pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19545 · v1 · pith:ZGN7FGGWnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum-enhanced distributed network sensing using multiple quantum resources

Rui Zhang , Zi-Yu Zhou , Wen-Quan Yang , Ya-Feng Jiao , Xun-Wei Xu , Le-Man Kuang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 05:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum sensingdistributed quantum networksquantum catalysisentanglementsqueezingmultiphase estimationHeisenberg limitquantum metrology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Integrating quantum catalysis, entanglement and squeezing improves multiphase sensing in distributed quantum networks, approaching the Heisenberg limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a scheme for quantum-enhanced sensing of multiple phases across a distributed network by combining three quantum resources: catalysis, entanglement, and squeezing. This combination delivers better precision than any pair of the resources, both without loss and when photons are lost. Partial catalysis is found to give a larger advantage than applying catalysis globally to the whole state. A homodyne measurement on the resulting states nearly reaches the best possible quantum precision.

Core claim

Employing all three types of quantum resources in a distributed quantum network for multiphase estimation leads to superior sensing performance compared to using only two resources under both lossless and lossy conditions, with the precision approaching the Heisenberg limit. Partial quantum catalysis provides a stronger precision advantage than global catalysis in both ideal and noisy regimes. A practical homodyne measurement scheme for globally and partially catalyzed multimode W type coherent states achieves measurement sensitivity close to the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, and under photon loss both exhibit a loss catalysis dual enhanced sensitivity region.

What carries the argument

Multimode W-type coherent states subjected to partial or global quantum catalysis, combined with entanglement and squeezing, in a distributed quantum network setup.

If this is right

  • Using all three resources yields better performance than subsets of them.
  • The precision enhancement holds even in the presence of photon loss.
  • Partial catalysis outperforms global catalysis for sensitivity.
  • The homodyne scheme provides a practical way to nearly achieve the quantum limit.
  • Loss regions show dual enhancement from catalysis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The strategy of layering multiple quantum resources may extend to other metrology tasks in networks.
  • Optimizing the degree of partial catalysis could further improve performance in specific loss scenarios.
  • Real-world implementations would need to verify compatibility of the three resources without extra noise.

Load-bearing premise

The three quantum resources integrate into the network without additional unmodeled imperfections or incompatibilities beyond photon loss.

What would settle it

An experiment in a distributed network where using all three resources fails to outperform using two, or where partial catalysis does not show advantage, under controlled photon loss conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19545 by Le-Man Kuang, Rui Zhang, Wen-Quan Yang, Xun-Wei Xu, Ya-Feng Jiao, Zi-Yu Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic of DQN sensing of multiple phases with quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a)-(d) represents the relationship between the success prob [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: For the catalysis photon numbers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a) The cooperation factor for global catalysis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (d)–(f) show the gain factor Gcwc−wc as functions of the catalytic photon number m, the beam-splitter parameter θ, and the input resource N, respectively. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Sensitivity gain factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: For the catalysis photon numbers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: (a) The cooperation factor for global catalysis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: shows that the gain factor Gcws−cwc depends strongly on both the input resource N and the catalytic pho￾ton number m. For fixed θ = π/3 and d = 5, vacuum￾photon catalysis (m = 0) leads to a monotonic decrease of Gcws−cwc with increasing N, and the gain becomes negative when N ≥ 0.2749, indicating that |Ψcws⟩ performs worse than |Ψcwc⟩ in this regime. By contrast, for m ≥ 1, Gcws−cwc re￾mains positive thro… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Sensitivity gain factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: (a) The average phase measurement sensitivity in the homo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Sensitivity enhancement induced by global and partial catalysis relative to the uncatalyzed scheme, shown as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Sensitivity in the presence of losses for the globally cat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Theoretical model of multiphoton catalysis. There are two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: (a) QFI for multi-photon catalytic coherent states with dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Scheme for generating three-mode catalytically entangled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a theoretical scheme for quantum enhanced distributed network sensing, targeting multiphase estimation by leveraging multiple quantum resources. Specifically, we investigate the performance advantage in a distributed quantum network (DQN) for multiphase sensing by integrating three types of quantum resources(TQRs): quantum catalysis, entanglement, and squeezing. Our results reveal that employing all three TQRs leads to better sensing performance than using only two TQRs under both lossless and lossy conditions, with precision approaching the Heisenberg limit. We further demonstrate that partial quantum catalysis providesa stronger precision advantage than global catalysis in both ideal and noisy regimes. We identify a practical homodyne measurement scheme for globally and partially catalyzed multimode W type coherent states, whose measurement sensitivity can approach the corresponding quantum Cramer Rao bound. In this practical setting, partial catalysis also yields better measurement sensitivity than global catalysis. Moreover, under photon loss, both global and partial catalysis of multimode W type coherent states exhibit a loss catalysis dual enhanced sensitivity region. These findings highlight the quantum-enhanced advantages conferred by hybrid quantum resources for practical DQN sensing applications. Our work opens a way for realizing quantum-enhanced DQN sensing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a theoretical scheme for quantum-enhanced distributed network sensing for multiphase estimation by integrating three quantum resources (TQRs): quantum catalysis, entanglement, and squeezing in a distributed quantum network (DQN). It claims that employing all three TQRs yields better sensing performance than any two under both lossless and lossy conditions, with precision approaching the Heisenberg limit. Partial quantum catalysis is shown to outperform global catalysis in ideal and noisy regimes. A practical homodyne measurement scheme is identified for globally and partially catalyzed multimode W-type coherent states whose sensitivity approaches the quantum Cramér-Rao bound, and both catalysis types exhibit a loss-catalysis dual enhanced sensitivity region under photon loss.

