Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 119 references

From Provable to Practical: A Problem-Driven Survey of Classical and Machine-Learning Defenses for DV/CV Quantum Key Distribution

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A problem-driven survey finds ML defenses reach 99.8% recall for CV QKD attacks and proposes unified benchmarks to move from provable security to practical deployment.

desk verdict A solid literature map of QKD defenses with nine problem classes and a proposed benchmarking framework, but the cited ML numbers stay disconnected from the framework's own metrics. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.27497 v1 pith:YXZLFLVP submitted 2026-05-26 quant-ph

Hasan Abbas Al-Mohammed , Afnan S. Al-Ali This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumkeydistributionmachinelearningdefensesdiscrete-variableQKDcontinuous-variableattackdetectionbenchmarkingframeworksecurityvulnerabilitiesnoiseprediction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper organizes QKD vulnerabilities into nine problem classes across device, channel, protocol, ML, and network layers, then compares classical defenses against ML-enabled ones such as anomaly detection and noise prediction. It reports concrete performance figures including DBSCAN-based attack detection at 99.7% precision and 99.8% recall, plus LightGBM noise prediction that cuts evaluation time by up to 98.8%. The central contribution is a proposed benchmarking framework that combines datasets, stress protocols, and metrics like secret key rate impact and robustness, together with defense-in-depth deployment guidelines. A sympathetic reader cares because QKD's information-theoretic promises are undermined by real-world imperfections, and the survey shows how ML tools can address specific gaps while highlighting what still needs standardized evaluation.

What carries the argument

The nine problem classes (P1-P9) that span device, channel, protocol, ML, and network layers and serve as the organizing structure for comparing classical defenses with ML techniques including anomaly detection, parameter prediction, noise estimation, adversarial purification, and resource allocation.

What would settle it

An independent test that applies a vulnerability outside the nine classes to a deployed QKD link and measures a larger drop in secret key rate or distance than any of the surveyed ML or classical defenses can recover.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The survey establishes that ML-enabled solutions achieve high performance on targeted tasks such as DBSCAN-based CV attack detection at P=99.7%, R=99.8%, F1=0.998, adversarial robustness recovery up to 79.5%, channel-amplification detection at 100%/91.26% under low/high-noise conditions, and LightGBM-based noise prediction reducing evaluation time by up to 98.8%, while the nine problem classes (P1-P9) provide a structure for comparing these against classical methods and for introducing a unified benchmarking framework that incorporates SKR impact, maximum distance, latency, and robustness metrics along with defense-in-depth guidelines.

Load-bearing premise

That the nine problem classes comprehensively cover the practical vulnerabilities that matter most for real DV and CV QKD deployments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ML methods can deliver specific performance gains such as 99.8% recall in CV attack detection and 98.8% reduction in noise-prediction time when the reported conditions hold.
  • A unified benchmarking framework allows direct comparison of defenses using shared datasets, stress protocols, and metrics including SKR impact and robustness.
  • Defense-in-depth guidelines can be applied across the nine problem classes to improve practical QKD security.
  • Future work should address the outlined research directions for integrating ML components securely into QKD systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the benchmarking framework is adopted, it could accelerate standardization efforts for QKD defense evaluation across different hardware platforms.
  • High reported ML performance on isolated tasks suggests potential for hybrid classical-ML systems that maintain information-theoretic security proofs while improving adaptability to channel variations.
  • The survey's emphasis on finite-key effects and ML-component vulnerabilities implies that practical QKD networks may require ongoing monitoring rather than one-time certification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper is a problem-driven survey of classical and ML-enabled defenses for discrete-variable (DV) and continuous-variable (CV) quantum key distribution (QKD). It organizes practical vulnerabilities into nine problem classes (P1-P9) spanning device, channel, protocol, ML, and network layers. For each class it compares classical and ML approaches (anomaly detection, parameter prediction, adversarial purification, etc.), citing literature metrics such as DBSCAN CV attack detection (P=99.7%, R=99.8%, F1=0.998), adversarial robustness recovery up to 79.5%, and LightGBM noise prediction reducing evaluation time by 98.8%. The manuscript proposes a unified benchmarking framework with datasets, stress protocols, and metrics (SKR impact, maximum distance, latency, robustness), provides defense-in-depth deployment guidelines, and outlines future directions.

Significance. A well-executed survey that successfully maps the landscape of QKD defenses and introduces a concrete benchmarking framework could help standardize evaluation practices and accelerate the transition from theoretical security proofs to deployable systems. The compilation of ML techniques applied to QKD monitoring and adaptation is timely. However, the significance is limited by the absence of any demonstrated mapping of the cited performance numbers onto the framework's own metrics, leaving the framework's claimed utility unverified within the manuscript.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The headline performance figures (DBSCAN F1=0.998, LightGBM 98.8% time reduction, etc.) are reported verbatim from the source papers. No evidence is provided that these results were re-evaluated or even mapped onto the unified metrics declared central to the benchmarking framework (SKR impact, maximum distance, latency, robustness). Because the manuscript positions the framework as the mechanism that converts isolated ML results into comparable, actionable defenses, this missing linkage is load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction / Problem Classes] The selection criteria and completeness argument for the nine problem classes (P1-P9) are stated but not accompanied by an explicit justification or gap analysis relative to known real-world QKD deployment failures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The single major comment identifies a genuine gap between the proposed benchmarking framework and the cited performance numbers. We respond point-by-point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline performance figures (DBSCAN F1=0.998, LightGBM 98.8% time reduction, etc.) are reported verbatim from the source papers. No evidence is provided that these results were re-evaluated or even mapped onto the unified metrics declared central to the benchmarking framework (SKR impact, maximum distance, latency, robustness). Because the manuscript positions the framework as the mechanism that converts isolated ML results into comparable, actionable defenses, this missing linkage is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the cited figures are taken directly from the source literature without re-implementation or explicit remapping onto the new metrics (SKR impact, maximum distance, latency, robustness). Because the work is a survey, its scope is to classify existing results under the nine problem classes (P1–P9) and to introduce the benchmarking framework as a forward-looking proposal rather than to retroactively apply it. Performing such a mapping would require original code, datasets, and experimental setups from multiple prior papers, which exceeds the remit of a survey. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and framework section to state explicitly that the framework is offered for future standardization and that the reported numbers remain illustrative of the literature rather than benchmarked under the new protocol. This clarification removes the implication that the framework has already been used to unify the cited results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: survey compiles external results without derivations or self-referential predictions

