pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21836 · v1 · pith:YNKGZMUWnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 💻 cs.RO

Analytical and Experimental Force Analysis of a Soft Linear Pneumatic Actuator

Mohammed Abboodi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 06:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords soft sleeve actuatorspneumatic actuatorsforce analysisquasi-static modelaxial stiffnessexperimental validationwearable robotics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Net axial force of a linear soft sleeve actuator equals pressure force from cap and folded walls minus axial stiffness force.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes a quasi-static analytical model for the net axial force produced by a linear soft sleeve actuator. The model treats the force as the contribution from internal pressure acting on the end cap and the folded walls, then subtracts the resisting force from the actuator's axial stiffness. Experiments show that at 125 kPa the force falls from roughly 112 N with no extension to nearly zero at 40 mm of stretch. External static loads further reduce the force and delay its onset, especially at lower pressures. If correct, this explains the coupled roles of pressure, geometry, displacement, and stiffness in these compliant actuators for wearable systems.

Core claim

The central claim is that a quasi-static analytical model expresses the net axial force as the pressure-generated contribution from the cap and folded walls, reduced by the force associated with axial stiffness. The model incorporates internal pressure, projected pressure areas, folded wall geometry, axial displacement, and an experimentally fitted axial stiffness relation. Prescribed-extension experiments at 125 kPa show the generated force decreasing from approximately 112 N at zero extension to nearly zero at 40 mm. Static-load experiments show that external loading delays measurable force generation and reduces force output, particularly at low and intermediate pressures. The results as

What carries the argument

Quasi-static analytical model expressing net axial force as pressure-generated contribution from the cap and folded walls reduced by axial stiffness force.

Load-bearing premise

The axial stiffness is represented by an experimentally fitted relation that is assumed to hold across the tested range of extensions, pressures, and loading conditions.

What would settle it

Repeating the prescribed-extension experiment at 125 kPa and finding that force remains substantially above zero at 40 mm extension would falsify the model's prediction of force reduction to nearly zero.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21836 by Mohammed Abboodi.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Geometric representation of the LSSA and the forces acting on it, (b) Detailed wall geometrical parameters 𝐹𝑦 = ∑ (𝐹1 + 𝐹2𝑦 − 𝐹3𝑦) −𝐹𝐾 (2) 𝐹1 = 𝑃 × 𝐴1 𝐹2𝑦 = 𝑃 × 𝐴2 𝐹3𝑦 = 𝑃 × 𝐴3 (3) (4) (5) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Axial stiffness polynomial model 𝐹𝐾𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 𝑎 𝑦 3 + 𝑏 𝑦 2 + 𝑐 𝑦 +𝑑 (9) 𝐹𝐾𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 4.1481 × 10−4 𝑦 3 + 1.2865 × 10−2 𝑦 2 + 2.0789 𝑦 −0.2246 (10) 𝐹𝑦 = 𝐹1 + 𝐹2𝑦 −𝐹3𝑦 − 4.1481 × 10−4 𝑦 3 − 1.2865 × 10−2 𝑦 2 − 2.0789 𝑦 + 0.2246 (13) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Soft sleeve actuators (SSAs) have recently been developed as a pneumatic actuation approach for wearable and assistive robotic systems. By integrating the actuation structure into a sleeve-like geometry, these actuators can reduce reliance on external attachment layers and transmission mechanisms while maintaining compliance with limb-shaped surfaces. However, the force-generation behavior of SSAs remains insufficiently explained, particularly with respect to the variation of output force during extension, the influence of external loading, and the mechanical role of axial stiffness. This paper presents an analytical and experimental force analysis of a linear soft sleeve actuator (LSSA). A quasi-static analytical model was developed by expressing the net axial force as the pressure-generated contribution from the cap and folded walls, reduced by the force associated with axial stiffness. The model incorporates internal pressure, projected pressure areas, folded wall geometry, axial displacement, and an experimentally fitted axial stiffness relation. Prescribed-extension and static-load experiments were conducted to evaluate the actuator response. At 125 kPa, the generated force decreased from approximately 112 N at zero extension to nearly zero at 40 mm. Static loading delayed measurable force generation and reduced force output, particularly at low and intermediate pressures. The results show that LSSA force generation is governed by coupled effects of pressure, geometry, displacement, loading, and axial stiffness.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a quasi-static analytical model for the net axial force of a linear soft sleeve actuator (LSSA), expressing it as the pressure-generated contributions from the cap and folded walls reduced by the force associated with axial stiffness. The model incorporates internal pressure, projected areas, folded wall geometry, axial displacement, and an experimentally fitted axial stiffness relation. It is evaluated via prescribed-extension and static-load experiments, which show that at 125 kPa the generated force decreases from approximately 112 N at zero extension to nearly zero at 40 mm, with static loading delaying and reducing force output.

