pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18040 · v1 · pith:P4DOZPDTnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · 🪐 quant-ph

Full-state information-disturbance tradeoff for direction estimation with antiparallel spin-coherent pairs

Massimiliano F. Sacchi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 00:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum estimationinformation-disturbance tradeoffspin coherent statesantiparallel spinscovariant instrumentsdirection estimation
0
0 comments X

The pith

For two antiparallel spin-1/2 particles the optimal direction estimator is a covariant filter with scalar-vector coherence, recovering the maximum information score while producing smaller disturbance than the parallel benchmark.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper determines the optimal information-disturbance tradeoff when an unknown spatial direction is encoded in a pair of antiparallel spins. Rotational covariance reduces the search over all quantum instruments to a finite-dimensional optimization whose solution is found by solving a dual problem and reading off kernel vectors of the slack operator. For spin-1/2 particles the resulting optimal instrument is a covariant filter that permits coherence between scalar and vector sectors and is not in general any convex combination of the identity channel with a measure-and-reprepare strategy. At the point of maximum information the known score is recovered, yet the output state is disturbed less than both the parallel-spin case and the antiparallel measure-and-reprepare strategy. The same covariance reduction is applied to antiparallel spin-coherent states of arbitrary spin j, where endpoint information is controlled by nearest-neighbor sector coherences and disturbance follows from a block-diagonal eigenvalue problem.

Core claim

For two antiparallel spin-1/2 particles the optimal operation is a covariant filter with scalar-vector coherence. This operation is generally not a convex interpolation between the identity channel and a measure-and-reprepare strategy. At maximum information the known score is recovered, but the least disturbing output state is optimized independently, giving smaller disturbance than both the parallel-spin benchmark and antiparallel measure-and-reprepare. For arbitrary spin j the signal occupies sectors from 0 to 2j, endpoint information depends on nearest-neighbor coherences, and endpoint disturbance is obtained from an explicit finite block-diagonal eigenvalue problem.

What carries the argument

A positive seed operator in the finite-dimensional Choi representation that obeys one trace constraint for each irreducible sector of the input representation, with directional score and operation fidelity expressed as linear functionals of the seed.

If this is right

  • The optimal instrument recovers the maximum information score while independently optimizing the least disturbing output state.
  • For antiparallel spin-coherent states of arbitrary spin j the endpoint information is governed by nearest-neighbor sector coherences.
  • The endpoint disturbance follows from solving an explicit finite block-diagonal eigenvalue problem.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The sector-constrained seed-operator method may extend to other symmetric estimation tasks on composite systems where the representation decomposes into multiple irreducible sectors.
  • Reading the optimal instrument from the kernel vectors of the dual slack operator offers a practical route for solving similar semidefinite programs that arise in covariant quantum channels.
  • The pattern of coherence between adjacent angular-momentum sectors for higher j suggests that the tradeoff may exhibit a simple recursive structure across spin values.

Load-bearing premise

Rotational covariance reduces the optimization over all instruments to a finite-dimensional Choi problem in which a positive seed operator obeys one trace constraint for each irreducible sector of the input representation.

