pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2307.12546 · v4 · submitted 2023-07-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 1 theorem link

Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Release 4 (4FGL-DR4)

J. Ballet , P. Bruel , T.H. Burnett , B. Lott , The Fermi-LAT collaboration
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 18:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords Fermi LATgamma-ray sourcescatalog4FGLhigh-energy astrophysicssource detectionextended sources
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Fermi-LAT fourth catalog now lists 7194 gamma-ray sources from the first 14 years of observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper releases an updated version of the fourth Fermi Large Area Telescope source catalog that incorporates two additional years of data. It applies the same detection and characterization methods used for the prior 12-year release while adding 546 new point sources and four extended sources. Spectral parameters, light curves, and multi-wavelength associations receive updates across the entire set of sources. A reader would care because the catalog supplies the reference list of high-energy objects that drives follow-up studies in astrophysics and cosmology.

Core claim

The central claim is that the incremental 4FGL-DR4 catalog contains 7194 gamma-ray sources derived from 14 years of Fermi-LAT data between 50 MeV and 1 TeV. The analysis pipeline remains essentially unchanged from the 12-year DR3 release except for minor improvements. Four new extended sources are introduced and two existing ones are modified; fourteen prior sources are removed, ten receive revised positions, and 546 new point sources are added, most near the detection threshold. Spectral fits, light curves, and associations are recomputed for every source.

What carries the argument

The incremental catalog construction pipeline that detects, localizes, and fits spectra of gamma-ray sources in Fermi-LAT sky maps.

If this is right

  • Refined light curves improve identification of transient and variable sources.
  • Addition of 546 sources increases the sample available for population studies of gamma-ray emitters.
  • Updated associations for 32 sources strengthen multi-wavelength counterpart searches.
  • Removal of 14 sources and repositioning of 10 reduce contamination in the catalog.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Longer exposure may shift the classification of sources that sit close to the detection threshold.
  • The larger catalog could tighten constraints on the unresolved component of the diffuse gamma-ray background.
  • Repeated incremental releases may eventually require a full re-derivation of background models once accumulated systematics exceed statistical gains.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the background models and analysis methods calibrated on 12 years of data remain adequate for 14 years without introducing new systematic errors near the detection threshold.

What would settle it

A direct comparison showing that a substantial fraction of sources near threshold have flux or position shifts between the 12-year and 14-year analyses that exceed the quoted statistical uncertainties.

read the original abstract

We present an incremental version (4FGL-DR4, for Data Release 4) of the fourth Fermi-LAT catalog containing 7194 gamma-ray sources. Based on the first 14 years of science data in the energy range from 50 MeV to 1 TeV, it uses the same analysis methods as the 4FGL-DR3 catalog did for 12 years of data, with only a few improvements. The spectral parameters, spectral energy distributions, light curves and associations are updated for all sources. We add four new extended sources and modify two existing ones. Among the 6658 4FGL-DR3 sources, we delete 14 and change the localization of 10, while 32 are newly associated, eleven associations are changed and three associations are discarded. We add 546 point sources, among which 8 are considered identified and 229 have a plausible counterpart at other wavelengths. Most are just above the detection threshold, and 14 are transient sources below the detection threshold that can affect the light curves of nearby sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the 4FGL-DR4 catalog as an incremental update to the 4FGL-DR3, containing 7194 gamma-ray sources derived from the first 14 years of Fermi-LAT data (50 MeV to 1 TeV). It applies essentially the same analysis pipeline as the prior 12-year release with only a few improvements, updating spectral parameters, SEDs, light curves, and associations for all sources while adding 546 new point sources (mostly near threshold), 4 extended sources, deleting 14 sources, repositioning 10, and modifying some associations.

Significance. If the analysis holds, this catalog is a valuable public resource for high-energy astrophysics, extending the temporal baseline for source monitoring and enabling detection of fainter or transient sources. The direct reporting of numerical changes (new, deleted, and repositioned sources) and continuity with prior releases facilitate consistent multi-wavelength studies and population analyses. The use of established methods on public data strengthens reproducibility.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: the statement that the analysis 'uses the same analysis methods as the 4FGL-DR3 catalog did for 12 years of data, with only a few improvements' does not quantify those improvements or demonstrate that the additional two years do not introduce new systematics in detection, localization, or spectral fitting near threshold; this is load-bearing for the reliability of the 546 added sources, most of which are just above threshold.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the total source count from 4FGL-DR3 (6658) is stated only later in the text; including it in the abstract would provide immediate context for the net increase to 7194.
  2. The manuscript should include a short dedicated paragraph or table summarizing the specific improvements to the pipeline (e.g., background model updates or localization refinements) and their measured effect on source properties.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and positive recommendation for minor revision. The catalog update is indeed incremental, and we address the specific concern about the abstract statement below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the statement that the analysis 'uses the same analysis methods as the 4FGL-DR3 catalog did for 12 years of data, with only a few improvements' does not quantify those improvements or demonstrate that the additional two years do not introduce new systematics in detection, localization, or spectral fitting near threshold; this is load-bearing for the reliability of the 546 added sources, most of which are just above threshold.