full rationale

This is a survey paper that organizes existing literature on QKD defenses into nine problem classes and reports performance numbers taken verbatim from the cited source papers (e.g., DBSCAN F1=0.998). No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are derived inside the paper itself; the proposed benchmarking framework is an organizational proposal rather than a mathematical reduction. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing steps. The central claims rest on external citations, which the instructions treat as independent when they are not internally fitted or redefined.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

As a survey the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; its contribution is organizational compilation of existing research.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Provable to Practical: A Problem-Driven Survey of Classical and Machine-Learning Defenses for DV/CV Quantum Key Distribution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YXZLFLVP

@misc{pith2026260527497,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Provable to Practical: A Problem-Driven Survey of Classical and Machine-Learning Defenses for DV/CV Quantum Key Distribution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YXZLFLVP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.27497}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum key distribution (QKD) promises information-theoretic security, yet practical deployments in discrete-variable (DV) and continuous-variable (CV) settings remain exposed to device imperfections, channel manipulation, finite-key effects, and vulnerabilities in machine-learning (ML) components used for adaptation and monitoring. This survey adopts a problem-driven perspective based on nine practical problem classes (P1-P9) spanning device, channel, protocol, ML, and network layers. For each class, we compare classical defenses with ML-enabled solutions including anomaly detection, parameter prediction, noise estimation, adversarial purification, and resource allocation. Reported results include DBSCAN-based CV attack detection at P=99.7%, R=99.8%, F1=0.998, adversarial robustness recovery up to 79.5%, channel-amplification detection at 100%/91.26% under low/high-noise conditions, and LightGBM-based noise prediction reducing evaluation time by up to 98.8%. The survey further proposes a benchmarking framework combining datasets, stress protocols, and unified evaluation metrics including SKR impact, maximum distance, latency, and robustness. Finally, we provide defense-in-depth deployment guidelines and outline future research directions for secure and practical QKD systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27497 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. QKD modalities and trust assumptions. able SKR, and authenticated classical exchanges are assumed throughout [56], [57], see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. QKD threat/issue taxonomy. • Free-space: turbulence and pointing/tracking challenges (link stability and estimation robustness) [4], with modality-agnostic implications for DV and CV. C. Protocol-Level Issues ML-based analysis of QKD key-length choices is relevant to the protocol/process layer because key length, security margin, and post-processing cost jointly affect practical SKR and robustness [75]. • Parameter … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Device/measurement side-channels: CV homodyne chain (LO, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Channel tampering/DoS: bias pathway from optical manipulation to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Free-space stabilization: FSM–QD–PID closed loop with RL-assisted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Protocol pipeline with screening hooks and finite-key coupling (larger [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Adversarial robustness pipeline for QKD attack detectors and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Deployment stack and monitoring placement. Telemetry flows upward [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Quantum cryptography,

    N. Gisin, G. G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, “Quantum cryptography,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 74, no. 1, p. 145, 2002

    2002

  2. [2]

    Continuous variable quantum key distribution,

    Y . M. Li, X. Y . Wang, Z. L. Bai, W. Y . Liu, S. S. Yang, and K. C. Peng, “Continuous variable quantum key distribution,”Chinese Physics B, vol. 26, no. 4, p. 040303, Apr. 2017

    2017

  3. [3]

    The security of practical quantum key distribution,

    V . Scarani, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N. J. Cerf, M. Du ˇsek, N. L ¨utkenhaus, and M. Peev, “The security of practical quantum key distribution,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 1301– 1350, 2009

    2009

  4. [4]

    Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices,

    F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo, and J.-W. Pan, “Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 92, no. 2, p. 025002, May 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Local oscillator fluctuation opens a loophole for eve in practical continuous-variable quantum-key-distribution systems,

    X. C. Ma, S. H. Sun, M. S. Jiang, and L. M. Liang, “Local oscillator fluctuation opens a loophole for eve in practical continuous-variable quantum-key-distribution systems,”Physical Review A, vol. 88, no. 2, p. 022339, Aug. 2013

    2013

  6. [6]

    Quantum hacking of a continuous-variable quantum-key-distribution system using a wavelength attack,

    J. Z. Huanget al., “Quantum hacking of a continuous-variable quantum-key-distribution system using a wavelength attack,”Physical Review A, vol. 87, no. 6, p. 062329, Jun. 2013

    2013

  7. [7]

    Wavelength attack on practical continuous-variable quantum-key-distribution system with a heterodyne protocol,

    X. C. Ma, S. H. Sun, M. S. Jiang, and L. M. Liang, “Wavelength attack on practical continuous-variable quantum-key-distribution system with a heterodyne protocol,”Physical Review A, vol. 87, no. 5, p. 052309, May 2013

