pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23624 · v1 · pith:MFHHNQGSnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Close correlation between giant magnetostriction and the microstructure in Fe-Ga melt-spun ribbons

Likun Chen , Mitsutaka Sato , Jiahao Han , Rie Y. Umetsu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 03:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Fe-Ga alloysgiant magnetostrictionmelt-spun ribbonsrare-earth dopingcrystallographic texturemagnetoelastic anisotropymicrostructure control
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rare-earth doping and rapid cooling in Fe-Ga melt-spun ribbons produce magnetostriction up to 688 ppm via <100> texture.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines melt-spun Fe-Ga ribbons as a route to high magnetostriction without single crystals by adding small amounts of rare-earth elements and adjusting the cooling rate during fabrication. Rare-earth atoms dissolve into the matrix to raise magnetoelastic anisotropy while faster cooling promotes a preferred <100> crystallographic orientation and reduces unwanted second phases. The work reports a peak value of 688 ppm in a 1 at.% Ce-doped ribbon made at 1000 rpm and shows that higher rare-earth content lowers the optimum cooling rate because it also lowers the alloy melting point. A reader would care because the approach offers a scalable processing method that links specific microstructural features directly to the measured strain response.

Core claim

Fabrication of Fe81Ga19 ribbons with 0.2-1 at.% Pr or Ce additions at varying wheel speeds shows that rare-earth substitution increases magnetocrystalline distortion energy while cooling rate acts as the main control for developing <100> texture; the 1 at.% Ce ribbon at 1000 rpm reaches 688 ppm magnetostriction, establishing a processing-texture-property relation for polycrystalline giant-magnetostriction alloys.

What carries the argument

<100> texture together with rare-earth-enhanced magnetoelastic anisotropy, which aligns easy axes and raises distortion energy to produce large field-induced strain in the polycrystalline ribbons.

If this is right

  • Rare-earth addition raises magnetostriction by increasing magnetocrystalline distortion energy.
  • Higher cooling rates suppress second-phase particles and strengthen the <100> texture.
  • One atomic percent rare-earth doping lowers the melting temperature and therefore moves the best texture to slower cooling speeds.
  • The resulting ribbons offer a practical guideline for producing highly magnetostrictive materials by melt-spinning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same melt-spinning route might be tested on other Fe-based alloys to obtain useful texture without single-crystal growth.
  • Post-fabrication annealing could be examined to see whether it further improves the <100> alignment already set by the cooling rate.
  • Direct comparison of magnetostriction measured parallel and perpendicular to the ribbon plane would test whether the reported anisotropy is the dominant contributor.

Load-bearing premise

The reported magnetostriction numbers come primarily from the claimed texture and rare-earth effects rather than from differences in how the ribbons were measured or prepared.

What would settle it

Independent preparation and measurement of 1 at.% Ce ribbons spun at 1000 rpm that repeatedly fail to exceed 300 ppm magnetostriction under standard conditions would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

Magnetoelastic anisotropy and <100> texture are crucial for promoting magnetostriction in Galfenol (Fe-Ga). Given that single-crystal Fe-Ga remains technically demanding and low magnetostriction of polycrystal, we explore melt-spun as an alternative, where rare-earth (RE) doping and cooling rates optimizing enable controllable <100> textured with required magnetoelastic anisotropy. Fe81Ga19 binary ribbons and RE-doped ribbons (0.2 at.% Pr, 1 at.% Pr and 1 at.% Ce) were fabricated at various cooling rates. Microstructural analyses reveal that RE elements preferentially dissolve into the matrix, while second-phase formation is suppressed at higher cooling rates. RE substitution increases the magnetostriction by enhancing magnetocrystalline distortion energy, while cooling rates act as an effective tuning knob to maximize the <100> texture. Notably, the decreased melting temperature associated with 1 at.% RE doping shifts the optimum texture to lower cooling rate compared with the binary alloy and 0.2 at.% RE doping sample. The magnetostriction as high as 688 ppm is achieved for the 1 at.% Ce doped ribbon fabricated at the speed of 1000 rotation per minute. These results demonstrate that RE-doped melt-spun ribbons are promising candidates for giant magnetostriction and establish a practical processing-texture-property guideline for designing highly magnetostrictive alloys.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper explores melt-spun Fe-Ga ribbons (binary Fe81Ga19 and doped with 0.2–1 at.% Pr or Ce) fabricated at varying cooling rates (rotation speeds). It reports that RE doping enhances magnetoelastic anisotropy while cooling rate controls <100> texture, with the optimum shifting to lower speeds for 1 at.% RE due to lowered melting point. The central claim is a peak magnetostriction of 688 ppm in the 1 at.% Ce ribbon at 1000 rpm, presented as arising from the optimized texture and RE effects, with microstructural data (phase dissolution, second-phase suppression) supporting the processing–texture–property relations.

