pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27514 · v1 · pith:4H5LX64Anew · submitted 2026-05-26 · 🌀 gr-qc · cond-mat.dis-nn

Charting causal set configuration space with graph observables

Astrid Eichhorn , Harald Mack , Kim Tuyen Le , Fabian Wagner This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 15:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc cond-mat.dis-nn
keywords causal setsgraph observablesconfiguration spacelink degree distributiongraph Laplaciancausal intervalsHasse diagrammanifoldlike causal sets
0
0 comments X

The pith

Three graph observables distinguish nine classes of causal sets by their low internal fluctuations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests a practical way to navigate the huge configuration space of causal sets by examining nine distinct classes, some manifoldlike with varying curvature and others like lattices or quasicrystals. It avoids costly curvature measures that fluctuate strongly and instead checks simpler graph statistics for their ability to tell classes apart. Three observables stand out because their values remain consistent inside each class: the distribution of link degrees, the eigenvalues of the graph Laplacian on the symmetrized Hasse diagram, and the count of causal intervals. A reader would care because these statistics offer an efficient route to classifying the discrete structures that appear in causal-set approaches to quantum gravity.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the link degree distribution, the eigenvalues of the graph Laplacian of the symmetrized Hasse diagram, and the abundance of causal intervals can distinguish between nine classes of causal sets. These classes include manifoldlike sets with inhomogeneous Ricci curvature (both topologically trivial and nontrivial), non-manifoldlike sets such as lattices, layered orders, and Lorentzian quasicrystals, and sets expected to become manifoldlike under coarse graining. The distinguishing power arises because the three observables exhibit small fluctuations within most of the classes.

What carries the argument

The three graph observables (link degree distribution, eigenvalues of the graph Laplacian on the symmetrized Hasse diagram, and abundance of causal intervals) that act as low-variance classifiers for causal-set classes.

If this is right

  • The three observables supply a computationally cheaper alternative to curvature invariants for exploring causal-set space.
  • Classes that recover manifoldlike behavior under coarse graining can still be identified before that limit is taken.
  • Both topologically trivial and nontrivial manifoldlike causal sets are separated by the same statistics.
  • Non-manifoldlike examples such as Lorentzian quasicrystals are distinguishable from lattices and layered orders.
  • The method works for the tested volume range without requiring continuum-geometry calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the observables remain stable at volumes relevant to continuum recovery, they could be used to sample the measure over causal sets in numerical quantum-gravity simulations.
  • The same statistics might serve as quick filters when generating random causal sets for other discrete-gravity models.
  • Extending the test to ensembles drawn directly from the full configuration space (rather than hand-picked classes) would check whether the nine examples capture the main structural distinctions.
  • Combinations of the three observables could define a low-dimensional chart of causal-set space whose axes have direct graph-theoretic meaning.

Load-bearing premise

The nine chosen classes are representative of the full configuration space and the distinguishing power of the observables survives at larger volumes and under coarse graining.

