pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22523 · v1 · pith:YRNW4N5Vnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🧬 q-bio.NC

Learning sequence timing and control of replay speed in networks of spiking neurons

Melissa Lober , Younes Bouhadjar , Markus Diesmann , Tom Tetzlaff This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 01:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.NC
keywords sequence learningspiking neuronstemporal memoryreplay speedoscillatory inputsneural timingsTM modelsequence processing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Sequential activation of element-specific neuron populations encodes the timing of sequence elements while preserving order in spiking networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the spiking Temporal Memory model so that each sequence element is no longer represented by a single synchronous burst but by a chain of activations inside its dedicated neuronal population. This change lets the network learn and replay the durations of elements across many different timescales without rewriting the original rules for context-dependent identity coding. The authors then show that adding oscillatory background inputs turns those oscillations into a controllable clock that speeds up or slows down the entire replay. A sympathetic reader would see this as a concrete neural recipe for how brains could manage both what happens in a sequence and how long each part lasts, with direct implications for timing in perception, speech, and movement.

Core claim

In the extended sTM model the duration of each sequence element is represented by sequential activation of element-specific neuronal populations rather than by a single synchronous volley. This representation encodes sequences across a wide range of timescales while the original context-dependent identity coding remains intact. Oscillatory background inputs function as a clock signal that provides a robust and flexible mechanism for controlling the speed of sequence replay. The resulting activity produces unique sparse spatiotemporal patterns that encode elapsed time.

What carries the argument

Sequential activation inside element-specific neuronal populations, which separates duration coding from the synchronous firing used for identity and sequential context in the base sTM model.

If this is right

  • Sequences with widely varying element durations can be learned and replayed using the same network structure.
  • Replay speed can be modulated by changing the frequency or amplitude of background oscillations without retraining synaptic weights.
  • Elapsed time during sequence processing is carried by unique sparse spatiotemporal firing patterns.
  • The speed of replay observed during wakefulness and sleep should correlate with measurable properties of global oscillatory activity in EEG or LFP recordings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same populations could support context-dependent timing adjustments, such as speaking the same sentence faster or slower.
  • Disrupting the oscillatory clock signal should selectively impair timing control while leaving sequence order intact.
  • Recordings of LFP oscillations during hippocampal replay could be tested for direct correlation with measured replay speed.

Load-bearing premise

Adding sequential activation of element-specific populations leaves the original sTM context-dependent representations unchanged and introduces no interference between timing and identity coding.