What would settle it

An explicit non-covariant instrument whose information-disturbance curve lies strictly above the derived covariant optimum would show that the symmetry reduction misses superior operations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18040 by Massimiliano F. Sacchi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Optimal information–disturbance tradeoffs for two-spin direction encoding. The solid curve is the antiparallel spin- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Normalized squared traces of the Kraus seeds along the optimal tradeoffs for two spin- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Optimal information–disturbance tradeoffs for two-spin direction encoding with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Endpoint comparison for antiparallel and parallel spin-coherent encodings as a function of the spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We determine the optimal information--disturbance tradeoff for estimating an unknown spatial direction encoded in two antiparallel spins. Rotational covariance reduces the optimization over all instruments to a finite-dimensional Choi problem: a positive seed operator obeys one trace constraint for each irreducible sector of the input representation, while both the directional score and the operation fidelity are linear functionals of this seed. For two antiparallel spin-$1/2$ particles, whose physical representation decomposes as $0\oplus1$, we derive the two-multiplier dual problem and characterize the optimal instrument from the kernel vectors of the dual slack operator. The optimal operation is a covariant filter with scalar--vector coherence and is generally not a convex interpolation between the identity channel and a measure-and-reprepare strategy. At maximum information we recover the Gisin--Popescu score, but the least disturbing output state is optimized independently, giving a smaller disturbance than both the parallel-spin benchmark and antiparallel measure-and-reprepare. We also formulate the parallel benchmark and, as a central extension of the method, treat antiparallel spin-coherent states of arbitrary spin $j$. In this case the signal coherently occupies all sectors $\ell=0,\ldots,2j$ of $j\otimes j$, the endpoint information is governed by nearest-neighbor sector coherences, and the endpoint disturbance is obtained from an explicit finite block-diagonal eigenvalue problem.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to derive the optimal information-disturbance tradeoff for estimating an unknown spatial direction encoded in two antiparallel spin-1/2 particles (and its extension to arbitrary spin j). Rotational covariance reduces the optimization over instruments to a finite-dimensional problem over a positive seed operator in the Choi representation, subject to one trace constraint per irreducible sector of the input representation (0 ⊕ 1 for spin-1/2). The dual SDP with two multipliers is solved, and the optimal instrument is characterized from the kernel vectors of the dual slack operator. The resulting operation is a covariant filter with scalar-vector coherence, shown to be generally not a convex interpolation between the identity channel and measure-and-reprepare. At maximum information the Gisin-Popescu score is recovered, but with independently optimized (smaller) disturbance than both the parallel benchmark and antiparallel measure-and-reprepare. For general j the signal occupies sectors ℓ=0 to 2j, with endpoint information governed by nearest-neighbor coherences and disturbance from an explicit finite block-diagonal eigenvalue problem.

Significance. If the derivation holds, the work supplies an exact analytical characterization of the full tradeoff curve for this setup, extending the Gisin-Popescu and parallel-spin benchmarks with an explicit method applicable to arbitrary j. Strengths include the parameter-free reduction via Schur's lemma to a finite Choi seed, the standard SDP duality yielding the kernel-vector characterization, and the finite block-diagonal eigenvalue problem for the general-j disturbance; these are reproducible analytical results without fitted parameters.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the term 'scalar--vector coherence' is used without a preceding definition or equation reference; a one-sentence gloss in the introduction (e.g., linking it to off-diagonal blocks between ℓ=0 and ℓ=1 sectors) would aid readability.
  2. The extension to arbitrary j is presented as a central contribution, yet the manuscript does not include an explicit small-j example (e.g., j=1) showing the block-diagonal matrix and its eigenvalues; adding one would make the finite-block claim more concrete without lengthening the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive review, detailed summary of our results, and the recommendation to accept. There are no major comments requiring a point-by-point response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The derivation applies Schur's lemma to the SU(2) action on the two-particle space (0 ⊕ 1 for antiparallel spin-1/2), reducing the instrument optimization to a finite-dimensional Choi seed with one trace constraint per irrep sector; both the directional score and operation fidelity are linear in this seed. The dual SDP with two multipliers and kernel-vector characterization of the optimum follows directly from standard covariant-instrument duality. The claim that the optimum is a coherent scalar-vector filter (rather than a convex combination of identity and measure-reprepare) is an explicit output of solving this SDP, not an input assumption. Recovery of the Gisin-Popescu score at maximum information is a consistency check against an external benchmark, while the independently optimized disturbance is smaller than both the parallel benchmark and antiparallel measure-reprepare; the parallel benchmark itself is formulated inside the same framework. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same author. The method is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work relies on standard representation theory of rotations and quantum channel optimization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5782 in / 1132 out tokens · 24191 ms · 2026-06-27T00:12:19.201498+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references

  1. [1]

    General fixed-POVM construction Let the fixed endpoint POVM be rank one and covariant, with seed|ηz⟩⟨ηz|. For the outcome⃗ n=g⃗ zwe write |η⃗ n⟩=V g|ηz⟩.(B1) At the endpoint, a covariant choice of pure output states is similarly generated from a single fiducial vector|φz⟩, |φ⃗ n⟩=V g|φz⟩.(B2) For a true input|ψz⟩, define ρz =|ψ z⟩⟨ψz|, p(g|z) =p(⃗ n|z) =|...