What would settle it

Finding substantial overlap between the observable values of two different classes or large fluctuations inside one class when the causal sets are scaled to higher volume would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27514 by Astrid Eichhorn, Fabian Wagner, Harald Mack, Kim Tuyen Le.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. We provide an example of a box in 1+1 dimensional spacetime (on which a nontrivial conformal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. We change the spacetime topology by excising cuts that do not meet the boundary of the spacetime [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Left: illustration of two characteristic segments of a grid with relative length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Left: Sketch of projection of hypercubic lattice in Cartesian coordinates in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Left: Distribution of average connectivities in two-dimensional topologically trivial spacetimes, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Sketches of three undirected graphs of 30 nodes with three distinguished subgraphs of 10 nodes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Link-degree distribution for different kinds of causal sets compared to sprinklings into topologically [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Distinguishability probabilities using the link-degree distribution for spacetimes with handles, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Interval abundances for different kinds of causal sets compared to sprinklings into topologically [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Left panels: We show the regular lattice causets embedded in Cartesian coordinates; right panels: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Fourier transform of fluctuation of quasicrystal abundances [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Distinguishability probabilities using the interval abundances for spacetimes with handles, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Laplacian eigenvalues for different kinds of causal sets compared to sprinklings into topologically [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Distinguishability probabilities using the graph-Laplacian eigenvalues for spacetimes with handles, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p044_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Height profile for different kinds of causal sets compared to sprinklings into topologically trivial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Skewness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Degree distribution for manifoldlike causets of trivial topology with varying causal-set size (left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Interval abundances for manifoldlike causets of trivial topology with varying causal-set size (left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Graph-Laplacian eigenvalues for manifoldlike causets of trivial topology with varying size, boundary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Height profile for manifoldlike causets of trivial topology with varying parameters. Every single [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. Scaling exponents for sample-size scaling of means and standard deviations of the considered graph [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_21.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The configuration space of causal sets is vast. It is a critical goal to map out this space. Here, we take a practical step towards this goal. We investigate nine classes of causal sets, most of them not studied before. These include manifoldlike causal sets with inhomogeneous Ricci curvature, both topologically trivial and nontrivial. We also study classes of non-manifoldlike causal sets, including lattices, layered orders as well as Lorentzian quasicrystals. Finally, we study classes of causal sets that are not manifoldlike, but are expected to become manifoldlike under a suitable coarse-graining process. We use this broad range of distinct classes of causal sets as a testbed for observables. Rather than focusing on continuum-geometry inspired observables, such as curvature invariants, which often exhibit large fluctuations and are computationally very expensive, we focus on graph observables, including some observables that constitute subgraph statistics and some that are global. We find that three observables, namely the link degree distribution, the eigenvalues of the graph Laplacian of the symmetrized Hasse diagram and the recently proposed abundance of causal intervals, can distinguish between the distinct classes of causal sets. This is made possible by the small fluctuations that these observables have in most classes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that three graph observables—the link degree distribution, the eigenvalues of the graph Laplacian of the symmetrized Hasse diagram, and the abundance of causal intervals—can distinguish nine classes of causal sets (manifoldlike with inhomogeneous Ricci curvature, both topologically trivial and nontrivial; non-manifoldlike including lattices, layered orders, and Lorentzian quasicrystals; and classes expected to become manifoldlike under coarse-graining) because these observables exhibit small within-class fluctuations, in contrast to more expensive continuum-geometry observables.

Significance. If the distinguishing power is quantitatively verified and shown to be robust, the work offers a practical, computationally tractable route to charting causal-set configuration space using subgraph and global graph statistics. The breadth of the nine classes tested, including several not previously studied, is a positive feature that could help isolate which classes are viable for continuum recovery.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the three observables distinguish the classes via small fluctuations is stated without any quantitative data, error analysis, sampling protocol, or figures showing within-class variance versus inter-class separation, so the claim cannot be verified from the manuscript.
  2. [Main text (discussion of classes and observables)] The demonstration is performed only on finite-volume realizations of the nine classes; the manuscript does not test whether the reported small fluctuations and inter-class separation persist at substantially larger element counts or under the coarse-graining operations invoked for the final class of examples, which is load-bearing for the stated goal of mapping toward continuum recovery.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the positive assessment of the significance of our work and for the detailed comments that will help improve the manuscript. We respond to the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the three observables distinguish the classes via small fluctuations is stated without any quantitative data, error analysis, sampling protocol, or figures showing within-class variance versus inter-class separation, so the claim cannot be verified from the manuscript.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from additional quantitative context to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will expand the abstract to include brief quantitative indicators of within-class fluctuations (e.g., standard deviations across realizations) and inter-class separations, together with references to the relevant figures and a short description of the sampling protocol. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Main text (discussion of classes and observables)] The demonstration is performed only on finite-volume realizations of the nine classes; the manuscript does not test whether the reported small fluctuations and inter-class separation persist at substantially larger element counts or under the coarse-graining operations invoked for the final class of examples, which is load-bearing for the stated goal of mapping toward continuum recovery.