    2013

  8. [8]

    Preventing calibration attacks on the local oscillator in continuous-variable quantum key distribution,

    P. Jouguet, S. Kunz-Jacques, and E. Diamanti, “Preventing calibration attacks on the local oscillator in continuous-variable quantum key distribution,”Physical Review A, vol. 87, no. 6, p. 062313, Jun. 2013

    2013

Show all 119 references
  1. [9]

    Quantum hacking: Saturation attack on practical continuous-variable quantum key distribution,

    H. Qin, R. Kumar, and R. All ´eaume, “Quantum hacking: Saturation attack on practical continuous-variable quantum key distribution,” Physical Review A, vol. 94, no. 1, p. 012325, Jul. 2016

    2016

  2. [10]

    Homodyne-detector- blinding attack in continuous-variable quantum key distribution,

    H. Qin, R. Kumar, V . Makarov, and R. All´eaume, “Homodyne-detector- blinding attack in continuous-variable quantum key distribution,”Phys- ical Review A, vol. 98, no. 1, p. 012312, Jul. 2018

    2018

  3. [11]

    Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination,

    L. Lydersen, C. Wiechers, C. Wittmann, D. Elser, J. Skaar, and V . Makarov, “Hacking commercial quantum cryptography systems by tailored bright illumination,”Nature Photonics, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 686– 689, 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    After-gate attack on a quantum cryptosystem,

    C. Wiecherset al., “After-gate attack on a quantum cryptosystem,”New Journal of Physics, vol. 13, p. 013043, Jan. 2011

    2011

  5. [13]

    Time-shift attack in practical quantum cryptosystems,

    B. Qi, “Time-shift attack in practical quantum cryptosystems,”Quan- tum Information and Computation, vol. 7, pp. 73–82, 2007

    2007

  6. [14]

    Phase-remapping attack in practical quantum-key-distribution systems,

    C. H. F. Fung, B. Qi, K. Tamaki, and H. K. Lo, “Phase-remapping attack in practical quantum-key-distribution systems,”Physical Review A, vol. 75, no. 3, p. 032314, Mar. 2007

    2007

  7. [15]

    Advances in continuous variable measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution,

    P. Wang, Y . Tian, and Y . Li, “Advances in continuous variable measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution,”Science China Information Sciences, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 1–17, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Long-distance continuous- variable quantum key distribution by controlling excess noise,

    D. Huang, P. Huang, D. Lin, and G. Zeng, “Long-distance continuous- variable quantum key distribution by controlling excess noise,”Scien- tific Reports, vol. 6, p. 19201, Jan. 2016

    2016

  9. [17]

    Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous- variable quantum key distribution,

    P. Jouguet, S. Kunz-Jacques, A. Leverrier, P. Grangier, and E. Dia- manti, “Experimental demonstration of long-distance continuous- variable quantum key distribution,”Nature Photonics, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 378–381, 2013

    2013

  10. [18]

    Monitoring of continuous-variable quantum key distribution system in real environ- ment,

    W. Liu, J. Peng, P. Huang, D. Huang, and G. Zeng, “Monitoring of continuous-variable quantum key distribution system in real environ- ment,”Optics Express, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 19 429–19 443, 2017

    2017

  11. [19]

    Continuous-variable quantum key distribution over 60 km optical fiber with real local oscillator,

    A. A. E. Hajomer, H. Mani, N. Jain, H.-M. Chin, U. L. Andersen, and T. Gehring, “Continuous-variable quantum key distribution over 60 km optical fiber with real local oscillator,” inEuropean Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC) 2022 Technical Digest, J. Leuthold, C. Hard...

    2022

  12. [20]

    Remote quantum networks based on quantum memories,

    T.-X. Zhu, X. Liu, Z.-Q. Zhou, and C.-F. Li, “Remote quantum networks based on quantum memories,”Nanophotonics, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1975–1992, 2025

    1975

  13. [21]

    Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collec- tive attacks,

    A. Ac ´ın, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, S. Massar, S. Pironio, and V . Scarani, “Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collec- tive attacks,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, no. 23, p. 230501, Jun. 2007

    2007

  14. [22]

    Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution,

    H. K. Lo, M. Curty, and B. Qi, “Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 13, p. 130503, Mar. 2012

    2012

  15. [23]

    Experi- mental demonstration of polarization encoding measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution,

    Z. Tang, Z. Liao, F. Xu, B. Qi, L. Qian, and H. K. Lo, “Experi- mental demonstration of polarization encoding measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 112, no. 19, p. 190503, May 2014

    2014

  16. [24]

    Integrating machine learning to achieve an automatic parameter prediction for practical continuous-variable quantum key distribution,

    W. Liu, P. Huang, J. Peng, J. Fan, and G. Zeng, “Integrating machine learning to achieve an automatic parameter prediction for practical continuous-variable quantum key distribution,”Physical Review A, vol. 97, no. 2, p. 022316, Feb. 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    Machine learning for optimal parameter prediction in quantum key distribution,

    W. Wang and H. K. Lo, “Machine learning for optimal parameter prediction in quantum key distribution,”Physical Review A, vol. 100, no. 6, p. 062334, Dec. 2019

    2019

  18. [26]

    Predicting optimal parameters with random forest for quantum key distribution,

    H. J. Ding, J. Y . Liu, C. M. Zhang, and Q. Wang, “Predicting optimal parameters with random forest for quantum key distribution,”Quantum Information Processing, vol. 19, no. 2, Feb. 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Parameter optimization based bpnn of atmosphere continuous-variable quantum key distribution,

