges of the computational domain. For the semiclassical ensemble we will report the total number of trajectories and the precise Monte-Carlo sampling procedure from the initial Wigner function of the displaced Fock state. These additions will confirm that the reported distinctions between exact and semiclassical dynamics are robust. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on Kerr nonlinearity] Kerr nonlinearity results: the assertion that boundary reflections produce interference inside the forbidden region (and that this does not change the maximum transmission) is stated without quantitative support such as time-resolved Wigner snapshots or integrated probability measures at specific times. This leaves open whether the reported effect is numerically resolved or an artifact of the chosen barrier and Kerr parameters.

    Authors: We accept that the Kerr-nonlinearity discussion would benefit from explicit quantitative support. In the revision we will insert time-resolved Wigner-function snapshots at selected propagation times that illustrate the emergence of interference inside the classically forbidden region following boundary reflections. We will also add a supplementary figure showing the time-dependent integrated probability density in the forbidden region, thereby quantifying the effect and demonstrating that it is resolved for the chosen parameters. The claim that maximum transmission remains unchanged follows directly from the fact that it is bounded by the initial positive-energy fraction visible in the Wigner function; this bound is a static phase-space property and is unaffected by the subsequent Kerr-induced dynamics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: bound follows directly from input phase-space structure via numerics

full rationale

The paper reports a numerical study of Fock-state transmission through an inverted-oscillator barrier (with and without Kerr term) and states that the observed maximum transmission equals the initial positive-energy fraction visible in the Wigner function prior to evolution. This relation is presented as an empirical finding from exact quantum dynamics versus semiclassical ensembles rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction or a self-definitional equivalence. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain, imported uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggled via prior work; the central distinction between quantum plateaus and semiclassical failure is grounded in the computed trajectories and Wigner negativity crossing, which remain independent of the target bound. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard quantum mechanics and the Wigner-function representation; no new entities are postulated and no parameters appear to be fitted to the transmission data itself.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Quantum mechanics in the Wigner representation correctly describes the dynamics of displaced Fock states under the inverted-oscillator Hamiltonian with optional Kerr term.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the basis for both exact and semiclassical calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1400 out tokens · 26280 ms · 2026-05-20T11:07:40.181387+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    for Fock states, defined as Pn(q,p) = r 2 π exp (q2/2+p 2/2−n−1/2) 2 1/2 ,(12) wherenis the Fock state index. This distribution approxi- mates the Wigner function of the initial displaced Fock state and is used to generate the initial ensemble for TW A simula- tions, as illustrated in Figure 5. Within the TW A framework, only those phase-space points (qi,...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Merzbacher, The early history of quantum tunneling, Physics Today55, 44 (2002)

    E. Merzbacher, The early history of quantum tunneling, Physics Today55, 44 (2002)

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Hund, Zur deutung der molekelspektren

    F. Hund, Zur deutung der molekelspektren. i, Zeitschrift für Physik40, 742 (1927)

    work page 1927

  4. [4]

    Nordheim, Zur theorie der thermischen emission und der re- flexion von elektronen an metallen, Zeitschrift für Physik46, 833 (1928)

    L. Nordheim, Zur theorie der thermischen emission und der re- flexion von elektronen an metallen, Zeitschrift für Physik46, 833 (1928)

    work page 1928

  5. [5]

    Gamow, The quantum theory of nuclear disintegration, Na- ture122, 805 (1928)

    G. Gamow, The quantum theory of nuclear disintegration, Na- ture122, 805 (1928)

    work page 1928

  6. [6]

    G.-R. Feng, Y . Lu, L. Hao, F.-H. Zhang, and G.-L. Long, Ex- perimental simulation of quantum tunneling in small systems, Scientific Reports3, 2232 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    M. H. Devoret, J. M. Martinis, and J. Clarke, Measurements of macroscopic quantum tunneling out of the zero-voltage state of a current-biased josephson junction, Physical review letters55, 1908 (1985)

    work page 1908

  8. [8]

