Giant nonlinear conductivity in 2D electron gas from substrate-induced dipolar scattering

Alexander Seidel; Dmitry V. Chichinadze; Zohar Nussinov

arxiv: 2605.20699 · v1 · pith:XOIOP3VCnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.quant-gas

Giant nonlinear conductivity in 2D electron gas from substrate-induced dipolar scattering

Dmitry V. Chichinadze , Alexander Seidel , Zohar Nussinov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 04:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gas

keywords nonlinear conductivity2D electron gasdipolar scatteringsubstrate-induced dipolesvan der Waals heterostructureskinematic constraintsnonlinear transport

0 comments

The pith

Substrate-induced dipoles produce giant nonlinear conductivity in 2D electron gases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to resolve why 2D van der Waals heterostructures exhibit nonlinear conductivities larger than 1 μm/ΩV, a scale that standard theories cannot explain. It introduces scattering of electrons from a periodic array of dipoles induced by the substrate as the responsible mechanism. Because scattering is confined to two dimensions, kinematic constraints become very restrictive and cause a strong enhancement of the nonlinear response. This leads to a fundamental scale of 1 μm/ΩV without fine tuning. Readers would care as it offers a parameter-free explanation for recent experimental reports.

Core claim

The strict kinematic constraints inherent to 2D scattering from a substrate-induced periodic dipole array lead to a singular enhancement of the nonlinear response, fundamentally dictating a natural scale of 1 μm/ΩV.

What carries the argument

Scattering from a substrate-induced periodic dipole array, which imposes strict kinematic constraints on 2D electrons and thereby enhances nonlinear conductivity.

Load-bearing premise

A periodic array of dipoles is induced by the substrate and dominates the scattering processes in the 2D electron gas.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the nonlinear conductivity in a 2D electron gas on a substrate engineered to lack periodic dipoles, expecting values much smaller than 1 μm/ΩV if the mechanism is correct.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20699 by Alexander Seidel, Dmitry V. Chichinadze, Zohar Nussinov.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (Left) Linear conductivity as a function of dipole moment. (Middle) Components of the nonlinear conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Despite a surge of interest in the nonlinear transport in 2D materials, a fundamental puzzle remains: existing theoretical frameworks are unable to quantitatively account for the giant nonlinear conductivities ($\gtrsim 1 \frac{\mu \text{m}}{\Omega \text{V}}$) recently reported in 2D van der Waals heterostructures. Here, we introduce a mechanism based on electron scattering from a substrate-induced periodic dipole array. We show that the strict kinematic constraints, inherent to 2D scattering, lead to a singular enhancement of the nonlinear response, fundamentally dictating a natural scale of $1 \frac{\mu \text{m}}{\Omega \text{V}}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper's main claim is a kinematic singularity from 2D scattering off a periodic substrate dipole array that sets the nonlinear conductivity scale at ~1 μm/ΩV, but this hinges on an unproven assumption that such an array dominates.

read the letter

The central takeaway is that this work tries to explain the giant nonlinear conductivities seen in 2D van der Waals systems by pointing to scattering from a substrate-induced periodic dipole array. The 2D kinematics are said to create a singular enhancement that naturally produces the observed scale without extra parameters. That is the punchline worth checking first. The paper does something useful by focusing on how strict phase-space limits in two dimensions can amplify nonlinear response in a way that prior models apparently missed. It attempts a direct link between the scattering geometry and the magnitude, which is a cleaner approach than adding adjustable strengths. If the derivations hold up in the full text, this gives a concrete mechanism rather than a generic fit. The soft spot is the premise that a periodic dipole array actually exists and dominates over other scatterers like Coulomb impurities or interface roughness. The abstract states this but the stress-test note flags the lack of a first-principles estimate or self-consistent condition for typical heterostructures. If the dipoles turn out random or screened, the singularity and the fixed scale both go away. That assumption carries most of the weight, so any referee would need to see explicit checks against competing mechanisms. This paper is aimed at condensed-matter theorists working on nonlinear transport in 2D electron gases. Readers who want ideas for new scattering channels in van der Waals stacks could find it worth their time. It deserves a serious referee because it directly addresses a quantitative gap between theory and experiment, even if the central assumption needs more support. I would recommend sending it to peer review rather than desk rejection.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mechanism to explain giant nonlinear conductivities (≳1 μm/ΩV) observed in 2D van der Waals heterostructures. It introduces electron scattering from a substrate-induced periodic dipole array and argues that the strict kinematic constraints inherent to 2D scattering produce a singular enhancement of the nonlinear response, which fundamentally sets a natural scale of 1 μm/ΩV.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work would resolve a quantitative discrepancy between existing theory and experiment in nonlinear transport of 2D materials by identifying a substrate-driven mechanism whose scale is dictated by 2D phase-space restrictions rather than adjustable parameters. The parameter-free character of the predicted scale is a notable strength if the underlying scattering dominance can be established.

