pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08780 · v1 · pith:VTDB754Xnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · 💻 cs.CV

Beyond Consistency: Preserving Temporal Structure in Zero-Shot Video Editing

Deyin Liu , Yisheng Ding , Zhe Jin , Xiatian Zhu , Anjan Dutta , Lin Wu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 18:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords zero-shot video editingtemporal structure preservationdiffusion modelssemantic clip partitioninganchor framestoken mergingvideo narrative
0
0 comments X

The pith

Zero-shot video editing preserves original temporal structure by partitioning into semantic clips and selecting anchor frames.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Existing zero-shot video editing methods using pre-trained diffusion models achieve spatial control and basic temporal consistency but fail to maintain the video's high-level narrative, rhythm, and semantic flow. The paper introduces a method that adaptively partitions the video into semantically distinct clips based on feature similarity, selects representative anchor frames, applies clip-adaptive token merging, and uses an alternating combination strategy. This matters for producing narratively coherent edited videos, especially long ones with complex semantic variations, while maintaining efficiency. A sympathetic reader would care because it addresses a key limitation in making edited videos usable for storytelling or analysis.

Core claim

The central claim is that by adaptively partitioning the video into semantically distinct clips based on feature similarity and selecting a representative anchor frame for each clip, enhanced by clip-adaptive token merging leveraging the anchor's semantic dominance and an alternating combination strategy for inter-clip transitions, zero-shot video editing can preserve the source video's temporal structure for the first time.

What carries the argument

Adaptive semantic clip partitioning with anchor frame selection and clip-adaptive token merging, which uses the anchor to stabilize editing within clips.

If this is right

  • Long videos with complex semantic variations can be edited while keeping narrative coherence and avoiding semantic ambiguity.
  • Edited outputs achieve higher fidelity by balancing intra-clip stability and inter-clip seamless transitions.
  • Computational efficiency is improved through the token merging strategy without sacrificing structure preservation.
  • State-of-the-art results are set for zero-shot video editing fidelity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach might apply to preserving structure in other media like audio or 3D animations edited via diffusion.
  • Future work could test if the partitioning method works equally well on videos with gradual vs abrupt semantic changes.
  • Integrating this with different pre-trained models could show if the structure preservation is model-agnostic.

Load-bearing premise

Partitioning the video based on feature similarity and selecting representative anchor frames will accurately capture and preserve the high-level narrative and semantic flow of the original video.

