All-electric picosecond field-free spin-orbit torque switching in magnetic trilayers

Hyunsoo Yang; Qu Yang; Shishun Zhao; Xinhou Chen; Yuchen Pu

arxiv: 2606.12122 · v1 · pith:S7PREHFHnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

All-electric picosecond field-free spin-orbit torque switching in magnetic trilayers

Xinhou Chen , Shishun Zhao , Yuchen Pu , Qu Yang , Hyunsoo Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords spin-orbit torqueSOT switchingpicosecond pulsesfield-free switchingnanoplasma generatorMRAMmagnetic trilayersJoule heating

0 comments

The pith

An on-chip nanoplasma generator produces 6.4 ps pulses to achieve field-free SOT switching in magnetic trilayers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that an all-electrical on-chip nanoplasma pulse generator can create electrical pulses as short as 6.4 picoseconds. These short pulses enable field-free spin-orbit torque switching of magnetization in magnetic trilayers without needing external magnetic fields or laser systems. Reducing pulse duration cuts the required writing energy by two to three orders of magnitude, thanks to ultrafast Joule heating. This approach supports development of faster and more energy-efficient magnetic memory devices integrable on chips.

Core claim

We introduce an all-electrical on-chip nanoplasma pulse generator capable of producing pulses as short as 6.4 ps, enabling ultrafast picosecond field-free SOT switching in magnetic trilayers. We show that reducing the pulse width lowers the writing energy by 2-3 orders of magnitude, with ultrafast Joule heating assistance playing an essential role in the enhanced efficiency of the picosecond regime.

What carries the argument

The on-chip nanoplasma pulse generator, which creates electrical pulses down to 6.4 ps to drive spin-orbit torque switching without external fields.

If this is right

Field-free SOT switching occurs using only on-chip electrical pulses in the picosecond regime.
Writing energy drops by two to three orders of magnitude as pulse width decreases.
Ultrafast Joule heating assists switching efficiency specifically in the picosecond regime.
The generator provides an on-chip platform for studying ultrafast spintronic phenomena.
The results support development of high-speed, energy-efficient, and scalable SOT-MRAM.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The generator design could be adapted to probe SOT dynamics in additional material systems at even shorter timescales.
On-chip integration may simplify combining SOT devices with standard semiconductor fabrication flows.
Similar pulse-generation methods might apply to other ultrafast magnetic or spintronic switching mechanisms.

Load-bearing premise

The observed magnetization reversal is driven solely by the spin-orbit torque from the 6.4 ps pulse without hidden field assistance or measurement artifacts.

What would settle it

An independent high-speed oscilloscope measurement showing the actual pulse width exceeds 10 ps while switching still occurs at the reported energies would falsify the necessity of the 6.4 ps duration.

read the original abstract

Spin-orbit torque (SOT) enables the electrical manipulation of the magnetization with high speed and low energy consumption for magnetic random-access memory (MRAM) applications. Previous studies of short-pulse SOT switching have mainly focused on the nanosecond regime, whereas reports employing picosecond pulses remain scarce and have largely relied on field-assisted switching using bulky, high-power laser systems, limiting prospects for chip-level integration. Here, we introduce an all-electrical on-chip nanoplasma pulse generator capable of producing pulses as short as 6.4 ps, enabling ultrafast picosecond field-free SOT switching in magnetic trilayers. We show that reducing the pulse width lowers the writing energy by 2-3 orders of magnitude, with ultrafast Joule heating assistance playing an essential role in the enhanced efficiency of the picosecond regime. Our demonstration of ultrafast, all-electrical, and field-free SOT switching establishes the nanoplasma pulse generator as an on-chip platform for ultrafast spintronic studies, with promise for high-speed, energy-efficient, and scalable SOT-MRAM technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reports an on-chip nanoplasma generator making 6.4 ps pulses for all-electrical field-free SOT switching in trilayers, with claimed 2-3 order energy drop, but the no-stray-field isolation is the part that needs data checks.

read the letter

The headline result is an on-chip electrical source for sub-10 ps pulses that switches a magnetic trilayer without external field. That setup looks new next to the laser-based or nanosecond work cited.