Significance. If the central claim holds with independent validation of the stiffness term, the work would provide a useful framework for analyzing force generation in soft sleeve actuators, clarifying the coupled roles of pressure, geometry, displacement, and stiffness for wearable robotic applications. The reported experimental trends on force variation with extension and external loading offer practical insights, though the current fitting approach limits broader predictive utility.

major comments (1)
  1. [Analytical Model Development] The analytical model defines net axial force as (cap + folded-wall pressure terms) minus axial-stiffness force, but the axial stiffness relation is experimentally fitted from the same prescribed-extension and static-load trials used for overall model validation (see reader's weakest assumption and skeptic note). This makes the subtraction step dependent on data-tuned parameters rather than an independent derivation or pressure-independent measurement, raising a load-bearing concern for the claim that the model analytically explains force behavior.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Experimental Results] The results section and abstract report specific force values (e.g., 112 N at zero extension) but omit error bars, standard deviations, number of trials, or raw data, which weakens assessment of the reliability of trends such as force decrease with extension and effects of static loading.
  2. [Model Formulation] The model description would be clearer if the exact functional form and coefficients of the experimentally fitted axial stiffness relation were stated explicitly or referenced by equation number.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment on the analytical model development below, providing clarification on the stiffness term while committing to revisions that strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The analytical model defines net axial force as (cap + folded-wall pressure terms) minus axial-stiffness force, but the axial stiffness relation is experimentally fitted from the same prescribed-extension and static-load trials used for overall model validation. This makes the subtraction step dependent on data-tuned parameters rather than an independent derivation or pressure-independent measurement, raising a load-bearing concern for the claim that the model analytically explains force behavior.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this observation: the axial stiffness relation was indeed obtained by fitting to data from the prescribed-extension experiments that also contribute to model validation. The pressure-driven terms (cap and folded-wall contributions) remain fully analytical, derived from internal pressure, projected areas, and folded-wall geometry as functions of axial displacement. The stiffness term represents a necessary material property to account for the actuator's resistance to extension. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly describe the fitting procedure, highlight the separation between analytical pressure components and the empirical stiffness correction, and add discussion of how this hybrid approach still enables analytical insight into force variation with extension and loading. If space permits, we will also include the raw stiffness data and fitting equation in the main text or supplementary material. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Axial stiffness fitted from same experiments used for model validation

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract (model description) and Section on Analytical Model]
    "A quasi-static analytical model was developed by expressing the net axial force as the pressure-generated contribution from the cap and folded walls, reduced by the force associated with axial stiffness. The model incorporates internal pressure, projected pressure areas, folded wall geometry, axial displacement, and an experimentally fitted axial stiffness relation."

    The stiffness term is fitted from the identical prescribed-extension and static-load experiments that later serve as the validation dataset for the net-force predictions. No separate, pressure-independent stiffness measurement or derivation is supplied, so the 'analytical' net-force expression is forced to reproduce the observed forces by construction of the fit.

full rationale

The paper's quasi-static model expresses net axial force as pressure terms minus an axial-stiffness force term. The stiffness relation is obtained by fitting to data from the prescribed-extension and static-load trials. These same trials supply the force measurements against which the overall model is evaluated. Consequently the subtraction step is calibrated directly to the validation data rather than derived from independent measurements or first-principles stiffness analysis. The pressure and geometry contributions remain analytical, but the load-bearing correction is not, producing partial circularity in the claimed analytical prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a fitted axial stiffness parameter and the quasi-static approximation; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • axial stiffness relation
    Experimentally fitted to data as stated in the abstract; used to reduce the pressure-generated force.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Quasi-static conditions hold, allowing neglect of dynamic effects such as inertia and flow transients.
    Invoked to develop the analytical model from pressure areas and geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5754 in / 1365 out tokens · 57915 ms · 2026-05-22T06:20:54.395351+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Soft Pneumatic Actuators for Soft Robotics: A Motion-Based Review of Actuation Mechanisms and Performance Trade-offs,

    M. Abboodi, “Soft Pneumatic Actuators for Soft Robotics: A Motion-Based Review of Actuation Mechanisms and Performance Trade-offs,” May 2026, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.6647558

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.6647558 2026

  2. [3]

    A review of soft wearable robots that provide active assistance: Trends, common actuation methods, fabrication, and applications,

    C. Thalman and P. Artemiadis, “A review of soft wearable robots that provide active assistance: Trends, common actuation methods, fabrication, and applications,” Wearable Technologies, vol. 1, p. e3, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1017/wtc.2020.4

    work page doi:10.1017/wtc.2020.4 2020

  3. [4]

    Twisting Soft Sleeve Actuator: Design and Experimental Evaluation,

    M. Abboodi and M. Doumit, “Twisting Soft Sleeve Actuator: Design and Experimental Evaluation,” Electronics (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 20, p. 4020, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.3390/electronics14204020

    work page doi:10.3390/electronics14204020 2025

  4. [5]

    Design, Manufacturing, and Testing of a Novel Omnidirectional Soft Sleeve Actuator,

    M. Abboodi and M. Doumit, “Design, Manufacturing, and Testing of a Novel Omnidirectional Soft Sleeve Actuator,” Sci. Rep., 2026

    work page 2026

  5. [6]

