pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18623 · v1 · pith:PXGQPCO2new · submitted 2026-05-18 · 💻 cs.DS · cs.LG

An Approximation Algorithm for Graph Label Selection

Josia John , Maximilian Probst Gutenberg , Simon Meierhans This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 07:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.DS cs.LG
keywords graph label selectionapproximation algorithmbudget constraintvertex selectionlabel predictiongraph algorithmsrepresentative set
0
0 comments X

The pith

The first Õ(log^{1.5} n)-approximation algorithm selects k vertices to label so the remaining graph labels can be predicted from structure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to select a budget of k vertices in an n-vertex graph such that labeling them allows accurate prediction of labels on all other vertices. It delivers the first approximation algorithm with an Õ(log^{1.5} n) guarantee under the standard budget limit, without allowing extra labels. Earlier approaches either permitted substantially more than k labels or offered no provable bounds and relied on heuristics. A reader cares because the result turns an intuitive task of picking representative vertices into one with a concrete performance ratio that scales with graph size.

Core claim

We present the first Õ(log^{1.5} n)-approximation algorithm for graph label selection under the standard budget constraint. The problem asks for k vertices whose labels enable accurate prediction of the labels on the remaining vertices, formalizing the task of distilling a small representative set from the whole graph. Prior work either relies on resource augmentation or consists primarily of heuristics without provable guarantees.

What carries the argument

The Õ(log^{1.5} n)-approximation algorithm for budget-constrained vertex selection that guarantees the chosen set enables prediction quality within the stated factor of optimal.

If this is right

  • The algorithm supplies the first worst-case performance bound for the problem without extra labels beyond budget k.
  • Heuristic versions of the method run on graphs too large for earlier exact or semi-exact approaches.
  • Quality remains comparable to prior heuristics while the theoretical ratio holds.
  • The method distinguishes itself from resource-augmentation techniques that select more than k vertices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same selection strategy might extend to other network tasks that reduce to picking a small influential vertex set.
  • Practical speed-ups could be tested by substituting faster subroutines for the core selection step on sparse real-world graphs.
  • If the prediction model is made explicit, the approximation ratio might translate directly into bounds on downstream classification error.

Load-bearing premise

The approach assumes that labeling the chosen vertices will allow accurate prediction of the rest via the graph structure, without defining the exact prediction method or error measure.

What would settle it

A family of graphs where every selection of k vertices leaves at least one unlabeled vertex whose label cannot be recovered better than the claimed approximation factor under any standard prediction rule.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18623 by Josia John, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Simon Meierhans.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Decreasing degree by 1 by introducing a new vertex X with ∞ edge weight. Proof. Given an internal vertex v with degree larger than 3, we can add an auxiliary vertex x as a child of v with infinite edge weight and attaching two of v’s children to x instead (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The structure of TL,τ . We notice that S ′ , L must be disjoint because all vertices in L have an edge of infinite capacity to t. We can write the size of this cut as the sum of two parts, the cut in the original tree T plus the edges from the new sink s to vertices in (V \ S ′ ) ∪ {t}. This yields wTL,τ (S ′ ∪ {s},(V \ S ′ ) ∪ {t}) = wT (S ′ , V \ S ′ ) + wTL,τ ({s},(V \ S ′ ) ∪ {t}). The second part of t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The structure of (Tl)L,τ,f for some leaf l. k1 = 2 s c1 t x1 ∞ τ k2 = 1 s c2 t x2 ∞ τ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The structure of (Tc1 )L,τ,f and (Tc2 )L,τ,f for the chil￾dren c1, c2 of v. k = k1 + k2 v s c1 c2 t a f b ∞ ∞ τ τ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The structure of (Tv)L,τ,f Lemma 5.5. Given that DP[v][k] = f ≥ 0 at some vertex v and budget k, we have that λ(Tv)L,τ,f′ ({s}, {t}) = nv · τ + f ′ for all f ′ with 0 ≤ f ′ ≤ f. Proof. The prove is by induction. The base cases are the leaves. For some leaf l ∈ LT we have DP[l][0] = −τ and DP[l][1] = ∞ by definition. The lemma does not cover the first case, so we only need to show it for the second case. We… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison of all algorithms on ca-GrQc. Due to runtime constraints, we could not run all algorithms for every value of k. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 k 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Ψ(L) Ours (METIS √n) Ours (METIS 10 √n) Ours (METIS 100 √n) Ours (Fiedler) Ours (FiedlerBalanced 1%) Ours (FiedlerBalanced 10%) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of our algorithm using different BISECT algorithms on ca-CondMat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Transforming a tree G (top) into a 1 tree cut sparsifier T (bottom). We connect a new leaf with weight ∞ to every internal vertex in G. Proof. Let G = (V, E, w) be a weighted tree. We construct a tree T = (VT , ET , wT ) as follows (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of all algorithms on ego-facebook. Due to runtime constraints, we could not run all algorithms for every value of k. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 k 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Ψ(L) Guillory Bilmes Cesa-Bianchi et al. Cohen-Addad et al. Ours (Best) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of all algorithms on the Davis Southern Women Graph. We include this figure to compare all algorithms for many different values of k. For “Ours (Best)” we ran our algorithm with all bisect algorithms and plotted the best result. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the graph label selection problem, one is given an $n$-vertex graph and a budget $k$, and seeks to select $k$ vertices whose labels enable accurate prediction of the labels on the remaining vertices. This problem formalizes distilling a small representative set from the whole graph. We present the first $\tilde{O}(\log^{1.5} n)$-approximation algorithm for graph label selection under the standard budget constraint. Prior work either relies on resource augmentation, allowing substantially more than $k$ labeled vertices, or consists primarily of heuristics without provable guarantees. Finally, we demonstrate that practical heuristic variants of our algorithm scale to significantly larger graphs than previous methods, while essentially retaining their quality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the graph label selection problem: given an n-vertex graph and budget k, select a set of k vertices to label so that the remaining labels can be accurately predicted from the graph structure. It claims the first Õ(log^{1.5} n)-approximation algorithm for this problem under the standard (non-augmented) budget constraint, improving on prior heuristics and resource-augmented methods, and reports that practical variants of the algorithm scale to larger graphs while retaining quality.

