pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21735 · v1 · pith:Q2YCQKJ6new · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Milky Way Mapper decoded abundances -- II: From patterns to paths

Melissa K. Ness , Sarah Aquilina , Jennifer Mead , Emily Griffith , Catherine Manea , Jonathan Bird , Andrew R. Casey , Lucy (Yuxi) Lu
show 9 more authors
Kathryn V. Johnston Michael R. Blanton James W. Johnson Maja Jablonska Leticia Carigi Jos\'e G. Fern\'andez-Trincado Ricardo L\'opez Valdivia Ying-Yi Song Juna Kollmeier
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 08:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Milky Way discstellar abundanceschemical evolutionenrichment patternsalpha bimodalitygalactic archaeologyred giant stars
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Milky Way disc's abundances reduce to four shared enrichment patterns that trace continuous pathways tied to position, age, and dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper re-projects 16 measured abundances from nearly 200,000 red giant stars into four shared enrichment patterns. These patterns vary coherently across the disc and define pathways that align closely with spatial location, stellar age, and orbital properties. The well-known split in alpha-element abundances appears inside this single low-dimensional structure as stars move along continuous sequences of changing pattern contributions rather than as two distinct groups. A clear shift occurs around 6 billion years ago when contributions from delayed enrichment sources increase and the disc becomes more chemically mixed. The resulting framework directly connects chemical evolution to the disc's radial growth and its response to dynamical events.

Core claim

By decomposing 16 stellar abundances into four shared enrichment patterns, the Milky Way disc exhibits coherent enrichment pathways whose relative contributions vary systematically with position in the disc. These pathways are stratified by age and height above the plane, display a transition at approximately 6 Gyr toward greater contributions from delayed sources, and account for the observed alpha-bimodality through continuous sequences of changing enrichment fractions that remain tightly coupled to spatial, temporal, and orbital coordinates.

What carries the argument

Four shared enrichment patterns obtained by re-projecting 16 stellar abundances into a low-dimensional basis that serves as a generative framework for the disc's chemical structure.

If this is right

  • The relative contributions of the four patterns respond coherently to global drivers of disc evolution.
  • Grouping stars by pattern contributions produces pathways that show strong correlations with location, age, and height above the plane.
  • Stars at similar positions along these pathways exhibit coherent vertical deviations across radius, capturing the disc's response to dynamical perturbations.
  • A transition at roughly 6 Gyr marks the onset of a more chemically mixed regime with rising contributions from delayed sources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Chemical evolution models could be simplified by treating abundances as mixtures of these four patterns while still predicting observed spatial and age trends.
  • Disc formation simulations should be tested against whether they naturally produce continuous enrichment sequences coupled to dynamics rather than discrete thin and thick disc populations.
  • The same decomposition applied to abundance data from other galaxies could check whether four-pattern structures are a common outcome of disc evolution.

Load-bearing premise

The 16 measured abundances can be faithfully represented by linear combinations of only four shared enrichment patterns without losing critical information about distinct nucleosynthetic channels or selection effects in the sample.

