pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01647 · v1 · pith:T3YOWKOJnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🪐 quant-ph

Extensible Fluxonium Architecture Using Tunable Couplers with Low Shunt Capacitance

Peng Zhao , Peng Xu , Zheng-Yuan Xue This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 14:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords fluxonium qubitstunable couplers2D qubit arraysquartonsuperconducting circuitsscalable quantum computinghigh-fidelity gatesspectator errors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fluxonium qubits scale to 2D grids via low-shunt-capacitance tunable couplers based on quarton or fluxonium circuits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes an architecture that places tunable couplers with small shunt capacitances between fluxonium qubits to enable strong, controllable interactions in two-dimensional square lattices. This solves the connectivity bottleneck that arises when fluxoniums have tiny footprints and limited capacitance budgets. The design allows multiple neighbor connections while still delivering large coupling strengths. Both quarton and fluxonium realizations of the coupler are shown to support fast gates with high fidelity and low errors on spectator qubits.

Core claim

Embedding low-shunt-capacitance couplers realized as generalized flux qubits into 2D square lattices yields large tunable couplings even with modest coupling capacitances, thereby supporting multiple connections within the available capacitance budget and enabling fast, high-fidelity two-qubit gates with low spectator errors.

What carries the argument

Low-shunt-capacitance tunable couplers (quarton and fluxonium realizations) that mediate controllable interactions between fluxonium qubits while preserving capacitance budget for multiple 2D connections.

If this is right

  • Large coupling strengths become reachable with coupling capacitances small enough to allow four or more neighbors per qubit.
  • Both quarton and fluxonium coupler designs produce fast gates while keeping spectator errors low.
  • The architecture supports multiple connections on 2D grids without exhausting the shunt-capacitance allowance.
  • Tunable interactions remain controllable even when the qubit footprint is kept small.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same coupler approach could relax wiring density requirements in larger superconducting processors by moving control to the coupler lines.
  • Small lattices built this way could serve as testbeds to quantify crosstalk growth before scaling to 10-by-10 arrays.
  • If the couplers add negligible decoherence, the architecture might combine with existing fluxonium coherence advantages to reach error rates suitable for error-corrected logical qubits.
  • Frequency crowding limits could be probed by simulating or measuring spectra of 3-by-3 patches with realistic fabrication spreads.

Load-bearing premise

The coupler circuits themselves can be fabricated and operated without introducing decoherence, frequency crowding, or control overhead that would spoil the claimed gate fidelities and spectator-error levels in a real array.

What would settle it

Fabricate and measure a 2-by-2 fluxonium array using the proposed couplers and check whether two-qubit gate fidelities remain above 99 percent while spectator-qubit error rates stay below 0.1 percent and coherence times match single-qubit benchmarks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01647 by Peng Xu, Peng Zhao, Zheng-Yuan Xue.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) A 2D square lattice comprising fluxonium qubits [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Energy levels of the quarton coupler, (b) magni [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) State hybridization and (b) state-dependent frequency shift of the transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Fluxonium qubits have demonstrated high-fidelity operations and long coherence times in small-scale systems, highlighting their promise for quantum computing. However, large-scale integration into a high-performance two-dimensional (2D) qubit array remains the central challenge for practical applications. In this work, we introduce an extensible architecture for scaling up fluxonium qubits in 2D grids. To address the key challenges, namely achieving controllable strong interaction and high connectivity for qubits featuring small shunting capacitors (footprints), we propose using low-shunt-capacitance couplers to enable tunable interactions between fluxonium qubits. When embedded into 2D square lattices, large couplings can be achieved even with relatively small coupling capacitances, thus enabling multiple connections with sufficient capacitance budget. We further propose coupler realizations based on generalized flux qubit circuits, specifically the quarton and the fluxonium, and demonstrate that both enable fast, high-fidelity gates with low spectator errors, while supporting multiple connections on 2D grids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an extensible architecture for scaling fluxonium qubits into 2D square lattices by employing tunable couplers with low shunt capacitance, realized via generalized flux-qubit circuits (quarton and fluxonium). The central claims are that this design achieves large tunable couplings even with small coupling capacitances (enabling multiple connections within the capacitance budget) and that both coupler types support fast, high-fidelity gates with low spectator errors.

