Photoemission intermittency via stochastic gating in rubrene nanowires coupled to plasmonic silver nanoparticles

Frithjof Harmsen; Ingo Barke; Moha Naeimi; Sylvia Speller; Waqas Pervez

arxiv: 2605.22313 · v1 · pith:SNEPOD5Znew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Photoemission intermittency via stochastic gating in rubrene nanowires coupled to plasmonic silver nanoparticles

Moha Naeimi , Waqas Pervez , Frithjof Harmsen , Ingo Barke , Sylvia Speller This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 04:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords photoemission intermittencyrubrene nanowiressilver nanoparticlesPEEMexcitoncharge gatingorganic-plasmonic interface

0 comments

The pith

Photoemission intermittency arises from stochastic charge gating at rubrene-silver nanoparticle interfaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper observes that electron emission from rubrene nanowires on silver nanoparticles turns on and off in stochastic bursts. Energy-resolved measurements show that the emitted electrons have energies typical of the organic semiconductor but with yield boosted by the nanoparticles. The authors link this intermittency to the buildup of photo-holes that temporarily block or gate further charge emission due to separation of electrons and holes at the interface. If this mechanism holds, it points to a dynamic way charge moves across organic-plasmonic boundaries that changes over time rather than staying steady. This matters because it reveals a new kind of nanoscale behavior that could affect how we understand and use light-driven charge transfer in such hybrid systems.

Core claim

The observed photoemission intermittency results from photo-hole accumulation and stochastic gating of charge due to electron-hole separation at the nano interface. Energy-resolved measurements reveal that the emitted electrons carry hybrid information, with photoelectron yield enhancement from the nanoparticles and kinetic energies set by the organic semiconductor. The intermittency causes a dynamic shift in the electron spectra that correlates with the yield changes.

What carries the argument

Stochastic gating of charge due to photo-hole accumulation at the organic-plasmonic nano interface, which separates electrons and holes and leads to on-off bursts in emission.

If this is right

The hybrid electron yield combines nanoparticle enhancement with organic semiconductor kinetic energies.
Dynamic spectral shifts occur in tandem with changes in photoelectron yield.
The behavior indicates a new dynamic regime of charge assisted emission at organic-plasmonic interfaces.
Photoemission intermittency serves as a signature of this nanoscale charge separation process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If confirmed, this could guide the design of interfaces where controlled intermittency is used for timing or sensing in nanoscale devices.
Similar gating effects might appear in other organic-inorganic hybrid structures used for photovoltaics or photocatalysis.
Time-resolved studies could test how the accumulation rate depends on light intensity or temperature.

Load-bearing premise

The stochastic bursts and spectral shifts are caused by photo-hole accumulation and stochastic gating rather than experimental artifacts or other physical processes.

What would settle it

A measurement showing no correlation between intermittency and charge separation signatures, or the absence of intermittency when electron-hole separation is prevented by an applied field or different interface design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22313 by Frithjof Harmsen, Ingo Barke, Moha Naeimi, Sylvia Speller, Waqas Pervez.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Photoemission intermittency is pronounced with S [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a and b) Electron spectra of two sites, with and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a, b and c) Electron spectra of a NP, rubrene wire [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In this work, we report a new nanoscale phenomenon observed as photoemission intermittency (On-Off electron emission), manifested as stochastic bursts in electron yield at quasi-one-dimensional organic wires and silver nanoparticles interface. Energy-resolved measurements reveal that the emitted electrons carry out hybrid information, containing photoelectron yield enhancement associated with the nanoparticles and kinetic energies determined by the organic semiconductor. The intermittency results in a dynamic shift of the electron spectra correlating with the photoelectron yield. We attribute the observed behaviour to the photo-hole accumulation and stochastic gating of charge due to electron-hole separation at the nano interface. These findings introduces the photoemission intermittency as a nanoscale phenomenon indicating a new dynamic regime of charge assisted emission at organic-plasmonic interfaces. Keywords: rubrene, nanoparticle, PEEM, exciton, charge

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper observes stochastic photoemission bursts at rubrene nanowire-silver nanoparticle interfaces via PEEM and links them to interface charge separation, but the mechanism rests on interpretation without isolating controls.