  2. [2]

    Antiparallel spin-jrepresentation We now derive the block formula used in Eq. (114). We use the coupled basis|ℓ, m⟩ and the Wigner-matrix convention [61] U (ℓ) g |ℓ, m′⟩= X m D(ℓ) mm′(g)|ℓ, m⟩.(B7) The endpoint likelihood is the functionTj(nz)2 defined in Eqs. (103) and (104). Its dependence only onnz = cosθ follows from the identity D(ℓ) 00 (g) =d ℓ 00(θ...

  3. [3]

    VIII: the two-spin signal is equivalent to the spin-J coherent state withJ= 2jand fiducial vector|J, J⟩

    Parallel spin-jrepresentation For the parallel endpoint we use the notation of Sec. VIII: the two-spin signal is equivalent to the spin-J coherent state withJ= 2jand fiducial vector|J, J⟩. Starting from Eq. (117), theJ z-basis matrix elements are ⟨J, m|Q∥ J |J, m′⟩= Z d⃗ n pJ(nz)D(J) mJ(g−1)D(J) Jm ′(g).(B12) Since the likelihoodpJ(nz)in Eq. (115) depends...

  4. [4]

    Heisenberg, Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik, Z

    W. Heisenberg, Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik, Z. Phys.43, 172 (1927)

    1927

  5. [5]

    C. W. Helstrom,Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory(Academic Press, New York, 1976)

    1976

  6. [6]

    C. A. Fuchs and A. Peres, Quantum-state disturbance versus information gain: Uncertainty relations for quantum information, Phys. Rev. A53, 2038 (1996)

    2038

  7. [7]

    Banaszek, Fidelity balance in quantum operations, Phys

    K. Banaszek, Fidelity balance in quantum operations, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1366 (2001)

    2001

  8. [8]

    Banaszek and I

    K. Banaszek and I. Devetak, Fidelity trade-off for finite ensembles of identically prepared qubits, Phys. Rev. A64, 052307 (2001)

    2001

  9. [9]

    C. A. Fuchs and K. Jacobs, Information-tradeoff relations for finite-strength quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. A63, 062305 (2001)

    2001

  10. [10]

    Ozawa, Uncertainty relations for noise and disturbance in generalized quantum measurements, Ann

    M. Ozawa, Uncertainty relations for noise and disturbance in generalized quantum measurements, Ann. Phys.311, 350 (2004)

    2004

  11. [11]

    Mišta Jr., J

    L. Mišta Jr., J. Fiurášek, and R. Filip, Optimal partial estimation of multiple phases, Phys. Rev. A72, 012311 (2005)

    2005

  12. [12]

    U. L. Andersen, M. Sabuncu, R. Filip, and G. Leuchs, Experimental demonstration of coherent state estimation with minimal disturbance, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 020409 (2006)

    2006

  13. [13]

    M. F. Sacchi, Information-disturbance tradeoff in estimating a maximally entangled state, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 220502 (2006)

    2006

  14. [14]

    Buscemi and M

    F. Buscemi and M. F. Sacchi, Information-disturbance trade-off in quantum-state discrimination, Phys. Rev. A74, 052320 (2006)

    2006

  15. [15]

    M. F. Sacchi, Information-disturbance tradeoff for spin coherent state estimation, Phys. Rev. A75, 012306 (2007)

    2007

  16. [16]

    S.-W. Lee, J. Kim, and H. Nha, Complete information balance in quantum measurement, Quantum5, 414 (2021)

    2021

  17. [17]

    Hong, Y.-S

    S. Hong, Y.-S. Kim, Y.-W. Cho, J. Kim, S.-W. Lee, and H.-T. Lim, Demonstration of complete information trade-off in quantum measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 050401 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Saberian, S

    N. Saberian, S. J. Akhtarshenas, and F. Shahbeigi, Measurement sharpness and disturbance tradeoff, Phys. Rev. A109, 012201 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Asadian, F

    A. Asadian, F. Gams, and S. Sponar, Covariant correlation-disturbance relation and its experimental realization with spin-1/2particles, Phys. Rev. Research8, L012011 (2026)

    2026

  20. [20]

    A. S. Holevo,Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982; Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2011)

    1982

  21. [21]