    Fiske and I

    M. Fiske and I. Giaever, Superconductive tunneling, Proceed- ings of the IEEE52, 1155 (1964). 9

    work page 1964

  9. [9]

    Ramos, D

    R. Ramos, D. Spierings, I. Racicot, and A. M. Steinberg, Mea- surement of the time spent by a tunnelling atom within the bar- rier region, Nature583, 529 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Zendra, F

    M. Zendra, F. Borgonovi, G. L. Celardo, and S. Gurvitz, Many- body tunneling in a double-well potential, Physical Review A 110, 062222 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Ferreira and G

    R. Ferreira and G. Bastard, Tunnelling and relaxation in semiconductor double quantum wells, Reports on Progress in Physics60, 345 (1997)

    work page 1997

  12. [12]

    Song, Localization or tunneling in asymmetric double- well potentials, Annals of Physics362, 609 (2015)

    D.-Y . Song, Localization or tunneling in asymmetric double- well potentials, Annals of Physics362, 609 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Braun and J

    D. Braun and J. Martin, Spontaneous emission from a two- level atom tunneling in a double-well potential, Physical Re- view A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics77, 032102 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    Hasegawa, Gaussian wavepacket dynamics and quantum tunneling in asymmetric double-well systems, Physica A: Sta- tistical Mechanics and its Applications392, 6232 (2013)

    H. Hasegawa, Gaussian wavepacket dynamics and quantum tunneling in asymmetric double-well systems, Physica A: Sta- tistical Mechanics and its Applications392, 6232 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    M. A. P. Reynoso, D. J. Nader, J. Chávez-Carlos, B. E. Ordaz- Mendoza, R. G. Cortiñas, V . S. Batista, S. Lerma-Hernández, F. Pérez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Quantum tunneling and level crossings in the squeeze-driven kerr oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 108, 033709 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Marthaler and M

    M. Marthaler and M. Dykman, Quantum interference in the classically forbidden region: A parametric oscillator, Physi- cal Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics76, 010102 (2007)

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    D. J. Nader, C. A. González-Rodríguez, and S. Lerma- Hernández, Avoided crossings and dynamical tunneling close to excited-state quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. E104, 064116 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Chen and J

    G. Chen and J. Liang, Unconventional quantum phase transition in the finite-size lipkin–meshkov–glick model, New Journal of Physics8, 297 (2006)

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Milburn, J

    G. Milburn, J. Corney, E. M. Wright, and D. Walls, Quantum dynamics of an atomic bose-einstein condensate in a double- well potential, Physical Review A55, 4318 (1997)

    work page 1997

  20. [20]

    Zöllner, H.-D

    S. Zöllner, H.-D. Meyer, and P. Schmelcher, Tunneling dy- namics of a few bosons in a double well, Physical Re- view A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics78, 013621 (2008)

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    Kluksdahl, A

    N. Kluksdahl, A. Kriman, and D. Ferry, Wigner function simu- lation of quantum tunneling, Superlattices and Microstructures 4, 127 (1988)

    work page 1988

  22. [22]

    K. G. Kay, Time-dependent semiclassical tunneling through barriers, Phys. Rev. A88, 012122 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    K. L. Jensen, J. L. Lebowitz, J. M. Riga, D. A. Shiffler, and R. Seviour, Wigner wave packets: Transmission, reflection, and tunneling, Phys. Rev. B103, 155427 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    C. S. Tautermann, A. F. V oegele, T. Loerting, and K. R. Liedl, An accurate semiclassical method to predict ground-state tun- neling splittings, The Journal of chemical physics117, 1967 (2002)

    work page 1967

  25. [25]

    Rastelli, Semiclassical formula for quantum tunnel- ing in asymmetric double-well potentials, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics86, 012106 (2012)