    Authors: The present study is restricted to finite-volume realizations in order to establish the distinguishing power of the three graph observables at computationally accessible scales. We acknowledge that verifying the persistence of the reported fluctuations and separations at substantially larger volumes and under explicit coarse-graining would strengthen the connection to continuum recovery. Such extensions are computationally demanding and lie outside the scope of the current work; we will add an explicit discussion of this limitation and of planned future investigations in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical distinction via direct computation on chosen classes

full rationale

The paper selects nine classes of causal sets, generates realizations, and computes three graph observables (link degree distribution, Laplacian eigenvalues of symmetrized Hasse diagram, causal interval abundance). It reports that small within-class fluctuations permit inter-class distinction. This is a direct empirical observation on finite samples, not a derivation, fit, or self-referential definition. No equations reduce the reported distinctions to inputs by construction, no parameters are fitted and then relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked to force the result. The central claim remains independent of the inputs and is self-contained as an observational survey.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no information on free parameters, background axioms, or new postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5750 in / 1019 out tokens · 25759 ms · 2026-06-29T15:24:27.090549+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    pants” topologies significantly reduce the number of links of a given element within one “pant leg

    Physical interpretation For the link matrix,d in andd out count immediate predecessors and successors. The link matrix probes local connectivity at the discreteness scale and is sensitive to local geometric as well as topological features and also boundary effects. This is reflected in the link degree distribution. Link-degree distributions are sensitive ...

  2. [2]

    spectrum

    Mathematical definition Given the causal intervalI[e i, ej] between any pair of elementse i ≺e j in a causal set, we can consider those intervals of cardinalitym, where we remind the reader that we defined the interval I[e i, ej] withe i ≺ ∗ej to have cardinality 2. We then define the interval abundance, also called “spectrum” in [27] for a causal setCwit...

  3. [3]

    nearest-neighbors

    Physical interpretation The interval abundance is a simple example of subgraph statistics, because it counts the relative abundance of sub-causal sets of a given size, which are selected due to their causality properties. Causal intervals are building blocks of the d’Alembertian in a causal set [61, 80], because they can be understood as collecting the “n...

    2048

  4. [4]

    Link-degree distribution We show how the link-degree distribution varies in Fig. 17. All three changes shift the maximum of the link distribution to larger values. Further, the distribution becomes less skewed. A change in the boundary type from a box-boundary to a causal-diamond boundary changes the relative number of elements close to the boundary and t...

  5. [5]

    Interval abundances We examine how the interval abundances vary in Fig. 18. We find that with our normalization, the interval abundances are largely size- and boundary-independent. The dimensionality, however, has a very strong imprint leading to many more small intervals and fewer large intervals. This effect can be clearly differentiated from the featur...

  6. [6]

    Graph-Laplacian eigenvalues We summarize how the graph-Laplacian eigenvalues vary in Fig. 19. The eigenvalues generally decrease with increasing causet size. This indicates that large causets have larger, more loosely connected subregions, and are less layered. While this reflects the natural inverse square scaling of the eigenvalues of geometric Laplacia...

    2048

  7. [7]

    Height profile We show how the height profile varies in Fig. 20. The causal-diamond height profile clearly has a different shape compared to a rectangular boundary, showing how sensitive the height profile is to boundary modifications. Besides, the height profile is shifted towards larger heights for larger linear extent in one dimensionn 1/d, and becomes...

    2048

  8. [8]

    Suppression of non-manifold-like sets in the causal set path integral,

    S. P. Loomis and S. Carlip, “Suppression of non-manifold-like sets in the causal set path integral,” Class.Quant.Grav.35(9, 2017)

    2017

  9. [9]

    Entropy and the link action in the causal set path-sum,

    A. Mathur, A. A. Singh, and S. Surya, “Entropy and the link action in the causal set path-sum,” Class.Quant.Grav.38(12, 2020)

    2020

  10. [10]