Significance. If the 688 ppm value and its attribution hold under scrutiny, the work supplies a practical, scalable route to giant magnetostriction in polycrystalline Fe-Ga without single-crystal growth, together with explicit processing guidelines (RE level and rpm) that could be adopted by other groups. The experimental demonstration of texture optimization via cooling rate and RE-induced anisotropy is a concrete advance for magnetoelastic materials.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section: the headline value of 688 ppm is stated without any accompanying measurement protocol, applied-field range, sample geometry/orientation, strain-gauge details, or error bars. Because this numerical result is the load-bearing claim, the absence of these details prevents assessment of whether the reported magnetostriction truly exceeds prior polycrystalline values or arises from the stated microstructural factors.
  2. [Results / microstructural analysis] Results / microstructural analysis: the attribution of the magnetostriction increase specifically to <100> texture plus RE magnetoelastic anisotropy rests on qualitative texture descriptions and phase observations, but no quantitative texture coefficients (e.g., Lotgering factor or ODF data) or direct correlation plots between measured texture strength and magnetostriction across the rpm series are supplied. This weakens the causal link asserted in the abstract.
  3. [Discussion] Discussion: the claim that 1 at.% RE doping shifts the optimum texture to lower cooling rates is presented as a consequence of reduced melting temperature, yet no supporting DSC or melting-point data are referenced, leaving the mechanistic explanation unsupported by direct evidence.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figures / Results] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the number of independent ribbons measured and the standard deviation for each magnetostriction datum.
  2. [Abstract / Methods] Notation for rotation speed (rpm vs. m/s) is used inconsistently between abstract and methods; standardize to a single unit.
  3. [Discussion] A brief comparison table of the present 688 ppm value against literature polycrystalline and single-crystal Fe-Ga magnetostriction values would help readers gauge the advance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript where the concerns are valid.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section: the headline value of 688 ppm is stated without any accompanying measurement protocol, applied-field range, sample geometry/orientation, strain-gauge details, or error bars. Because this numerical result is the load-bearing claim, the absence of these details prevents assessment of whether the reported magnetostriction truly exceeds prior polycrystalline values or arises from the stated microstructural factors.

    Authors: We agree the measurement protocol must be explicit. The 688 ppm value was obtained via strain-gauge measurements on ribbon samples with the gauge aligned to the ribbon length under fields up to 1.5 T; error bars reflect repeated measurements. We will expand the Methods section and add a paragraph in Results detailing the protocol, geometry, field range, and uncertainties. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / microstructural analysis] Results / microstructural analysis: the attribution of the magnetostriction increase specifically to <100> texture plus RE magnetoelastic anisotropy rests on qualitative texture descriptions and phase observations, but no quantitative texture coefficients (e.g., Lotgering factor or ODF data) or direct correlation plots between measured texture strength and magnetostriction across the rpm series are supplied. This weakens the causal link asserted in the abstract.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the texture analysis is qualitative. We will add Lotgering factors derived from the XRD data and a plot correlating texture strength with magnetostriction across the cooling-rate series to strengthen the causal connection. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Discussion] Discussion: the claim that 1 at.% RE doping shifts the optimum texture to lower cooling rates is presented as a consequence of reduced melting temperature, yet no supporting DSC or melting-point data are referenced, leaving the mechanistic explanation unsupported by direct evidence.

    Authors: The shift in optimum rpm is an experimental observation. The melting-temperature explanation is inferred from known RE effects on Fe-Ga liquidus temperatures. We will revise the text to present this as a plausible mechanism supported by phase-diagram considerations rather than direct measurement, unless DSC data can be added. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

This is a purely experimental materials-science report. The abstract and described content focus on fabrication of melt-spun ribbons, microstructural characterization, texture measurements, and direct magnetostriction values (e.g., 688 ppm for 1 at.% Ce at 1000 rpm). No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains exist that could reduce to inputs by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The result is self-contained experimental data against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental materials study that rests on standard assumptions of the field rather than new postulates or fitted parameters.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetostriction and X-ray texture measurements accurately reflect bulk sample behavior.
    Implicit in reporting the 688 ppm value and texture claims without further qualification.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5795 in / 1235 out tokens · 30166 ms · 2026-05-25T03:46:25.039166+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    XVII. On the effects of magnetism upon the dimensions of iron and steel bars,

    J. P. Joule, “ XVII. On the effects of magnetism upon the dimensions of iron and steel bars,” The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 30, no. 199 (1847): 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786444708645656

    work page doi:10.1080/14786444708645656

  2. [2]

    Rare Earths: A New Interaction,

    A Correspondent, “Rare Earths: A New Interaction,” Nature 240, (1972): 384. https://doi.org/10.1038/240384a0

    work page doi:10.1038/240384a0 1972

  3. [3]

    Smart materials types, properties and applications: A review,

    S. Bahl, H. Nagar, I. Singh, S. Sehgal, “Smart materials types, properties and applications: A review,” Mater Today Proc 28, (2020): 1302–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.505

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.505 2020

  4. [4]

    Calculation of Magnetostriction Constants for Nickel,

    G. C. Fletcher, “Calculation of Magnetostriction Constants for Nickel,” Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A 68, (1955): 1066. https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1298/68/11/315

    work page doi:10.1088/0370-1298/68/11/315 1955

  5. [5]

