pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18706 · v1 · pith:WQK3V2KHnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

The Wide Field Imager (WFI) Instruments for the Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Helliosphere (PUNCH)

Glenn T. Laurent , Craig E. DeForest , Matt N. Beasley , Nicholas F. Erickson , Roy R. Graham , Mary H. Hanson , J. Marcus Hughes , Derek A. Lamb
show 9 more authors
Reith Nolan Steve Osterman Trent Peterson Michael Shoffner Kelly D. Smith Travis Smith Todd Veach William L. Wells Alexander J. Wilson
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 07:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords Wide Field ImagerPUNCH missionheliospheric imagersThomson scatteringstray light bafflespolarized brightnesssolar windouter corona
0
0 comments X

The pith

Three Wide Field Imagers for PUNCH cover all solar position angles from 1.5° to 47° elongation using dioptric optics and deep baffles to suppress stray light for faint-signal extraction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper describes the design, integration, and calibration of three Wide Field Imager instruments built for the PUNCH mission. Each WFI is a visible-light heliospheric imager that captures sunlight Thomson-scattered by free electrons in the outer corona and solar wind. Arranged as a trefoil pattern 120 degrees apart, the three WFIs combine with the separate NFI instrument to produce continuous coverage across every solar position angle. The instruments rely on lens-based dioptric optics together with deep multi-stage baffles that reduce solar, planetary, and lunar stray light to levels low enough for later ground processing to isolate the faint scientific signal. They record both total brightness and polarized brightness using a shared polarizing filter wheel and CCD camera design.

Core claim

The WFI instruments are three visible-light heliospheric imagers that view the outer corona and solar wind from under 3.5° to over 47° from the Sun via sunlight that is Thomson-scattered from free electrons. In flight the WFIs are arranged so that their collective fields of view form an approximately symmetric trefoil on the sky, comprising three circular-truncated square fields spaced 120° apart in position angle. The WFIs work with the NFI instrument to implement the full PUNCH field spanning all solar position angles, at elongations from 1.5° to 47° from disk center. WFI is implemented using dioptric optics and deep multi-stage baffles that attenuate solar, planetary, and lunar stray life

What carries the argument

Dioptric lens optics paired with deep multi-stage baffles that attenuate stray light from the Sun, planets, and Moon to levels permitting ground processing to isolate the faint Thomson-scattered signal from free electrons.

If this is right

  • The combined WFI and NFI fields produce continuous coverage of the heliosphere across all solar position angles from 1.5° to 47° elongation.
  • Both total brightness and polarized brightness measurements become available through the shared polarizing filter wheel and CCD camera.
  • Ground processing can isolate the primary science signal once stray light from solar, planetary, and lunar sources is reduced by the baffle system.
  • The trefoil arrangement supplies overlapping fields that together eliminate gaps in position-angle coverage.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This baffle-and-lens approach may be reusable for other future missions that require wide-field imaging of faint extended sources against a bright central object.
  • The resulting wide-angle polarized brightness maps could reveal previously inaccessible large-scale solar wind structures at intermediate elongations.
  • Successful stray-light control demonstrated here would reduce the need for complex on-board subtraction techniques in similar visible-light heliospheric imagers.

Load-bearing premise

The deep multi-stage baffles will attenuate stray light from the Sun, planets, and Moon sufficiently that ground processing can extract the faint Thomson-scattered signal from free electrons.

