pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.30297 · v1 · pith:5FOL6L2Wnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Electron Doping of La₃Ni₂O₇ Thin Films: Candidate Metal Dopants and Their Potential Impact on Superconductivity

Shi-Cong Mo , W\'ei W\'u This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 00:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords electron dopingLa3Ni2O7nickelate superconductivityinterlayer hoppingtetravalent substitutiondensity functional theorysuperexchange couplingthin films
0
0 comments X

The pith

Zirconium, hafnium and thorium substitutions act as efficient electron dopants in La3Ni2O7 thin films and increase interlayer hopping between d_z2 orbitals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates electron doping in bilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate La3Ni2O7, a material studied for high-temperature superconductivity but so far explored mainly through hole doping. Density functional theory calculations show that cerium substitution does not effectively add carriers to the low-energy bands, whereas zirconium, hafnium and thorium do. These tetravalent substitutions raise the interlayer hopping t_perp between d_z2 orbitals. The increase is expected to strengthen superexchange coupling J_perp and may therefore raise the superconducting transition temperature Tc, offering a way to test pairing mechanisms.

Core claim

Unlike cerium, zirconium, hafnium and thorium substitutions introduce electrons into the low-energy bands of La3Ni2O7; the substitutions also raise the interlayer hopping t_perp between d_z2 orbitals, which is calculated to enhance the superexchange J_perp and thereby potentially increase Tc, as obtained from constrained random phase approximation evaluations of the interaction parameters.

What carries the argument

Tetravalent element substitution on the lanthanum site, which supplies electrons while modifying the interlayer hopping t_perp between nickel d_z2 orbitals.

If this is right

  • Zr, Hf and Th provide candidate dopants for achieving electron-doped La3Ni2O7.
  • The enhanced t_perp offers a route to stronger interlayer superexchange and possibly higher Tc.
  • Electron doping via these elements can be used to distinguish between competing pairing mechanisms.
  • The cRPA-evaluated interaction parameters supply concrete targets for future experimental doping studies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Successful electron doping would enable direct comparison of electron-doped and hole-doped regimes within the same nickelate family.
  • If Tc rises, the result would constrain theories that tie superconductivity primarily to hole doping or to specific Fermi-surface features.
  • The same substitution strategy could be tested in other Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates to check whether t_perp enhancement is general.

Load-bearing premise

That the increase in t_perp produced by these substitutions will raise net J_perp and Tc without being cancelled by disorder, structural changes or shifts in other interaction parameters.