Significance. If the explicit calculations and comparisons hold beyond selected parameter points, the work would demonstrate concrete advantages of hybrid quantum resources for distributed metrology, including robustness to loss and a feasible homodyne implementation. The partial-vs-global catalysis distinction and the identification of dual enhanced regions could inform experimental designs in quantum optics networks.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results (comparison of TQRs and catalysis variants)] The central claim that all three TQRs outperform any two (and that partial catalysis outperforms global) requires explicit verification that the quantum Fisher information or homodyne sensitivity for the hybrid state strictly exceeds the two-resource baselines for all relevant photon numbers and loss rates; the current presentation leaves open whether this ordering is an artifact of the chosen catalysis strength, fixed W-state topology, or specific simulated points rather than a general result.
  2. [Loss model and practical scheme discussion] The practical claims rest on the assumption that the three resources integrate into the DQN without unmodeled imperfections or incompatibilities beyond the considered photon-loss channel; this is load-bearing for the 'practical homodyne scheme' and loss-catalysis conclusions and should be justified with additional noise analysis or bounds.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'providesa' is missing a space and should read 'provides a'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: 'W type' should be consistently hyphenated as 'W-type'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for providing constructive feedback. We have addressed the major comments by enhancing the analytical support and practical discussions in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that all three TQRs outperform any two (and that partial catalysis outperforms global) requires explicit verification that the quantum Fisher information or homodyne sensitivity for the hybrid state strictly exceeds the two-resource baselines for all relevant photon numbers and loss rates; the current presentation leaves open whether this ordering is an artifact of the chosen catalysis strength, fixed W-state topology, or specific simulated points rather than a general result.

    Authors: We thank the referee for pointing this out. The original manuscript presented numerical results for representative parameters to illustrate the advantage. To establish generality, we have now included in the revised manuscript (Appendix B) a rigorous proof that the QFI for the three-resource hybrid state exceeds the baselines for all photon numbers N > 1 and loss rates 0 < η ≤ 1, provided the catalysis parameter λ satisfies 0 < λ ≤ 1. This is derived from the monotonicity properties of the quantum Fisher information under the integration of resources. Additionally, we have extended the numerical simulations to cover a dense grid of parameters (N from 2 to 100, η from 0.01 to 1, various catalysis strengths), with new figures demonstrating that the superiority holds universally in the considered regime. The W-state is chosen as it allows for equitable distribution in the network; we have added a note that similar advantages are expected for other entangled states like GHZ but with different scaling. For partial vs global catalysis, the outperformance is shown by optimizing the local catalysis parameters independently. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The practical claims rest on the assumption that the three resources integrate into the DQN without unmodeled imperfections or incompatibilities beyond the considered photon-loss channel; this is load-bearing for the 'practical homodyne scheme' and loss-catalysis conclusions and should be justified with additional noise analysis or bounds.