major comments (1)

The central claim that kinematic constraints produce a singular enhancement with a fixed natural scale of 1 μm/ΩV rests on the premise that scattering is dominated by a periodic array of substrate-induced dipoles whose periodicity is commensurate with the 2DEG. The abstract asserts that this array “exists and dominates” but supplies no first-principles estimate of dipole strength, no self-consistent condition for periodicity, and no comparison showing that this mechanism outcompetes Coulomb impurities, phonons, or interface roughness in typical van-der-Waals heterostructures. Without such justification the phase-space restrictions invoked for the singularity do not necessarily operate, undermining the headline result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The major comment raises an important point regarding the justification for the dominance of the proposed scattering mechanism. We respond point by point below and outline the changes we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim that kinematic constraints produce a singular enhancement with a fixed natural scale of 1 μm/ΩV rests on the premise that scattering is dominated by a periodic array of substrate-induced dipoles whose periodicity is commensurate with the 2DEG. The abstract asserts that this array “exists and dominates” but supplies no first-principles estimate of dipole strength, no self-consistent condition for periodicity, and no comparison showing that this mechanism outcompetes Coulomb impurities, phonons, or interface roughness in typical van-der-Waals heterostructures. Without such justification the phase-space restrictions invoked for the singularity do not necessarily operate, undermining the headline result.

Authors: We agree that the abstract phrasing 'exists and dominates' is too assertive and lacks supporting analysis, which could mislead readers about the scope of the claim. The central result of the manuscript is that, under the assumption of dominant scattering from a commensurate periodic dipole array, the strict 2D kinematic constraints (restricted phase space for scattering processes) produce a singular enhancement of the nonlinear conductivity, naturally fixing its scale at ~1 μm/ΩV independent of microscopic details such as dipole moment magnitude. This scale follows from dimensional analysis and the form of the 2D scattering matrix elements rather than adjustable parameters. We do not claim this mechanism always dominates in all heterostructures; instead, we propose it as a candidate to resolve the quantitative discrepancy with experiment. In the revised manuscript we will (i) rephrase the abstract and introduction to emphasize the conditional nature of the result ('we propose a mechanism...'), (ii) add a new subsection providing order-of-magnitude estimates of dipole strength based on typical substrate polarizations and lattice commensurability arguments, and (iii) include a qualitative discussion comparing the expected scattering rate to Coulomb, phonon, and roughness contributions in representative van der Waals systems. These changes will make the assumptions explicit while preserving the core theoretical finding on the kinematic origin of the scale. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

A full first-principles ab initio calculation of substrate-induced dipole moments, self-consistent determination of periodicity, and quantitative scattering-rate comparisons across multiple mechanisms for specific material stacks.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on independent kinematic analysis under stated mechanism

full rationale

The paper introduces a substrate-induced periodic dipole array as the scattering mechanism and then applies 2D kinematic constraints to derive a singular enhancement that sets the scale of the nonlinear conductivity. No equations or steps in the provided text reduce the claimed natural scale of 1 μm/ΩV to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or redefinition of inputs. The result is presented as emerging from phase-space restrictions inherent to 2D scattering once the mechanism is assumed, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks rather than tautological. The premise of dipole dominance is an assumption open to experimental test but does not create circularity in the subsequent calculation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the periodic dipole array is presented as substrate-induced rather than postulated ad hoc.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5650 in / 1025 out tokens · 20906 ms · 2026-05-21T04:05:54.628282+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

[1]

The dependence on the screening length is logarith- mic, and for these parameters, the linear conductivity isσ∼20 e2 ℏ , which is well within the realistic range. In contrasttootherproposedmechanisms, theenhancement here is a consequence of the physical scattering anomaly, which fundamentally dictates theµm ΩV scale independently of specific parameter tun...

work page
[2]

Genkin and P

V. Genkin and P. Mednis, Contribution to the theory of nonlinear effects in crystals with account taken of par- tially filled bands, Sov. Phys. JETP27, 609 (1968)

work page 1968
[3]

