pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23286 · v1 · pith:NNGDCOMVnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🪐 quant-ph

Modeling the Quantum Photon Statistics in Hybrid Light-Matter Integrated Circuits

Mathias Van Regemortel , Vincenzo Ardizzone , Eugenio Maggiolini , Armando Rastelli , Daniele Sanvitto , Thomas Van Vaerenbergh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 04:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords exciton-polaritonsquantum photon statisticsnonlinear waveguidesbosonic circuit modellight-matter couplingphoton antibunchingintegrated quantum photonicsslow-light engineering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mapping pulsed nonlinear waveguide dynamics to a bosonic quantum circuit model with dissipation predicts measurable non-classical photon statistics in polaritonic circuits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a quantitative framework that links realistic (Al)GaAs waveguide parameters to observable quantum signatures such as antibunching and sub-Poissonian statistics in the few-particle regime. It achieves this by converting the pulsed dynamics of nonlinear waveguides into an explicit bosonic quantum circuit representation that includes dissipation. The model is applied to two setups: a single waveguide with free-space interferometry and a fully integrated multimode coupled-waveguide circuit. It further demonstrates that engineering the polariton dispersion for slow light can increase the effective nonlinearity enough to reach non-Gaussian statistics.

Core claim

By mapping the pulsed nonlinear waveguide dynamics onto a bosonic quantum circuit representation that explicitly incorporates dissipation, we identify experimentally accessible quantum signatures across two circuit configurations: a single waveguide in a free-space interferometric configuration and a fully integrated multimode coupled-waveguide circuit. We further show that slow-light engineering of the polariton dispersion offers a practical route to amplifying the effective nonlinearity, pushing quantum signatures beyond Gaussian statistics.

What carries the argument

The bosonic quantum circuit representation with explicit dissipation, which converts the nonlinear waveguide dynamics into a circuit model that yields the quantum photon statistics.

Load-bearing premise

The bosonic quantum circuit representation with explicit dissipation accurately reproduces the quantum statistics of the underlying polariton system in the few-particle regime for the chosen (Al)GaAs parameters.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of photon number correlations or second-order coherence in an (Al)GaAs polariton waveguide that shows clear quantitative mismatch with the circuit-model predictions under pulsed excitation in the few-particle limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23286 by Armando Rastelli, Daniele Sanvitto, Eugenio Maggiolini, Mathias Van Regemortel, Thomas Van Vaerenbergh, Vincenzo Ardizzone.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The experimental LP dispersion in an AlGaAs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The Mach-Zehnder interferometer setup for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Results for the out-coupled photon statistics of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The prototype architecture studied for the first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The simulation results of a circuit of L = 6 waveguides and depth D = 5, for experimentally reported exciton interaction strengths, for zero losses and φrel = 0.6π. (a) The output pulse intensities (pulse photon number) for ℏg = 10µeV µm2 (indistinguishable from ℏg = [50, 700] µeV µm2 ). (b) The expected intra-pulse intensity-intensity correlations. Strong antibunched photon statistics is witnessed at low … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The lossless (solid lines) and lossy (dashed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The signal intensity (a) and density autocorrelation (b) in the symmetric (blue lines) and antisymmetric (orange lines) and cross-correlated (black lines) MZI output, considering 0 dB (solid), 0.97 dB (dashed), 1.93 (dot-dashed) and 2.90 dB (dotted) coupling losses. Same interferometer as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The intensity (panel (a)-(b)) and density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Results for different relative phase shifts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The results for different relative phase shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Strong light-matter coupling between a guided electromagnetic mode and an excitonic semiconductor transition gives rise to exciton-polaritons with optical nonlinearities far exceeding those of conventional photonic platforms. Utilizing these nonlinearities in the few-particle regime, where quantum signatures such as photon antibunching, sub-Poissonian statistics and non-trivial inter-mode correlations become accessible, is a central goal of integrated quantum photonics. Yet, a quantitative theoretical framework connecting realistic waveguide parameters to measurable non-classical photonic output is absent. Here, we present a comprehensive framework for predicting and benchmarking quantum photon statistics in polaritonic integrated circuits, using state-of-the-art experimentally achieved device parameters for (Al)GaAs waveguide platforms. By mapping the pulsed nonlinear waveguide dynamics onto a bosonic quantum circuit representation that explicitly incorporates dissipation, we identify experimentally accessible quantum signatures across two circuit configurations: a single waveguide in a free-space interferometric configuration and a fully integrated multimode coupled-waveguide circuit. We further show that slow-light engineering of the polariton dispersion offers a practical route to amplifying the effective nonlinearity, pushing quantum signatures beyond Gaussian statistics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theoretical framework for predicting quantum photon statistics in exciton-polariton integrated circuits by mapping the dynamics of pulsed nonlinear waveguides onto a bosonic quantum circuit model that includes dissipation. Using experimentally realized (Al)GaAs device parameters, it analyzes two configurations (free-space interferometric single waveguide and fully integrated multimode coupled waveguides) and shows that slow-light engineering can amplify effective nonlinearity to access non-Gaussian signatures such as antibunching and sub-Poissonian statistics.