    Path integral suppression of badly behaved causal sets,

    P. Carlip, S. Carlip, and S. Surya, “Path integral suppression of badly behaved causal sets,”Class. Quant. Grav.40no. 8, (2023) 095004, arXiv:2209.00327 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    The Einstein–Hilbert action for entropically dominant causal sets,

    P. Carlip, S. Carlip, and S. Surya, “The Einstein–Hilbert action for entropically dominant causal sets,”Class. Quant. Grav.41no. 14, (2024) 145005, arXiv:2311.18238 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Causal sets and an emerging continuum,

    S. Carlip, “Causal sets and an emerging continuum,”Gen. Rel. Grav.56no. 8, (2024) 95, arXiv:2405.14059 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Evidence for a Phase Transition in 2D Causal Set Quantum Gravity

    S. Surya, “Evidence for a Phase Transition in 2D Causal Set Quantum Gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 132001, arXiv:1110.6244 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    Finite Size Scaling in 2d Causal Set Quantum Gravity

    L. Glaser, D. O’Connor, and S. Surya, “Finite size scaling in 2d causal set quantum gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.35no. 4, (2018) 045006, arXiv:1706.06432 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Dimensionally restricted causal set quantum gravity: examples in two and three dimensions,

    W. J. Cunningham and S. Surya, “Dimensionally restricted causal set quantum gravity: examples in two and three dimensions,”Class. Quant. Grav.37no. 5, (2020) 054002, arXiv:1908.11647 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Statistical geometry,

    J. Myrheim, “Statistical geometry,” tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, 1978

    1978

  17. [17]

    D. A. Meyer,The dimension of causal sets,The dimension of causal sets, 1988. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    1988

  18. [18]

    The manifold dimension of a causal set: Tests in conformally flat space-times,

    D. D. Reid, “The manifold dimension of a causal set: Tests in conformally flat space-times,” Phys.Rev.D67(1, 2003)

    2003

  19. [19]

    Spectral dimension in causal set quantum gravity,

    A. Eichhorn and S. Mizera, “Spectral dimension in causal set quantum gravity,”Class.Quant.Grav. 31(11, 2013)

    2013

  20. [20]

    Spectral dimension on spatial hypersurfaces in causal set quantum gravity,

    A. Eichhorn, S. Surya, and F. Versteegen, “Spectral dimension on spatial hypersurfaces in causal set quantum gravity,”Class.Quant.Grav.36(5, 2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    A Complete Set of Riemann Invariants,

    E. Zakhary and C. B. G. Mcintosh, “A Complete Set of Riemann Invariants,”Gen. Rel. Grav.29 no. 5, (1997) 539–581

    1997

  22. [22]

    The Scalar Curvature of a Causal Set

    D. M. T. Benincasa and F. Dowker, “The Scalar Curvature of a Causal Set,”Phys. Rev. Lett.104 (2010) 181301, arXiv:1001.2725 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    Higher-order curvature operators in causal set quantum gravity,

    G. P. de Brito, A. Eichhorn, and C. Pfeiffer, “Higher-order curvature operators in causal set quantum gravity,”Eur. Phys. J. Plus138no. 7, (2023) 592, arXiv:2301.13525 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Science 298, 5594 (2002), 824–827

    R. Milo,et al., “Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks,”Science298 no. 5594, (2002) 824–827, https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.298.5594.824

    work page doi:10.1126/science.298.5594.824 2002

  25. [25]

    A survey on graph kernels,

    N. M. Kriege, F. D. Johansson, and C. Morris, “A survey on graph kernels,”Applied Network Science5no. 1, (2020) 6, arXiv:1903.11835 [cs.LG]. 58

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    QuantumGrav,

    K. T. Le, H. Mack, and F. Wagner, “QuantumGrav,”.https://github.com/ssciwr/QuantumGrav. GitHub repository, 2026

    2026

  27. [27]

    CausalSetZoology,

    F. Wagner, “CausalSetZoology,”.https://github.com/causal-wagner/CausalSetZoology. GitHub repository, 2026

    2026

  28. [28]

    CausalSets.jl: A package for numerical simulations of the causal set approach to quantum gravity.,