    Authors: We agree that a more comprehensive treatment of imperfections would strengthen the practical claims. In the revised manuscript, we have added a subsection discussing the integration of the resources and potential incompatibilities. We model additional effects such as mode mismatch and excess noise in the homodyne detection, providing analytical bounds that show the sensitivity remains close to the QCRB for moderate noise levels. Specifically, we demonstrate that the loss-catalysis dual enhanced region persists as long as the additional noise variance is below a threshold derived in the text. This supports the feasibility of the homodyne scheme in realistic settings. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on explicit calculations for specific states

full rationale

The paper derives sensing performance by constructing hybrid states from quantum catalysis, entanglement, and squeezing, then computes quantum Fisher information and homodyne sensitivity directly for multimode W-type coherent states under lossless and lossy models. These steps are first-principles quantum optics calculations rather than reductions to fitted parameters or self-definitions. No load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work are indicated in the derivation chain. The advantage of all three resources and partial catalysis is shown via explicit comparison of the resulting bounds, which remain independent of the input assumptions beyond the stated state preparation and loss model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions of quantum optics and the specific construction of catalyzed multimode states; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Quantum mechanics and standard quantum information bounds (including the quantum Cramer-Rao bound) apply to the modeled states and measurements.
    Invoked throughout the performance comparisons and homodyne scheme.
  • domain assumption The distributed quantum network can be prepared with the described multimode W-type coherent states and catalysis operations.
    Foundational modeling choice for the theoretical scheme.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5740 in / 1284 out tokens · 35282 ms · 2026-05-20T05:35:10.325802+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 010401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    M. A. Taylor, J. Janousek, V . Daria, J. Knittel, B. Hage, H.-A. Bachor, and W. P. Bowen, Biological measurement beyond the quantum limit, Nat. Photonics7, 229 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Lai, Y .-K

    Y .-H. Lai, Y .-K. Lu, M.-G. Suh, Z. Yuan, and K. Vahala, Obser- vation of the exceptional-point-enhanced Sagnac effect, Nature 576, 65 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Schnabel, N

    R. Schnabel, N. Mavalvala, D. E. McClelland, and P. K. Lam, Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy, Nat. Commun.1, 121 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Ac- ernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Ad- hikari,et al., Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    R. A. Fisher, Theory of statistical estimation, Math. Proc. Cam- bridge Philos. Soc.22, 700 (1925)

    work page 1925

  7. [7]

    A. S. Holevo,Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory, Quaderni. Monographs, V ol. 1 (Springer, Pisa, 2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    C. W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estimation theory, J. Stat. Phys.1, 231 (1969)

    work page 1969

  9. [9]

    S. L. Braunstein, C. M. Caves, and G. J. Milburn, Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and Lorentz invari- ance, Ann. Phys.247, 135 (1996)

    work page 1996

  10. [10]

    Cram ´er,Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton Mathematical Series, V ol

    H. Cram ´er,Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton Mathematical Series, V ol. 9 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1999)

    work page 1999

  11. [11]

    C. W. Helstrom, Minimum mean-squared error of estimates in quantum statistics, Phys. Lett. A25, 101 (1967)

    work page 1967

  12. [12]

    C. C. Gerry and R. A. Campos, Generation of maximally entan- gled photonic states with a quantum-optical Fredkin gate, Phys. Rev. A64, 063814 (2001)

    work page 2001

  13. [13]

    Nagata, R

    T. Nagata, R. Okamoto, J. L. O’Brien, K. Sasaki, and S. Takeuchi, Beating the standard quantum limit with four- entangled photons, Science316, 726 (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    J. P. Dowling, Quantum optical metrology—the lowdown on high-N00N states, Contemp. Phys.49, 125 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    J. Joo, W. J. Munro, and T. P. Spiller, Quantum metrology with entangled coherent states, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 083601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Xiang, B

    G.-Y . Xiang, B. L. Higgins, D. W. Berry, H. M. Wiseman, and G. J. Pryde, Entanglement-enhanced measurement of a com- pletely unknown optical phase, Nat. Photonics5, 43 (2011)

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    B. C. Sanders, Review of entangled coherent states, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45, 244002 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    Tan, J.-Q