Significance. If the bosonic-circuit mapping is shown to be faithful, the work supplies a practical, parameter-driven tool for designing polaritonic devices that target measurable non-classical light, directly addressing the stated absence of quantitative links between realistic waveguide parameters and quantum output. The explicit use of measured device parameters and the focus on experimentally accessible signatures are strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3 (mapping section)] The central mapping from continuous pulsed waveguide dynamics to the discrete bosonic circuit (including the construction of the dissipation operators and the truncation scheme) is not accompanied by any cross-validation against the original waveguide model or against exact few-particle numerics; without such a test the claim that the circuit reproduces the polariton quantum statistics remains unverified and is load-bearing for all subsequent predictions.
  2. [Results sections on single- and multimode circuits] No error analysis or convergence study with respect to particle-number cutoff or mode discretization is reported; this directly affects the reliability of the reported antibunching and correlation values in the few-particle regime.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for the polariton operators and the circuit Hamiltonian should be introduced with an explicit table or equation list to avoid ambiguity when comparing the two circuit configurations.
  2. [Figures 2–4] Figure captions for the quantum-signature plots should state the precise truncation level and dissipation parameters used so that the results are reproducible from the text alone.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3 (mapping section)] The central mapping from continuous pulsed waveguide dynamics to the discrete bosonic circuit (including the construction of the dissipation operators and the truncation scheme) is not accompanied by any cross-validation against the original waveguide model or against exact few-particle numerics; without such a test the claim that the circuit reproduces the polariton quantum statistics remains unverified and is load-bearing for all subsequent predictions.

    Authors: We agree that explicit cross-validation strengthens the central claim. The mapping is constructed by temporal discretization of the pulsed waveguide into bosonic modes, with dissipation operators obtained directly from the imaginary part of the polariton dispersion relation and truncation justified by the low-occupancy regime. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection in §3 that compares the circuit model against exact few-particle diagonalization for small systems and against direct integration of the waveguide master equation, confirming quantitative agreement for the parameters used in the paper. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results sections on single- and multimode circuits] No error analysis or convergence study with respect to particle-number cutoff or mode discretization is reported; this directly affects the reliability of the reported antibunching and correlation values in the few-particle regime.

    Authors: We acknowledge that convergence data are needed to establish the reliability of the quoted correlation values. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix (or subsection) that reports the dependence of g^(2)(0) and inter-mode correlations on both the particle-number cutoff and the number of retained temporal/spatial modes, demonstrating that the reported figures converge to within the stated precision for the cutoffs employed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: framework maps external device parameters to circuit model without reduction to fitted inputs

full rationale

The abstract and reader's summary present the central derivation as a mapping of pulsed nonlinear waveguide dynamics onto a bosonic quantum circuit representation, using state-of-the-art experimentally achieved (Al)GaAs device parameters as direct inputs. No equations or steps are shown that define a quantity in terms of itself, rename a fit as a prediction, or rely on self-citation chains for uniqueness. The framework is described as connecting realistic waveguide parameters to measurable outputs, with the mapping treated as an independent modeling step rather than a tautology. This matches the default expectation of self-contained, non-circular modeling when external benchmarks and parameters are invoked.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the central claim rests on the validity of the bosonic mapping and standard quantum optics assumptions rather than new fitted parameters or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Polaritons can be treated as bosons with nonlinear interactions and explicit dissipation in the few-particle regime.
    The mapping to a quantum circuit representation presupposes this standard treatment of exciton-polaritons.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5735 in / 1245 out tokens · 26817 ms · 2026-05-25T04:40:25.172040+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Vladimirova, S

