pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08039 · v1 · pith:KYJB3XJHnew · submitted 2026-06-06 · 💻 cs.RO

MuJoCo-Drones-Gym: A GPU-Accelerated Multi-Drone Simulator for Control and Reinforcement Learning

Manan Tayal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 19:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords multi-drone simulatorMuJoCoreinforcement learningquadcopterGymnasiummulti-agent RLaerial roboticsCrazyflie
0
0 comments X

The pith

MuJoCo-Drones-Gym supplies a modular Gymnasium environment for simulating any number of Crazyflie quadcopters with selectable physics, actions, and observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents MuJoCo-Drones-Gym as an open-source simulator built on the MuJoCo physics engine to support multi-drone control and reinforcement learning research. It addresses trade-offs in prior environments by combining physical fidelity, multi-agent capability, and high throughput for modern RL pipelines. The design exposes a modular API so users can choose among rigid-body or explicit dynamics, various action types such as motor RPMs or PID commands, and observation formats including camera images or neighborhood data. A PettingZoo wrapper enables multi-agent training, and seven built-in tasks ranging from hover to gate racing illustrate the interface. The work mirrors examples from the related gym-pybullet-drones project while claiming benefits from MuJoCo's contact handling, rendering, and parallelization.

Core claim

MuJoCo-Drones-Gym is a Gymnasium-compatible multi-drone environment on the MuJoCo engine that supports arbitrary numbers of Bitcraze Crazyflie 2.x nano-quadcopters through a modular API for physics models, action interfaces, and observation spaces, together with a PettingZoo ParallelEnv wrapper and a suite of seven task environments.

What carries the argument

The modular API that lets users select the physics model (rigid-body MuJoCo or explicit Python dynamics with optional ground effect, blade drag, and inter-drone downwash), action interface (per-motor RPMs, collective thrust, velocity setpoints, or PID waypoints), and observation space (kinematic states, cameras, or adjacency information).

If this is right

  • A PettingZoo ParallelEnv wrapper enables direct use in multi-agent reinforcement learning frameworks without additional wrappers.
  • Seven task environments (hover, velocity tracking, multi-drone hover, waypoint navigation, formation flight, gate racing, and a generic template) cover single-agent and multi-agent scenarios.
  • Users can mix and match subsets of aerodynamic effects such as ground effect, blade drag, and downwash within the same simulation run.
  • The environment supports both rigid-body MuJoCo dynamics and explicit Python dynamics for the same quadcopter model.
  • Observation spaces can include RGB, depth, or segmentation camera renders alongside kinematic state vectors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The modular selection of physics and action types could simplify ablation studies that isolate the effect of specific aerodynamic terms on learned policies.
  • Because the simulator is built on MuJoCo, it may integrate more readily with existing MuJoCo-based robot arms or manipulators for combined aerial-ground tasks.
  • Parallelizability improvements could reduce wall-clock time for large-scale hyperparameter sweeps in multi-drone policy training.
  • The open-source release and Gymnasium compatibility lower the barrier for reproducing control and learning results across different research groups.

Load-bearing premise

That MuJoCo's contact handling, rendering, and parallelizability deliver practically useful speed or accuracy gains for RL training pipelines over existing simulators.

What would settle it

A side-by-side benchmark on identical hover or formation tasks showing that training throughput and final policy performance remain unchanged or worse when switching from gym-pybullet-drones to MuJoCo-Drones-Gym.

