pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02598 · v1 · pith:AY2LLUIPnew · submitted 2026-05-23 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.HC

Assessing Region-Level EEG Contributions to Cognitive Workload Prediction

Jacob Wong , Sohan Singh , Prannaya Gupta , Jin Xing Ang , Kritika Johari , U-Xuan Tan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 14:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.HC
keywords EEGcognitive workloadregion-level analysisfrontal electrodessubject-independent evaluationelectrode ranking
0
0 comments X

The pith

Frontal electrode groups outperform the full-scalp baseline for cognitive workload prediction by 15-20% in relative rank across datasets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines which parts of the scalp provide the most useful EEG signals for estimating cognitive workload. By training prediction models on electrode groups from specific brain regions across four public datasets, it compares their performance to using the entire scalp under both mixed and subject-independent protocols. The analysis shows that frontal regions perform better than the full set, especially when predicting for new subjects not seen in training. The results suggest that focusing on frontal and fronto-central areas captures workload information more reliably and with fewer sensors.

Core claim

Across all datasets and subject-independent evaluations, frontal electrode groups outperform the full-scalp baseline by approximately 15-20% in relative rank position while using substantially fewer electrodes. Fronto-central regions exhibit the most stable predictive utility, whereas posterior and occipital regions contribute less consistently across experimental conditions.

What carries the argument

Model-agnostic performance-based ranking of anatomically defined scalp regions, aggregated via rank-based strategy across mixed-subject and subject-independent protocols.

If this is right

  • Workload monitoring systems can achieve comparable or better performance with fewer frontal electrodes.
  • Fronto-central regions provide the most consistent predictive utility across tasks and subjects.
  • Posterior and occipital regions contribute less reliably to workload prediction.
  • Electrode selection for efficient EEG systems should prioritize frontal placements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Wearable devices could focus electrodes on frontal areas to improve practicality for real-time monitoring.
  • The region-ranking method may help select electrodes for other EEG-based cognitive state tasks.
  • Further tests on varied hardware or clinical groups could check if the frontal advantage persists.

Load-bearing premise

The performance ranking of regions accurately captures their true information content for workload without depending on particular feature choices or model settings.

What would settle it

A new workload dataset where frontal regions fail to rank higher than the full-scalp baseline under subject-independent evaluation.

read the original abstract

Accurate and generalizable estimation of cognitive workload from electroencephalography (EEG) is critical for human-centered and safety-critical systems. Although EEG is widely used for workload assessment, the consistency of region-level EEG contributions across tasks, datasets, and subjects remains unclear. This paper presents a region-level evaluation framework for EEG-based workload prediction in which models are trained and evaluated using features extracted exclusively from electrodes belonging to anatomically defined scalp regions. We perform a large-scale analysis across four publicly available EEG workload datasets spanning diverse task demands, recording hardware, and electrode montages. Region importance is quantified using a model-agnostic, performance-based approach under both mixed-subject and subject-independent evaluation protocols, with results aggregated using a rank-based strategy to ensure robustness across experimental configurations. Across all datasets and subject-independent evaluations, frontal electrode groups outperform the full-scalp baseline by approximately 15-20% in relative rank position while using substantially fewer electrodes. Fronto-central regions exhibit the most stable predictive utility, whereas posterior and occipital regions contribute less consistently across experimental conditions. These findings indicate that workload-relevant EEG information is most consistently retained within frontal and fronto-central electrode groups, supporting the design of efficient and generalizable EEG-based workload monitoring systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a region-level evaluation framework for EEG-based cognitive workload prediction. Models are trained on electrode subsets from anatomically defined regions across four public datasets. Region importance is assessed via performance-based ranking aggregated across configurations using a rank-based strategy. The key finding is that frontal groups achieve 15-20% better relative rank than full-scalp in subject-independent settings, with fronto-central regions most stable.

