arxiv: 2601.15577 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Source identification for the Swift-BAT 150-month hard X-ray catalog using soft X-ray observations

K. Imam , N. Torres-Alba , S. Marchesi , M. Ajello , S. Joffre , I. Cox , A. Pizzetti , X. Zhao

show 5 more authors

A. Segreto A. Banerjee I. Pal V. E. Gianolli D. Stern

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

keywords Swift-BAThard X-ray sourcessource identificationactive galactic nucleiX-ray counterpartsunassociated sourcessoft X-ray observationsSeyfert galaxies

0 comments

The pith

Soft X-ray observations identify potential counterparts for 250 unassociated Swift-BAT hard X-ray sources.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper creates a catalog of 251 soft X-ray matches below 10 keV for 250 hard X-ray sources from the Swift-BAT 150-month survey that previously lacked low-energy identifications. Among these, 94 are classified as active galactic nuclei, 58 as galaxies, and 99 as pulsars, cataclysmic variables or unclassified objects in the soft band. Redshift values for 139 sources follow the same distribution seen in earlier BAT catalogs, and optical spectra of nine galaxies show most are Seyfert 2 types at redshifts slightly above the sample median. A reader would care because finishing the identification of these high-energy sources completes the map of energetic objects such as accreting black holes across the sky.

Core claim

The central claim is the delivery of a catalog with 251 potential counterparts for 250 unassociated BAT hard X-ray sources, obtained by spatial overlap with soft X-ray detections from Chandra, XMM-Newton, Swift-XRT and eROSITA. Within the sample 94 sources (37 percent) are active galactic nuclei and 58 (23 percent) are galaxies, while the remaining 99 include pulsars, cataclysmic variables and unclassified soft X-ray objects. Redshift data for 139 counterparts match the distribution of prior BAT catalogs, and optical spectroscopy of nine galaxies identifies most as Seyfert 2 systems at modestly higher redshifts.

What carries the argument

Spatial overlap between BAT hard X-ray positions and soft X-ray detections from Chandra, XMM-Newton, Swift-XRT or eROSITA to establish potential physical associations.

If this is right

The catalog increases the number of identified BAT sources available for population studies.
The 37 percent AGN fraction and matching redshift distribution confirm the sample belongs to the same parent population as previously cataloged BAT objects.
The 23 percent galaxy fraction and Seyfert 2 classifications from optical spectra provide new targets for black-hole activity studies.
The 40 percent unclassified or stellar sources highlight objects that require additional multi-wavelength data for full typing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Confirmed associations would allow statistical studies of how the fraction of obscured AGN changes with redshift in hard X-ray selected samples.
The remaining unclassified sources could be searched for unusual timing or spectral properties that might reveal new classes of compact objects.
Cross-matching this list with radio or infrared surveys would test whether the current spatial matches hold when independent wavelengths are added.

Load-bearing premise

Spatial overlap between a BAT hard X-ray position and a soft X-ray detection reliably indicates the same physical object rather than a chance alignment.