    Massar and S

    S. Massar and S. Popescu, Optimal extraction of information from finite quantum ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 1259 (1995)

    1995

  22. [22]

    Derka, V

    R. Derka, V. Bužek, and A. K. Ekert, Universal algorithm for optimal estimation of quantum states from finite ensembles via realizable generalized measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1571 (1998)

    1998

  23. [23]

    J. I. Latorre, P. Pascual, and R. Tarrach, Minimal optimal generalized quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 1351 (1998)

    1998

  24. [24]

    Gisin and S

    N. Gisin and S. Popescu, Spin flips and quantum information for antiparallel spins, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 432 (1999)

    1999

  25. [25]

    Peres and P

    A. Peres and P. F. Scudo, Entangled quantum states as direction indicators, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 4160 (2001)

    2001

  26. [26]

    Bagan, M

    E. Bagan, M. Baig, and R. Muñoz-Tapia, Aligning reference frames with quantum states, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 257903 (2001)

    2001

  27. [27]

    Zhang, X

    S. Zhang, X. Zou, C. Li, C. Jin, and G. Guo, Information–disturbance tradeoff in sending direction information via antiparallel quantum spin, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.43, 235301 (2010)

    2010

  28. [28]

    Peres and W

    A. Peres and W. K. Wootters, Optimal detection of quantum information, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 1119 (1991)

    1991

  29. [29]

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens, Decoherence-full subsystems and the cryptographic power of a private shared reference frame, Phys. Rev. A70, 032307 (2004)

    2004

  30. [30]

    Chiribella, G

    G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and M. F. Sacchi, Efficient use of quantum resources for the transmission of a reference frame, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 180503 (2004)

    2004

  31. [32]

    Chiribella, G

    G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and M. F. Sacchi, Covariant quantum measurements that maximize the likelihood, Phys. Rev. A70, 062105 (2004)

    2004

  32. [33]

    Chiribella, L

    G. Chiribella, L. Maccone, and P. Perinotti, Secret quantum communication of a reference frame, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 120501 (2007)

    2007

  33. [34]

    J.-F. Tang, Z. Hou, J. Shang, H. Zhu, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Experimental optimal orienteering via parallel and antiparallel spins, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 060502 (2020)

    2020

  34. [35]

    R. K. Patra, K. Agarwal, B. Paul, S. Roy Chowdhury, S. G. Naik, and M. Banik, Quantum incompatibility in parallel versus antiparallel spins, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 110402 (2026)

    2026

  35. [36]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe,Convex Optimization(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004). 25

    2004

  36. [37]

    Watrous,The Theory of Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018)

    J. Watrous,The Theory of Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018)

    2018

  37. [38]

    Hayashi,Group Representation for Quantum Theory(Springer, Cham, 2017)

    M. Hayashi,Group Representation for Quantum Theory(Springer, Cham, 2017)

    2017

  38. [39]

    E. B. Davies and J. T. Lewis, An operational approach to quantum probability, Commun. Math. Phys.17, 239 (1970)

    1970

  39. [40]

    E. B. Davies,Quantum Theory of Open Systems(Academic Press, London, 1976)

    1976

  40. [41]

    Ozawa, Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables, J

    M. Ozawa, Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables, J. Math. Phys.25, 79 (1984)

    1984

  41. [42]

    A. S. Holevo, Covariant measurements and imprimitivity systems, inQuantum Probability and Applications to the Quantum Theory of Irreversible Processes, Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 1055, edited by L. Accardi, A. Frigerio, and V. Gorini (Springer, Berlin, 1984), pp. 153–172

    1984

  42. [43]

    A. S. Holevo, Covariant measurements and uncertainty relations, inQuantum Communication, Computing, and Measurement, edited by O. Hirota, A. S. Holevo, and C. M. Caves (Plenum, New York, 1997), pp. 223–232

    1997

  43. [44]

    Kraus,States, Effects, and Operations(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983)

    K. Kraus,States, Effects, and Operations(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983)

    1983

  44. [45]

    Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Rep

    A. Jamiołkowski, Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 275 (1972)

    1972

  45. [46]

    Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra Appl.10, 285 (1975)

    M.-D. Choi, Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices, Linear Algebra Appl.10, 285 (1975)