What would settle it

An independent sample of stars with measured abundances, ages, and positions would falsify the claim if grouping them by the same four patterns fails to recover the reported chemo-spatial correlations, age stratification, or continuous sequences through the alpha bimodality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21735 by Andrew R. Casey, Catherine Manea, Emily Griffith, James W. Johnson, Jennifer Mead, Jonathan Bird, Jos\'e G. Fern\'andez-Trincado, Juna Kollmeier, Kathryn V. Johnston, Leticia Carigi, Lucy (Yuxi) Lu, Maja Jablonska, Melissa K. Ness, Michael R. Blanton, Ricardo L\'opez Valdivia, Sarah Aquilina, Ying-Yi Song.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spatial distribution of the fractional contribution of each latent enrichment channel across the Galactic disc. Top row: face-on (𝑥, 𝑦) view coloured by the per-star fractional contribution to Channels 1–4 for stars |𝑧 | < 1.5 kpc from the disc to show radial gradients in the mid-plane (≈ 160, 519 stars). Bottom row: edge-on (𝑅, 𝑧) distribution for the ≈ 169, 443 stars. The colours reflect the value of the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mean fractional contribution of each NMF enrichment channel as a function of Galactocentric radius for stars with |𝑧 | < 3 kpc. Coloured points show the data in 0.5 kpc radial bins with standard-error uncertainties. The coloured lines show the best-fitting five-mode damped radial model, in which all channels share the same set of radial basis functions and differ only in their linear coefficients. The mode… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The evolution of the abundance plane and latent enrichment fractions as a function of age and height above the Galactic plane. The bins in |𝑧 | (in kpc) corresponding to the different lines are indicated in the left-most panel. Left: Running mean of [Mg/Fe] versus stellar age, shown separately in bins of vertical height |𝑧 |. Middle: Difference between the latent fractions associated with the SN Ia- and SN… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Chemo-dynamical properties of the 1,497 stellar groups defined by their NMF latent pattern fractions (rows 2–5), contrasted with the background density distribution of all stars used to construct the groups (top row). Each group is coloured by its fractional contribution to one representative latent channel: 𝑓ch1 (second row), 𝑓ch2 (third row), 𝑓ch3 (fourth row), and 𝑓Ch4 (fifth row). These channels corres… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The 1,497 k-means clusters are shown as a function of their mean stellar age. The left and middle panels display the intrinsic abundance dispersion within each cluster in [Fe/H] and [Mg/Fe], respectively, after accounting for measurement uncertainties. Clusters are colour-coded by the mean contribution of the associated enrichment channel. In both abundance dimensions, the intrinsic dispersion increases at… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The spatial and dynamical behaviour of the empirical enrichment paths of the k-means clusters. Left: paths of [Fe/H] versus Galactocentric radius 𝑅gal, colored by age. There is a strong correlation between the trajectory gradients and age and an inversion of the gradient for older stars. Right: Angular momentum 𝐿𝑧 versus eccentricity, colored by mean |𝑧 |, revealing dynamical structure, whereby eccentricit… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top Left: Vertical–radial paths of the k-means groups in the Galactic disc, colored by median age. Top Right: Column density normalised map of these paths in the 𝑅𝑔𝑎𝑙–|𝑧 | plane to emphasise the path structure. The mean age-colored paths reveal coherent structure, including a dip-shaped feature around solar radii (𝑅gal ≳ 8 − 9 kpc) in old stars, seen as a suppression of vertical extension at right, and ver… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The ≈ 199, 290 disc stars in the [Fe/H]–[Mg/Fe] plane, illustrating the division between the low-𝛼 (137,624 stars) and high-𝛼 (61,666 stars) populations. The NMF basis in this subsection is learned using only the low- 𝛼 stars (below the dividing line). These learned patterns are then applied to the high-𝛼 stars to infer their latent fractions and to test how well the low-𝛼 chemical basis can reproduce the … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Distribution of latent clusters separated into high-𝛼 (top row) and low-𝛼 (bottom row) populations, projected into orbital action space and chemical planes. From left to right, panels show 𝐽𝑧 versus 𝐽𝑟 , 𝐽𝑧 versus 𝐿𝑧 , 𝐽𝑧 versus [Fe/H], and 𝐽𝑧 versus [Mg/Fe]. Points are coloured by the fractional contribution of the early SN II–dominated enrichment channel, 𝑓ch1. The high- and low-𝛼 discs show overlap in o… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Residual structure in the Galactic 𝑥–𝑦 plane after subtraction of smooth radial trends. The left panel shows 𝛿[Fe/H], defined as the residual after subtracting a mean radial [Fe/H] gradient. The four right panels show residuals in the NMF channel fractions,Δ 𝑓𝑚 = 𝑓𝑚− 𝑓𝑚 (𝑅), after subtraction of the shared radial mode model shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Elemental abundances generated by the latent variable model for the Galactic Genesis disc sample, using 𝑀 = 4 latent components. The measured ASTRA ASPCAP abundances are on the x-axis and the y-axis reports the generated abundance using the NMF basis. The bias, scatter and intrinsic scatter (subtracting the mean error in quadrature) are indicated in each sub-figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The element abundances of Milky Way disc stars encode entangled imprints of multiple enrichment processes, making it difficult to uncover the underlying chemical evolution. Here we re-project 16 stellar abundances for 199,290 red giant stars ([Fe/H]$ > -1$) into a set of (4) shared enrichment patterns, providing a generative framework for learning the organising structure of the Milky Way disc. The relative contributions of these patterns vary systematically across the disc, revealing a low-dimensional enrichment basis that responds coherently to global drivers of disc evolution. By grouping stars according to their pattern contributions, we identify coherent enrichment pathways that exhibit strong chemo-spatial correlations and are stratified in both age and height above the plane, linking radial growth to vertical disc structure. Stars occupying similar positions along these enrichment pathways also show coherent vertical deviations across radius, indicating that the low-dimensional chemical structure captures the disc's response to dynamical perturbations. We identify a transition in enrichment behaviour at approximately 6 Gyr, marking the onset of a more chemically mixed regime with increasing contributions from delayed sources. Within this connected system, the observed $\alpha$-bimodality arises within a shared, low-dimensional abundance structure, with stars populating continuous sequences of changing enrichment fractions that are tightly coupled to spatial, temporal, and orbital coordinates across the Milky Way disc.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that re-projecting 16 abundances measured for 199290 red-giant stars ([Fe/H] > −1) onto four shared linear enrichment patterns yields a low-dimensional generative basis for Milky Way disc evolution. Grouping stars by their pattern contributions reveals continuous enrichment pathways that correlate tightly with radius, height, age, and orbital parameters; the observed α-bimodality is presented as an emergent feature of these trajectories rather than distinct populations, with a transition to a more mixed regime identified near 6 Gyr.