They show the generator produces 6.4 ps pulses and that shorter width cuts writing energy sharply, with Joule heating as part of the mechanism. The device itself is presented as a platform for on-chip ultrafast studies, which is a concrete engineering step.

The load-bearing claim is that the reversal is purely SOT from the pulse with zero stray or Oersted field contribution and no readout artifacts. The stress-test note flags exactly this: any unaccounted inductive pickup or calibration offset in pulse metrology would change the interpretation. Without the figures on pulse characterization, Hall traces under varied conditions, and field calibration, it is hard to judge how cleanly they separated those effects.

This is for spintronics groups working on fast MRAM or on-chip pulse sources. A reader who needs practical routes to picosecond switching would get value if the experimental controls hold up.

It should go to peer review so referees can examine the pulse metrology and zero-field data directly.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an all-electrical on-chip nanoplasma pulse generator capable of producing 6.4 ps pulses that enable ultrafast, field-free spin-orbit torque (SOT) switching in magnetic trilayers. It reports a 2-3 order-of-magnitude reduction in writing energy relative to longer pulses, attributing the improvement to ultrafast Joule heating assistance, and positions the generator as an integrated platform for picosecond spintronic studies with implications for SOT-MRAM.

Significance. If the experimental isolation of pulse parameters and zero-field conditions holds, the result would be significant for the field: it supplies the first all-electrical, on-chip route to picosecond SOT switching, removing reliance on laser systems and external fields while demonstrating substantial energy gains. This directly addresses integration barriers for high-speed MRAM and provides a new experimental platform for studying ultrafast spin dynamics.

major comments (2)

[Methods/Results (pulse characterization)] The central claim of purely field-free 6.4 ps SOT switching requires explicit documentation (likely in the Experimental Methods or Results sections) of how the pulse width was metrologically verified (e.g., sampling-oscilloscope bandwidth, de-embedding of parasitics) and how residual Oersted or inductive fields from the current path were quantified and shown to be below the switching threshold.
[Discussion (energy reduction)] The attribution of the 2-3 order energy reduction to ultrafast Joule heating assistance is load-bearing for the efficiency claim; the manuscript should supply either time-resolved temperature data or a quantitative thermal model (e.g., in the Discussion) that isolates the heating contribution from the SOT torque itself.

minor comments (2)

Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the number of switching trials, error bars on switching probability, and the precise definition of writing energy (current amplitude imes pulse width imes device resistance).
The abstract states 'as short as 6.4 ps'; the main text should report the distribution or minimum achieved width with measurement uncertainty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive comments, which help strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Methods/Results (pulse characterization)] The central claim of purely field-free 6.4 ps SOT switching requires explicit documentation (likely in the Experimental Methods or Results sections) of how the pulse width was metrologically verified (e.g., sampling-oscilloscope bandwidth, de-embedding of parasitics) and how residual Oersted or inductive fields from the current path were quantified and shown to be below the switching threshold.

Authors: We agree that rigorous documentation of pulse metrology is essential to substantiate the field-free claim. The manuscript describes the on-chip nanoplasma generator and reports the 6.4 ps pulse width, but we acknowledge that the specific verification details (oscilloscope bandwidth, parasitic de-embedding, and residual-field quantification) were not expanded in the Experimental Methods. In the revised manuscript we will add these elements, including the instrument bandwidth, de-embedding procedure, and estimates showing residual Oersted/inductive fields remain below the switching threshold. This addition will be placed in the Methods section without changing any experimental results. revision: yes
Referee: [Discussion (energy reduction)] The attribution of the 2-3 order energy reduction to ultrafast Joule heating assistance is load-bearing for the efficiency claim; the manuscript should supply either time-resolved temperature data or a quantitative thermal model (e.g., in the Discussion) that isolates the heating contribution from the SOT torque itself.

