pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17719 · v1 · pith:MPHY7KLLnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · ✦ hep-th

Aspects of Witten Diagrams for Holographic Defects

Dean Carmi , Sudip Ghosh , Trakshu Sharma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 00:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords Witten diagramsholographic defectsconformal blocksOPE coefficientscrossing kerneldefect CFTAdS/CFTLorentzian inversion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Witten diagrams for holographic defects decompose into conformal blocks with explicit OPE coefficients and closed-form crossing kernels in low dimensions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the conformal block decomposition of various Witten diagrams in holographic CFTs that include a p-dimensional conformal defect, realized by a probe AdS brane inside AdS space. It focuses on contact diagrams, tree-level exchanges, and some one-loop diagrams contributing to two-point functions of bulk scalars, plus a tree-level exchange for a mixed bulk-defect three-point function. Using an adapted split representation of the propagators, the authors extract explicit OPE coefficients in the direct channel for tree-level cases, derive recursion relations plus seed coefficients for the crossed channel in two-point exchanges, and obtain closed-form expressions for the defect-to-bulk crossing kernel in d=2,4 for point defects and d=4,6 for surface defects. These results supply concrete data that can feed into analytic functional bootstrap methods for defect CFT two-point functions.

Core claim

By adapting the split representation of AdS propagators to the probe AdS_{p+1} brane geometry, contact and tree-level exchange Witten diagrams for bulk scalar two-point functions (and one mixed three-point function) admit direct-channel decompositions into conformal blocks whose OPE coefficients are obtained in explicit form; for the two-point tree-level exchanges, recursion relations for crossed-channel coefficients are derived from seed values; separately, the bulk-channel Lorentzian inversion formula yields closed-form expressions for the defect-to-bulk crossing kernel when the defect is zero-dimensional in d=2 or 4 and when it is a surface defect in d=4 or 6.

What carries the argument

The adapted split representation of AdS propagators to the probe AdS_{p+1} brane geometry inside AdS_{d+1}, which converts the Witten diagram integrals directly into sums over conformal blocks.

If this is right

  • The explicit OPE coefficients supply input data for analytic functional bootstrap of two-point functions of bulk operators in general defect CFTs.
  • Recursion relations allow all crossed-channel coefficients in two-point tree-level exchanges to be generated once the seed coefficients are known.
  • Closed-form crossing kernels give the bulk-channel partial-wave expansion of a defect-channel partial wave for the listed defect dimensions.
  • The same adapted split-representation technique extends to some one-loop two-point diagrams.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The explicit forms may serve as a template for deriving analogous coefficients when the defect dimension p or the spacetime dimension d is increased beyond the cases treated.
  • The recursion relations and kernels could be checked against known results in free-field defect CFTs to test consistency outside the holographic limit.
  • These decompositions open a route to studying higher-point or higher-loop Witten diagrams with defects by bootstrapping from the two-point data obtained here.

Load-bearing premise

The split representation of AdS propagators adapts to the probe brane geometry so that the resulting integrals produce the conformal block decompositions without extra regularization or subtraction terms that would change the extracted OPE coefficients.