Significance. If the simulation results hold under realistic multi-coupler conditions, the work would address a key integration barrier for fluxonium qubits by relaxing the shunt-capacitance constraint while preserving high connectivity. The explicit proposal of quarton- and fluxonium-based couplers, together with the reported gate-fidelity and spectator-error metrics, constitutes a concrete design contribution that could be tested experimentally.

major comments (1)
  1. [Gate performance and simulation sections] The gate-fidelity and spectator-error results (presumably obtained via circuit simulations or Hamiltonian diagonalization) are presented for isolated qubit-coupler pairs or minimal clusters. No quantitative analysis of cumulative capacitive loading, frequency crowding, or cross-talk arising from multiple simultaneous couplers in a dense 2D lattice is provided; this directly bears on the claim that the architecture remains extensible with low spectator errors.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a minor grammatical issue: 'namely achieving controllable strong interaction' should be rephrased for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the referee's report. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Gate performance and simulation sections] The gate-fidelity and spectator-error results (presumably obtained via circuit simulations or Hamiltonian diagonalization) are presented for isolated qubit-coupler pairs or minimal clusters. No quantitative analysis of cumulative capacitive loading, frequency crowding, or cross-talk arising from multiple simultaneous couplers in a dense 2D lattice is provided; this directly bears on the claim that the architecture remains extensible with low spectator errors.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. Our gate performance results are indeed based on simulations of isolated qubit-coupler pairs and minimal clusters, as full simulations of a complete 2D lattice with multiple active couplers would require significant additional computational resources. The manuscript focuses on demonstrating the core advantages of the low-shunt-capacitance coupler design, including the ability to achieve strong couplings with small capacitances that permit multiple connections in a 2D grid, as shown in our capacitance budget analysis. Spectator errors are quantified in configurations that include neighboring couplers, indicating low cross-talk in those setups. We believe these results provide a solid foundation for the extensibility claim, though we agree that more comprehensive lattice-scale simulations would be valuable for future work. No changes to the manuscript are planned in response to this comment, as the current scope is clearly stated. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal grounded in standard circuit-QED principles

full rationale

The manuscript is an architectural proposal for embedding fluxonium qubits into 2D lattices via low-shunt-capacitance tunable couplers (quarton and fluxonium realizations). No derivation chain, fitted parameters, or first-principles predictions appear in the provided text. Claims rest on standard capacitive-coupling and Hamiltonian-simulation methods without self-referential definitions, fitted-input renamings, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central result to its own inputs. The absence of equations or quantitative fits in the abstract and summary precludes any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract only; no numerical parameters, background axioms, or new postulated entities are stated in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5700 in / 1218 out tokens · 21970 ms · 2026-06-28T14:33:16.861145+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Jiang, C

    Y.-Y. Jiang, C. Deng, H. Fan, B.-Y. Li, L. Sun, X.-S. Tan, W. Wang, G.-M. Xue, F. Yan, H.-F. Yu, Y.-S. Zhang, Y.-R. Zhang, and C.-L. Zou, Advancements in supercon- ducting quantum computing, Natl. Sci. Rev.12, nwaf246 (2025)

    2025

  2. [2]

    V. E. Manucharyan, J. Koch, L. I. Glazman, and M. H. Devoret, Fluxonium: Single Cooper-pair circuit free of charge offsets, Science326, 113 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    L. B. Nguyen, Y.-H. Lin, A. Somoroff, R. Mencia, N. Grabon, and V. E. Manucharyan, High-coherence fluxo- nium qubit, Phys. Rev. X9, 041041 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    Somoroff, Q

    A. Somoroff, Q. Ficheux, R. A. Mencia, H. Xiong, R. Kuzmin, and V. E. Manucharyan, Millisecond coherence in a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 267001 (2023)

    2023

  5. [5]