Authors: The referee correctly notes that the energy-reduction claim depends on the heating-assistance mechanism. The manuscript links the 2–3 order improvement to ultrafast Joule heating via pulse-width scaling and energy calculations, yet does not provide an explicit quantitative model. In the revised Discussion we will include a thermal model based on the heat-diffusion equation for the trilayer stack, estimating the transient temperature rise during the 6.4 ps pulse and its reduction of the anisotropy barrier. This will isolate the heating contribution from the SOT torque and directly support the efficiency attribution. Time-resolved temperature data are not currently available, but the model will be presented with all assumptions stated. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental demonstration with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript describes fabrication and measurement of an on-chip nanoplasma pulse generator producing 6.4 ps electrical pulses that induce field-free SOT switching in magnetic trilayers. All load-bearing claims rest on direct experimental characterization (pulse metrology, Hall voltage readout, zero external field conditions) rather than any mathematical derivation chain, parameter fitting renamed as prediction, or self-citation of uniqueness theorems. No equations are presented that reduce to their own inputs by construction, and the abstract and described results contain no ansatz smuggling or renaming of known patterns. This is the expected outcome for an experimental methods paper; the reader's circularity score of 2.0 is consistent with the absence of any reducible steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental demonstration paper; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are extractable from the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5731 in / 881 out tokens · 14971 ms · 2026-06-27T08:46:30.655748+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references

[1]

Liu, L. et al. Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science 336, 555 (2012)

2012
[2]

J., Gudmundsen, T

Liu, L., Lee, O. J., Gudmundsen, T. J., Ralph, D. C. & Buhrman, R. A. Current-induced switching of perpendicularly magnetized magnetic layers using spin torque from the spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 096602 (2012)

2012
[3]

Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature 476, 189-193 (2011)

2011
[4]

Brataas, A., Kent, A. D. & Ohno, H. Current-induced torques in magnetic materials. Nat. Mater. 11, 372-381 (2012)

2012
[5]

M., Cai, K

Ramaswamy, R., Lee, J. M., Cai, K. & Yang, H. Recent advances in spin-orbit torques: Moving towards device applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 031107 (2018)

2018
[6]

Shao, Q. et al. Roadmap of spin-orbit torques. IEEE Trans. Magn. 57, 800439 (2021)

2021
[7]

Yang, H. et al. Two-dimensional materials prospects for non- volatile spintronic memories. Nature 606, 663-673 (2022)

2022
[8]

& Lee, K

Lee, K.- S., Lee, S.- W., Min, B.- C. & Lee, K. -J. Thermally activated switching of perpendicular magnet by spin-orbit spin torque. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 072413 (2014)

2014
[9]

Garello, K. et al. Ultrafast magnetization switching by spin -orbit torques. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 212402 (2014)

2014
[10]

Baumgartner, M. et al. Spatially and time-resolved magnetization dynamics driven by spin-orbit torques. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 980-986 (2017)

2017
[11]

Cai, K. et al. Ultrafast and energy-efficient spin-orbit torque switching in compensated ferrimagnets. Nat. Electron. 3, 37-42 (2020)

2020
[12]

Yang, Q. et al. Field-free spin-orbit torque switching in ferromagnetic trilayers at sub- ns timescales. Nat. Commun. 15, 1814 (2024)

2024
[13]

Lee, J. M. et al. Oscillatory spin-orbit torque switching induced by field- like torques. Commun. Phys. 1, 2 (2018)

2018
[14]

Gerrits, H

Th. Gerrits, H. A. M. v. d. B., J. Hohlfeld, L. Bär, Th. Rasing. Ultrafast precessional magnetization reversal by picosecond magnetic field pulse shaping. Nature 418, 509 (2002)

2002
[15]

Jhuria, K. et al. Spin-orbit torque switching of a ferromagnet with picosecond electrical pulses. Nat. Electron. 3, 680-686 (2020)

