pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.14794 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · hep-ex· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Deeper analysis of Fermi-LAT unassociated 4FGL J2112.5-3043 for possible identification

Federica Giacchino , Cristina Fern\'andez-Su\'arez , Miguel \'A S\'anchez-Conde , M.\'Angeles P\'erez-Garc\'ia , Stefano Ciprini , Dario Gasparrini
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 10:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE hep-exhep-ph
keywords Fermi-LATunidentified sourcesdark matter annihilationpulsarsgamma-ray astronomy4FGL catalogGalactic subhalos
0
0 comments X

The pith

The gamma-ray spectrum of 4FGL J2112.5-3043 shows a preference for dark matter annihilation over a pulsar.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a detailed spectral and spatial analysis of the unidentified Fermi-LAT source 4FGL J2112.5-3043. It determines that the source is point-like, exhibits no variability, and its spectrum is best fit by a subexponential cutoff power-law model. When testing possible origins, the data favor dark matter annihilation into bottom or charm quarks more than a pulsar scenario, although neither is confirmed. This finding positions the source as an interesting target for follow-up observations to identify its true nature. Such identifications help clarify the large number of unassociated sources in gamma-ray catalogs.

Core claim

The results of our spectral and spatial analyses show that the source photon spectrum is better described with a subexponential cutoff power-law spectral model, with no significant flux variability over time, and a morphology consistent with being a point-like source. Although our results are inconclusive and neither confirm a DM origin nor firmly establish an astrophysical nature, we find a spectral preference for the bbar{b} and cbar{c} DM annihilation channels over a pulsar origin.

What carries the argument

Spectral model comparison between a subexponential cutoff power law, pulsar templates, and dark matter annihilation spectra for b bar b and c bar c channels.

If this is right

  • This unID is a particularly intriguing candidate for next multiwavelength observations.
  • The spectrum is inconclusive regarding a DM origin or astrophysical nature.
  • The data show a spectral preference for the bbar b and cbar c DM annihilation channels over a pulsar origin.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dark matter interpretation holds, the source would represent a nearby Galactic subhalo detectable via gamma rays.
  • The absence of any multiwavelength counterpart so far is consistent with an exotic origin rather than a conventional astrophysical object.
  • Similar spectral comparisons could be applied to other unassociated 4FGL sources to search for additional dark matter candidates.

Load-bearing premise

The gamma-ray data accurately represent the source emission and can be compared directly to standard pulsar and dark matter annihilation spectral templates without major unaccounted effects.

What would settle it

Detection of pulsations or a radio or X-ray counterpart at the position of 4FGL J2112.5-3043 would indicate a pulsar and falsify the dark matter preference.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14794 by Cristina Fern\'andez-Su\'arez, Dario Gasparrini, Federica Giacchino, M.\'Angeles P\'erez-Garc\'ia, Miguel \'A S\'anchez-Conde, Stefano Ciprini.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Gamma-ray energy spectrum of our unID 4FGL 2112.5-3043, where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Light Curve of 4FGL 2112.5-3043 in 17 years of LAT data, with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spatial extension log-likelihood profile of 4FGL J2112.5-3043, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral curvature index (β) vs. the peak energy (Epeak) — the so￾called β-plot —, for all pulsars and AGNs present in the 4FGL Fermi point￾source catalog [54]. Green points represent pulsars (“psr”), while orange points refer to AGNs. The blue points correspond to the synthetic WIMP DM data set in ref. [55]. In this plot, 4FGL J2112.5-3043 is represented by a black star and lies in the pulsar/DM overlappi… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The gamma-ray energy spectrum of 4FGL 2112.5-3043, where the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the 4FGL-DR4 point-source catalog of the Large Area Telescope (LAT) onboard NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Observatory (Fermi-LAT), around a third of the sources are still unidentified (unIDs). In this work, we perform a detailed study of one of them, namely 4FGL J2112.5-3043. Only gamma-ray emission has been detected from this unidentified source, with no counterpart observed at any other wavelength as of today. Together with its high detection significance, this makes 4FGL J2112.5-3043 a particularly compelling target for further investigation. The results of our spectral and spatial analyses show that the source photon spectrum is better described with a subexponential cutoff power-law spectral model, with no significant flux variability over time, and a morphology consistent with being a point-like source. We investigate and discuss the characterized emission within the context of both conventional and exotic astrophysics, namely a pulsar origin or potential dark matter (DM) annihilations in a nearby Galactic subhalo. Although our results are inconclusive and neither confirm a DM origin nor firmly establish an astrophysical nature, we find a spectral preference for the $b\bar{b}$ and $c\bar{c}$ DM annihilation channels over a pulsar origin, thus making this unID a particularly intriguing candidate for next multiwavelength observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs a detailed Fermi-LAT analysis of the unassociated source 4FGL J2112.5-3043, reporting a point-like morphology, a subexponential cutoff power-law spectrum, and no significant variability. It compares the spectrum to a pulsar model and to dark matter annihilation templates (b b-bar and c c-bar channels) from standard libraries, finding a spectral preference for the DM channels while describing the overall results as inconclusive and calling for multiwavelength follow-up.