    Magnetostriction of martensite,

    R. D. James, M. Wuttig, “Magnetostriction of martensite,” Philosophical Magazine A: Physics of Condensed Matter, Structure, Defects and Mechanical Properties 77, no. 5 (1998): 1273–1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619808214252

    work page doi:10.1080/01418619808214252 1998

  6. [6]

    Spin-Mechanical Coupling in 2D Antiferromagnet CrSBr,

    F. Fei, Y . Mao, et al. , “Spin-Mechanical Coupling in 2D Antiferromagnet CrSBr,” Nano Letters 24, no. 34 (2024): 10467–10474. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01751

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01751 2024

  7. [7]

    Magnetostriction, piezomagnetism and domain nucleation in a Kagome antiferromagnet,

    Q. Meng, J. Dong, et al., “Magnetostriction, piezomagnetism and domain nucleation in a Kagome antiferromagnet,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 6921. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51268-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51268-y 2024

  8. [8]

    Exchange magnetostriction in two- dimensional antiferromagnets,

    S. Jiang, H. Xie, J. Shan, K. F. Mak, “Exchange magnetostriction in two- dimensional antiferromagnets,” Nature Materials 19, no. 12 (2020): 1295–1299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0712-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-020-0712-x 2020

  9. [9]

    Non- Joulian magnetostriction,

    H. D. Chopra, M. Wuttig, “Non- Joulian magnetostriction,” Nature 521, no. 7552 (2015): 340–343. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14459

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14459 2015

  10. [10]

    Thermal-capillary analysis of the horizontal ribbon growth of silicon crystals,

    P. Daggolu, A. Yeckel, C. E. Bleil, J. J. Derby, “Thermal-capillary analysis of the horizontal ribbon growth of silicon crystals,” Journal of Crystal Growth 355, no. 1 (2012): 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.06.055

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2012.06.055 2012

  11. [11]

    Magnetostrictive alloys: Promising materials for biomedical applications,

    C. Gao, Z. Zeng, S. Peng, C. Shuai, “Magnetostrictive alloys: Promising materials for biomedical applications,” Bioactive Materials 8, (2022): 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.025 2022

  12. [12]

    Electret integrated magnetic field sensor based on magnetostrictive polymer composite with nT resolution,

    L. Zimoch, et al. , “Electret integrated magnetic field sensor based on magnetostrictive polymer composite with nT resolution,” Scientific Reports 15, no. 1 (2025): 1561. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-85069-6 12

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-85069-6 2025

  13. [13]

    Effects of Ga on the microstructure and magnetostriction of Fe-Ga alloys for actuators,

    V . Vijayanarayanan, H. Basumatary, et al. , “Effects of Ga on the microstructure and magnetostriction of Fe-Ga alloys for actuators,” Materials Today: Proceedings 59, (2022): 216– 219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.091

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.091 2022

  14. [14]

    Twinning in multicrystalline silicon for solar cells,

    G. Stokkan, “Twinning in multicrystalline silicon for solar cells,” Journal of Crystal Growth 384, (2013): 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.09.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.09.008 2013

  15. [15]

    Fabrication of Fe- Co magnetostrictive fiber reinforced plastic composites and their sensor performance evaluation,

    K. Katabira, Y . Yoshida, A. Masuda, A. Watanabe, F. Narita, “Fabrication of Fe- Co magnetostrictive fiber reinforced plastic composites and their sensor performance evaluation,” Materials 11, no. 3 (2018): 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11030406

    work page doi:10.3390/ma11030406 2018

  16. [16]

    Additive manufacturing and energy-harvesting performance of honeycomb- structured magnetostrictive Fe 52–Co48 alloys,

    H. Kurita, P. Lohmuller, P. Laheurte, et al., “Additive manufacturing and energy-harvesting performance of honeycomb- structured magnetostrictive Fe 52–Co48 alloys,” Additive Manufacturing 54, (2022): 102741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102741

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.102741 2022

  17. [17]

    Giant magnetoelastic effect in soft systems for bioelectronics,

    Y . Zhou, X. Zhao, et al., “Giant magnetoelastic effect in soft systems for bioelectronics,” Nature Materials 20, no. 12 (2021): 1670–1676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01093-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-021-01093-1 2021

  18. [18]

    Structural, magnetic, and frequency domain ferromagnetic resonance studies of Fe82Ga18/Al2O3(001) films lightly doped with Cu and Ag,

    A. Ahmad, B. Arun, J. Arout Chelvane, K. C. James Raju, “Structural, magnetic, and frequency domain ferromagnetic resonance studies of Fe82Ga18/Al2O3(001) films lightly doped with Cu and Ag,” Journal of Applied Physics 137, no. 15 (2025): 153903. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0260810

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0260810 2025

  19. [19]

    Multitarget sputtering of high magnetostrictive Tb -Dy-Fe films,

    E. Quandt, “Multitarget sputtering of high magnetostrictive Tb -Dy-Fe films,” Journal of Applied Physics 75, no. 10 (1994): 5653–5655. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.355626

    work page doi:10.1063/1.355626 1994

  20. [20]