    V. A. Hollmeier, “CausalSets.jl: A package for numerical simulations of the causal set approach to quantum gravity.,”.https://codeberg.org/cyclopentane/CausalSets.jl. Codeberg repository, 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    Onset of the Asymptotic Regime for Finite Orders

    J. Henson, D. P. Rideout, R. D. Sorkin, and S. Surya, “Onset of the Asymptotic Regime for Finite Orders,” arXiv:1504.05902 [math.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Asymptotic enumeration of partial orders on a finite set,

    D. J. Kleitman and B. L. Rothschild, “Asymptotic enumeration of partial orders on a finite set,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society205(1975) 205–220

    1975

  31. [31]

    Asymptotic enumeration of partially ordered sets,

    D. Dhar, “Asymptotic enumeration of partially ordered sets,”Pacific Journal of Mathematics90 no. 2, (1980) 299–305

    1980

  32. [32]

    Phase transitions in the evolution of partial orders,

    H. J. Pr¨ omel, A. Steger, and A. Taraz, “Phase transitions in the evolution of partial orders,”Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A94(2001) 230–275

    2001

  33. [33]

    Statistical Lorentzian geometry and the closeness of Lorentzian manifolds

    L. Bombelli, “Statistical Lorentzian geometry and the closeness of Lorentzian manifolds,”J. Math. Phys.41(2000) 6944–6958, arXiv:gr-qc/0002053

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  34. [34]

    Closeness function on coarse grained Lorentzian geometries,

    S. Surya, “Closeness function on coarse grained Lorentzian geometries,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 2, (2026) 024034, arXiv:2510.19403 [gr-qc]. [28]H.E.S.S.Collaboration, A. Abramowskiet al., “Search for Lorentz Invariance breaking with a likelihood fit of the PKS 2155-304 Flare Data Taken on MJD 53944,”Astropart. Phys.34(2011) 738–747, arXiv:1101.3650 [astro-ph.HE...

    work page arXiv 2026

  35. [35]

    Space-Time as a Causal Set,

    L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer, and R. Sorkin, “Space-Time as a Causal Set,”Phys. Rev. Lett.59 (1987) 521–524

    1987

  36. [36]

    Discreteness without symmetry breaking: a theorem

    L. Bombelli, J. Henson, and R. D. Sorkin, “Discreteness without symmetry breaking: A Theorem,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A24(2009) 2579–2587, arXiv:gr-qc/0605006. 59

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [37]

    J. P. Boyd,Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods. Dover Books on Mathematics. Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, second ed., 2001

    2001

  38. [38]

    Onset of the Asymptotic Regime for (Uniformly Random) Finite Orders,

    J. Henson, D. Rideout, R. D. Sorkin, and S. Surya, “Onset of the Asymptotic Regime for (Uniformly Random) Finite Orders,”Exper. Math.26no. 3, (2016) 253–266

    2016

  39. [39]

    Spacetime Quasicrystals,

    L. Boyle and S. Mygdalas, “Spacetime Quasicrystals,” arXiv:2601.07769 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    The role of aesthetics in pure and applied mathematical research,

    R. Penrose, “The role of aesthetics in pure and applied mathematical research,”Bull.Inst.Math.Appl. 10(1974) 266–271

    1974

  41. [41]

    Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry,

    D. Shechtman, I. Blech, D. Gratias, and J. W. Cahn, “Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry,”Phys. Rev. Lett.53(Nov, 1984) 1951–1953

    1984

  42. [42]

    Quasicrystals: A new class of ordered structures,

    D. Levine and P. J. Steinhardt, “Quasicrystals: A new class of ordered structures,”Physical Review Letters53(1984) 2477–2480

    1984

  43. [43]

    Gr¨ unbaum and G

    B. Gr¨ unbaum and G. C. Shephard,Tilings and patterns. Courier Dover Publications, 1987

    1987

  44. [44]

    A guide to mathematical quasicrystals

    M. Baake,A Guide to Mathematical Quasicrystals, pp. 17–48. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002. arXiv:math-ph/9901014 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    Quasiperiodic patterns,