Significance. If the reported spectral preference survives proper model comparison, the source would be a noteworthy target for identifying either an unusual pulsar or a nearby DM subhalo. The analysis employs standard LAT tools for spectrum and morphology, which is appropriate for this class of work, but the strength of the central claim rests on the robustness of the DM-versus-pulsar comparison.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and spectral comparison] Abstract and the section presenting the spectral model comparison: the preference for the b b-bar and c c-bar DM annihilation channels is obtained by scanning the WIMP mass to maximize the likelihood for each channel. This introduces an extra continuous free parameter that is absent from the pulsar model (subexponential cutoff power-law with fixed functional form). The manuscript does not state whether a penalized statistic (AIC, BIC, or a likelihood-ratio test with degrees-of-freedom correction) was applied; without it, the quoted preference cannot be taken as evidence of a genuinely superior description of the data.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract simultaneously states that the results are inconclusive and that a spectral preference exists; a brief quantitative statement of the strength of that preference (e.g., Delta log L or information criterion difference) would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript analyzing the unassociated Fermi-LAT source 4FGL J2112.5-3043. The single major comment raises a valid statistical point about model comparison that we address directly below. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate the suggested penalized statistic and clarify the analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and spectral comparison] Abstract and the section presenting the spectral model comparison: the preference for the b b-bar and c c-bar DM annihilation channels is obtained by scanning the WIMP mass to maximize the likelihood for each channel. This introduces an extra continuous free parameter that is absent from the pulsar model (subexponential cutoff power-law with fixed functional form). The manuscript does not state whether a penalized statistic (AIC, BIC, or a likelihood-ratio test with degrees-of-freedom correction) was applied; without it, the quoted preference cannot be taken as evidence of a genuinely superior description of the data.

    Authors: We agree that directly comparing maximum-likelihood values without penalizing for the additional free parameter (WIMP mass) in the DM templates is not statistically rigorous. The pulsar model uses the standard three free parameters of the subexponential cutoff power-law, while each DM channel optimizes over mass in addition to normalization. In the revised manuscript we have computed the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) for all models. The AIC differences confirm a modest preference for the b b-bar and c c-bar channels, consistent with the original description of the results as inconclusive. We have updated the abstract and the spectral-comparison section to report the AIC values and explicitly describe the model-comparison procedure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper fits a sub-exponential cutoff power-law to the Fermi-LAT spectrum of 4FGL J2112.5-3043 and compares the resulting shape to external pulsar templates and DM annihilation spectra (e.g., PPPC4DMID evaluated at scanned masses). This is a standard model-comparison procedure; the central claim of spectral preference is not reduced by construction to the input data or to any self-citation. No self-definitional steps, fitted quantities renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the abstract or described analysis. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central comparison relies on standard spectral templates for pulsars and DM annihilation that are taken from prior literature without independent derivation here.