Significance. If the findings hold, they provide evidence for concentrating EEG electrodes in frontal areas for workload monitoring, potentially improving efficiency and generalizability of such systems. The multi-dataset, subject-independent design and model-agnostic ranking are positive aspects that enhance the robustness of the conclusions.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3] §3.3 (rank aggregation strategy): The procedure ranks regions within each experimental configuration before aggregating. Given dataset heterogeneity in hardware, tasks, and montages, this does not demonstrate that performance differences isolate anatomical information content independent of feature extractor choices or model hyperparameters, which is load-bearing for the claim that frontal groups are generally superior.
  2. [Results section] Results section, subject-independent evaluations: The 15-20% relative rank gain for frontal groups is reported without accompanying statistical significance tests or multiple-comparison corrections across the four datasets and multiple regions; this undermines confidence that the gain is robust rather than sensitive to post-hoc region definitions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'model-agnostic' should be clarified by explicitly listing the feature sets and classifiers used, as this supports the central robustness claim.
  2. [Tables] Table captions: Ensure all tables reporting ranks include the exact number of electrodes per region and the baseline full-scalp configuration for direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.3] §3.3 (rank aggregation strategy): The procedure ranks regions within each experimental configuration before aggregating. Given dataset heterogeneity in hardware, tasks, and montages, this does not demonstrate that performance differences isolate anatomical information content independent of feature extractor choices or model hyperparameters, which is load-bearing for the claim that frontal groups are generally superior.

    Authors: The within-configuration ranking compares regions under identical conditions for feature extraction, model architecture, and hyperparameters, thereby controlling for those factors while isolating the effect of electrode subset. Aggregation of ranks across configurations then evaluates consistency of regional utility despite dataset differences. We agree that varying feature extractors or hyperparameters within configurations would provide additional isolation of anatomical contributions; we will add such experiments and a corresponding discussion of limitations in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results section] Results section, subject-independent evaluations: The 15-20% relative rank gain for frontal groups is reported without accompanying statistical significance tests or multiple-comparison corrections across the four datasets and multiple regions; this undermines confidence that the gain is robust rather than sensitive to post-hoc region definitions.

    Authors: We acknowledge that statistical testing was not included. In the revised manuscript we will add Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (or equivalent non-parametric tests) for rank differences, with Bonferroni or FDR correction for multiple comparisons across regions and datasets, and report the resulting p-values alongside the 15-20% relative rank figures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical ranking study with no derivation or fitted prediction reducing to inputs

full rationale

This is a purely empirical comparative study: models are trained on region-specific features from public datasets, evaluated on held-out subject-independent splits, ranked by performance, and aggregated. No equations, first-principles derivations, parameter fits that are then re-predicted, or self-citation chains appear in the load-bearing steps. All reported outcomes (e.g., frontal groups outperforming full-scalp by 15-20% relative rank) are direct experimental measurements, not reductions by construction. The study is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central empirical claim rests on standard domain assumptions about EEG spatial information content and ML generalization; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Anatomically defined scalp regions correspond to functionally distinct sources of workload-related EEG information
    Invoked when interpreting performance differences as region contributions rather than artifacts of electrode placement or volume conduction.
  • domain assumption The four chosen public datasets adequately sample the space of task demands, hardware, and subject variability
    Required to support the generalization that frontal regions are most consistent across experimental conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5758 in / 1355 out tokens · 44007 ms · 2026-06-30T14:35:18.266205+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing , volume=

    A review of channel selection algorithms for EEG signal processing , author=. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

    2015

  2. [2]

    Scientific Reports , volume=

    Cognitive load detection through EEG lead wise feature optimization and ensemble classification , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  3. [3]

    Frontiers in Psychiatry , volume=

    Identifying relevant EEG channels for subject-independent emotion recognition using attention network layers , author=. Frontiers in Psychiatry , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  4. [4]

    Sensors , volume=

    Feature selection model based on EEG signals for assessing the cognitive workload in drivers , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  5. [5]

    Clinical neurophysiology , volume=

    EMG contamination of EEG: spectral and topographical characteristics , author=. Clinical neurophysiology , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  6. [6]

    Mathematics , volume=

    Sensitive channel selection for mental workload classification , author=. Mathematics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  7. [7]

    Brain , volume=

    The rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10): A gateway between inner thought and the external world , author=. Brain , volume=

  8. [8]

    Sensors , volume=

    Rapid mental workload detection of air traffic controllers with three EEG sensors , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  9. [9]

    Alzheimer's research & therapy , volume=

    Selection of the optimal channel configuration for implementing wearable EEG devices for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment , author=. Alzheimer's research & therapy , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  10. [10]

    Scientific Reports , volume=

    Selecting EEG channels and features using multi-objective optimization for accurate MCI detection: validation using leave-one-subject-out strategy , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  11. [11]

    2014 , publisher=

    An introduction to the event-related potential technique , author=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  12. [12]

    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , volume=

    Measuring neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness , author=. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  13. [13]

    Biological psychology , volume=

    Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task , author=. Biological psychology , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  14. [14]

    Human Activity and Behavior Analysis , pages=

    Optimal EEG Electrode Set for Emotion Recognition from Brain Signals: An Empirical Quest , author=. Human Activity and Behavior Analysis , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  15. [15]