Significance. If the four-pattern projection faithfully retains the variance associated with distinct nucleosynthetic channels, the work supplies a compact, data-driven framework that links chemistry to the disc’s radial growth and vertical structure. The large sample and the reported chemo-spatial correlations with independent age and |z| information constitute a concrete strength that could be used to test chemo-dynamical models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / pattern-extraction description] Abstract and methods description: the central claim that α-bimodality arises from continuous sequences within a shared 4D linear basis requires that the projection onto four patterns preserves variance from distinct channels (core-collapse vs. Type Ia, AGB). No quantitative assessment of explained variance, residual structure in the 16D–4D difference, or robustness to the [Fe/H] > −1 cut and red-giant selection is provided; this is load-bearing for the continuity interpretation.
  2. [Results on pathways and 6 Gyr transition] Results on enrichment pathways: the reported 6 Gyr transition and the stratification by age and height are derived from the same pattern coefficients used to define the pathways. Without an external benchmark (e.g., comparison to independent age indicators or a held-out abundance subset) the risk remains that the low-dimensional basis absorbs selection systematics and thereby artificially tightens the chemo-spatial correlations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Clarify the precise algorithm (PCA, NMF, or other) and the criterion used to fix the number of patterns at four; this should appear in the first methods subsection rather than being presupposed in the abstract.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state whether the plotted pattern contributions are normalized fractions or absolute weights, and whether uncertainties from the original abundance measurements are propagated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the key claims in our manuscript. We respond to each major comment below, indicating revisions where we agree additional support is warranted.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / pattern-extraction description] Abstract and methods description: the central claim that α-bimodality arises from continuous sequences within a shared 4D linear basis requires that the projection onto four patterns preserves variance from distinct channels (core-collapse vs. Type Ia, AGB). No quantitative assessment of explained variance, residual structure in the 16D–4D difference, or robustness to the [Fe/H] > −1 cut and red-giant selection is provided; this is load-bearing for the continuity interpretation.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative support for the fidelity of the 4D projection is necessary to underpin the interpretation that distinct nucleosynthetic channels are retained. The manuscript presents the patterns as a data-driven generative basis but does not report the per-pattern or cumulative explained variance, nor a systematic residual analysis. In the revised manuscript we will add this assessment, including the fraction of total variance captured by the four patterns and maps of the 16D–4D residuals to show that remaining structure is consistent with observational uncertainties rather than unmodeled channels. We will also report results from repeating the projection after relaxing the [Fe/H] > −1 threshold on a high-S/N subset; these checks will be placed in a new subsection of the Methods. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on pathways and 6 Gyr transition] Results on enrichment pathways: the reported 6 Gyr transition and the stratification by age and height are derived from the same pattern coefficients used to define the pathways. Without an external benchmark (e.g., comparison to independent age indicators or a held-out abundance subset) the risk remains that the low-dimensional basis absorbs selection systematics and thereby artificially tightens the chemo-spatial correlations.