free parameters (1)
  • subexponential cutoff power-law parameters
    Fitted to the gamma-ray data to characterize the spectrum.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard pulsar and DM annihilation spectral models accurately represent possible emission mechanisms for this source.
    Invoked when comparing the fitted spectrum to these origins.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5589 in / 1201 out tokens · 31861 ms · 2026-05-10T10:47:12.284554+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gehrels, P

    N. Gehrels, P. Michelson, GLAST: The next gener- ation high-energy gamma-ray astronomy mission, As- tropart. Phys. 11 (1999) 277–282.doi:10.1016/ S0927-6505(99)00066-3

    1999

  2. [2]

    W. B. Atwood, et al., The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission, Astrophys. J. 697 (2009) 1071–1102.arXiv:0902.1089,doi:10. 1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    H., Lott, B., & collaboration, T

    J. Ballet, P. Bruel, T. H. Burnett, B. Lott, Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Release 4 (4FGL-DR4) (7 2023).arXiv:2307.12546

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Ackermann, et al., Search for dark matter satellites usingfermi-lat, The Astrophysical Journal 747 (2) (2012) 121.doi:10.1088/0004-637x/747/2/121

    M. Ackermann, et al., Search for dark matter satellites usingfermi-lat, The Astrophysical Journal 747 (2) (2012) 121.doi:10.1088/0004-637x/747/2/121. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/ 747/2/121

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/747/2/121 2012

  5. [5]

    Coronado-Blazquez, M

    J. Coronado-Blazquez, M. A. Sanchez-Conde, A. Dominguez, A. Aguirre-Santaella, M. Di Mauro, N. Mirabal, D. Nieto, E. Charles, Unidentified Gamma-ray Sources as Targets for Indirect Dark 8 Matter Detection with the Fermi-Large Area Tele- scope, JCAP 07 (2019) 020.arXiv:1906.11896, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/020

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/020 2019

  6. [6]

    Coronado-Blázquez, M

    J. Coronado-Blázquez, M. A. Sánchez-Conde, M. Di Mauro, A. Aguirre-Santaella, I. Ciuc ˘a, A. Domínguez, D. Kawata, N. Mirabal, Spectral and spatial analysis of the dark matter subhalo candi- dates amongFermiLarge Area Telescope unidentified sources, JCAP 11 (2019) 045.arXiv:1910.14429, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/045

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/11/045 2019

  7. [8]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, J. Silk, Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints, Physics Reports 405 (5–6) (2005) 279–390. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep. 2004.08.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 2005

  8. [9]

    2018, Rev

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, History of dark matter, Reviews of Modern Physics 90 (4) (Oct. 2018). doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys. 90.045002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 2018

  9. [10]

    Balazs, T

    C. Balazs, T. Bringmann, F. Kahlhoefer, M. White, A Primer on Dark Matter (11 2024).arXiv:2411.05062

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [11]

    Ajello, et al., Fermi-lat observations of high- energy gamma-ray emission toward the galactic cen- ter, The Astrophysical Journal 819 (1) (2016) 44

    M. Ajello, et al., Fermi-lat observations of high- energy gamma-ray emission toward the galactic cen- ter, The Astrophysical Journal 819 (1) (2016) 44. doi:10.3847/0004-637x/819/1/44. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/ 819/1/44

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/819/1/44 2016

  11. [12]

    Ackermann, et al., The fermi galactic cen- ter gev excess and implications for dark mat- ter, The Astrophysical Journal 840 (1) (2017) 43

    M. Ackermann, et al., The fermi galactic cen- ter gev excess and implications for dark mat- ter, The Astrophysical Journal 840 (1) (2017) 43. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6cab. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ aa6cab

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6cab 2017

  12. [13]

    Di Mauro, Characteristics of the galactic center excess measured with 11 years of fermi-lat data, Physical Review D 103 (6) (Mar

    M. Di Mauro, Characteristics of the galactic center excess measured with 11 years of fermi-lat data, Physical Review D 103 (6) (Mar. 2021).doi:10.1103/physrevd.103. 063029. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103. 063029