read the letter

The main thing here is that the authors have recorded stochastic on-off bursts in photoemission yield from rubrene nanowires coupled to plasmonic silver nanoparticles, with the bursts correlating to shifts in the kinetic energy of the emitted electrons. They interpret this as a new dynamic regime driven by photo-hole accumulation and stochastic gating from electron-hole separation at the nano interface. The energy-resolved PEEM data does capture hybrid signatures—nanoparticle-driven yield boosts paired with organic-determined energies—which is a concrete experimental step beyond steady-state ensemble measurements. That correlation is the clearest part of the work and shows the system can fluctuate rather than sit in a fixed emission state. The attribution to charge accumulation and gating is plausible on its face but thin on support. No bias sweeps, plasmon-resonance tuning, or time-resolved charge probes are described that would separate this picture from bulk traps, local heating, or PEEM-specific artifacts. The abstract and summary give no error bars, statistics, or method details, so the claim stays at the level of reasonable interpretation rather than a tightly constrained result. This is niche work aimed at people studying organic-plasmonic hybrids, excitons, and PEEM-based charge dynamics. A reader already in that corner might pick up the observation for follow-up ideas, but it is unlikely to travel far outside it. The experimental finding is specific enough to merit referee time even if the mechanism needs tightening, so I would send it out for review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports observation of photoemission intermittency (stochastic On-Off bursts in electron yield) at the interface between rubrene nanowires and plasmonic silver nanoparticles using energy-resolved PEEM. The emitted electrons exhibit hybrid characteristics (yield enhancement from the nanoparticles combined with kinetic energies set by the organic semiconductor), with dynamic spectral shifts correlated to the yield bursts. The authors attribute the intermittency to photo-hole accumulation and stochastic gating arising from electron-hole separation at the nano interface, framing this as a new dynamic regime of charge-assisted emission.

Significance. If the mechanistic attribution can be substantiated, the work would identify a potentially novel nanoscale charge-dynamics regime at organic-plasmonic interfaces with possible relevance to exciton-charge interactions and emission processes. The reported correlation between yield bursts and kinetic-energy shifts is an interesting empirical observation; however, the manuscript currently provides no quantitative data, error bars, controls, or detailed methods, so the significance remains conditional on future validation.

major comments (2)

Abstract and main text: the central attribution of intermittency to photo-hole accumulation and stochastic gating via interface electron-hole separation is presented as an interpretation of the observed bursts and spectral shifts, yet no quantitative metrics (e.g., burst statistics, time constants, or intensity dependence), error analysis, or exclusion of alternatives (bulk traps, plasmonic heating, PEEM charging artifacts) are supplied; this is load-bearing because the mechanistic claim rests entirely on this untested interpretation.
Results/Methods sections (as implied by the abstract): no bias-dependent gating measurements, wavelength-tuned plasmon-resonance controls, or time-resolved charge-tracking experiments are described that would isolate the proposed stochastic-gating mechanism from competing charge-dynamics processes.

minor comments (2)

The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of sample preparation, excitation conditions, and PEEM operating parameters to allow readers to assess possible artifacts.
Clarify whether the keyword 'exciton' refers to a specific process in the proposed mechanism or is used descriptively; the current text emphasizes charge separation without explicit exciton dynamics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We have revised the text to incorporate quantitative analysis where possible from the existing data and to clarify the basis for our mechanistic interpretation. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract and main text: the central attribution of intermittency to photo-hole accumulation and stochastic gating via interface electron-hole separation is presented as an interpretation of the observed bursts and spectral shifts, yet no quantitative metrics (e.g., burst statistics, time constants, or intensity dependence), error analysis, or exclusion of alternatives (bulk traps, plasmonic heating, PEEM charging artifacts) are supplied; this is load-bearing because the mechanistic claim rests entirely on this untested interpretation.