Significance. If the approximation guarantee is established with a well-defined objective, the result would be a meaningful first theoretical guarantee for a natural problem in algorithmic semi-supervised learning. The emphasis on the standard budget constraint and the accompanying practical scalability experiments are positive features that distinguish the work from earlier heuristic-only approaches.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (Problem Definition): The objective that the approximation algorithm is targeting is not made explicit. The manuscript must define the precise semi-supervised prediction model (e.g., harmonic functions, label propagation) and the loss or accuracy metric whose value is being approximated; without this, the claimed Õ(log^{1.5} n) ratio lacks a concrete target function.
  2. [§4] §4 (Algorithm and Analysis): The central approximation claim requires a self-contained proof that the returned set achieves the stated ratio with respect to the (still-to-be-specified) objective. The current presentation does not isolate the key technical steps or charging argument that yields the log^{1.5} n factor.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3] Notation for the prediction function and the budget constraint should be introduced once and used consistently throughout the analysis sections.
  2. [§6] The experimental section would benefit from a table comparing the new heuristic variants against the exact baselines on the same set of graphs and k values.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We agree that clarifying the objective function and improving the presentation of the analysis will strengthen the paper. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the necessary revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (Problem Definition): The objective that the approximation algorithm is targeting is not made explicit. The manuscript must define the precise semi-supervised prediction model (e.g., harmonic functions, label propagation) and the loss or accuracy metric whose value is being approximated; without this, the claimed Õ(log^{1.5} n) ratio lacks a concrete target function.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Upon review, we recognize that Section 2 would benefit from a more explicit statement of the semi-supervised prediction model and loss metric. In the revised manuscript we will add a precise definition: we adopt the standard harmonic function model for label propagation on graphs (as in Zhu et al.), where the objective is to minimize the expected quadratic loss on the unlabeled vertices under the harmonic extension. This will make the target of the Õ(log^{1.5} n) approximation ratio fully concrete. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Algorithm and Analysis): The central approximation claim requires a self-contained proof that the returned set achieves the stated ratio with respect to the (still-to-be-specified) objective. The current presentation does not isolate the key technical steps or charging argument that yields the log^{1.5} n factor.

    Authors: We agree that the analysis section would be clearer with a more self-contained structure. In the revision we will reorganize Section 4 to first restate the (now explicitly defined) objective, then isolate the key technical steps of the algorithm, and finally present the charging argument that establishes the Õ(log^{1.5} n) factor in a single, self-contained proof block. This will directly link the selected vertex set to the objective value. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The abstract and description present a new Õ(log^{1.5} n)-approximation algorithm for the graph label selection problem under a budget constraint. No equations, self-definitional constructions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The claimed guarantee is stated as an independent algorithmic result with comparisons to prior work that either uses resource augmentation or lacks provable guarantees. This matches the default expectation of a self-contained algorithmic paper without reduction of the central claim to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract does not introduce or rely on any explicit free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms beyond the usual modeling assumptions of graph label selection problems.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard modeling assumptions for graph label selection and label prediction from partial labels
    The problem statement presupposes that labels on a small selected set enable accurate prediction on the remainder via the graph structure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5642 in / 1219 out tokens · 54608 ms · 2026-05-20T07:58:53.565396+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Algorithms - ESA 2014

    R \"a cke, Harald and Shah, Chintan. Algorithms - ESA 2014. 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms , pages =

    R\". Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms , pages =. 2014 , isbn =

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    2511.06574 , archivePrefix=