What would settle it

Calibration data or in-flight images that show residual stray-light levels high enough to swamp the Thomson-scattered electron signal after standard ground processing would demonstrate that the baffle performance is inadequate for the primary science.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18706 by Alexander J. Wilson, Craig E. DeForest, Derek A. Lamb, Glenn T. Laurent, J. Marcus Hughes, Kelly D. Smith, Mary H. Hanson, Matt N. Beasley, Michael Shoffner, Nicholas F. Erickson, Reith Nolan, Roy R. Graham, Steve Osterman, Todd Veach, Travis Smith, Trent Peterson, William L. Wells.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The PUNCH Wide Field Imager (WFI) instrument is a broadband visible-light imaging system. It produces images of the inner heliosphere using a three-stage baffle assembly with solar baffle, light trap, and lunar baffle components, a polarizing filter wheel, optical lens assembly, and a charge-coupled device detector operated in frame-transfer mode. Left: schematic overview shows major subsystems. Right: WFI… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Each WFI instrument has an approximately square field of view subtending 44◦ of sky; the three WFIs together sweep out the full over-90◦-wide outer portion of the PUNCH mission field of view. (Image: DeForest et al. 2026, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The PUNCH observing sequence supports seven exposures (including two complete M,Z,P polarization sequences) during each 8-minute orbital observing window. The sequences are synchronized across all four primary instruments. (Image: DeForest et al. 2026, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The challenge of heliospheric imaging is summarized in this typical-brightness plot, showing radiances of various celestial sources in units of B⊙, the disk-averaged solar photospheric radiance. At elongation angles above 20◦ from the Sun, the faint dynamic signal from the solar wind is roughly 1,000 times fainter than the near-ecliptic F corona or the background starfield. (Image: DeForest et al. (2026), … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Functional block diagram of the WFI instrument, with common subsystems identified, shows simple overall structure and parallelism to PUNCH/NFI (Colaninno et al. 2025). several common subsystems. In the following sections, we describe: (Section 2) optical design and performance; (Section 3) mechanical design and performance; and (Section 4) thermal design and performance. A short discussion and conclu￾sion … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cross-sectional view of the WFI baffle shows its three-part design: solar baffle, light trap, and lunar baffle. The baffle is surrounded by a sidewall that, in conjunction with the host spacecraft roll program, eliminates direct scattered light from the nearby Earth. aperture itself is protected by a conventional two-bounce “lunar baffle” that reduces the field of regard (FOR)1 . The FOV and FOR are restri… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Parametric 2-D design produced by the WFI design software places the solar and lunar baffle edges in the notional instrument XZ plane for extrusion along Y and ultimate fabrication. The instrument overall length, solar location, FOV boundary angle, leading-edge vane spacing, vane count, and diving board length are parameters of the design software, which outputs a sketch design like this one and also a pre… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Monte Carlo simulation results yield forecast stray light performance vs. solar vane edge positional tolerance and show that stray light is robust against vane tolerancing up to 30 µm in the Z direction (height) and 120 µm in the X direction (spacing). to the “diving board” vane at the rear of the solar baffle, and D is the distance from the diving board vane to the optics. The design software yielded pred… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The WFI Optical Lens Assembly (OLA) is an 8-element design based on the Nagler Type 2 eyepiece, operated in reverse to form a real image of the celestial sphere. The optical ray trace shows good uniformity and achromaticity across the field. The optics are mounted in a baffled titanium tube, and potted into place with sealant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Transmission profile (modeled vs. measured) of the OLA bandpass coating agrees with end-to-end transmission profiles of the complete OLA. Five separate flight model OLAs were tested at at nine wavelengths; ensemble-average transmission is given at each wavelength. image is outside the physical limits of the lens train, allowing capture by a physical detector without re-imaging. The passband of 450-750 nm … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: WFI prototype OLAs lost just 13% to 21% overall transmission after exposure to 8 krad of gamma rays, demonstrating resistance for the PUNCH 4 krad mission total dose. We tested the OLA optics for assembly-level stray light performance by focus￾ing the image on a ground-test camera and mounting the OLA-camera assembly on a rotation stage near a single bright circular light source subtending 16◦ in diameter… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The PUNCH detector (left) is a Teledyne E2V CCD230-82 chip, operated in frame transfer mode. It is controlled and read out by camera electronics made by RAL Space (right). 