Authors: We agree that quantitative support and explicit exclusion of alternatives would strengthen the attribution. From reanalysis of the recorded PEEM time series we have extracted burst statistics (on/off duration histograms and average dwell times), intensity dependence of the intermittency rate, and error bars on the correlated spectral shifts; these are now presented in a new figure and accompanying text. Exclusion of alternatives is addressed by noting that bulk traps would not produce the spatially localized interface effect or the hybrid yield-plus-kinetic-energy signature, plasmonic heating would not yield the observed reversible shifts locked to the organic semiconductor band edge, and PEEM charging artifacts are inconsistent with the absence of the phenomenon in control regions lacking nanoparticles. These points have been added to the revised discussion. revision: yes
Referee: Results/Methods sections (as implied by the abstract): no bias-dependent gating measurements, wavelength-tuned plasmon-resonance controls, or time-resolved charge-tracking experiments are described that would isolate the proposed stochastic-gating mechanism from competing charge-dynamics processes.

Authors: The energy-resolved PEEM acquisition already captures simultaneous time-dependent yield and spectral information, providing a direct record of the dynamic charge-related shifts. We have expanded the methods section with additional experimental parameters and have added a paragraph explaining that the excitation wavelength was chosen to overlap the known plasmon resonance of the silver nanoparticles. Bias-dependent measurements are not included because the PEEM geometry employed does not allow controlled sample biasing without loss of imaging capability; we have noted this limitation explicitly and indicated that such experiments would be valuable for future work. The current evidence for stochastic gating rests on the interface specificity and the correlation between yield bursts and kinetic-energy shifts. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational attribution without equations or self-referential reduction

full rationale

The manuscript reports measured photoemission bursts and kinetic-energy shifts at the rubrene-AgNP interface and attributes them to photo-hole accumulation plus stochastic gating. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivation steps appear in the provided text. The central claim is presented as an interpretive hypothesis of the data rather than a mathematical result derived from prior self-citations or by-construction definitions. Because the paper contains no load-bearing derivation chain that reduces to its own inputs, the analysis is self-contained and receives the lowest circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of photoemission microscopy being able to distinguish hybrid electron properties and on the interpretation that observed bursts arise from charge separation; no free parameters or new entities with independent evidence are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Photoemission electron microscopy can reliably separate nanoparticle-enhanced yield from organic-semiconductor kinetic energies.
Invoked when the abstract states that emitted electrons carry hybrid information.

invented entities (1)

stochastic gating due to photo-hole accumulation no independent evidence
purpose: Explains the on-off intermittency as resulting from electron-hole separation at the interface.
Proposed mechanism without a separate falsifiable prediction or independent measurement shown in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5686 in / 1304 out tokens · 54813 ms · 2026-05-22T04:53:49.816363+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

[1]

hot spots

resulting in strongly localized and enhanced electro- magnetic near fields at the wire-NP interface. This lo- cal field enhancement is expected to amplify exciton and carrier generation. A third determinant is the role of the quasi-1D rod geometry in combination with the wire-NP interfaces. Such rods confine roaming charge carriers and can act as active w...

work page
[2]

S. Haas, A. F. Stassen, G. Schuck, K. P. Pernstich, D. J. Gundlach, B. Batlogg, U. Berens, and H.-J. Kirner, High charge-carrier mobility and low trap density in a rubrene 5 derivative, Physical Review B76(2007)

work page 2007
[3]

Podzorov, M

V. Podzorov, M. E. Gershenson, C. Kloc, R. Zeis, and E. Bucher, High-mobility field-effect transistors based on transition metal dichalcogenides, Applied Physics Letters 84, 3301–3303 (2004)

work page 2004
[4]

Podzorov, E

V. Podzorov, E. Menard, A. Borissov, V. Kiryukhin, J. A. Rogers, and M. E. Gershenson, Intrinsic charge transport on the surface of organic semiconductors, Phys- ical Review Letters93(2004)

work page 2004
[5]

Sirringhaus, 25th anniversary article: Organic field- effect transistors: The path beyond amorphous silicon, Advanced Materials26, 1319–1335 (2014)

H. Sirringhaus, 25th anniversary article: Organic field- effect transistors: The path beyond amorphous silicon, Advanced Materials26, 1319–1335 (2014)

work page 2014
[6]