    1975

  46. [47]

    Carmeli, T

    C. Carmeli, T. Heinosaari, and A. Toigo, Covariant quantum instruments, J. Funct. Anal.257, 3353 (2009)

    2009

  47. [48]

    G. M. D’Ariano, P. Lo Presti, and M. F. Sacchi, Bell measurements and observables, Phys. Lett. A272, 32 (2000)

    2000

  48. [49]

    Buscemi, G

    F. Buscemi, G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and M. F. Sacchi, Optimal realization of the transposition maps, Phys. Lett. A 314, 374 (2003)

    2003

  49. [50]

    Bagan, M

    E. Bagan, M. Baig, A. Brey, R. Muñoz-Tapia, and R. Tarrach, Optimal encoding and decoding of a spin direction, Phys. Rev. A63, 052309 (2001)

    2001

  50. [51]

    Popescu, A

    S. Popescu, A. B. Sainz, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Quantum reference frames and their applications to thermodynamics, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A376, 20180111 (2018)

    2018

  51. [52]

    Popescu, A

    S. Popescu, A. B. Sainz, A. J. Short, and A. Winter, Reference frames which separately store noncommuting conserved quantities, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 090601 (2020)

    2020

  52. [53]

    Hayden, S

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, S. Popescu, and G. Salton, Error correction of quantum reference frame information, PRX Quantum 2, 010326 (2021)

    2021

  53. [54]

    Zhou, Z.-W

    S. Zhou, Z.-W. Liu, and L. Jiang, New perspectives on covariant quantum error correction, Quantum5, 521 (2021)

    2021

  54. [55]

    Y. Yang, Y. Mo, J. M. Renes, G. Chiribella, and M. P. Woods, Optimal universal quantum error correction via bounded reference frames, Phys. Rev. Research4, 023107 (2022)

    2022

  55. [56]

    Kong and Z.-W

    L. Kong and Z.-W. Liu, Near-optimal covariant quantum error-correcting codes from random unitaries with symmetries, PRX Quantum3, 020314 (2022)

    2022

  56. [57]

    Marvian, Restrictions on realizable unitary operations imposed by symmetry and locality, Nat

    I. Marvian, Restrictions on realizable unitary operations imposed by symmetry and locality, Nat. Phys.18, 283 (2022)

    2022

  57. [58]

    Liu and S

    Z.-W. Liu and S. Zhou, Approximate symmetries and quantum error correction, npj Quantum Inf.9, 119 (2023)

    2023

  58. [59]

    Marvian, H

    I. Marvian, H. Liu, and A. Hulse, Rotationally invariant circuits: Universality with the exchange interaction and two ancilla qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 130201 (2024)

    2024

  59. [60]

    They can be relevant for ultimate optimizations, for example in reference-frame transmission [27] or squeezing estimation [58]

    Although this issue does not arise in the present analysis, equivalent irreducible components cannot in general be ignored. They can be relevant for ultimate optimizations, for example in reference-frame transmission [27] or squeezing estimation [58]

  60. [61]

    Chiribella, G

    G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and M. F. Sacchi, Optimal estimation of squeezing, Phys. Rev. A73, 062103 (2006)

    2006

  61. [62]

    Perelomov,Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986)

    A. Perelomov,Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986)

    1986

  62. [63]

    F. T. Arecchi, E. Courtens, R. Gilmore, and H. Thomas, Atomic coherent states in quantum optics, Phys. Rev. A6, 2211 (1972)

    1972

  63. [64]

    A. R. Edmonds,Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1957)

    1957

  64. [65]

    Szegő,Orthogonal Polynomials, 4th ed

    G. Szegő,Orthogonal Polynomials, 4th ed. (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1975)

    1975

  65. [66]

    Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators(Springer, Berlin, 1995)

    T. Kato,Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators(Springer, Berlin, 1995)

    1995

  66. [67]

    Chiribella, G

    G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and M. F. Sacchi, Optimal estimation of group transformations using entanglement, Phys. Rev. A72, 042338 (2005)

    2005

  67. [68]

    G. N. Watson,A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1944)

    1944

  68. [69]

    F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, eds.,NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    2010

  69. [70]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 8th ed., edited by D. Zwillinger and V. Moll (Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2014)

    2014