    Authors: The pattern coefficients are constructed exclusively from the 16 abundance dimensions; stellar ages are derived from an independent pipeline (isochrone or asteroseismic) and |z| is a purely geometric coordinate, so the reported correlations test the chemical basis against quantities obtained separately from the projection itself. Nevertheless, we accept that selection effects inherent to the red-giant sample could influence the apparent strength of the chemo-spatial relations and the sharpness of the ~6 Gyr transition. In revision we will insert a new discussion paragraph that (i) explicitly compares the transition epoch recovered from a held-out abundance subset and (ii) quantifies how the observed age–height stratification changes when the sample is restricted to stars with the highest-quality age estimates. This addition will appear in the Results section. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Data-derived enrichment patterns validated via independent spatial, age and orbital correlations

full rationale

The derivation extracts four shared enrichment patterns from the 16 abundances of 199290 stars and then demonstrates that pattern contributions vary coherently with independently measured galactic coordinates, stellar ages and orbital parameters. These external variables supply grounding for the claimed chemo-spatial sequences and the 6 Gyr transition. No equation or grouping step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, and no load-bearing premise rests on a self-citation chain. The low-dimensional basis is therefore an exploratory re-projection whose interpretive value is tested against observables outside the abundance matrix itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the premise that a small number of linear patterns suffice to capture the dominant enrichment processes and that the resulting fractions correlate meaningfully with independent observables.

free parameters (1)
  • Number of enrichment patterns
    Fixed at four; choice directly determines the low-dimensional basis and the reported pathways.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Stellar abundances encode entangled imprints of multiple enrichment processes that can be disentangled into a small number of shared patterns
    Opening sentence of the abstract; underpins the entire re-projection step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5843 in / 1311 out tokens · 39428 ms · 2026-05-22T08:28:29.928410+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

123 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Z., Sousa S

    Adibekyan V. Z., Sousa S. G., Santos N. C., Delgado Mena E., Gonz \'a lez Hern \'a ndez J. I., Israelian G., Mayor M., Khachatryan G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219401 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...545A..32A 545, A32

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219401 2012

  2. [2]

    Z., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321520 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    Adibekyan V. Z., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321520 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321520 2013

  3. [3]

    Agertz O., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab322 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.5826A 503, 5826

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab322 2021

  4. [4]

    Anders F., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346666 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...678A.158A 678, A158

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346666 2023

  5. [5]

    Antoja T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0510-7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.561..360A 561, 360

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0510-7 2018

  6. [6]

    Aumer M., Binney J., Sch \"o nrich R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw777 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459.3326A 459, 3326

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw777 2016

  7. [7]

    Bailer-Jones C. A. L., Rybizki J., Fouesneau M., Demleitner M., Andrae R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AJ....161..147B 161, 147

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd806 2021

  8. [8]

    K., Bedell M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae07f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...867...31B 867, 31

    Beane A., Ness M. K., Bedell M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae07f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...867...31B 867, 31

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae07f 2018

  9. [9]

    W., 2022, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-022-01740-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NatAs...6..911B 6, 911

    Belokurov V., Evans N. W., 2022, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-022-01740-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022NatAs...6..911B 6, 911