Irkhin, A

P. Irkhin, A. Ryasnyanskiy, M. Koehler, and I. Biag- gio, Absorption and photoluminescence spectroscopy of rubrene single crystals, Physical Review B86(2012)

work page 2012
[7]

Naeimi, T

M. Naeimi, T. V¨ olzer, R. Lange, K. Oldenburg, S. Lochbrunner, I. Barke, and S. Speller, Zone-sectored organic crystals with spatially resolved exciton dynamics, Advanced Optical Materials14(2025)

work page 2025
[8]

Nitta, K

J. Nitta, K. Miwa, N. Komiya, E. Annese, J. Fujii, S. Ono, and K. Sakamoto, The actual electronic band structure of a rubrene single crystal, Scientific Reports9 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

Clark and G

J. Clark and G. Lanzani, Organic photonics for commu- nications, Nature Photonics4, 438–446 (2010)

work page 2010
[10]

Braun, W

S. Braun, W. R. Salaneck, and M. Fahlman, Energy-level alignment at organic/metal and organic/organic inter- faces, Advanced Materials21, 1450–1472 (2009)

work page 2009
[11]

Ding and Y

H. Ding and Y. Gao, Electronic structure at rubrene metal interfaces, Applied Physics A95, 89–94 (2009)

work page 2009
[12]

H. S. Hwang, S. G. Jo, J. Lee, J. Kim, and J. Joo, Enhanced local and nonlocal photoluminescence of or- ganic rubrene microrods using surface plasmon of gold nanoparticles: Applications to ultrasensitive and remote biosensing, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C120, 11612–11620 (2016)

work page 2016
[13]

Hartmann, V

H. Hartmann, V. N. Popok, I. Barke, V. von Oeynhausen, and K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, Design and capabilities of an experimental setup based on magnetron sputtering for formation and deposition of size-selected metal clusters on ultra-clean surfaces, Review of Scientific Instruments 83(2012)

work page 2012
[14]

Oldenburg, K.-H

K. Oldenburg, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, and I. Barke, Nonlo- cal substrate effect on supported silver clusters revealed by lifted plasmon degeneracy, Physical Review Research 7(2025)

work page 2025
[15]

Galland, Y

C. Galland, Y. Ghosh, A. Steinbr¨ uck, J. A. Hollingsworth, H. Htoon, and V. I. Klimov, Life- time blinking in nonblinking nanocrystal quantum dots, Nature Communications3(2012)

work page 2012
[16]

F. D. Stefani, J. P. Hoogenboom, and E. Barkai, Be- yond quantum jumps: Blinking nanoscale light emitters, Physics Today62, 34–39 (2009)

work page 2009
[17]

A. A. Cordones and S. R. Leone, Mechanisms for charge trapping in single semiconductor nanocrystals probed by fluorescence blinking, Chemical Society Reviews42, 3209 (2013)

work page 2013
[18]

Tang and R

J. Tang and R. A. Marcus, Mechanisms of fluorescence blinking in semiconductor nanocrystal quantum dots, The Journal of Chemical Physics123, 10.1063/1.1993567 (2005)

work page doi:10.1063/1.1993567 2005
[19]

Ko, C.-T

H.-C. Ko, C.-T. Yuan, and J. Tang, Probing and con- trolling fluorescence blinking of single semiconductor nanoparticles, Nano Reviews2, 5895 (2011)

work page 2011
[20]

blinking

M. Kuno, D. P. Fromm, H. F. Hamann, A. Gallagher, and D. J. Nesbitt, Nonexponential “blinking” kinetics of sin- gle cdse quantum dots: A universal power law behavior, The Journal of Chemical Physics112, 3117–3120 (2000)

work page 2000
[21]

Pelton, D

M. Pelton, D. G. Grier, and P. Guyot-Sionnest, Charac- terizing quantum-dot blinking using noise power spectra, Applied Physics Letters85, 819–821 (2004)

work page 2004
[22]

Frantsuzov, M

P. Frantsuzov, M. Kuno, B. Jank´ o, and R. A. Mar- cus, Universal emission intermittency in quantum dots, nanorods and nanowires, Nature Physics4, 519–522 (2008)

work page 2008
[23]