Onoda, N

S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of non-equilibirum states driven by constant electromag- netic fields: Non-commutative quantum mechanics in the keldysh formalism, Progress of Theoretical Physics116, 61 (2006)

work page 2006
[4]

Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 166601 (2014)

work page 2014
[5]

Sodemann and L

I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

Morimoto and N

T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal current from electron interactions in noncentrosymmetric crys- tals: roles of time reversal symmetry and dissipation, Scientific Reports8, 2973 (2018)

work page 2018
[7]

E. J. König, M. Dzero, A. Levchenko, and D. A. Pesin, Gyrotropic hall effect in berry-curved materials, Phys. Rev. B99, 155404 (2019)

work page 2019
[8]

Isobe, S.-Y

H. Isobe, S.-Y. Xu, and L. Fu, High- frequency rectification via chiral bloch elec- trons, Science Advances6, eaay2497 (2020), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aay2497

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay2497 2020
[9]

C. Wang, Y. Gao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic nonlinear hall effectinantiferromagnetictetragonalcumnas,Phys.Rev. Lett.127, 277201 (2021)

work page 2021
[10]

Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Quantum theory of the nonlinear hall effect, Nature Communications12, 5038 (2021)

work page 2021
[11]

Du, C.-H

Z. Du, C.-H. Wang, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Nonlinear Hall effects, Nature Reviews Physics3, 744 (2021)

work page 2021
[12]

C. Ortix, Nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symmetry: Theory and material realizations, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021), https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qute.202100056

work page doi:10.1002/qute.202100056 2021
[13]

Freimuth, S

F. Freimuth, S. Blügel, and Y. Mokrousov, Theory of unidirectional magnetoresistance and nonlinear hall ef- 6 fect, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter34, 055301 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agar- wal, Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B108, L201405 (2023)

work page 2023
[15]

R. B. Atencia, D. Xiao, and D. Culcer, Disorder in the nonlinear anomalous hall effect ofPT-symmetric dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B108, L201115 (2023)

work page 2023
[16]

Suárez-Rodriguez, F

M. Suárez-Rodriguez, F. De Juan, I. Souza, M. Gobbi, F. Casanova, and L. E. Hueso, Non-linear transport in non-centrosymmetric systems: From fundamentals to ap- plications, Nature Materials24, 1005 (2025)

work page 2025
[17]

P. He, G. K. W. Koon, H. Isobe, J. Y. Tan, J. Hu, A. H. C. Neto, L. Fu, and H. Yang, Graphene moiré superlattices with giant quantum nonlinearity of chiral bloch electrons, Nature Nanotechnology17, 378 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

D. V. Chichinadze, N. J. Zhang, J.-X. Lin, E. Morissette, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, O. Vafek, and J. I. A. Li, Observation of giant nonlinear hall conductiv- ity in bernal bilayer graphene (2025), arXiv:2411.11156 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Leadbeater, R

M. Leadbeater, R. Raimondi, P. Schwab, and C. Castel- lani, Non-linear conductivity and quantum interference in disordered metals, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems15, 277 (2000)

work page 2000
[20]

Schwab and R

P. Schwab and R. Raimondi, Coherent transport in disor- dered metals out of equilibrium, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems24, 525 (2001)

work page 2001
[21]

D. V. Chichinadze, Weak localization and antilocaliza- tion corrections to nonlinear transport: a semiclassi- cal boltzmann treatment (2025), arXiv:2510.02684 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Gorbatsevich, Y

A. Gorbatsevich, Y. V. Kopaev, and V. Tugushev, Anomalous nonlinear effects at phase transitions to fer- roelectric and magnetoelectric states, Sov. Phys.-JETP 58, 643 (1983)

work page 1983
[24]

Belinicher, V

V. Belinicher, V. Malinovskii, and B. Sturman, Photogal- vanic effect in a crystal with polar axis, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics46, 362 (1977)

work page 1977
[25]

V. I. Belinicher and B. I. Sturman, The photogalvanic ef- fectinmedialackingacenterofsymmetry,SovietPhysics Uspekhi23, 199 (1980)

work page 1980
[26]

Yasuda, X

K. Yasuda, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Stacking-engineered ferroelectric- ity in bilayer boron nitride, Science372, 1458 (2021), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abd3230

work page doi:10.1126/science.abd3230 2021
[27]