2020
[16]

Wu, H. et al. Spin-orbit-torque switching of ferrimagnets by terahertz electrical pulses. Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 064012 (2022)

2022
[17]

Debanjan, P. et al. Picosecond spin- orbit torque -induced coherent magnetization switching in a ferromagnet. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh5562 (2023)

2023
[18]

Johnson, E. O. Physical limitations on frequency and power parameters of transistors. In IEEE International Convention Record, 13, 27-34 (IEEE, 1965)

1965
[19]

Samizadeh Nikoo, M. et al. Nanoplasma-enabled picosecond switches for ultrafast electronics. Nature 579, 534-539 (2020)

2020
[20]

Ryu, J. et al. Efficient spin -orbit torque in magnetic trilayers using all three polarizations of a spin current. Nat. Electron. 5, 217-223 (2022)

2022
[21]

Yu, G. et al. Switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin- orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 548-554 (2014)

2014
[22]

You, L. et al. Switching of perpendicularly polarized nanomagnets with spin orbit 13 torque without an external magnetic field by engineering a tilted anisotropy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 10310-10315 (2015)

2015
[23]

& Ohno, H

Fukami, S., Zhang, C., DuttaGupta, S., Kurenkov, A. & Ohno, H. Magnetization switching by spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet -ferromagnet bilayer system. Nat. Mater. 15, 535-541 (2016)

2016
[24]

Oh, Y . W. et al. Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization through spin-orbit torque in antiferromagnet/ferromagnet/oxide structures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 878-884 (2016)

2016
[25]

C., Betto, D., Rode, K., Coey, J

Lau, Y . C., Betto, D., Rode, K., Coey, J. M. & Stamenov, P. Spin-orbit torque switching without an external field using interlayer exchange coupling. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 758- 762 (2016)

2016
[26]

van den Brink, A. et al. Field-free magnetization reversal by spin- Hall effect and exchange bias. Nat. Commun. 7, 10854 (2016)

2016
[27]

MacNeill, D. et al. Control of spin- orbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe2/ferromagnet bilayers. Nat. Phys. 13, 300-305 (2016)

2016
[28]

Cai, K. et al. Electric field control of deterministic current- induced magnetization switching in a hybrid ferromagnetic/ferroelectric structure. Nat. Mater. 16, 712- 716 (2017)

2017
[29]

Liu, L. et al. Symmetry-dependent field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 277-282 (2021)

2021
[30]

Hu, S. et al. Efficient perpendicular magnetization switching by a magnetic spin Hall effect in a noncollinear antiferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 13, 4447 (2022)

2022
[31]

Liu, Y . et al. Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization at room temperature using out-of-plane spins from TaIrTe4. Nat. Electron. 6, 732-738 (2023)

2023
[32]

Wang, F. et al. Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization by two-dimensional PtTe2/WTe2 van der Waals heterostructures with high spin Hall conductivity. Nat. Mater. 23, 768 (2024)

2024
[33]

Mishra, J

Umesh K. Mishra, J. S. Semiconductor Device Physics and Design. (Springer Dordrecht, 2008)

2008
[34]

Loveless, A. M. & Garner, A. L. Scaling laws for gas breakdown for nanoscale to microscale gaps at atmospheric pressure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 234103 (2016)

2016
[35]

& Stiles, M

Taniguchi, T., Grollier, J. & Stiles, M. D. Spin- transfer torques generated by the anomalous Hall effect and anisotropic magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 044001 (2015)

2015
[36]

Iihama, S. et al. Spin-transfer torque induced by the spin anomalous Hall effect. Nat. Electron. 1, 120-123 (2018)

2018
[37]

P., Zemen, J

Amin, V . P., Zemen, J. & Stiles, M. D. Interface -generated spin currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136805 (2018)

2018
[38]

Baek, S. C. et al. Spin currents and spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic trilayers. Nat. Mater. 17, 509-513 (2018)