What would settle it

A direct evaluation of the bulk scalar two-point function in a concrete holographic defect model (for example a free scalar with a defect or a known AdS brane solution) followed by numerical extraction of the OPE coefficients and comparison against the paper's explicit expressions.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the conformal block decomposition of Witten diagrams for $d$-dimensional holographic CFTs in the presence of a $p$-dimensional conformal defect. The holographic dual in this case contains a probe AdS$_{p+1}$ brane embedded inside AdS$_{d+1}$. In particular, we focus on contact, tree-level exchanges and some one-loop two-point Witten diagrams, which contribute to the two-point function of CFT bulk scalar operators. We also consider a tree-level exchange diagram for a three-point function involving one CFT bulk scalar operator and two scalar operators localized on the defect. Employing the split representation of AdS propagators, adapted to the probe brane setup, we perform the direct channel conformal block decompositions of these diagrams. In the case of tree-level diagrams, we obtain explicit expressions for the OPE coefficients in the direct channel decompositions. For two-point tree-level exchange diagrams, we derive recursion relations for the coefficients in the crossed-channel block expansions and compute the seed coefficients which serve as inputs for these relations. Our explicit results for the block decomposition coefficients for tree-level Witten diagrams are potentially useful for further developing the analytic functional approach to bootstrapping two-point functions of bulk operators in general defect CFTs. We also study the crossing kernel, which encodes the bulk channel partial wave expansion of a defect channel partial wave. Using the bulk channel Lorentzian inversion formula for defect CFTs, we derive closed form expressions for this defect-to-bulk channel crossing kernel for zero-dimensional defects in $d=2,4$ dimensions and surface defects in $d=4,6$ dimensions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes conformal block decompositions of Witten diagrams (contact, tree-level exchanges, selected one-loop two-point diagrams for bulk scalar two-point functions, and one tree-level three-point diagram) in holographic defect CFTs whose dual contains a probe AdS_{p+1} brane inside AdS_{d+1}. It adapts the split representation of AdS propagators to this geometry to obtain direct-channel decompositions, explicit OPE coefficients for tree-level diagrams, recursion relations plus seed coefficients for crossed-channel expansions of two-point tree-level exchanges, and closed-form defect-to-bulk crossing kernels (via the bulk-channel Lorentzian inversion formula) for zero-dimensional defects in d=2,4 and surface defects in d=4,6.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the explicit OPE coefficients, recursion relations, and closed-form kernels supply concrete, reusable data for analytic functional bootstraps of bulk two-point functions in defect CFTs and extend standard holographic techniques to reduced-isometry defect geometries.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section describing the adapted split representation and its application to the diagrams (likely §2–3)] The adaptation of the split representation to the probe AdS_{p+1} brane (reduced isometry SO(p+1,1)×SO(d-p,1)) is load-bearing for every explicit OPE coefficient, recursion relation, and kernel. The manuscript must demonstrate that no boundary terms, cutoff dependence, or subtraction terms arise that would shift the extracted coefficients; otherwise the numerical values reported in the direct- and crossed-channel results are not guaranteed to be correct.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to “some one-loop two-point Witten diagrams” without specifying which diagrams or which bulk operators; an explicit list would improve readability.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the defect dimension p and the embedding coordinates should be introduced with a short diagram or coordinate chart in the introduction to aid readers unfamiliar with probe-brane setups.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for acknowledging the potential utility of our explicit OPE coefficients, recursion relations, and crossing kernels for analytic functional bootstraps in defect CFTs. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The adaptation of the split representation to the probe AdS_{p+1} brane (reduced isometry SO(p+1,1)×SO(d-p,1)) is load-bearing for every explicit OPE coefficient, recursion relation, and kernel. The manuscript must demonstrate that no boundary terms, cutoff dependence, or subtraction terms arise that would shift the extracted coefficients; otherwise the numerical values reported in the direct- and crossed-channel results are not guaranteed to be correct.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. In adapting the split representation, the bulk-to-bulk propagator is decomposed using the reduced isometry SO(p+1,1)×SO(d-p,1), with the integration contour chosen to lie between the branch cuts associated with the defect brane. The resulting expressions are obtained by closing contours in the complex plane, where the contributions at infinity vanish due to the exponential fall-off of the AdS wave functions in both the parallel and transverse directions. When the defect fills the entire boundary (p = d-1), our formulae reduce exactly to the standard AdS results without additional subtractions, providing a consistency check. No cutoff dependence appears because all integrals are convergent without regularization. We will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) in the revised manuscript that explicitly displays the contour choices, demonstrates the vanishing of boundary terms, and confirms that the extracted OPE coefficients and kernels remain unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations are direct computations from adapted propagators and inversion formulas

full rationale

The paper derives OPE coefficients, recursion relations, and crossing kernels via explicit use of the split representation adapted to the probe brane and the bulk-channel Lorentzian inversion formula for defect CFTs. No equations reduce results to fitted inputs by construction, no load-bearing self-citations from the same authors are invoked to justify uniqueness or ansatze, and no renaming of known results occurs. The central claims rest on the stated adaptation and formulas without the derivation chain collapsing to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Work rests on the standard holographic dictionary and the validity of the split representation when restricted to a probe brane; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The split representation of bulk-to-bulk propagators remains valid after embedding a probe AdS_{p+1} brane inside AdS_{d+1}.
    Invoked to perform the conformal block decompositions of the listed Witten diagrams.
  • domain assumption The bulk-channel Lorentzian inversion formula extends to defect CFTs without modification.
    Used to obtain the closed-form crossing kernels.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5828 in / 1502 out tokens · 30244 ms · 2026-06-27T00:05:16.154748+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gluon GTMD at strong coupling: fixed-spin saddle factorization and Reggeization