    D. A. Rower, L. Ding, H. Zhang, M. Hays, J. An, P. 6 M. Harrington, I. T. Rosen, J. M. Gertler, T. M. Haz- ard, B. M. Niedzielski, M. E. Schwartz, S. Gustavsson, K. Sernia, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, Suppress- ing Counter-Rotating Errors for Fast Single-Qubit Gates with Fluxonium, PRX Quantum5, 040342 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    L. Ding, M. Hays, Y. Sung, B. Kannan, J. An, A. Di Paolo, A. H. Karamlou, T. M. Hazard, K. Azar, D. K. Kim, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Melville, M. E. Schwartz, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, J. A. Grover, K. Serniak, and W. D. Oliver, High-fidelity, frequency- flexible two-qubit fluxonium gates with a transmon cou- pler, Phys. Rev. X13, 031035 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Zhang, C

    H. Zhang, C. Ding, D. Weiss, Z. Huang, Y. Ma, C. Guinn, S. Sussman, S. P. Chitta, D. Chen, A. A. Houck, J. Koch, and D. I. Schuster, Tunable inductive coupler for high- fidelity gates between fluxonium qubits, PRX Quantum 5, 020326 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    W.-J. Lin, H. Cho, Y. Chen, M. G. Vavilov, C. Wang, and V. E. Manucharyan, 24 Days-Stable CNOT Gate on Fluxonium Qubits with Over 99.9% Fidelity, PRX Quantum6, 010349 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-insensitive qubit design de- rived from the cooper pair box, Phys. Rev. A76, 042319 (2007)

    2007

  10. [10]

    P. Zhao, G. Zhao, S. Li, C. Zha, and M. Gong, Scalable fluxonium qubit architecture with tunable interactions between non-computational levels, Phys. Rev. Appl.25, 044072 (2026)

    2026

  11. [11]

    P. Zhao, P. Xu, and Z.-Y. Xue, Scalable native multiqubit gates via engineered noncomputational-state interactions in superconducting fluxonium qubits, Phys. Rev. A113, 022604 (2026)

    2026

  12. [12]

    M. F. S. Zwanenburg and C. K. Andersen, Crosstalk in Multi-Qubit Fluxonium Architectures with Transmon Couplers, arXiv:2603.09870

    arXiv

  13. [13]

    Z. Zhan, Z. Li, F. Wang, W. Lan, Xi. Pan, L. Xiang, X. Dou, R. Gao, G. Gong, Y. Guoet al., Scalable Fluxonium Quantum Processors via Tunable-Coupler Architecture, arXiv:2604.13363

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    G. X. Chan, W. Lan, T. Wang, X. Ma, C. Deng, and L. Jin, System-Level Design of Scalable Fluxonium Quantum Processors with Double-Transmon Couplers, arXiv:2604.26373

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    K. N. Nesterov, I. V. Pechenezhskiy, C. Wang, V. E. Manucharyan, and M. G. Vavilov, Microwave-activated controlled-Zgate for fixed-frequency fluxonium qubits, Phys. Rev. A98, 030301 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    L. B. Nguyen, G. Koolstra, Y. Kim, A. Morvan, T. Chis- tolini, S. Singh, K. N. Nesterov, C. J¨ unger, L. Chen, Z. Pedramrazi, B. K. Mitchell, J. M. Kreikebaum, S. Puri, D. I. Santiago, and I Siddiqi, Blueprint for a High-Performance Fluxonium Quantum Processor, PRX Quantum3, 037001 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    V. D. Moreno, N. D. Dimitrov, V. E. Manucharyan, and M. G. Vavilov, CNOT gates in inductively coupled multi- fluxonium systems, arXiv:2512.11756

    arXiv

  18. [18]

    A. A. Kugut, G. S. Mazhorin, and I. A. Simakov, Interaction-Resilient Scalable Fluxonium Architecture with All-Microwave Gates, arXiv:2512.21189

    arXiv

  19. [19]

    E. Y. Huang and C. K. Andersen, Exploration of Fluxo- nium Parameters for Capacitive Cross-Resonance Gates, arXiv:2603.17936

    arXiv

  20. [20]

    Brink, J

    M. Brink, J. M. Chow, J. Hertzberg, E. Magesan, and Sami Rosenblatt, Device challenges for near term superconducting quantum processors: frequency colli- sions, 2018 IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Malekakhlagh, E

    M. Malekakhlagh, E. Magesan, and D. C. McKay, First- principles analysis of cross-resonance gate operation, Phys. Rev. A102, 042605 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    Zhao, Mitigation of quantum crosstalk in cross- resonance-based qubit architectures, Phys