2018
[39]

Lee, D. K. & Lee, K. J. Spin-orbit torque switching of perpendicular magnetization in ferromagnetic trilayers. Sci. Rep. 10, 1772 (2020)

2020
[40]

& Yang, H

Liu, Y ., Hu, F., Shi, G. & Yang, H. Visualization of out -of-plane spin generation in mirror symmetry broken Co. Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 042402 (2023)

2023
[41]

Bedau, D. et al. Spin-transfer pulse switching: From the dynamic to the thermally activated regime. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 262502 (2010). 14

2010
[42]

Liu, H. et al. Dynamics of spin torque switching in all -perpendicular spin valve nanopillars. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 358-359, 233-258 (2014)

2014
[43]

Sala, G. et al. Asynchronous current-induced switching of rare -earth and transition- metal sublattices in ferrimagnetic alloys. Nat. Mater. 21, 640-646 (2022)

2022
[44]

Manchon, A. et al. Current-induced spin- orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019)

2019
[45]

Diaz, E. et al. Energy-efficient picosecond spin-orbit torque magnetization switching in ferro- and ferrimagnetic films. Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 36 (2025)

2025
[46]

Kimel, A. V . & Li, M. Writing magnetic memory with ultrashort light pulses. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 189-200 (2019)

2019
[47]

S. H. Charap, P.- L. L., and Yanjun He. Thermal stability of recorded information at high densities. IEEE Trans. Magn. 33, 978 (1997)

1997
[48]

A., Moser

Dieter, W. A., Moser. Thermal effect limits in ultrahigh- density magnetic recording. IEEE Trans. Magn. 35, 4423 (1999)

1999
[49]

Prejbeanu, I. L. et al. Thermally assisted MRAM. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 165218 (2007)

2007
[50]

Kryder, M. H. et al. Heat assisted magnetic recording. Proc. IEEE 96, 1810- 1835 (2008)

2008
[51]

HAMR: heat -assisted magnetic recording https://www.seagate.com/sg/en/innovation/hamr/ (2024)

Seagate Technology. HAMR: heat -assisted magnetic recording https://www.seagate.com/sg/en/innovation/hamr/ (2024). Methods Fabrication of nanoplasma pulse generator . The nanoplasma pulse generator was fabricated on (0001)-sapphire substrates. Initially, a 4-inch sapphire wafer w as cleaned, followed by the deposition of a 300 nm thick gold layer on top o...

2024

[1] [1]

Liu, L. et al. Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science 336, 555 (2012)

2012

[2] [2]

J., Gudmundsen, T

Liu, L., Lee, O. J., Gudmundsen, T. J., Ralph, D. C. & Buhrman, R. A. Current-induced switching of perpendicularly magnetized magnetic layers using spin torque from the spin Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 096602 (2012)

2012

[3] [3]

Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature 476, 189-193 (2011)

2011

[4] [4]

Brataas, A., Kent, A. D. & Ohno, H. Current-induced torques in magnetic materials. Nat. Mater. 11, 372-381 (2012)

2012

[5] [5]

M., Cai, K

Ramaswamy, R., Lee, J. M., Cai, K. & Yang, H. Recent advances in spin-orbit torques: Moving towards device applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 031107 (2018)

2018

[6] [6]

Shao, Q. et al. Roadmap of spin-orbit torques. IEEE Trans. Magn. 57, 800439 (2021)

2021

[7] [7]

Yang, H. et al. Two-dimensional materials prospects for non- volatile spintronic memories. Nature 606, 663-673 (2022)

2022

[8] [8]

& Lee, K

Lee, K.- S., Lee, S.- W., Min, B.- C. & Lee, K. -J. Thermally activated switching of perpendicular magnet by spin-orbit spin torque. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 072413 (2014)

2014

[9] [9]

Garello, K. et al. Ultrafast magnetization switching by spin -orbit torques. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 212402 (2014)

2014

[10] [10]

