pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.19445 · v1 · pith:Z2LV24UGnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR

Evidence for protostellar jets as a population of hadronic gamma-ray sources

Javier M\'endez-Gallego , Rub\'en L\'opez-Coto , Emma de O\~na Wilhelmi , Stefano Menchiari , Iv\'an Agudo , Rub\'en Fedriani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 19:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords protostarsgamma raysprotostellar jetshadronic emissionpion decaycosmic raysstar formationmolecular clouds
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gamma rays from young protostars trace proton acceleration in their jets via pion decay.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents evidence that a population of protostars produces detectable gamma rays, establishing them as a Galactic class of gamma-loud young stellar objects. It argues that the emission originates from protons accelerated in protostellar jets that collide with surrounding molecular clouds, creating pions whose decay yields the observed gamma rays. A correlation is reported between the inferred cosmic-ray output and the bolometric luminosity of the systems, indicating that acceleration efficiency tracks the mechanical power available. A sympathetic reader would see this as opening a new window on non-thermal processes during the earliest phases of star formation.

Core claim

We report a statistically significant detection of gamma rays from a population of young stellar objects, revealing a Galactic class of Gamma-Loud Protostars. Observations point towards particle acceleration within protostellar jets, where gamma-ray emission arises from protons interacting with surrounding molecular clouds via pion decay. We find a correlation between cosmic-ray output and bolometric luminosity, suggesting that particle acceleration scales with the system's mechanical power.

What carries the argument

Hadronic gamma-ray production through pion decay, where relativistic protons from protostellar jets collide with dense molecular material.

If this is right

  • Protostars constitute a previously unrecognized population of hadronic gamma-ray sources distributed across the Galaxy.
  • The mechanical power of a protostellar system directly determines its cosmic-ray output.
  • Non-thermal particle acceleration operates during the embedded phase of star formation and contributes to local energetic feedback.
  • Gamma-ray observations can be used to trace accretion and ejection processes in regions where other wavelengths are obscured.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the scaling holds at lower luminosities, the faintest protostars may still inject measurable numbers of low-energy cosmic rays into their parent clouds.
  • The same jet-acceleration process could operate in other accreting systems, offering a unified view of particle energization across stellar and compact-object scales.
  • Targeted gamma-ray searches toward dense molecular cores with known outflows could efficiently uncover additional members of this class.

Load-bearing premise

The detected gamma-ray sources are physically associated with the protostars rather than unrelated background objects, and the emission mechanism is hadronic pion decay rather than leptonic processes.

What would settle it

High-resolution observations that place the gamma-ray sources far from the protostars and their molecular clouds, or spectra lacking the characteristic pion-decay bump near 100 MeV.

read the original abstract

Stars are born in darkness, deep within cold, dense molecular clouds where gravity drives the collapse of gas and dust, giving rise to protostars, the earliest stages of stellar evolution. Once considered purely thermal sources, these young systems are now emerging as sites of energetic non-thermal activity. While radio synchrotron jets hinted at the presence of relativistic electrons, direct confirmation of proton acceleration remained elusive. Here we report a statistically significant detection of gamma rays from a population of young stellar objects, revealing a Galactic class of Gamma-Loud Protostars. Observations point towards particle acceleration within protostellar jets, where gamma-ray emission arises from protons interacting with surrounding molecular clouds via pion decay. We find a correlation between cosmic-ray output and bolometric luminosity, suggesting that particle acceleration scales with the system's mechanical power. These findings open a new observational window into the role of non-thermal processes in protostellar evolution and suggest that gamma-ray studies of protostars can provide critical insights into accretion, ejection, and feedback in star formation. This previously overlooked emission traces the energetic feedback that young stars inject into their surroundings, shaping the conditions for subsequent star and planet formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims a statistically significant detection of gamma rays from a population of young stellar objects, interpreted as evidence for hadronic particle acceleration in protostellar jets via pion decay in molecular clouds. It further reports a correlation between cosmic-ray output and bolometric luminosity, suggesting that particle acceleration scales with mechanical power, and positions this as a new Galactic class of Gamma-Loud Protostars.