    G. Rastelli, Semiclassical formula for quantum tunnel- ing in asymmetric double-well potentials, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics86, 012106 (2012)

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    Aragón-Muñoz, G

    L. Aragón-Muñoz, G. Chacón-Acosta, and H. Hernandez- Hernandez, Effective quantum tunneling from a semiclassical momentous approach, International Journal of Modern Physics B34, 2050271 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Le Deunff, A

    J. Le Deunff, A. Mouchet, and P. Schlagheck, Semiclassical description of resonance-assisted tunneling in one-dimensional integrable models, Phys. Rev. E88, 042927 (2013)

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Hillery, R

    M. Hillery, R. F. O’Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals, Physics re- ports106, 121 (1984)

    work page 1984

  29. [29]

    Y . Lu, I. Strandberg, F. Quijandría, G. Johansson, S. Gas- parinetti, and P. Delsing, Propagating wigner-negative states generated from the steady-state emission of a superconducting qubit, Physical Review Letters126, 253602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Rahimi-Keshari, T

    S. Rahimi-Keshari, T. C. Ralph, and C. M. Caves, Sufficient conditions for efficient classical simulation of quantum optics, Physical Review X6, 021039 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Xiang, S

    Y . Xiang, S. Liu, J. Guo, Q. Gong, N. Treps, Q. He, and M. Walschaers, Distribution and quantification of remotely generated wigner negativity, npj Quantum Information8, 21 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Toscano, D

    F. Toscano, D. A. R. Dalvit, L. Davidovich, and W. H. Zurek, Sub-planck phase-space structures and heisenberg-limited mea- surements, Phys. Rev. A73, 023803 (2006)

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    Y . L. Lin and O. C. O. Dahlsten, Necessity of negative wigner function for tunneling, Phys. Rev. A102, 062210 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Chen and S

    C. Chen and S. Zhou, Insights into quantum tunneling via a phase-space approach, Phys. Rev. A109, 032227 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    I. F. Valtierra and A. B. Klimov, Tunneling currents in the hy- perbolic phase space, Entropy26, 639 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Ono, Phase-space consideration on barrier transmission in a time-dependent variational approach with superposed wave packets, Physics Letters B826, 136931 (2022)

    A. Ono, Phase-space consideration on barrier transmission in a time-dependent variational approach with superposed wave packets, Physics Letters B826, 136931 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Breitenbach, S

    G. Breitenbach, S. Schiller, and J. Mlynek, Measurement of the quantum states of squeezed light, Nature387, 471 (1997)

    work page 1997

  38. [38]

    Leonhardt and H

    U. Leonhardt and H. Paul, Measuring the quantum state of light, Progress in Quantum Electronics19, 89 (1995)

    work page 1995

  39. [39]

    A. I. Lvovsky, H. Hansen, T. Aichele, O. Benson, J. Mlynek, and S. Schiller, Quantum state reconstruction of the single- photon fock state, Physical Review Letters87, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.87.050402 (2001)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2001

  40. [40]

    J. Park, Y . Lu, J. Lee, Y . Shen, K. Zhang, S. Zhang, M. S. Zubairy, K. Kim, and H. Nha, Revealing nonclassicality be- yond Gaussian states via a single marginal distribution, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Science114, 891 (2017), arXiv:1702.01387 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [41]

    Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynam- ics, Annals of Physics325, 1790 (2010)

    A. Polkovnikov, Phase space representation of quantum dynam- ics, Annals of Physics325, 1790 (2010)

    work page 2010

  42. [42]

    Schachenmayer, A

    J. Schachenmayer, A. Pikovski, and A. M. Rey, Many-body quantum spin dynamics with monte carlo trajectories on a dis- crete phase space, Phys. Rev. X5, 011022 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    P. D. Drummond and C. W. Gardiner, Generalised p- representations in quantum optics, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and General13, 2353 (1980)

    work page 1980

  44. [44]

