pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11765 · v1 · pith:IGD675RYnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

A stochastic model for elastoplastic contact of rough surfaces incorporating scale-dependent hardness

Yang Xu , Hengxu Song , Jianqiao Hu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords elastoplastic contactrough surfacesscale-dependent hardnessstochastic modelChapman-Kolmogorov equationsprobability density functionscontact pressure distribution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stochastic theory with compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations models elastoplastic contact of rough surfaces with scale-dependent hardness.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a new stochastic methodology to solve elastoplastic contact problems for rough surfaces where hardness varies with scale. It uses compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations to create three integral equations that track the probability densities of elastic contact pressure, relative plastic contact area, and relative non-contact area as scales change. This framework allows investigation of how scale-dependent hardness affects pressure distribution, contact areas, and the relationship between area and load. The model shows transitions between elastic, elastic-plastic, and fully plastic regimes and introduces a new topographic yield parameter for determining contact status.

Core claim

The paper claims that a novel stochastic process framework based on compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations can solve elastoplastic contact problems involving scale-dependent hardness by formulating three integral equations for the evolution of probability density functions of elastic contact pressure, relative plastic contact area, and relative non-contact area across geometrical scales.

What carries the argument

Compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations applied to probability density functions describing the scale evolution of contact pressure and areas.

If this is right

  • The model predicts smooth transitions from linear elasticity to elastic-plastic behavior and finally to full plasticity when adjusting mechanical and material properties.
  • A new topographic yield parameter incorporating a wider range of material and geometrical properties is derived to aid identification of contact status.
  • Numerical solutions enable highly precise determination of elastic and plastic limits via curve-fitting.
  • A new diagram is provided for rapid identification of contact status.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If valid, this framework could be adapted to model other multiscale phenomena involving roughness, such as in earthquake mechanics or electrical contacts.
  • Testing the model's predictions against direct numerical simulations of specific surface topographies would provide a check on the stochastic representation.

Load-bearing premise

The elastoplastic contact problem with scale-dependent hardness is accurately captured by three integral equations obtained from compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations on the probability densities of pressure and areas evolving across scales.