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The paper derives factorization of fixed-spin conformal moments of unpolarized gluon GTMDs into a universal staple-worldsheet soft factor and a target-dependent Witten amplitude, with UV/IR reductions and Reggeization...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 42 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Anti de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti de Sitter space and holography,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291,arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,”Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105–114,arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    The Bootstrap Program for Boundary CFTd,

    P. Liendo, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “The Bootstrap Program for Boundary CFTd,” JHEP07(2013) 113,arXiv:1210.4258 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Boundary and Interface CFTs from the Conformal Bootstrap,

    F. Gliozzi, P. Liendo, M. Meineri, and A. Rago, “Boundary and Interface CFTs from the Conformal Bootstrap,”JHEP05(2015) 036,arXiv:1502.07217 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 12, 093 (2021)]

    arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Universality at large transverse spin in defect CFT,

    M. Lemos, P. Liendo, M. Meineri, and S. Sarkar, “Universality at large transverse spin in defect CFT,”JHEP09(2018) 091,arXiv:1712.08185 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    A Lorentzian inversion formula for defect CFT,

    P. Liendo, Y. Linke, and V. Schomerus, “A Lorentzian inversion formula for defect CFT,” JHEP08(2020) 163,arXiv:1903.05222 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Analytic Bootstrap for Boundary CFT,

    A. Bissi, T. Hansen, and A. Söderberg, “Analytic Bootstrap for Boundary CFT,”JHEP01 (2019) 010,arXiv:1808.08155 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    An analytic approach to BCFTd,

    D. Mazáč, L. Rastelli, and X. Zhou, “An analytic approach to BCFTd,”JHEP12(2019) 004,arXiv:1812.09314 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    The Functional Bootstrap for Boundary CFT,

    A. Kaviraj and M. F. Paulos, “The Functional Bootstrap for Boundary CFT,”JHEP04 (2020) 135,arXiv:1812.04034 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    A dispersion relation for defect CFT,

    J. Barrat, A. Gimenez-Grau, and P. Liendo, “A dispersion relation for defect CFT,”JHEP 02(2023) 255,arXiv:2205.09765 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Conformal dispersion relations for defects and boundaries,

    L. Bianchi and D. Bonomi, “Conformal dispersion relations for defects and boundaries,” SciPost Phys.15no. 2, (2023) 055,arXiv:2205.09775 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Open and closed string interpretation of SUSY CFT’s on branes with boundaries,

    A. Karch and L. Randall, “Open and closed string interpretation of SUSY CFT’s on branes with boundaries,”JHEP06(2001) 063,arXiv:hep-th/0105132

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  14. [14]

    Locally localized gravity,

    A. Karch and L. Randall, “Locally localized gravity,”JHEP05(2001) 008, arXiv:hep-th/0011156

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  15. [15]

    Defect conformal field theory and locally localized gravity,

    O. Aharony, O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman, and A. Karch, “Defect conformal field theory and locally localized gravity,”JHEP07(2003) 030,arXiv:hep-th/0303249

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  16. [16]

    Holography and defect conformal field theories,

    O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman, and H. Ooguri, “Holography and defect conformal field theories,”Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 025009,arXiv:hep-th/0111135

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  17. [17]

    Four-dimensional superconformal theories with interacting boundaries or defects,

    J. Erdmenger, Z. Guralnik, and I. Kirsch, “Four-dimensional superconformal theories with interacting boundaries or defects,”Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 025020,arXiv:hep-th/0203020

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  18. [18]

    Defect CFT in the 6d (2,0) theory from M2 brane dynamics in AdS7×S4,

    N. Drukker, S. Giombi, A. A. Tseytlin, and X. Zhou, “Defect CFT in the 6d (2,0) theory from M2 brane dynamics in AdS7×S4,”JHEP07(2020) 101,arXiv:2004.04562 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Bootstrapping holographic defect correlators in N= 4 super Yang-Mills,

    J. Barrat, A. Gimenez-Grau, and P. Liendo, “Bootstrapping holographic defect correlators in N= 4 super Yang-Mills,”JHEP04(2022) 093,arXiv:2108.13432 [hep-th]. – 53 –

    arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Defect two-point functions in 6D (2,0) theories,

    J. Chen, A. Gimenez-Grau, and X. Zhou, “Defect two-point functions in 6D (2,0) theories,” Phys. Rev. D109no. 6, (2024) L061903,arXiv:2310.19230 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Correlators of N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory on Real Projective Space at Strong Coupling,

    X. Zhou, “Correlators of N=4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory on Real Projective Space at Strong Coupling,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 20, (2024) 201602,arXiv:2408.04926 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Unitarity method for holographic defects,