    M. Duneau and A. Katz, “Quasiperiodic patterns,”Phys. Rev. Lett.54(Jun, 1985) 2688–2691

    1985

  46. [46]

    The diffraction pattern of projected structures,

    V. Elser, “The diffraction pattern of projected structures,”Acta Crystallographica Section A42 no. 1, (1986) 36–43, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1107/S0108767386099932

    work page doi:10.1107/s0108767386099932 1986

  47. [47]

    Baake and U

    M. Baake and U. Grimm,Aperiodic Order. Volume 1: A Mathematical Invitation. Cambridge University Press, 2013

    2013

  48. [48]

    Diffraction of stochastic point sets: Explicitly computable examples

    M. Baake, M. Birkner, and R. V. Moody, “Diffraction of stochastic point sets: Explicitly computable examples,”Communications in Mathematical Physics293no. 3, (2010) 611–660, arXiv:0803.1266 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  49. [49]

    Hyperuniformity and non-hyperuniformity of quasicrystals,

    M. Bj¨ orklund and T. Hartnick, “Hyperuniformity and non-hyperuniformity of quasicrystals,”arXiv e-prints(Oct., 2022) arXiv:2210.02151, arXiv:2210.02151 [math-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Stable Homology as an Indicator of Manifoldlikeness in Causal Set Theory

    S. Major, D. Rideout, and S. Surya, “Stable Homology as an Indicator of Manifoldlikeness in Causal Set Theory,”Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 175008, arXiv:0902.0434 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  51. [51]

    Exploring Quantum Spacetime with Topological Data Analysis,

    J. van der Duin, R. Loll, M. Schiffer, and A. Silva, “Exploring Quantum Spacetime with Topological Data Analysis,” arXiv:2510.05693 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    Quantum gravity and effective topology,

    J. van der Duin, R. Loll, M. Schiffer, and A. Silva, “Quantum gravity and effective topology,”Eur. Phys. J. C86no. 2, (2026) 102, arXiv:2510.05695 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    Towards coarse graining of discrete Lorentzian quantum gravity

    A. Eichhorn, “Towards coarse graining of discrete Lorentzian quantum gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav. 35no. 4, (2018) 044001, arXiv:1709.10419 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Dimensional reduction in causal set gravity,

    S. Carlip, “Dimensional reduction in causal set gravity,”

  55. [55]

    Dimensional reduction in manifold-like causal sets,

    J. Abajian and S. Carlip, “Dimensional reduction in manifold-like causal sets,”Phys.Rev.D97(10,

  56. [56]

    Echoes of asymptotic silence in causal set quantum gravity,

    A. Eichhorn, S. Mizera, and S. Surya, “Echoes of asymptotic silence in causal set quantum gravity,” Class.Quant.Grav.34(3, 2017) . 60

    2017

  57. [57]

    Estimating the manifold dimension of causal sets,

    F. Ashmead and D. D. Reid, “Estimating the manifold dimension of causal sets,”Handbook of Quantum Gravity(2024) 1–21

    2024

  58. [58]

    The random discrete action for 2-dimensional spacetime,

    D. M. T. Benincasa, F. Dowker, and B. Schmitzer, “The random discrete action for 2-dimensional spacetime,”Class.Quant.Grav.28(11, 2010)

    2010

  59. [59]

    Discrete geometry of a small causal diamond,

    M. Roy, D. Sinha, and S. Surya, “Discrete geometry of a small causal diamond,”Phys.Rev.D87(2,

  60. [60]

    Particle propagators on discrete spacetime,

    S. Johnston, “Particle propagators on discrete spacetime,”Class.Quant.Grav.25(10, 2008)

    2008

  61. [61]

    Scalar field theory on a causal set in histories form,

    R. D. Sorkin, “Scalar field theory on a causal set in histories form,”J.Phys.Conf.Ser.306(2011)

    2011

  62. [62]