    J. F. Corney and M. K. Olsen, Non-gaussian pure states and positive wigner functions, Phys. Rev. A91, 023824 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Kenfack and K

    A. Kenfack and K. ˙Zyczkowski, Negativity of the wigner func- tion as an indicator of non-classicality, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics6, 396 (2004)

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    X.-B. Wang, T. Hiroshima, A. Tomita, and M. Hayashi, Quan- tum information with gaussian states, Physics reports448, 1 (2007)

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    Wielinga and G

    B. Wielinga and G. J. Milburn, Quantum tunneling in a kerr medium with parametric pumping, Phys. Rev. A48, 2494 (1993)

    work page 1993

  48. [48]

    Marti, U

    S. Marti, U. von Lüpke, O. Joshi, Y . Yang, M. Bild, A. Oma- hen, Y . Chu, and M. Fadel, Quantum squeezing in a nonlinear mechanical oscillator, Nature Physics , 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    X. He, Y . Lu, D. Bao, H. Xue, W. Jiang, Z. Wang, A. Roudsari, P. Delsing, J. Tsai, and Z. Lin, Fast generation of schrödinger cat states using a kerr-tunable superconducting resonator, Na- 10 ture communications14, 6358 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Barton, Quantum mechanics of the inverted oscillator poten- tial, Annals of Physics166, 322 (1986)

    G. Barton, Quantum mechanics of the inverted oscillator poten- tial, Annals of Physics166, 322 (1986)

    work page 1986

  51. [51]

    Yuce, Quantum inverted harmonic potential, Physica Scripta 96, 105006 (2021)

    C. Yuce, Quantum inverted harmonic potential, Physica Scripta 96, 105006 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Ullinger, M

    F. Ullinger, M. Zimmermann, and W. P. Schleich, The logarith- mic phase singularity in the inverted harmonic oscillator, A VS Quantum Science4(2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Albrecht, P

    A. Albrecht, P. Ferreira, M. Joyce, and T. Prokopec, Infla- tion and squeezed quantum states, Physical Review D50, 4807 (1994)

    work page 1994

  54. [54]

    S. Wang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Classical-quantum cor- respondence for inverted harmonic oscillator (2023), arXiv:2211.10078 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    Romatschke, Out-of-time-ordered-correlators for the pure in- verted quartic oscillator: classical chaos meets quantum stabil- ity, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 1 (2024)

    P. Romatschke, Out-of-time-ordered-correlators for the pure in- verted quartic oscillator: classical chaos meets quantum stabil- ity, Journal of High Energy Physics2024, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Maamache and J

    M. Maamache and J. R. Choi, Quantum-classical correspon- dence for the inverted oscillator, Chinese Physics C41, 113106 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    D. F. Walls and J. D. Harvey,Quantum Optics VI: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Quantum Optics, Ro- torua, New Zealand, January 24–28, 1994, V ol. 77 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    work page 1994

  58. [58]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, Engineering the quantum states of light in a kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving, npj Quantum Information3, 18 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Chávez-Carlos, T

    J. Chávez-Carlos, T. L. Lezama, R. G. Cortiñas, J. Venkatra- man, M. H. Devoret, V . S. Batista, F. Pérez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Spectral kissing and its dynamical consequences in the squeeze-driven kerr oscillator, npj Quantum Information9, 76 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Y . Cai, X. Deng, L. Zhang, Z. Ni, J. Mai, P. Huang, P. Zheng, L. Hu, S. Liu, Y . Xu,et al., Quantum squeezing amplifi- cation with a weak kerr nonlinear oscillator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08197 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Venkatraman, R

    J. Venkatraman, R. G. Cortiñas, N. E. Frattini, X. Xiao, and M. H. Devoret, A driven kerr oscillator with two-fold degenera- cies for qubit protection, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2311241121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Rebic, S