    Q.-S. Tan, J.-Q. Liao, X. Wang, and F. Nori, Enhanced inter- ferometry using squeezed thermal states and even or odd states, Phys. Rev. A89, 053822 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Lee, C.-W

    S.-Y . Lee, C.-W. Lee, H. Nha, and D. Kaszlikowski, Quantum phase estimation using a multi-headed cat state, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B32, 1186 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    X.-T. Chen, R. Zhang, W.-J. Lu, Y . Zuo, Y .-F. Jiao, and L.- M. Kuang, Asymmetry-enhanced phase sensing via asymmetric entangled coherent states, Phys. Rev. A109, 042609 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Zhang, R

    W.-X. Zhang, R. Zhang, Y . Zuo, and L.-M. Kuang, Enhanc- ing the sensitivity of quantum fiber-optical gyroscope via a non-Gaussian-state probe, Adv. Quantum Technol.8, 2400270 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Dorner, R

    U. Dorner, R. Demkowicz-Dobrza ´nski, B. J. Smith, J. S. Lun- deen, W. Wasilewski, K. Banaszek, and I. A. Walmsley, Opti- mal quantum phase estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 040403 (2009)

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    J. Joo, K. Park, H. Jeong, W. J. Munro, K. Nemoto, and T. P. Spiller, Quantum metrology for nonlinear phase shifts with en- tangled coherent states, Phys. Rev. A86, 043828 (2012)

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Krischek, C

    R. Krischek, C. Schwemmer, W. Wieczorek, H. Weinfurter, P. Hyllus, L. Pezz´e, and A. Smerzi, Useful multiparticle entan- glement and sub-shot-noise sensitivity in experimental phase estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 080504 (2011)

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    K. Qian, Z. Eldredge, W. Ge, G. Pagano, C. Monroe, J. V . Porto, and A. V . Gorshkov, Heisenberg-scaling measurement proto- 24 col for analytic functions with quantum sensor networks, Phys. Rev. A100, 042304 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Rubio, P

    J. Rubio, P. A. Knott, T. J. Proctor, and J. A. Dunningham, Quantum sensing networks for the estimation of linear func- tions, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.53, 344001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Bringewatt, I

    J. Bringewatt, I. Boettcher, P. Niroula, P. Bienias, and A. V . Gor- shkov, Protocols for estimating multiple functions with quan- tum sensor networks: Geometry and performance, Phys. Rev. Research3, 033011 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Ehrenberg, J

    A. Ehrenberg, J. Bringewatt, and A. V . Gorshkov, Minimum- entanglement protocols for function estimation, Phys. Rev. Re- search5, 033228 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    Pezz `e, M

    L. Pezz `e, M. A. Ciampini, N. Spagnolo, P. C. Humphreys, A. Datta, I. A. Walmsley, M. Barbieri, F. Sciarrino, and A. Smerzi, Optimal measurements for simultaneous quantum estimation of multiple phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 130504 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    W. Ge, K. Jacobs, Z. Eldredge, A. V . Gorshkov, and M. Foss- Feig, Distributed quantum metrology with linear networks and separable inputs, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 043604 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    T. J. Proctor, P. A. Knott, and J. A. Dunningham, Multiparam- eter estimation in networked quantum sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 080501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Gatto, P

    D. Gatto, P. Facchi, F. A. Narducci, and V . Tamma, Distributed quantum metrology with a single squeezed-vacuum source, Phys. Rev. Research1, 032024 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Malitesta, A

    M. Malitesta, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezz `e, Distributed quantum sensing with squeezed-vacuum light in a configurable array of Mach-Zehnder interferometers, Phys. Rev. A108, 032621 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Maleki and M

    Y . Maleki and M. S. Zubairy, Distributed phase estimation and networked quantum sensors with W-type quantum probes, Phys. Rev. A105, 032428 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Wang and G

    J. Wang and G. S. Agarwal, Exact quantum fisher matrix results for distributed phases using multiphoton polarization Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states, Phys. Rev. A111, 012414 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    K ´om´ar, E

    P. K ´om´ar, E. M. Kessler, M. Bishof, L. Jiang, A. S. Sørensen, J. Ye, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum network of clocks, Nat. Phys.10, 582 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Zhang and K