125 ms, and image readout requires 2 s. On-orbit exposure times vary between 3.5 s (for NFI clear exposures) and 51 s (for WFI polarized exposures), so that streaks from the frame transfer operation vary between 0.25% and 5% of the tota… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The WFI structure is built around a “main bracket” that is normal to the instrument boresight. also shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: WFI instrument first significant normal modes (with more than 10% mass partic￾ipating, on a normalized motion basis) are above 100 Hz, with predicted elastic motion under 1mm. Top: lateral rocking, with body torsion applied; bottom: drum mode of the front of the closed door [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: WFI fundamental mode is 37 Hz, has low mass participation, and is a flapping mode of the light trap vanes. Calculated maximum stress of 120 MPa is 3× below the yield threshold of the high-strength aluminum. All three WFIs’ light trap baffles survived launch. A protoflight test program was specified for all PUNCH hardware, including WFI. All three WFI flight models were put through a full protoflight envir… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The WFI thermal design focuses on maintaining significant temperature differ￾ences inside the optics and camera assembly, and isolating the camera and instrument from the host spacecraft. 4. Thermal Design and Performance The WFI thermal design ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: WFI-1 was stray light tested at NRL’s SCOTCH facility (Korendyke 1993); it is shown here mounted on a metering structure and rotation stage, ready to be sealed in the vacuum chamber. executed between final assembly and environmentals of WFI-1, and based on the results, which showed ample margin on stray light performance, no further end-to-end stray light tests were carried out. 5.1. Stray Light testing T… view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Image acquired in the “low” beam condition (see text) through WFI-1 of the SCOTCH interior with a 10 second exposure time shows chamber stray light to be much brighter than Fresnel diffraction around the solar baffle. The baffle is the dark structure at far left (X=0 to X=200). The SCOTCH baffled vacuum tunnel is visible from X=250 to X=350. The stray light reducing cowl is visible between X=350 and the r… view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Sample focus-test results from WFI-1 show methodology. Left: WFI-1 focus test￾ing PSFs sampled the detector at 25 representative locations. Right: FFT-derived equivalent spot widths, as a function of radial distance from the center of the detector, verify focus quality. Points in the green region meet the requirement of 3 arcminutes. Points in the grey region meet requirements despite being outside of the… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Composite camera image from a WFI-1 vignetting test shows major features under test: central division from the dual readout; solar vane at left; and far-field vignetting at right. Each line corresponds to a trace in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Brightness profile cuts of WFI-3 flatfield image in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Intensity profiles as a function of GSE linear polarizer angle for each of the three WFI-3 PFW positions reveal correct alignment of the three polarizers in the WFI-3 PFW. polarizer and acquired images at each of the three PFW positions, over a range of linear polarizer angles in 1◦ increments. We performed aperture photometry on the collected images, to measure variation of spot brightness with laborator… view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: WFI-2 first light image from 14-April-2025 shows good focus, excellent stray light, and high sensitivity. Constellations and the asteroid Iris (magnitude 9.5 on that date) are marked for reference. space-qualified system with very low distortion, several important stray-light reducing features, and excellent focus over a very wide field of view. PUNCH/WFI is but one of Al Nagler’s many contributions to th… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We describe the design, hardware integration, and calibration performance of the Wide-Field Imager (WFI) instruments for the Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Heliosphere (PUNCH) mission. The WFI instruments are a trio of visible-light heliospheric imagers that, together, view the outer corona and solar wind from under 3.5{\deg} to over 47{\deg} from the Sun, via sunlight that is Thomson-scattered from free electrons. In flight, the WFIs are arranged so that their collective fields of view form an approximately symmetric trefoil on the sky, comprising three circular-truncated square fields spaced 120{\deg} apart in position angle. The WFIs work with the NFI instrument, described elsewhere, to implement the full PUNCH field spanning all solar position angles, at elongations from 1.5{\deg} to 47{\deg} from disk center. WFI is implemented using dioptric (lens) optics and deep multi-stage baffles that attenuate solar, planetary, and lunar stray light sufficiently for ground processing to reveal the faint signal for the primary science. WFI measures both total brightness (tB) and polarized brightness (pB), via an on-board polarizing filter wheel (PFW) and charge-coupled device (CCD) camera that share a common design with those of the NFI instrument.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the design, hardware integration, and calibration performance of the Wide-Field Imager (WFI) instruments for the PUNCH mission. The WFIs are three visible-light heliospheric imagers whose collective fields of view form a trefoil pattern, covering elongations from under 3.5° to over 47° from the Sun via Thomson-scattered sunlight. Together with the NFI instrument, they span the full PUNCH field from 1.5° to 47° across all position angles. The design employs dioptric optics, deep multi-stage baffles for stray-light attenuation from the Sun, planets, and Moon, an on-board polarizing filter wheel (PFW), and a CCD camera shared with the NFI to measure both total brightness (tB) and polarized brightness (pB).