    S. Rebic, S. Tan, A. Parkins, and D. Walls, Large kerr nonlin- earity with a single atom, Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics1, 490 (1999)

    work page 1999

  63. [63]

    M. A. P. Reynoso, E. M. Signor, J. Khalouf-Rivera, A. D. Ribeiro, F. Pérez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Phase transitions, symmetries, and tunneling in kerr parametric oscillators, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15347 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a kerr-cat qubit, Nature584, 205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    Boutin, D

    S. Boutin, D. M. Toyli, A. V . Venkatramani, A. W. Eddins, I. Siddiqi, and A. Blais, Effect of higher-order nonlinearities on amplification and squeezing in josephson parametric amplifiers, Phys. Rev. Appl.8, 054030 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    Iachello, R

    F. Iachello, R. G. Cortiñas, F. Pérez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Symmetries of the squeeze-driven kerr oscillator, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical56, 495305 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Holmes, W

    K. Holmes, W. Rehman, S. Malzard, and E.-M. Graefe, Husimi dynamics generated by non-hermitian hamiltonians, Physical Review Letters130, 157202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    Marthaler and M

    M. Marthaler and M. Dykman, Switching via quantum acti- vation: A parametrically modulated oscillator, Physical Re- view A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics73, 042108 (2006)

    work page 2006

  69. [69]

    A. C. Oliveira, J. G. Peixoto de Faria, and M. C. Nemes, Quantum-classical transition of the open quartic oscillator: The role of the environment, Phys. Rev. E73, 046207 (2006)

    work page 2006

  70. [70]

    Nader and E

    D. Nader and E. Serrano-Ensástiga, Critical energies and wigner functions of the stationary states of the bose einstein condensates in a double-well trap, Advanced Quantum Tech- nologies , 2400451 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    Nader, J

    D. Nader, J. Hernández-González, H. Vázquez-Sánchez, and S. Lerma-Hernández, Manifestation of classical instability in the quantum density of states of a double well potential, Physics Letters A481, 129014 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Deléglise, I

    S. Deléglise, I. Dotsenko, C. Sayrin, J. Bernu, M. Brune, J.- M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Reconstruction of non-classical cavity field states with snapshots of their decoherence, Nature 455, 510—514 (2008)

    work page 2008

  73. [73]

    Hofheinz, E

    M. Hofheinz, E. Weig, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. O’Connell, H. Wang, J. M. Martinis, and A. Cle- land, Generation of fock states in a superconducting quantum circuit, Nature454, 310—314 (2008)

    work page 2008

  74. [74]

    W. B. Case, Wigner functions and Weyl transforms for pedes- trians, American Journal of Physics76, 937 (2008)

    work page 2008

  75. [75]

    Colomés, Z

    E. Colomés, Z. Zhan, and X. Oriols, Comparing wigner, husimi and bohmian distributions: which one is a true probability dis- tribution in phase space?, Journal of Computational Electronics 14, 894 (2015)

    work page 2015

  76. [76]

    Teske, M

    J. Teske, M. Besbes, B. Okhrimenko, and R. Walser, Mean-field wigner function of bose–einstein condensates in the thomas– fermi limit, Physica Scripta93, 124004 (2018)

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    Adesso, S

    G. Adesso, S. Ragy, and A. R. Lee, Continuous variable quan- tum information: Gaussian states and beyond, Open Systems & Information Dynamics21, 1440001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  78. [78]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics(Springer Science & Busi- ness Media, 2004)

    work page 2004

  79. [79]

    Olsen and A

    M. Olsen and A. Bradley, Numerical representation of quan- tum states in the positive-p and wigner representations, Optics Communications282, 3924 (2009)

    work page 2009

  80. [80]

    Koh, Wigner Function of a Time-dependent Inverted Har- monic Oscillator, New Phys

    S. Koh, Wigner Function of a Time-dependent Inverted Har- monic Oscillator, New Phys. Sae Mulli73, 74 (2023)

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.