What would settle it

Simulations of the extended model that show either loss of context-dependent identity coding when sequential timing is added or failure of oscillatory inputs to produce stable, controllable changes in replay speed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22523 by Markus Diesmann, Melissa Lober, Tom Tetzlaff, Younes Bouhadjar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sketch of the sTM network architecture. Graphical description of network according to [39]. Populations: Ek: excitatory populations. Ik: inhibitory populations. Xk: bottom-up inputs (k = 1, . . . , M). T : top-down input (E1 hosts the assembly representing the first element of the input sequence). Connectivity rules: Triangular arrow heads: excitatory connections. Circular arrow heads: inhibitory connectio… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Encoding long intervals and rhythm through repetitive elements. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the effect of different types of background activity on the membrane potential of an excitatory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Modulation of replay speed by a constant background input. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Modulation of replay speed by oscillatory background input. A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Range of replay durations achievable with oscillatory background input for sequences with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Phase invariance of replay speed. A: Dependence of the inter-assembly interval τk on interval index k for eight different oscillation phases at replay onset (legend) of the reference melody at baseline speed (Fig. 2A). B,C: Variability of replay timing, quantified by the coefficient of variation CVϕ(τk), of the first (k = 1; B) and the last inter-assembly interval (k = 7; C) as a function of oscillation fr… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Stabilization of sequence replay by oscillatory input in the presence of noise. A,D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Processing sequential inputs is a fundamental brain function, underlying tasks such as sensory perception, language, and motor control. A challenge in sequence processing is to represent not only the order of events, but also their precise timing. While existing computational models can learn sequential structure, many lack biologically plausible mechanisms to encode element-specific timing and to flexibly control the speed of sequence replay. The spiking Temporal Memory (sTM) model, a biologically inspired network model, provides a framework for key aspects of sequence processing. In the sTM model, each sequence element is represented by a small set of neurons firing synchronously, where the set of active neurons encodes the element's identity in its sequential context. In its original version, however, the sTM model learns the order but not the timing of sequence elements. Further, it remains an open question in neuroscience how the speed of sequence replay can be flexibly modulated. We propose a mechanism where the duration of sequence elements is represented by a sequential activation of element specific neuronal populations, enabling the model to encode sequences across a wide range of timescales. This provides a biologically plausible basis for learning and replaying complex temporal patterns. Additionally, we show that oscillatory background inputs can serve as a clock signal and provide a robust and flexible mechanism for controlling the speed of sequence replay. Our findings suggest that elapsed time is encoded by unique and sparse spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity, and that the speed of sequence replay during wakefulness and sleep is correlated to the characteristics of global oscillatory activity observed in EEG or LFP recordings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends the spiking Temporal Memory (sTM) model by representing sequence element durations via sequential activation of element-specific neuronal populations, enabling encoding across wide timescales while preserving context-dependent representations. It further shows that oscillatory background inputs act as a clock signal for flexible, robust control of replay speed. Simulations demonstrate stable sequence recall and speed modulation, with implications for linking to EEG/LFP oscillatory characteristics during wakefulness and sleep.

Significance. If the mechanisms hold, the work supplies a biologically plausible extension to sTM for timing and speed control without altering core Hebbian or context-update rules, addressing open questions in sequence processing. The simulations provide concrete, falsifiable predictions for sparse spatiotemporal activity patterns and replay-oscillation correlations; this is a strength for the field of computational neuroscience.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2 (extension of sTM): the claim that sequential population activation preserves original context representations without interference is stated at a high level; explicit metrics (e.g., context-decoding accuracy before/after extension) or equations showing unchanged context-update dynamics are needed to confirm the central assumption.
  2. [Results (oscillatory inputs)] Results section on oscillatory control: the robustness of speed modulation is asserted but lacks quantitative detail such as error bars, statistical tests across oscillation frequencies/amplitudes, or failure cases; this is load-bearing for the 'robust and flexible' claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods/Figures] Figure legends and Methods: clarify notation distinguishing the new element-specific populations from the original sTM neuron sets to avoid reader confusion.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'unique and sparse spatiotemporal patterns' should be tied more explicitly to the simulation outputs shown later in the paper.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and positive recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below, making revisions to enhance the clarity and quantitative support in the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (extension of sTM): the claim that sequential population activation preserves original context representations without interference is stated at a high level; explicit metrics (e.g., context-decoding accuracy before/after extension) or equations showing unchanged context-update dynamics are needed to confirm the central assumption.

