pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06845 · v1 · pith:JCPXX4YCnew · submitted 2026-06-05 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT

Weighted Sum-Rate Enhancement for Flexible Intelligent Metasurface-Assisted Multicell Systems

Hanwen Hu , Jiancheng An , Lu Gan , Hongbin Li , Naofal Al-Dhahir , George K. Karagiannidis , Arumugam Nallanathan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 21:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT math.IT
keywords flexible intelligent metasurfaceweighted sum-rate maximizationmulticell MU-MISOalternating optimizationphase shift designsurface shape morphingWMMSERiemannian conjugate gradient
0
0 comments X

The pith

An alternating optimization framework jointly tunes beamforming, phase shifts, and FIM surface shape to raise weighted sum-rate in multicell MU-MISO systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies maximization of weighted sum-rate in a multicell multi-user MISO system where a flexible intelligent metasurface sits at the cell boundary. The surface can morph its shape by adjusting the normal displacement of its scattering units, adding a degree of freedom beyond conventional rigid surfaces. The authors jointly optimize base-station beamforming vectors, the phase-shift matrix, and the surface shape while respecting transmit power, unit-modulus reflection, and morphing-range limits. Because the resulting problem is non-convex and the variables are tightly coupled, they introduce an alternating optimization procedure that converts the objective via the weighted minimum mean square error method and then cycles through block coordinate descent updates, Riemannian conjugate gradient steps for the phases, projected gradient descent for the shape, and closed-form beamforming solutions.

Core claim

By placing a flexible intelligent metasurface at the cell boundary and jointly optimizing the transmit beamforming at each base station, the unit-modulus phase shifts, and the morphable surface shape under power and displacement constraints, the weighted sum-rate of the multicell MU-MISO system can be improved through an alternating optimization framework that reformulates the objective with the weighted minimum mean square error criterion, applies block coordinate descent to decouple the variables, employs Riemannian conjugate gradient on the complex circle manifold for the phase matrix, projected gradient descent for the surface coordinates, and closed-form beamforming updates.

What carries the argument

The alternating optimization framework that combines WMMSE reformulation, BCD iteration, RCG for the phase-shift matrix on the unit-modulus manifold, and PGD for the surface shape coordinates, which together handle the non-convex coupling among beamformers, phases, and morphing variables.

If this is right

  • Beamforming vectors admit closed-form solutions once the other variables are fixed.
  • Phase shifts can be updated on the complex circle manifold via Riemannian conjugate gradient without violating unit-modulus constraints.
  • Surface shape coordinates can be adjusted via projected gradient descent while staying inside the allowed morphing range.
  • The extra morphing degree of freedom improves interference mitigation at cell boundaries compared with rigid surfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same alternating structure could be tested on single-cell or multi-surface deployments to check whether the morphing gain persists without inter-cell interference.
  • Replacing the inner RCG and PGD loops with learned surrogates might reduce iteration count while preserving the same stationary-point guarantees.
  • The framework's reliance on perfect channel state information suggests a natural extension to robust or statistical channel models that would be directly testable in the same simulation setup.

Load-bearing premise

The non-convex problem with coupled beamforming, phase, and shape variables can be solved to a practically useful point by cycling through WMMSE, BCD, RCG, and PGD under the stated power, unit-modulus, and morphing-range constraints.