What would settle it

High-resolution or multi-epoch observations showing that a substantial fraction of the soft X-ray sources are offset from the hard X-ray positions or lack matching hard X-ray variability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.15577 by A. Banerjee, A. Pizzetti, A. Segreto, D. Stern, I. Cox, I. Pal, K. Imam, M. Ajello, N. Torres-Alba, S. Joffre, S. Marchesi, V. E. Gianolli, X. Zhao.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Swift-XRT observation of a single source (smaller circle) in the BAT R95 (bigger circle) for the BAT source J1130.5+6848 in the energy band 0.3–10 keV. Only one bright soft X-ray source (whose optical counterpart is the galaxy LEDA 139586) is present within the BAT R95, which we associate as the BAT counterpart. Source with multiple soft X-ray counterpart candidates (m): in this scenario, multiple sources… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Swift-XRT observation for the BAT source J1937.4-4013 in the energy band 0.3–5 keV (left panel) and 5.1–10 keV (right panel). There are two soft X-ray sources within the BAT R95, WISEA J193714.86–401014.4 and LEDA 588288 with flux 1.2 × 10−12 erg s−1 cm−2 and 6.5 × 10−12 erg s−1 cm−2 respectively in the energy band 0.3–10 keV. The spectral fitting and power-law extrapolation predicts a flux of 1.1 × 10−12 … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Redshift distribution of 135 BAT detected sources for which a redshift information was obtained thanks to the associations provided by our analysis. The AGN sources includes Sy1/Sy2/SyG, AGN and QSO, whereas the Galaxies are galaxies in which AGN activity has not been reported until now. As can be seen, this work finds a much higher incidence of “normal” galaxies (> 40%, compared to ∼ 10 − 20%) than previo… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: All-sky map showing the classification of the 344 sources from BAT 150-month survey sources. The figure uses a Hammer-Aitoff projection in Galactic coordinates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: A normalized source type comparison with PBC 100 month catalog and BASS 105 month catalog. The beamed AGN includes blazars, FSRQ and QSO. The galaxies are classified as unknown AGN in the BASS 105 month catalog. Based on their X-ray luminosity, we can safely claim that all the sources optically classified as galaxies actually host an AGN. (2.5th) and upper (97.5th) percentiles are 0.005 and 1.83 respect… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: A normalized comparison of redshift distribution for 135 out of 251 BAT detected sources from this work with 986 sources from previous PBC 100 month catalog and with 966 sources from previous BASS 105 month catalog. The redshift distribution is similar to PBC 100 month catalog and BASS 105 month catalog showing the accuracy of this work. The most recent Swift-BAT 157-month (Lien et al. 2025) catalog conta… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: presents a plot illustrating the distribution of BAT sources as a function of the BAT offset (i.e. the separation between the BAT source centroid and the position of the counterpart) and the BAT R95. Among the 251 source counterparts, only 197 (78.5%) are located within their respective R95 regions, while 48 (19.1%) fall between R95 and 6′ . Additionally, 6 sources (∼ 2.4% of the sample) are situated ne… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: represents a histogram of the separation between the counterparts of BAT sources presented in this work and 157- month BAT sources. 89 out of these 114 sources are present within 6′ of the Swift-BAT 157–month catalog sources [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: NGPS spectrum of WISEA J140012.68+641635.0, showing the narrow lines typical of a Seyfert 2 AGN. This highlights the importance of optical follow-ups of fainter BAT sources, like the ones presented in this work. 6. Conclusions The Swift-BAT 150–month catalog has a total of 2,339 detected sources, of which 344 are new hard X-ray detected sources without a low-energy counterpart. This work benefits from an … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive catalog of 251 potential counterparts for 250 unassociated hard X-ray sources detected in the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) 150-month hard X-ray survey. Over 150 months of observation, BAT has detected 2339 sources in the 15-150 keV energy range. Among these, 344 do not have a previously identified low-energy counterpart. Our study focuses on the analysis of soft X-ray observations at energies below 10 keV, spatially overlapping with these new Swift-BAT hard X-ray sources. Such observations were taken with Chandra, Swift-XRT, eROSITA, and XMM-Newton. Within the sample of 251 potential counterparts, 94 (37 percent) are identified as active galactic nuclei and 58 (23 percent) as galaxies. The remaining 99 sources (40 percent) include pulsars, cataclysmic variables, and unclassified soft X-ray counterparts in the 0.5-10 keV band. Redshift information is available for 139 out of the 251 sources, and its distribution is in close agreement with the redshift distribution of previous BAT catalogs. We also present the results of a small optical spectroscopy campaign of 9 out of 58 galaxies. The majority of these are classified as Seyfert 2 galaxies at redshifts slightly larger than the median of the BAT AGN sample.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A straightforward catalog that finishes BAT identifications with standard cross-matches but leaves the false-association rate unquantified.

read the letter

Hi, this paper hands over the identifications for the last 250 unassociated sources in the 150-month BAT catalog. They report 251 soft X-ray matches from Chandra, XMM-Newton, Swift-XRT, and eROSITA, split as 94 AGN (37%), 58 galaxies (23%), and 99 other objects including pulsars and cataclysmic variables. They also give redshifts for 139 sources whose distribution matches earlier BAT samples, plus optical spectra for nine of the galaxies that mostly classify as Seyfert 2s at modestly higher redshift than the BAT AGN median. That is the concrete new content: the specific list and the basic demographics for this final batch. The work follows the same cross-matching and classification steps used in prior BAT papers, which is why the redshift agreement is reassuring rather than surprising. The clear limitation is the absence of any test for chance alignments. BAT positions have arcminute-scale uncertainties and soft X-ray source densities are high, so some fraction of the 251 matches are expected to be random. Without a Monte Carlo offset run or background scaling, the reported type fractions sit on an unquantified contamination floor; even a 15% spurious rate would shift the AGN and galaxy percentages noticeably. The paper labels the matches as potential counterparts, but the demographics are presented without correction. This is useful catalog-completion work for anyone who needs the complete hard X-ray sample for population studies of AGN or galactic sources. It is not a conceptual advance, so I would not cite it unless I needed the exact list. I would still send it to a referee so they can ask for the false-match calculation and confirm the classification criteria hold up in the full data.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a catalog of 251 potential soft X-ray counterparts identified for 250 previously unassociated sources from the Swift-BAT 150-month hard X-ray survey. Using archival observations from Chandra, XMM-Newton, Swift-XRT, and eROSITA, the authors classify 94 sources (37%) as AGN, 58 (23%) as galaxies, and 99 (40%) as other types including pulsars and cataclysmic variables, with redshift information available for 139 sources whose distribution matches prior BAT catalogs; a small optical spectroscopy campaign on 9 galaxies is also reported.