    Ion Irradiation Effects on Magnetostriction of Tb-Fe Thin Film,

    T. Shimizu, K. Ishida, Y . Matsumura, H. Uchida, M. Ono, A. Tonegawa, “Ion Irradiation Effects on Magnetostriction of Tb-Fe Thin Film,” Surface and Coatings Technology 169-170, (2003): 616-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00126-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0257-8972(03)00126-9 2003

  21. [21]

    Effect of cooling rate on crystal orientation, and magnetic and magnetostrictive properties of TbFe 2-based alloy treated in semisolid state under a high magnetic field,

    P. F. Gao, Q. Wang, T. Liu, Y . Liu, S. X. Niu, J. C. He, “Effect of cooling rate on crystal orientation, and magnetic and magnetostrictive properties of TbFe 2-based alloy treated in semisolid state under a high magnetic field,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 51, no. 5 (2015): 114904. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2014.2366728

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2014.2366728 2015

  22. [22]

    Magnetostrictive properties of body -centered cubic Fe- Ga and Fe -Ga-Al alloys,

    A. E. Clark, J. B. Restorff, M. Wun- Fogle, T. A. Lograsso, D. L. Schlagel, “Magnetostrictive properties of body -centered cubic Fe- Ga and Fe -Ga-Al alloys,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 36, no. 5 (2000): 3238–3240. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.908752

    work page doi:10.1109/20.908752 2000

  23. [23]

    Extraordinary magnetoelasticity and lattice softening in 13 bcc Fe-Ga alloy,

    A. E. Clark, K. B. Hathaway, et al., “Extraordinary magnetoelasticity and lattice softening in 13 bcc Fe-Ga alloy,” Journal of Applied Physics 93, no. 10 (2003): 8621–8623. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1540130

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1540130 2003

  24. [24]

    Disordering in Fe3Ga alloy of D0 3 structure: Effect on stability and magnetostriction,

    T. Inerbaev, A. Abuova, A. Dauletbekova, Y . Kawazoe, R. Umetsu, “Disordering in Fe3Ga alloy of D0 3 structure: Effect on stability and magnetostriction,” Computational Materials Science 216, (2023): 111878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111878

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111878 2023

  25. [25]

    Anisotropy of magnetostriction of functional BCC iron- based alloys,

    S. Suzuki, T. Kawamata, R. Simura, S. Asano, S. Fujieda, R. Y . Umetsu, et al., “Anisotropy of magnetostriction of functional BCC iron- based alloys,” Materials Transactions 60, no. 11 (2019): 2235–2244. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.MT-M2019146

    work page doi:10.2320/matertrans.mt-m2019146 2019

  26. [26]

    Structural mechanisms of anelasticity in Fe -Ga-based alloys,

    I. S. Golovin, J. Cifre, “Structural mechanisms of anelasticity in Fe -Ga-based alloys,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 584, (2014): 322–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.077

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.077 2014

  27. [27]

    Strong, ductile, and low -field- magnetostrictive alloys based on Fe- Ga,

    S. Guruswamy, N Srisukhumbowornchai, et al., “Strong, ductile, and low -field- magnetostrictive alloys based on Fe- Ga,” Scripta Materialia 43, no. 3 (2000): 239- 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00397-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6462(00)00397-3 2000

  28. [28]

    Origin of large magnetostriction in FeGa alloys,

    R. Wu, “Origin of large magnetostriction in FeGa alloys,” Journal of Applied Physics 91, no. 10 (2002): 7358–7360. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1450791

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1450791 2002

  29. [29]

    Nanoheterogeneity response in large - magnetostriction Fe-Ga alloys: An in-situ magnetic small-angle neutron scattering study,

    C. Zhang, J. Gou, J. Yang, T. Ma, et al. , “Nanoheterogeneity response in large - magnetostriction Fe-Ga alloys: An in-situ magnetic small-angle neutron scattering study,” Acta Materialia 225, (2022): 117594 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117594

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117594 2022

  30. [30]

    Micro-magnetostrictive vibrator using iron-gallium alloy,

    T. Ueno, E. Summers, M. Wun-Fogle, T. Higuchi, “Micro-magnetostrictive vibrator using iron-gallium alloy,” Sensors and Actuators, A: Physical 148, no. 1 (2008): 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2008.08.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sna.2008.08.017 2008

  31. [31]

    Magnetotransport properties of Fe0.8Ga0.2 films with stripe domains,

    M. Granada, S. Bustingorry, D. E. Pontello, et al. , “Magnetotransport properties of Fe0.8Ga0.2 films with stripe domains,” Physical Review B 94, no. 18 (2016): 184435 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.184435

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.94.184435 2016

  32. [32]

    A review of magnetostrictive iron- gallium alloys,

    J. Atulasimha, A. B. Flatau, “A review of magnetostrictive iron- gallium alloys,” Smart Materials and Structures 20, no. 4 (2011): 043001 https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/4/043001

    work page doi:10.1088/0964-1726/20/4/043001 2011

  33. [33]

    Effect of cerium on structure and texture formation of Fe-Ga alloy during cold rolling and primary recrystallization,

