Power Semigroups and Two Rigidity Theorems for Groups
Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 12:20 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
If the power semigroup of a group is isomorphic to the power semigroup of a semigroup, then the group and the semigroup are isomorphic.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
If H is a group and K is a semigroup such that the power semigroup P(H) is isomorphic to P(K), then H is isomorphic to K. The corresponding statement for the finitary power semigroups P_fin(H) and P_fin(K) holds when H is an additive subgroup of the rationals.
What carries the argument
The power semigroup P(H), which is the set of all non-empty subsets of H equipped with the operation A * B = {ab | a in A, b in B}.
Load-bearing premise
The finitary result depends on a special case of a theorem from diophantine approximation about solutions to linear equations over the rationals.
What would settle it
Finding a group H and a semigroup K that are not isomorphic, yet their collections of non-empty subsets with setwise multiplication are isomorphic as semigroups.
read the original abstract
Let $\mathcal P(H)$ be the semigroup obtained by endowing the family of all non-empty subsets of a semigroup $H$ with the setwise operation naturally induced by $H$ on its power set, and denote by $\mathcal P_\text{fin}(H)$ the subsemigroup of $\mathcal P(H)$ consisting of all non-empty finite subsets of $H$. We obtain (as a corollary of a theorem of independent interest) that if $H$ is a group and $K$ is a semigroup, then $\mathcal P(H) \cong \mathcal P(K)$ implies $H \cong K$. The finitary analogue of this statement is considerably more difficult, and we prove it only for $H$ an additive subgroup of the rationals. Most notably, the proof of the second result relies, in a rather circuitous way, on a special case of the Evertse--Schlickewei--Schmidt theorem.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript claims that if H is a group and K a semigroup then an isomorphism P(H) ≅ P(K) implies H ≅ K, obtained as a corollary of a theorem of independent interest. It further claims that the finitary analogue holds when H and K are additive subgroups of the rationals, with the proof relying in a circuitous manner on a special case of the Evertse--Schlickewei--Schmidt theorem from diophantine approximation.
Significance. If correct, the results would establish strong rigidity properties showing that the power-semigroup structure determines the underlying group up to isomorphism, with the non-finitary case extending to arbitrary semigroups. The finitary result, though restricted to subgroups of Q, forges a link between semigroup isomorphisms and Diophantine equations that may interest researchers working at the interface of algebra and number theory. No machine-checked proofs or reproducible code are mentioned.
major comments (2)
- [Proof of the finitary rigidity theorem] Proof of the finitary rigidity theorem (abstract and the section containing the second result): the reduction that translates an isomorphism of finite power semigroups into an instance of the Evertse--Schlickewei--Schmidt theorem is described as circuitous; the manuscript must supply an explicit account of how every finite-subset equation arising from the semigroup isomorphism is converted into an S-unit equation, and must verify that the argument covers all additive subgroups of Q, including those that are not finitely generated.
- [Statement of the main theorem] Statement of the main (non-finitary) rigidity theorem: because the primary claim is presented only as a corollary, the independent theorem on which it rests must be stated in full (including any hypotheses) so that the reader can confirm that the implication P(H) ≅ P(K) o H ≅ K follows without additional restrictions on K.
minor comments (1)
- The abstract should briefly name or characterize the independent theorem used for the non-finitary result.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. We address the two major comments below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and completeness.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Proof of the finitary rigidity theorem] Proof of the finitary rigidity theorem (abstract and the section containing the second result): the reduction that translates an isomorphism of finite power semigroups into an instance of the Evertse--Schlickewei--Schmidt theorem is described as circuitous; the manuscript must supply an explicit account of how every finite-subset equation arising from the semigroup isomorphism is converted into an S-unit equation, and must verify that the argument covers all additive subgroups of Q, including those that are not finitely generated.
Authors: We agree that the reduction step would benefit from greater explicitness. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection that enumerates, for each type of equation arising from an assumed isomorphism of finite power semigroups, the precise sequence of algebraic manipulations that produces the corresponding S-unit equation. We will also add a short paragraph confirming that the argument extends to arbitrary (possibly non-finitely generated) additive subgroups of Q: any such subgroup is the directed union of its finitely generated subgroups, the Evertse--Schlickewei--Schmidt theorem applies uniformly to each finite-rank piece, and the resulting bounds are independent of the rank, so the global conclusion carries over without additional hypotheses. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Statement of the main theorem] Statement of the main (non-finitary) rigidity theorem: because the primary claim is presented only as a corollary, the independent theorem on which it rests must be stated in full (including any hypotheses) so that the reader can confirm that the implication P(H) ≅ P(K) → H ≅ K follows without additional restrictions on K.