    Authors: We agree the abstract is too terse on this point. The specific improvements are described in Section 2 of the manuscript and consist of an updated Galactic diffuse emission model (incorporating recent CO and dust maps), refined solar and lunar template handling, and small adjustments to the source detection and localization algorithms to better account for the increased exposure. We will revise the abstract to explicitly list these changes. On potential new systematics from the extra two years, the entire dataset was reprocessed with the identical Pass 8 event selection, instrument response functions, and maximum-likelihood pipeline used for DR3. In the paper we show that spectral parameters and positions for the 6658 common sources agree within uncertainties between the two releases, and the Test Statistic distribution of the 546 new sources follows the expected behavior for sources near threshold with no excess of outliers or anomalous spectral shapes that would indicate systematics. Validation tests (Section 4 and Appendix A) confirm continuity with prior catalogs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Incremental observational catalog shows no significant circularity

full rationale

The paper produces an updated Fermi-LAT source catalog (7194 sources) by reprocessing 14 years of telescope data with the same analysis pipeline and background models as the prior 4FGL-DR3 release, plus minor documented improvements. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; source counts, localizations, spectral fits, and associations are direct empirical outputs from the data. Self-citations to earlier catalog papers exist for methodological continuity but are not invoked to justify any derivation or forbid alternatives. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks (raw LAT photon data) and receives a low score consistent with normal catalog releases.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The catalog rests on standard Fermi-LAT event selection, background modeling, and maximum-likelihood fitting procedures documented in earlier releases. Each source carries its own fitted spectral parameters (flux, index, curvature) that are free parameters determined from the data.

free parameters (1)
  • per-source spectral parameters
    Flux, photon index, and curvature terms are fitted independently for each of the 7194 sources.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Fermi-LAT instrument response functions and diffuse background models remain valid for the extended dataset
    Invoked by the statement that the same analysis methods are used with only a few improvements.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5504 in / 1309 out tokens · 37430 ms · 2026-05-16T18:54:03.849847+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cygnus X-3: A variable petaelectronvolt gamma-ray source

    astro-ph.HE 2025-12 conditional novelty 8.0

    Cygnus X-3 produces variable gamma rays up to 3.7 PeV, consistent with photomeson production in its relativistic jet requiring protons accelerated to tens of PeV.

  2. AGILE detection of transient {\gamma}-ray emission from the region of the supergiant fast X-ray transient source IGR J17354-3255

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AGILE archival data reveal gamma-ray flares from a source matching IGR J17354-3255, with orbital phase correlation supporting physical association and high-energy emission from SFXTs.

  3. A newly born spider system at the core of a radio shell: Evidence for a low-energy supernova

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A radio shell and central source are interpreted as a low-energy supernova remnant hosting a nascent spider pulsar binary formed by an ~8 solar mass star explosion that left the companion bound.

  4. Observations of the Fermi bubbles and the Galactic center excess with the DArk Matter Particle Explorer

    astro-ph.HE 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    DAMPE independently detects the Fermi bubbles at 26 sigma and the Galactic center GeV excess at 7 sigma, with the excess spectrum and morphology matching Fermi-LAT and fitting a 50 GeV dark matter particle annihilatin...

  5. Wolf-Rayet stars as tracers of gamma-ray emission: Isolated stars and stellar clusters/associations

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Wolf-Rayet star clusters show a marginal spatial correlation with unidentified GeV gamma-ray sources, with 11 new cluster associations and 4 isolated WR stars identified as potential emitters from wind termination shocks.

  6. Hadronic Scenario for Galactic PeVatron LHAASO J1912+1014u Supported by Fermi-LAT $\gamma$-ray Data and FUGIN CO Data

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0

    Fermi-LAT and CO data support a hadronic PeVatron scenario for LHAASO J1912+1014u with proton index ~2.2 and total energy (1-5) x 10^49 erg above 1 GeV.

  7. The GMRT High-Resolution Southern Sky Survey for pulsars and transients -- VIII: Orbital Variability and the Evolution of a 1-Day He-WD Millisecond Pulsar J2101-4208

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PSR J2101-4802 is a transitional millisecond pulsar with a ~1-day orbit, 0.15 solar mass He-WD companion, and large orbital period derivative that links redback-like systems to detached binaries.