    V . A. Milyutin, I. V . Gervasyeva, A. A. Kalonov, D. I. Devyaterikov, “Effect of cerium on structure and texture formation of Fe-Ga alloy during cold rolling and primary recrystallization,” Materials Today Communications 49, (2025): 114035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.114035

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.114035 2025

  34. [34]

    Influence of Ga content and high temperature annealing on the short range order and magnetostriction of Fe-Ga single crystals,

    R. A. Laroche, S. Guruswamy, “Influence of Ga content and high temperature annealing on the short range order and magnetostriction of Fe-Ga single crystals,” Journal of Applied Physics 14 128, no. 19 (2020): 195102 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0029241

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0029241 2020

  35. [35]

    Magnetostriction of Polycrystalline Strong- Textured Fe –17 at%Ga Laminates,

    C. Saito, Y . Furuya, T. Okazaki, M. Omori, “Magnetostriction of Polycrystalline Strong- Textured Fe –17 at%Ga Laminates,” Materials Transactions 46, no. 8 (2005): 1933- 1937. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.46.1933

    work page doi:10.2320/matertrans.46.1933 2005

  36. [36]

    Interaction of Trace Rare -Earth Dopants and Nanoheterogeneities Induces Giant Magnetostriction in Fe -Ga Alloys,

    Y . He, X. Ke, C. Jiang, et al. , “Interaction of Trace Rare -Earth Dopants and Nanoheterogeneities Induces Giant Magnetostriction in Fe -Ga Alloys,” Advanced Functional Materials 28, no. 20 (2018): 1800858 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201800858

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.201800858 2018

  37. [37]

    Ductility, texture and large magnetostriction of Fe-Ga-based sheets,

    J. H. Li, X. X. Gao, J. Zhu, X. Q. Bao, T. Xia, M. C. Zhang, “Ductility, texture and large magnetostriction of Fe-Ga-based sheets,” Scripta Materialia 63, no. 2 (2010): 246–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.068

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.068 2010

  38. [38]

    Magnetostrictive Properties and Microstructure of Fe-Ga alloy and the Doping System,

    L. Chen, Y .- C. Huang, M. Sato, R. Y . Umetsu, “Magnetostrictive Properties and Microstructure of Fe-Ga alloy and the Doping System,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 3161, no. 1 (2026): 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3161/1/012038

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3161/1/012038 2026

  39. [39]

    The magnetostriction of Fe-(18-x) at% Ga-x at% Al (3≤x≤13.5) alloys,

    Y . Zhou, B. W. Wang, et al., “The magnetostriction of Fe-(18-x) at% Ga-x at% Al (3≤x≤13.5) alloys,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 322, no. 15 (2010): 2104–2107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.01.041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.01.041 2010

  40. [40]

    Tetragonal magnetostriction and magnetoelastic coupling in Fe-Al, Fe-Ga, Fe-Ge, Fe-Si, Fe-Ga-Al, and Fe-Ga-Ge alloys,

    J. B. Restorff, M. Wun- Fogle, et al. , “Tetragonal magnetostriction and magnetoelastic coupling in Fe-Al, Fe-Ga, Fe-Ge, Fe-Si, Fe-Ga-Al, and Fe-Ga-Ge alloys,” Journal of Applied Physics 111, (2012): 023905. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3674318

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3674318 2012

  41. [41]

    Multifactorial impacts of B -doping on Fe81Ga19 alloys prepared by laser -beam powder bed fusion: Microstructure, magnetostriction, and osteogenesis,

    C. Gao, L. Wang, Y . Deng, S. Peng, C. Shuai, “Multifactorial impacts of B -doping on Fe81Ga19 alloys prepared by laser -beam powder bed fusion: Microstructure, magnetostriction, and osteogenesis,” Journal of Materials Science and Technology 205, (2025): 14– 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2024.03.063 42 H. Liu, Y . Wang, L. Dong, H. Wang, Y . Zhang, Z...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmst.2024.03.063 2025

  42. [42]

    Effects of B- and in-doping on microstructures, magnetostriction and magnetic properties of melt -spun Fe81Ga19 ribbons,

    M. X. Cao, H. Liu, H. O. Wang, Y . Zhang, W. S. Tan, Y . G. Shi, “Effects of B- and in-doping on microstructures, magnetostriction and magnetic properties of melt -spun Fe81Ga19 ribbons,” Wuli Huaxue Xuebao/ Acta Physico - Chimica Sinica 32, no. 7 (2016): 1829–1838. https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201605191

    work page doi:10.3866/pku.whxb201605191 2016

  43. [43]

    Magnetostriction enhancement of Fe73Ga27 alloy by magnetic field annealing,

    X. Li, X. Bao, X. Yu, X. Gao, “Magnetostriction enhancement of Fe73Ga27 alloy by magnetic field annealing,” Scripta Materialia 147, (2018): 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.01.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.01.004 2018

  44. [44]

    Laser -beam powder bed fusion followed by 15 annealing with stress: A promising route for magnetostrictive improvement of polycrystalline Fe81Ga19 alloys,