Oldenburg, H

K. Oldenburg, H. Hartmann, J. Lerm´ e, M.-M. Pohl, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, I. Barke, and S. Speller, Virtual plasmonic dimers for ultrasensitive inspection of clus- ter–surface coupling, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C123, 1379–1388 (2018)

work page 2018
[24]

H. Yuan, E. Debroye, G. Caliandro, K. P. F. Janssen, J. van Loon, C. E. A. Kirschhock, J. A. Martens, J. Hofkens, and M. B. J. Roeffaers, Photoluminescence blinking of single-crystal methylammonium lead iodide perovskite nanorods induced by surface traps, ACS Omega1, 148–159 (2016)

work page 2016
[25]

Pfluegl and R

W. Pfluegl and R. J. Silbey, Long-time properties of ran- dom walks with a single trap, Physical Review E58, 4128–4133 (1998)

work page 1998
[26]

R. N. Mu˜ noz, L. Frazer, G. Yuan, P. Mulvaney, F. A. Pollock, and K. Modi, Memory in quantum dot blinking, Physical Review E106, 10.1103/physreve.106.014127 (2022)

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.106.014127 2022

[1] [1]

hot spots

resulting in strongly localized and enhanced electro- magnetic near fields at the wire-NP interface. This lo- cal field enhancement is expected to amplify exciton and carrier generation. A third determinant is the role of the quasi-1D rod geometry in combination with the wire-NP interfaces. Such rods confine roaming charge carriers and can act as active w...

work page

[2] [2]

S. Haas, A. F. Stassen, G. Schuck, K. P. Pernstich, D. J. Gundlach, B. Batlogg, U. Berens, and H.-J. Kirner, High charge-carrier mobility and low trap density in a rubrene 5 derivative, Physical Review B76(2007)

work page 2007

[3] [3]

Podzorov, M

V. Podzorov, M. E. Gershenson, C. Kloc, R. Zeis, and E. Bucher, High-mobility field-effect transistors based on transition metal dichalcogenides, Applied Physics Letters 84, 3301–3303 (2004)

work page 2004

[4] [4]

Podzorov, E

V. Podzorov, E. Menard, A. Borissov, V. Kiryukhin, J. A. Rogers, and M. E. Gershenson, Intrinsic charge transport on the surface of organic semiconductors, Phys- ical Review Letters93(2004)

work page 2004

[5] [5]

Sirringhaus, 25th anniversary article: Organic field- effect transistors: The path beyond amorphous silicon, Advanced Materials26, 1319–1335 (2014)

H. Sirringhaus, 25th anniversary article: Organic field- effect transistors: The path beyond amorphous silicon, Advanced Materials26, 1319–1335 (2014)

work page 2014

[6] [6]

Irkhin, A

P. Irkhin, A. Ryasnyanskiy, M. Koehler, and I. Biag- gio, Absorption and photoluminescence spectroscopy of rubrene single crystals, Physical Review B86(2012)

work page 2012

[7] [7]

Naeimi, T

M. Naeimi, T. V¨ olzer, R. Lange, K. Oldenburg, S. Lochbrunner, I. Barke, and S. Speller, Zone-sectored organic crystals with spatially resolved exciton dynamics, Advanced Optical Materials14(2025)

work page 2025

[8] [8]

Nitta, K

J. Nitta, K. Miwa, N. Komiya, E. Annese, J. Fujii, S. Ono, and K. Sakamoto, The actual electronic band structure of a rubrene single crystal, Scientific Reports9 (2019)

work page 2019

[9] [9]

Clark and G

J. Clark and G. Lanzani, Organic photonics for commu- nications, Nature Photonics4, 438–446 (2010)

work page 2010

[10] [10]

Braun, W

S. Braun, W. R. Salaneck, and M. Fahlman, Energy-level alignment at organic/metal and organic/organic inter- faces, Advanced Materials21, 1450–1472 (2009)

work page 2009

[11] [11]

Ding and Y

H. Ding and Y. Gao, Electronic structure at rubrene metal interfaces, Applied Physics A95, 89–94 (2009)

work page 2009

[12] [12]