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01740-w 2022

  10. [10]

    L., Fattahi A., Smith M

    Belokurov V., Sanders J. L., Fattahi A., Smith M. C., Deason A. J., Evans N. W., Grand R. J. J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.3880B 494, 3880

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa876 2020

  11. [11]

    Bensby T., Feltzing S., Lundstr \"o m I., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...410..527B 410, 527

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031213 2003

  12. [12]

    S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...562A..71B 562, A71

    Bensby T., Feltzing S., Oey M. S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...562A..71B 562, A71

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 2014

  13. [13]

    C., Loebman S

    Bird J. C., Loebman S. R., Weinberg D. H., Brooks A. M., Quinn T. R., Christensen C. R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab289 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.1815B 503, 1815

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab289 2021

  14. [14]

    R., Freeman K., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/713/1/166 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...713..166B 713, 166

    Bland-Hawthorn J., Krumholz M. R., Freeman K., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/713/1/166 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...713..166B 713, 166

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/713/1/166 2010

  15. [15]

    arXiv:2502.01895

    Bland-Hawthorn J., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2502.01895 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250201895B p. arXiv:2502.01895

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.01895 2025

  16. [16]

    Bonaca A., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9caa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...897L..18B 897, L18

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab9caa 2020

  17. [17]

    arXiv:2504.00135

    Borbolato L., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2504.00135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250400135B p. arXiv:2504.00135

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.00135 2025

  18. [18]

    Bovy J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..216...29B 216, 29

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 2015

  19. [19]

    W., Beers T

    Bovy J., Rix H.-W., Liu C., Hogg D. W., Beers T. C., Lee Y. S., 2012a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/753/2/148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...753..148B 753, 148

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/2/148

  20. [20]

    W., Beers T

    Bovy J., Rix H.-W., Hogg D. W., Beers T. C., Lee Y. S., Zhang L., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/115 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...755..115B 755, 115

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/755/2/115

  21. [21]

    F., Nidever D

    Bovy J., Rix H.-W., Schlafly E. F., Nidever D. L., Holtzman J. A., Shetrone M., Beers T. C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/30 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823...30B 823, 30

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/1/30 2016

  22. [22]

    S., Vaughan Jr

    Bowen I. S., Vaughan Jr. A. H., 1973, @doi [ ] 10.1364/AO.12.001430 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973ApOpt..12.1430B 12, 1430

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.12.001430 1973

  23. [23]

    S., Lipunova, G

    Brook C. B., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21738.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.426..690B 426, 690

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21738.x 2012

  24. [24]

    Buck T., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3289 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.5435B 491, 5435

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3289 2020

  25. [25]

    Cantat-Gaudin T., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348018 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...683A.128C 683, A128

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348018 2024

  26. [26]

    Casali G., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346274 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A..60C 677, A60

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346274 2023

  27. [27]

    Cerqui V., Haywood M., Snaith O., Di Matteo P., Casamiquela L., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452448 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...699A.277C 699, A277

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452448 2025

  28. [28]

    arXiv:2310.13050

    Chandra V., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2310.13050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231013050C p. arXiv:2310.13050

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.13050 2023

  29. [29]

    R., Sharma S., Bland-Hawthorn J., Kobayashi C., Karakas A

    Chen B., Hayden M. R., Sharma S., Bland-Hawthorn J., Kobayashi C., Karakas A. I., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1568 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.3791C 523, 3791

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1568 2023

  30. [30]

    Chiappini C., Matteucci F., Gratton R., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/303726 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...477..765C 477, 765

    work page doi:10.1086/303726 1997

  31. [31]

    W., Rix H.-W., Ness M

    Eilers A.-C., Hogg D. W., Rix H.-W., Ness M. K., Price-Whelan A. M., M \'e sz \'a ros S., Nitschelm C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac54ad , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...928...23E 928, 23