Zhang, J

L. Zhang, J. Ding, H. Xiang, N. Liu, W. Zhou, L. Wu, N. Xin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and S. Xu, Elec- tronic ferroelectricity in monolayer graphene moiré su- perlattices, Nature Communications15, 10905 (2024)

work page 2024
[28]

Li and M

L. Li and M. Wu, Binary compound bilayer and multi- layer with vertical polarizations: Two-dimensional ferro- electrics, multiferroics, and nanogenerators, ACS Nano 11, 6382 (2017)

work page 2017
[29]

Bennett, G

D. Bennett, G. Chaudhary, R.-J. Slager, E. Bous- quet, and P. Ghosez, Polar meron-antimeron networks in strained and twisted bilayers, Nature Communications 14, 1629 (2023)

work page 2023
[30]

Bennett, W

D. Bennett, W. J. Jankowski, G. Chaudhary, E. Kaxi- ras, and R.-J. Slager, Theory of polarization textures in crystal supercells, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033216 (2023)

work page 2023
[31]

I. I. Naumov, L. Bellaiche, and H. Fu, Unusual phase transitions in ferroelectric nanodisks and nanorods, Na- ture432, 737 (2004)

work page 2004
[32]

Yadav, C

A. Yadav, C. Nelson, S. Hsu, Z. Hong, J. Clarkson, C. Schlepütz, A. Damodaran, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz, L. Dedon,et al., Observation of polar vortices in oxide superlattices, Nature530, 198 (2016)

work page 2016
[33]

A. R. Damodaran, J. D. Clarkson, Z. Hong, H. Liu, A. K. Yadav, C. T. Nelson, S.-L. Hsu, M. R. Mc- Carter, K.-D. Park, V. Kravtsov, A. Farhan, Y. Dong, Z.Cai, H.Zhou, P.Aguado-Puente, P.García-Fernández, J. Íñiguez, J. Junquera, A. Scholl, M. B. Raschke, L.-Q. Chen, D. D. Fong, R. Ramesh, and L. W. Martin, Phase coexistence and electric-field control of to...

work page 2017
[34]

Shafer, P

P. Shafer, P. Garcia-Fernández, P. Aguado-Puente, A. R. Damodaran, A. K. Yadav, C. T. Nelson, S.-L. Hsu, J. C. Wojdeł, J. Í. niguez, L. W. Martin, E. Arenholz, J. Jun- quera, and R. Ramesh, Emergent chirality in the electric polarization texture of titanate superlattices, Proceed- ingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences115,915(2018), https://www.pnas.org/doi/p...

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1711652115 2018
[35]

B. Zhao, G. Y. Jung, S. Singh, R. B. Smith, H. Chen, G. Ren, C. Wang, S. Termos, S. T. Holmes, F. Mentink- Vigier, W. Zhang, Z. Du, C. Wu, M. J. Swamynad- han, Q. Zhao, K. Ye, D. A. Walko, N. S. Settineri, S. J. Teat, L. Zhao, R. W. Schurko, H. Wen, R. Mishra, andJ.Ravichandran,Emergentatomic-scalepolarization vortices, Advanced Materials36, 2311559 (2024)

work page 2024
[36]

Ranga, S

P. Ranga, S. B. Cho, R. Mishra, and S. Krishnamoorthy, Highly tunable, polarization-engineered two-dimensional electron gas inϵ-al2o3/ϵ-ga2o3 heterostructures, Applied Physics Express13, 061009 (2020)

work page 2020
[37]

P. He, M. Zhang, Y.-X. Huang, J. Li, R. Wang, S. Zhao, C. Pan, Y. Gao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, J. Hu, Y. Zhu, C. Xiao, X. C. Xie, S. A. Yang, and J. Shen, Giant field-tunable nonlinear hall effect by lorentz skew scattering in a graphene moire superlattice (2025), arXiv:2511.03381 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

V. M. Fridkin and B. N. Popov, Anomalous photovoltaic effect in ferroelectrics, Soviet Physics Uspekhi21, 981 (1978)

work page 1978
[39]

B. I. Sturman, Collision integral for elastic scattering of electrons and phonons, Soviet Physics Uspekhi27, 881 (1984)

work page 1984
[40]

Kryhin and L

S. Kryhin and L. Levitov, Collinear scattering and long- lived excitations in two-dimensional electron fluids, Phys. Rev. B107, L201404 (2023)

work page 2023
[41]