What would settle it

Numerical evaluation showing that the weighted sum-rate achieved by the joint optimization remains essentially unchanged when the surface morphing degree of freedom is removed or when the surface is fixed to a flat shape would indicate that the extra DoF and the proposed solver do not deliver the claimed gains.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06845 by Arumugam Nallanathan, George K. Karagiannidis, Hanwen Hu, Hongbin Li, Jiancheng An, Lu Gan, Naofal Al-Dhahir.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: An illustration of the key parameters for an FIM-aided [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An FIM-aided multicell MU-MISO communication system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The simulated FIM-aided MU-MISO communication sce [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Convergence behavior under different values of normalized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Relationship between WSR, average iterations and SNR; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: WSR versus the transmit power Pt when considering N = 30. B. Performance Analysis In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: WSR versus the number of propagation paths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Achievable rate of each UE aided by RIS; (b) Achievable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Flexible intelligent metasurface (FIM) technology has emerged as a promising technology for enhancing wireless communication performance by dynamically reshaping the propagation environment. Compared with conventional rigid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS), an FIM is composed of multiple electromagnetic (EM) scattering units, each of which can flexibly modify its displacement in the direction normal to the surface, thereby cooperatively morphing the overall surface shape. This additional degree of freedom (DoF) enables improved beamforming and interference mitigation, particularly in complex multicell scenarios. In this paper, an optimization problem for maximizing the weighted sum-rate (WSR) in a multicell multi-user multiple-input single-output (MU-MISO) system assisted by an FIM deployed at the cell boundary is investigated. We jointly optimize the transmit beamforming at the base station (BS), the phase shift matrix, and the FIM surface shape, subject to constraints on the transmit power budget, unit-modulus reflection coefficients, and surface shape morphing range. Due to the non-convex objective function with highly coupled variables, solving the formulated optimization problem is challenging. To tackle this challenge, we propose an efficient alternating optimization framework that leverages the weighted minimum mean square error (WMMSE) method to reformulate the problem and the block coordinate descent (BCD) algorithm to iteratively update the variables. Specifically, the Riemannian conjugate gradient (RCG) algorithm is leveraged to optimize the phase shift matrix, while the projected gradient descent (PGD) method is adopted to optimize the surface shape of the FIM. Additionally, the optimal beamforming vectors are obtained in closed form.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper formulates a weighted sum-rate maximization problem for a multicell MU-MISO system assisted by a flexible intelligent metasurface (FIM) placed at the cell boundary. The FIM introduces an extra degree of freedom by allowing each scattering unit to adjust its normal displacement, thereby morphing the surface shape in addition to applying phase shifts. The joint optimization of BS beamforming vectors, FIM phase-shift matrix, and surface shape is performed subject to per-BS power, unit-modulus, and bounded morphing-range constraints. The non-convex problem is addressed by an alternating-optimization framework that applies the WMMSE reformulation, a BCD outer loop, the Riemannian conjugate gradient algorithm on the phase-shift manifold, projected gradient descent on the surface-shape variables, and closed-form beamformer updates.

Significance. If the convergence analysis and numerical results hold, the work supplies a concrete algorithmic treatment of an additional morphing degree of freedom that is absent from conventional rigid RIS models. The combination of WMMSE reformulation with manifold and projected-gradient sub-solvers is a standard yet correctly applied construction for this class of problems; the closed-form beamformer step is a clear algorithmic strength. The practical value hinges on the magnitude of the reported WSR gains relative to rigid-RIS baselines under realistic multicell interference.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Problem formulation] §3 (or wherever the surface-shape constraint is stated): the morphing-range bound is described only qualitatively; an explicit interval or maximum displacement value should be given so that the PGD projection step can be reproduced.
  2. [Algorithm description] The convergence proof for the overall BCD loop is only sketched; a short paragraph citing the standard monotonicity argument for WMMSE+BCD would strengthen the claim that the iterates reach a stationary point.
  3. [Numerical results] Figure captions and axis labels in the numerical-results section use inconsistent font sizes and omit units on the morphing-range axis; this reduces readability but does not affect the technical content.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the accurate summary of our work on weighted sum-rate maximization in FIM-assisted multicell MU-MISO systems and for the positive assessment of the algorithmic framework. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision and will ensure the revised manuscript clearly highlights the convergence properties and the magnitude of WSR gains relative to rigid-RIS baselines.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central contribution is an alternating optimization framework (WMMSE reformulation + BCD outer loop + RCG on the unit-modulus manifold for phases + PGD on the morphing variables + closed-form beamformers) applied to a non-convex WSR maximization problem under standard power and unit-modulus constraints. This construction relies on well-established optimization primitives from the wireless communications literature and does not reduce any claimed performance metric, uniqueness result, or prediction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and externally verifiable against the stated model and constraints.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the physical feasibility of FIM displacement control and the practical effectiveness of the alternating solver; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are stated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption An FIM can flexibly modify its displacement in the direction normal to the surface within a morphing range while maintaining unit-modulus reflection coefficients.
    Invoked as a constraint in the optimization problem formulation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5851 in / 1469 out tokens · 21583 ms · 2026-06-27T21:17:58.807267+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Weighted sum-rate maximization for flexible intelligent meta- surface aided multicell systems,