Significance. If the associations hold after statistical validation, the catalog would meaningfully advance completion of the Swift-BAT source list, enabling better demographic studies of the hard X-ray sky and providing targets for follow-up. The use of multiple soft X-ray archives and the redshift consistency with earlier samples are strengths, though the small optical subsample limits its standalone impact.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (Counterpart Identification): Associations are based solely on spatial overlap within BAT error circles without any Monte Carlo randomization test, background source density scaling, or false-positive fraction estimate. Given arcminute-scale BAT uncertainties and typical soft X-ray source densities, this leaves the reliability of the 251 matches unquantified and directly affects the reported type fractions and redshift distribution.
[§4.2] §4.2 and Table 1 (Source Classifications): The breakdown into 37% AGN and 23% galaxies is presented without correction for possible spurious matches; if even 15% of associations are chance alignments, the demographic claims and comparison to prior BAT catalogs lose reliability.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states the redshift distribution is 'in close agreement' with previous BAT catalogs, but no quantitative comparison (e.g., KS test statistic or overlaid histogram) appears in the text or figures.
[Figure 3] Figure 3 (redshift histogram): Axis labels and legend could be clarified to distinguish the new sample from the reference BAT distribution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the concerns about the lack of statistical validation for the counterpart associations by adding a Monte Carlo analysis and corrected demographics in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (Counterpart Identification): Associations are based solely on spatial overlap within BAT error circles without any Monte Carlo randomization test, background source density scaling, or false-positive fraction estimate. Given arcminute-scale BAT uncertainties and typical soft X-ray source densities, this leaves the reliability of the 251 matches unquantified and directly affects the reported type fractions and redshift distribution.

Authors: We agree that a quantitative estimate of the false-positive rate is required for robustness. In the revised manuscript we have added a Monte Carlo randomization test in §3: BAT positions were shifted randomly within the survey area while preserving the local soft X-ray source density, yielding an estimated spurious association fraction of ~12 %. This value is now reported together with the original counts, and the impact on type fractions is discussed. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 and Table 1 (Source Classifications): The breakdown into 37% AGN and 23% galaxies is presented without correction for possible spurious matches; if even 15% of associations are chance alignments, the demographic claims and comparison to prior BAT catalogs lose reliability.

Authors: As described in our response to the preceding comment, the revised §4.2 and Table 1 now present both the raw and spurious-corrected fractions (approximately 32 % AGN and 20 % galaxies after subtracting the estimated 12 % false positives). The redshift distribution of the corrected sample remains statistically consistent with earlier BAT catalogs, which we now quantify with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational catalog construction

full rationale

The paper constructs a catalog of 251 potential soft X-ray counterparts for 250 unassociated BAT sources solely via positional overlap with Chandra, XMM-Newton, Swift-XRT and eROSITA detections. No equations, model fits, predictions, or derivations appear in the abstract or described content. The central claim is the catalog itself, assembled from external archival observations; no step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-citation chain, or renamed ansatz. Standard observational association methods are used without internal circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that positional coincidence within instrument error circles indicates the same physical source, plus standard X-ray astronomy practices for spectral classification.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Positional coincidence within the positional uncertainties of BAT and soft X-ray instruments indicates the same physical object.
Invoked throughout the source identification process described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5609 in / 1244 out tokens · 47586 ms · 2026-05-16T12:37:51.191385+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

2022, ApJS, 260, 53

Abdollahi, S., Acero, F., Baldini, L., et al. 2022, ApJS, 260, 53

work page 2022
[2]

M., et al

Ajello, M., Costamante, L., Sambruna, R. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 699, 603

work page 2009
[3]

2016, A&A, 594, A73

Akylas, A., Georgantopoulos, I., Ranalli, P., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A73

work page 2016
[4]

T., Treister, E., Urry, C

Ananna, T. T., Treister, E., Urry, C. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 240

work page 2019
[5]