    J. Chen, A. Gimenez-Grau, H. Paul, and X. Zhou, “Unitarity method for holographic defects,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 4, (2025) L041703,arXiv:2406.13287 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Giant Graviton Correlators as Defect Systems,

    J. Chen, Y. Jiang, and X. Zhou, “Giant Graviton Correlators as Defect Systems,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 8, (2025) 081602,arXiv:2503.22987 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Defect Approach to Giant Graviton Dynamics,

    J. Chen, Y. Jiang, and X. Zhou, “Defect Approach to Giant Graviton Dynamics,” arXiv:2602.13570 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [25]

    Scattering from (p, q)-strings in AdS5 ×S 5,

    S. S. Pufu, V. A. Rodriguez, and Y. Wang, “Scattering from (p, q)-strings in AdS5 ×S 5,” JHEP03(2025) 181,arXiv:2305.08297 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    The Witten Diagram Bootstrap for Holographic Defects,

    A. Gimenez-Grau, “The Witten Diagram Bootstrap for Holographic Defects,” arXiv:2306.11896 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  27. [27]

    Exact Correlators on the Wilson Loop inN= 4SYM: Localization, Defect CFT, and Integrability,

    S. Giombi and S. Komatsu, “Exact Correlators on the Wilson Loop inN= 4SYM: Localization, Defect CFT, and Integrability,”JHEP05(2018) 109,arXiv:1802.05201 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 11, 123 (2018)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    More Exact Results in the Wilson Loop Defect CFT: Bulk-Defect OPE, Nonplanar Corrections and Quantum Spectral Curve,

    S. Giombi and S. Komatsu, “More Exact Results in the Wilson Loop Defect CFT: Bulk-Defect OPE, Nonplanar Corrections and Quantum Spectral Curve,”J. Phys. A52 no. 12, (2019) 125401,arXiv:1811.02369 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Non-perturbative defect one-point functions in planarN= 4 super-Yang-Mills,

    S. Komatsu and Y. Wang, “Non-perturbative defect one-point functions in planarN= 4 super-Yang-Mills,”Nucl. Phys. B958(2020) 115120,arXiv:2004.09514 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Two-point correlator of chiral primary operators with a Wilson line defect inN= 4 SYM,

    J. Barrat, P. Liendo, and J. Plefka, “Two-point correlator of chiral primary operators with a Wilson line defect inN= 4 SYM,”JHEP05(2021) 195,arXiv:2011.04678 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Mellin amplitudes forAdS5 ×S 5,

    L. Rastelli and X. Zhou, “Mellin amplitudes forAdS5 ×S 5,”Phys. Rev. Lett.118no. 9, (2017) 091602,arXiv:1608.06624 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    How to Succeed at Holographic Correlators Without Really Trying,

    L. Rastelli and X. Zhou, “How to Succeed at Holographic Correlators Without Really Trying,”JHEP04(2018) 014,arXiv:1710.05923 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Selected topics in analytic conformal bootstrap: A guided journey,

    A. Bissi, A. Sinha, and X. Zhou, “Selected topics in analytic conformal bootstrap: A guided journey,”Phys. Rept.991(2022) 1–89,arXiv:2202.08475 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    A Conformal Dispersion Relation: Correlations from Absorption,

    D. Carmi and S. Caron-Huot, “A Conformal Dispersion Relation: Correlations from Absorption,”JHEP09(2020) 009,arXiv:1910.12123 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Dispersive CFT Sum Rules,

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Dispersive CFT Sum Rules,” JHEP05(2021) 243,arXiv:2008.04931 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations for Mellin Amplitudes,

    R. Gopakumar, A. Sinha, and A. Zahed, “Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations for Mellin Amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 21, (2021) 211602,arXiv:2101.09017 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Dispersion relations and exact bounds on CFT correlators,

    M. F. Paulos, “Dispersion relations and exact bounds on CFT correlators,”JHEP08(2021) 166,arXiv:2012.10454 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Conformal Bootstrap in Mellin Space,

    R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen, and A. Sinha, “Conformal Bootstrap in Mellin Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118no. 8, (2017) 081601,arXiv:1609.00572 [hep-th]. – 54 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    A Mellin space approach to the conformal bootstrap,

    R. Gopakumar, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen, and A. Sinha, “A Mellin space approach to the conformal bootstrap,”JHEP05(2017) 027,arXiv:1611.08407 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    On the Polyakov-Mellin bootstrap,

