pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.15554 · v2 · pith:62HHJS2Znew · submitted 2026-06-14 · 💻 cs.CV

RaLMPH: Reliability-aware Learning for Multi-Pathologist Harmonization in Whole-Slide Image Classification

Sungrae Hong , Jiwon Jeong , Soeun Cheon , Donghee Han , Sol Lee , Jisu Shin , Kyungeun Kim , Mun Yong Yi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 04:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords multi-pathologist harmonizationwhole-slide image classificationmultiple instance learninglabel reconciliationreliability-aware learningcomputational pathologyinter-annotator variabilityMIL label fusion
0
0 comments X

The pith

RaLMPH reconciles differing pathologist labels on whole-slide images by building a reliability field from local feature neighborhoods and expert entropy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Standard multiple instance learning for whole-slide images assumes a single gold label per slide, yet clinical practice shows frequent disagreement among pathologists. RaLMPH builds a reliability field that combines local neighborhood structure in the learned feature space with each expert's uncertainty measured by entropy. This field identifies trustworthy reference neighborhoods per sample, ranks annotators locally, and feeds an adaptive gate that fuses the selected labels. On a real clinical dataset labeled by six pathologists and on controlled simulations, the resulting labels improve downstream MIL classification over prior multi-annotator and label-refinement baselines. The method demonstrates that joint modeling of spatial context and uncertainty produces more reliable reconciled training signals than global reliability estimates or single-instance assumptions.

Core claim

RaLMPH introduces a reliability field that jointly models local neighborhood structure in WSI feature space and expert uncertainty (entropy), enabling per-sample identification of trustworthy reference neighborhoods for local annotator ranking and adaptive gating to fuse labels conditioned on local reliability; experiments show this yields higher performance than existing global-reliability or single-instance methods on both clinical six-pathologist WSI data and simulated benchmarks.

What carries the argument

The reliability field, which jointly encodes local neighborhood structure in WSI feature space and expert uncertainty entropy to locate trustworthy reference neighborhoods for per-sample annotator ranking.

If this is right

  • Local per-sample annotator ranking produces reconciled labels that improve downstream MIL slide classification accuracy.
  • The reliability field allows adaptive fusion that conditions label weighting on both spatial context and uncertainty.
  • Performance gains appear on both real clinical data with six pathologists and on controlled simulated disagreement benchmarks.
  • The framework avoids the single-instance assumptions that limit prior label-refinement methods in MIL settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same reliability-field construction could be tested on other multi-expert MIL tasks such as video or 3D medical volumes.
  • If the local-neighborhood assumption holds across institutions, the method might reduce the frequency of pathologist consensus meetings.
  • Extending the entropy term to model systematic biases between pathologists could further tighten the reconciled labels.

Load-bearing premise

That jointly modeling local neighborhood structure in WSI feature space and expert uncertainty entropy is sufficient to identify trustworthy reference neighborhoods for per-sample annotator ranking.