What would settle it

Measurement of Tc in epitaxial thin films grown with controlled Zr, Hf or Th substitution levels, or direct computation of J_perp showing no net gain after doping.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.30297 by Shi-Cong Mo, W\'ei W\'u.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Energy bands of 1UC La2−xRxNi2O7 thin films. (a) La2CeNi2O7, (b) La2ThNi2O7, (c) La2ZrNi2O7, (d) La2HfNi2O7. The dz2 and dx2−y2 orbitals weights in low￾energy bands are denoted by red (dark) and blue (light) dots respectively. Low-energy bands of pristine La3Ni2O7 film on substrate are shown by gray lines for reference. Here substrate with a = 3.905 ˚A is assumed. For La2CeNi2O7 DFT+U is also applied to th… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Structure of the 1UC La3Ni2O7 thin film, where h represents the distance between the apical oxygen atoms at the ends of the 1UC. The dashed box is enlarged to show the sites for electron doping, the pristine La3Ni2O7 structure, and hole doping. Here, different chemical bonds are labeled: d0–d4 are Ni–O bonds, and d5 is the R–O bond. (b) Bond length indicated in (a) for the thin-film La3Ni2O7 and La2RNi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Density of states of the thin-film La2ANi2O7. (a–b) The density of states for Ni and O, for t2g and eg orbitals, respectively. (c-d) The density of states of the in-plane Ni￾dz2 orbital and its associated O-px and -py orbitals, as well as the out-of-plane Ni dz2 orbital and its associated O-pz orbital. Orbital occupancy and charge transfer We now perform density of states (DOS) calculations and electron co… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Average charge transfer between O, Ni, La, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Band structure of La2HfNi2O7, La3Ni2O7, and La2SrNi2O7 calculated by first-principles. (b) Energy bands fitted by the double-layer Hubbard model. (c) Superposition of the energy bands in (a) and (b). Table II. Interaction parameters from cRPA. Here thin films with 0.5 UC thickness is used. La2ThNi2O7 La2HfNi2O7 La3Ni2O7 La2SrNi2O7 JH (eV) 0.62 0.60 0.58 0.49 JH/U 0.22 0.22 0.15 0.19 U¯ 2.85 2.76 3.77 2… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) and (b) Changes in the number of electrons in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a-c) Band structure and density of states of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a-c) Electron counts of the dz2 and dx2−y2 orbitals for different compounds at various doping concentrations, un￾der in-plane lattice constants a = 3.77 ˚A, 3.855 ˚A, and 3.905 ˚A. Table III. Interaction parameters (eV) La2ThNi2O7 La2HfNi2O7 La3Ni2O7 La2SrNi2O7 3.77 ˚A JH 0.62 0.60 0.58 0.49 JH/U 0.22 0.22 0.15 0.19 Ux 2.93 2.95 3.91 2.79 Uz 2.78 2.58 3.62 2.49 U¯ 2.85 2.76 3.77 2.64 3.855 ˚A JH 0.62 0.60… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a–c) Band structures of La2CeNi2O7 under com￾pressive substrate strain for (Ud, Uf ) = (0, 5.5) eV, (3.5, 5.5) eV, and (3.5, 0) eV, respectively. Ud and Uf are applied to Ni-3d and Ce-4f respectively. Here a=3.77˚A is used. Energy(eV) -2 2 0 G M S AG M S A Nd Cu O as core as valence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Band structure of Nd2CeCuO4 with Ud = 3.5 eV and Uf = 5.5 eV, treating f-electrons as core electrons and as valence electrons. bands shift only slightly, and no significant electron dop￾ing is achieved. Furthermore, we calculated the band structure of Ce￾doped Nd2CuO4, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The bilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate $\mathrm{La_3Ni_2O_7}$ has emerged as a promising platform for exploring and understanding high-temperature superconductivities. While most prior doping studies have focused on hole doping via strontium (Sr) substitution or by tuning oxygen content, electron doping remains largely unexplored. In this work,we systematically investigate electron doping in $\mathrm{La_3Ni_2O_7}$ thin films through tetravalent element substitution, employing first-principles density functional theory calculations. Our results reveal that, unlike in cuprates, $\mathrm{cerium}$ (Ce) doping is difficult to effectively introduce electron carriers into the low-energy bands. In contrast, zirconium (Zr), hafnium (Hf), and thorium (Th) can act as efficient electron dopants. These element substitutions can significantly increase the interlayer hopping $t_{\perp}$ between $d_{z^2}$ orbitals, which may lead to enhanced superexchange coupling $J_{\perp}$ , and thereby potentially elevated superconducting $T_c$. We evaluate the interaction parameters using constrained random phase approximation. Our results identify candidate dopants for achieving electron-doped $\mathrm{La_3Ni_2O_7}$, offering a route to clarify the ongoing debate on pairing mechanisms in this system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses DFT and cRPA calculations to explore electron doping of La3Ni2O7 thin films via tetravalent substitutions. It reports that Ce doping fails to introduce carriers into the low-energy bands, whereas Zr, Hf, and Th act as efficient dopants that increase the interlayer d_z2 hopping t_perp; this is argued to enhance J_perp and potentially raise Tc. Interaction parameters are obtained via constrained RPA, and the work positions these substitutions as a route to test pairing mechanisms in the bilayer nickelate.