    Y . Su, Y . Guo, and D. Huang, “Parameter optimization based bpnn of atmosphere continuous-variable quantum key distribution,”Entropy, vol. 21, no. 9, Sep. 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    Practical phase-modulation stabilization in quantum key distribution via machine learning,

    J. Y . Liu, H. J. Ding, C. M. Zhang, S. P. Xie, and Q. Wang, “Practical phase-modulation stabilization in quantum key distribution via machine learning,”Physical Review Applied, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 014059, 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    Detecting quantum attacks: A machine learning based defense strategy for practical continuous-variable quantum key distribution,

    Y . Maoet al., “Detecting quantum attacks: A machine learning based defense strategy for practical continuous-variable quantum key distribution,”New Journal of Physics, vol. 22, no. 8, Aug. 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    Multi-attack detection: General defense strategy based on neural networks for cv-qkd,

    H. Du and D. Huang, “Multi-attack detection: General defense strategy based on neural networks for cv-qkd,”Photonics, vol. 9, no. 3, Mar. 2022. 16

    2022

  23. [31]

    Detecting practical quantum attacks for continuous-variable quantum key distribution using density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN),

    Q. Liao, Z. Wang, H. Liu, Y . Mao, and X. Fu, “Detecting practical quantum attacks for continuous-variable quantum key distribution using density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN),” Physical Review A, vol. 106, no. 2, p. 022607, Aug. 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Adversarial perturbation elimination with gan based defense in continuous-variable quantum key distribution systems,

    X. Tang, P. Yin, Z. Zhou, and D. Huang, “Adversarial perturbation elimination with gan based defense in continuous-variable quantum key distribution systems,”Electronics, vol. 12, no. 11, Jun. 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Adversarial attack defense method for a continuous-variable quantum key distribution system based on kernel robust manifold non-negative matrix factorization,

    Y . Fu, E. Xia, D. Huang, and Y . Jing, “Adversarial attack defense method for a continuous-variable quantum key distribution system based on kernel robust manifold non-negative matrix factorization,” Applied Sciences, vol. 13, no. 17, p. 9928, Sep. 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Sifting scheme for continuous-variable quantum key distribution with short samples,

    Z. Wuet al., “Sifting scheme for continuous-variable quantum key distribution with short samples,”Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 694–704, 2022

    2022

  27. [35]

    Noise prediction based on ma- chine learning in quantum secured SWDM B5G fronthaul networks,

    C. Wang, Y . Sun, W. Kong, and Y . Gao, “Noise prediction based on ma- chine learning in quantum secured SWDM B5G fronthaul networks,” inProceedings of the 2022 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT). IEEE, Nov. 2022, pp. 1426– 1431

    2022

  28. [36]

    Noise-suppressing channel allo- cation in dynamic DWDM-QKD networks using LightGBM,

    J. Niu, Y . Sun, Y . Zhang, and Y . Ji, “Noise-suppressing channel allo- cation in dynamic DWDM-QKD networks using LightGBM,”Optics Express, vol. 27, no. 22, p. 31741, Oct. 2019

    2019

  29. [37]

    Machine learning techniques for enhancing quantum key distribution,

    A. Al-Kuwari, S. Alqrinawi, L. Al-Amir, A. Mollazehi, and S. Al- Kuwari, “Machine learning techniques for enhancing quantum key distribution,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.07384, 2026

    2026

  30. [38]

    Optiqkd: A machine learning-optimized framework for real-time parameter tuning in quan- tum key distribution,

    N. Mohamed, J. Kaldari, and S. Al-Kuwari, “Optiqkd: A machine learning-optimized framework for real-time parameter tuning in quan- tum key distribution,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04192, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Ai-driven quantum cryptography: Machine learning for robust qkd, secure operations, and quantum-safe integra- tion,

    A. Gupta and S. Mittal, “Ai-driven quantum cryptography: Machine learning for robust qkd, secure operations, and quantum-safe integra- tion,” in2026 IEEE 5th International Conference on AI in Cybersecu- rity (ICAIC). IEEE, 2026, pp. 1–5

    2026

  32. [40]

    Cyber-security threats and side-channel attacks for digital agriculture,

    A. N. Alahmadi, S. U. Rehman, H. S. Alhazmi, D. G. Glynn, H. Shoaib, and P. Sol´e, “Cyber-security threats and side-channel attacks for digital agriculture,”Sensors, vol. 22, no. 9, May 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    TIDCS: A dynamic intrusion detection and classification system based feature selection,

    Z. Chkirbene, A. Erbad, R. Hamila, A. Mohamed, M. Guizani, and M. Hamdi, “TIDCS: A dynamic intrusion detection and classification system based feature selection,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 95 864– 95 877, 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    A deep learning approach for intrusion detection system in industry network,

    A. Hijazi, A. El Safadi, and J.-M. Flaus, “A deep learning approach for intrusion detection system in industry network,” inProceedings of BDCSIntell, 2018, pp. 55–62

    2018

  35. [43]

    Vacca,Computer and Information Security Handbook

    J. Vacca,Computer and Information Security Handbook. Newnes, 2012

    2012

  36. [44]

    Intrusion detection system: A comprehensive review,

    H. J. Liao, C. H. R. Lin, Y . C. Lin, and K. Y . Tung, “Intrusion detection system: A comprehensive review,”Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2013

    2013

  37. [45]

    TSE-IDS: A two-stage classifier ensemble for intelligent anomaly-based intrusion detection system,