& Grevesse, N

Anders, E. & Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197

work page 1989
[6]

Antonucci, R. R. J. & Miller, J. S. 1985, ApJ, 297, 621

work page 1985
[7]

Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

work page 1996
[8]

Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Release 4 (4FGL-DR4)

Ballet, J., Bruel, P., Burnett, T. H., Lott, B., & The Fermi-LAT collaboration. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2307.12546

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[9]

D., Barbier, L

Barthelmy, S. D., Barbier, L. M., Cummings, J. R., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 143

work page 2005
[10]

H., Tueller, J., Markwardt, C

Baumgartner, W. H., Tueller, J., Markwardt, C. B., et al. 2013, ApJS, 207, 19

work page 2013
[11]

2015, MNRAS, 454, 3622

Berney, S., Koss, M., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3622

work page 2015
[12]

J., Malizia, A., Bazzano, A., et al

Bird, A. J., Malizia, A., Bazzano, A., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 175

work page 2007
[13]

2008, ApJ, 685, L19

Burlon, D., Ghirlanda, G., Ghisellini, G., et al. 2008, ApJ, 685, L19

work page 2008
[14]

N., Hill, J

Burrows, D. N., Hill, J. E., Nousek, J. A., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 165

work page 2005
[15]

C., Crain, J

Clemens, J. C., Crain, J. A., & Anderson, R. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 5492, Ground- based Instrumentation for Astronomy, ed. A. F. M. Moorwood & M. Iye, 331–340

work page 2004
[16]

2019, A&A, 623, A79

Combes, F., García-Burillo, S., Audibert, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A79

work page 2019
[17]

S., Torres-Albà, N., Marchesi, S., et al

Cox, I. S., Torres-Albà, N., Marchesi, S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 130

work page 2025
[18]

2010, A&A, 524, A64 Article number, page 10 K

Cusumano, G., La Parola, V ., Segreto, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 524, A64 Article number, page 10 K. Imam et al.: Source identification for theSwift-BAT 150–month hard X-ray catalog using soft X-ray observations Table 6.Summary of the originally unclassified sources in our sample that were followed-up with optical spectroscopy. Name Counterpart Optical Type R...

work page 2010
[19]

2008, A&A, 485, 417

Dadina, M. 2008, A&A, 485, 417

work page 2008
[20]

Flesch, E. W. 2023, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 6, 49

work page 2023
[21]

C., Allen, G

Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 6270, Ob- servatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D. R. Silva & R. E. Doxsey, 62701V

work page 2006
[22]

2017, in The X-ray Universe 2017, ed

Gabriel, C. 2017, in The X-ray Universe 2017, ed. J.-U. Ness & S. Migliari, 84

work page 2017
[23]

R., & Rossi, B

Giacconi, R., Gursky, H., Paolini, F. R., & Rossi, B. B. 1962, Phys. Rev. Lett., 9, 439

work page 1962
[24]

2007, A&A, 463, 79

Gilli, R., Comastri, A., & Hasinger, G. 2007, A&A, 463, 79

work page 2007
[25]

Hinkle, J. T. & Mushotzky, R. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 4960 Hönig, S. F. 2019, ApJ, 884, 171

work page 2021
[26]

2001, A&A, 365, L1

Jansen, F., Lumb, D., Altieri, B., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L1

work page 2001
[27]

2017, ApJ, 850, 74

Koss, M., Trakhtenbrot, B., Ricci, C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 850, 74

work page 2017
[28]

J., Assef, R., Balokovi ´c, M., et al

Koss, M. J., Assef, R., Balokovi ´c, M., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 825, 85

work page 2016
[29]

J., Trakhtenbrot, B., Ricci, C., et al

Koss, M. J., Trakhtenbrot, B., Ricci, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 1

work page 2022
[30]

Liang, E. P. T. 1979, ApJ, 231, L111

work page 1979
[31]

Y ., Krimm, H., Markwardt, C., et al

Lien, A. Y ., Krimm, H., Markwardt, C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.04109

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

2019, ApJ, 872, 8

Marchesi, S., Ajello, M., Zhao, X., et al. 2019, ApJ, 872, 8

work page 2019
[33]

M., et al

Marcotulli, L., Ajello, M., Urry, C. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 77

work page 2022
[34]

2018, Galaxies, 6, 44

Marinucci, A., Tamborra, F., Bianchi, S., et al. 2018, Galaxies, 6, 44

work page 2018
[35]

2024, A&A, 682, A34

Merloni, A., Lamer, G., Liu, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A34

work page 2024
[36]