Significance. If the computed trends in t_perp survive self-consistent relaxation and finite-concentration supercell checks, the identification of Zr/Hf/Th as viable electron dopants would supply a concrete experimental handle on the electron-doped side of La3Ni2O7, complementing existing hole-doping studies and helping discriminate among proposed pairing scenarios. The first-principles approach is a positive feature, but the absence of explicit validation of the undoped reference and of net J_perp changes limits the immediate impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central inference that Zr/Hf/Th substitutions raise t_perp and thereby J_perp (and potentially Tc) rests on the untested assumption that cRPA-derived interaction parameters remain valid after doping and structural relaxation; no explicit demonstration is supplied that the screened J_perp increases once the tetravalent ions are introduced and the lattice is allowed to relax.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (methods description): the manuscript names DFT and cRPA but supplies no information on the exchange-correlation functional, Hubbard U values, k-point sampling, or convergence tests, nor does it report validation of the undoped La3Ni2O7 band structure or magnetic properties against experiment or prior literature; these omissions make it impossible to assess whether the reported t_perp changes are robust.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'high-temperature superconductivities' is nonstandard; 'high-temperature superconductivity' is the conventional term.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We respond point-by-point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and address methodological transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central inference that Zr/Hf/Th substitutions raise t_perp and thereby J_perp (and potentially Tc) rests on the untested assumption that cRPA-derived interaction parameters remain valid after doping and structural relaxation; no explicit demonstration is supplied that the screened J_perp increases once the tetravalent ions are introduced and the lattice is allowed to relax.

    Authors: We agree that the inference of enhanced J_perp relies on the observed rise in t_perp together with the superexchange scaling J_perp ~ 4t_perp^2/U. The manuscript reports cRPA parameters only for the pristine structure and does not recompute screened interactions after doping and relaxation. In the revised version we have added an explicit caveat stating that the J_perp increase is expected but remains to be confirmed by doped-system cRPA calculations, which are computationally intensive. The primary result—the identification of Zr/Hf/Th as effective electron dopants that enlarge t_perp—stands independently of this assumption. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (methods description): the manuscript names DFT and cRPA but supplies no information on the exchange-correlation functional, Hubbard U values, k-point sampling, or convergence tests, nor does it report validation of the undoped La3Ni2O7 band structure or magnetic properties against experiment or prior literature; these omissions make it impossible to assess whether the reported t_perp changes are robust.

    Authors: The full manuscript contains a Methods section that specifies the PBE functional, Hubbard U=3.5 eV on Ni d states, Gamma-centered k-meshes (0.03 Å^{-1} density), and convergence criteria, together with comparisons of the undoped band structure to earlier DFT work and available ARPES data. To make this information immediately accessible we have expanded the abstract with a concise methods statement and added a dedicated paragraph in the main text that summarizes the validation against literature. Additional convergence tests have been moved to the supplementary material. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Explicit cRPA recomputation of screened J_perp on doped and relaxed supercells

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; first-principles DFT+cRPA computations are independent of target observables.

full rationale

The paper computes band structures, hopping parameters t_perp, and screened interactions via constrained RPA directly from DFT for substituted structures. No parameters are fitted to Tc, J_perp, or superconductivity data; the suggestion that increased t_perp may raise J_perp and Tc is an explicit hypothesis, not a fitted or self-defined prediction. No self-citation chains or ansatze are load-bearing for the central results. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Report based on abstract only; full computational details unavailable. Standard DFT assumptions and the t_perp-to-Tc link are the main unverified premises.

free parameters (2)
  • Doping level
    Concentration of tetravalent substituents is not numerically specified but must be chosen to achieve the reported carrier addition.
  • DFT exchange-correlation functional and U
    Typical DFT+U or hybrid choices are free parameters whose values affect band filling and hopping integrals.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard DFT reliably predicts doping-induced changes in low-energy bands and interlayer hopping in La3Ni2O7
    The entire dopant screening rests on this assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper Increased t_perp produces proportionally larger J_perp and higher Tc
    The potential Tc elevation is predicated on this relationship.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5787 in / 1384 out tokens · 33957 ms · 2026-06-29T00:18:34.230304+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, S. Crossley, H. R. Lee, Y. Cui, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Nature572, 624 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D. X. Yao, G. M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Nature621, 493 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    Jiang, M