What would settle it

On a held-out multi-pathologist WSI dataset, a version of RaLMPH that replaces the local reliability field with global annotator scores or random neighborhood selection shows no accuracy gain over standard MIL or existing multi-annotator baselines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.15554 by Donghee Han, Jisu Shin, Jiwon Jeong, Kyungeun Kim, Mun Yong Yi, Soeun Cheon, Sol Lee, Sungrae Hong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the RaLMPH. (a) An expert cohort provides multiple labels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: TA sample clusters in L2 and Φ distance alongside WSI examples. 6 5 4 3 2 0.4 0.6 Accuracy (a) TransMIL 6 5 4 3 2 (b) DTFD-MIL-AFS MV SL Ensemble GLAD DL-CL NWVNC IWBVT KFNN RaLMPH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Performance variation with respect to J ′ , which is plotted on the x-axis. Ablation Study. In Tab. 1, the values in the background show the abla￾tion results on the RaLMPH. Ablation Φ (i.e., L2 distance) results in a perfor￾mance decline, highlighting the validation of the joint instance bag variance and the entropy of the label. Excluding J k n also degrades the results, especially for DTFD-MIL, while ad… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Efficiency of various comparisons and RaLMPH. The efficiency is calcu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) is a standard paradigm for Whole-Slide Image (WSI) analysis and has achieved strong results in computational pathology. However, most MIL pipelines assume a single "gold" label per slide, which conflicts with clinical practice where substantial inter-pathologist variability is common. Existing multi-annotator learning and label-refinement methods typically estimate global annotator reliability or rely on single-instance assumptions, making them poorly suited to MIL and to localized diagnostic contexts where experts disagree. We propose RaLMPH (Reliability-aware Learning for Multi-Pathologist Harmonization), a MIL-based label reconciliation framework for WSIs annotated by multiple pathologists. RaLMPH introduces a reliability field that jointly models (i) local neighborhood structure in WSI feature space and (ii) expert uncertainty (entropy), enabling per-sample identification of trustworthy reference neighborhoods. Leveraging this field, RaLMPH performs sample-wise local annotator ranking to select reliable opinions per slide and applies an adaptive gating mechanism to fuse labels conditioned on local reliability. Experiments on a clinical WSI dataset with labels from six pathologists, as well as controlled simulated benchmarks, show that RaLMPH consistently outperforms existing approaches. Further analyses clarify how our reliability-aware mechanism improves label reconciliation and downstream MIL performance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes RaLMPH, a multiple instance learning (MIL) framework for reconciling labels from multiple pathologists on whole-slide images (WSIs). It constructs a reliability field that jointly captures local neighborhood structure in WSI feature space and per-expert uncertainty (via entropy) to identify trustworthy reference neighborhoods, enabling sample-wise local annotator ranking and an adaptive gating mechanism for label fusion. Experiments on a clinical WSI dataset annotated by six pathologists plus controlled simulated benchmarks are reported to show consistent outperformance over prior multi-annotator and label-refinement methods.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the work addresses a practically important gap in computational pathology: moving beyond global annotator reliability or single-instance assumptions to localized, reliability-aware reconciliation within the MIL paradigm. This could improve robustness of downstream slide-level classifiers when inter-pathologist disagreement is spatially varying. The joint neighborhood-plus-entropy construction is a concrete technical contribution that may be reusable in other multi-rater settings.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'RaLMPH consistently outperforms existing approaches' is stated without any accompanying metrics, baseline names, statistical tests, ablation results, or dataset sizes. This absence prevents verification of the empirical support for the method's advantage and is load-bearing for the paper's contribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for highlighting the need for greater specificity in the abstract. We agree that the current abstract would be strengthened by including concrete metrics, baseline names, and dataset details to better substantiate the performance claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'RaLMPH consistently outperforms existing approaches' is stated without any accompanying metrics, baseline names, statistical tests, ablation results, or dataset sizes. This absence prevents verification of the empirical support for the method's advantage and is load-bearing for the paper's contribution.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract as written provides only a high-level summary of the results. In the revised manuscript we will expand the final sentence of the abstract to report the primary quantitative improvements (e.g., accuracy or AUC gains), explicitly name the main baselines compared against, state the sizes of both the clinical dataset (number of WSIs and pathologists) and the simulated benchmarks, and reference the statistical tests used to support the “consistently outperforms” claim. These additions will be kept within abstract length limits while directly addressing the referee’s concern. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The abstract and description present RaLMPH as a MIL-based framework that constructs a reliability field from local neighborhood structure in feature space plus expert entropy, then applies local ranking and adaptive gating for label fusion. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are supplied that would allow any claimed prediction or result to reduce by construction to its own fitted inputs or prior outputs. The central performance claims rest on empirical evaluation against external clinical and simulated datasets, which are independently falsifiable and do not exhibit self-definitional, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or self-citation-load-bearing patterns within the given text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient technical detail to enumerate free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5787 in / 974 out tokens · 32319 ms · 2026-06-27T04:30:06.356950+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Database2022, baac093 (2022)