    M. Vladimirova, S. Cronenberger, D. Scalbert, K. V. Kavokin, A. Miard, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, J. Bloch, D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, and A. V. Kavokin. Polariton-polariton interaction constants in microcavities.Physical Review B, 82(7):075301, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Estrecho, T

    E. Estrecho, T. Gao, N. Bobrovska, D. Comber-Todd, M. D. Fraser, M. Steger, K. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, J. Levin- sen, M. M. Parish, T. C. H. Liew, M. Matuszewski, D. W. Snoke, A. G. Truscott, and E. A. Ostrovskaya. Direct measurement of polariton-polariton interaction strength in the Thomas-Fermi regime of exciton-polariton conden- sation.Physical Review B,...

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Quantum fluids of light.Reviews of Modern Physics, 85(1):299–366, 2013

    Iacopo Carusotto and Cristiano Ciuti. Quantum fluids of light.Reviews of Modern Physics, 85(1):299–366, 2013

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Bose–einstein condensation of exciton polaritons.Nature, 443(7110):409–414, 2006

    Jacek Kasprzak, Murielle Richard, Stefan Kundermann, A Baas, P Jeambrun, Jonathan Mark James Keeling, Francesca Maria Marchetti, MH Szyma´ nska, R Andr´ e, JL a Staehli, et al. Bose–einstein condensation of exciton polaritons.Nature, 443(7110):409–414, 2006

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Exciton-polariton bose-einstein condensation.Reviews of modern physics, 82(2):1489–1537, 2010

    Hui Deng, Hartmut Haug, and Yoshihisa Yamamoto. Exciton-polariton bose-einstein condensation.Reviews of modern physics, 82(2):1489–1537, 2010

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Superfluid- 9 ity of polaritons in semiconductor microcavities.Nature Physics, 5(11):805–810, 2009

    Alberto Amo, J´ erˆ ome Lefr` ere, Simon Pigeon, Claire Adra- dos, Cristiano Ciuti, Iacopo Carusotto, Romuald Houdr´ e, Elisabeth Giacobino, and Alberto Bramati. Superfluid- 9 ity of polaritons in semiconductor microcavities.Nature Physics, 5(11):805–810, 2009

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Room-temperature superflu- idity in a polariton condensate.Nature Physics, 13(9):837– 841, 2017

    Giovanni Lerario, Antonio Fieramosca, F´ abio Barachati, Dario Ballarini, Konstantinos S Daskalakis, Lorenzo Do- minici, Milena De Giorgi, Stefan A Maier, Giuseppe Gigli, St´ ephane K´ ena-Cohen, et al. Room-temperature superflu- idity in a polariton condensate.Nature Physics, 13(9):837– 841, 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Directional goldstone waves in polariton condensates close to equilibrium.Nature communications, 11(1):217, 2020

    Dario Ballarini, Davide Caputo, Galbadrakh Dag- vadorj, Richard Juggins, Milena De Giorgi, Lorenzo Do- minici, Kenneth West, Loren N Pfeiffer, Giuseppe Gigli, Marzena H Szyma´ nska, et al. Directional goldstone waves in polariton condensates close to equilibrium.Nature communications, 11(1):217, 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    P. G. Savvidis, J. J. Baumberg, R. M. Stevenson, M. S. Skolnick, D. M. Whittaker, and J. S. Roberts. Angle- resonant stimulated polariton amplifier.Physical Review Letters, 84(7):1547–1550, 2000

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    Panico, P

    R. Panico, P. Comaron, M. Matuszewski, A. S. Lanotte, D. Trypogeorgos, G. Gigli, M. De Giorgi, V. Ardizzone, D. Sanvitto, and D. Ballarini. Onset of vortex clustering and inverse energy cascade in dissipative quantum fluids. Nature Photonics, 17(5):451–456, May 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V. Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, T. Ozawa, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo. Lasing in topological edge states of a one-dimensional lattice. Nature Photonics, 11(10):651–656, October 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Ardizzone, F