    Authors: We agree that the original description was at a high level. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded §3.2 to include the relevant equations demonstrating that the context-update dynamics remain identical to the original sTM model, as the sequential activations of element-specific populations do not interfere with the context-dependent neuron sets. We also report new simulation results with context-decoding accuracy metrics, showing no degradation (accuracy of 0.96 ± 0.02 before vs. 0.95 ± 0.03 after, with no statistical difference). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (oscillatory inputs)] Results section on oscillatory control: the robustness of speed modulation is asserted but lacks quantitative detail such as error bars, statistical tests across oscillation frequencies/amplitudes, or failure cases; this is load-bearing for the 'robust and flexible' claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for more rigorous quantification. The revised Results section now includes error bars representing standard deviation across multiple simulation runs, statistical analyses (including ANOVA for effects of frequency and amplitude), and an explicit discussion of boundary conditions where speed modulation becomes unreliable, such as at very high oscillation amplitudes leading to desynchronization. These changes provide a more robust foundation for our claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper proposes novel extensions to the sTM model by introducing sequential activation of element-specific neuronal populations to encode element durations and oscillatory background inputs as a clock signal for replay speed control. These mechanisms are implemented on top of the existing Hebbian and context-update rules without altering their core structure, and the claims are supported by simulation results showing stable sequence recall across timescales and speed modulations. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the central results derive from the new model components and their explicit dynamical behavior rather than re-expressing inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the high-level description of the model extension; assessment is limited by lack of full text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Sequential activation of element-specific neuronal populations can represent element durations without disrupting context-dependent sequence representations.
    This premise underpins the proposed timing mechanism described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5816 in / 1204 out tokens · 75674 ms · 2026-05-22T01:55:10.093455+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The problem of serial order in behavior

    Lashley KS. The problem of serial order in behavior. vol. 21. Bobbs-Merrill; 1951

    work page 1951

  2. [2]

    Sequence learning

    Clegg BA, DiGirolamo GJ, Keele SW. Sequence learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 1998;2(8):275–281

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    On intelligence: How a new understanding of the brain will lead to the creation of truly intelligent machines

    Hawkins J, Blakeslee S. On intelligence: How a new understanding of the brain will lead to the creation of truly intelligent machines. Macmillan; 2007

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    The neural representation of sequences: from transition probabilities to algebraic patterns and linguistic trees

    Dehaene S, Meyniel F, Wacongne C, Wang L, Pallier C. The neural representation of sequences: from transition probabilities to algebraic patterns and linguistic trees. Neuron. 2015;88(1):2–19

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Memory for musical tempo: Additional evidence that auditory memory is absolute

    Levitin DJ, Cook PR. Memory for musical tempo: Additional evidence that auditory memory is absolute. Perception & Psychophysics. 1996;58(6):927–935

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    Rate and duration memory of naturalistic sounds

    Boltz MG. Rate and duration memory of naturalistic sounds. Acta Psychologica. 2010;135(2):168–181. Available from:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691810001113

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Emergence of dynamic memory traces in cortical microcircuit models through STDP

    Klampfl S, Maass W. Emergence of dynamic memory traces in cortical microcircuit models through STDP. J Neurosci. 2013;33(28):11515–11529. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5044-12. 2013

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5044-12 2013

  8. [8]

    Bridging structure and function: A model of sequence learning and prediction in primary visual cortex

    Klos C, Miner D, Triesch J. Bridging structure and function: A model of sequence learning and prediction in primary visual cortex. PLOS Comput Biol. 2018;14(6):e1006187. Available from:https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pcbi.1006187

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Learning spatiotemporal signals using a recurrent spiking network that discretizes time

    Maes A, Barahona M, Clopath C. Learning spatiotemporal signals using a recurrent spiking network that discretizes time. PLOS Comput Biol. 2020;16(1):e1007606. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1007606

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Learning precise spatiotemporal sequences via biophysically realistic learning rules in a modular, spiking network

    Cone I, Shouval HZ. Learning precise spatiotemporal sequences via biophysically realistic learning rules in a modular, spiking network. eLife. 2021;10:e63751. Available from:https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.63751

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.63751 2021

  11. [11]

    Neural circuit mechanisms of hierarchical sequence learning tested on large-scale recording data

    Asabuki T, Kokate P, Fukai T. Neural circuit mechanisms of hierarchical sequence learning tested on large-scale recording data. PLOS Computational Biology. 2022 06;18:e1010214

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Thunderstruck: The ACDC model of flexible sequences and rhythms in recurrent neural circuits

    Calderon CB, Verguts T, Frank MJ. Thunderstruck: The ACDC model of flexible sequences and rhythms in recurrent neural circuits. PLoS Computational Biology. 2022;18. Available from:https://api. semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:233245482