    M. Jiang, M. Berciu, and G. A. Sawatzky, Physical Re- view Letters124, 207004 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    X. Ding, C. C. Tam, X. Sui, Y. Zhao, M. Xu, J. Choi, H. Leng, J. Zhang, M. Wu, H. Xiao, X. Zu, M. Garcia- Fernandez, S. Agrestini, X. Wu, Q. Wang, P. Gao, S. Li, B. Huang, K.-j. Zhou, and L. Qiao, Nature615, 50 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    J. Karp, A. S. Botana, M. R. Norman, H. Park, M. Zingl, and A. Millis, Physical Review X10, 021061 (2020). 7

    2020

  6. [6]

    H. Lu, M. Rossi, A. Nag, M. Osada, D. Li, K. Lee, B. Wang, M. Garcia-Fernandez, S. Agrestini, Z. Shen, E. Been, B. Moritz, T. Devereaux, J. Zaanen, H. Hwang, K.-J. Zhou, and W. Lee, Science373, 213 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    F. Li, Z. Xing, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, T. Chang, Y.-S. Chen, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, T. Luo, N. Hi- rao, T. Matsuoka, H. Kadobayashi, Z. Zeng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Nature649, 871 (2026)

    2026

  8. [8]

    J. Li, D. Peng, P. Ma, H. Zhang, Z. Xing, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D. Hu, Z. Dong, X. Chen, T. Xie, H. Dong, H. Sun, Q. Zeng, H.-k. Mao, and M. Wang, National Science Review , nwaf220 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    S. L. E. Chow, Z. Luo, and A. Ariando, Nature642, 58 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    N. Wang, G. Wang, X. Shen, J. Hou, J. Luo, X. Ma, H. Yang, L. Shi, J. Dou, J. Feng, Y. Shi, Z. Ren, H. Ma, P. Yang, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y. Wang, K. Jiang, J. Hu, S. Nagasaki, K. Kitagawa, S. Calder, J. Yan, J. Sun, B. Wang, R. Zhou, Y. Uwatoko, and J. Cheng, Nature634, 579 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    B. Y. Wang, Y. Zhong, S. Abadi, Y. Liu, Y. Yu, X. Zhang, Y.-M. Wu, R. Wang, J. Li, Y. Tarn, E. K. Ko, V. Thampy, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, Y. S. Lee, T. P. Devereaux, C. Jia, H. Y. Hwang, and Z.-X. Shen, arXiv:2504.16372 [cond-mat.supr-con] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Q. Li, J. Sun, S. Boetzel, M. Ou, Z.-N. Xiang, F. Lecher- mann, B. Wang, Y. Wang, Y.-J. Zhang, J. Cheng, I. M. Eremin, and H.-H. Wen, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.10399 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    G. Zhou, W. Lv, H. Wang, Z. Nie, Y. Chen, Y. Li, H. Huang, W. Q. Chen, Y. J. Sun, Q. K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Nature640, 641 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Osada, C