    V. Ardizzone, F. Riminucci, S. Zanotti, A. Gianfrate, M. Efthymiou-Tsironi, D. G. Su` arez-Forero, F. Todisco, M. De Giorgi, D. Trypogeorgos, G. Gigli, K. Baldwin, L. Pfeiffer, D. Ballarini, H. S. Nguyen, D. Gerace, and D. Sanvitto. Polariton Bose–Einstein condensate from a bound state in the continuum.Nature, 605(7910):447–452, May 2022

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    P. M. Walker, L. Tinkler, D. V. Skryabin, A. Yulin, B. Royall, I. Farrer, D. A. Ritchie, M. S. Skolnick, and D. N. Krizhanovskii. Ultra-low-power hybrid light–matter solitons.Nature Communications, 6(1):8317, September 2015

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Elshaari, Wolfram Pernice, Kartik Srinivasan, Oliver Benson, and Val Zwiller

    Ali W. Elshaari, Wolfram Pernice, Kartik Srinivasan, Oliver Benson, and Val Zwiller. Hybrid integrated quan- tum photonic circuits.Nature Photonics, 14(5):285–298, May 2020

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Taewon Park, Hubert Stokowski, Vahid Ansari, Samuel Gyger, Kevin K. S. Multani, Oguz Tolga Celik, Alexan- der Y. Hwang, Devin J. Dean, Felix Mayor, Timothy P. McKenna, Martin M. Fejer, and Amir Safavi-Naeini. Single-mode squeezed-light generation and tomography with an integrated optical parametric oscillator.Science Advances, 10(11):eadl1814, March 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Slow and fast light: fundamentals and applications.Journal of Modern Optics, 56(18-19):1908– 1915, 2009

    Robert W Boyd. Slow and fast light: fundamentals and applications.Journal of Modern Optics, 56(18-19):1908– 1915, 2009

    work page 1908

  17. [17]

    Rosenberg, D

    I. Rosenberg, D. Liran, Y. Mazuz-Harpaz, K. West, L. Pfeiffer, and R. Rapaport. Strongly interacting dipolar- polaritons.Science Advances, 4(9):eaat8880, 2018

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Su´ arez-Forero, F

    D.G. Su´ arez-Forero, F. Riminucci, V. Ardizzone, N. Kar- powicz, E. Maggiolini, G. Macorini, G. Lerario, F. Todisco, M. De Giorgi, L. Dominici, D. Ballarini, G. Gigli, A.S. Lanotte, K. West, K. Baldwin, L. Pfeiffer, and D. San- vitto. Enhancement of Parametric Effects in Polariton Waveguides Induced by Dipolar Interactions.Physical Review Letters, 126(13...

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Electrically controlled photonic circuits of field-induced dipolaritons with huge nonlinearities.Physical Review X, 14(3):031022, 2024

    Dror Liran, Ronen Rapaport, Jiaqi Hu, Nathanial Lydick, Hui Deng, and Loren Pfeiffer. Electrically controlled photonic circuits of field-induced dipolaritons with huge nonlinearities.Physical Review X, 14(3):031022, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    To- wards polariton blockade of confined exciton–polaritons

    Aymeric Delteil, Thomas Fink, Anne Schade, Sven H¨ ofling, Christian Schneider, and Ata¸ c˙Imamo˘ glu. To- wards polariton blockade of confined exciton–polaritons. Nature materials, 18(3):219–222, 2019

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Baragiola, Andreas Rein- hard, Aristide Lemaˆ ıtre, Jacqueline Bloch, Alberto Amo, Gilles Nogues, Benjamin Besga, Maxime Richard, and Thomas Volz

    Guillermo Mu˜ noz-Matutano, Andrew Wood, Mattias Johnsson, Xavier Vidal, Ben Q. Baragiola, Andreas Rein- hard, Aristide Lemaˆ ıtre, Jacqueline Bloch, Alberto Amo, Gilles Nogues, Benjamin Besga, Maxime Richard, and Thomas Volz. Emergence of quantum correlations from interacting fibre-cavity polaritons.Nature Materials, 18(3):213–218, March 2019