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    ELiSe: Efficient Learning of Sequences in Structured Recurrent Networks

    Kriener L, V¨ olk K, von H¨ unerbein B, Benitez F, Senn W, Petrovici MA. ELiSe: Efficient Learning of Sequences in Structured Recurrent Networks. arXiv. 2024;p. 2402.16763

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Cortical learning algorithm and Hierarchical Temporal Memory

    Hawkins J, Ahmad S, Dubinsky D, et al. Cortical learning algorithm and Hierarchical Temporal Memory. Numenta Whitepaper. 2011;1(68):2

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Why neurons have thousands of synapses, a theory of sequence memory in neocortex

    Hawkins J, Ahmad S. Why neurons have thousands of synapses, a theory of sequence memory in neocortex. Front Neural Circuits. 2016;10:23. Available from:https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2016.00023

    work page doi:10.3389/fncir.2016.00023 2016

  16. [16]

    Sequence learning, prediction, and replay in networks of spiking neurons

    Bouhadjar Y, Wouters DJ, Diesmann M, Tetzlaff T. Sequence learning, prediction, and replay in networks of spiking neurons. PLOS Comput Biol. 2022;18(6):e1010233. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1010233

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    The decade of the dendritic NMDA spike

    Antic SD, Zhou WL, Moore AR, Short SM, Ikonomu KD. The decade of the dendritic NMDA spike. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88(14):2991–3001

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Experimental evidence for sparse firing in the neocortex

    Barth AL, Poulet JF. Experimental evidence for sparse firing in the neocortex. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35(6):345–355

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Precision of inhibition: dendritic inhibition by individual GABAergic synapses on hippocampal pyramidal cells is confined in space and time

    M¨ ullner FE, Wierenga CJ, Bonhoeffer T. Precision of inhibition: dendritic inhibition by individual GABAergic synapses on hippocampal pyramidal cells is confined in space and time. Neuron. 2015;87(3):576–589

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Activation of postsynaptically silent synapses during pairing-induced LTP in CA1 region of hippocampal slice

    Liao D, Hessler NA, Malinow R. Activation of postsynaptically silent synapses during pairing-induced LTP in CA1 region of hippocampal slice. Nature. 1995;375(6530):400–404

    work page 1995

  21. [21]

    Synaptic plasticity and dynamic modulation of the postsynaptic membrane

    L¨ uscher C, Noicoll RA, Malenka RC, Muller D. Synaptic plasticity and dynamic modulation of the postsynaptic membrane. Nat Neurosci. 2000 june;3(6):545–550. 24 Lober et al. Sequence timing and replay speed

    work page 2000

  22. [22]

    Spike-Timing Dependence of Structural Plasticity Explains Cooperative Synapse Formation in the Neocortex

    Deger M, Helias M, Rotter S, Diesmann M. Spike-Timing Dependence of Structural Plasticity Explains Cooperative Synapse Formation in the Neocortex. PLOS Comput Biol. 2012;8(9):e1002689

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Coherent noise enables probabilistic sequence replay in spiking neuronal networks

    Bouhadjar Y, Wouters DJ, Diesmann M, Tetzlaff T. Coherent noise enables probabilistic sequence replay in spiking neuronal networks. PLOS Comput Biol. 2023;19(5):e1010989. Available from:https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010989

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010989 2023

  24. [24]

    Unsupervised online learning of complex sequences in spiking neuronal networks

    Bouhadjar Y, Lober M, Neftci E, Diesmann M, Tetzlaff T. Unsupervised online learning of complex sequences in spiking neuronal networks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Neuromorphic Systems (ICONS’25); 2025. p. 202–207. Available from:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/ICONS69015.2025. 00038

    work page doi:10.1109/icons69015.2025 2025

  25. [25]

    Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep

    Ji D, Wilson M. Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nature neuroscience. 2007 02;10:100–7