Baumgartner, M. et al. Spatially and time-resolved magnetization dynamics driven by spin-orbit torques. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 980-986 (2017)

2017

[11] [11]

Cai, K. et al. Ultrafast and energy-efficient spin-orbit torque switching in compensated ferrimagnets. Nat. Electron. 3, 37-42 (2020)

2020

[12] [12]

Yang, Q. et al. Field-free spin-orbit torque switching in ferromagnetic trilayers at sub- ns timescales. Nat. Commun. 15, 1814 (2024)

2024

[13] [13]

Lee, J. M. et al. Oscillatory spin-orbit torque switching induced by field- like torques. Commun. Phys. 1, 2 (2018)

2018

[14] [14]

Gerrits, H

Th. Gerrits, H. A. M. v. d. B., J. Hohlfeld, L. Bär, Th. Rasing. Ultrafast precessional magnetization reversal by picosecond magnetic field pulse shaping. Nature 418, 509 (2002)

2002

[15] [15]

Jhuria, K. et al. Spin-orbit torque switching of a ferromagnet with picosecond electrical pulses. Nat. Electron. 3, 680-686 (2020)

2020

[16] [16]

Wu, H. et al. Spin-orbit-torque switching of ferrimagnets by terahertz electrical pulses. Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 064012 (2022)

2022

[17] [17]

Debanjan, P. et al. Picosecond spin- orbit torque -induced coherent magnetization switching in a ferromagnet. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh5562 (2023)

2023

[18] [18]

Johnson, E. O. Physical limitations on frequency and power parameters of transistors. In IEEE International Convention Record, 13, 27-34 (IEEE, 1965)

1965

[19] [19]

Samizadeh Nikoo, M. et al. Nanoplasma-enabled picosecond switches for ultrafast electronics. Nature 579, 534-539 (2020)

2020

[20] [20]

Ryu, J. et al. Efficient spin -orbit torque in magnetic trilayers using all three polarizations of a spin current. Nat. Electron. 5, 217-223 (2022)

2022

[21] [21]

Yu, G. et al. Switching of perpendicular magnetization by spin- orbit torques in the absence of external magnetic fields. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 548-554 (2014)

2014

[22] [22]

You, L. et al. Switching of perpendicularly polarized nanomagnets with spin orbit 13 torque without an external magnetic field by engineering a tilted anisotropy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 10310-10315 (2015)

2015

[23] [23]

& Ohno, H

Fukami, S., Zhang, C., DuttaGupta, S., Kurenkov, A. & Ohno, H. Magnetization switching by spin-orbit torque in an antiferromagnet -ferromagnet bilayer system. Nat. Mater. 15, 535-541 (2016)

2016

[24] [24]

Oh, Y . W. et al. Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization through spin-orbit torque in antiferromagnet/ferromagnet/oxide structures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 878-884 (2016)

2016

[25] [25]

C., Betto, D., Rode, K., Coey, J

Lau, Y . C., Betto, D., Rode, K., Coey, J. M. & Stamenov, P. Spin-orbit torque switching without an external field using interlayer exchange coupling. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 758- 762 (2016)

2016

[26] [26]

van den Brink, A. et al. Field-free magnetization reversal by spin- Hall effect and exchange bias. Nat. Commun. 7, 10854 (2016)

2016

[27] [27]

MacNeill, D. et al. Control of spin- orbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe2/ferromagnet bilayers. Nat. Phys. 13, 300-305 (2016)

2016

[28] [28]

Cai, K. et al. Electric field control of deterministic current- induced magnetization switching in a hybrid ferromagnetic/ferroelectric structure. Nat. Mater. 16, 712- 716 (2017)

2017

[29] [29]

Liu, L. et al. Symmetry-dependent field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 277-282 (2021)

2021

[30] [30]

Hu, S. et al. Efficient perpendicular magnetization switching by a magnetic spin Hall effect in a noncollinear antiferromagnet. Nat. Commun. 13, 4447 (2022)

2022

[31] [31]