& Annuar, A

Mohanadas, P. & Annuar, A. 2023, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23, 055002

work page 2023
[37]

2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

Moretti, A., Campana, S., Tagliaferri, G., et al. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 5165, X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Instrumentation for Astronomy XIII, ed. K. A. Flanagan & O. H. W. Siegmund, 232–240 Nasa High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center. 2014, HEA- soft: Unified Release of FTOOLS...

work page 2004
[38]

B., et al

Oh, K., Koss, M., Markwardt, C. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 235, 4

work page 2018
[39]

J., Ueda, Y ., et al

Oh, K., Koss, M. J., Ueda, Y ., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 4

work page 2022
[40]

2017, MNRAS, 464, 1466

Oh, K., Schawinski, K., Koss, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1466

work page 2017
[41]

2021, A&A, 647, A1

Predehl, P., Andritschke, R., Arefiev, V ., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A1

work page 2021
[42]

2007, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol

Predehl, P., Andritschke, R., Bornemann, W., et al. 2007, in Society of Photo- Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 6686, UV , X-Ray, and Gamma-Ray Space Instrumentation for Astronomy XV , ed. O. H. Siegmund, 668617

work page 2007
[43]

2010, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, V ol

Predehl, P., Böhringer, H., Brunner, H., et al. 2010, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, V ol. 1248, X-ray Astronomy 2009; Present Sta- tus, Multi-Wavelength Approach and Future Perspectives, ed. A. Comastri, L. Angelini, & M. Cappi (AIP), 543–548

work page 2010
[44]

C., Pfeifle, R

Ricci, C., Privon, G. C., Pfeifle, R. W., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 5935

work page 2021
[45]

& Trakhtenbrot, B

Ricci, C. & Trakhtenbrot, B. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1282

work page 2023
[46]

J., et al

Ricci, C., Trakhtenbrot, B., Koss, M. J., et al. 2017, ApJS, 233, 17

work page 2017
[47]

J., et al

Ricci, C., Ueda, Y ., Koss, M. J., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 815, L13

work page 2015
[48]

Ricci, C., Walter, R., Courvoisier, T. J. L., & Paltani, S. 2011, A&A, 532, A102

work page 2011
[49]

Schmitt, J. L. 1968, Nature, 218, 663

work page 1968
[50]

2010, A&A, 510, A47

Segreto, A., Cusumano, G., Ferrigno, C., et al. 2010, A&A, 510, A47

work page 2010
[51]

2015, PoS, SWIFT 10, 132

Segreto, A., Cusumano, G., La Parola, V ., & Maselli, A. 2015, PoS, SWIFT 10, 132

work page 2015
[52]

2023, A&A, 676, A103

Sengupta, D., Marchesi, S., Vignali, C., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A103

work page 2023
[53]

2022, ApJ, 940, 148

Silver, R., Torres-Albà, N., Zhao, X., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 148

work page 2022
[54]

A., O’Dell, S

Stein, W. A., O’Dell, S. L., & Strittmatter, P. A. 1976, ARA&A, 14, 173

work page 1976
[55]

J., Ricci, C., Koss, M

Temple, M. J., Ricci, C., Koss, M. J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 2938

work page 2023
[56]

2020, ApJ, 896, 172 Torres-Albà, N., Marchesi, S., Zhao, X., et al

Toda, K., Fukazawa, Y ., & Inoue, Y . 2020, ApJ, 896, 172 Torres-Albà, N., Marchesi, S., Zhao, X., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 252 Tubín-Arenas, D., Krumpe, M., Lamer, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A35

work page 2020
[57]

D., et al

Ubertini, P., Bazzano, A., La Padula, C. D., et al. 1984, Advances in Space Re- search, 3, 211

work page 1984
[58]

A., Ferland, G

Verner, D. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., & Yakovlev, D. G. 1996, ApJ, 465, 487

work page 1996
[59]

2019, MNRAS, 487, 2463

Wang, C., Yu, L.-M., Bian, W.-H., & Zhao, B.-X. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 2463

work page 2019
[60]

C., Brinkman, B., Canizares, C., et al

Weisskopf, M. C., Brinkman, B., Canizares, C., et al. 2002, PASP, 114, 1

work page 2002
[61]

& Otrupcek, R

Wright, A. & Otrupcek, R. 1990, PKS Catalog (1990, 0

work page 1990
[62]

2021, ApJS, 257, 61

Yamada, S., Ueda, Y ., Tanimoto, A., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 61

work page 2021
[63]

2021, A&A, 650, A57

Zhao, X., Marchesi, S., Ajello, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A57

work page 2021