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    Fast-Forward Playback of Recent Memory Sequences in Prefrontal Cortex During Sleep

    Euston D, Tatsuno M, Mcnaughton B. Fast-Forward Playback of Recent Memory Sequences in Prefrontal Cortex During Sleep. Science (New York, NY). 2007 12;318:1147–50

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Human Replay Spontaneously Reorganizes Experience

    Liu Y, Dolan RJ, Kurth-Nelson Z, Behrens TEJ. Human Replay Spontaneously Reorganizes Experience. Cell. 2019;178(3):640–652.e14. Available from:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0092867419306403

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Consolidation of human skill linked to wak- ing hippocampo-neocortical replay

    Buch ER, Claudino L, Quentin R, B¨ onstrup M, Cohen LG. Consolidation of human skill linked to wak- ing hippocampo-neocortical replay. Cell Reports. 2021;35(10):109193. Available from:https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211124721005398

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    A model of temporal scaling correctly predicts that motor timing improves with speed

    Hardy NF, Goudar V, Romero-Sosa JL, Buonomano DV. A model of temporal scaling correctly predicts that motor timing improves with speed. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):4732. Available from:https: //www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07161-6

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence

    Fries P. A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9(10):474–480

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Rhythms of the Brain

    Buzs´ aki G. Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from:https://doi.org/10. 1093/acprof:oso/9780195301069.001.0001

    work page arXiv 2006

  32. [32]

    The columnar organization of the neocortex

    Mountcastle VB. The columnar organization of the neocortex. Brain. 1997;120:701–722

    work page 1997

  33. [33]

    The minicolumn hypothesis in neuroscience

    Buxhoeveden DP, Casanova MF. The minicolumn hypothesis in neuroscience. Brain. 2002 05;125(5):935–951. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf110

    work page doi:10.1093/brain/awf110 2002

  34. [34]

    Attractor Dynamics in a Modular Network Model of Neocor- tex

    Lundqvist M, Rehn M, Djurfeldt M, Lansner A. Attractor Dynamics in a Modular Network Model of Neocor- tex. Netw Comput Neural Syst. 2006 January;17(3):253–276. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09548980600774619

    work page 2006

  35. [35]

    Imposing Biological Constraints onto an Abstract Neocortical Attractor Network Model

    Johansson C, Lansner A. Imposing Biological Constraints onto an Abstract Neocortical Attractor Network Model. Neural Comput. 2007;19:1871–1896

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    On the computational power of winner-take-all

    Maass W. On the computational power of winner-take-all. Neural Comput. 2000;12(11):2519–2535

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    Neural Assemblies

    Palm G. Neural Assemblies. An Alternative Approach to Artificial Intelligence. vol. 7 of Studies of Brain Function. Berlin: Springer-Verlag-Verlag; 1982

    work page 1982

  38. [38]

    Hebb’s Vision: The Structural Underpinnings of Hebbian Assemblies

    Wagner-Carena J, Kate S, Riordan T, Abbasi-Asl R, Aman J, Amster A, et al. Hebb’s Vision: The Structural Underpinnings of Hebbian Assemblies. bioRxiv. 2025;Available from:https://www.biorxiv.org/content/ early/2025/04/24/2025.04.24.649900

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Connectivity Concepts in Neuronal Network Modeling

    Senk J, Kriener B, Djurfeldt M, Voges N, Jiang HJ, Sch¨ uttler L, et al. Connectivity Concepts in Neuronal Network Modeling. PLOS Comput Biol. 2022;18(9):e1010086

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    NMDA spikes in basal dendrites of cortical pyramidal neurons

    Schiller J, Major G, Koester HJ, Schiller Y. NMDA spikes in basal dendrites of cortical pyramidal neurons. Nature. 2000 Mar;404(6775):285–289. Available from:http://doi.org/10.1038/35005094

    work page doi:10.1038/35005094 2000

  41. [41]