    Daniel Agassy and Dani Dorfman and Haim Kaplan , year=. 2511.06574 , archivePrefix=

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Guillory, Andrew and Bilmes, Jeff A , booktitle =

    work page

  5. [5]

    2025 , editor =

    Cohen-Addad, Vincent and Lattanzi, Silvio and Meierhans, Simon , booktitle =. 2025 , editor =

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , articleno =

    Nguyen, Timothy and Novak, Roman and Xiao, Lechao and Lee, Jaehoon , title =. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , articleno =. 2021 , isbn =

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    2512.04923 , archivePrefix=

    MohammadHossein Bateni and Vincent Cohen-Addad and Yuzhou Gu and Silvio Lattanzi and Simon Meierhans and Christopher Mohri , year=. 2512.04923 , archivePrefix=

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , articleno =

    Cheng, Xin and Wang, Xun and Zhang, Xingxing and Ge, Tao and Chen, Si-Qing and Wei, Furu and Zhang, Huishuai and Zhao, Dongyan , title =. Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , articleno =. 2024 , isbn =

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    , title =

    Liskavets, Barys and Ushakov, Maxim and Roy, Shuvendu and Klibanov, Mark and Etemad, Ali and Luke, Shane K. , title =. Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Seventh Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fifteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence , ar...

    work page doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i23.34639 2025

  10. [10]

    2024 , editor =

    Yang, William and Zhu, Ye and Deng, Zhiwei and Russakovsky, Olga , booktitle =. 2024 , editor =

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    1997 , url =

    George Karypis and Vipin Kumar , title =. 1997 , url =

    work page 1997

  12. [12]

    Jure Leskovec and Andrej Krevl , title =

    work page

  13. [13]

    McAuley and Jure Leskovec , title =

    Julian J. McAuley and Jure Leskovec , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 (NIPS 2012) , pages =. 2012 , url =

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Kleinberg and Christos Faloutsos , title =

    Jure Leskovec and Jon M. Kleinberg and Christos Faloutsos , title =. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    work page 2007

  15. [15]

    Lang and Anirban Dasgupta and Michael W

    Jure Leskovec and Kevin J. Lang and Anirban Dasgupta and Michael W. Mahoney , title =. Internet Mathematics , volume =. 2009 , doi =

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    12th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2012) , pages =

    Jaewon Yang and Jure Leskovec , title =. 12th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2012) , pages =. 2012 , doi =

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    and Gardner, Mary R

    Davis, Allison and Gardner, Burleigh B. and Gardner, Mary R. , title =

    work page

  18. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.03716 , year=

    Henzinger, Monika and M. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.03716 , year=

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Harrelson, Chris and Hildrum, Kirsten and Rao, Satish , booktitle=

    work page

  20. [20]

    Gupta, Xiaojiang Chen, and Xin Wang

    Ren, Pengzhen and Xiao, Yun and Chang, Xiaojun and Huang, Po-Yao and Li, Zhihui and Gupta, Brij B. and Chen, Xiaojiang and Wang, Xin , title =. ACM Comput. Surv. , month = oct, articleno =. 2021 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3472291 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1145/3472291 2021

  21. [21]

    Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =

    Zhu, Xiaojin and Ghahramani, Zoubin and Lafferty, John , title =. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =. 2003 , isbn =

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    Settles, Burr , year=

    work page

  23. [23]

    2015 , editor =

    Dasarathy, Gautam and Nowak, Robert and Zhu, Xiaojin , booktitle =. 2015 , editor =

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    and Kautz, Jan and Brostow, Gabriel J

    Mac Aodha, Oisin and Campbell, Neill D.F. and Kautz, Jan and Brostow, Gabriel J. , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    work page

  25. [25]

    Kushnir, Dan and Venturi, Luca , journal=

    work page

  26. [26]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , editor =

    Hu, Shengding and Xiong, Zheng and Qu, Meng and Yuan, Xingdi and C\^. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , editor =

    work page

  27. [27]

    Zhang, Wentao and Wang, Yexin and You, Zhenbang and Cao, Meng and Huang, Ping and Shan, Jiulong and Yang, Zhi and Cui, Bin , journal=

    work page

  28. [28]

    2022 , editor =

    Zhang, Jifan and Katz-Samuels, Julian and Nowak, Robert , booktitle =. 2022 , editor =

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Raykar and Kirankumar Shiragur and Haike Xu , year=

    Piyush Anand and Piotr Indyk and Ravishankar Krishnaswamy and Sepideh Mahabadi and Vikas C. Raykar and Kirankumar Shiragur and Haike Xu , year=. 2502.13336 , archivePrefix=

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    and Teng, Shang-Hua , title =

    Spielman, Daniel A. and Teng, Shang-Hua , title =. Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing , pages =. 2004 , isbn =. doi:10.1145/1007352.1007372 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1145/1007352.1007372 2004

  31. [31]

    ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) , volume=

    Simultaneous source location , author=. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    work page 2009