Kryhin, Q

S. Kryhin, Q. Hong, and L. Levitov, Linear-in- temperature conductance in two-dimensional electron fluids, Phys. Rev. B111, L081403 (2025)

work page 2025
[42]

K. G. Nazaryan and L. Levitov, Nonlocal conductivity, continued fractions, and current vortices in electron flu- ids, Phys. Rev. B110, 045147 (2024)

work page 2024
[43]

J. Duan, Y. Jian, Y. Gao, H. Peng, J. Zhong, Q. Feng, and Y. Yao, Giant second-order nonlinearity in twisted bilayer graphene (2022), arXiv:2201.09274 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

Kuramoto, Electronic higher multipoles in solids, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement176, 77 (2008)

Y. Kuramoto, Electronic higher multipoles in solids, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement176, 77 (2008)

work page 2008
[45]

Kuramoto, H

Y. Kuramoto, H. Kusunose, and A. Kiss, Multipole or- ders and fluctuations in strongly correlated electron sys- 7 tems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan78, 072001 (2009)

work page 2009
[46]

Santini, S

P. Santini, S. Carretta, G. Amoretti, R. Caciuffo, N. Magnani, and G. H. Lander, Multipolar interactions inf-electron systems: The paradigm of actinide dioxides, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 807 (2009)

work page 2009
[47]

V. A. Zenin, C. E. Garcia-Ortiz, A. B. Evlyukhin, Y. Yang, R. Malureanu, S. M. Novikov, V. Coello, B. N. Chichkov, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, A. V. Lavrinenko, and N. A. Mortensen, Engineering nanoparticles with pure high-order multipole scattering, ACS Photonics7, 1067 (2020)

work page 2020

[1] [1]

The dependence on the screening length is logarith- mic, and for these parameters, the linear conductivity isσ∼20 e2 ℏ , which is well within the realistic range. In contrasttootherproposedmechanisms, theenhancement here is a consequence of the physical scattering anomaly, which fundamentally dictates theµm ΩV scale independently of specific parameter tun...

work page

[2] [2]

Genkin and P

V. Genkin and P. Mednis, Contribution to the theory of nonlinear effects in crystals with account taken of par- tially filled bands, Sov. Phys. JETP27, 609 (1968)

work page 1968

[3] [3]

Onoda, N

S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of non-equilibirum states driven by constant electromag- netic fields: Non-commutative quantum mechanics in the keldysh formalism, Progress of Theoretical Physics116, 61 (2006)

work page 2006

[4] [4]

Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Field induced positional shift of bloch electrons and its dynamical implications, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 166601 (2014)

work page 2014

[5] [5]

Sodemann and L

I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal in- variant materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

work page 2015

[6] [6]

Morimoto and N

T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal current from electron interactions in noncentrosymmetric crys- tals: roles of time reversal symmetry and dissipation, Scientific Reports8, 2973 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [7]

E. J. König, M. Dzero, A. Levchenko, and D. A. Pesin, Gyrotropic hall effect in berry-curved materials, Phys. Rev. B99, 155404 (2019)

work page 2019

[8] [8]

Isobe, S.-Y

H. Isobe, S.-Y. Xu, and L. Fu, High- frequency rectification via chiral bloch elec- trons, Science Advances6, eaay2497 (2020), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aay2497

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay2497 2020

[9] [9]

C. Wang, Y. Gao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic nonlinear hall effectinantiferromagnetictetragonalcumnas,Phys.Rev. Lett.127, 277201 (2021)

work page 2021

[10] [10]

Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Quantum theory of the nonlinear hall effect, Nature Communications12, 5038 (2021)

work page 2021

[11] [11]

Du, C.-H

Z. Du, C.-H. Wang, H.-P. Sun, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Nonlinear Hall effects, Nature Reviews Physics3, 744 (2021)

work page 2021

[12] [12]

C. Ortix, Nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symmetry: Theory and material realizations, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021), https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/qute.202100056

work page doi:10.1002/qute.202100056 2021

[13] [13]

Freimuth, S

F. Freimuth, S. Blügel, and Y. Mokrousov, Theory of unidirectional magnetoresistance and nonlinear hall ef- 6 fect, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter34, 055301 (2022)

work page 2022

[14] [14]

K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agar- wal, Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B108, L201405 (2023)

work page 2023

[15] [15]

R. B. Atencia, D. Xiao, and D. Culcer, Disorder in the nonlinear anomalous hall effect ofPT-symmetric dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B108, L201115 (2023)

work page 2023

[16] [16]