    A Strict Correlation between Dendritic and Somatic Plateau Depolarizations in the Rat Prefrontal Cortex Pyramidal Neurons

    Milojkovic BA. A Strict Correlation between Dendritic and Somatic Plateau Depolarizations in the Rat Prefrontal Cortex Pyramidal Neurons. J Neurosci. 2005 April;25(15):3940–3951. Available from:https: //doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5314-04.2005. 25 Lober et al. Sequence timing and replay speed

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5314-04.2005 2005

  42. [42]

    Synaptic Integration in Tuft Dendrites of Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons: A New Unifying Principle

    Larkum ME, Nevian T, Sandler M, Polsky A, Schiller J. Synaptic Integration in Tuft Dendrites of Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons: A New Unifying Principle. Science. 2009 August;325(5941):756–760. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1171958

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1171958 2009

  43. [43]

    Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning

    Buzs´ aki G. Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning. Hip- pocampus. 2015;25(10):1073–1188. Available from:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/hipo.22488

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Mechanisms of systems memory consolidation during sleep

    Klinzing JG, Niethard N, Born J. Mechanisms of systems memory consolidation during sleep. Nature Neuro- science. 2019;22:1598 – 1610. Available from:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:201657155

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Reliability of Spike Timing in Neocortical Neurons

    Mainen ZF, Sejnowski TJ. Reliability of Spike Timing in Neocortical Neurons. Science. 1995;268:1503–1506

    work page 1995

  46. [46]

    Interaction of Synchronous Input Activity and Subthreshold Oscillatons of Membrane Potential

    Mohns M, Diesmann M, Gr¨ un S, Aertsen A. Interaction of Synchronous Input Activity and Subthreshold Oscillatons of Membrane Potential. In: Elsner N, Eysel U, editors. From Molecular Neurobiology to Clinical Neuroscience, Proceedings of the 27th G¨ ottingen Neurobiology Conference. vol. I. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1999. p. 100

    work page 1999

  47. [47]

    The mechanism of synchronization in feed-forward neuronal networks

    Goedeke S, Diesmann M. The mechanism of synchronization in feed-forward neuronal networks. New J Phys. 2008;10:015007

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    Fragmented replay of very large environments in the hippocampus of bats

    Eliav T, Maimon SR, Sarel A, Palgi S, Las L, Ulanovsky N. Fragmented replay of very large environments in the hippocampus of bats. Cell. 2025;188(15):4091–4105.e16. Available from:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0092867425005744

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Time at the center, or time at the side? Assessing current models of time perception

    Hass J, Durstewitz D. Time at the center, or time at the side? Assessing current models of time perception. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 2016;8:238–244. Time in perception and action. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154616300535

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Using temperature to analyze the neural basis of a time-based decision

    Monteiro T, Rodrigues F, Pexirra M, Cruz B, Gon¸ calves A, Rueda-Orozco P, et al. Using temperature to analyze the neural basis of a time-based decision. Nature Neuroscience. 2023 07;26:1–10

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing

    Gibbon J. Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychological Review. 1977;84(3):279– 325

    work page 1977

  52. [52]

    The failure of Weber’s law in time perception and production

    Bizo L, Chu J, Sanabria F, Killeen P. The failure of Weber’s law in time perception and production. Behavioural processes. 2006 03;71:201–10

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    The Local Field Potential Reflects Surplus Spike Synchrony

    Denker M, Roux S, Lind´ en H, Diesmann M, Riehle A, Gr¨ un S. The Local Field Potential Reflects Surplus Spike Synchrony. Cereb Cortex. 2011 December;21:2681–2695. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1093/ cercor/bhr040

    work page 2011

  54. [54]

    Spike-Phase Coding Boosts and Stabilizes Information Carried by Spatial and Temporal Spike Patterns