read the original abstract

Robotic simulators are a cornerstone of modern research in aerial robotics, serving both as a vehicle for the development of new control algorithms and as the data source for training reinforcement learning (RL) policies. Yet, existing quadcopter learning environments often face a trade-off between physical fidelity, multi-agent support, and the throughput required by modern deep RL pipelines. In this paper, we present MuJoCo-Drones-Gym, an open-source Gymnasium-compatible multi-drone environment built on top of the MuJoCo physics engine. MuJoCo-Drones-Gym supports an arbitrary number of Bitcraze Crazyflie 2.x nano-quadcopters and exposes a modular API for selecting (i)~the physics model (rigid-body MuJoCo, explicit Python dynamics, or any subset of ground effect, blade drag, and inter-drone downwash), (ii)~the action interface (per-motor RPMs, collective normalized thrust, velocity setpoints, or PID waypoint commands), and (iii)~the observation space (kinematic state vectors, RGB / depth / segmentation cameras, or neighbourhood adjacency information). A PettingZoo ParallelEnv wrapper enables drop-in multi-agent reinforcement learning, while a suite of seven task environments, hover, velocity tracking, multi-drone hover, waypoint navigation, formation flight, gate racing, and a generic multi-agent template, demonstrates the breadth of the interface. We describe the environment design, the underlying physics and quadcopter dynamics, and illustrate its use through control and learning examples that mirror those of the closely related gym-pybullet-drones project, while taking advantage of MuJoCo's improved contact handling, rendering, and parallelizability.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces MuJoCo-Drones-Gym, an open-source Gymnasium-compatible multi-drone simulator built on the MuJoCo physics engine. It supports an arbitrary number of Bitcraze Crazyflie 2.x quadcopters with a modular API for selecting physics models (rigid-body MuJoCo, explicit Python dynamics, subsets of ground effect/blade drag/downwash), action interfaces (motor RPMs, collective thrust, velocity setpoints, PID waypoints), and observation spaces (kinematic states, RGB/depth/segmentation cameras, neighbourhood adjacency). A PettingZoo ParallelEnv wrapper is provided for multi-agent RL, along with seven task environments (hover, velocity tracking, multi-drone hover, waypoint navigation, formation flight, gate racing, generic multi-agent template). The work claims advantages in contact handling, rendering, and parallelizability over gym-pybullet-drones, with the title advertising GPU acceleration.

Significance. If the implementation delivers substantiated throughput gains and the modular features function as described, the environment could serve as a practical tool for control and multi-agent RL research in aerial robotics by offering improved fidelity in contacts and rendering relative to prior simulators.

major comments (2)
  1. [Title and Abstract] Title and Abstract: The title explicitly advertises 'GPU-Accelerated', but the abstract only cites 'MuJoCo's improved contact handling, rendering, and parallelizability' with no reference to MJX, JAX, any GPU backend, or any timing benchmarks. Standard MuJoCo is CPU-only; this mismatch directly undermines the central claim of practically useful throughput gains for RL pipelines.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: No implementation section, code examples, performance tables, or validation results are described to establish the physics models, modular API behavior, or any speedup over gym-pybullet-drones, leaving the soundness of the claimed advantages unassessable from the manuscript text.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The seven task environments are listed without cross-references to their later descriptions or implementation details, which would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive criticism. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Title and Abstract] Title and Abstract: The title explicitly advertises 'GPU-Accelerated', but the abstract only cites 'MuJoCo's improved contact handling, rendering, and parallelizability' with no reference to MJX, JAX, any GPU backend, or any timing benchmarks. Standard MuJoCo is CPU-only; this mismatch directly undermines the central claim of practically useful throughput gains for RL pipelines.

    Authors: We acknowledge the inconsistency between the title and abstract. The reference to parallelizability in the abstract is intended to encompass MuJoCo's MJX backend for JAX-based GPU acceleration, which the implementation supports for high-throughput RL. However, we agree that this is not made explicit. We will revise the abstract to reference MJX/JAX support and note any available throughput information from the code base. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No implementation section, code examples, performance tables, or validation results are described to establish the physics models, modular API behavior, or any speedup over gym-pybullet-drones, leaving the soundness of the claimed advantages unassessable from the manuscript text.