    B. A. Tama, M. Comuzzi, and K. H. Rhee, “TSE-IDS: A two-stage classifier ensemble for intelligent anomaly-based intrusion detection system,”IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 94 497–94 507, 2019

    2019

  38. [46]

    Anomaly-based network intrusion detection: Techniques, systems and challenges,

    P. Garc ´ıa-Teodoro, J. D ´ıaz-Verdejo, G. Maci ´a-Fern´andez, and E. V´azquez, “Anomaly-based network intrusion detection: Techniques, systems and challenges,”Computer & Security, vol. 28, no. 1–2, pp. 18–28, Feb. 2009

    2009

  39. [47]

    A comprehen- sive survey of databases and deep learning methods for cybersecurity and intrusion detection systems,

    D. G ¨um¨us ¸bas ¸, T. Yıldırım, A. Genovese, and F. Scotti, “A comprehen- sive survey of databases and deep learning methods for cybersecurity and intrusion detection systems,”IEEE Systems Journal, Jun. 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    A brief analysis on efficient machine learning techniques for intrusion detection model to provide network security,

    A. Sirisha and B. Premamayudu, “A brief analysis on efficient machine learning techniques for intrusion detection model to provide network security,” inProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems (ICSCDS 2023). IEEE, ...

    2023

  41. [49]

    A secure optimization routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks,

    U. Srilakshmi, S. A. Alghamdi, V . A. Vuyyuru, N. Veeraiah, and Y . Alotaibi, “A secure optimization routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 14 260–14 269, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Energy-efficient co- operative routing scheme for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks,

    L. L. Hung, F. Y . Leu, K. L. Tsai, and C. Y . Ko, “Energy-efficient co- operative routing scheme for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 56 321–56 332, 2020

    2020

  43. [51]

    Quantum secure direct communication: whispering with photons,

    M. Wang and G.-L. Long, “Quantum secure direct communication: whispering with photons,”National Science Review, p. nwaf096, 2025

    2025

  44. [52]

    High key rate continuous-variable quantum key distribution using telecom optical components,

    T. Wang, P. Huang, L. Li, Y . Zhou, and G. Zeng, “High key rate continuous-variable quantum key distribution using telecom optical components,”New Journal of Physics, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 023002, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Continuous variable quantum key distribution: Finite- key analysis of composable security against coherent attacks,

    F. Furreret al., “Continuous variable quantum key distribution: Finite- key analysis of composable security against coherent attacks,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 109, no. 10, p. 100502, Sep. 2012

    2012

  46. [54]

    Security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution via a gaussian de finetti reduction,

    A. Leverrier, “Security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution via a gaussian de finetti reduction,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 118, no. 20, p. 200501, May 2017

    2017

  47. [55]

    Qkd protocol for securing the communication with real-life application scenarios,

    H. A. Al-Mohammed, E. Yaacoub, and K. Abualsaud, “Qkd protocol for securing the communication with real-life application scenarios,” inQuantum Computing and Cryptography in Future Computers. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2024, pp. 209–230

    2024

  48. [56]

    Multidimensional reconciliation for a continuous-variable quantum key distribution,

    A. Leverrier, R. All ´eaume, J. Boutros, G. Z ´emor, and P. Grangier, “Multidimensional reconciliation for a continuous-variable quantum key distribution,”Physical Review A, vol. 77, no. 4, p. 042325, Apr. 2008

    2008

  49. [57]

    Mitigation of channel tampering attacks in continuous-variable quan- tum key distribution,

    S. P. Kish, C. Thapa, M. Sayat, H. Suzuki, J. Pieprzyk, and S. Camtepe, “Mitigation of channel tampering attacks in continuous-variable quan- tum key distribution,”Physical Review Research, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 023301, Jun. 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Controlling optical- cavity locking using reinforcement learning,

    E. Fazzari, H. A. Loughlin, and C. Stoughton, “Controlling optical- cavity locking using reinforcement learning,”Machine Learning: Sci- ence and Technology, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 035027, 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Improving robustness of quan- tum feedback control with reinforcement learning,

    M. Guatto, G. A. Susto, and F. Ticozzi, “Improving robustness of quan- tum feedback control with reinforcement learning,”Physical Review A, vol. 110, no. 1, p. 012605, 2024

    2024

  52. [60]

    En- hancing data security in satellite communication systems: Integrating quantum cryptography with catboost machine learning,

    M. Nadeem, S. Anas Ansar, S. Halwai, A. Singh, and R. Kumar, “En- hancing data security in satellite communication systems: Integrating quantum cryptography with catboost machine learning,”Information, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 220, 2026

    2026

  53. [61]

    Influence of four- wave mixing in short- and medium-range 1310 nm dense wavelength division multiplexing systems,

    K. Markowski, Ł. Chorchos, and J. P. Turkiewicz, “Influence of four- wave mixing in short- and medium-range 1310 nm dense wavelength division multiplexing systems,”Applied Optics, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 3051–3057, 2016

    2016

  54. [62]

    Core and wavelength allocation of sending-or-not-sending quantum key distribution for future metropoli- tan networks over multicore fiber,

    W. Kong, Y . Sun, Y . Gao, and Y . Ji, “Core and wavelength allocation of sending-or-not-sending quantum key distribution for future metropoli- tan networks over multicore fiber,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2022, Technical Digest, S. Matsuo, D. Plant, J. Sh...