What would settle it

A comparison experiment where edited videos are rated for narrative coherence and semantic flow preservation on a set of long videos with varying complexity, showing no improvement over baseline methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08780 by Anjan Dutta, Deyin Liu, Lin Wu, Xiatian Zhu, Yisheng Ding, Zhe Jin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Qualitative comparison with failure cases of one prior representative method. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Our method first captures the temporal structure of the source video and then uses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overview of the proposed video editing method. We first capture the source video’s temporal structure via Adaptive Video Partition and Anchor Frame Selection. Guided by the structure, a pre-trained T2I diffusion model progressively denoises DDIM-inverted noisy la￾tents to generate new frames. In each timestep, clip-adaptive token merging/unmerging around self-attention enhances short-term consistency and r… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A qualitative comparison of our method with baseline methods on long video datasets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A qualitative comparison of our method with baseline methods on short video datasets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ablation on Adaptive Video Partition and Anchor Frames Selection (AVP-AFS). With [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ablation on Clip-adaptive Token Merging: At a low merging ratio (Fixed ratio1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Existing zero-shot video editing methods rely on pre-trained diffusion models, successfully achieving spatial control and basic temporal consistency but fundamentally fail to preserve the video's original temporal structure.This distinction is critical: temporal consistency ensures visual smoothness, but temporal structure dictates the video's high-level narrative, rhythm, and semantic flow. Without this preservation, the edited output, especially for long videos with complex semantic variations, becomes narratively incoherent and semantically ambiguous. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel zero-shot editing approach that, for the first time, explicitly focuses on preserving the source video's temporal structure. We achieve this by adaptively partitioning the video into semantically distinct clips based on feature similarity and selecting a representative anchor frame for each clip. To enhance both intra-clip fidelity and computational efficiency, we design a clip-adaptive token merging strategy which leverages the anchor's semantic dominance to stabilize the editing. Furthermore, we employ an alternating combination strategy that ensures seamless inter-clip transitions while maintaining semantic distinction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art results, successfully balancing the preservation of original temporal structure with computational efficiency, and setting a new benchmark for zero-shot video editing fidelity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that prior zero-shot video editing methods achieve spatial control and temporal consistency but fail to preserve temporal structure (high-level narrative, rhythm, and semantic flow), leading to incoherent outputs on long videos. It introduces an approach that adaptively partitions the input video into clips via feature similarity, selects representative anchor frames per clip, applies clip-adaptive token merging that exploits anchor dominance, and uses an alternating combination strategy for inter-clip transitions. The authors assert that this yields state-of-the-art fidelity while remaining computationally efficient.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would usefully distinguish temporal consistency from structure preservation and supply a practical zero-shot pipeline for semantically complex videos. The efficiency focus via token merging is a concrete engineering contribution. However, the significance is limited by the absence of any reported validation that the feature-similarity partitions align with narrative boundaries rather than low-level appearance.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'adaptively partitioning the video into semantically distinct clips based on feature similarity' preserves high-level narrative and semantic flow is load-bearing yet unsupported. No ablation, correlation with ground-truth narrative boundaries, or human study is described to show that standard embeddings (CLIP, DINO, etc.) produce partitions that respect story-level semantics rather than visual similarity; without this, the distinction from prior consistency-only methods cannot be verified.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and experimental claims: the assertion of 'state-of-the-art results' and 'setting a new benchmark' is made without any reported metrics, baselines, datasets, or quantitative tables. This absence prevents assessment of whether the method actually balances structure preservation against efficiency or outperforms existing approaches on the claimed dimensions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a run-on sentence in the second paragraph that reduces readability; consider splitting for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, acknowledging where additional validation is needed and outlining planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'adaptively partitioning the video into semantically distinct clips based on feature similarity' preserves high-level narrative and semantic flow is load-bearing yet unsupported. No ablation, correlation with ground-truth narrative boundaries, or human study is described to show that standard embeddings (CLIP, DINO, etc.) produce partitions that respect story-level semantics rather than visual similarity; without this, the distinction from prior consistency-only methods cannot be verified.

    Authors: We agree that validating the semantic alignment of feature-similarity partitions is essential to support the central claim. The manuscript provides qualitative demonstrations and efficiency comparisons, but lacks the requested ablations and human evaluation. We will add an ablation study evaluating CLIP, DINO, and other embeddings on partition quality, plus a human study assessing narrative alignment. Ground-truth narrative boundary annotations are unavailable in standard datasets, precluding direct correlation metrics, but the human study will provide perceptual validation of the distinction from consistency-only methods. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and experimental claims: the assertion of 'state-of-the-art results' and 'setting a new benchmark' is made without any reported metrics, baselines, datasets, or quantitative tables. This absence prevents assessment of whether the method actually balances structure preservation against efficiency or outperforms existing approaches on the claimed dimensions.

    Authors: The abstract summarizes the outcomes, while the experiments section of the manuscript reports quantitative metrics, baseline comparisons against prior zero-shot methods, datasets used, and tables demonstrating SOTA fidelity and efficiency. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract to explicitly reference the key metrics, baselines, and datasets supporting the SOTA claim, allowing readers to evaluate the balance between structure preservation and efficiency directly from the abstract. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; method components are independently defined

full rationale

The paper introduces a new zero-shot video editing pipeline consisting of adaptive partitioning by feature similarity, anchor-frame selection per clip, clip-adaptive token merging, and an alternating inter-clip combination strategy. None of these steps are shown to reduce by construction to the inputs via self-definition, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The abstract and described approach present the techniques as novel design choices whose claimed benefit (preservation of temporal structure) is asserted on the basis of the design itself rather than tautological equivalence. No equations or derivation steps are provided that equate outputs to inputs by construction. This is the normal case of an independent methodological contribution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract does not specify any free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5747 in / 891 out tokens · 16421 ms · 2026-06-27T18:47:30.217308+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Sohl-Dickstein, E