    Authors: The manuscript text describes the design, physics models, modular API, and provides control and learning examples that parallel those in gym-pybullet-drones. We agree, however, that explicit performance tables, direct speedup benchmarks, and additional validation results are absent. We will add a dedicated section with implementation details, usage examples, and comparative benchmarks to substantiate the claimed advantages. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: software description paper with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper is a description of a new open-source simulator (MuJoCo-Drones-Gym) with modular API, task environments, and PettingZoo wrapper. No equations, first-principles derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided abstract or described content. The contribution consists of implementation details and comparisons to gym-pybullet-drones, which are external benchmarks rather than self-referential reductions. Any discrepancy between the title's 'GPU-Accelerated' phrasing and the text's reference to MuJoCo parallelizability is a factual or marketing issue, not a circularity in any claimed derivation. The paper is self-contained as a tool release with no load-bearing steps that reduce to their own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a software tool paper; the central contribution is an implemented environment rather than a derivation resting on free parameters, axioms, or new physical entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5841 in / 1147 out tokens · 28915 ms · 2026-06-27T19:51:32.772704+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Learning to fly—a gym environment with pybullet physics for reinforcement learning of multi-agent quadcopter con- trol,

    J. Panerati, H. Zheng, S. Zhou, J. Xu, A. Prorok, and A. P. Schoellig, “Learning to fly—a gym environment with pybullet physics for reinforcement learning of multi-agent quadcopter con- trol,” in2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2021

    2021

  2. [2]

    MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control,

    E. Todorov, T. Erez, and Y. Tassa, “MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control,” in IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2012, pp. 5026–5033

    2012

  3. [3]

    Gymnasium: A Standard Interface for Reinforcement Learning Environments

    M. Towerset al., “Gymnasium: A standard interface for reinforcement learning environments,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17032, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    PettingZoo: Gym for multi-agent reinforcement learning,

    J. Terry, B. Black, N. Grammel, M. Jayakumar, A. Hari, R. Sullivan, L. S. Santos, C. Di- effendahl, C. Horsch, R. Perez-Vicente, N. Williams, Y. Lokesh, and P. Ravi, “PettingZoo: Gym for multi-agent reinforcement learning,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021

    2021

  5. [5]

    MJX: MuJoCo XLA – GPU/TPU-accelerated MuJoCo,

    Google DeepMind, “MJX: MuJoCo XLA – GPU/TPU-accelerated MuJoCo,” https://mujoco. readthedocs.io/en/stable/mjx.html, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    JAX: Composable transfor- mations of Python+NumPy programs,

    J. Bradbury, R. Frostig, P. Hawkins, M. J. Johnson, C. Leary, D. Maclaurin, G. Necula, A. Paszke, J. VanderPlas, S. Wanderman-Milne, and Q. Zhang, “JAX: Composable transfor- mations of Python+NumPy programs,” http://github.com/google/jax, 2018

    2018

  7. [7]

    MuJoCo-drones-gym: MuJoCo Multi-Drone Gymnasium Environments for Re- inforcement Learning,

    M. Tayal, “MuJoCo-drones-gym: MuJoCo Multi-Drone Gymnasium Environments for Re- inforcement Learning,” https://github.com/tau-intelligence/MuJoCo-drones-gym, 2026, ac- cessed: 2026-06-06

    2026

  8. [8]

    System identification of the Crazyflie 2.0 nano quadrocopter,

    J. F¨ orster, “System identification of the Crazyflie 2.0 nano quadrocopter,” Master’s thesis, ETH Z¨ urich, 2015

    2015

  9. [9]

    MuJoCo Menagerie: A collec- tion of high-quality simulation models for MuJoCo,

    K. Zakka, Y. Tassa, and MuJoCo Menagerie Contributors, “MuJoCo Menagerie: A collec- tion of high-quality simulation models for MuJoCo,” https://github.com/google-deepmind/ mujoco menagerie, 2022

    2022

  10. [10]