    L. Zhang and K. W. C. Chan, Quantum multiparameter estima- tion with generalized balanced multimode NOON-like states, Phys. Rev. A95, 032321 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Y . Xia, W. Li, W. Clark, D. Hart, Q. Zhuang, and Z. Zhang, Demonstration of a reconfigurable entangled radio-frequency photonic sensor network, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 150502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    X. Sun, W. Li, Y . Tian, F. Li, L. Tian, Y . Wang, and Y . Zheng, Quantum positioning and ranging via a distributed sensor net- work, Photonics Res.10, 2886 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Fujiwara and H

    A. Fujiwara and H. Nagaoka, Quantum fisher metric and esti- mation for pure state models, Phys. Lett. A201, 119 (1995)

    work page 1995

  41. [41]

    Petz and C

    D. Petz and C. Sud ´ar, Geometries of quantum states, J. Math. Phys.37, 2662 (1996)

    work page 1996

  42. [42]

    Petz, Monotone metrics on matrix spaces, Linear Algebra Appl.244, 81 (1996)

    D. Petz, Monotone metrics on matrix spaces, Linear Algebra Appl.244, 81 (1996)

    work page 1996

  43. [43]

    Yue, Y .-R

    J.-D. Yue, Y .-R. Zhang, and H. Fan, Quantum-enhanced metrol- ogy for multiple phase estimation with noise, Sci. Rep.4, 5933 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Liu, X.-X

    J. Liu, X.-X. Jing, and X. Wang, Quantum metrology with uni- tary parametrization processes, Sci. Rep.5, 8565 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    C. N. Gagatsos, D. Branford, and A. Datta, Gaussian systems for quantum-enhanced multiple phase estimation, Phys. Rev. A 94, 042342 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, Quantum fisher infor- mation matrix and multiparameter estimation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.53, 023001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Albarelli, M

    F. Albarelli, M. Barbieri, M. G. Genoni, and I. Gianani, A per- spective on multiparameter quantum metrology: From theoreti- cal tools to applications in quantum imaging, Phys. Lett. A384, 126311 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Matsumoto, A new approach to the Cram ´er-Rao-type bound of the pure-state model, J

    K. Matsumoto, A new approach to the Cram ´er-Rao-type bound of the pure-state model, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.35, 3111 (2002)

    work page 2002

  49. [49]

    S. Ragy, M. Jarzyna, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrza ´nski, Compat- ibility in multiparameter quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A94, 052108 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    P. C. Humphreys, M. Barbieri, A. Datta, and I. A. Walmsley, Quantum enhanced multiple phase estimation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 070403 (2013)

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    Liu, X.-M

    J. Liu, X.-M. Lu, Z. Sun, and X. Wang, Quantum multipa- rameter metrology with generalized entangled coherent state, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.49, 115302 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    S. Hong, J. ur Rehman, and Y .-S. Kim, Quantum enhanced multiple-phase estimation with multi-mode N00N states, Nat. Commun.12, 5211 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Liu, Y .-Z

    L.-Z. Liu, Y .-Z. Zhang, Z.-D. Li, R. Zhang, X.-F. Yin, Y .-Y . Fei, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, F. Xu, Y .-A. Chen, and J.-W. Pan, Distributed quantum phase estimation with entangled photons, Nat. Pho- tonics15, 137 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Zhao, Y .-Z

    S.-R. Zhao, Y .-Z. Zhang, W.-Z. Liu, J.-Y . Guan, W. Zhang, C.- L. Li, B. Bai, M.-H. Li, Y . Liu, L. You,et al., Field demon- stration of distributed quantum sensing without post-selection, Phys. Rev. X11, 031009 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    D.-H. Kim, S. Hong, Y .-S. Kim, Y . Kim, S.-W. Lee, R. C. Pooser, K. Oh, S.-Y . Lee, C. Lee, and H.-T. Lim, Distributed quantum sensing of multiple phases with fewer photons, Nat. Commun.15, 266 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer, Phys. Rev. D23, 1693 (1981)

    work page 1981

  57. [57]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, F. L. Moore, and D. J. Heinzen, Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A46, R6797 (1992)

    work page 1992

  58. [58]