    J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. A. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, S. Ganguli, Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics, in: ICML, 2015, pp. 2256–2265

    2015

  2. [2]

    J. Ho, A. Jain, P. Abbeel, Denoising diffusion probabilistic models, in: NeurIPS, 2020, pp. 6840–6851

    2020

  3. [3]

    A. Q. Nichol, P. Dhariwal, Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic mod- els, in: ICML, 2021, pp. 8162–8171

    2021

  4. [4]

    Rombach, A

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, B. Ommer, High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models, in: CVPR, 2022, pp. 10674–10685

    2022

  5. [5]

    T. Zhen, J. Cao, X. Sun, J. Pan, Z. Ji, Y . Pang, Token-aware and step-aware acceleration for stable diffusion, Pattern Recognition (2025) 111479. 29

    2025

  6. [6]

    Dhariwal, A

    P. Dhariwal, A. Q. Nichol, Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis, in: NeurIPS, 2021, pp. 8780–8794

    2021

  7. [7]

    Z. Chen, Z. Zhao, Y . Luo, Y . Li, X. Tao, Z. Huang, Fastedit: fast text- guided single-image editing via semantic-aware diffusion fine-tuning, Pat- tern Recognition (2026) 112583

    2026

  8. [8]

    Q. Liu, X. Fu, H. Zhang, C. Long, J. Han, C. Moreira, X. Ning, X. Bai, Hy- brideditdif: Text and exemplar guided image editing with diffusion models, Pattern Recognition (2026) 112510

    2026

  9. [9]

    C. Xiao, Q. Yang, X. Xu, J. Zhang, F. Zhou, C. Zhang, Where you edit is what you get: Text-guided image editing with region-based attention, Pattern Recognition (2023) 109458

    2023

  10. [10]

    Ian Chan, H

    W. Ian Chan, H. Santo, Y . Matsushita, F. Okura, Instance-wise distribu- tion control of text-to-image diffusion models, Pattern Recognition (2026) 112614

    2026

  11. [11]

    Croitoru, V

    F. Croitoru, V . Hondru, R. T. Ionescu, M. Shah, Diffusion models in vision: A survey, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. (2023) 10850–10869

    2023

  12. [12]

    J. Ho, T. Salimans, A. Gritsenko, W. Chan, M. Norouzi, D. J. Fleet, Video diffusion models, in: NeurIPS, 2022, pp. 8633–8646

    2022

  13. [13]

    J. Ho, W. Chan, C. Saharia, J. Whang, R. Gao, A. Gritsenko, D. P. Kingma, B. Poole, M. Norouzi, D. J. Fleet, et al., Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303 (2022). 30

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Saharia, W

    C. Saharia, W. Chan, S. Saxena, L. Li, J. Whang, E. L. Denton, S. K. S. Ghasemipour, R. G. Lopes, B. K. Ayan, T. Salimans, J. Ho, D. J. Fleet, M. Norouzi, Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep lan- guage understanding, in: NeurIPS, 2022, pp. 36479–36494

    2022

  15. [15]

    J. Z. Wu, Y . Ge, X. Wang, S. W. Lei, Y . Gu, Y . Shi, W. Hsu, Y . Shan, X. Qie, M. Z. Shou, Tune-a-video: One-shot tuning of image diffusion models for text-to-video generation, in: ICCV, 2023, pp. 7589–7599

    2023

  16. [16]

    S. Liu, Y . Zhang, W. Li, Z. Lin, J. Jia, Video-p2p: Video editing with cross- attention control, in: CVPR, 2024, pp. 8599–8608

    2024

  17. [17]