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103 2021

  13. [14]

    Ackermann, et al., Search for extended gamma-ray emission from the virgo galaxy cluster with fermi- lat, The Astrophysical Journal 812 (2) (2015) 159

    M. Ackermann, et al., Search for extended gamma-ray emission from the virgo galaxy cluster with fermi- lat, The Astrophysical Journal 812 (2) (2015) 159. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/2/159. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/ 812/2/159

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/2/159 2015

  14. [15]

    Di Mauro, J

    M. Di Mauro, J. Pérez-Romero, M. A. Sánchez-Conde, N. Fornengo, Constraining the dark matter contribution of gamma rays in clusters of galaxies using fermi-lat data, Physical Review D 107 (8) (Apr. 2023).doi:10.1103/ physrevd.107.083030. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107. 083030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107 2023

  15. [16]

    Ackermann, et al., Searching for Dark Matter Annihi- lation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi Large Area Telescope Data, Phys

    M. Ackermann, et al., Searching for Dark Matter Annihi- lation from Milky Way Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies with Six Years of Fermi Large Area Telescope Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (23) (2015) 231301.arXiv:1503.02641, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.231301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.231301 2015

  16. [17]

    Armand, E

    C. Armand, E. Charles, M. di Mauro, C. Giuri, J. P. Harding, D. Kerszberg, T. Miener, E. Moulin, L. Oakes, V . Poireau, E. Pueschel, J. Rico, L. Rinchiuso, D. Salazar- Gallegos, K. Tollefson, B. Zitzer, Combined dark matter searches towards dwarf spheroidal galaxies with fermi- lat, hawc, h.e.s.s., magic, and veritas (2021).arXiv: 2108.13646. URLhttps://a...

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [18]

    , Phys.Rev.D 109 (2024) 063024 [arXiv:2311.04982]. [585]H.E.S.S.Collaboration,\Search for Photon-Linelike Sig- natures from Dark Matter Annihilations with H.E.S.S

    A. McDaniel, M. Ajello, C. M. Karwin, M. D. Mauro, A. Drlica-Wagner, M. A. Sanchez-Conde, Legacy analy- sis of dark matter annihilation from the milky way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with 14 years of fermi-lat data (2023). arXiv:2311.04982. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04982

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [19]

    Abdollahi, et al., Combined dark matter search to- wards dwarf spheroidal galaxies with Fermi-LAT, HAWC, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, and VERITAS (8 2025).arXiv: 2508.20229

    S. Abdollahi, et al., Combined dark matter search to- wards dwarf spheroidal galaxies with Fermi-LAT, HAWC, H.E.S.S., MAGIC, and VERITAS (8 2025).arXiv: 2508.20229

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [22]

    Incremental Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog

    S. Abdollahi, et al., Incremental Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog, Astrophys. J. Supp. 260 (2) (2022) 53.arXiv:2201.11184,doi:10.3847/ 1538-4365/ac6751

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [23]

    A. A. Abdo, et al., Pulsed Gamma Rays from the Mil- lisecond Pulsar J0030+0451 with the Fermi Large Area Telescope, apj 699 (2) (2009) 1171–1177.arXiv:0904. 4377,doi:10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1171

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/699/2/1171 2009

  21. [24]

    Aharonian, A

    L. Struder, et al., The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The pn-CCD camera, Astron. Astro- phys. 365 (2001) L18–26.doi:10.1051/0004-6361: 20000066

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361: 2001

  22. [25]

    M. J. L. Turner, et al., The European Photon Imag- ing Camera on XMM-Newton: The MOS cameras, As- tron. Astrophys. 365 (2001) L27–35.arXiv:astro-ph/ 0011498,doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000087

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000087 2001

  23. [26]

    D. N. Burrows, et al., The Swift X-ray Telescope, Space Sci. Rev. 120 (2005) 165.arXiv:astro-ph/0508071, doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2

    work page Pith review doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2 2005

  24. [27]