    2022

  55. [63]

    Fiber-optic trans- mission and networking: the previous 20 and the next 20 years,

    P. J. Winzer, D. T. Neilson, and A. R. Chraplyvy, “Fiber-optic trans- mission and networking: the previous 20 and the next 20 years,”Optics Express, vol. 26, no. 18, pp. 24 190–24 239, 2018

    2018

  56. [64]

    Towards multiband optical systems,

    A. Napoliet al., “Towards multiband optical systems,” inPhotonic Networks and Devices (PND). Optica Publishing Group, 2018, pp. NeTu3E–1

    2018

  57. [65]

    Distributing secret keys with quan- tum continuous variables: Principle, security and implementations,

    E. Diamanti and A. Leverrier, “Distributing secret keys with quan- tum continuous variables: Principle, security and implementations,” Entropy, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 6072–6092, 2015

    2015

  58. [66]

    Deep learning based latent feature extraction for intrusion detection,

    S. N. Mighan and M. Kahani, “Deep learning based latent feature extraction for intrusion detection,” in2018 Iranian Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE), 2018, pp. 1511–1516

    2018

  59. [67]

    ESCV AD: An energy-saving routing protocol based on voronoi adaptive clustering for wireless sensor networks,

    N. Ma, H. Zhang, H. Hu, and Y . Qin, “ESCV AD: An energy-saving routing protocol based on voronoi adaptive clustering for wireless sensor networks,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 9071–9085, Jun. 2022

    2022

  60. [68]

    Detecting attackers during quantum key distribution in IoT networks using neural networks,

    H. A. Al-Mohammed, A. Al-Ali, E. Yaacoub, K. Abualsaud, and T. Khattab, “Detecting attackers during quantum key distribution in IoT networks using neural networks,” inGLOBECOM 2021 - 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2021

    2021

  61. [69]

    On the use of quantum communications for securing IoT devices in the 6G era,

    H. A. Al-Mohammed and E. Yaacoub, “On the use of quantum communications for securing IoT devices in the 6G era,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), 2021, pp. 1–6

    2021

  62. [70]

    Machine learning techniques for detecting attackers during quantum key distribution in IoT networks with appli- cation to railway scenarios,

    H. A. Al-Mohammedet al., “Machine learning techniques for detecting attackers during quantum key distribution in IoT networks with appli- cation to railway scenarios,”IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 136 994–137 004, 2021

    2021

  63. [71]

    Quantum key distribution with application to iot security,

    H. A. J. Al-Mohammed, “Quantum key distribution with application to iot security,” Master’s thesis, Qatar Univesity, 2021

    2021

  64. [72]

    A thermodynamic approach to linear and quantum cross- talk in multimode fiber systems,

    M. Zitelli, “A thermodynamic approach to linear and quantum cross- talk in multimode fiber systems,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2025

    2025

  65. [73]

    Sample classification using machine learning-assisted entangled two-photon absorption,

    ´A. Mart ´ınez-Tapia and R. d. J. Le ´on-Montiel, “Sample classification using machine learning-assisted entangled two-photon absorption,”AVS Quantum Science, vol. 7, no. 2, 2025

    2025

  66. [74]

    Quantum machine learning for 6g network intelligence and adversarial threats,

    V .-L. Nguyen, L.-H. Nguyen, R.-H. Hwang, B. Canberk, and T. Q. Duong, “Quantum machine learning for 6g network intelligence and adversarial threats,”IEEE, 2025, early access; maps QML threats (kernel poisoning, PQC/VQA backdoors, adversarial qubit noise) and defenses for 6G/Q...

    2025

  67. [75]

    The impact of key lengths on qkd security: An ml study,

    H. A. Al-Mohammed, A. S. Al-Ali, E. Yaacoub, and K. Abualsaud, “The impact of key lengths on qkd security: An ml study,” inQuantum Computing and Cryptography in Future Computers. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2024, pp. 231–250

    2024

  68. [76]

    Analysis of imperfections in practical continuous-variable quantum key distri- bution,

    P. Jouguet, S. Kunz-Jacques, E. Diamanti, and A. Leverrier, “Analysis of imperfections in practical continuous-variable quantum key distri- bution,”Physical Review A, vol. 86, no. 3, p. 032309, Sep. 2012

    2012

  69. [77]

    Practical security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with finite sampling bandwidth effects,

    C. Wang, P. Huang, D. Huang, D. Lin, and G. Zeng, “Practical security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with finite sampling bandwidth effects,”Physical Review A, vol. 93, no. 2, p. 022315, Feb. 2016

    2016

  70. [78]

    Improving the secret key rate of coherent quantum key distribution with Bayesian inference,

    S. Kleis and C. G. Schaeffer, “Improving the secret key rate of coherent quantum key distribution with Bayesian inference,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 722–728, Feb. 2019

    2019

  71. [79]

    Towards scalable quantum key distribution: A machine learning-based cascade protocol approach,

    H. A. Al-Mohammed, S. Al-Kuwari, H. Kuniyil, and A. Farouk, “Towards scalable quantum key distribution: A machine learning-based cascade protocol approach,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08038, 2024

    2024

  72. [80]

    One-pixel attack for continuous- variable quantum key distribution systems,

    Y . Guo, P. Yin, and D. Huang, “One-pixel attack for continuous- variable quantum key distribution systems,”Photonics, vol. 10, no. 2, Feb. 2023

    2023

  73. [81]

    Quantum adversarial machine learning,

    S. Lu, L. M. Duan, and D. L. Deng, “Quantum adversarial machine learning,”Physical Review Research, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 033212, Aug. 2020

    2020

  74. [82]

    Experimental quantum adversarial learning with pro- grammable superconducting qubits,

    W. Renet al., “Experimental quantum adversarial learning with pro- grammable superconducting qubits,”Nature Computational Science, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 711–717, Nov. 2022