Authors: We accept the referee’s observation. The revised version will first state the independent theorem in full, with all hypotheses made explicit, and only then derive the corollary that an isomorphism P(H) ≅ P(K) implies H ≅ K whenever H is a group and K is an arbitrary semigroup. This presentation will make the absence of further restrictions on K immediately visible to the reader. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: main result is corollary of independent theorem; finitary case uses external ESS theorem.
full rationale
The abstract explicitly frames the primary rigidity theorem as a corollary of a separate theorem of independent interest, and the finitary case for subgroups of Q is proved via a special case of the external Evertse--Schlickewei--Schmidt theorem from diophantine approximation. No self-citations, self-definitional steps, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work by the same authors appear in the provided text. The derivation chain does not reduce any claimed implication to its own inputs by construction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- standard math The setwise product of subsets is associative and yields a semigroup.
- standard math Groups are associative with identity and inverses.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Antoniou and S
A.A. Antoniou and S. Tringali,On the Arithmetic of Power Monoids and Sumsets in Cyclic Groups, Pacific J. Math.312(2021), No. 2, 279–308
2021
-
[2]
Baer,Abelian groups without elements of finite order, Duke Math
R. Baer,Abelian groups without elements of finite order, Duke Math. J.3(1937), 68–122
1937
-
[3]
Ballieu,Sur les groupes de parties d’un demi-groupe(French), Ann
R. Ballieu,Sur les groupes de parties d’un demi-groupe(French), Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles, Sér. I64(1950), 139–147
1950
-
[4]
Bérczes, L
A. Bérczes, L. Hajdu, I. Pink, and S.S. Rout,Sums ofS-units in recurrence sequences, J. Number Theory 196(2019), 353—363
2019
-
[5]
Bienvenu and A
P.-Y. Bienvenu and A. Geroldinger,On algebraic properties of power monoids of numerical monoids, Israel J. Math.265(2025), 867–900
2025
-
[6]
Burton,Elementary Number Theory, McGraw–Hill, 2010 (7th edition)
D.M. Burton,Elementary Number Theory, McGraw–Hill, 2010 (7th edition)
2010
-
[7]
Byrd, J.T
R.D. Byrd, J.T. Lloyd, F.D. Pedersen, and J.W. Stepp,Automorphisms of the semigroup of finite complexes of a periodic locally cyclic group, Pacific J. Math.72(1977), No. 1, 27–39
1977
-
[8]
Byrd, J.T
R.D. Byrd, J.T. Lloyd, R.A. Mena, and J.R. Teller,Automorphisms of the semigroup of finite complexes of locally finite groups, J. Reine Angew. Math. 299/300 (1978), 151–160
1978
-
[9]
Byrd, J.T
R.D. Byrd, J.T. Lloyd, and J.W. Stepp,The automorphism group of the semigroup of finite complexes of a rank one torsion free Abelian group, Arch. Math.39(1982), 385–393
1982
-
[10]
Byrd, J.T
R.D. Byrd, J.T. Lloyd, F.D. Pedersen, and J.W. Stepp,The automorphism group of some semigroups, Fund. Math.124(1984), No. 2, 187–195
1984
-
[11]
Cossu and S
L. Cossu and S. Tringali,On power monoids and factorization, J. Algebra686(Jan 2026), 793–813
2026
-
[12]
Evertse, H
J.-H. Evertse, H. P. Schlickewei, and W. M. Schmidt,Linear equations in variables which lie in a multiplicative group, Ann. of Math. (2)155(2002), no. 3, 807–836
2002
-
[13]
Fan and S
Y. Fan and S. Tringali,Power monoids: A bridge between Factorization Theory and Arithmetic Combinatorics, J. Algebra512(Oct. 2018), 252–294
2018
-
[14]
Gan and X
A. Gan and X. Zhao,Global determinism of Clifford semigroups, J. Australian Math. Soc.97(2014), 63–77
2014
-
[15]
García-Sánchez and S
P.A. García-Sánchez and S. Tringali,Semigroups of ideals and isomorphism problems, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 153(2025), No. 6, 2323–2339
2025
-
[16]
Geroldinger and F
A. Geroldinger and F. Halter-Koch,Non-Unique Factorizations. Algebraic, Combinatorial and Analytic Theory, Pure Appl. Math.278, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006