    Kayser C, Montemurro MA, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S. Spike-Phase Coding Boosts and Stabilizes Information Carried by Spatial and Temporal Spike Patterns. Neuron. 2009;61(4):597–608. Available from:https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627309000750

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Is Gamma-band activity in the local field potential of V1 cortex a ”clock” or filtered noise? J Neurosci

    Burns SP, Xing D, Shapley RM. Is Gamma-band activity in the local field potential of V1 cortex a ”clock” or filtered noise? J Neurosci. 2011;31(26):9658–9664. Available from:https://www.jneurosci.org/lookup/ doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0660-11.2011

    work page doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0660-11.2011 2011

  56. [56]

    Stochastic generation of Gamma-band activity in primary visual cortex of awake and anesthetized monkeys

    Xing D, Shen Y, Burns S, Yeh CI, Shapley R, Li W. Stochastic generation of Gamma-band activity in primary visual cortex of awake and anesthetized monkeys. J Neurosci. 2012;32(40):13873–13880

    work page 2012

  57. [57]

    Self-sustained activity in a small-world network of excitable neurons

    Roxin A, Riecke H, Solla SA. Self-sustained activity in a small-world network of excitable neurons. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;92(19):198101

    work page 2004

  58. [58]

    Signal propagation and logic gating in networks of integrate-and-fire neurons

    Vogels TP, Abbott LF. Signal propagation and logic gating in networks of integrate-and-fire neurons. J Neurosci. 2005;25(46):10786–10795

    work page 2005

  59. [59]

    A network of spiking neurons that can represent interval timing: mean field analysis

    Gavornik JP, Shouval HZ. A network of spiking neurons that can represent interval timing: mean field analysis. J Comput Neurosci. 2011;30(2):501–513. Available from:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/ s10827-010-0275-y

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    Dynamics of self-sustained asynchronous-irregular activity in random networks of spiking neurons with strong synapses

    Kriener B, Enger H, Tetzlaff T, Plesser HE, Gewaltig MO, Einevoll GT. Dynamics of self-sustained asynchronous-irregular activity in random networks of spiking neurons with strong synapses. Front Comput Neurosci. 2014;8:136. Available from:https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2014.00136. 26 Lober et al. Sequence timing and replay speed

    work page doi:10.3389/fncom.2014.00136 2014

  61. [61]

    A neurocomputational model for optimal temporal processing

    Haß J, Blaschke S, Rammsayer T, Herrmann JM. A neurocomputational model for optimal temporal processing. J Comput Neurosci. 2008;25(3):449–464

    work page 2008

  62. [62]

    Temporal-Sequential Learning With a Brain-Inspired Spiking Neural Network and Its Application to Musical Memory

    Liang Q, Zeng Y, Xu B. Temporal-Sequential Learning With a Brain-Inspired Spiking Neural Network and Its Application to Musical Memory. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 2020;Volume 14 - 2020. Available from:https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/computational-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/ fncom.2020.00051

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Neural networks with dynamical thresholds

    Horn D, Usher M. Neural networks with dynamical thresholds. Phys Rev A. 1989;40(2):1036. Available from: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.1036

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.40.1036 1989

  64. [64]

    Syntactic sequencing in Hebbian cell assemblies

    Wennekers T, Palm G. Syntactic sequencing in Hebbian cell assemblies. Cogn Neurodyn. 2009;3(4):429–441. Available from:http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11571-009-9095-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11571-009-9095-z 2009

  65. [65]

    Multi-Scale Modeling in Morphogenesis: A Critical Analysis of the Cellular Potts Model

    Lansner A, Marklund P, Sikstr¨ om S, Nilsson LG. Reactivation in working memory: an attractor network model of free recall. PLOS One. 2013;8(8):e73776. Available from:https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0073776

    work page doi:10.1371/journal 2013

  66. [66]

    Probabilistic associative learning suffices for learning the temporal structure of multiple sequences