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac54ad 2022

  32. [32]

    arXiv:2503.19536

    Fernandez-Alvar E., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.19536 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250319536F p. arXiv:2503.19536

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.19536 2025

  33. [33]

    Measuring Radial Orbit Migration in the Milky Way Disk

    Frankel N., Rix H.-W., Ting Y.-S., Ness M. K., Hogg D. W., 2018, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv180509198F ( @eprint arXiv 1805.09198 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Frankel N., Sanders J., Rix H.-W., Ting Y.-S., Ness M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4254 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...884...99F 884, 99

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4254 2019

  35. [35]

    Frankel N., Sanders J., Ting Y.-S., Rix H.-W., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab910c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...896...15F 896, 15

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab910c 2020

  36. [36]

    Fuhrmann K., 1998, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...338..161F 338, 161

    work page 1998

  37. [37]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 2023

  38. [38]

    S., Ness M

    Gandhi S. S., Ness M. K., 2019, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190304030G

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    Gilmore G., Reid N., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/202.4.1025 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983MNRAS.202.1025G 202, 1025

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/202.4.1025 1983

  40. [40]

    Grand R. J. J., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2057 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.1603G 497, 1603

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2057 2020

  41. [41]

    J., Hogg D

    Griffith E. J., Hogg D. W., Dalcanton J. J., Hasselquist S., Ratcliffe B., Ness M., Weinberg D. H., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ad19c7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024AJ....167...98G 167, 98

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad19c7 2024

  42. [42]

    E., Siegmund, W

    Gunn J. E., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500975 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.2332G 131, 2332

    work page doi:10.1086/500975 2006

  43. [43]

    Hackshaw Z., Hawkins K., Filion C., Horta D., Laporte C. F. P., Carr C., Price-Whelan A. M., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad900e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...977..143H 977, 143

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad900e 2024

  44. [44]

    Hawkins K., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1244 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.3318H 525, 3318

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1244 2023

  45. [45]

    R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/132 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808..132H 808, 132

    Hayden M. R., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/132 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808..132H 808, 132

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/2/132 2015

  46. [46]

    Haywood M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10802.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.371.1760H 371, 1760

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10802.x 2006

  47. [47]

    Haywood M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13395.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.388.1175H 388, 1175

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13395.x 2008

  48. [48]

    D., Katz D., G \'o mez A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...560A.109H 560, A109

    Haywood M., Di Matteo P., Lehnert M. D., Katz D., G \'o mez A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...560A.109H 560, A109

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321397 2013

  49. [49]

    D., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...579A...5H 579, A5

    Haywood M., Di Matteo P., Snaith O., Lehnert M. D., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...579A...5H 579, A5

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425459 2015

  50. [50]

    D., Di Matteo P., Snaith O., Schultheis M., Katz D., G \'o mez A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527567 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...589A..66H 589, A66

    Haywood M., Lehnert M. D., Di Matteo P., Snaith O., Schultheis M., Katz D., G \'o mez A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527567 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...589A..66H 589, A66

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527567 2016

  51. [51]

    Haywood M., Di Matteo P., Lehnert M., Snaith O., Fragkoudi F., Khoperskov S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731363 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...618A..78H 618, A78

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731363 2018

  52. [53]

    M., Hogg D

    Horta D., Price-Whelan A. M., Hogg D. W., Johnston K. V., Widrow L., Dalcanton J. J., Ness M. K., Hunt J. A. S., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad16e8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962..165H 962, 165

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad16e8

  53. [54]

    Hunt J. A. S., Vasiliev E., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2024.101721 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025NewAR.10001721H 100, 101721

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newar.2024.101721 2025

  54. [55]

    Imig J., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ace9b8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954..124I 954, 124

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace9b8 2023

  55. [56]

    W., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2410.13256 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241013256J p

    Johnson J. W., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2410.13256 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241013256J p. arXiv:2410.13256

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.13256 2024

  56. [57]

    I., Lattanzio J

    Karakas A. I., Lattanzio J. C., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2014.21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PASA...31...30K 31, e030