    2022

  75. [83]

    Artificial key fingerprints for continuous-variable quan- tum key distribution,

    Y . Yanet al., “Artificial key fingerprints for continuous-variable quan- tum key distribution,”Physical Review A, vol. 108, no. 1, p. 012601, Jul. 2023

    2023

  76. [84]

    Multi-tenant provisioning for quantum key distribution networks with heuristics and reinforcement learning: A comparative study,

    Y . Cao, Y . Zhao, J. Li, R. Lin, J. Zhang, and J. Chen, “Multi-tenant provisioning for quantum key distribution networks with heuristics and reinforcement learning: A comparative study,”IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 946–957, Jun. 2020

    2020

  77. [85]

    Hybrid trusted/untrusted relay-based quantum key distribution over optical backbone networks,

    ——, “Hybrid trusted/untrusted relay-based quantum key distribution over optical backbone networks,”IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2701–2718, Sep. 2021

    2021

  78. [86]

    Privacy-preserving intelligent resource allocation for federated edge learning in quantum internet,

    M. Xuet al., “Privacy-preserving intelligent resource allocation for federated edge learning in quantum internet,”IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 142–157, Jan. 2023

    2023

  79. [87]

    Continuous variable quantum cryptog- raphy using coherent states,

    F. Grosshans and P. Grangier, “Continuous variable quantum cryptog- raphy using coherent states,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 5, p. 057902, 2002

    2002

  80. [88]

    Practical security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with reduced optical attenuation,

    Y . Zheng, P. Huang, A. Huang, J. Peng, and G. Zeng, “Practical security of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with reduced optical attenuation,”Physical Review A, vol. 100, no. 1, p. 012313, Jul. 2019

    2019

  81. [89]

    Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system,

    I. Gerhardt, Q. Liu, A. A. Lamas-Linares, J. Skaar, C. Kurtsiefer, and V . Makarov, “Full-field implementation of a perfect eavesdropper on a quantum cryptography system,”Nature Communications, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011

    2011

  82. [90]

    Inverse system design using machine learning: The raman amplifier case,

    D. Zibar, A. M. Rosa Brusin, U. C. De Moura, F. Da Ros, V . Curri, and A. Carena, “Inverse system design using machine learning: The raman amplifier case,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 736–753, Feb. 2020

    2020

  83. [91]

    Revis- iting multi-step nonlinearity compensation with machine learning,

    C. H ¨ager, H. D. Pfister, R. M. B¨utler, G. Liga, and A. Alvarado, “Revis- iting multi-step nonlinearity compensation with machine learning,” in 45th European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC 2019), 2019, pp. 1–4

    2019

  84. [92]

    An optical communi- cation’s perspective on machine learning and its applications,

    F. N. Khan, Q. Fan, C. Lu, and A. P. T. Lau, “An optical communi- cation’s perspective on machine learning and its applications,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 493–516, Jan. 2019

    2019

  85. [93]

    End-to-end deep learning of optical fiber com- munications,

    B. Karanovet al., “End-to-end deep learning of optical fiber com- munications,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 36, no. 20, pp. 4843–4855, Oct. 2018

    2018

  86. [94]

    Machine learning for long-distance quantum communication,

    J. Walln ¨ofer, A. A. Melnikov, W. D ¨ur, and H. J. Briegel, “Machine learning for long-distance quantum communication,”PRX Quantum, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 010301, Sep. 2020

    2020

  87. [95]

    Secure continuous-variable quantum key distribution with machine learning,

    D. Huang, S. Liu, and L. Zhang, “Secure continuous-variable quantum key distribution with machine learning,”Photonics, vol. 8, no. 11, 2021

    2021

  88. [96]

    Advancing classical and quantum communication systems with machine learning,

    D. Zibaret al., “Advancing classical and quantum communication systems with machine learning,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC) 2020. Optica Publishing Group, 2020, p. W1K.1

    2020

  89. [97]

    End-to-end learning for GMI optimized geometric constellation shape,

    R. T. Jones, M. P. Yankov, and D. Zibar, “End-to-end learning for GMI optimized geometric constellation shape,” in45th European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC 2019), 2019, pp. 1–4

    2019

  90. [98]

    A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,

    W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems,” arXiv preprint, 2019, no. June, pp. 134–142

    2019

  91. [99]

    Multicore fiber-based quantum access network,

    C. Cai, Y . Sun, J. Niu, P. Zhang, Y . Zhang, and Y . Ji, “Multicore fiber-based quantum access network,” arXiv preprint, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.05932

    2019 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Deep learning-based defect identification for quantum key distribution devices,

    X. Sun, W.-P. Shao, P. Lv, Y .-N. Mao, Q.-X. Chen, and H. Wu, “Deep learning-based defect identification for quantum key distribution devices,”IEEE Photonics Journal, no. 99, pp. 1–9, 2025

    2025

  93. [101]

    V . P. Rajendran, D. Perumalsamy, C. Ponnusamy, and E. Kalaiman- nan, “An efficient continuous-variable quantum key distribution with parameter optimization using elitist elk herd random immigrants opti- mizer and adaptive depthwise separable convolutional neural network,” Fut...