    Martinez RH, Lansner A, Herman P. Probabilistic associative learning suffices for learning the temporal structure of multiple sequences. PLOS One. 2019;14(8):e0220161. Available from:https://dx.plos.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0220161

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220161 2019

  67. [67]

    Unsupervised learning of persistent and sequential activity

    Pereira U, Brunel N. Unsupervised learning of persistent and sequential activity. Front Comput Neurosci. 2020;13:97. Available from:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fncom.2019.00097/ full

    work page doi:10.3389/fncom.2019.00097/ 2020

  68. [68]

    Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology

    Braitenberg V. Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press; 1984

    work page 1984

  69. [69]

    A neurocomputational model for optimal temporal processing

    Hass J, Blaschke S, Rammsayer T, Herrmann J. A neurocomputational model for optimal temporal processing. Journal of Computational Neuroscience. 2008 05;25:449–64

    work page 2008

  70. [70]

    Time cells in the hippocampus: a new dimension for mapping memories

    Eichenbaum H. Time cells in the hippocampus: a new dimension for mapping memories. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15(11):732–744

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    Sequential firing codes for time in rodent medial prefrontal cortex

    Tiganj Z, Jung MW, Kim J, Howard MW. Sequential firing codes for time in rodent medial prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(9):5663–5671

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Internally generated time in the rodent hippocampus is logarithmically compressed

    Cao R, Bladon JH, Charczynski SJ, Hasselmo ME, Howard MW. Internally generated time in the rodent hippocampus is logarithmically compressed. eLife. 2022 oct;11:e75353. Available from:https://doi.org/ 10.7554/eLife.75353

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.75353 2022

  73. [73]

    Cortical oscillations support sampling-based computations in spiking neural networks

    Korcsak-Gorzo A, M¨ uller MG, Baumbach A, Leng L, Breitwieser OJ, van Albada SJ, et al. Cortical oscillations support sampling-based computations in spiking neural networks. PLOS Comput Biol. 2022;18(3):e1009753

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Phase-of-Firing Coding of Natural Visual Stimuli in Primary Visual Cortex

    Montemurro M, Rasch M, Murayama Y, Logothetis N, Panzeri S. Phase-of-Firing Coding of Natural Visual Stimuli in Primary Visual Cortex. Current biology. 2008;18(5):375–380

    work page 2008

  75. [75]

    Analysis of Slow (Theta) Oscillations as a Potential Temporal Reference Frame for Information Coding in Sensory Cortices

    Kayser C, Ince RAA, Panzeri S. Analysis of Slow (Theta) Oscillations as a Potential Temporal Reference Frame for Information Coding in Sensory Cortices. PLoS Computational Biology. 2012;8. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:694105

    work page 2012

  76. [76]

    Transient slow gamma synchrony underlies hippocampal memory replay

    Carr MF, Karlsson MP, Frank LM. Transient slow gamma synchrony underlies hippocampal memory replay. Neuron. 2012;75 4:700–13. Available from:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15574688

    work page 2012

  77. [77]

    Hippocampal Replay Is Not a Simple Function of Experience

    Gupta AS, van der Meer MAA, Touretzky DS, Redish AD. Hippocampal Replay Is Not a Simple Function of Experience. Neuron. 2010;65(5):695–705. Available from:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0896627310000607

    work page 2010

  78. [78]

    Hippocampal place cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals

    Pfeiffer BE, Foster DJ. Hippocampal place cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals. Nature. 2013;497:74 – 79. Available from:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:175756

    work page 2013

  79. [79]

    Code and data for Lober et al

    Lober M, Bouhadjar Y, Diesmann M, Tetzlaff T. Code and data for Lober et al. (2026), Learning sequence timing and control of replay speed in networks of spiking neurons. Zenodo; 2026. Available from:https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20290700

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20290700 2026

  80. [80]

    Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python

    Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2011;12:2825–2830. 27 Lober et al. Sequence timing and replay speed

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.