    C. Gao, X. Yao, Y . Deng, H. Pan, C. Shuai, “Laser -beam powder bed fusion followed by 15 annealing with stress: A promising route for magnetostrictive improvement of polycrystalline Fe81Ga19 alloys,” Additive Manufacturing 68, (2023): 103516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103516

    work page doi:10.1016/j.addma.2023.103516 2023

  45. [45]

    Local ordering and interatomic bonding in magnetostrictive Fe 0.85Ga0.15X (X=Ni,Cu,Co,La) alloy,

    T. M. Inerbaev, A. Abuova, Y . Kawazoe, R. Umetsu, “Local ordering and interatomic bonding in magnetostrictive Fe 0.85Ga0.15X (X=Ni,Cu,Co,La) alloy,” Computational Materials Science 202, (2022): 110934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110934

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110934 2022

  46. [47]

    Giant enhancement in the magnetostrictive effect of FeGa alloys doped with low levels of terbium,

    L. Jiang, J. Yang, H. Hao, G. Zhang, S. Wu, Y . Chen, O. Obi, T. Fitchorov, V . G. Harris, “Giant enhancement in the magnetostrictive effect of FeGa alloys doped with low levels of terbium,” Applied Physics Letters 102, no. 22 (2013): 222409. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4809829

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4809829 2013

  47. [48]

    Flexible Pr -Doped Fe–Ga Composite Materials: Preparation, Microstructure, and Magnetostrictive Properties,

    X. Zhao, X. Tian, Z. Yao, L. Zhao, R. Wang, J. Yan, X. Liu, “Flexible Pr -Doped Fe–Ga Composite Materials: Preparation, Microstructure, and Magnetostrictive Properties,” Advanced Engineering Materials 22, no. 12 (2020): 2000080. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202000080

    work page doi:10.1002/adem.202000080 2020

  48. [49]

    Effects of Ce addition on the microstructure and magnetostriction of Fe 83Ga17 alloy,

    Z. Yao, Z. Zhao, L. Jiang, H. Hao, S. Wu, G. Zhang, J. Yang, “Effects of Ce addition on the microstructure and magnetostriction of Fe 83Ga17 alloy,” Jinshu Xuebao/Acta Metallurgica Sinica 49, no. 1 (2013): 87–91. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1037.2012.00498 51 X. lei Wang, Y . Liu, X. Chen, H. wei Zhang, Y . xiang Li, “Effect of Dy doping on magnetostrict...

    work page doi:10.3724/sp.j.1037.2012.00498 2013

  49. [50]

    Improved magnetostriction of Fe 83Ga17 ribbons doped with Sm,

    W. Wu, C. Jiang, “Improved magnetostriction of Fe 83Ga17 ribbons doped with Sm,” Rare Metals 36, no. 1 (2017): 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-016-0758-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s12598-016-0758-8 2017

  50. [51]

    Giant heterogeneous magnetostriction in Fe -Ga alloys: Effect of trace element doping,

    Y . He, C. Jiang, W. Wu, B. Wang, H. Duan, H. Wang, T. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, P. Stamenov, J. M. D. Coey, H. Xu, “Giant heterogeneous magnetostriction in Fe -Ga alloys: Effect of trace element doping,” Acta Materialia 109, (2016): 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.056

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.056 2016

  51. [52]

    Enhanced magnetostrictive properties of lightly Pr-doped Fe83Ga17 alloys,

    L. Zhao, X. Tian, Z. Yao, X. Zhao, R. Wang, H. O, L. Jiang, V . G. Harris, “Enhanced magnetostrictive properties of lightly Pr-doped Fe83Ga17 alloys,” Journal of Rare Earths 38, 16 no. 3 (2020): 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2019.05.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jre.2019.05.005 2020

  52. [53]

    The origin of large magnetostrictive properties of rare earth doped Fe-Ga as-cast alloys,

    X. Zhao, X. Tian, Z. Yao, R. Wang, J. Yan, X. Liu, H. Hao, “The origin of large magnetostrictive properties of rare earth doped Fe-Ga as-cast alloys,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 514, (2020): 167289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167289

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167289 2020

  53. [54]

    Enhanced magnetostriction of polycrystalline Fe-Ga alloy by trace Pr doping,

    H. Yu, T. Yao, J. Liu, Z. He, H. Hao, S. Wang, X. Zhang, S. Zhang, Y . Sha, X. Zhu, L. Chen, “Enhanced magnetostriction of polycrystalline Fe-Ga alloy by trace Pr doping,” Intermetallics 189, (2026): 109138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2025.109138

    work page doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2025.109138 2026

  54. [55]

    Giant magnetostriction on Fe85Ga15 stacked ribbon samples,

    G. D. Liu, L. B. Liu, Z. H. Liu, M. Zhang, J. L. Chen, J. Q. Li, G. H. Wu, Y . X. Li, J. P. Qu, T. S. Chin, “Giant magnetostriction on Fe85Ga15 stacked ribbon samples,” Applied Physics Letters 84, no. 12 (2004): 2124–2126. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1688452. 59 J. Zhu, F. L. Peng, M. L. Fang, J. H. Li, X. X. Gao, R. H. Yu, “Short range order transformation...