What would settle it

Experimental measurements of contact area as a function of load for a rough surface with characterized scale-dependent hardness, if they deviate from the model's predictions, would falsify the approach.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11765 by Hengxu Song, Jianqiao Hu, Yang Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A cross-sectional view of the purely normal contact between a rigid flat and a rough [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A graphical illustration of probability flow from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A graphical illustration of probability flow from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Convergence test of linear elastic contact solutions solved by Chapman-Kolmogorov [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Convergence test of elastoplastic contact solutions with constant hardness solved [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Convergence test of elastoplastic contact solutions with scale-dependent hardness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: demonstrates how the competition between H(ζ) (the upper limit of elastic contact pressure) and V (ζ) (redistribution of elastic contact pressure) influences P0(p, ζ) at different magnifications. At low magnification ranges (ζ < 1×105 ), P0(p, ζ) is broadened insignificantly 21 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Evolution of P0(p/H0, ζ) with respect to ¯p with (a) n = 0 and (b) n = 0.1. The hardness H0 = 3 GPa, C0 = 1 × 10−8 mm4 , ql = 2π mm−1 , E = 200 GPa, ν = 0.33, ∆p0 = H0/99, ∆ζ = 1/50, ζ = 1 × 104 . When n = 0, Xu et al. (2022) and Lambert and Brodsky (2025) independently found that two elastic contact PDFs, under the normal loads ¯p and H0 − p¯, respectively, are symmetric about p = H0/2. This symmetry is c… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Variations of (a) relative contact area A∗ = A∗ el + A∗ pl, (b) A∗ el, and (c) A∗ pl with p¯ and various n. The hardness H0 = 3 GPa, C0 = 1 × 10−8 mm4 , ql = 2π mm−1 , H = 0.7, E = 200 GPa, ν = 0.33, ∆p0 = H0/99, ∆ζ = 1/50, ζ = 1 × 107 . elastic contact area transitions to the plastic contact area, while the relative contact area remains constant at 1 (see the purple line in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Variations of the relative contact area A∗ = A∗ el + A∗ pl, A∗ el, and A∗ pl with ¯p with (a-c) n = 0 and (d-f) n = 0.1. The hardness H0 = 3 GPa, C0 = 1 × 10−8 mm4 , ql = 2π mm−1 , H = 0.7, E = 200 GPa, ν = 0.33, ∆p0 = H0/99, ∆ζ = 1/50. size-independent plasticity. Those two models and the present model are all built upon the concept of “protuberance-on-protuberance” originally proposed by Archard (1957).… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Contour plot of (a, c) Mfp(H, n) and (b, d) Mle(H, n): (a, b) ¯p = 0.3H0 and (c, d) ¯p = 0.7H0. The dashed lines are isolines of 0.1% and 10%. The red line denotes the reference scaling line, n = −H + 1, inferred from Eq. (53); it is shown for comparison with the numerically calibrated elastic boundary. The hardness H0 = 3 GPa, C0 = 1×10−8 mm4 , ql = 2π mm−1 , E = 200 GPa, ν = 0.33, ∆p0 = H0/99, ∆ζ = 1/50… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Graphical illustration of full plastic, elastoplastic and linear elastic zones: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The stress concentrations caused by inherent roughness of natural and manufactured surfaces often induce plastic deformation at contact interfaces, a challenge compounded by competing influences of the size effect of plastic deformation and self-affine rough surface topography. To address this, we developed a novel methodology based on stochastic theory using compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations, for the first time, to solve elastoplastic contact problems involving scale-dependent hardness. Our approach formulates three integral equations describing the evolution of probability density functions of elastic contact pressure, relative plastic contact area, and relative non-contact area across geometrical scales. We thoroughly investigate the effects of scale-dependent hardness on contact pressure distribution, relative elastic and plastic contact areas, and the area-to-load relationship. By adjusting various mechanical and material properties, our model predicts a smooth transition from linear elasticity to elastic-plastic behavior and finally to full plasticity. A key advancement is the derivation of a new topographic yield parameter incorporating a wider range of material and geometrical properties, aiding identification of contact status. Numerical solutions enable highly precise determination of elastic and plastic limits via curve-fitting, and we also provide a new diagram for rapid identification of contact status. This study pioneers a stochastic process framework for applying the compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equation to rough surface contact analysis, and the integral equations characterizing how interfacial properties evolve with scale could offer valuable insights for other multidisciplinary fields where multiscale roughness is critical, such as earthquakes, electrical contact, and contact electrification.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims to introduce a novel stochastic framework based on compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations for modeling elastoplastic contact of self-affine rough surfaces with scale-dependent hardness. It formulates three integral equations governing the scale evolution of the probability density functions for elastic contact pressure, relative plastic contact area, and relative non-contact area. The work examines the influence of scale-dependent hardness on pressure distributions, contact area fractions, and area-load relations; derives a new topographic yield parameter; and uses numerical solutions plus curve-fitting to identify elastic/plastic limits and produce a contact-status diagram.