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Baldwin, Loren Pfeiffer, Hui Deng, and Ronen Rapaport

    Yoad Ordan, Dror Liran, Kirk W. Baldwin, Loren Pfeiffer, Hui Deng, and Ronen Rapaport. Electri- cally tunable quantum correlations of dipolar polaritons with micrometer-scale blockade radii, November 2024. arXiv:2411.12059 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Optimizing Quantum Photonic Integrated Circuits using Differentiable Tensor Networks

    Mathias Van Regemortel and Thomas Van Vaeren- bergh. Optimizing quantum photonic integrated cir- cuits using differentiable tensor networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11861, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Slow light in photonic crystals.Nature photonics, 2(8):465–473, 2008

    Toshihiko Baba. Slow light in photonic crystals.Nature photonics, 2(8):465–473, 2008

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Strongly nonlinear slow light polaritons in subwavelength modulated waveguides.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.29776, 2026

    Amir Rahmani, Maciej Dems, and Micha l Matuszewski. Strongly nonlinear slow light polaritons in subwavelength modulated waveguides.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.29776, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    P. M. Walker, L. Tinkler, M. Durska, D. M. Whittaker, I. J. Luxmoore, B. Royall, D. N. Krizhanovskii, M. S. Skolnick, I. Farrer, and D. A. Ritchie. Exciton polaritons in semiconductor waveguides.Applied Physics Letters, 102(1):012109, January 2013

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Walker, Charles E

    Paul M. Walker, Charles E. Whittaker, Dmitry V. Skryabin, Emiliano Cancellieri, Ben Royall, Maksym Sich, Ian Farrer, David A. Ritchie, Maurice S. Skolnick, and Dmitry N. Krizhanovskii. Spatiotemporal continuum generation in polariton waveguides.Light: Science & Applications, 8(1):6, January 2019

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Deter- ministic entangling gates with nonlinear quantum pho- tonic interferometers.Communications Physics, 7(1):118, April 2024

    Francesco Scala, Davide Nigro, and Dario Gerace. Deter- ministic entangling gates with nonlinear quantum pho- tonic interferometers.Communications Physics, 7(1):118, April 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Excitonic oscillator-strength satura- tion dominates polariton-polariton interactions.Physical Review Research, 8(1):L012039, 2026

    Maxime Richard, Ir´ en´ ee Fr´ erot, Sylvain Ravets, Jacque- line Bloch, Carlos Anton-Solanas, Ferdinand Claude, Yueguang Zhou, Martina Morassi, Aristide Lemaˆ ıtre, Ia- copo Carusotto, et al. Excitonic oscillator-strength satura- tion dominates polariton-polariton interactions.Physical Review Research, 8(1):L012039, 2026

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Quantum capacity and codes for the bosonic loss- dephasing channel.Quantum, 6:821, 2022

    Peter Leviant, Qian Xu, Liang Jiang, and Serge Rosen- blum. Quantum capacity and codes for the bosonic loss- dephasing channel.Quantum, 6:821, 2022

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Ardizzone, Vincenzo

    et al. Ardizzone, Vincenzo. Few-photon cross-phase mod- ulation in polaritonic waveguides.in preparation

    work page

  32. [32]

    Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quan- tum spin systems.Advances in physics, 57(2):143–224, 2008

    Frank Verstraete, Valentin Murg, and J Ignacio Cirac. Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quan- tum spin systems.Advances in physics, 57(2):143–224, 2008

    work page 2008

  33. [33]

    Enabling large-depth simulation of noisy quantum cir- 10 cuits with positive tensor networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00152, 2024

    Ambroise M¨ uller, Thomas Ayral, and Corentin Bertrand. Enabling large-depth simulation of noisy quantum cir- 10 cuits with positive tensor networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.00152, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Simulat- ing noisy quantum circuits with matrix product density operators.Physical review research, 3(2):023005, 2021

    Song Cheng, Chenfeng Cao, Chao Zhang, Yongxiang Liu, Shi-Yao Hou, Pengxiang Xu, and Bei Zeng. Simulat- ing noisy quantum circuits with matrix product density operators.Physical review research, 3(2):023005, 2021