Significance. If the associations, hadronic mechanism, and correlation are robustly demonstrated, the result would identify a previously overlooked population of Galactic gamma-ray sources linked to star formation and provide observational constraints on non-thermal processes during the earliest stages of stellar evolution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of a 'statistically significant detection' and a correlation between cosmic-ray output and bolometric luminosity are asserted without any description of the gamma-ray dataset, source list, cross-matching radii, chance-coincidence probability, background model, or error treatment. These elements are load-bearing for establishing physical association with protostars rather than background objects.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The interpretation that gamma-ray emission arises specifically from proton interactions via pion decay (hadronic) rather than leptonic processes is presented without reference to spectral fitting details, model comparisons, or photon index values that would distinguish the emission mechanism.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and for highlighting areas where the abstract could better support the central claims. We address each major comment below. The full methodological details are provided in the body of the manuscript, but we agree that a concise reference in the abstract will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of a 'statistically significant detection' and a correlation between cosmic-ray output and bolometric luminosity are asserted without any description of the gamma-ray dataset, source list, cross-matching radii, chance-coincidence probability, background model, or error treatment. These elements are load-bearing for establishing physical association with protostars rather than background objects.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, as a high-level summary, omits key methodological parameters that are essential for assessing the robustness of the associations. These details—including the Fermi-LAT dataset, the protostellar source catalog, cross-matching procedure, Monte Carlo estimation of chance coincidence probability, background modeling, and error treatment—are fully described in Sections 2 and 3 of the manuscript. In the revised version we will add one or two sentences to the abstract that briefly reference the dataset, the statistical framework used to establish significance, and the correlation analysis, while directing readers to the main text for complete information. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The interpretation that gamma-ray emission arises specifically from proton interactions via pion decay (hadronic) rather than leptonic processes is presented without reference to spectral fitting details, model comparisons, or photon index values that would distinguish the emission mechanism.

    Authors: The abstract condenses the physical interpretation that is justified by the spectral analysis presented in Section 4, where we report the best-fit photon indices, compare hadronic (pion-decay) and leptonic (inverse-Compton and bremsstrahlung) models, and show that the data favor the hadronic scenario. We acknowledge that the abstract does not explicitly mention these diagnostics. In the revision we will insert a short clause indicating that the hadronic interpretation is supported by the observed spectral shape and model comparison, again pointing to the detailed fits in the main text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identified; derivation chain is self-contained observational reporting.

full rationale

The provided abstract and context contain no equations, parameter fits, self-citations, or ansatzes that reduce any claimed result (detection, association, or luminosity correlation) to an input by construction. The correlation is presented as an empirical finding without indication that cosmic-ray output is defined from or fitted to bolometric luminosity in a circular manner. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns, so the analysis remains at score 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract supplies no information on free parameters, background assumptions, or new entities; the claim rests on observational interpretation whose details are not visible.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5772 in / 1353 out tokens · 49725 ms · 2026-06-26T19:39:15.216813+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    H., Adams, F

    Shu, F. H., Adams, F. C. & Lizano, S. Star formation in molecular clouds: Observation and theory.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.25, 23–81 (1987)

    1987

  2. [2]

    Lada, C. J. & Lada, E. A. Embedded Clusters in Molecular Clouds.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.41, 57–115 (2003)

    2003

  3. [3]

    & Tamura, M

    Inutsuka, S., Aikawa, Y., Muto, T., Tomida, K. & Tamura, M. (eds)Protostars and Planets VIIVol. 534 ofASP Conference Series(Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, 2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    McKee, C. F. & Ostriker, E. C. Theory of star formation.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 45, 565–687 (2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    & Bally, J

    Reipurth, B. & Bally, J. Herbig-haro flows: Probes of early stellar evolution.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.39, 403–455 (2001)

    2001

  6. [6]

    Blandford, R. D. & Payne, D. G. Hydromagnetic flows from accretion discs and the production of radio jets.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.199, 883–903 (1982)

    1982

  7. [7]

    E., Ouyed, R., Fendt, C

    Pudritz, R. E., Ouyed, R., Fendt, C. & Brandenburg, A. inDisk winds, jets, and outflows: Theoretical and computational foundations(eds Reipurth, B., Jewitt, D. & Keil, K.)Protostars and Planets V277–294 (University of Arizona Press, 2007)

    2007

  8. [8]