Significance. If the mapping from deterministic elastoplastic mechanics to the claimed Markov process across scales is rigorously justified and the integral equations recover known limits while matching independent simulations, the approach would constitute a new probabilistic tool for multiscale contact problems. The incorporation of scale-dependent hardness and the topographic yield parameter could extend to related fields involving roughness, such as tribology or geomechanics. The manuscript supplies no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or falsifiable predictions in the supplied text.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the central claim that the deterministic elastoplastic contact problem with scale-dependent hardness is faithfully captured by three integral equations derived from compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations on the PDFs is not demonstrated. No derivation, transition kernel construction, or proof that scale-to-scale increments are independent (despite continuous hardness variation and asperity interactions) is supplied; this mapping is load-bearing for the novelty assertion.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that numerical solutions enable 'highly precise determination of elastic and plastic limits via curve-fitting' lacks accompanying validation data, error analysis, or comparison against known analytic limits (constant hardness, purely elastic, or fully plastic cases). Without these, the reported contact-status predictions cannot be assessed for internal consistency.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract mentions 'adjusting various mechanical and material properties' and 'a new diagram for rapid identification of contact status' but provides no explicit parameter ranges, fitting procedure details, or figure captions in the supplied text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the central claim that the deterministic elastoplastic contact problem with scale-dependent hardness is faithfully captured by three integral equations derived from compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations on the PDFs is not demonstrated. No derivation, transition kernel construction, or proof that scale-to-scale increments are independent (despite continuous hardness variation and asperity interactions) is supplied; this mapping is load-bearing for the novelty assertion.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the mapping from the deterministic elastoplastic mechanics to the stochastic process requires explicit justification in the text. While the manuscript formulates the three integral equations, we agree that a detailed derivation of the transition kernels and discussion of the independence assumption (including treatment of asperity interactions and continuous hardness) should be added. The revised manuscript will expand the methods section with this step-by-step construction. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that numerical solutions enable 'highly precise determination of elastic and plastic limits via curve-fitting' lacks accompanying validation data, error analysis, or comparison against known analytic limits (constant hardness, purely elastic, or fully plastic cases). Without these, the reported contact-status predictions cannot be assessed for internal consistency.

    Authors: We agree that the claims on precision and the contact-status diagram require supporting validation to allow assessment of consistency. The revised version will add comparisons against known analytic limits (constant hardness, elastic, and fully plastic cases), error analysis of the numerical solutions, and quantitative assessment of the curve-fitting results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Curve-fitting of elastic/plastic limits feeds back into claimed transition predictions

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "By adjusting various mechanical and material properties, our model predicts a smooth transition from linear elasticity to elastic-plastic behavior and finally to full plasticity. [...] Numerical solutions enable highly precise determination of elastic and plastic limits via curve-fitting, and we also provide a new diagram for rapid identification of contact status."

    Elastic and plastic limits are determined by curve-fitting the numerical solutions of the three integral equations; the same model is then asserted to predict the smooth transition between precisely those fitted limits, so the reported predictions incorporate the fitted quantities by construction rather than emerging independently from the stochastic derivation.

full rationale

The paper's central methodology derives three integral equations from compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations on PDFs of pressure and areas. This derivation chain is presented as first-principles stochastic modeling. However, the abstract explicitly states that elastic and plastic limits are obtained via curve-fitting to the numerical solutions of the model itself, after which the model is claimed to predict the smooth transition across those limits. This constitutes a fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. No other circular steps (self-definitional, self-citation load-bearing, etc.) are identifiable from the supplied text, and the core stochastic construction does not reduce to its inputs by definition. The finding is therefore partial circularity rather than full equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on standard contact-mechanics assumptions plus the novel stochastic formulation; free parameters are the mechanical and material properties adjusted to produce elastic-to-plastic transitions; the topographic yield parameter is a new derived quantity without independent falsifiable evidence outside the model.

free parameters (2)
  • scale-dependent hardness function parameters
    Parameters describing how hardness varies with contact size are adjusted for different materials to obtain the reported transitions.
  • mechanical and material properties
    Various properties are tuned to predict smooth transitions from linear elasticity to full plasticity.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Compounded Chapman-Kolmogorov equations govern the evolution of the probability density functions of contact pressure and areas across geometrical scales.
    Invoked as the foundation for formulating the three integral equations.
  • domain assumption Rough surfaces exhibit self-affine topography that produces stress concentrations leading to plastic deformation.
    Standard premise stated in the abstract as the physical setting.
invented entities (1)
  • topographic yield parameter no independent evidence
    purpose: Incorporates material and geometrical properties to identify elastic, mixed, or plastic contact status.
    New parameter derived within the model; no independent evidence such as a predicted observable outside the fitted curves is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5790 in / 1608 out tokens · 35944 ms · 2026-06-27T08:23:31.116445+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references

  1. [1]