    Neural lander: Stable drone landing control using learned dynamics,

    G. Shi, X. Shi, M. O’Connell, R. Yu, K. Azizzadenesheli, A. Anandkumar, Y. Yue, and S.-J. Chung, “Neural lander: Stable drone landing control using learned dynamics,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2019, pp. 9784–9790

    2019

  11. [11]

    safe- control-gym: A unified benchmark suite for safe learning-based control and reinforcement learning in robotics,

    Z. Yuan, A. W. Hall, S. Zhou, L. Brunke, M. Greeff, J. Panerati, and A. P. Schoellig, “safe- control-gym: A unified benchmark suite for safe learning-based control and reinforcement learning in robotics,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 11 142–11 149, 2022

    2022

  12. [12]

    Flightmare: A flexible quadrotor simulator,

    Y. Song, S. Naji, E. Kaufmann, A. Loquercio, and D. Scaramuzza, “Flightmare: A flexible quadrotor simulator,” inProc. Conf. on Robot Learning (CoRL), 2020

    2020

  13. [13]

    OmniDrones: An efficient and flexible platform for reinforcement learning in drone control,

    B. Xu, F. Xia, and J. Liu, “OmniDrones: An efficient and flexible platform for reinforcement learning in drone control,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024. 17 MuJoCo-Drones-GymτTau Intelligence

    2024

  14. [14]

    Military specification: Flying qualities of piloted air- planes,

    United States Department of Defense, “Military specification: Flying qualities of piloted air- planes,” U.S. Department of Defense, Tech. Rep. MIL-F-8785C, 1980

    1980

  15. [15]

    Domain randomiza- tion for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world,

    J. Tobin, R. Fong, A. Ray, J. Schneider, W. Zaremba, and P. Abbeel, “Domain randomiza- tion for transferring deep neural networks from simulation to the real world,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2017, pp. 23–30

    2017

  16. [16]

    Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Hand

    OpenAI, I. Akkaya, M. Andrychowicz, M. Chociej, M. Litwin, B. McGrew, A. Petron, A. Paino, M. Plappert, G. Powell, R. Ribas, J. Schneider, N. Tezak, J. Tworek, P. Welinder, L. Weng, Q. Yuan, W. Zaremba, and L. Zhang, “Solving Rubik’s cube with a robot hand,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.07113, 2019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  17. [17]

    RLlib: Abstractions for distributed reinforcement learning,

    E. Liang, R. Liaw, R. Nishihara, P. Moritz, R. Fox, K. Goldberg, J. Gonzalez, M. Jordan, and I. Stoica, “RLlib: Abstractions for distributed reinforcement learning,” inProc. Int. Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML), vol. 80, 2018, pp. 3053–3062

    2018

  18. [18]

    Control barrier functions in dynamic uavs for kinematic obstacle avoidance: A collision cone approach,

    M. Tayal, R. Singh, J. Keshavan, and S. Kolathaya, “Control barrier functions in dynamic uavs for kinematic obstacle avoidance: A collision cone approach,” in2024 American Control Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2024, pp. 3722–3727

    2024

  19. [19]

    Design of a Trajectory Tracking Controller for a Nanoquadcopter

    C. Luis and J. Le Ny, “Design of a trajectory tracking controller for a nanoquadcopter,” Polytechnique Montreal, Tech. Rep., 2016, arXiv:1608.05786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Geometric tracking control of a quadrotor UAV on SE(3),

    T. Lee, M. Leok, and N. H. McClamroch, “Geometric tracking control of a quadrotor UAV on SE(3),” in49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2010, pp. 5420–5425

    2010

  21. [21]

    Stable-Baselines3: Reliable reinforcement learning implementations,

    A. Raffin, A. Hill, A. Gleave, A. Kanervisto, M. Ernestus, and N. Dormann, “Stable-Baselines3: Reliable reinforcement learning implementations,”Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 22, no. 268, pp. 1–8, 2021. 18

    2021