    Causal set d’alembertians for various dimensions,

    F. Dowker and L. Glaser, “Causal set d’alembertians for various dimensions,”Class.Quant.Grav.30 (10, 2013)

    2013

  63. [63]

    A closed form expression for the causal set d’alembertian,

    L. Glaser, “A closed form expression for the causal set d’alembertian,”Class.Quant.Grav.31(5,

  64. [64]

    Generalized causal set d‘alembertians,

    S. Aslanbeigi, M. Saravani, and R. D. Sorkin, “Generalized causal set d‘alembertians,”JHEP06 (2014) 024

    2014

  65. [65]

    Correction terms for propagators and d’alembertians due to spacetime discreteness,

    S. Johnston, “Correction terms for propagators and d’alembertians due to spacetime discreteness,” Class.Quant.Grav.32(9, 2015)

    2015

  66. [66]

    The continuum limit of a 4-dimensional causal set scalar d’alembertian,

    A. Belenchia, D. M. Benincasa, and F. Dowker, “The continuum limit of a 4-dimensional causal set scalar d’alembertian,”Class.Quant.Grav.33(12, 2016)

    2016

  67. [67]

    Towards spectral geometry for causal sets,

    Y. K. Yazdi and A. Kempf, “Towards spectral geometry for causal sets,”Class.Quant.Grav.34(3,

  68. [68]

    Scalar field green functions on causal sets,

    S. N. Ahmed, F. Dowker, and S. Surya, “Scalar field green functions on causal sets,” Class.Quant.Grav.34(5, 2017)

    2017

  69. [69]

    Combinatorial interpretation of the coefficients of the causal set d’alembertian,

    K. Yeats, “Combinatorial interpretation of the coefficients of the causal set d’alembertian,”Classical and Quantum Gravity42(3, 2025) 145003

    2025

  70. [70]

    Local d’alembertian for causal sets,

    M. Bogu˜ n´ a and D. Krioukov, “Local d’alembertian for causal sets,”

  71. [71]

    Retarded causal set propagator in 2d anti de-sitter spacetime,

    A. Kastrati and H. Hinrichsen, “Retarded causal set propagator in 2d anti de-sitter spacetime,”

  72. [72]

    On recovering continuum topology from a causal set,

    S. Major, D. Rideout, and S. Surya, “On recovering continuum topology from a causal set,” J.Math.Phys.48(2007)

    2007

  73. [73]

    Causal set topology,

    S. Surya, “Causal set topology,”Theor.Comput.Sci.405(10, 2008) 188–197

    2008

  74. [74]

    Path length distribution in two-dimensional causal sets,

    M. Aghili, L. Bombelli, and B. B. Pilgrim, “Path length distribution in two-dimensional causal sets,” Eur.Phys.J.C78(9, 2018) 744

    2018

  75. [75]

    Manifold properties from causal sets using chains,

    J. Kambor and X. Nomaan, “Manifold properties from causal sets using chains,”Class.Quant.Grav. 38(1, 2020)

    2020

  76. [76]

    On the continuum limit of benincasa-dowker-glaser causal set action,

    L. Machet and J. Wang, “On the continuum limit of benincasa-dowker-glaser causal set action,” Class.Quant.Grav.38(7, 2020)

    2020

  77. [77]

    Boundary contributions in the causal set action,

    F. Dowker, “Boundary contributions in the causal set action,”Gen.Rel.Grav.38(4, 2021)

    2021

  78. [78]

    Local structure of sprinkled causal sets,

    C. J. Fewster, E. Hawkins, C. Minz, and K. Rejzner, “Local structure of sprinkled causal sets,” 61 Phys.Rev.D103(4, 2021)

    2021

  79. [79]

    Benincasa-dowker causal set actions by quantum counting,

    S. A. Adamson and P. Wallden, “Benincasa-dowker causal set actions by quantum counting,”

  80. [80]

    The causal set approach to quantum gravity,

    S. Surya, “The causal set approach to quantum gravity,”Living Rev. Rel.22no. 1, (2019) 5, arXiv:1903.11544 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

Showing first 80 references.