    On the dry elasto-plastic contact of nominally flat surfaces

    Almqvist, A., Sahlin, F., Larsson, R., Glavatskih, S., 2007. On the dry elasto-plastic contact of nominally flat surfaces. Tribology international 40, 574–579

    2007

  2. [2]

    Deterministic elastic-plastic modelling of rough surface contact including spectral interpolation and comparison to theoretical models

    An, B., Wang, X., Xu, Y., Jackson, R.L., 2019. Deterministic elastic-plastic modelling of rough surface contact including spectral interpolation and comparison to theoretical models. Tribology International 135, 246–258. 32

    2019

  3. [3]

    Elastic deformation and the laws of friction

    Archard, J., 1957. Elastic deformation and the laws of friction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 243, 190–205

    1957

  4. [4]

    Scale effects in friction using strain gradient plasticity and dislocation-assisted sliding (microslip)

    Bhushan, B., Nosonovsky, M., 2003. Scale effects in friction using strain gradient plasticity and dislocation-assisted sliding (microslip). Acta materialia 51, 4331–4345

    2003

  5. [5]

    Constraints from fault roughness on the scale-dependent strength of rocks

    Brodsky, E.E., Kirkpatrick, J.D., Candela, T., 2016. Constraints from fault roughness on the scale-dependent strength of rocks. Geology 44, 19–22

    2016

  6. [6]

    The persistence of roughness between surfaces in static contact

    Childs, T., 1977. The persistence of roughness between surfaces in static contact. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 353, 35–53

    1977

  7. [7]

    A new plasticity index including size-effects in the contact of rough surfaces

    Ciavarella, M., 2024. A new plasticity index including size-effects in the contact of rough surfaces. Lubricants 12, 83

    2024

  8. [8]

    Linear elastic contact of the weierstrass profile

    Ciavarella, M., Demelio, G., Barber, J., Jang, Y.H., 2000. Linear elastic contact of the weierstrass profile. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 456, 387–405

    2000

  9. [9]

    An incremental contact model for rough surfaces of strain-hardening solids

    Ding, Y., Liang, X., Wang, G., 2022. An incremental contact model for rough surfaces of strain-hardening solids. International Journal of Applied Mechanics 14, 2250088

    2022

  10. [10]

    Fluid leakage in metallic seals

    Fischer, F., Schmitz, K., Tiwari, A., Persson, B.N., 2020. Fluid leakage in metallic seals. Tribology Letters 68, 125. Fr´ erot, L., Bonnet, M., Molinari, J.F., Anciaux, G., 2019. A fourier-accelerated volume integral method for elastoplastic contact. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 351, 951–976

    2020

  11. [11]

    Elastic–plastic contact of a rough surface with weierstrass profile

    Gao, Y.F., Bower, A., 2006. Elastic–plastic contact of a rough surface with weierstrass profile. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 462, 319–348

    2006

  12. [12]

    A review of elastic–plastic contact mechanics

    Ghaednia, H., Wang, X., Saha, S., Xu, Y., Sharma, A., Jackson, R.L., 2017. A review of elastic–plastic contact mechanics. Applied mechanics reviews 69, 060804

    2017

  13. [13]

    Contact of nominally flat surfaces

    Greenwood, J.A., Williamson, J.P., 1966. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proceedings of the royal society of London. Series A. Mathematical and physical sciences 295, 300–319

    1966

  14. [14]

    Asperity pressures in elastic–plastic rough surface contacts

    Inose, K., Kadiric, A., 2025. Asperity pressures in elastic–plastic rough surface contacts. Journal of Tribology 147, 111503

    2025

  15. [15]

    Which asperity scales matter for true contact area? a multi- scale and statistical investigation

    Jackson, R., Jacobs, T., 2023. Which asperity scales matter for true contact area? a multi- scale and statistical investigation. Mechanics of Materials 184, 104746

    2023

  16. [16]

    The effect of scale-dependent hardness on elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces

    Jackson, R.L., 2006. The effect of scale-dependent hardness on elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces. Tribology Transactions 49, 135–150. 33

    2006

  17. [17]