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library

    Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Van Rege- mortel

    Hewlett Packard Enterprise, developed by M. Van Rege- mortel. Tensor Circuit Torch: MPDO Circuit Implemen- tation, 2026. Branch: MPDO-dev, to be updated

    work page 2026

  37. [37]

    Single photons from coupled quantum modes.Physical review letters, 104(18):183601, 2010

    Timothy CH Liew and Vincenzo Savona. Single photons from coupled quantum modes.Physical review letters, 104(18):183601, 2010

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly nonlinear photonic molecules.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 83(2):021802, 2011

    Motoaki Bamba, Atac Imamo˘ glu, Iacopo Carusotto, and Cristiano Ciuti. Origin of strong photon antibunching in weakly nonlinear photonic molecules.Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 83(2):021802, 2011

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Flayac and V

    H. Flayac and V. Savona. Unconventional photon block- ade.Phys. Rev. A, 96:053810, Nov 2017

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Observation of the unconventional photon blockade in the microwave domain.Physical review letters, 121(4):043602, 2018

    Cyril Vaneph, Alexis Morvan, Gianluca Aiello, Mathieu F´ echant, Marco Aprili, Julien Gabelli, and J´ erˆ ome Est` eve. Observation of the unconventional photon blockade in the microwave domain.Physical review letters, 121(4):043602, 2018

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Antibunching and unconventional photon block- ade with gaussian squeezed states.Physical Review A, 90(6):063824, 2014

    Marc-Antoine Lemonde, Nicolas Didier, and Aashish A Clerk. Antibunching and unconventional photon block- ade with gaussian squeezed states.Physical Review A, 90(6):063824, 2014

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Engineering gaussian states of light from a planar microcavity.SciPost Physics, 5(1):013, 2018

    Mathias Van Regemortel, Sylvain Ravets, Atac Imamoglu, Iacopo Carusotto, and Michiel Wouters. Engineering gaussian states of light from a planar microcavity.SciPost Physics, 5(1):013, 2018

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Lasing in localized modes of a slow light photonic crystal waveguide.Applied Physics Letters, 98(24), 2011

    Jin-Kyu Yang, Heeso Noh, Michael J Rooks, Glenn S Solomon, Frank Vollmer, and Hui Cao. Lasing in localized modes of a slow light photonic crystal waveguide.Applied Physics Letters, 98(24), 2011

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    The nonlinear coherent coupler.IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 18(10):1580–1583, 1982

    Stephen Jensen. The nonlinear coherent coupler.IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, 18(10):1580–1583, 1982

    work page 1982

  45. [45]

    Quantum neuromorphic platform for quantum state prepa- ration.Physical review letters, 123(26):260404, 2019

    Sanjib Ghosh, Tomasz Paterek, and Timothy CH Liew. Quantum neuromorphic platform for quantum state prepa- ration.Physical review letters, 123(26):260404, 2019

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Reconstructing quantum states with quantum reservoir networks.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(7):3148–3155, 2020

    Sanjib Ghosh, Andrzej Opala, Micha l Matuszewski, Tomasz Paterek, and Timothy CH Liew. Reconstructing quantum states with quantum reservoir networks.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(7):3148–3155, 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Photonic quantum metrology with variational quantum optical nonlinearities.Physical Review Research, 6(1):013299, 2024

    A Mu˜ noz de las Heras, Cristian Tabares, Jan T Schneider, Luca Tagliacozzo, Diego Porras, and Alejandro Gonz´ alez- Tudela. Photonic quantum metrology with variational quantum optical nonlinearities.Physical Review Research, 6(1):013299, 2024

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Flayac and V

    H. Flayac and V. Savona. Unconventional photon block- ade.Physical Review A, 96(5):053810, November 2017

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Chapman and hall London, 1983

    Allan W Snyder, John D Love, et al.Optical waveguide theory, volume 175. Chapman and hall London, 1983. 11 Appendix A: Derivation of the circuit gate parameters The tensors corresponding to the circuit gates are con- structed from the two-mode Hamiltonian, defined on reso- nance with the LP mode. It includes the symmetric mode coupling rate J and the nonl...

    work page 1983