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 2014

  57. [58]

    Katz D., G \'o mez A., Haywood M., Snaith O., Di Matteo P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140453 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...655A.111K 655, A111

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140453 2021

  58. [59]

    Khoperskov S., Haywood M., Snaith O., Di Matteo P., Lehnert M., Vasiliev E., Naroenkov S., Berczik P., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3996 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.5176K 501, 5176

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3996 2021

  59. [60]

    I., Lugaro M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abae65 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...900..179K 900, 179

    Kobayashi C., Karakas A. I., Lugaro M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abae65 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...900..179K 900, 179

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abae65 2020

  60. [61]

    A., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2507.06989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250706989K p

    Kollmeier J. A., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2507.06989 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250706989K p. arXiv:2507.06989

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.06989 2025

  61. [62]

    Kuhn V., Guo Y., Martin A., Bayless J., Gates E., Puleo A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad43eb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...968L..15K 968, L15

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad43eb 2024

  62. [63]

    Laporte C. F. P., Johnston K. V., G \'o mez F. A., Garavito-Camargo N., Besla G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1574 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481..286L 481, 286

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1574 2018

  63. [64]

    Lian J., et al., 2020a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa867 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.2561L 494, 2561

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa867

  64. [65]

    Lian J., et al., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2078 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.2371L 497, 2371

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2078

  65. [66]

    Lian J., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.4130L 513, 4130

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1151 2022

  66. [67]

    L., Ness M

    Lu Y. L., Ness M. K., Buck T., Zinn J. C., Johnston K. V., 2022a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac610 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.2890L 512, 2890

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac610

  67. [68]

    L., Ness M

    Lu Y. L., Ness M. K., Buck T., Carr C., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac780 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.4697L 512, 4697

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac780

  68. [69]

    L., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2364 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535..392L 535, 392

    Lu Y. L., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2364 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535..392L 535, 392

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2364 2024

  69. [70]

    T., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1774 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.3057M 471, 3057

    Mackereth J. T., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1774 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.3057M 471, 3057

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1774 2017

  70. [71]

    arXiv:2504.18532

    Mead J., De La Garza R., Ness M., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2504.18532 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250418532M p. arXiv:2504.18532

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.18532 2025

  71. [72]

    Miglio A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038307 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...645A..85M 645, A85

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038307 2021

  72. [73]

    Minchev I., Famaey B., Combes F., Di Matteo P., Mouhcine M., Wozniak H., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015139 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015139 2011

  73. [74]

    Minchev I., Chiappini C., Martig M., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...558A...9M 558, A9

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220189 2013

  74. [75]

    S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834...27M 834, 27

    Minchev I., Steinmetz M., Chiappini C., Martig M., Anders F., Matijevic G., de Jong R. S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...834...27M 834, 27

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/27 2017

  75. [76]

    Minchev I., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2033 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.1645M 481, 1645

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2033 2018

  76. [77]

    W., Rix H.-W., Martig M., Pinsonneault M

    Ness M., Hogg D. W., Rix H.-W., Martig M., Pinsonneault M. H., Ho A. Y. Q., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/114 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..114N 823, 114

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/114 2016

  77. [78]

    K., Johnston K

    Ness M. K., Johnston K. V., Blancato K., Rix H. W., Beane A., Bird J. C., Hawkins K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e3c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883..177N 883, 177

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab3e3c 2019

  78. [79]

    K., Wheeler A

    Ness M. K., Wheeler A. J., McKinnon K., Horta D., Casey A. R., Cunningham E. C., Price-Whelan A. M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4754 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...926..144N 926, 144

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4754 2022

  79. [80]

    K., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stag637 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.tmp..626N

    Ness M. K., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stag637 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.tmp..626N

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag637 2026

  80. [81]

    L., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/38 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...796...38N 796, 38

    Nidever D. L., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/38 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...796...38N 796, 38

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/796/1/38 2014

Showing first 80 references.