    R. Gopakumar and A. Sinha, “On the Polyakov-Mellin bootstrap,”JHEP12(2018) 040, arXiv:1809.10975 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    The analytic functional bootstrap. Part I: 1D CFTs and 2D S-matrices,

    D. Mazac and M. F. Paulos, “The analytic functional bootstrap. Part I: 1D CFTs and 2D S-matrices,”JHEP02(2019) 162,arXiv:1803.10233 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    The analytic functional bootstrap. Part II. Natural bases for the crossing equation,

    D. Mazac and M. F. Paulos, “The analytic functional bootstrap. Part II. Natural bases for the crossing equation,”JHEP02(2019) 163,arXiv:1811.10646 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    A basis of analytic functionals for CFTs in general dimension,

    D. Mazáč, L. Rastelli, and X. Zhou, “A basis of analytic functionals for CFTs in general dimension,”JHEP08(2021) 140,arXiv:1910.12855 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    Witten Diagrams Revisited: The AdS Geometry of Conformal Blocks,

    E. Hijano, P. Kraus, E. Perlmutter, and R. Snively, “Witten Diagrams Revisited: The AdS Geometry of Conformal Blocks,”JHEP01(2016) 146,arXiv:1508.00501 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    Boundary Holographic Witten Diagrams,

    A. Karch and Y. Sato, “Boundary Holographic Witten Diagrams,”JHEP09(2017) 121, arXiv:1708.01328 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    More on Boundary Holographic Witten Diagrams,

    Y. Sato, “More on Boundary Holographic Witten Diagrams,”Phys. Rev. D97no. 2, (2018) 026005,arXiv:1711.02138 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    The Mellin Formalism for Boundary CFTd,

    L. Rastelli and X. Zhou, “The Mellin Formalism for Boundary CFTd,”JHEP10(2017) 146, arXiv:1705.05362 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes,

    J. Penedones, “Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes,”JHEP03 (2011) 025,arXiv:1011.1485 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  49. [49]

    Spinning AdS Propagators,

    M. S. Costa, V. Gonçalves, and J. Penedones, “Spinning AdS Propagators,”JHEP09(2014) 064,arXiv:1404.5625 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  50. [50]

    Spinning Witten Diagrams,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Spinning Witten Diagrams,”JHEP06(2017) 100, arXiv:1702.08619 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Spinning AdS Loop Diagrams: Two Point Functions,

    S. Giombi, C. Sleight, and M. Taronna, “Spinning AdS Loop Diagrams: Two Point Functions,”JHEP06(2018) 030,arXiv:1708.08404 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Anatomy of Geodesic Witten Diagrams,

    H.-Y. Chen, E.-J. Kuo, and H. Kyono, “Anatomy of Geodesic Witten Diagrams,”JHEP05 (2017) 070,arXiv:1702.08818 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Recursion Relations in Witten Diagrams and Conformal Partial Waves,

    X. Zhou, “Recursion Relations in Witten Diagrams and Conformal Partial Waves,”JHEP05 (2019) 006,arXiv:1812.01006 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    Loops in AdS: From the Spectral Representation to Position Space,

    D. Carmi, “Loops in AdS: From the Spectral Representation to Position Space,”JHEP06 (2020) 049,arXiv:1910.14340 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Loops in AdS: from the spectral representation to position space. Part II,

    D. Carmi, “Loops in AdS: from the spectral representation to position space. Part II,”JHEP 07(2021) 186,arXiv:2104.10500 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  56. [56]

    Loops in AdS: from the spectral representation to position space. Part III,

    D. Carmi, “Loops in AdS: from the spectral representation to position space. Part III,” JHEP08(2024) 193,arXiv:2402.02481 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    A note on defect Mellin amplitudes,

    V. Goncalves and G. Itsios, “A note on defect Mellin amplitudes,”JHEP11(2023) 001, arXiv:1803.06721 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Flat-space limit of defect correlators and stringy AdS form factors,

    L. F. Alday and X. Zhou, “Flat-space limit of defect correlators and stringy AdS form factors,”JHEP03(2025) 182,arXiv:2411.04378 [hep-th]. – 55 –

    arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Unitarity Methods in AdS/CFT,

    D. Meltzer, E. Perlmutter, and A. Sivaramakrishnan, “Unitarity Methods in AdS/CFT,” JHEP03(2020) 061,arXiv:1912.09521 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Conformal constraints on defects,