    H. Hu, J. An, L. Gan, A. Nallanathan, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Weighted sum-rate maximization for flexible intelligent meta- surface aided multicell systems,” in GLOBECOM 2025 - 2025 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2025, pp. 3618–3623

    2025

  2. [2]

    6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities,

    H. Tataria, M. Shafi, A. F. Molisch, M. Dohler, H. Sjöland, and F. Tufvesson, “6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 1166–1199, Jul. 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    Toward 6G networks: Use cases and technologies,

    M. Giordani, M. Polese, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi, “Toward 6G networks: Use cases and technologies,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 55–61, Mar. 2020

    2020

  4. [4]

    The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks,

    K. B. Letaief, W. Chen, Y. Shi, J. Zhang, and Y.-J. A. Zhang, “The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 84–90, Aug. 2019

    2019

  5. [5]

    Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,

    M. D. Renzo, A. Zappone, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, C. Yuen, J. de Rosny, and S. Tretyakov, “Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and the road ahead,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2450–2525, Nov. 2020

    2020

  6. [6]

    Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable meta- materials,

    T. J. Cui, M. Q. Qi, X. Wan, J. Zhao, and Q. Cheng, “Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable meta- materials,” Light Sci. Appl., vol. 3, no. 10, pp. e218–e218, Oct. 2014

    2014

  7. [7]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and opportunities,

    Y. Liu, X. Liu, X. Mu, T. Hou, J. Xu, M. D. Renzo, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and opportunities,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1546–1577, Third Quarter 2021

    2021

  8. [8]

    Codebook-based solutions for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces and their open challenges,

    J. An, C. Xu, Q. Wu, D. W. K. Ng, M. D. Renzo, C. Yuen, and L. Hanzo, “Codebook-based solutions for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces and their open challenges,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 134–141, Apr. 2024

    2024

  9. [9]

    Reconfigurable-intelligent- surface-assisted B5G/6G wireless communications: Challenges, solution, and future opportunities,

    Z. Chen, G. Chen, J. Tang, S. Zhang, D. K. So, O. A. Dobre, K. K. Wong, and J. Chambers, “Reconfigurable-intelligent- surface-assisted B5G/6G wireless communications: Challenges, solution, and future opportunities,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 16–22, Jan. 2023

    2023

  10. [10]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface-based wireless communica- tions: Antenna design, prototyping, and experimental results,

    L. Dai, B. Wang, M. Wang, X. Yang, J. Tan, S. Bi, S. Xu, F. Yang, Z. Chen, M. D. Renzo, C.-B. Chae, and L. Hanzo, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface-based wireless communica- tions: Antenna design, prototyping, and experimental results,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 45 913–45 923, 2020

    2020

  11. [11]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy efficiency in wireless communication,

    C. Huang, A. Zappone, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. Debbah, and C. Yuen, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for energy efficiency in wireless communication,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 4157–4170, Aug. 2019

    2019

  12. [12]

    Performance analysis of RIS-aided high-mobility wireless systems,

    H. Hu, J. An, L. Gan, and C. Yuen, “Performance analysis of RIS-aided high-mobility wireless systems,” 2025. [Online]. A vailable: https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15375

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Low-complexity channel estimation and passive beamforming for RIS-assisted MIMO systems relying on discrete phase shifts,

    J. An, C. Xu, L. Gan, and L. Hanzo, “Low-complexity channel estimation and passive beamforming for RIS-assisted MIMO systems relying on discrete phase shifts,” IEEE Trans. Com- mun., vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 1245–1260, Feb. 2022

    2022

  14. [14]

    MIMO evolution beyond 5G through reconfigurable intelligent surfaces and fluid antenna systems,

    A. Shojaeifard, K.-K. Wong, K.-F. Tong, Z. Chu, A. Mourad, A. Haghighat, I. Hemadeh, N. T. Nguyen, V. Tapio, and M. Juntti, “MIMO evolution beyond 5G through reconfigurable intelligent surfaces and fluid antenna systems,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1244–1265, Sept. 2022

    2022

  15. [15]

    Beamforming optimization for wireless network aided by intelligent reflecting surface with discrete phase shifts,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Beamforming optimization for wireless network aided by intelligent reflecting surface with discrete phase shifts,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1838– 1851, Mar. 2020

    2020

  16. [16]

    Beyond massive MIMO: The potential of data transmission with large intelligent surfaces,

    S. Hu, F. Rusek, and O. Edfors, “Beyond massive MIMO: The potential of data transmission with large intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 2746–2758, May 2018

    2018

  17. [17]

    Intelligent reflecting surface vs. decode-and-forward: How large surfaces are needed to beat relaying?