    A finite element study of elasto-plastic hemispherical contact against a rigid flat

    Jackson, R.L., Green, I., 2005. A finite element study of elasto-plastic hemispherical contact against a rigid flat. J. Trib. 127, 343–354

    2005

  18. [18]

    A statistical model of elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces

    Jackson, R.L., Green, I., 2006. A statistical model of elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces. Tribology international 39, 906–914

    2006

  19. [19]

    A multi-scale model for contact between rough surfaces

    Jackson, R.L., Streator, J.L., 2006. A multi-scale model for contact between rough surfaces. Wear 261, 1337–1347

    2006

  20. [20]

    Quantitative characterization of surface topog- raphy using spectral analysis

    Jacobs, T.D., Junge, T., Pastewka, L., 2017. Quantitative characterization of surface topog- raphy using spectral analysis. Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties 5, 013001

    2017

  21. [21]

    Development of a three-dimensional semi-analytical elastic-plastic contact code

    Jacq, C., Ne´ lias, D., Lormand, G., Girodin, D., 2002. Development of a three-dimensional semi-analytical elastic-plastic contact code. J. Trib. 124, 653–667

    2002

  22. [22]

    Competition between roughness and strength for scale- dependent surfaces

    Lambert, V., Brodsky, E.E., 2025. Competition between roughness and strength for scale- dependent surfaces. Physical Review E 111, 065502

    2025

  23. [23]

    An improved elastic–plastic contact model with asperity interactions based on greenwood–williamson theory

    Li, C.Y., Ding, Y., Liang, X.M., Wang, G.F., 2023. An improved elastic–plastic contact model with asperity interactions based on greenwood–williamson theory. Acta Mechanica 234, 5187–5201

    2023

  24. [24]

    Elastic-perfectly plastic contact of rough surfaces: An incremental equivalent circular model

    Liang, X.M., Ding, Y., Duo, Y., Yuan, W., Wang, G., 2022. Elastic-perfectly plastic contact of rough surfaces: An incremental equivalent circular model. Journal of Tribology 144, 051501

    2022

  25. [25]

    Role of Fractal Geometry in Roughness Characterization and Contact Mechanics of Surfaces

    Majumdar, A., Bhushan, B., 1990. Role of Fractal Geometry in Roughness Characterization and Contact Mechanics of Surfaces. Journal of Tribology 112, 205–216

    1990

  26. [26]

    Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity

    Nix, W.D., Gao, H., 1998. Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 46, 411–425

    1998

  27. [27]

    Finite element modeling of elasto- plastic contact between rough surfaces

    Pei, L., Hyun, S., Molinari, J.F., Robbins, M.O., 2005. Finite element modeling of elasto- plastic contact between rough surfaces. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 53, 2385–2409. P´ erez-R` afols, F., Larsson, R., Almqvist, A., 2016. Modelling of leakage on metal-to-metal seals. Tribology International 94, 421–427

    2005

  28. [28]

    Elastoplastic contact between randomly rough surfaces

    Persson, B., 2001. Elastoplastic contact between randomly rough surfaces. Physical Review Letters 87, 116101. 34

    2001

  29. [29]

    Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces

    Persson, B.N., 2006. Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces. Surface science reports 61, 201–227

    2006

  30. [30]

    The surface-topography challenge: A multi- laboratory benchmark study to advance the characterization of topography

    Algieri, L., Ali, N., Almqvist, A., et al., 2025. The surface-topography challenge: A multi- laboratory benchmark study to advance the characterization of topography. Tribology letters 73, 110

    2025

  31. [31]

    On the contact area and mean gap of rough, elastic contacts: dimensional analysis, numerical corrections, and reference data

    Prodanov, N., Dapp, W.B., M¨ user, M.H., 2014. On the contact area and mean gap of rough, elastic contacts: dimensional analysis, numerical corrections, and reference data. Tribology Letters 53, 433–448

    2014

  32. [32]

    A mixed lubrication model incorporating measured surface topography

    Sahlin, F., Larsson, R., Almqvist, A., Lugt, P.M., Marklund, P., 2010. A mixed lubrication model incorporating measured surface topography. part 1: theory of flow factors. Proceed- ings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology 224, 335–351