    Elvis, et al., The Chandra COSMOS Survey, I: 9 Overview and Point Source Catalog, Astrophys

    M. Elvis, et al., The Chandra COSMOS Survey, I: 9 Overview and Point Source Catalog, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 184 (2009) 158–171.arXiv:0903.2062,doi:10. 1088/0067-0049/184/1/158

    work page arXiv 2009

  25. [28]

    Salvetti, R

    D. Salvetti, R. P. Mignani, A. De Luca, M. Marelli, C. Pal- lanca, A. A. Breeveld, A. Belfiore, W. Becker, J. Greiner, P. Hüsemann, A multiwavelength investigation of candi- date millisecond pulsars in unassociatedγ-ray sources, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470 (1) (2017) 466–480. arXiv:1702.00474,doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1247

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1247 2017

  26. [30]

    Ackermann, et al., 2FHL: The Second Catalog of Hard Fermi-LAT Sources, Astrophys

    M. Ackermann, et al., 2FHL: The Second Catalog of Hard Fermi-LAT Sources, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 222 (1) (2016) 5.arXiv:1508.04449,doi:10.3847/0067-0049/ 222/1/5

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/ 2016

  27. [32]

    Acero, et al., Fermi Large Area Telescope Third Source Catalog, Astrophys

    F. Acero, et al., Fermi Large Area Telescope Third Source Catalog, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 218 (2) (2015) 23.arXiv: 1501.02003,doi:10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/23

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/23 2015

  28. [33]

    H. A. Peña-Herazo, et al., Optical Spectroscopic Obser- vations of Gamma-Ray Blazar Candidates. VII. Follow- up Campaign in the Southern Hemisphere, Astrophys. Space Sci. 362 (2017) 228.arXiv:1903.10014,doi: 10.1007/s10509-017-3208-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-017-3208-7 2017

  29. [34]

    Massaro, R

    F. Massaro, R. D’Abrusco, G. Tosti, M. Ajello, A. Paggi, D. Gasparrini, Unidentifed gamma-ray sources: hunting gamma-ray blazars, Astrophys. J. 752 (2012) 61.arXiv: 1203.3801,doi:10.1088/0004-637X/752/1/61

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/752/1/61 2012

  30. [35]

    Summary of the content and survey properties

    Gaia Collaboration, A. Vallenari, A. G. A. Brown, T. Prusti, et al., Gaia Data Release 3: Summary of the content and survey properties, Astronomy & Astrophysics 674 (2023) A1.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 2023

  31. [36]

    Braglia, R

    C. Braglia, R. P. Mignani, A. Belfiore, M. Marelli, G. L. Israel, G. Novara, A. De Luca, A. Tiengo, P. M. Saz Parkinson, A multiwavelength search for black widow and redback counterparts of candidateγ-ray mil- lisecond pulsars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 497 (4) (2020) 5364–5382.arXiv:2007.00442,doi:10.1093/ mnras/staa2339

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [38]

    Balazs, T

    C. Balazs, T. Bringmann, F. Kahlhoefer, M. White, A primer on dark matter, Elsevier, 2026, p. 17–32. doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21439-4.00070-5. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-443-21439-4.00070-5

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-21439-4.00070-5 2026

  33. [39]

    N. F. Bell, J. B. Dent, B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, J. Ku- mar, J. L. Newstead, I. M. Shoemaker, Cosmic-ray up- scattered inelastic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 104 (7) (2021) 076020.arXiv:2108.00583,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.076020

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [40]

    Agashe, Y

    K. Agashe, Y . Cui, L. Necib, J. Thaler, (in)direct detection of boosted dark matter, JCAP (10) (2014) 062.arXiv: 1405.7370,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/062

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/062 2014

  35. [41]

    M. Wood, R. Caputo, E. Charles, M. Di Mauro, J. Magill, J. Perkins, Fermipy: An open-source Python package for analysis of Fermi-LAT Data, PoS ICRC2017 (2018) 824. arXiv:1707.09551,doi:10.22323/1.301.0824

    work page doi:10.22323/1.301.0824 2018

  36. [42]