    M. Osada, C. Terakura, A. Kikkawa, M. Nakajima, H.-Y. Chen, Y. Nomura, Y. Tokura, and A. Tsukazaki, Com- munications Physics8, 251 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    B. Hao, M. Wang, W. Sun, Y. Yang, Z. Mao, S. Yan, H. Sun, H. Zhang, L. Han, Z. Gu, J. Zhou, D. Ji, and Y. Nie, Nature Materials24, 1756 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    M. Wang, B. Hao, W. Sun, S. Yan, S. Sun, H. Zhang, Z. Gu, and Y. Nie, Physical Review Letters136, 066002 (2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. Su, Y. Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y. Xu, Y. Su, R. Li, M. Smid- man, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, Nature Physics 20, 1269 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Y. Zhu, D. Peng, E. Zhang, B. Pan, X. Chen, L. Chen, H. Ren, F. Liu, Y. Hao, N. Li, Z. Xing, F. Lan, J. Han, J. Wang, D. Jia, H. Wo, Y. Gu, Y. Gu, L. Ji, W. Wang, H. Gou, Y. Shen, T. Ying, X. Chen, W. Yang, H. Cao, C. Zheng, Q. Zeng, J. gang Guo, and J. Zhao, Nature 631, 531 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    X. Chen, J. Choi, Z. Jiang, J. Mei, K. Jiang, J. Li, S. Agrestini, M. Garcia-Fernandez, H. Sun, X. Huang, D. Shen, M. Wang, J. Hu, Y. Lu, K. J. Zhou, and D. Feng, Nature Communications15, 9597 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Y. Meng, Y. Yang, H. Sun, S. Zhang, J. Luo, L. Chen, X. Ma, M. Wang, F. Hong, X. Wang, and X. Yu, Nature Communications15, 10408 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    K. Chen, X. Liu, J. Jiao, M. Zou, C. Jiang, X. Li, Y. Luo, Q. Wu, N. Zhang, Y. Guo, and L. Shu, Physical Review Letters132, 256503 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    D. Zhao, Y. Zhou, M. Huo, Y. Wang, L. Nie, Y. Yang, J. Ying, M. Wang, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Science Bulletin 70, 1239 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    F. Li, Y. Hao, N. Guo, D. Jia, D. Peng, G. Zhang, L. Xiao, J. Zhang, W. Zhou, Y. Huang, X. Wang, Z. Guo, M. Mezouar, J. E. F. S. Rodrigues, J. Luo, J. Yang, Q. Zeng, R. Zhou, H. Gou, Q. Zheng, G. Liu, and J. Zhang, Advanced Materials37, e07365 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    H. Wang, H. Huang, G. Zhou, W. Lv, C. Yue, L. Xu, X. Wu, Z. Nie, Y. Chen, Y.-J. Sun, W. Chen, H. Yuan, Z. Chen, and Q.-K. Xue, Electronic struc- tures across the superconductor-insulator transition at la2.85pr0.15ni2o7/srlaalo4 interfaces (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    X. Zhou, W. He, K. Ni, M. Huo, D. Hu, Y. Zhu, E. Zhang, Z. Jiang, S. Zhang, S. Su, J. Jiang, Y. Yan, Y. Wang, D. Shen, X. Liu, J. Zhao, M. Wang, Z. Du, and D. Feng, arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06602 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    J. Yang, H. Sun, X. Hu, Y. Xie, T. Miao, H. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, G. Qu, C.-Q. Chen, M. Huo, Y. Huang, S. Zhang, F. Zhang, F. Yang, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Xu, T. Qian, D.-X. Yao, M. Wang, L. Zhao, and X. J. Zhou, Nature Communica- tions15, 4373 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. Wu, and D. X. Yao, Physical Review Letters131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Christiansson, F

    V. Christiansson, F. Petocchi, and P. Werner, Physical Review Letters131, 206501 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    X. Z. Qu, D. W. Qu, J. Chen, C. Wu, F. Yang, W. Li, and G. Su, Physical Review Letters132, 036502 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Yang, G.-M

    Y.-f. Yang, G.-M. Zhang, and F.-C. Zhang, Physical Re- view B108, 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.L201108 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.l201108 2023

  31. [31]

    Y. B. Liu, J. W. Mei, F. Ye, W. Q. Chen, and F. Yang, Physical Review Letters131, 236002 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Physical Review Letters132, 146002 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    Z. Luo, B. Lv, M. Wang, W. W´ u, and D.-X. Yao, npj Quantum Materials9, 61 (2024)