  8. A sample of short-lived Galactic radio transients from ASKAP VAST

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Six new Galactic radio transients found and classified into two types, proposed to originate from wide-orbit white dwarf binaries.

  9. 4HWC J2029$+$3641: a Pulsar Wind Nebula Powered by PSR J2030$+$3641?

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Off-peak emission from the region of 4HWC J2029+3641 is point-like with a curved spectrum consistent with the outer-gap model of the nearby pulsar PSR J2030+3641 rather than an extended nebula.

  10. Detectability of Polarized Gamma-ray Emission from Blazar Flares with COSI

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    COSI is projected to detect MeV polarization from up to about 6 blazar flares over its two-year mission, mostly flat-spectrum radio quasars, assuming GeV-like flare rates and baseline backgrounds.

  11. Probing the $\gamma$-ray Emission Origin of Two Star-forming Galaxies NGC 2403 and NGC 3424 with the Fermi-LAT

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Reanalysis of Fermi-LAT observations indicates that gamma-ray emission from NGC 2403 and NGC 3424 originates from supernova ejecta and an obscured AGN, respectively, rather than star formation activity.

  12. GeV emission in the region of Vela: a new view of the supernova remnant

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Most cataloged Fermi point sources in the Vela region are spurious; the GeV emission is extended hadronic emission from the supernova remnant.

  13. GeV gamma-ray emission in the field of the shell-type supernova remnant Vela Jr revisited

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Fermi-LAT data show Vela Jr GeV emission matches the H.E.S.S. shell template with index 1.77, and a hybrid model statistically outperforms pure leptonic for the broadband SED.

  14. Source identification for the Swift-BAT 150-month hard X-ray catalog using soft X-ray observations

    astro-ph.HE 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A catalog of 251 soft X-ray counterparts for 250 unassociated Swift-BAT hard X-ray sources classifies 94 as AGN and 58 as galaxies with supporting redshift and limited optical data.

  15. Diffuse gamma-ray emissions around the stellar cluster Berkeley 59

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Extended gamma-ray emission around Berkeley 59 is produced by cosmic rays accelerated in cluster winds colliding with ambient gas.

  16. Status of the KM3NeT real-time analysis framework

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    KM3NeT's real-time framework for low-latency neutrino event reconstruction, external alert follow-up, supernova monitoring, and autonomous cosmic neutrino alerts is now in advanced commissioning.

  17. Deeper analysis of Fermi-LAT unassociated 4FGL J2112.5-3043 for possible identification

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Analysis of an unidentified Fermi gamma-ray source shows inconclusive results with a mild spectral preference for dark matter annihilation over a pulsar origin.

  18. Constraining the synchrotron peak and estimating the VHE brightness of a sample of extreme high synchrotron peak blazars

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    X-ray fitting and SED modeling of HSP and EHSP blazars indicate a subsample may reach detectable TeV fluxes for CTA.

  19. Fermi-LAT 16-year Source List

    astro-ph.HE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    The FL16Y catalog provides 7220 gamma-ray sources with improved localizations from 16 years of Fermi-LAT data while retaining the prior diffuse emission model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 19 Pith papers · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al

    Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2010, Science, 329, 817, doi: 10.1126/science.1192537

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1192537 2010

  2. [2]

    2020, ApJS, 247, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb

    Abdollahi, S., Acero, F., Ackermann, M., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab6bcb 2020

  3. [3]

    2022, ApJS, 260, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6751

    Abdollahi, S., Acero, F., Baldini, L., et al. 2022, ApJS, 260, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6751

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac6751 2022

  4. [4]

    2014, Science, 345, 554, doi: 10.1126/science.1253947

    Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Albert, A., et al. 2014, Science, 345, 554, doi: 10.1126/science.1253947

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1253947 2014

  5. [5]

    2012, ApJ, 750, 3, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/3

    Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Atwood, W. B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 3, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/3

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/1/3 2012

  6. [6]

    2022, ApJS, 263, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9523

    Ajello, M., Baldini, L., Ballet, J., et al. 2022, ApJS, 263, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9523

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9523 2022

  7. [7]

    2021, ApJ, 921, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1d47

    Araya, M. 2021, ApJ, 921, 69, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1d47

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1d47 2021

  8. [8]

    Araya, M., & Herrera, C. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 472, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab101 9 http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat 10 http://galprop.stanford.edu 11 http://healpix.jpl.nasa.gov/ 12 http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/ 13 http://www.star.bristol.ac.uk/∼mbt/topcat/

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab101 2021

  9. [9]

    B., Abdo, A

    Atwood, W. B., Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1071, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/697/2/1071 2009

  10. [10]