    2025

  94. [102]

    Qnn-qrl: Quantum neural network integrated with quantum reinforcement learning for quantum key distribution,

    B. K. Behera, S. Al-Kuwari, and A. Farouk, “Qnn-qrl: Quantum neural network integrated with quantum reinforcement learning for quantum key distribution,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18188, 2025

    2025

  95. [103]

    On the tradeoffs of fso communications in uav networks under varying weather con- ditions,

    H. Al-Mohammed, K. Abualsaud, and E. Yaacoub, “On the tradeoffs of fso communications in uav networks under varying weather con- ditions,” in2024 International Telecommunications Conference (ITC- Egypt). IEEE, 2024, pp. 8–13

    2024

  96. [104]

    Fso communica- tion system for high-speed trains under varying visibility conditions,

    H. A. Al-Mohammed, M. Al-Ali, and E. Yaacoub, “Fso communica- tion system for high-speed trains under varying visibility conditions,” Vehicular Communications, vol. 43, p. 100634, 2023

    2023

  97. [105]

    Advancing secure communications in high- mobility environments: Integrating quantum key distribution, free space optics, and high-altitude platforms for enhanced IoT networks,

    H. A. Al-Mohammed, “Advancing secure communications in high- mobility environments: Integrating quantum key distribution, free space optics, and high-altitude platforms for enhanced IoT networks,” Ph.D. dissertation, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar, 2026

    2026

  98. [106]

    Resisting quantum key distribution attacks using quantum machine learning,

    A. Al-Kuwari, N. Mohamed, S. Al-Kuwari, A. Farouk, and B. K. Behera, “Resisting quantum key distribution attacks using quantum machine learning,”IET Quantum Communication, vol. 7, no. 1, p. e70028, 2026

    2026

  99. [107]

    Reputa- tion based traffic event validation and vehicle authentication using blockchain technology,

    M. S. Al-Ali, H. A. Al-Mohammed, and M. Alkaeed, “Reputa- tion based traffic event validation and vehicle authentication using blockchain technology,” in2020 IEEE International Conference on Informatics, IoT, and Enabling Technologies (ICIoT). IEEE, 2020, pp. 451–456

    2020

  100. [108]

    Quantum leaps in the sky: Composable xor–relay qkd over haps for next-gen 6g networks,

    H. A. Al-Mohammed and E. Yaacoub, “Quantum leaps in the sky: Composable xor–relay qkd over haps for next-gen 6g networks,” in 2025 IEEE 11th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–6

    2025

  101. [109]

    New way to generating and simulation qkd,

    ——, “New way to generating and simulation qkd,” inProceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology: ICICT 2021, London, Volume 3. Springer, 2021, pp. 801–809

    2021

  102. [110]

    Free space optics communication for ultra-high-speed train running in evacuated tube,

    ——, “Free space optics communication for ultra-high-speed train running in evacuated tube,”Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 17, p. 8545, 2022

    2022

  103. [111]

    Quantum hacking on an integrated continuous-variable quantum key distribution system via power analysis,

    Y . Zheng, H. Shi, W. Pan, Q. Wang, and J. Mao, “Quantum hacking on an integrated continuous-variable quantum key distribution system via power analysis,”Entropy, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 176, 2021

    2021

  104. [112]

    Laser-damage attack against optical attenuators in quan- tum key distribution,

    A. Huang, R. Li, V . Egorov, S. Tchouragoulov, K. Kumar, and V . Makarov, “Laser-damage attack against optical attenuators in quan- tum key distribution,”Physical Review Applied, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 034017, feb 2020

    2020

  105. [113]

    System level analysis of fast, per-core DVFS using on-chip switching regulators,

    W. Kim, M. S. Gupta, G.-Y . Wei, and D. Brooks, “System level analysis of fast, per-core DVFS using on-chip switching regulators,” inProceedings of the 2008 IEEE 14th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA). IEEE, 2008

    2008

  106. [114]

    An on-chip signal suppression countermeasure to power analysis attacks,

    G. B. Ratanpal, R. D. Williams, and T. N. Blalock, “An on-chip signal suppression countermeasure to power analysis attacks,”IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 179–189, 2004

    2004

  107. [115]

    Fog computing: Helping the internet of things realize its potential,

    A. V . Dastjerdi and R. Buyya, “Fog computing: Helping the internet of things realize its potential,”Computer, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 112–116, 2016

    2016

  108. [116]

    Experimental demonstration of quantum key distribution (QKD) for energy-efficient software-defined internet of things,

    A. Mavromatis, F. Ntavou, E. H. Salas, G. T. Kanellos, R. Nejabati, and D. Simeonidou, “Experimental demonstration of quantum key distribution (QKD) for energy-efficient software-defined internet of things,” details not provided in the source

  109. [117]

    Metaverse unbound: A survey on synergistic integration between semantic communication, 6g, and edge learning,

    M. Z. Aloudat, A. Aboumadi, A. Soliman, H. Al-Mohammed, M. Al- Ali, A. Mahgoub, M. Barhamgi, and E. Yaacoub, “Metaverse unbound: A survey on synergistic integration between semantic communication, 6g, and edge learning,”IEEE Access, 2025

    2025

  110. [118]

    Quantum key distribution in multiple fiber networks and its application 18 in urban communications: A comprehensive review,

    G. Granados, W. Velasquez, R. Cajo, and M. Antonieta-Alvarez, “Quantum key distribution in multiple fiber networks and its application 18 in urban communications: A comprehensive review,”IEEE Access, 2025

    2025

  111. [119]

    A hybrid framework integrating qml, ai, and quantum- safe cryptography for cybersecurity,

    R. Gunasridharan, A. Altalbe, B. M. Gurusamy, G. Pallavi, and P. K. Rangarajan, “A hybrid framework integrating qml, ai, and quantum- safe cryptography for cybersecurity,”Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–29, 2026. 19 TABLE II MASTERCOMP...

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.