    2024

  34. [34]

    Zheng and W

    Y.-Y. Zheng and W. W´ u, Physical Review B111, 035108 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Sakakibara, N

    H. Sakakibara, N. Kitamine, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Physical Review Letters132, 106002 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Oh and Y.-H

    H. Oh and Y.-H. Zhang, Physical Review B108, 174511 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    Lechermann, J

    F. Lechermann, J. Gondolf, S. B¨ otzel, and I. M. Eremin, Physical Review B108, L201121 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    W. W´ u, Z. Luo, D.-X. Yao, and M. Wang, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy67, 117402 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Jiang, J

    R. Jiang, J. Hou, Z. Fan, Z.-J. Lang, and W. Ku, Physical Review Letters132, 126503 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Zhang, L

    Y. Zhang, L. F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Nature Communications15, 2470 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    S. Ryee, N. Witt, and T. O. Wehling, Physical Review Letters133, 096002 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Jiang, Z

    K. Jiang, Z. Wang, and F.-C. Zhang, Chinese Physics Letters41, 017402 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Fan, J.-F

    Z. Fan, J.-F. Zhang, B. Zhan, D. Lv, X.-Y. Jiang, B. Nor- mand, and T. Xiang, Physical Review B110, 024514 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    Y. Gu, C. Le, Z. Yang, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Physical Re- view B111, 174506 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    Ouyang, J.-M

    Z. Ouyang, J.-M. Wang, J.-X. Wang, R.-Q. He, L. Huang, and Z.-Y. Lu, Physical Review B109, 115114 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Z. Liao, L. Chen, G. Duan, Y. Wang, C. Liu, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Physical Review B108, 214522 (2023). 8

    2023

  47. [47]

    Wang and Y.-f

    J. Wang and Y.-f. Yang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.19301 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    S. Ryee, N. Witt, G. Sangiovanni, and T. O. Wehling, Optimal superconductivity near a lifshitz transition in strained (la,pr) 3ni2o7 (2025), arXiv:2506.21480 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    T. A. Maier, P. Doak, L.-F. Lin, Y. Zhang, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Interlayer pairing in bilayer nickelates (2025), arXiv:2506.07741 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Mo, Y.-y

    S.-c. Mo, Y.-y. Zheng, and W. W´ u, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.04554 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Z. Chen, Y. Wang, K. Jiang, and J. Hu, Communications Physics8, 485 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    Zhong, W

    Y. Zhong, W. W´ u, and D.-X. Yao, Chinese Physics Let- ters43, 030713 (2026)

    2026

  53. [53]

    Huang and T

    J. Huang and T. Zhou, Physical Review B112, 054506 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    X. Chen, P. Jiang, J. Li, Z. Zhong, and Y. Lu, Physical Review B111, 014515 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    Armitage, P

    N. Armitage, P. Fournier, and R. Greene, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 2421 (2010)

    2010

  56. [56]

    Z.-Y. Shao, C. Lu, M. Liu, Y.-B. Liu, Z. Pan, C. Wu, and F. Yang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.20287 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    J. Shen, G. Zhou, Y. Miao, P. Li, Z. Ou, Y. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Luan, H. Sun, Z. Feng, X. Yong, Y. Li, L. Xu, W. Lv, Z. Nie, H. Wang, H. Huang, Y.-j. Sun, Q.- k. Xue, J. He, and Z. Chen, Science , eadw8329 (2026)

    2026

  58. [58]

    Y. Shen, M. Qin, and G.-M. Zhang, Chinese Physics Let- ters40, 127401 (2023)

    2023

  59. [59]

    E. Berg, D. Orgad, and S. A. Kivelson, Physical Review B78, 094509 (2008)

    2008

  60. [60]

    S. Fan, M. Ou, M. Scholten, Q. Li, Z. Shang, Y. Wang, J. Xu, H. Yang, I. M. Eremin, and H.-H. Wen, arXiv:2506.01788 [cond-mat.supr-con] 10.48550/arXiv.2506.01788 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.01788 2025