    B., Albert, A., Baldini, L., et al

    Atwood, W. B., Albert, A., Baldini, L., et al. 2013, Fermi Symposium proceedings - eConf C121028. https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3514

    work page arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    2021, ApJS, 256, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac072a

    Baldini, L., Ballet, J., Bastieri, D., et al. 2021, ApJS, 256, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac072a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac072a 2021

  12. [12]

    H., Digel, S

    Ballet, J., Burnett, T. H., Digel, S. W., & Lott, B. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2005.11208. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11208

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Bietenholz, M. F. 2006, ApJ, 645, 1180, doi: 10.1086/504584

    work page doi:10.1086/504584 2006

  14. [14]

    2021, A&A, 656, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141553

    Bruel, P. 2021, A&A, 656, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141553

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141553 2021

  15. [15]

    Fermi-LAT improved Pass~8 event selection

    Bruel, P., Burnett, T. H., Digel, S. W., et al. 2018, 8th Fermi Symposium. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.11394

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Corbet, R. H. D., Chomiuk, L., Coley, J. B., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6fe2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6fe2 2022

  17. [17]

    2012, Advances in Space Research, 49, 1313, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.02.004 16 Fermi-LAT collaboration G´ orski, K

    Ferrand, G., & Safi-Harb, S. 2012, Advances in Space Research, 49, 1313, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.02.004 16 Fermi-LAT collaboration G´ orski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759, doi: 10.1086/427976 H. E. S. S. Collaboration, Abdalla, H.,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2012.02.004 2012

  18. [18]

    2018, A&A, 612, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732098

    Abramowski, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732098

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732098 2018

  19. [19]

    F., Lin, T

    Li, J., Torres, D. F., Lin, T. T., et al. 2018, ApJ, 858, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabac9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabac9 2018

  20. [20]

    D., Chomiuk, L., et al

    Li, K.-L., Metzger, B. D., Chomiuk, L., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 697, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0222-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0222-1 2017

  21. [21]

    The ATNF Pulsar Catalogue

    Hobbs, M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1993, doi: 10.1086/428488

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/428488 2005

  22. [22]

    Mayer, M. G. F., Becker, W., Predehl, P., Sasaki, M., & Freyberg, M. 2022, A&A, 661, A31, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142517 NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED). 2019, IPAC, doi: 10.26132/NED1

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142517 2022

  23. [23]

    L., Abdo, A

    Nolan, P. L., Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., et al. 2012, ApJS, 199, 31, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/31

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/31 2012

  24. [24]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6e4

    Paiano, S., Falomo, R., Treves, A., Franceschini, A., & Scarpa, R. 2019, ApJ, 871, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6e4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6e4 2019

  25. [25]

    2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 497, 94, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1840

    Paiano, S., Falomo, R., Treves, A., & Scarpa, R. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 497, 94, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1840

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1840 2020

  26. [26]

    S., Saikia, D

    Paliya, V. S., Saikia, D. J., & Stalin, C. S. 2023, MNRAS, 520, L33, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slac165

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slac165 2023

  27. [27]

    A., Jóhannesson, G., & Moskalenko, I

    Porter, T. A., J´ ohannesson, G., & Moskalenko, I. V. 2017, ApJ, 846, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa844d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa844d 2017

  28. [28]

    2023, AJ, 165, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca1be

    Marchesi, S., & Ajello, M. 2023, AJ, 165, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca1be

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aca1be 2023

  29. [29]

    A., Abdollahi, S., Ajello, M., et al

    Smith, D. A., Abdollahi, S., Ajello, M., et al. 2023, ApJS (accepted). https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.11132

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    V., Li, K.-L., Lopes de Oliveira, R., et al

    Sokolovsky, K. V., Li, K.-L., Lopes de Oliveira, R., et al. 2022a, MNRAS, 514, 2239, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1440 —. 2022b, MNRAS, 514, 2239, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1440

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1440

  31. [31]

    J., Strader, J., Aydi, E., et al

    Swihart, S. J., Strader, J., Aydi, E., et al. 2022a, ApJ, 926, 201, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4ae4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4ae4

  32. [32]

    J., Strader, J., Chomiuk, L., et al

    Swihart, S. J., Strader, J., Chomiuk, L., et al. 2022b, ApJ, 941, 199, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca2ac

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca2ac

  33. [33]

    Taylor, M. B. 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 347, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, ed. P. Shopbell, M. Britton, & R. Ebert, 29

    work page 2005

  34. [34]

    2021, A&A, 656, A139, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141978

    Cusumano, G. 2021, A&A, 656, A139, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141978

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141978 2021

  35. [35]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 9–22, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000332

    Wenger, M., Ochsenbein, F., Egret, D., et al. 2000, A&AS, 143, 9, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000332

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/aas:2000332 2000