    Brancati, N., Anniciello, A.M., Pati, P., Riccio, D., Scognamiglio, G., Jaume, G., De Pietro, G., Di Bonito, M., Foncubierta, A., Botti, G., et al.: Bracs: A dataset for breast carcinoma subtyping in h&e histology images. Database2022, baac093 (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    Pathologist88, 18– 27 (2023)

    Bychkov, A., Schubert, M.: Constant demand, patchy supply. Pathologist88, 18– 27 (2023)

    2023

  3. [3]

    In:ProceedingsoftheAAAIConferenceonArtificialIntelligence.vol.35,pp.5832– 5840 (2021)

    Chu, Z., Ma, J., Wang, H.: Learning from crowds by modeling common confusions. In:ProceedingsoftheAAAIConferenceonArtificialIntelligence.vol.35,pp.5832– 5840 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    IEEE Transactions on Big Data (2025)

    Douze, M., Guzhva, A., Deng, C., Johnson, J., Szilvasy, G., Mazaré, P.E., Lomeli, M., Hosseini, L., Jégou, H.: The faiss library. IEEE Transactions on Big Data (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    bmj357(2017)

    Elmore, J.G., Barnhill, R.L., Elder, D.E., Longton, G.M., Pepe, M.S., Reisch, L.M., Carney, P.A., Titus, L.J., Nelson, H.D., Onega, T., et al.: Pathologists’ diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations: observer accuracy and repro- ducibility study. bmj357(2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    Jama313(11), 1122–1132 (2015)

    Elmore, J.G., Longton, G.M., Carney, P.A., Geller, B.M., Onega, T., Tosteson, A.N., Nelson, H.D., Pepe, M.S., Allison, K.H., Schnitt, S.J., et al.: Diagnostic con- cordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. Jama313(11), 1122–1132 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    Gadermayr, M., Tschuchnig, M.: Multiple instance learning for digital pathology: A reviewofthestate-of-the-art,limitations&futurepotential.ComputerizedMedical Imaging and Graphics112, 102337 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Guan, M., Gulshan, V., Dai, A., Hinton, G.: Who said what: Modeling individual labelersimprovesclassification.In:ProceedingsoftheAAAIconferenceonartificial intelligence. vol. 32 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    learning in pathology

    Jaume, G., Vaidya, A.J., Zhang, A., Song, A.H., Chen, R.J., Sahai, S., Mo, D., Madrigal, E., Le, L.P., Faisal, M.: Multistain pretraining for slide representation 10 Hong et al. learning in pathology. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems33(11), 6558–6568 (2021)

    Jiang,L.,Zhang,H.,Tao,F.,Li,C.:Learningfromcrowdswithmultiplenoisylabel distribution propagation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems33(11), 6558–6568 (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    Kingma, D.P.: Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    Histopathology69(3), 441–449 (2016)

    Kweldam, C.F., Nieboer, D., Algaba, F., Amin, M.B., Berney, D.M., Billis, A., Bostwick, D.G., Bubendorf, L., Cheng, L., Compérat, E., et al.: Gleason grade 4 prostate adenocarcinoma patterns: an interobserver agreement study among geni- tourinary pathologists. Histopathology69(3), 441–449 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data17(7), 1–18 (2023)

    Li, H., Jiang, L., Xue, S.: Neighborhood weighted voting-based noise correction for crowdsourcing. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data17(7), 1–18 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Nature Medicine30, 863–874 (2024)

    Lu, M.Y., Chen, B., Williamson, D.F., Chen, R.J., Liang, I., Ding, T., Jaume, G., Odintsov, I., Le, L.P., Gerber, G., et al.: A visual-language foundation model for computational pathology. Nature Medicine30, 863–874 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    Journal of machine learn- ing research9(Nov), 2579–2605 (2008)

    Maaten, L.v.d., Hinton, G.: Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learn- ing research9(Nov), 2579–2605 (2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    Human pathology32(4), 368–378 (2001)

