pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21992 · v1 · pith:ZYXS6PL6new · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🧮 math.RA · math.GR

Inner post-Lie algebras and inner post-groups

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 02:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.RA math.GR
keywords inner post-Lie algebraRota-Baxter operatorobstruction classcohomologyextension theoryinner post-group
0
0 comments X

The pith

An inner post-Lie algebra is induced by a Rota-Baxter operator precisely when its obstruction class is trivial.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines an obstruction class for an inner post-Lie algebra using extension theory and cohomology. It proves that the algebra arises from a Rota-Baxter operator exactly when this class vanishes. A parallel equivalence is shown for inner post-groups. The result supplies a cohomological test for the existence of the inducing operator and ends with applications of the structures.

Core claim

An inner post-Lie algebra is induced by a Rota-Baxter operator if and only if the obstruction class is trivial. A parallel statement holds for inner post-groups.

What carries the argument

The obstruction class, constructed via extension theory and cohomology, that vanishes exactly when an inner post-Lie algebra or inner post-group is induced by a Rota-Baxter operator.

If this is right

  • A Rota-Baxter operator inducing the algebra exists precisely when the obstruction class vanishes.
  • The identical criterion applies to inner post-groups.
  • Applications of inner post-Lie algebras and inner post-groups are obtained from this characterization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The criterion offers a way to decide whether a given inner post-Lie algebra comes from a Rota-Baxter operator without constructing the operator directly.
  • The same obstruction technique might apply to other operators or to deformations of these algebras.
  • Explicit computations of the class for low-dimensional examples could produce new families of post-Lie structures.

Load-bearing premise

The cohomological obstruction class is well-defined on these algebras and its vanishing is equivalent to the existence of an inducing Rota-Baxter operator.

What would settle it

Exhibit a concrete inner post-Lie algebra whose obstruction class is trivial yet no Rota-Baxter operator induces it, or whose class is nontrivial yet an inducing operator still exists.

read the original abstract

In this paper, using extension theory and cohomological approach we introduce the notion of the obstruction class for an inner post-Lie algebra being induced by a Rota-Baxter operator, and show that an inner post-Lie algebra is induced by a Rota-Baxter operator if and only if the obstruction class is trivial. Similarly, we introduce the notion of the obstruction class for an inner post-group being induced by a Rota-Baxter operator, and prove a parallel result. Finally, we give some applications of inner post-Lie algebras and inner post-groups.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces, via extension theory and cohomology, an obstruction class whose vanishing is equivalent to an inner post-Lie algebra being induced by a Rota-Baxter operator; a parallel equivalence is proved for inner post-groups, followed by applications.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies a cohomological criterion that classifies when inner post-Lie structures arise from Rota-Baxter operators, extending standard extension theory in a manner that remains valid over general vector spaces without finite-dimensionality or characteristic restrictions.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the main equivalences cleanly but does not indicate the precise cohomology theory or the base ring assumptions; a single sentence clarifying these would improve accessibility.
  2. Notation for the obstruction class and the relevant cohomology groups should be introduced with explicit cross-references to the definitions in the body so that the iff statements can be traced without ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures the main contributions regarding the obstruction classes in the cohomology of inner post-Lie algebras and inner post-groups, and their relation to Rota-Baxter operators. As no specific major comments were listed in the report, we have no individual points requiring detailed rebuttal at this time.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard obstruction theory applied directly

full rationale

The paper defines an obstruction class in the appropriate cohomology group via extension theory for inner post-Lie algebras (and analogously for post-groups), then proves the if-and-only-if equivalence: the class vanishes precisely when a Rota-Baxter operator inducing the structure exists. Both directions are established by explicit construction (trivial class yields the operator; an inducing operator yields the trivial class). No step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, imports a uniqueness theorem via self-citation, or renames a known result; the setup is self-contained over general vector spaces using standard cohomological methods without additional restrictions that would create circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the applicability of extension theory and a cohomological obstruction class whose definition is not expanded in the abstract; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Extension theory and cohomology apply to inner post-Lie algebras and yield a well-defined obstruction class whose vanishing detects induction by a Rota-Baxter operator.
    Invoked in the abstract as the method used to introduce the obstruction class.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5619 in / 1282 out tokens · 24364 ms · 2026-05-22T02:50:20.860341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bai, An introduction to pre-Lie algebras, inAlgebra and Applications1-Nonssociative Algebras and Cate- gories(2020), 245–273

    C. Bai, An introduction to pre-Lie algebras, inAlgebra and Applications1-Nonssociative Algebras and Cate- gories(2020), 245–273. 3

  2. [2]

    C. Bai, L. Guo and X. Ni, Nonabelian generalized Lax pairs, the classical Yang-Baxter equation and PostLie algebras,Comm. Math. Phys.297(2010), 553–596. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7

  3. [3]

    C. Bai, L. Guo, Y . Sheng and R. Tang, Post-groups, (Lie-)Butcher groups and the Yang-Baxter equation,Math. Ann.388(2024), 3127–3167. 2, 8, 9, 12, 13

  4. [4]

    Bardakov and V

    V . Bardakov and V . Gubarev, Rota-Baxter groups, skew left braces, and the Yang-Baxter equation,J. Algebra 596(2022), 328–351. 2, 9