2006
-
[17]
Gonzalez, E
V. Gonzalez, E. Li, H. Rabinovitz, P. Rodriguez, and M. Tirador,On the atomicity of power monoids of Puiseux monoids, Internat. J. Algebra Comput.35(2025), No. 2, 167–181
2025
-
[18]
Gould, J.A
M. Gould, J.A. Iskra, and C. Tsinakis,Globally determined lattices and semilattices, Algebra Universalis19 (1984), 137–141
1984
-
[19]
Howie,Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory, London Math
J.M. Howie,Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory, London Math. Soc. Monogr. Ser.12, Oxford Univ. Press, 1995
1995
-
[20]
Hungerford,Algebra, Graduate Text Math.73, Springer–Verlag, 1974
T.W. Hungerford,Algebra, Graduate Text Math.73, Springer–Verlag, 1974
1974
-
[21]
Kobayashi,Semilattices are globally determined, Semigroup Forum29(1984), No
Y. Kobayashi,Semilattices are globally determined, Semigroup Forum29(1984), No. 1, 217–222
1984
-
[22]
Mogiljanskaja,Non-isomorphic semigroups with isomorphic semigroups of subsets, Semigroup Forum6 (1973), 330–333
E.M. Mogiljanskaja,Non-isomorphic semigroups with isomorphic semigroups of subsets, Semigroup Forum6 (1973), 330–333. 16 ShuolinLiuand SalvatoreTringali
1973
-
[23]
Rago,A counterexample to an isomorphism problem for power monoids, Proc
B. Rago,A counterexample to an isomorphism problem for power monoids, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.154 (2026), 1855–1858
2026
-
[24]
B. Rago,The automorphism group of reduced power monoids of finite abelian groups, preprint (arXiv: 2510.17533)
-
[25]
Rago,The isomorphism problem for reduced finitary power monoids, preprint (arXiv:2601.22469)
B. Rago,The isomorphism problem for reduced finitary power monoids, preprint (arXiv:2601.22469)
-
[26]
Shafer,Note on power semigroups, Math
J. Shafer,Note on power semigroups, Math. Japon.12(1967), 32
1967
-
[27]
Tamura,Isomorphism problem of power semigroups of completely0-simple semigroups, J
T. Tamura,Isomorphism problem of power semigroups of completely0-simple semigroups, J. Algebra98 (1986), no. 2, 319–361
1986
-
[28]
Tamura and J
T. Tamura and J. Shafer,Power semigroups, Math. Japon.12(1967), 25–32;Errata, ibid.29(1984), No. 4, 679
1967
-
[29]
On the isomorphism problem for power semigroups
S. Tringali, “On the isomorphism problem for power semigroups”, pp. 429–437 in: M. Brešar, A. Geroldinger, B. Olberding, and D. Smertnig (eds.),Recent Progress in Ring and Factorization Theory (Graz, Austria, July 10–14, 2023), Springer Proc. Math. Stat.477, Springer, 2025
2023
-
[30]
Tringali,Power monoids and their arithmetic: a survey, Amer
S. Tringali,Power monoids and their arithmetic: a survey, Amer. Math. Monthly, to appear (arXiv: 2602.15754)
-
[31]
S. Tringali and K. Wen,On the automorphisms of the power semigroups of numerical semigroups, Trans. London Math. Soc.13(2026), paper No. e70030 (DOI:https://doi.org/10.1112/tlm3.70030)
-
[32]
S. Tringali and K. Wen,The automorphism group of the finitary power monoid of the integers under addition, preprint (arXiv:2504.12566)
-
[33]
Tringali and W
S. Tringali and W. Yan,A conjecture by Bienvenu and Geroldinger on power monoids, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.153(2025), No. 3, 913–919
2025
-
[34]
Tringali and W
S. Tringali and W. Yan,On power monoids and their automorphisms, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A209(2025), 105961, 16 pp
2025
-
[35]
S. Tringali and W. Yan,Torsion groups and the Bienvenu–Geroldinger conjecture, Bull. London Math. Soc., to appear (arXiv:2601.19592)
-
[36]
D. Wong, S. Xu, C. Zhang, and J. Zhao,On automorphism groups of numerical power semigroups, J. Algebra, to appear (arXiv:2512.12606). (S.L.) School of Mathematical Sciences, Hebei Normal University | Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050024, China Email address:liushuolin77@gmail.com (S.T.) School of Mathematical Sciences, Hebei Normal University | Shijiazhua...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.