    P. Zhao, Mitigation of quantum crosstalk in cross- resonance-based qubit architectures, Phys. Rev. Appl. 20, 054033 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    K. Heya, M. Malekakhlagh, S. Merkel, N. Kanazawa, and E. Pritchett, Floquet analysis of frequency collisions, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 024035 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    I. N. Moskalenko, I. S. Besedin, I. A. Simakov, and A. V. Ustinov, Tunable coupling scheme for implementing two-qubit gates on fluxonium qubits, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 194001 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    I. N. Moskalenko, I. A. Simakov, N. N. Abramov, A. A. Grigorev, D. O. Moskalev, A. A. Pishchimova, N. S. Smirnov, E. V. Zikiy, I. A. Rodionov, and I. S. Besedin, High fidelity two-qubit gates on fluxoniums using a tun- able coupler, npj Quantum Inf.8, 130 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    Y. Chen, C. Neill, P. Roushan, N. Leung, M. Fang, R. Barends, J. Kelly, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, and B. Chiaro et al., Qubit architecture with high coherence and fast tunable coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 220502 (2014)

    2014

  27. [27]

    F. Yan, P. Krantz, Y. Sung, M. Kjaergaard, D. L. Campbell, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Tunable Coupling Scheme for Implementing High-Fidelity Two-Qubit Gates, Phys. Rev. Appl.10, 054062 (2018)

    2018

  28. [28]

    Goto, Double-Transmon Coupler: Fast Two-Qubit Gate with No Residual Coupling for Highly Detuned Superconducting Qubits, Phys

    H. Goto, Double-Transmon Coupler: Fast Two-Qubit Gate with No Residual Coupling for Highly Detuned Superconducting Qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 034038 (2022)

    2022

  29. [29]

    D. L. Campbell, A.a Kamal, L. Ranzani, M. Senatore, and M. D. LaHaye, Modular Tunable Coupler for Super- conducting Circuits, Phys. Rev. Appl.19, 064043 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Miyanaga, A

    T. Miyanaga, A. Tomonaga, H. Ito, H. Mukai, and J.S. Tsai, Ultrastrong Tunable Coupler Between Supercon- ducting LC Resonators, Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 064041 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    P. Zhao, P. Xu, and Z.-Y. Xue, Long-range tunable coupler for modular fluxonium quantum processors, arXiv:2604.12261

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    E. L. Rosenfeld, C. T. Hann, D. I. Schuster, M. H. Ma- theny, and A. A. Clerk, High-Fidelity Two-Qubit Gates between Fluxonium Qubits with a Resonator Coupler, PRX Quantum5, 040317 (2024)

    2024

  33. [33]

    F. Yan, Y. Sung, P. Krantz, A. Kamal, D. K. Kim, J. L. Yoder, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Engineering Framework for Optimizing Superconducting Qubit Designs, arXiv:2006.04130

    arXiv 2006

  34. [34]

    Ficheux, L

    Q. Ficheux, L. B. Nguyen, A. Somoroff, H. Xiong, K. N. Nesterov, M. G. Vavilov, and V. E. Manucharyan, Fast logic with slow qubits: Microwave-activated controlled- Z gate on low-frequency fluxoniums, Phys. Rev. X11, 021026 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    I. A. Simakov, G. S. Mazhorin, I. N. Moskalenko, N. N. Abramov, A. A. Grigorev, D. O. Moskalev, A. A. Pishchi- mova, N. S. Smirnov, E. V. Zikiy, I. A. Rodionov, and I. S. Besedin, Coupler Microwave-Activated Controlled- Phase Gate on Fluxonium Qubits, PRX Quantum4, 7 040321 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    P. Zhao, P. Xu, and Z.-Y. Xue, Fast entangling gates on fluxoniums via parametric modulation of plasmon inter- action, arXiv:2509.04762

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, A. W. Cross, S. T. Merkel, C. Rigetti, and M. Steffen, Microwave-activated conditional-phase gate for superconducting qubits, New J. Phys.15, 115012 (2013)

    2013

  38. [38]

    A. O. Niskanen, K. Harrabi, F. Yoshihara, Y. Nakamura, S. Lloyd, and J. S. Tsai, Quantum coherent tunable cou- pling of superconducting qubits, Science316, 723 (2007)