    Zhang, B

    Z. Zhang, B. Li, X. Nie, C. Han, T. Guo, L. Liu, Towards consistent video editing with text-to-image diffusion models, in: NeurIPS, 2023, pp. 58508– 58519

    2023

  18. [18]

    C. Qi, X. Cun, Y . Zhang, C. Lei, X. Wang, Y . Shan, Q. Chen, Fatezero: Fusing attentions for zero-shot text-based video editing, in: ICCV, 2023, pp. 15886–15896

    2023

  19. [19]

    Ceylan, C

    D. Ceylan, C. P. Huang, N. J. Mitra, Pix2video: Video editing using image diffusion, in: ICCV, 2023, pp. 23149–23160

    2023

  20. [20]

    Tumanyan, M

    N. Tumanyan, M. Geyer, S. Bagon, T. Dekel, Plug-and-play diffusion features for text-driven image-to-image translation, in: CVPR, 2023, pp. 1921–1930

    2023

  21. [21]

    Zhang, A

    L. Zhang, A. Rao, M. Agrawala, Adding conditional control to text-to- image diffusion models, in: ICCV, 2023, pp. 3813–3824. 31

    2023

  22. [22]

    Geyer, O

    M. Geyer, O. Bar-Tal, S. Bagon, T. Dekel, Tokenflow: Consistent diffusion features for consistent video editing, in: ICLR, 2024, pp. 20637–20650

    2024

  23. [23]

    X. Li, C. Ma, X. Yang, M. Yang, Vidtome: Video token merging for zero- shot video editing, in: CVPR, 2024, pp. 7486–7495

    2024

  24. [24]

    L. Tang, M. Jia, Q. Wang, C. P. Phoo, B. Hariharan, Emergent correspon- dence from image diffusion, in: NeurIPS, 2023, pp. 1363–1389

    2023

  25. [25]

    Bolya, C

    D. Bolya, C. Fu, X. Dai, P. Zhang, C. Feichtenhofer, J. Hoffman, Token merging: Your vit but faster, in: ICLR, 2023, pp. 1498–1518

    2023

  26. [26]

    Hertz, R

    A. Hertz, R. Mokady, J. Tenenbaum, K. Aberman, Y . Pritch, D. Cohen-Or, Prompt-to-prompt image editing with cross-attention control, in: ICLR, 2023, pp. 14369–14388

    2023

  27. [27]

    Epstein, A

    D. Epstein, A. Jabri, B. Poole, A. A. Efros, A. Holynski, Diffusion self- guidance for controllable image generation, in: NeurIPS, 2023, pp. 16222– 16239

    2023

  28. [28]

    Parmar, K

    G. Parmar, K. K. Singh, R. Zhang, Y . Li, J. Lu, J. Zhu, Zero-shot image-to- image translation, in: ACM SIGGRAPH, 2023, pp. 11:1–11:11

    2023

  29. [29]

    Mokady, A

    R. Mokady, A. Hertz, K. Aberman, Y . Pritch, D. Cohen-Or, Null-text in- version for editing real images using guided diffusion models, in: CVPR, 2023, pp. 6038–6047

    2023

  30. [30]

    Khachatryan, A

    L. Khachatryan, A. Movsisyan, V . Tadevosyan, R. Henschel, Z. Wang, S. Navasardyan, H. Shi, Text2video-zero: Text-to-image diffusion models are zero-shot video generators, in: ICCV, 2023, pp. 15908–15918. 32

    2023

  31. [31]

    S. Yang, Y . Zhou, Z. Liu, C. C. Loy, Rerender A video: Zero-shot text- guided video-to-video translation, in: ACM SIGGRAPH, 2023, pp. 95:1– 95:11

    2023

  32. [32]

    S. Yang, Y . Zhou, Z. Liu, C. C. Loy, Fresco: Spatial-temporal correspon- dence for zero-shot video translation, in: CVPR, 2024, pp. 8703–8712

    2024

  33. [33]

    Y . Cong, M. Xu, C. Simon, S. Chen, J. Ren, Y . Xie, J. Pérez-Rúa, B. Rosen- hahn, T. Xiang, S. He, FLATTEN: optical flow-guided attention for consis- tent text-to-video editing, in: ICLR, 2024, pp. 8826–8847