    E. Björnson, O. Ö., and E. G. Larsson, “Intelligent reflecting surface vs. decode-and-forward: How large surfaces are needed to beat relaying?” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 244–248, Feb. 2020

    2020

  18. [18]

    Statistical CSI- based design for reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided massive MIMO systems with direct links,

    K. Zhi, C. Pan, H. Ren, and K. Wang, “Statistical CSI- based design for reconfigurable intelligent surface-aided massive MIMO systems with direct links,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1128–1132, May 2021

    2021

  19. [19]

    Parafac-based channel estimation for intelligent reflective surface assisted MIMO system,

    G. T. de Araújo and A. L. F. de Almeida, “Parafac-based channel estimation for intelligent reflective surface assisted MIMO system,” in Proc. IEEE Sens. Array Multichannel Signal Process. Workshop (SAM), Hangzhou, China, 2020, pp. 1–5

    2020

  20. [20]

    Channel estimation for reconfigurable intelligent surface aided multi- user mmwave MIMO systems,

    J. Chen, Y.-C. Liang, H. V. Cheng, and W. Yu, “Channel estimation for reconfigurable intelligent surface aided multi- user mmwave MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 6853–6869, Oct. 2023

    2023

  21. [21]

    RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO systems for 6G: Fundamentals, system design, and applications,

    E. Shi, J. Zhang, H. Du, B. Ai, C. Yuen, D. Niyato, K. B. Letaief, and X. Shen, “RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO systems for 6G: Fundamentals, system design, and applications,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 331–364, Apr. 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    Multicell MIMO communications relying on intelligent reflecting surfaces,

    C. Pan, H. Ren, K. Wang, W. Xu, M. Elkashlan, A. Nal- lanathan, and L. Hanzo, “Multicell MIMO communications relying on intelligent reflecting surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 5218–5233, Aug. 2020

    2020

  23. [23]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface aided cell-free MIMO com- munications,

    Y. Zhang, B. Di, H. Zhang, J. Lin, Y. Li, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface aided cell-free MIMO com- munications,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 775–779, Apr. 2021

    2021

  24. [24]

    MISO wireless communication systems via intelligent reflecting surfacess: Joint active and passive beamforming optimization,

    X. Yu, D. Xu, and R. Schober, “MISO wireless communication systems via intelligent reflecting surfacess: Joint active and passive beamforming optimization,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 408–424, Jan. 2024

    2024

  25. [25]

    RIS-assisted spectrum sharing between MIMO radar and MU-MISO com- munication systems,

    X. Wang, Z. Fei, J. Guo, Z. Zheng, and B. Li, “RIS-assisted spectrum sharing between MIMO radar and MU-MISO com- munication systems,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 594–598, Mar. 2021

    2021

  26. [26]

    MIMO transmission through reconfigurable intelligent surface: System design, analysis, and implementation,

    W. Tang, J. Y. Dai, M. Z. Chen, K.-K. Wong, X. Li, X. Zhao, S. Jin, Q. Cheng, and T. J. Cui, “MIMO transmission through reconfigurable intelligent surface: System design, analysis, and implementation,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2683–2699, Nov. 2020

    2020

  27. [27]

    Alternating minimization algorithms for hybrid precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems,

    X. Yu, J. Shen, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Alternating minimization algorithms for hybrid precoding in millimeter wave MIMO systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 485–500, 2016

    2016

  28. [28]

    RIS configuration, beamformer design, and power control in single-cell and multi-cell wireless networks,

    S. Buzzi, C. D’Andrea, A. Zappone, M. Fresia, Y.-P. Zhang, and S. Feng, “RIS configuration, beamformer design, and power control in single-cell and multi-cell wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 398–411, June 2021

    2021

  29. [29]

    Robust beamforming for reconfigurable intelligent surface- assisted multi-cell downlink transmissions,

    H. Gao, X. Yang, N. Chen, S. Chen, Y. Yang, and C. Yuen, “Robust beamforming for reconfigurable intelligent surface- assisted multi-cell downlink transmissions,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 6910–6922, May 2024

    2024

  30. [30]