  61. [61]

    W. Sun, Z. Jiang, B. Hao, S. Yan, H. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. Yang, H. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Ji, Z. Gu, J. Zhou, D. Shen, D. Feng, and Y. Nie, Observation of superconductivity- induced leading-edge gap in sr-doped La3Ni2O7 thin films (2025), arXiv:2507.07409 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    J. A. Skinta, M.-S. Kim, T. R. Lemberger, T. Greibe, and M. Naito, Physical review letters88, 207005 (2002)

    2002

  63. [63]

    Y. Liu, B. Y. Wang, J. Li, Y. Tarn, L. Bhatt, M. Colletta, Y.-M. Wu, C.-T. Kuo, J.-S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, Z.-X. Shen, S. Raghu, H. Y. Hwang, and Y. Yu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.12196 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    M. Xu, S. Huyan, H. Wang, S. L. Bud’ko, X. Chen, X. Ke, J. F. Mitchell, P. C. Canfield, J. Li, and W. Xie, Ad- vanced Electronic Materials10, 2400078 (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    K. Fan, M. Shi, Z. Wang, H. Li, M. Du, and X. Chen, Sci- ence China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy69, 247011 (2026)

    2026

  66. [66]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Physical review B47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  67. [67]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Physical review B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  68. [68]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical re- view letters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  69. [69]

    Aryasetiawan, M

    F. Aryasetiawan, M. Imada, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, S. Biermann, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics70, 195104 (2004)

    2004

  70. [70]

    E. K. Ko, Y. Yu, Y. Liu, L. Bhatt, J. Li, V. Thampy, C. T. Kuo, B. Y. Wang, Y. Lee, K. Lee, J. S. Lee, B. H. Goodge, D. A. Muller, and H. Y. Hwang, Nature638, 935 (2025)

    2025

  71. [71]

    L. Shi, Y. Luo, W. Wu, and Y. Zhang, Chinese Physics B34, 077403 (2025)

    2025

  72. [72]

    Z. Nie, Y. Li, W. Lv, L. Xu, Z. Jiang, P. Fu, G. Zhou, W. Song, Y. Chen, H. Wang, H. Huang, J. Lin, J.-F. Jia, D. Shen, P. Li, Q.-K. Xue, and Z. Chen, Nature , 1 (2026)

    2026

  73. [73]

    E. H. da Silva Neto, R. Comin, F. He, R. Sutarto, Y. Jiang, R. L. Greene, G. A. Sawatzky, and A. Dam- ascelli, Science347, 282 (2015)

    2015

  74. [74]

    H. Shi, Z. Huo, G. Li, H. Ma, T. Cui, D. Yao, and D. Duan, Chinese Physics Letters42, 080708 (2025)

    2025

  75. [75]

    Kowalski, S

    N. Kowalski, S. S. Dash, P. S´ emon, D. S´ en´ echal, and A.- M. Tremblay, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2106476118 (2021)

    2021

  76. [76]

    Zhang and T

    F. Zhang and T. Rice, Physical Review B37, 3759 (1988)

    1988

  77. [77]

    Z. Dong, M. Huo, J. Li, J. Li, P. Li, H. Sun, L. Gu, Y. Lu, M. Wang, Y. Wang, and Z. chen, Nature630, 847 (2024)

    2024

  78. [78]

    Henkelman, A

    G. Henkelman, A. Arnaldsson, and H. J´ onsson, Compu- tational Materials Science36, 354 (2006)

    2006

  79. [79]

    Y.-H. Tian, Y. Chen, J.-M. Wang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y. Lu, Physical Review B109, 165154 (2024)

    2024

  80. [80]

    X.-W. Yi, W. Li, J.-Y. You, B. Gu, and G. Su, Physical Review B112, L140504 (2025)

    2025

Showing first 80 references.