    2024

  34. [34]

    Cohen, V

    N. Cohen, V . Kulikov, M. Kleiner, I. Huberman-Spiegelglas, T. Michaeli, Slicedit: Zero-shot video editing with text-to-image diffusion models using spatio-temporal slices, in: ICML, 2024, pp. 9109–9137

    2024

  35. [35]

    Blattmann, R

    A. Blattmann, R. Rombach, H. Ling, T. Dockhorn, S. W. Kim, S. Fidler, K. Kreis, Align your latents: High-resolution video synthesis with latent diffusion models, in: CVPR, 2023, pp. 22563–22575

    2023

  36. [36]

    D. P. Kingma, M. Welling, Auto-encoding variational bayes, arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 (2013)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    J. Song, C. Meng, S. Ermon, Denoising diffusion implicit models, in: ICLR, 2021, pp. 14205–14225

    2021

  38. [38]

    A. Q. Nichol, P. Dhariwal, A. Ramesh, P. Shyam, P. Mishkin, B. McGrew, I. Sutskever, M. Chen, GLIDE: towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models, in: ICML, 2022, pp. 16784– 16804. 33

    2022

  39. [39]

    Zhang, Y

    S. Zhang, Y . Liu, H. Zhou, J. Peng, Y . Zhou, X. Sun, R. Ji, Adaflow: Ef- ficient long video editing via adaptive attention slimming and keyframe selection, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05433 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    W. Wang, Y . Jiang, K. Xie, Z. Liu, H. Chen, Y . Cao, X. Wang, C. Shen, Zero-shot video editing using off-the-shelf image diffusion models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17599 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    X. Ju, Y . Gao, Z. Zhang, Z. Yuan, X. Wang, A. Zeng, Y . Xiong, Q. Xu, Y . Shan, Miradata: A large-scale video dataset with long durations and structured captions, in: NeurIPS, 2024, pp. 48955–48970

    2024

  42. [42]

    P. P. Ray, Chatgpt: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope, Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems (2023) 121–154

    2023

  43. [43]

    Jiang, D

    H. Jiang, D. Sun, V . Jampani, M. Yang, E. G. Learned-Miller, J. Kautz, Super slomo: High quality estimation of multiple intermediate frames for video interpolation, in: CVPR, 2018, pp. 9000–9008

    2018

  44. [44]

    Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, E. P. Simoncelli, Image quality as- sessment: from error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE Trans. Image Process. (2004) 600–612

    2004

  45. [45]

    Zhang, P

    R. Zhang, P. Isola, A. A. Efros, E. Shechtman, O. Wang, The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric, in: CVPR, 2018, pp. 586–595

    2018

  46. [46]

    Huang, Y

    Z. Huang, Y . He, J. Yu, F. Zhang, C. Si, Y . Jiang, Y . Zhang, T. Wu, Q. Jin, N. Chanpaisit, Y . Wang, X. Chen, L. Wang, D. Lin, Y . Qiao, Z. Liu, 34 Vbench: Comprehensive benchmark suite for video generative models, in: CVPR, 2024, pp. 21807–21818

    2024

  47. [47]

    Zhang, Y

    Y . Zhang, Y . Wei, D. Jiang, X. Zhang, W. Zuo, Q. Tian, Controlvideo: Training-free controllable text-to-video generation, in: ICLR, 2024, pp. 27266–27287

    2024

  48. [48]

    O. Kara, B. Kurtkaya, H. Yesiltepe, J. M. Rehg, P. Yanardag, RA VE: ran- domized noise shuffling for fast and consistent video editing with diffusion models, in: CVPR, 2024, pp. 6507–6516

    2024

  49. [49]

    X. Yang, L. Zhu, H. Fan, Y . Yang, Videograin: Modulating space-time at- tention for multi-grained video editing, in: ICLR, 2025, pp. 79063–79082. 35

    2025