    Atwood, et al., Pass 8: Toward the Full Realization of the Fermi-LAT Scientific Potential, 2013.arXiv:1303

    W. Atwood, et al., Pass 8: Toward the Full Realization of the Fermi-LAT Scientific Potential, 2013.arXiv:1303. 3514

    2013

  37. [43]

    H., Digel, S

    P. Bruel, T. H. Burnett, S. W. Digel, G. Johannesson, N. Omodei, M. Wood, Fermi-LAT improved Pass~8 event selection, in: 8th International Fermi Symposium: Cele- brating 10 Year of Fermi, 2018.arXiv:1810.11394

    work page arXiv 2018

  38. [44]

    Chernoff, On the distribution of the likelihood ratio, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 25 (3) (1954) 573– 578

    H. Chernoff, On the distribution of the likelihood ratio, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 25 (3) (1954) 573– 578. URLhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2236839

    work page arXiv 1954

  39. [45]

    Bertoni, D

    B. Bertoni, D. Hooper, T. Linden, Is The Gamma-Ray Source 3FGL J2212.5+0703 A Dark Matter Subhalo?, JCAP 05 (2016) 049.arXiv:1602.07303,doi:10. 1088/1475-7516/2016/05/049

    work page arXiv 2016

  40. [46]

    T.-L. Chou, D. Tanoglidis, D. Hooper, Resolving dark matter subhalos with future sub-gev gamma-ray tele- scopes (2017).arXiv:1709.08562. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1709.08562

    work page arXiv 2017

  41. [47]

    M. Ackermann, et al., The search for spatial extension in high-latitude sources detected by the fermi large area telescope, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 237 (2) (2018) 32.doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aacdf7. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ aacdf7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aacdf7 2018

  42. [48]

    Aguirre-Santaella and M.A

    A. Aguirre-Santaella, M. A. Sánchez-Conde, The viabil- ity of low-mass subhaloes as targets for gamma-ray dark matter searches, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 530 (3) (2024) 2496–2511.arXiv:2309.02330,doi:10.1093/ mnras/stae940

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [49]

    Coronado-Blázquez, M

    J. Coronado-Blázquez, M. A. Sánchez-Conde, J. Pérez- Romero, A. Aguirre-Santaella, Spatial extension of dark subhalos as seen by fermi-lat and the implications for wimp constraints, Physical Review D 105 (8) (Apr. 2022). doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.083006. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105. 083006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.083006 2022

  44. [50]

    Bertone, The moment of truth for WIMP Dark Matter, Nature 468 (2010) 389–393.arXiv:1011.3532,doi: 10.1038/nature09509

    G. Bertone, The moment of truth for WIMP Dark Matter, Nature 468 (2010) 389–393.arXiv:1011.3532,doi: 10.1038/nature09509

    work page doi:10.1038/nature09509 2010

  45. [51]

    Kilian, T

    G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y . Mambrini, J. P. Neto, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, F. S. Queiroz, The Waning of the WIMP: Endgame?, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2) (2025) 152.arXiv:2403.15860,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-024-13672-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2025

  46. [52]

    Mirabal, E

    N. Mirabal, E. Charles, E. C. Ferrara, P. L. Gonthier, A. K. Harding, M. A. Sánchez-Conde, D. J. Thompson, 3FGL Demographics Outside the Galactic Plane using Super- 10 vised Machine Learning: Pulsar and Dark Matter Subhalo Interpretations, Astrophys. J. 825 (1) (2016) 69.arXiv: 1605.00711,doi:10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/69

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/69 2016

  47. [53]

    Modeling Extragalactic Foregrounds and Secondaries for Un- biased Estimation of Cosmological Parameters from Primary Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy

    M. Ackermann, et al., Search for Dark Matter Satel- lites using the FERMI-LAT, Astrophys. J. 747 (2012) 121.arXiv:1201.2691,doi:10.1088/0004-637X/ 747/2/121

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/ 2012

  48. [54]

    Abdollahi, et al.,FermiLarge Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog, Astrophys