    2010

  33. [33]

    Spontaneous ordering of identical materials into a triboelectric series

    Sobarzo, J.C., Pertl, F., Balazs, D.M., Costanzo, T., Sauer, M., Foelske, A., Ostermann, M., Pichler, C.M., Wang, Y., Nagata, Y., et al., 2025. Spontaneous ordering of identical materials into a triboelectric series. Nature 638, 664–669

    2025

  34. [34]

    Strain gradient plasticity analysis of elasto- plastic contact between rough surfaces

    Song, H., Van der Giessen, E., Liu, X., 2016. Strain gradient plasticity analysis of elasto- plastic contact between rough surfaces. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 96, 18–28

    2016

  35. [35]

    Statistical model of rough surface contact accounting for size-dependent plasticity and asperity interaction

    Song, H., Vakis, A., Liu, X., Van der Giessen, E., 2017. Statistical model of rough surface contact accounting for size-dependent plasticity and asperity interaction. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 106, 1–14

    2017

  36. [36]

    The correlation of the indentation size effect measured with indenters of various shapes

    Swadener, J., George, E., Pharr, G., 2002. The correlation of the indentation size effect measured with indenters of various shapes. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 50, 681–694

    2002

  37. [37]

    Plastic contact of self-affine surfaces: Persson’s theory versus discrete dislocation plasticity

    Venugopalan, S., Irani, N., Nicola, L., 2019. Plastic contact of self-affine surfaces: Persson’s theory versus discrete dislocation plasticity. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 132, 103676

    2019

  38. [38]

    Green’s function molecular dynamics meets discrete dislocation plasticity

    Venugopalan, S.P., M¨ user, M.H., Nicola, L., 2017. Green’s function molecular dynamics meets discrete dislocation plasticity. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 25, 065018

    2017

  39. [39]

    The effect of resolution on the deterministic finite element elastic-plastic rough surface contact under combined normal and tangential loading

    Wang, X., An, B., Xu, Y., Jackson, R.L., 2020. The effect of resolution on the deterministic finite element elastic-plastic rough surface contact under combined normal and tangential loading. Tribology International 144, 106141

    2020

  40. [40]

    Theoretical and finite element analysis of static friction between multi-scale rough surfaces

    Wang, X., Xu, Y., Jackson, R.L., 2018. Theoretical and finite element analysis of static friction between multi-scale rough surfaces. Tribology Letters 66, 146. 35

    2018

  41. [41]

    Persson’s theory of purely normal elastic rough surface contact: A tutorial based on stochastic process theory

    Xu, Y., Li, X., Chen, Q., Zhou, Y., 2024. Persson’s theory of purely normal elastic rough surface contact: A tutorial based on stochastic process theory. International Journal of Solids and Structures , 112684

    2024

  42. [42]

    Revisiting the persson theory of elastoplastic contact: A simpler closed-form solution and a rigorous proof of boundary conditions

    Xu, Y., Li, X., Mulvihill, D.M., 2022. Revisiting the persson theory of elastoplastic contact: A simpler closed-form solution and a rigorous proof of boundary conditions. Tribology Letters 70, 1–7

    2022

  43. [43]

    Experimental and finite element analyses of contact behaviors between non-transparent rough surfaces

    Zhang, F., Liu, J., Ding, X., Wang, R., 2019. Experimental and finite element analyses of contact behaviors between non-transparent rough surfaces. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 126, 87–100

    2019

  44. [44]

    On contact spots details of rough surface contact using morphologic image processing

    Zhang, H., Liu, S., Wang, W., 2024. On contact spots details of rough surface contact using morphologic image processing. Mechanism and Machine Theory 192, 105546. Appendix A. Boundary condition In this appendix we derive an approximate boundary condition forP 0(p=H 2, ζ|p′, ζ′) within the small-step formulation introduced in Eq. (32), namelydV /dζ≈∆V /∆ζ...

    2024