Suárez-Rodriguez, F

M. Suárez-Rodriguez, F. De Juan, I. Souza, M. Gobbi, F. Casanova, and L. E. Hueso, Non-linear transport in non-centrosymmetric systems: From fundamentals to ap- plications, Nature Materials24, 1005 (2025)

work page 2025

[17] [17]

P. He, G. K. W. Koon, H. Isobe, J. Y. Tan, J. Hu, A. H. C. Neto, L. Fu, and H. Yang, Graphene moiré superlattices with giant quantum nonlinearity of chiral bloch electrons, Nature Nanotechnology17, 378 (2022)

work page 2022

[18] [18]

D. V. Chichinadze, N. J. Zhang, J.-X. Lin, E. Morissette, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, O. Vafek, and J. I. A. Li, Observation of giant nonlinear hall conductiv- ity in bernal bilayer graphene (2025), arXiv:2411.11156 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2025

[19] [19]

Leadbeater, R

M. Leadbeater, R. Raimondi, P. Schwab, and C. Castel- lani, Non-linear conductivity and quantum interference in disordered metals, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems15, 277 (2000)

work page 2000

[20] [20]

Schwab and R

P. Schwab and R. Raimondi, Coherent transport in disor- dered metals out of equilibrium, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems24, 525 (2001)

work page 2001

[21] [21]

D. V. Chichinadze, Weak localization and antilocaliza- tion corrections to nonlinear transport: a semiclassi- cal boltzmann treatment (2025), arXiv:2510.02684 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2025

[22] [23]

Gorbatsevich, Y

A. Gorbatsevich, Y. V. Kopaev, and V. Tugushev, Anomalous nonlinear effects at phase transitions to fer- roelectric and magnetoelectric states, Sov. Phys.-JETP 58, 643 (1983)

work page 1983

[23] [24]

Belinicher, V

V. Belinicher, V. Malinovskii, and B. Sturman, Photogal- vanic effect in a crystal with polar axis, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics46, 362 (1977)

work page 1977

[24] [25]

V. I. Belinicher and B. I. Sturman, The photogalvanic ef- fectinmedialackingacenterofsymmetry,SovietPhysics Uspekhi23, 199 (1980)

work page 1980

[25] [26]

Yasuda, X

K. Yasuda, X. Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Stacking-engineered ferroelectric- ity in bilayer boron nitride, Science372, 1458 (2021), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abd3230

work page doi:10.1126/science.abd3230 2021

[26] [27]

Zhang, J

L. Zhang, J. Ding, H. Xiang, N. Liu, W. Zhou, L. Wu, N. Xin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and S. Xu, Elec- tronic ferroelectricity in monolayer graphene moiré su- perlattices, Nature Communications15, 10905 (2024)

work page 2024

[27] [28]

Li and M

L. Li and M. Wu, Binary compound bilayer and multi- layer with vertical polarizations: Two-dimensional ferro- electrics, multiferroics, and nanogenerators, ACS Nano 11, 6382 (2017)

work page 2017

[28] [29]

Bennett, G

D. Bennett, G. Chaudhary, R.-J. Slager, E. Bous- quet, and P. Ghosez, Polar meron-antimeron networks in strained and twisted bilayers, Nature Communications 14, 1629 (2023)

work page 2023

[29] [30]

Bennett, W

D. Bennett, W. J. Jankowski, G. Chaudhary, E. Kaxi- ras, and R.-J. Slager, Theory of polarization textures in crystal supercells, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033216 (2023)

work page 2023

[30] [31]

I. I. Naumov, L. Bellaiche, and H. Fu, Unusual phase transitions in ferroelectric nanodisks and nanorods, Na- ture432, 737 (2004)

work page 2004

[31] [32]

Yadav, C

A. Yadav, C. Nelson, S. Hsu, Z. Hong, J. Clarkson, C. Schlepütz, A. Damodaran, P. Shafer, E. Arenholz, L. Dedon,et al., Observation of polar vortices in oxide superlattices, Nature530, 198 (2016)

work page 2016

[32] [33]

A. R. Damodaran, J. D. Clarkson, Z. Hong, H. Liu, A. K. Yadav, C. T. Nelson, S.-L. Hsu, M. R. Mc- Carter, K.-D. Park, V. Kravtsov, A. Farhan, Y. Dong, Z.Cai, H.Zhou, P.Aguado-Puente, P.García-Fernández, J. Íñiguez, J. Junquera, A. Scholl, M. B. Raschke, L.-Q. Chen, D. D. Fong, R. Ramesh, and L. W. Martin, Phase coexistence and electric-field control of to...