    Montgomery, E., Bronner, M.P., Goldblum, J.R., Greenson, J.K., Haber, M.M., Hart, J., Lamps, L.W., Lauwers, G.Y., Lazenby, A.J., Lewin, D.N., et al.: Re- producibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in barrett esophagus: a reaffirmation. Human pathology32(4), 368–378 (2001)

    2001

  17. [17]

    Auto- matica11(285-296), 23–27 (1975)

    Otsu, N., et al.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Auto- matica11(285-296), 23–27 (1975)

    1975

  18. [18]

    In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

    Park, H., Hong, S., Song, C., Kim, J., Yi, M.Y.: Uncertainty-based data-wise label smoothing for calibrating multiple instance learning in histopathology image clas- sification. In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). pp. 599–608. IEEE (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

    Rodrigues, F., Pereira, F.: Deep learning from crowds. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. vol. 32 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    Advances in neural information processing systems34, 2136–2147 (2021)

    Shao, Z., Bian, H., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Ji, X., et al.: Transmil: Trans- former based correlated multiple instance learning for whole slide image classifica- tion. Advances in neural information processing systems34, 2136–2147 (2021)

    2021

  21. [21]

    In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining

    Sheng, V.S., Provost, F., Ipeirotis, P.G.: Get another label? improving data quality and data mining using multiple, noisy labelers. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. pp. 614–622 (2008)

    2008

  22. [22]

    Expert Systems with Applications117, 103–111 (2019)

    Sudharshan, P., Petitjean, C., Spanhol, F., Oliveira, L.E., Heutte, L., Honeine, P.: Multiple instance learning for histopathological breast cancer image classification. Expert Systems with Applications117, 103–111 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research72, 1385–1470 (2021)

    Uma, A.N., Fornaciari, T., Hovy, D., Paun, S., Plank, B., Poesio, M.: Learning from disagreement: A survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research72, 1385–1470 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Ap- plication in Medical Care

    Van Ginneken, A., Van der Lei, J.: Understanding differential diagnostic disagree- ment in pathology. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Ap- plication in Medical Care. p. 99 (1991)

    1991

  25. [25]

    Advances in neural information processing systems22(2009) RaLMPH 11

    Whitehill, J., Wu, T.f., Bergsma, J., Movellan, J., Ruvolo, P.: Whose vote should count more: Optimal integration of labels from labelers of unknown expertise. Advances in neural information processing systems22(2009) RaLMPH 11

    2009

  26. [26]

    Frontiers in Oncology p

    Xu, F., Zhu, C., Tang, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Jiang, H., Shi, Z., Liu, J., Jin, M.: Predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in early breast cancer using deep learning on primary tumor biopsy slides. Frontiers in Oncology p. 4133 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Zhang, H., Meng, Y., Zhao, Y., Qiao, Y., Yang, X., Coupland, S.E., Zheng, Y.: Dtfd-mil: Double-tier feature distillation multiple instance learning for histopathol- ogy whole slide image classification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 18802–18812 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2024)

    Zhang, J., Wang, G., Kalra, M.K., Yan, P.: Disease-informed adaptation of vision- language models. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 85722–85741 (2024)

    Zhang, W., Jiang, L., Li, C.: Iwbvt: Instance weighting-based bias-variance trade- off for crowdsourcing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 85722–85741 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 116493–116512 (2024)

    Zhang, W., Jiang, L., Li, C.: Kfnn: K-free nearest neighbor for crowdsourcing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 116493–116512 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Information Fusion p

    Zhang, Y., Gao, Z., He, K., Li, C., Mao, R.: From patches to wsis: A systematic review of deep multiple instance learning in computational pathology. Information Fusion p. 103027 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Advances in neural information processing systems25(2012)

    Zhou, D., Basu, S., Mao, Y., Platt, J.: Learning from the wisdom of crowds by minimax entropy. Advances in neural information processing systems25(2012)

    2012