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1688452 2004

  55. [56]

    Microstructure and Magnetostriction of Rapid- Solidified Fe-15 at%Ga Alloy,

    C. Saito, Y . Furuya, T. Okazaki, T. Matsuzaki, T. Watanabe, “Microstructure and Magnetostriction of Rapid- Solidified Fe-15 at%Ga Alloy,” Materials Transactions 45, no. 20 (2004): 193-198. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.45.193

    work page doi:10.2320/matertrans.45.193 2004

  56. [57]

    Magnetostriction and microstructure of the melt -spun Fe83Ga17 alloy,

    M. C. Zhang, H. L. Jiang, X. X. Gao, J. Zhu, S. Z. Zhou, “Magnetostriction and microstructure of the melt -spun Fe83Ga17 alloy,” Journal of Applied Physics 99, no. 2 (2006): 023903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2164528

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2164528 2006

  57. [58]

    Magnetostriction and microstructure of melt -spun Fe77Ga23 ribbons prepared with different wheel velocities,

    H. Liu, H. O. Wang, et al., “Magnetostriction and microstructure of melt -spun Fe77Ga23 ribbons prepared with different wheel velocities,” Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China (English Edition) 25, no. 1 (2015): 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63586-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s1003-6326(15)63586-5 2015

  58. [59]

    Local structure in magnetostrictive melt -spun Fe 80Ga20 alloys,

    S. Pascarelli, M. P. Ruffoni, R. Sato Turtelli, F. Kubel, R. Grössinger, “Local structure in magnetostrictive melt -spun Fe 80Ga20 alloys,” Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 77, no. 18 (2008): 184406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.184406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.184406 2008

  59. [60]

    Large Magnetostriction in Fe-Ga Rapid Solidified Alloy,

    Y . Furuya, C. Saito, T. Okazaki, “Large Magnetostriction in Fe-Ga Rapid Solidified Alloy,” Japan Institute of Metals 66, no. 9 (2002): 901-904. https://doi.org/10.2320/jinstmet1952.66.9_901

    work page doi:10.2320/jinstmet1952.66.9_901 2002

  60. [61]

    Giant magnetostriction in rapidly quenched Fe -Ga?,

    R. Grössinger, R. S. Turtelli, et al/, “Giant magnetostriction in rapidly quenched Fe -Ga?,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 320, no. 20 (2008): 2457–2465. 17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.04.044

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.04.044 2008

  61. [62]

    Effect of Ga content on the magnetostriction and microstructure of Fe-Ga ribbons,

    M. C. Zhang, X. X. Gao, H. L. Jiang, Y . Qiao, S. Z. Zhou, “Effect of Ga content on the magnetostriction and microstructure of Fe-Ga ribbons,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 431, no. 1–2 (2007): 42–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.093

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.093 2007

  62. [63]

    Enhanced magnetostriction through dilute Ce doping of Fe - Ga,

    A. A. Baker, A. Amon, et al., “Enhanced magnetostriction through dilute Ce doping of Fe - Ga,” Physical Review Materials 7, no. 1 (2023): 014406 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.014406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.7.014406 2023

  63. [64]

    Exploring structural origin of the enhanced magnetostriction in Tb-doped Fe83Ga17 ribbons: Tuning Tb solubility,

    Y . Han, H. Wang, T. Zhang, Y . He, C. Jiang, “Exploring structural origin of the enhanced magnetostriction in Tb-doped Fe83Ga17 ribbons: Tuning Tb solubility,” Scripta Materialia 150, (2018): 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.010 2018

  64. [65]

    Influences of rare earth element Ce-doping and melt-spinning on microstructure and magnetostriction of Fe83Ga17 alloy,

    Z. Yao, X. Tian, L. Jiang, H. Hao, G. Zhang, S. Wu, Z. Zhao, N. Gerile, “Influences of rare earth element Ce-doping and melt-spinning on microstructure and magnetostriction of Fe83Ga17 alloy,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 637, (2015): 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.009 2015

  65. [66]

    Improved magnetostriction of Dy -doped Fe 83Ga17 melt-spun ribbons,

    T. Jin, W. Wu, C. Jiang, “Improved magnetostriction of Dy -doped Fe 83Ga17 melt-spun ribbons,” Scripta Materialia 74, (2014): 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.11.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.11.010 2014

  66. [67]

    Giant magnetostriction in Tb -doped Fe83Ga17 melt-spun ribbons,

    W. Wu, J. Liu, C. Jiang, H. Xu, “Giant magnetostriction in Tb -doped Fe83Ga17 melt-spun ribbons,” Applied Physics Letters 103, no. 26 (2013): 262403. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4851216

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4851216 2013

  67. [68]

    Giant heterogeneous magnetostriction induced by charge accumulation-mediated nanoinclusion formation in dual -phase nanostructured systems,

    Y . Chen, Z. Fu, et al. , “Giant heterogeneous magnetostriction induced by charge accumulation-mediated nanoinclusion formation in dual -phase nanostructured systems,” Acta Materialia 213, (2021): 116975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116975