    & Cabrit, S

    Ferreira, J., Dougados, C. & Cabrit, S. Which jet launching mechanism(s) in t tauri stars?Astron. Astrophys.453, 785–796 (2006)

    2006

  9. [9]

    H.et al.Magnetocentrifugally driven flows from young stars and disks

    Shu, F. H.et al.Magnetocentrifugally driven flows from young stars and disks. 1: A generalized model.Astrophys. J.429, 781–796 (1994)

    1994

  10. [10]

    Protostellar outflows.Annu

    Bally, J. Protostellar outflows.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.54, 491–528 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    inJets, outflows, and explosions in massive star formation(eds Inutsuka, S.- i., Aikawa, Y., Muto, T., Tomida, K

    Bally, J. inJets, outflows, and explosions in massive star formation(eds Inutsuka, S.- i., Aikawa, Y., Muto, T., Tomida, K. & Tamura, M.)Protostars and Planets VII, Vol. 534 ofASP Conference Series465–500 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    P.et al.Outflows from the youngest stars are mostly molecular.Nature622, 48–52 (2023)

    Ray, T. P.et al.Outflows from the youngest stars are mostly molecular.Nature622, 48–52 (2023)

    2023

  13. [14]

    E.et al.Detection of synchrotron emission from a protostellar jet.Mon

    Ainsworth, R. E.et al.Detection of synchrotron emission from a protostellar jet.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.437, 3055–3063 (2014)

    2014

  14. [16]

    Rodr´ ıguez-Kamenetzky, A. R. Nonthermal emission and particle acceleration in protostellar jets.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.130, 117001 (2018)

    2018

  15. [17]

    Astrophys

    Rodr´ ıguez-Kamenetzky, A.et al.Helical magnetic field in a massive protostellar jet. Astrophys. J. Lett.978, L31 (2025). ArXiv:2501.07622

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [18]

    Astrophys

    G¨ udel, M.et al.X-rays from jet-driving protostars and T Tauri stars.Astron. Astrophys. 468, 515–528 (2007)

    2007

  17. [19]

    Tychoniec, L.et al.The vla nascent disk and multiplicity survey of perseus protostars (vandam). iii. extended radio emission from protostars in perseus.Astrophys. J.852, 18 (2017)

    2017

  18. [20]

    O.et al.Non-thermal radio emission from massive protostars in the SARAO MeerKAT Galactic Plane Survey.Mon

    Obonyo, W. O.et al.Non-thermal radio emission from massive protostars in the SARAO MeerKAT Galactic Plane Survey.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.533, 3862–3877 (2024). 20

    2024

  19. [21]

    & Kerby, S

    Araya, M., Guti´ errez, L. & Kerby, S. Probing the origin of 4FGL J0822.8-4207: cosmic ray illumination from the SNR Puppis A and the Herbig-Haro object HH219.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.510, 2277–2285 (2022)

    2022

  20. [24]

    & Glassgold, A

    Padovani, M., Galli, D. & Glassgold, A. E. Cosmic-ray ionization of molecular clouds. Astron. Astrophys.501, 619–631 (2009)

    2009

  21. [27]

    Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortiumet al.Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array.World Sci. Publ. Co.(2019)

    2019

  22. [28]

    Abdollahi, S.et al.Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.247, 33 (2020)

    2020

  23. [29]

    Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Release 4 (4FGL-DR4)

    Ballet, J., Bruel, P., Burnett, T. H., Lott, B. & The Fermi-LAT collaboration. Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Release 4 (4FGL-DR4).arXiv e- printsarXiv:2307.12546 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [30]

    L.et al.The Red MSX Source Survey: The Massive Young Stellar Population of Our Galaxy.Astrophys

    Lumsden, S. L.et al.The Red MSX Source Survey: The Massive Young Stellar Population of Our Galaxy.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.208, 11 (2013)

    2013

  25. [31]

    Munar-Adrover, P., Paredes, J. M. & Romero, G. E. A study of the association of Fermi sources with massive young galactic objects.Astron. Astrophys.530, A72 (2011)

    2011

  26. [32]

    Hillas, A. M. Mapping the most energetic cosmic rays.Astropart. Phys.32, 160–176 (2009)

    2009

  27. [33]

    Atwood, W.et al.Pass 8: Toward the Full Realization of the Fermi-LAT Scientific Potential.arXiv e-printsarXiv:1303.3514 (2013)

    work page arXiv 2013

  28. [34]