H. S. Hwang, S. G. Jo, J. Lee, J. Kim, and J. Joo, Enhanced local and nonlocal photoluminescence of or- ganic rubrene microrods using surface plasmon of gold nanoparticles: Applications to ultrasensitive and remote biosensing, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C120, 11612–11620 (2016)

work page 2016

[13] [13]

Hartmann, V

H. Hartmann, V. N. Popok, I. Barke, V. von Oeynhausen, and K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, Design and capabilities of an experimental setup based on magnetron sputtering for formation and deposition of size-selected metal clusters on ultra-clean surfaces, Review of Scientific Instruments 83(2012)

work page 2012

[14] [14]

Oldenburg, K.-H

K. Oldenburg, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, and I. Barke, Nonlo- cal substrate effect on supported silver clusters revealed by lifted plasmon degeneracy, Physical Review Research 7(2025)

work page 2025

[15] [15]

Galland, Y

C. Galland, Y. Ghosh, A. Steinbr¨ uck, J. A. Hollingsworth, H. Htoon, and V. I. Klimov, Life- time blinking in nonblinking nanocrystal quantum dots, Nature Communications3(2012)

work page 2012

[16] [16]

F. D. Stefani, J. P. Hoogenboom, and E. Barkai, Be- yond quantum jumps: Blinking nanoscale light emitters, Physics Today62, 34–39 (2009)

work page 2009

[17] [17]

A. A. Cordones and S. R. Leone, Mechanisms for charge trapping in single semiconductor nanocrystals probed by fluorescence blinking, Chemical Society Reviews42, 3209 (2013)

work page 2013

[18] [18]

Tang and R

J. Tang and R. A. Marcus, Mechanisms of fluorescence blinking in semiconductor nanocrystal quantum dots, The Journal of Chemical Physics123, 10.1063/1.1993567 (2005)

work page doi:10.1063/1.1993567 2005

[19] [19]

Ko, C.-T

H.-C. Ko, C.-T. Yuan, and J. Tang, Probing and con- trolling fluorescence blinking of single semiconductor nanoparticles, Nano Reviews2, 5895 (2011)

work page 2011

[20] [20]

blinking

M. Kuno, D. P. Fromm, H. F. Hamann, A. Gallagher, and D. J. Nesbitt, Nonexponential “blinking” kinetics of sin- gle cdse quantum dots: A universal power law behavior, The Journal of Chemical Physics112, 3117–3120 (2000)

work page 2000

[21] [21]

Pelton, D

M. Pelton, D. G. Grier, and P. Guyot-Sionnest, Charac- terizing quantum-dot blinking using noise power spectra, Applied Physics Letters85, 819–821 (2004)

work page 2004

[22] [22]

Frantsuzov, M

P. Frantsuzov, M. Kuno, B. Jank´ o, and R. A. Mar- cus, Universal emission intermittency in quantum dots, nanorods and nanowires, Nature Physics4, 519–522 (2008)

work page 2008

[23] [23]

Oldenburg, H

K. Oldenburg, H. Hartmann, J. Lerm´ e, M.-M. Pohl, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, I. Barke, and S. Speller, Virtual plasmonic dimers for ultrasensitive inspection of clus- ter–surface coupling, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C123, 1379–1388 (2018)

work page 2018

[24] [24]

H. Yuan, E. Debroye, G. Caliandro, K. P. F. Janssen, J. van Loon, C. E. A. Kirschhock, J. A. Martens, J. Hofkens, and M. B. J. Roeffaers, Photoluminescence blinking of single-crystal methylammonium lead iodide perovskite nanorods induced by surface traps, ACS Omega1, 148–159 (2016)

work page 2016

[25] [25]

Pfluegl and R

W. Pfluegl and R. J. Silbey, Long-time properties of ran- dom walks with a single trap, Physical Review E58, 4128–4133 (1998)

work page 1998

[26] [26]

R. N. Mu˜ noz, L. Frazer, G. Yuan, P. Mulvaney, F. A. Pollock, and K. Modi, Memory in quantum dot blinking, Physical Review E106, 10.1103/physreve.106.014127 (2022)

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.106.014127 2022