    Use the Force: Review of High-Rate Actuation of Shape Memory Alloys,

    A. Dana, S. Vollach, and D. Shilo, “Use the Force: Review of High-Rate Actuation of Shape Memory Alloys,” Actuators, vol. 10, no. 7, p. 140, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3390/act10070140

    work page doi:10.3390/act10070140 2021

  6. [7]

    Active cooling of twisted coiled actuators via fabric air channels,

    A. Lizotte and A. L. Trejos, “Active cooling of twisted coiled actuators via fabric air channels,” Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences, vol. 3, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1016355

    work page doi:10.3389/fresc.2022.1016355 2022

  7. [8]

    Development and Testing of Novel Soft Sleeve Actuators,

    M. Abboodi and M. Doumit, “Development and Testing of Novel Soft Sleeve Actuators,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 39995–40010, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3376407

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3376407 2024

  8. [9]

    Biocompatible micro, soft bellow actuator rapidly manufactured using 3D-printed soluble mold,

    W. Jung, Y. Kang, S. Han, and Y. Hwang, “Biocompatible micro, soft bellow actuator rapidly manufactured using 3D-printed soluble mold,” Journal of Micromechanics 10 and Microengineering, vol. 29, no. 12, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1361-6439/ab477f

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6439/ab477f 2019

  9. [10]

    3D Printable Linear Soft Vacuum Actuators: Their Modeling, Performance Quantification and Application in Soft Robotic Systems,

    C. Tawk, G. M. Spinks, M. In Het Panhuis, and G. Alici, “3D Printable Linear Soft Vacuum Actuators: Their Modeling, Performance Quantification and Application in Soft Robotic Systems,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 2118–2129, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2019.2933027

    work page doi:10.1109/tmech.2019.2933027 2019

  10. [11]

    A Soft Robotic Hand Based on Bellows Actuators for Dishwashing Automation,

    Z. Wang et al., “A Soft Robotic Hand Based on Bellows Actuators for Dishwashing Automation,” IEEE Robot Autom Lett, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2139–2146, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1109/LRA.2021.3061063

    work page doi:10.1109/lra.2021.3061063 2021

  11. [12]

    Preliminary Design and Performance Test of an Origami Actuator Inspired by Yoshimura Pattern,

    Y. Dang, J. Chen, and J. Han, “Preliminary Design and Performance Test of an Origami Actuator Inspired by Yoshimura Pattern,” in 2021 27th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP), 2021, pp. 435–439. doi: 10.1109/M2VIP49856.2021.9664993

    work page doi:10.1109/m2vip49856.2021.9664993 2021

  12. [13]

    Design and Analysis of a Soft Pneumatic Actuator with Origami Shell Reinforcement,

    L. Paez, G. Agarwal, and J. Paik, “Design and Analysis of a Soft Pneumatic Actuator with Origami Shell Reinforcement,” Soft Robot, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 109–119, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1089/soro.2016.0023

    work page doi:10.1089/soro.2016.0023 2016

  13. [14]

    Design of deployable circular structures based on Miura origami pattern,

    S. Wang, J. Wu, P. Yan, H. Huang, B. Li, and R. Liu, “Design of deployable circular structures based on Miura origami pattern,” Mech Mach Theory, vol. 186, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2023.105350

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2023.105350 2023

  14. [15]

    Figueroa

    A. Pagoli, F. Chapelle, J. A. Corrales-Ramon, Y. Mezouar, and Y. Lapusta, “Review of soft fluidic actuators: Classification and materials modeling analysis,” Jan. 01, 2022, IOP Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1088/1361- 665X/ac383a

    work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2022

  15. [16]

    Soft robotics: A review of recent developments of pneumatic soft actuators,

    J. Walker et al., “Soft robotics: A review of recent developments of pneumatic soft actuators,” Actuators, vol. 9, no. 1, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.3390/act9010003

    work page doi:10.3390/act9010003 2020

  16. [17]

    Towards a soft pneumatic glove for hand rehabilitation,

    P. Polygerinos et al., “Towards a soft pneumatic glove for hand rehabilitation,” in IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2013, pp. 1512–1517. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2013.6696549

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696549 2013

  17. [18]

    Soft Pneumatic Actuators: A Review of Design, Fabrication, Modeling, Sensing, Control and Applications,

    M. S. Xavier et al., “Soft Pneumatic Actuators: A Review of Design, Fabrication, Modeling, Sensing, Control and Applications,” 2022, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3179589

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2022.3179589 2022

  18. [19]

    Soft Actuators for Soft Robotic Applications: A Review,

    N. El-Atab et al., “Soft Actuators for Soft Robotic Applications: A Review,” Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 2, no. 10, p. 2000128, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1002/aisy.202000128

    work page doi:10.1002/aisy.202000128 2020

  19. [20]

    Omnidirectional soft pneumatic actuators: a design and optimization framework,

    M. Moutousi and P. Polygerinos, “Omnidirectional soft pneumatic actuators: a design and optimization framework,” Front Robot AI, vol. 11, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1418484

    work page doi:10.3389/frobt.2024.1418484 2024