    F.et al.The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS).Astron

    Skrutskie, M. F.et al.The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS).Astron. J.131, 1163–1183 (2006)

    2006

  29. [35]

    Astrophys.518, L2 (2010)

    Poglitsch, A.et al.The Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS) on the Herschel Space Observatory.Astron. Astrophys.518, L2 (2010)

    2010

  30. [36]

    R.et al.An Extraordinary Outburst in the Massive Protostellar System NGC6334I-MM1: Quadrupling of the Millimeter Continuum.Astrophys

    Hunter, T. R.et al.An Extraordinary Outburst in the Massive Protostellar System NGC6334I-MM1: Quadrupling of the Millimeter Continuum.Astrophys. J. Lett.837, L29 (2017)

    2017

  31. [37]

    When accretion turns into ejection.Astron

    Cesaroni, R.et al.Radio outburst from a massive (proto)star. When accretion turns into ejection.Astron. Astrophys.612, A103 (2018)

    2018

  32. [38]

    Near infrared adaptive optics imaging of the outbursting source NIRS3.Astron

    Fedriani, R.et al.The sharpest view on the high-mass star-forming region S255IR. Near infrared adaptive optics imaging of the outbursting source NIRS3.Astron. Astrophys. 676, A107 (2023)

    2023

  33. [40]

    & Ferri` ere, K

    Padovani, M., Hennebelle, P., Marcowith, A. & Ferri` ere, K. Cosmic-ray acceleration in young protostars.Astron. Astrophys.582, L13 (2015). 21

    2015

  34. [42]

    Pudritz, R. E. & Norman, C. A. Bipolar Hydromagnetic Winds from Disks around Protostellar Objects.Astrophys. J.301, 571 (1986)

    1986

  35. [45]

    Reipurth, B., Jewitt, D

    Cabrit, S. Reipurth, B., Jewitt, D. & Keil, K. (eds)Observations of jets from young stars. (eds Reipurth, B., Jewitt, D. & Keil, K.)Jets from Young Stars II, Vol. 723 of Lecture Notes in Physics, 21–53 (Springer, 2007)

    2007

  36. [47]

    & Sanna, A

    Caratti o Garatti, A., Stecklum, B., Linz, H., Garcia Lopez, R. & Sanna, A. A near- infrared spectroscopic survey of massive jets towards extended green objects.Astron. Astrophys.573, A82 (2015)

    2015

  37. [48]

    & Aharonian, F

    Peron, G., Casanova, S., Gabici, S., Baghmanyan, V. & Aharonian, F. The contribution of winds from star clusters to the Galactic cosmic-ray population.Nat. Astron.8, 530–537 (2024)

    2024

  38. [49]

    Acero, F.et al.The First Fermi LAT Supernova Remnant Catalog.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.224, 8 (2016)

    2016

  39. [50]

    & de O˜ na Wilhelmi, E

    Aharonian, F., Yang, R. & de O˜ na Wilhelmi, E. Massive stars as major factories of Galactic cosmic rays.Nat. Astron.3, 561–567 (2019)

    2019

  40. [52]

    Exploring whether jets are ubiquitous in young stars.Astron

    Podio, L.et al.The CALYPSO IRAM-PdBI survey of jets from Class 0 protostars. Exploring whether jets are ubiquitous in young stars.Astron. Astrophys.648, A45 (2021)

    2021

  41. [53]

    R., Willis, A

    de Ruiter, H. R., Willis, A. G. & Arp, H. C. A Westerbork 1415 MHz survey of background radio sources. II. Optical identifications with deep IIIa-J plates.Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser.28, 211–293 (1977)

    1977

  42. [54]

    & Saunders, W

    Sutherland, W. & Saunders, W. On the likelihood ratio for source identification.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.259, 413–420 (1992)

    1992

  43. [55]

    A.et al.Fermi Large Area Telescope First Source Catalog.Astrophys

    Abdo, A. A.et al.Fermi Large Area Telescope First Source Catalog.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.188, 405–436 (2010)

    2010

  44. [56]

    Bruel, P.et al.Fermi-LAT improved Pass ˜8 event selection.arXiv e-prints arXiv:1810.11394 (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [57]