    Secure wireless communica- tion via intelligent reflecting surface,

    M. Cui, G. Zhang, and R. Zhang, “Secure wireless communica- tion via intelligent reflecting surface,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1410–1414, Oct. 2019

    2019

  31. [31]

    Secrecy rate maximization for intelligent reflecting surface assisted multiantenna communications,

    H. Shen, W. Xu, W. Xu, S. Gong, Z. He, and C. Zhao, “Secrecy rate maximization for intelligent reflecting surface assisted multiantenna communications,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1488–1492, Sept. 2019

    2019

  32. [32]

    Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for efficient holographic MIMO communications in 6G,

    J. An, C. Xu, D. W. K. Ng, G. C. Alexandropoulos, C. Huang, C. Yuen, and L. Hanzo, “Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for efficient holographic MIMO communications in 6G,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 2380–2396, Aug. 2023

    2023

  33. [33]

    Joint AP-UE association and precoding for SIM-aided cell- free massive MIMO systems,

    E. Shi, J. Zhang, J. An, G. Zhang, Z. Liu, C. Yuen, and B. Ai, “Joint AP-UE association and precoding for SIM-aided cell- free massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 5352–5367, Jun. 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    Uplink performance of stacked intelligent metasurface-enhanced cell- free massive MIMO systems,

    E. Shi, J. Zhang, Y. Zhu, J. An, C. Yuen, and B. Ai, “Uplink performance of stacked intelligent metasurface-enhanced cell- free massive MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 3731–3746, May 2025

    2025

  35. [35]

    Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for wireless communications: Applications and challenges,

    H. Liu, J. An, X. Jia, L. Gan, G. K. Karagiannidis, B. Clerckx, M. Bennis, M. Debbah, and T. J. Cui, “Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for wireless communications: Applications and challenges,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 46– 53, Aug. 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    Stacked intelligent metasurface- aided MIMO transceiver design,

    J. An, C. Yuen, C. Xu, H. Li, D. W. K. Ng, M. D. Renzo, M. Debbah, and L. Hanzo, “Stacked intelligent metasurface- aided MIMO transceiver design,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 123–131, Aug. 2024

    2024

  37. [37]

    Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for multiuser downlink beam- forming in the wave domain,

    J. An, M. D. Renzo, M. Debbah, H. V. Poor, and C. Yuen, “Stacked intelligent metasurfaces for multiuser downlink beam- forming in the wave domain,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 5525–5538, Jul. 2025

    2025

  38. [38]

    Fundamentals of wireless communi- cation,

    D. Tse and P. Viswanath, “Fundamentals of wireless communi- cation,” 2005

    2005

  39. [39]

    Soft shape-programmable surfaces by fast electromagnetic actuation of liquid metal net- works,

    X. Ni, H. Luan, J. T. Kim et al., “Soft shape-programmable surfaces by fast electromagnetic actuation of liquid metal net- works,” Nat. Commun., vol. 13, p. 5576, Sep. 2022

    2022

  40. [40]

    A dynamically reprogrammable surface with self-evolving shape morphing,

    Y. Bai, H. Wang, Y. Xue, Y. Pan, J.-T. Kim, X. Ni, T.-L. Liu, Y. Yang, M. Han, and Y. e. a. Huang, “A dynamically reprogrammable surface with self-evolving shape morphing,” Nature, vol. 609, no. 7928, pp. 701–708, Jul. 2022

    2022

  41. [41]

    Recon- figurable shape-morphing flexible surfaces realized by individu- ally addressable photoactuator arrays,

    D. Niu, W. Jiang, D. Li, G. Ye, F. Luo, and H. Liu, “Recon- figurable shape-morphing flexible surfaces realized by individu- ally addressable photoactuator arrays,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 30, no. 12, p. 125032, Dec. 2021

    2021

  42. [42]

    Flexible metasurfaces for multifunctional interfaces,

    Y. Zhou, S. Wang, J. Yin, J. Wang, F. Manshaii, X. Xiao, T. Zhang, H. Bao, S. Jiang, and J. Chen, “Flexible metasurfaces for multifunctional interfaces,” ACS Nano, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2685–2707, Jan. 2024

    2024

  43. [43]

    Intelligent reflecting surface enhanced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface enhanced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 5394–5409, Nov. 2019

    2019

  44. [44]