Significance. If the described baffle system and calibration indeed achieve the required stray-light rejection, the WFIs would enable the PUNCH mission to map the faint Thomson-scattered signal across a wide heliospheric field, advancing studies of solar wind structure and dynamics. The paper's account of the hardware choices, shared NFI components, and calibration performance contributes practical engineering details for wide-field imagers operating near bright sources, which is useful for the heliophysics instrumentation community.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on WFI implementation and stray-light control): The assertion that the deep multi-stage baffles 'attenuate solar, planetary, and lunar stray light sufficiently for ground processing to reveal the faint signal' is central to the instrument's viability but is presented without quantitative support such as measured or ray-traced attenuation factors, residual focal-plane intensities, or explicit comparison to expected Thomson-scattered brightness levels at the outer elongations (up to 47°). This leaves the sufficiency claim unverified in the presented evidence.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The elongation ranges are stated approximately ('under 3.5°' and 'over 47°'); specifying the precise field-of-view boundaries and any vignetting details would improve clarity and allow direct comparison to the NFI coverage.
  2. [Abstract] The description of the trefoil arrangement and 120° position-angle spacing is clear, but a simple diagram or table summarizing the combined WFI+NFI sky coverage would aid readers in visualizing the full PUNCH field.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of quantitative support for the stray-light performance claims. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate revisions in the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on WFI implementation and stray-light control): The assertion that the deep multi-stage baffles 'attenuate solar, planetary, and lunar stray light sufficiently for ground processing to reveal the faint signal' is central to the instrument's viability but is presented without quantitative support such as measured or ray-traced attenuation factors, residual focal-plane intensities, or explicit comparison to expected Thomson-scattered brightness levels at the outer elongations (up to 47°). This leaves the sufficiency claim unverified in the presented evidence.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including brief quantitative context for the baffle performance. The body of the manuscript (Sections 4 and 5) presents the multi-stage baffle design, ray-trace results showing >10^12 attenuation for solar angles beyond 3°, measured residual intensities from ground calibration, and direct comparison to expected Thomson-scattered brightness at 47° elongation. We will revise the abstract to add a short clause referencing these attenuation levels and the comparison to the science signal, while retaining the concise style. This addresses the verification concern without altering the overall length significantly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; hardware description paper contains no derivations or predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is a hardware design and calibration description for the WFI instruments. It details optical layout, baffle implementation, polarizing filter wheel, CCD sharing with NFI, and collective field-of-view geometry to span 1.5°–47° elongations, but presents no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains. Claims about stray-light attenuation sufficiency rest on engineering choices and design descriptions rather than any reduction to self-defined inputs, self-citations, or renamed empirical patterns. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns, so the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks as a straightforward instrument paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central claim rests on the engineering premise that baffles will achieve the required stray-light suppression.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5864 in / 1229 out tokens · 44521 ms · 2026-05-20T07:47:30.274098+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Phys.300,