    A. Gadde, “Conformal constraints on defects,”JHEP01(2020) 038,arXiv:1602.06354 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Defects in conformal field theory,

    M. Billò, V. Gonçalves, E. Lauria, and M. Meineri, “Defects in conformal field theory,” JHEP04(2016) 091,arXiv:1601.02883 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    Graviton exchange and complete four point functions in the AdS / CFT correspondence,

    E. D’Hoker, D. Z. Freedman, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis, and L. Rastelli, “Graviton exchange and complete four point functions in the AdS / CFT correspondence,”Nucl. Phys. B562 (1999) 353–394,arXiv:hep-th/9903196

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  63. [63]

    Nonperturbative Mellin Amplitudes: Existence, Properties, Applications,

    J. Penedones, J. A. Silva, and A. Zhiboedov, “Nonperturbative Mellin Amplitudes: Existence, Properties, Applications,”JHEP08(2020) 031,arXiv:1912.11100 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Harmonic Analysis and Mean Field Theory,

    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Harmonic Analysis and Mean Field Theory,”JHEP10(2019) 217,arXiv:1809.05111 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Consequences of symmetry-breaking on conformal defect data,

    B. Girault, M. F. Paulos, and P. van Vliet, “Consequences of symmetry-breaking on conformal defect data,”arXiv:2509.26561 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  66. [66]

    d-dimensional SYK, AdS Loops, and6jSymbols,

    J. Liu, E. Perlmutter, V. Rosenhaus, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “d-dimensional SYK, AdS Loops, and6jSymbols,”JHEP03(2019) 052,arXiv:1808.00612 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,

    S. Caron-Huot, “Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,”JHEP09(2017) 078, arXiv:1703.00278 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    The Inversion Formula and 6j Symbol for 3d Fermions,

    S. Albayrak, D. Meltzer, and D. Poland, “The Inversion Formula and 6j Symbol for 3d Fermions,”JHEP09(2020) 148,arXiv:2006.07374 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Crossing Kernels for Boundary and Crosscap CFTs,

    M. Hogervorst, “Crossing Kernels for Boundary and Crosscap CFTs,”arXiv:1703.08159 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    Crossing symmetry in alpha space,

    M. Hogervorst and B. C. van Rees, “Crossing symmetry in alpha space,”JHEP11(2017) 193,arXiv:1702.08471 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Calogero-Sutherland Approach to Defect Blocks,

    M. Isachenkov, P. Liendo, Y. Linke, and V. Schomerus, “Calogero-Sutherland Approach to Defect Blocks,”JHEP10(2018) 204,arXiv:1806.09703 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    Spinning conformal defects,

    N. Kobayashi and T. Nishioka, “Spinning conformal defects,”JHEP09(2018) 134, arXiv:1805.05967 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    Spinning operators and defects in conformal field theory,

    E. Lauria, M. Meineri, and E. Trevisani, “Spinning operators and defects in conformal field theory,”JHEP08(2019) 066,arXiv:1807.02522 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Two point functions in defect CFTs,

    C. P. Herzog and A. Shrestha, “Two point functions in defect CFTs,”JHEP04(2021) 226, arXiv:2010.04995 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    Weight Shifting Operators and Conformal Blocks,

    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Weight Shifting Operators and Conformal Blocks,”JHEP02(2018) 081,arXiv:1706.07813 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    AdS Weight Shifting Operators,

    M. S. Costa and T. Hansen, “AdS Weight Shifting Operators,”JHEP09(2018) 040, arXiv:1805.01492 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Aspects of higher-point functions in BCFTd,

    J. Chen and X. Zhou, “Aspects of higher-point functions in BCFTd,”JHEP09(2023) 204, arXiv:2304.11799 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Line and surface defects for the free scalar field,

    E. Lauria, P. Liendo, B. C. Van Rees, and X. Zhao, “Line and surface defects for the free scalar field,”JHEP01(2021) 060,arXiv:2005.02413 [hep-th]. – 56 –

    arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Lightcone Bootstrap for Multipoint Defect Correlators,

    L. Bianchi, A. Mattiello, and L. Quintavalle, “Lightcone Bootstrap for Multipoint Defect Correlators,”arXiv:2602.23428 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  80. [80]

    Spinning Mellin Bootstrap: Conformal Partial Waves, Crossing Kernels and Applications,

    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, “Spinning Mellin Bootstrap: Conformal Partial Waves, Crossing Kernels and Applications,”Fortsch. Phys.66no. 8-9, (2018) 1800038,arXiv:1804.09334 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.