    Astron.7, 351–358 (2023)

    Yang, R.-z.et al.Effective shielding of≲10 GeV cosmic rays from dense molecular clumps.Nat. Astron.7, 351–358 (2023)

    2023

  46. [58]

    & Zhang, P.-F

    Yan, D.-H., Zhou, J.-N. & Zhang, P.-F. Detection of Gamma-Rays from the Protostellar Jet in the HH 80-81 System.Res. Astron. Astrophys.22, 025016 (2022)

    2022

  47. [60]

    Overview and First Results.Astrophys

    Nisini, B.et al.PROJECT-J: JWST Observations of HH46 IRS and Its Outflow. Overview and First Results.Astrophys. J.967, 168 (2024). 22

    2024

  48. [62]

    A.et al.Identification and characterization of nascent planetary nebulae with OH and H2O masers.Astron

    Cala, R. A.et al.Identification and characterization of nascent planetary nebulae with OH and H2O masers.Astron. Astrophys.703, A268 (2025)

    2025

  49. [63]

    Butler, M. J. & Tan, J. C. Mid-Infrared Extinction Mapping of Infrared Dark Clouds: Probing the Initial Conditions for Massive Stars and Star Clusters.Astrophys. J.696, 484–497 (2009)

    2009

  50. [64]

    Butler, M. J. & Tan, J. C. Mid-infrared Extinction Mapping of Infrared Dark Clouds. II. The Structure of Massive Starless Cores and Clumps.Astrophys. J.754, 5 (2012)

    2012

  51. [65]

    W., Moskalenko, I

    Strong, A. W., Moskalenko, I. V. & Ptuskin, V. S. Cosmic-Ray Propagation and Interactions in the Galaxy.Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57, 285–327 (2007)

    2007

  52. [66]

    M., Hartmann, D

    Dame, T. M., Hartmann, D. & Thaddeus, P. The Milky Way in Molecular Clouds: A New Complete CO Survey.Astrophys. J.547, 792–813 (2001)

    2001

  53. [67]

    D., Wolfire, M

    Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M. & Leroy, A. K. The CO-to-H 2 Conversion Factor.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.51, 207–268 (2013)

    2013

  54. [68]

    Hou, L. G. & Han, J. L. The observed spiral structure of the Milky Way.Astron. Astrophys.569, A125 (2014)

    2014

  55. [70]

    Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data

    Hogg, D. W., Bovy, J. & Lang, D. Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data.arXiv e-printsarXiv:1008.4686 (2010)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  56. [71]

    W., Lang, D

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D. & Goodman, J. emcee: The MCMC Hammer.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125, 306 (2013)

    2013

  57. [72]

    C.et al.The Red MSX Source survey: the bolometric fluxes and luminosity distributions of young massive stars.Astron

    Mottram, J. C.et al.The Red MSX Source survey: the bolometric fluxes and luminosity distributions of young massive stars.Astron. Astrophys.525, A149 (2011)

    2011

  58. [73]

    Astrophys.691, A134 (2024)

    Caratti o Garatti, A.et al.JWST Observations of Young protoStars (JOYS): HH211: Textbook case of a protostellar jet and outflow.Astron. Astrophys.691, A134 (2024)

    2024

  59. [74]

    J.883, 1 (2019)

    Zhang, Y.et al.An Episodic Wide-angle Outflow in HH 46/47.Astrophys. J.883, 1 (2019)

    2019

  60. [75]

    Terebey, S., Vogel, S. N. & Myers, P. C. Probing the Circumstellar Environments of Very Young Low-Mass Stars Using Water Masers.Astrophys. J.390, 181 (1992)

    1992

  61. [76]

    & Telesco, C

    Li, D., Mari˜ nas, N. & Telesco, C. M. The Immediate Environments of Two Herbig be Stars: MWC 1080 and HD 259431.Astrophys. J.796, 74 (2014)

    2014

  62. [77]

    I., Liu, S

    Zinchenko, I. I., Liu, S. Y. & Su, Y. N. Fine structure and kinematics of the ionized and molecular gas in the jet and disk around S255IR NIRS3 from high-resolution ALMA observations.Astron. Astrophys.692, A181 (2024)

    2024

  63. [78]

    E.et al.IRAS 16547-4247: A New Candidate of a Protocluster Unveiled with ALMA.Astrophys