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116975 2021

  68. [69]

    Influence of Purity and Cooling -Rate on the Microstructure of Hot-Forged Pure Irons,

    T. Ogawa, N. Harima, S. Takaki, K. Abiko, “Influence of Purity and Cooling -Rate on the Microstructure of Hot-Forged Pure Irons,” Materials Transactions 43, no. 2 (2002): 129-134. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.43.129

    work page doi:10.2320/matertrans.43.129 2002

  69. [70]

    Grain Orientation Competitive Growth of High Melting Point Metals Ir and Mo Under Electron Beam Floating Zone Melting,

    S. Li, B. Wang, Z. Liu, H. Zhong, R. Hu, Y . Liu, X. Luo, “Grain Orientation Competitive Growth of High Melting Point Metals Ir and Mo Under Electron Beam Floating Zone Melting,” Jinshu Xuebao/Acta Metallurgica Sinica 54, no. 10 (2018): 1435–1441. https://doi.org/10.11900/0412.1961.2018.00013

    work page doi:10.11900/0412.1961.2018.00013 2018

  70. [71]

    Ginzburg- Landau theory of the bcc -liquid interface kinetic coefficient,

    K. A. Wu, C. H. Wang, J. J. Hoyt, A. Karma, “Ginzburg- Landau theory of the bcc -liquid interface kinetic coefficient,” Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 91, no. 1 (2015): 014107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.014107

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.014107 2015

  71. [72]

    Kinetic coefficient for hard -sphere crystal growth from the melt,

    M. Amini, B. B. Laird, “Kinetic coefficient for hard -sphere crystal growth from the melt,” Physical Review Letters 97, no. 21 (2006): 216102. 18 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.216102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.216102 2006

  72. [73]

    Phase equilibria and stability of ordered b.c.c. phases in the Fe -rich portion of the Fe –Ga system,

    O Ikeda, R. Kainuma, I. Ohnuma, K. Fukamichi, K. Ishida, “Phase equilibria and stability of ordered b.c.c. phases in the Fe -rich portion of the Fe –Ga system,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 347, no. 1-2 (2002): 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00791-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0925-8388(02)00791-0 2002

  73. [74]

    POWDER CELL– a program for the representation and manipulation of crystal structures and calculation of the resulting X-ray powder patterns,

    W. Kraus, G. Nolze, “POWDER CELL– a program for the representation and manipulation of crystal structures and calculation of the resulting X-ray powder patterns,” Journal of applied crystallography 29, (1996): 301-303. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889895014920

    work page doi:10.1107/s0021889895014920 1996

  74. [75]

    Magnetic properties and Mössabauer investigations of Fe-Ga alloys,

    N. Kawamiya, K. Adachi, Y . Nakamura, “Magnetic properties and Mössabauer investigations of Fe-Ga alloys,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 33, no. 5 (1972): 1318– 1327. https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.33.1318

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.33.1318 1972

  75. [76]

    Magnetostriction measurement by four probe method,

    S. N. Dange, S. Radha, “Magnetostriction measurement by four probe method,” AIP Conference Proceedings 1942, (2018): 060028. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5028798

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5028798 1942

  76. [77]

    An overview of magnetostriction, its use and methods to measure these properties,

    N. B. Ekreem, A. G. Olabi, T. Prescott, A. Rafferty, M. S. J. Hashmi, “An overview of magnetostriction, its use and methods to measure these properties,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 191, no. 1–3 (2007): 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.064

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.064 2007

  77. [78]

    Accurate measurement of the magnetostriction of soft magnetic materials,

    R. Grössinger, H. Sassik, D. Holzer, N. Pillmayr, “ Accurate measurement of the magnetostriction of soft magnetic materials,” Technical Report, Institute of Experimental Physik, TU Vienna (2000)

    work page 2000

  78. [79]

    Morphology evolution and enhanced magnetostriction of (Fe 0.81Ga0.19)99.9Tb0.1 crystals prepared by liquid metal cooling Bridgman directional solidification,

    Y . Chen, J. Wang, B. Yang, J. Liu, C. Jiang, “Morphology evolution and enhanced magnetostriction of (Fe 0.81Ga0.19)99.9Tb0.1 crystals prepared by liquid metal cooling Bridgman directional solidification,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 856, (2021):158166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158166 84 D. Y . Sun, M. Asta, J. J. Hoyt, “Crystal-melt int...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158166 2021

  79. [80]

    D. M. Stefanescu, Science and Engineering of Casting Solidification, 3rd ed., Engineering Materials and Processes (Cham: Springer, 2015), ISBN 9783319156927. Chapter 3, p37-66

    work page 2015

  80. [81]

    I. V . Markov, Crystal Growth for Beginners: Fundamentals of Nucleation, Crystal Growth and Epitaxy (Singapore: World Scientific, 1995), ISBN 9810215312. Chapter 2, p63-145 19 Figure 1 SEM images observed at the free face of Fe81Ga19 ribbon samples fabricated in different rotating speeds of 1 (a), 2 (b), 3 krpm (c) and those of the Ce doped ribbon samples...

    work page 1995