  5. [5]

    Bardakov and V

    V . Bardakov and V . Gubarev, Rota-Baxter operators on groups,Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci.133(2023), 29 pp. 16

  6. [6]

    Bruned and F

    Y . Bruned and F. Katsetsiadis, Post-Lie algebras in regularity structures,Forum Math. Sigma11(2023), 1–20. 1

  7. [7]

    Burde, Left-symmetric algebras, or pre-Lie algebras in geometry and physics,Cent

    D. Burde, Left-symmetric algebras, or pre-Lie algebras in geometry and physics,Cent. Eur. J. Math.4(2006), 323–357. 3

  8. [8]

    Burde, K

    D. Burde, K. Dekimpe and K. Vercammen, Affine actions on Lie groups and post-Lie algebra structures,Linear Algebra Appl.(5)437(2012), 1250–1263. 1

  9. [9]

    Burde, K

    D. Burde, K. Dekimpe and M. Monadjem, Rigidity results for Lie algebras admitting a post-Lie algebra struc- ture,Internat. J. Algebra Comput.32(2022), 1495–1511. 2, 13

  10. [10]

    Burde and V

    D. Burde and V . Gubarev, Rota-Baxter operators and post-Lie algebra structures on semisimple Lie algebras, Comm. Algebra47(2019), 2280–2296. 2, 4, 8

  11. [11]

    Burde and V

    D. Burde and V . Gubarev, Decompositions of algebras and post-associative algebra structures,Internat. J. Algebra Comput.30(2020), 451–466. 14, 15 INNER POST-LIE ALGEBRAS AND INNER POST-GROUPS 17

  12. [12]

    Burde and W

    D. Burde and W. Moens, Commutative post-Lie algebra structures on Lie algebras,J. Algebra467(2016), 183–201. 2, 4

  13. [13]

    Caranti and L

    A. Caranti and L. Stefanello, Skew braces from Rota-Baxter operators: a cohomological characterisation and some examples,Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.202(2023), 1–13. 2

  14. [14]

    Galt and V

    A. Galt and V . Gubarev, Rota Baxter operators on dihedral and alternating groups, to appear inAdv. Group Theory Appl.16

  15. [15]

    Guarnieri and L

    L. Guarnieri and L. Vendramin, Skew braces and the Yang-Baxter equation,Math. Comp.86(2017), 2519–

  16. [16]

    Gubarev, Universal Enveloping Lie Rota-Baxter Algebras of Pre-Lie and Post-Lie Algebras,Algebra and Logic, (1)58(2019), 3–21

    V . Gubarev, Universal Enveloping Lie Rota-Baxter Algebras of Pre-Lie and Post-Lie Algebras,Algebra and Logic, (1)58(2019), 3–21. 1

  17. [17]

    Gubarev and P

    V . Gubarev and P. Kolesnikov, Embedding of dendriform algebras into Rota-Baxter algebras,Cent. Eur. J. Math.(2)11(2013), 226–245. 1

  18. [18]

    L. Guo, H. Lang and Y . Sheng, Integration and geometrization of Rota-Baxter Lie algebras,Adv. Math.387 (2021), 34 pp. 2, 9, 13, 15

  19. [19]

    D. Lu, C. Bai and L. Guo, A bialgebra theory of post-Lie algebras via Manin triples and generalized Hessian Lie groups, arXiv: 2502.04954. 7

  20. [20]

    Manchon, A short survey on pre-Lie algebras, inNoncommutative geometry and physics: renormalisation, motives, index theory(2011), 89–102

    D. Manchon, A short survey on pre-Lie algebras, inNoncommutative geometry and physics: renormalisation, motives, index theory(2011), 89–102. 3

  21. [21]

    Munthe-Kaas and A

    H. Munthe-Kaas and A. Lundervold, On post-Lie algebras, Lie-Butcher series and moving frames,Found. Comput. Math.13(2013), 583–613. 1

  22. [22]

    Onishchik, Inclusion relations between transitive compact transformation groups,Trudy Moskov

    A. Onishchik, Inclusion relations between transitive compact transformation groups,Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obˇ sˇ c.11(1962), 199–242. 3

  23. [23]

    Onishchik, Decompositions of reductive Lie groups,Mat

    A. Onishchik, Decompositions of reductive Lie groups,Mat. Sb. (N.S.)4 (12)80(122) (1969), 553–599. 3

  24. [24]

    Rathee and M

    N. Rathee and M. Singh, Relative Rota-Baxter groups and skew left braces,Forum Math.37(2025), 919–935. 2

  25. [25]

    M. A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, What is a classicalr-matrix?Funct. Anal. Appl.17(1983), 259–272. 1

  26. [26]

    Vallette, Homology of generalized partition posets,J

    B. Vallette, Homology of generalized partition posets,J. Pure Appl. Algebra208(2) (2007), 699–725. 1 SobolevInstitute ofMathematicsAcad. Koptyug a ve. 4, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia Email address:wsewolod89@gmail.com Department ofMathematics, JilinUniversity, Changchun130012, Jilin, China Email address:liyue25@mails.jlu.edu.cn Department ofMathematics, Jil...