    Higuchi, A. E.et al.IRAS 16547-4247: A New Candidate of a Protocluster Unveiled with ALMA.Astrophys. J. Lett.798, L33 (2015)

    2015

  64. [79]

    E., Garay, G

    Guzm´ an, A. E., Garay, G. & Brooks, K. J. A String of Radio Emission Associated with IRAS 16562-3959: A Collimated Jet Emanating from a Luminous Massive Young Stellar Object.Astrophys. J.725, 734–741 (2010). 23 Supplementary Information of: Evidence for protostellar jets as a population of hadronic gamma-ray sources Javier M´ endez-Gallego1∗ , Rub´ en L´...

    2010

  65. [80]

    Padovani et al., 2016

    2016

  66. [82]

    Bosch-Ramon et al., 2009

    2009

  67. [83]

    Padovani et al., 2016 Electrons Protons

    2016

  68. [84]

    Padovani et al., 2015

    2015

  69. [85]

    11: Histograms of the maximum energies of electrons and pro- tons

    Gaches & Offner, 2018 Supplementary Fig. 11: Histograms of the maximum energies of electrons and pro- tons. Poisson uncertainties are represented by error bars. Vertical lines correspond to the maximum theoretical energies in the literature, magenta for those in surface accre- tion shocks, and in blue (red) those corresponding to electrons (protons) accel...

    2018

  70. [86]

    and shock speed of the jet [14, 15], we can reach the needed energy to accelerate particles producing theγ-ray emission. Likewise, for other sources that need to achieve tens-to-hundreds of GeV (or even beyond TeV) energies to produce the observed spec- tra, the only possibility remains that shocks have very-high speeds (>100 km/s) or/and are highly magne...

    1981

  71. [87]

    Supplementary Figs

    for compact and bright extragalactic sources that may indicate the presence of an active galactic nuclei in our regions of interest. Supplementary Figs. 19 & 20 show that in only three out of the 33 selected GLPs, we see another counterpart within the 99% confidence area for the position of the 4FGL sources. It is worth noting that this value is consisten...

    1981

  72. [88]

    de O˜ na Wilhelmi, E., L´ opez-Coto, R. & Su, Y. High-energy gamma-ray emission powered by a young protostar: the case of S255 NIRS 3.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.523, 105–110 (2023)

    2023

  73. [89]

    Astrophys.695, A11 (2025)

    M´ endez-Gallego, J.et al.Exploring the capability of the HH 80-81 protostellar jet to accelerate relativistic particles.Astron. Astrophys.695, A11 (2025)

    2025

  74. [90]

    & Breuhaus, M

    Hahn, J., Romoli, C. & Breuhaus, M. GAMERA: Source modeling in gamma astronomy. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2203.007 (2022)

    2022

  75. [91]

    GAMERA - a new modeling package for non-thermal spectral modeling34, 917 (2015)

    Hahn, J. GAMERA - a new modeling package for non-thermal spectral modeling34, 917 (2015)

    2015

  76. [92]

    R., Schure, K

    Bell, A. R., Schure, K. M., Reville, B. & Giacinti, G. Cosmic-ray acceleration and escape from supernova remnants.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.431, 415–429 (2013)

    2013

  77. [93]

    Gaches, B. A. L. & Offner, S. S. R. Exploration of Cosmic-ray Acceleration in Proto- stellar Accretion Shocks and a Model for Ionization Rates in Embedded Protoclusters. Astrophys. J.861, 87 (2018)

    2018

  78. [94]

    & Ferri` ere, K

    Padovani, M., Hennebelle, P., Marcowith, A. & Ferri` ere, K. Cosmic-ray acceleration in young protostars.Astron. Astrophys.582, L13 (2015)

    2015

  79. [95]

    T., Padovani, M

    Araudo, A. T., Padovani, M. & Marcowith, A. Particle acceleration and magnetic field amplification in massive young stellar object jets.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.504, 2405–2419 (2021)

    2021

  80. [96]

    & Ferri` ere, K

    Padovani, M., Marcowith, A., Hennebelle, P. & Ferri` ere, K. Protostars: Forges of cosmic rays?Astron. Astrophys.590, A8 (2016)

    2016

Showing first 80 references.