    2007

  39. [39]

    Mundada, G

    P. Mundada, G. Zhang, T. Hazard, and A. Houck, Sup- pression of Qubit Crosstalk in a Tunable Coupling Super- conducting Circuit, Phys. Rev. Appl.12, 054023 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    DiCarlo, J

    L. DiCarlo, J. M. Chow, J. M. Gambetta, L. S. Bishop, B. R. Johnson, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor, Nature (London)460, 240 (2009)

    2009

  41. [41]

    Krinner, S

    S. Krinner, S. Lazar, A. Remm, C.K. Andersen, N. Lacroix, G. J. Norris, C. Hellings, M. Gabureac, C. Eich- ler, and A. Wallraff, Benchmarking Coherent Errors in Controlled-Phase Gates due to Spectator Qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl.14, 024042 (2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    Cai, X.-Y

    T.-Q. Cai, X.-Y. Han, Y.-K. Wu, Y.-L. Ma, J.-H. Wang, Z.-L. Wang, H.-Y. Zhang, H.-Y. Wang, Y.-P. Song, and L.-M. Duan, Impact of Spectators on a Two-Qubit Gate in a Tunable Coupling Superconducting Circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 060505 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    Motzoi, J

    F. Motzoi, J. M. Gambetta, P. Rebentrost, and F. K. Wilhelm, Simple Pulses for Elimination of Leakage in Weakly Nonlinear Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 110501 (2009)

    2009

  44. [44]

    L. H. Pedersen, N. M. Møller, and K. Mølmer, Fidelity of quantum operations, Phys. Lett. A367, 47 (2007)

    2007

  45. [45]

    [24, 25], which is limited by the weak transition dipole in the qubit subspace, we in- stead focus on interactions involving non-computational states

    Unlike the tunable control of computational-state inter- actions demonstrated in Refs. [24, 25], which is limited by the weak transition dipole in the qubit subspace, we in- stead focus on interactions involving non-computational states

  46. [46]

    N. P. Breuckmann and J. N. Eberhardt, Quantum Low- Density Parity-Check Codes, PRX Quantum2, 040101 (2021)

    2021

  47. [47]

    Bravyi, A

    S. Bravyi, A. W. Cross, J. M. Gambetta, D. Maslov, P. Rall, and T. J. Yoder, High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory, Nature627, 778 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Marxer, A

    F. Marxer, A. Veps¨ al¨ ainen, S. W. Jolin, J. Tuorila, A. Landra, C. Ockeloen-Korppi, W. Liu, O. Ahonen, A. Aueret al., Long-Distance Transmon Coupler with CZ- Gate Fidelity above 99.8%, PRX Quantum4, 010314 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    Liang, X.-H

    G.-H. Liang, X.-H. Song, C.-L. Deng, X.-Y. Gu, Y. Yan, Z.-Y. Mei, S.-L. Zhao, Y.-Z. Bu, Y.-X. Xiaoet al., Tunable-coupling architectures with capacitively con- necting pads for large-scale superconducting multiqubit processors, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 044028 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    F.-M. Liu, C. Wang, M.-C. Chen, H. Chen, S.-W. Li, Z.- X. Shang, C. Ying, J.-W. Wang, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Quantum computer- aided design for advanced superconducting qubit: Plas- monium, Sci. Bull.68, 1625 (2023)

    2023

  51. [51]

    K. Azar, L. Ateshian, M. T. Randeria, R. DePencier Pi˜ nero, J. M. Gertler, J. An, F. Contipelli, L. Ding, M. Gingras, K. Grossklauset al., Characterization and Comparison of Energy Relaxation in Fluxonium Qubits, arXiv:2603.23636

    arXiv

  52. [52]

    T. Abad, Y. Schattner, A. F. Kockum, and G. Johansson, Impact of decoherence on the fidelity of quantum gates leaving the computational subspace, Quantum9, 1684 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    J. M. Gambetta, C. E. Murray, Y.-K.-K. Fung, D. T. McClure, O. Dial, W. Shanks, J. W. Sleight, and M. Stef- fen, Investigating surface loss effects in superconducting transmon qubits, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond.27, 1 (2016)

    2016