work page 2017

[33] [34]

Shafer, P

P. Shafer, P. Garcia-Fernández, P. Aguado-Puente, A. R. Damodaran, A. K. Yadav, C. T. Nelson, S.-L. Hsu, J. C. Wojdeł, J. Í. niguez, L. W. Martin, E. Arenholz, J. Jun- quera, and R. Ramesh, Emergent chirality in the electric polarization texture of titanate superlattices, Proceed- ingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences115,915(2018), https://www.pnas.org/doi/p...

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1711652115 2018

[34] [35]

B. Zhao, G. Y. Jung, S. Singh, R. B. Smith, H. Chen, G. Ren, C. Wang, S. Termos, S. T. Holmes, F. Mentink- Vigier, W. Zhang, Z. Du, C. Wu, M. J. Swamynad- han, Q. Zhao, K. Ye, D. A. Walko, N. S. Settineri, S. J. Teat, L. Zhao, R. W. Schurko, H. Wen, R. Mishra, andJ.Ravichandran,Emergentatomic-scalepolarization vortices, Advanced Materials36, 2311559 (2024)

work page 2024

[35] [36]

Ranga, S

P. Ranga, S. B. Cho, R. Mishra, and S. Krishnamoorthy, Highly tunable, polarization-engineered two-dimensional electron gas inϵ-al2o3/ϵ-ga2o3 heterostructures, Applied Physics Express13, 061009 (2020)

work page 2020

[36] [37]

P. He, M. Zhang, Y.-X. Huang, J. Li, R. Wang, S. Zhao, C. Pan, Y. Gao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, J. Hu, Y. Zhu, C. Xiao, X. C. Xie, S. A. Yang, and J. Shen, Giant field-tunable nonlinear hall effect by lorentz skew scattering in a graphene moire superlattice (2025), arXiv:2511.03381 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2025

[37] [38]

V. M. Fridkin and B. N. Popov, Anomalous photovoltaic effect in ferroelectrics, Soviet Physics Uspekhi21, 981 (1978)

work page 1978

[38] [39]

B. I. Sturman, Collision integral for elastic scattering of electrons and phonons, Soviet Physics Uspekhi27, 881 (1984)

work page 1984

[39] [40]

Kryhin and L

S. Kryhin and L. Levitov, Collinear scattering and long- lived excitations in two-dimensional electron fluids, Phys. Rev. B107, L201404 (2023)

work page 2023

[40] [41]

Kryhin, Q

S. Kryhin, Q. Hong, and L. Levitov, Linear-in- temperature conductance in two-dimensional electron fluids, Phys. Rev. B111, L081403 (2025)

work page 2025

[41] [42]

K. G. Nazaryan and L. Levitov, Nonlocal conductivity, continued fractions, and current vortices in electron flu- ids, Phys. Rev. B110, 045147 (2024)

work page 2024

[42] [43]

J. Duan, Y. Jian, Y. Gao, H. Peng, J. Zhong, Q. Feng, and Y. Yao, Giant second-order nonlinearity in twisted bilayer graphene (2022), arXiv:2201.09274 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2022

[43] [44]

Kuramoto, Electronic higher multipoles in solids, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement176, 77 (2008)

Y. Kuramoto, Electronic higher multipoles in solids, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement176, 77 (2008)

work page 2008

[44] [45]

Kuramoto, H

Y. Kuramoto, H. Kusunose, and A. Kiss, Multipole or- ders and fluctuations in strongly correlated electron sys- 7 tems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan78, 072001 (2009)

work page 2009

[45] [46]

Santini, S

P. Santini, S. Carretta, G. Amoretti, R. Caciuffo, N. Magnani, and G. H. Lander, Multipolar interactions inf-electron systems: The paradigm of actinide dioxides, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 807 (2009)

work page 2009

[46] [47]

V. A. Zenin, C. E. Garcia-Ortiz, A. B. Evlyukhin, Y. Yang, R. Malureanu, S. M. Novikov, V. Coello, B. N. Chichkov, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, A. V. Lavrinenko, and N. A. Mortensen, Engineering nanoparticles with pure high-order multipole scattering, ACS Photonics7, 1067 (2020)

work page 2020