Liu, Y . et al. Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization at room temperature using out-of-plane spins from TaIrTe4. Nat. Electron. 6, 732-738 (2023)

2023

[32] [32]

Wang, F. et al. Field-free switching of perpendicular magnetization by two-dimensional PtTe2/WTe2 van der Waals heterostructures with high spin Hall conductivity. Nat. Mater. 23, 768 (2024)

2024

[33] [33]

Mishra, J

Umesh K. Mishra, J. S. Semiconductor Device Physics and Design. (Springer Dordrecht, 2008)

2008

[34] [34]

Loveless, A. M. & Garner, A. L. Scaling laws for gas breakdown for nanoscale to microscale gaps at atmospheric pressure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 234103 (2016)

2016

[35] [35]

& Stiles, M

Taniguchi, T., Grollier, J. & Stiles, M. D. Spin- transfer torques generated by the anomalous Hall effect and anisotropic magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 044001 (2015)

2015

[36] [36]

Iihama, S. et al. Spin-transfer torque induced by the spin anomalous Hall effect. Nat. Electron. 1, 120-123 (2018)

2018

[37] [37]

P., Zemen, J

Amin, V . P., Zemen, J. & Stiles, M. D. Interface -generated spin currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136805 (2018)

2018

[38] [38]

Baek, S. C. et al. Spin currents and spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic trilayers. Nat. Mater. 17, 509-513 (2018)

2018

[39] [39]

Lee, D. K. & Lee, K. J. Spin-orbit torque switching of perpendicular magnetization in ferromagnetic trilayers. Sci. Rep. 10, 1772 (2020)

2020

[40] [40]

& Yang, H

Liu, Y ., Hu, F., Shi, G. & Yang, H. Visualization of out -of-plane spin generation in mirror symmetry broken Co. Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 042402 (2023)

2023

[41] [41]

Bedau, D. et al. Spin-transfer pulse switching: From the dynamic to the thermally activated regime. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 262502 (2010). 14

2010

[42] [42]

Liu, H. et al. Dynamics of spin torque switching in all -perpendicular spin valve nanopillars. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 358-359, 233-258 (2014)

2014

[43] [43]

Sala, G. et al. Asynchronous current-induced switching of rare -earth and transition- metal sublattices in ferrimagnetic alloys. Nat. Mater. 21, 640-646 (2022)

2022

[44] [44]

Manchon, A. et al. Current-induced spin- orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035004 (2019)

2019

[45] [45]

Diaz, E. et al. Energy-efficient picosecond spin-orbit torque magnetization switching in ferro- and ferrimagnetic films. Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 36 (2025)

2025

[46] [46]

Kimel, A. V . & Li, M. Writing magnetic memory with ultrashort light pulses. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 189-200 (2019)

2019

[47] [47]

S. H. Charap, P.- L. L., and Yanjun He. Thermal stability of recorded information at high densities. IEEE Trans. Magn. 33, 978 (1997)

1997

[48] [48]

A., Moser

Dieter, W. A., Moser. Thermal effect limits in ultrahigh- density magnetic recording. IEEE Trans. Magn. 35, 4423 (1999)

1999

[49] [49]

Prejbeanu, I. L. et al. Thermally assisted MRAM. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 165218 (2007)

2007

[50] [50]

Kryder, M. H. et al. Heat assisted magnetic recording. Proc. IEEE 96, 1810- 1835 (2008)

2008

[51] [51]

HAMR: heat -assisted magnetic recording https://www.seagate.com/sg/en/innovation/hamr/ (2024)

Seagate Technology. HAMR: heat -assisted magnetic recording https://www.seagate.com/sg/en/innovation/hamr/ (2024). Methods Fabrication of nanoplasma pulse generator . The nanoplasma pulse generator was fabricated on (0001)-sapphire substrates. Initially, a 4-inch sapphire wafer w as cleaned, followed by the deposition of a 300 nm thick gold layer on top o...

2024