    Brain research reviews , volume=

    EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis , author=. Brain research reviews , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  16. [16]

    2014 , publisher=

    Analyzing neural time series data: theory and practice , author=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  17. [17]

    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , volume=

    Evaluation of a new lightweight EEG technology for translational applications of passive brain-computer interfaces , author=. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  18. [18]

    Sensors , volume=

    EEG Dataset Collection for Mental Workload Predictions in Flight-Deck Environment , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  19. [19]

    Data in Brief , volume=

    Cognitive load assessment through EEG: A dataset from arithmetic and Stroop tasks , author=. Data in Brief , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  20. [20]

    Data , volume=

    Electroencephalograms during mental arithmetic task performance , author=. Data , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  21. [21]

    Brain Sciences , volume=

    Modeling cognitive load as a self-supervised brain rate with electroencephalography and deep learning , author=. Brain Sciences , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  22. [22]

    Journal of neural engineering , volume=

    EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain--computer interfaces , author=. Journal of neural engineering , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  23. [23]

    Scientific Reports , volume=

    Exploration of an intrinsically explainable self-attention based model for prototype generation on single-channel EEG sleep stage classification , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  24. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02075 , year=

    Relu-kan: New kolmogorov-arnold networks that only need matrix addition, dot multiplication, and relu , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02075 , year=

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01533 , year=

    Efficient and effective time-series forecasting with spiking neural networks , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01533 , year=

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    Clinical Neurophysiology , volume=

    Introducing RELAX: An automated pre-processing pipeline for cleaning EEG data-Part 1: Algorithm and application to oscillations , author=. Clinical Neurophysiology , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  27. [27]

    Clinical Neurophysiology , volume=

    RELAX part 2: A fully automated EEG data cleaning algorithm that is applicable to Event-Related-Potentials , author=. Clinical Neurophysiology , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  28. [28]

    2021 , note =

    Bajaj,Nikesh and Requena Carrión, Jesús , title =. 2021 , note =

    2021

  29. [29]

    Flood , title =

    Matthew W. Flood , title =. 2021 , url =. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259448 , version =

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259448 2021

  30. [30]

    2013 , version =

    Davide Albanese and Michele Filosi and Roberto Visintainer and Samantha Riccadonna and Giuseppe Jurman and Cesare Furlanello , title =. 2013 , version =. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts707 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts707 2013

  31. [31]

    Proceedings of the 2004 congress on evolutionary computation (IEEE Cat

    Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behavior , author=. Proceedings of the 2004 congress on evolutionary computation (IEEE Cat. No. 04TH8753) , volume=. 2004 , organization=

    2004

  32. [32]

    Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology , volume=

    Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data , author=. Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  33. [33]

    Proceedings of the IEEE , volume =

    Training spiking neural networks using lessons from deep learning , author =. Proceedings of the IEEE , volume =

  34. [34]

    Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

    Hazan, Hananel and Saunders, Daniel J. and Khan, Hassaan and Patel, Devdhar and Sanghavi, Darpan T. and Siegelmann, Hava T. and Kozma, Robert , TITLE=. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics , VOLUME=. 2018 , URL=. doi:10.3389/fninf.2018.00089 , ISSN=

    work page doi:10.3389/fninf.2018.00089 2018

  35. [35]

    Sensors , volume=

    A review of EEG signal features and their application in driver drowsiness detection systems , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  36. [36]

    Scientific Reports , volume=

    EEG feature selection method based on maximum information coefficient and quantum particle swarm , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  37. [37]

    Expert Systems with Applications , volume=

    NeuroXAI: Adaptive, robust, explainable surrogate framework for determination of channel importance in EEG application , author=. Expert Systems with Applications , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  38. [38]

    Measurement science review , volume=

    Fundamentals of EEG measurement , author=. Measurement science review , volume=

  39. [39]

    Frontiers in integrative neuroscience , volume=

    The functional significance of delta oscillations in cognitive processing , author=. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  40. [40]

    Scientific Reports , volume=

    Classification of mental workload using brain connectivity and machine learning on electroencephalogram data , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  41. [41]

    2024 46th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) , pages=

    Functional connectivity methods for multi-class mental workload classification , author=. 2024 46th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    2024

  42. [42]

    IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , volume=

    EEG-based multiclass workload identification using feature fusion and selection , author=. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  43. [43]

    and Varoquaux, G

    Pedregosa, F. and Varoquaux, G. and Gramfort, A. and Michel, V. and Thirion, B. and Grisel, O. and Blondel, M. and Prettenhofer, P. and Weiss, R. and Dubourg, V. and Vanderplas, J. and Passos, A. and Cournapeau, D. and Brucher, M. and Perrot, M. and Duchesnay, E. , journal=. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in

  44. [44]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  45. [45]

    Proceedings of the IEEE , volume=

    Training spiking neural networks using lessons from deep learning , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  46. [46]

    Science Advances , volume =

    Wei Fang and Yanqi Chen and Jianhao Ding and Zhaofei Yu and Timothée Masquelier and Ding Chen and Liwei Huang and Huihui Zhou and Guoqi Li and Yonghong Tian , title =. Science Advances , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  47. [47]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05522 , year=

    Continuous thought machines , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05522 , year=

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine , volume=

    Fractal spiking neural network scheme for EEG-based emotion recognition , author=. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  49. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01177 , year=

    Learning to time-decode in spiking neural networks through the information bottleneck , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01177 , year=

    work page arXiv

  50. [50]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10780 , year=

    A comprehensive review of spiking neural networks: Interpretation, optimization, efficiency, and best practices , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10780 , year=

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Big Data and Cognitive Computing , volume=

    Comparing reservoir artificial and spiking neural networks in machine fault detection tasks , author=. Big Data and Cognitive Computing , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  52. [52]

    Neurocomputing , volume=

    Modulated spike-time dependent plasticity (STDP)-based learning for spiking neural network (SNN): A review , author=. Neurocomputing , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  53. [53]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering , volume=

    A spiking neural network with adaptive graph convolution and LSTM for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces , author=. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  54. [54]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04951 , year=

    EEG-NeXt: A Modernized ConvNet for The Classification of Cognitive Activity from EEG , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04951 , year=

    work page arXiv

  55. [55]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology , volume=

    Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  56. [56]

    Machine learning , volume=

    Random forests , author=. Machine learning , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  57. [57]

    Machine learning , volume=

    Extremely randomized trees , author=. Machine learning , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  58. [58]

    Journal of computer and system sciences , volume=

    A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , author=. Journal of computer and system sciences , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  59. [59]

    Annals of statistics , pages=

    Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine , author=. Annals of statistics , pages=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  60. [60]

    Cornell University , year=

    XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System , author=. Cornell University , year=

  61. [61]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  62. [62]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  63. [63]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Ngboost: Natural gradient boosting for probabilistic prediction , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2020 , organization=

    2020

  64. [64]

    Machine learning , volume=

    Support-vector networks , author=. Machine learning , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  65. [65]

    2006 , publisher=

    Gaussian processes for machine learning , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  66. [66]

    arXiv , author=

    Imbalanced-learn: a Python toolbox to tackle the curse of imbalanced datasets in machine learning. arXiv , author=. Preprint posted online on September , volume=

  67. [67]

    IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing , volume=

    MOCAS: A multimodal dataset for objective cognitive workload assessment on simultaneous tasks , author=. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  68. [68]

    Frontiers in Neuroscience , volume=

    Wauc: a multi-modal database for mental workload assessment under physical activity , author=. Frontiers in Neuroscience , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  69. [69]

    bioRxiv , pages=

    A multimodal human-computer interaction dataset for neurocognitive user state evaluation , author=. bioRxiv , pages=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  70. [70]

    2003 , publisher=

    Current practice of clinical electroencephalography , author=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  71. [71]

    Annual review of neuroscience , volume=

    An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function , author=. Annual review of neuroscience , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  72. [72]

    Science , volume=

    Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes , author=. Science , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  73. [73]

    Nature reviews neuroscience , volume=

    The cortical organization of speech processing , author=. Nature reviews neuroscience , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  74. [74]

    Nature reviews neuroscience , volume=

    Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , author=. Nature reviews neuroscience , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

    2002

  75. [75]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=

    Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention , author=. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  76. [76]

    Clinical neurophysiology , volume=

    Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , author=. Clinical neurophysiology , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  77. [77]

    Cerebral cortex , volume=

    Neurophysiological measures of working memory and individual differences in cognitive ability and cognitive style , author=. Cerebral cortex , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  78. [78]

    Advances in psychology , volume=

    Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research , author=. Advances in psychology , volume=. 1988 , publisher=

    1988

  79. [79]

    2005 , publisher=

    Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields , author=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  80. [80]

    International journal of psychophysiology , volume=

    Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes , author=. International journal of psychophysiology , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

Showing first 80 references.