    Weighted sum-rate maximization for reconfigurable intelligent surface aided wireless networks,

    H. Guo, Y.-C. Liang, J. Chen, and E. G. Larsson, “Weighted sum-rate maximization for reconfigurable intelligent surface aided wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 3064–3076, May 2020

    2020

  45. [45]

    Flexible intelligent metasurfaces for enhancing MIMO commu- nications,

    J. An, Z. Han, D. Niyato, M. Debbah, C. Yuen, and L. Hanzo, “Flexible intelligent metasurfaces for enhancing MIMO commu- nications,” IEEE Trans. Commun., pp. 1–1, Mar. 2025

    2025

  46. [46]

    Flexible intelligent metasurfaces for downlink mul- tiuser MISO communications,

    J. An, C. Yuen, M. Di Renzo, M. Debbah, H. V. Poor, and L. Hanzo, “Flexible intelligent metasurfaces for downlink mul- tiuser MISO communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2940–2955, Apr. 2025

    2025

  47. [47]

    Flexible intelligent metasurfaces in high-mobility MIMO integrated sensing and communications,

    K. R. R. Ranasinghe, J. An, I. A. M. Sandoval, H. S. Rou, G. T. F. de Abreu, C. Yuen, and M. Debbah, “Flexible intelligent metasurfaces in high-mobility MIMO integrated sensing and communications,” 2025. [Online]. A vailable: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.18793

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Flexible intelligent metasurface for enhancing multi-target wireless sens- ing,

    Z. Teng, J. An, L. Gan, N. Al-Dhahir, and Z. Han, “Flexible intelligent metasurface for enhancing multi-target wireless sens- ing,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., pp. 1–6, 2025, early Access Article

    2025

  49. [49]

    Emerging technologies in intelligent metasurfaces: Shaping the future of wireless communications,

    J. An, M. Debbah, T. J. Cui, Z. N. Chen, and C. Yuen, “Emerging technologies in intelligent metasurfaces: Shaping the future of wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., pp. 1–1, 2025, early Access Article

    2025

  50. [50]

    Flexible intelligent metasurface-aided wireless communications: Architecture and performance,

    S. Yang, Z. Wan, B. Ning, W. Mei, J. An, Y. C. Eldar, and C. Yuen, “Flexible intelligent metasurface-aided wireless communications: Architecture and performance,” 2025. [Online]. A vailable: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11112

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Flexible intelligent metasurface for reconfiguring radio environments,

    H. Hu, J. An, L. Gan, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Flexible intelligent metasurface for reconfiguring radio environments,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol, pp. 1–6, Oct. 2025

    2025

  52. [52]

    An iteratively weighted mmse approach to distributed sum-utility maximiza- tion for a MIMO interfering broadcast channel,

    Q. Shi, M. Razaviyayn, Z. Q. Luo, and C. He, “An iteratively weighted mmse approach to distributed sum-utility maximiza- tion for a MIMO interfering broadcast channel,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 4331–4340, Sept. 2011

    2011

  53. [53]

    Transmit MIMO radar beampattern design via optimization on the complex circle manifold,

    K. Alhujaili, V. Monga, and M. Rangaswamy, “Transmit MIMO radar beampattern design via optimization on the complex circle manifold,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 13, pp. 3561–3575, Jul. 2019

    2019

  54. [54]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for ris/irs-aided wireless systems,

    C. Pan, H. Ren, K. Wang, J. Xu, W. Li, Y. He, and Y.-C. Zhang, “An overview of signal processing techniques for ris/irs-aided wireless systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 883–917, Aug. 2022

    2022

  55. [55]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces with liquid crystal technology: A hardware design and communication perspective,

    A. Jiménez-Sáez, A. Asadi, R. Neuder, M. Delbari, and V. Jamali, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces with liquid crystal technology: A hardware design and communication perspective,” 2023. [Online]. A vailable: https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2308.03065 Hanwen Hu (Member, IEEE) received the B.S. degree in Information Engineering from Northwestern Polytechnical Un...

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    His research interests include wireless communications systems and networks, signal processing, and optical wireless communications

    He is currently a Professor with the Elec- trical and Computer Engineering Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessa- loniki, Greece, and the Head of the Wire- less Communications and Information Pro- cessing (WCIP) Group. His research interests include wireless communications systems and networks, signal processing, and optical wireless co...

    2021