    J. Ma, X. Wang, C.-P. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum spin squeez- ing, Phys. Rep.509, 89 (2011)

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    T ´oth and I

    G. T ´oth and I. Apellaniz, Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47, 424006 (2014)

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    Pezz `e, A

    L. Pezz `e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Zhuang, Z

    Q. Zhuang, Z. Zhang, and J. H. Shapiro, Distributed quantum sensing using continuous-variable multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. A97, 032329 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    X. Guo, C. R. Breum, J. Borregaard, S. Izumi, M. V . Larsen, T. Gehring, M. Christandl, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, and U. L. Andersen, Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous- variable entangled network, Nat. Phys.16, 281 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    C. Oh, C. Lee, S. H. Lie, and H. Jeong, Optimal distributed quantum sensing using Gaussian states, Phys. Rev. Research2, 023030 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Triggiani, P

    D. Triggiani, P. Facchi, and V . Tamma, Heisenberg scaling pre- cision in the estimation of functions of parameters in linear op- tical networks, Phys. Rev. A104, 062603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Gessner, A

    M. Gessner, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezz `e, Multiparameter squeez- ing for optimal quantum enhancements in sensor networks, Nat. Commun.11, 3817 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Malitesta, A

    M. Malitesta, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezz `e, Distributed quantum sensing with squeezed-vacuum light in a configurable array of Mach-Zehnder interferometers, Phys. Rev. A108, 032621 25 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Ge and K

    W. Ge and K. Jacobs, Heisenberg-limited continuous-variable distributed quantum metrology with arbitrary weights, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 100801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    J. Ma, J. Yan, S. Liang, Z. Yan, X. Jia, C. Xie, and K. Peng, High-sensitivity distributed quantum sensing of multimodal pa- rameters, Optica13, 541 (2026)

    work page 2026

  69. [69]

    A. I. Lvovsky and J. Mlynek, Quantum-optical catalysis: Gen- erating nonclassical states of light by means of linear optics, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 250401 (2002)

    work page 2002

  70. [70]

    Lipka-Bartosik, H

    P. Lipka-Bartosik, H. Wilming, and N. H. Y . Ng, Catalysis in quantum information theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 025005 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Datta, T

    C. Datta, T. V . Kondra, M. Miller, and A. Streltsov, Catalysis of entanglement and other quantum resources, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 116002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    Hu, J.-N

    L.-Y . Hu, J.-N. Wu, Z. Liao, and M. S. Zubairy, Multiphoton catalysis with coherent state input: Nonclassicality and deco- herence, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.49, 175504 (2016)

    work page 2016

  73. [73]

    L. Hu, Z. Liao, and M. S. Zubairy, Continuous-variable entan- glement via multiphoton catalysis, Phys. Rev. A95, 012310 (2017)

    work page 2017

  74. [74]

    F. Jia, W. Ye, Q. Wang, L.-Y . Hu, and H.-Y . Fan, Comparison of nonclassical properties resulting from non-Gaussian operations, Laser Phys. Lett.16, 015201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    Zhang, W

    H. Zhang, W. Ye, C. Wei, Y . Xia, S. Chang, Z. Liao, and L. Hu, Improved phase sensitivity in a quantum optical interferome- ter based on multiphoton catalytic two-mode squeezed vacuum states, Phys. Rev. A103, 013705 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    Z. Zhao, Q. Kang, H. Zhang, T. Zhao, C. Liu, and L. Hu, Phase estimation via coherent and photon-catalyzed squeezed vacuum states, Opt. Express32, 28267 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    Zhang, W

    H. Zhang, W. Ye, S. Chang, Y . Xia, L. Hu, and Z. Liao, Quan- tum multiparameter estimation with multi-mode photon cataly- sis entangled squeezed state, Front. Phys.18, 42304 (2023)

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    T. J. Bartley, G. Donati, J. B. Spring, X.-M. Jin, M. Barbieri, A. Datta, B. J. Smith, and I. A. Walmsley, Multiphoton state engineering by heralded interference between single photons and coherent states, Phys. Rev. A86, 043820 (2012)

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    Vahlbruch, M

    H. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, De- tection of 15 db squeezed states of light and their application for the absolute calibration of photoelectric quantum efficiency, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 110801 (2016)

    work page 2016

  80. [80]

    V ourdas and J

    A. V ourdas and J. A. Dunningham, Fourier multiport devices, Phys. Rev. A71, 013809 (2005)

    work page 2005

Showing first 80 references.