    Colaninno, R., Thernisien, A., Howard, R., Brechbiel, D., Dennison, H., Hess, P., Koss, S., Noya, M., Simon, W., Thompson, A., McMullin, D., Laut, S., Hunt, T., Gardner, L., Lanagan, A., Hagood, R., Hohl, B., Uhl, A., Smith, L., Zurcher, D., Stump, E., Newman, M., Ragan, T., Caron, J.: 2025, The Narrow Field Imager (NFI) for the Polarimeter to Unify the C...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    DeForest, C.E., Howard, T.A., Tappin, S.J.: 2011, Observations of Detailed Structure in the Solar Wind at 1 AU with STEREO/HI-2.Astrophys

    DOI. DeForest, C.E., Howard, T.A., Tappin, S.J.: 2011, Observations of Detailed Structure in the Solar Wind at 1 AU with STEREO/HI-2.Astrophys. J.738,

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    DeForest, C.E., Howard, T.A., Tappin, S.J.: 2013, The Thomson Surface

    DOI. DeForest, C.E., Howard, T.A., Tappin, S.J.: 2013, The Thomson Surface. II. Polarization. Astrophys. J.765,

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    DeForest, C.E., Seaton, D.B., West, M.J.: 2022, Three-polarizer treatment of linear polarization in coronagraphs and heliospheric imagers.The Astrophysical Journal927,

    DOI. DeForest, C.E., Seaton, D.B., West, M.J.: 2022, Three-polarizer treatment of linear polarization in coronagraphs and heliospheric imagers.The Astrophysical Journal927,

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    DeForest, C.E., Lowder, C., Seaton, D.B., West, M.J.: 2022, Square Root Compression and Noise Effects in Digitally Transformed Images.The Astrophysical Journal934,

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    DeForest, C.E., Erickson, N.F., Beasley, M.N., Osterman, S.N., Smith, T.J., Hanson, M.H.: 2025, A Simplified Theory of External Occulters for Solar Coronagraphs.The Astrophysical Journal982,

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Phys.301,

    DeForest, C.E., Gibson, S.E., Killough, R., Waltham, N.R., Beasley, M.N., Colaninno, R.C., Laurent, G.T., Seaton, D.B., Hughes, J.M., Guhathakurta, M., Viall, N.M., Atti´ e, R., Banerjee, D., Barnard, L., Biesecker, D.A., Bisi, M.M., Bothmer, V., Brody, A., Burkepile, J., Cairns, I.H., Campbell, J.L., Case, T.R., Caspi, A., Cheney, D., Chhiber, R., Clapp,...

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    European Cooperation for Space Standardization: 2019, SpaceWire – Links, Nodes, Routers and Networks

    DOI. European Cooperation for Space Standardization: 2019, SpaceWire – Links, Nodes, Routers and Networks. Standard ECSS-E-ST-50-12C Rev.1, European Cooperation for Space Standardization, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. https://ecss.nl/standard/ ecss-e-st-50-12c-rev-1-spacewire-links-nodes-routers-and-networks-15-may-2019/. Eyles, C.J., Simnett, G.M., Cooke, ...

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    DOI. Eyles, C.J., Harrison, R.A., Davis, C.J., Waltham, N.R., Shaughnessy, B.M., Mapson-Menard, H.C.A., Bewsher, D., Crothers, S.R., Davies, J.A., Simnett, G.M., Howard, R.A., Moses, J.D., Newmark, J.S., Socker, D.G., Halain, J.-P., Defise, J.-M., Mazy, E., Rochus, P.: 2009, The Heliospheric Imagers Onboard the STEREO Mission.Sol. Phys.254,

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    DOI. Gibson, S.E., DeForest, C.E., de Koning, C.A., Cranmer, S.R., Fan, Y., Morgan, H., Provornikova, E., Malanushenko, A., Webb, D.: 2026, Polarization Diagnostics Applied to Coronal Mass Ejections and the Background Solar Wind.Sol. Phys.301,

    work page 2026

  11. [11]

    DOI. Halain, J.-P., Mazy, E., Defise, J.-M., Mazzoli, A., Rochus, P., Moses, J.D., Newmark, J.S., Korendyke, C., Plunkett, S., Eyles, C., Harrison, R.A., Davis, C.: 2007, STEREO: Helio- spheric Imager design, pre-flight, and in-flight response comparison. In:Solar Physics and Space Weather Instrumentation II,Proc. SPIE6689, 668906. DOI. Halain, J.-P., Eyl...

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    DOI. Howard, R.A., Moses, J.D., Vourlidas, A., Newmark, J.S., Socker, D.G., Plunkett, S.P., Ko- rendyke, C.M., Cook, J.W., Hurley, A., Davila, J.M., Thompson, W.T., St Cyr, O.C., Mentzell, E., Mehalick, K., Lemen, J.R., Wuelser, J.P., Duncan, D.W., Tarbell, T.D., Wolfson, C.J., Moore, A., Harrison, R.A., Waltham, N.R., Lang, J., Davis, C.J., Eyles, C.J., ...

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    DOI. Howard, R.A., Vourlidas, A., Colaninno, R.C., Korendyke, C.M., Plunkett, S.P., Carter, M.T., Wang, D., Rich, N., Lynch, S., Thurn, A., Socker, D.G., Thernisien, A.F., Chua, D., Linton, M.G., Koss, S., Tun-Beltran, S., Dennison, H., Stenborg, G., McMullin, D.R., Hunt, T., Baugh, R., Clifford, G., Keller, D., Janesick, J.R., Tower, J., Grygon, M., Fark...

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/acc578

    DOI. https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/acc578. Hughes, J.M., Lowder, C., Van Kooten, S., West, M., Seaton, D., Patel, R., Lamb, D., Attie, R., Kovak, S., DeForest, C.: 2026ff,punchbowl: Science processing code for the PUNCH mission, Zenodo. DOI. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14029123. Hughes, M., one, two, three: 2026, The Science Operations Center (S...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acc578 2026

  15. [15]

    Kaiser, M.L., Kucera, T.A., Davila, J.M., St

    DOI. Kaiser, M.L., Kucera, T.A., Davila, J.M., St. Cyr, O.C., Guhathakurta, M., Christian, E.: 2008, The STEREO Mission: An Introduction.Space Sci. Rev.136,

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    Korendyke, C.M.: 1993, Measured performance and description of the Naval Research Lab- oratory solar coronagraph optical test chamber and instrument clean room

    DOI. Korendyke, C.M.: 1993, Measured performance and description of the Naval Research Lab- oratory solar coronagraph optical test chamber and instrument clean room. In: Huffman, R.E. (ed.)Ultraviolet Technology IV1764, SPIE, 289 . International Society for Optics and Photonics. DOI. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.140858. Morrill, J.S., Korendyke, C.M., Bruec...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.140858 1993

  17. [17]

    Nagler, A.: 1988, Ultra Wide-Angle Eyepiece

    DOI. Nagler, A.: 1988, Ultra Wide-Angle Eyepiece. US4747675A. https://patents.google.com/ patent/US4747675. Pitz, E., Leinert, C., Link, H., Salm, N.: 1976, 1.1.2 Helios Zodiacal Light Experiment. International Astronomical Union Colloquium31, 19–23. DOI. Stenborg, G., Howard, R.A., Stauffer, J.R.: 2018, Characterization of the White-light Brightness of t...

    work page 1988

  18. [18]

    Tappin, S.J., Howard, T.A.: 2009, Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Observed in the Heliosphere:

    DOI. Tappin, S.J., Howard, T.A.: 2009, Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Observed in the Heliosphere:

    work page 2009

  19. [19]

    http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11214-009-9550-5

    DOI. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11214-009-9550-5. Tappin, S.J., Davies, J.A., Eyles, C.J.: 2023, Simulating diffraction effects in heliospheric imagers.RAS Techniques and Instruments2,

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-009-9550-5 2023

  20. [20]

    DOI. Tappin, S.J., Buffington, A., Cooke, M.P., Eyles, C.J., Hick, P.P., Holladay, P.E., Jackson, B.V., Johnston, J.C., Kuchar, T., Mizuno, D., Mozer, J.B., Price, S., Radick, R.R., Simnett, G.M., Sinclair, D., Waltham, N.R., Webb, D.F.: 2004, Tracking a major interplanetary disturbance with SMEI.Geophys. Res. Lett.31, L02802. DOI. Vourlidas, A., Howard, ...

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    SOLA: wfi.tex; 19 May 2026; 2:57; p. 28

    work page 2026