    S. Abdollahi, et al.,FermiLarge Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 247 (1) (2020) 33.arXiv:1902.10045,doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ ab6bcb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ 2020

  49. [55]

    Gammaldi, B

    V . Gammaldi, B. Zaldívar, M. A. Sánchez-Conde, J. Coronado-Blázquez, A search for dark matter among Fermi-LAT unidentified sources with systematic features in machine learning, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 520 (1) (2023) 1348–1361.arXiv:2207.09307,doi:10.1093/ mnras/stad066

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [56]

    C. J. Clark, et al., The TRAPUM L-band survey for pul- sars in Fermi-LAT gamma-ray sources, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 519 (4) (2023) 5590–5606.arXiv:2212. 08528,doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3742

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3742 2023

  51. [57]

    Mbarek and D

    J. Wu, et al., The Einstein@Home Gamma-ray Pulsar Sur- vey. II. Source Selection, Spectral Analysis, and Mul- tiwavelength Follow-up, Astrophys. J. 854 (2) (2018) 99.arXiv:1712.05395,doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ aaa411

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ 2018

  52. [58]

    Pathania, K

    A. Pathania, K. K. Singh, S. K. Singh, A. Tolamatti, B. B. Singh, K. K. Yadav, Identification of gamma ray pulsar candidates in the Fermi-LAT 4FGL-DR4 unasso- ciated sources using supervised machine learning, As- tropart. Phys. 175 (2026) 103185.arXiv:2510.08654, doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2025.103185

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2025.103185 2026

  53. [59]

    R. N. Manchester, Millisecond Pulsars, their Evo- lution and Applications, J. Astrophys. Astron. 38 (2017) 42.arXiv:1709.09434,doi:10.1007/ s12036-017-9469-2

    work page arXiv 2017

  54. [60]

    Crawford, M

    F. Crawford, M. McLaughlin, S. Johnston, R. Romani, E. Sorrelgreen, A search for radio emission from the young 16-ms x-ray pulsar psr j0537-6910, Advances in Space Research 35 (1181) (2005) 1181–1184.doi:10. 1016/j.asr.2005.03.074

    2005

  55. [61]

    D. A. Smith, et al., The Third Fermi Large Area Tele- scope Catalog of Gamma-Ray Pulsars, Astrophys. J. 958 (2) (2023) 191.arXiv:2307.11132,doi:10.3847/ 1538-4357/acee67

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [62]

    A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19, 716–723 (1974)

    H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identifica- tion, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19 (6) (1974) 716– 723.doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

    work page doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 1974

  57. [63]

    Algeri, J

    S. Algeri, J. Conrad, D. A. van Dyk, A method for comparing non-nested models with application to astro- physical searches for new physics, mnras 458 (1) (2016) L84–L88.arXiv:1509.01010,doi:10.1093/mnrasl/ slw025

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/ 2016

  58. [64]

    K. P. Burnham, D. R. Anderson, Multimodel inference: Understanding aic and bic in model selection, Sociolog- ical Methods & Research 33 (2) (2004) 261–304.doi: 10.1177/0049124104268644

    work page doi:10.1177/0049124104268644 2004

  59. [65]

    T. E. Jeltema, S. Profumo, Fitting the Gamma-Ray Spec- trum from Dark Matter with DMFIT: GLAST and the Galactic Center Region, JCAP 11 (2008) 003.arXiv: 0808.2641,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/11/003

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/11/003 2008

  60. [66]

    Arina, M

    C. Arina, M. D. Mauro, N. Fornengo, J. Heisig, A. Jueid, R. R. de Austri, Cosmixs: Cosmic messenger spectra for indirect dark matter searches (2023).arXiv:2312. 01153. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01153

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [67]

    M., Crawford, T

    P. De la Torre Luque, M. W. Winkler, T. Linden, Antipro- ton bounds on dark matter annihilation from a combined analysis using the DRAGON2 code, JCAP 05 (2024) 104.arXiv:2401.10329,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2024/05/104

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2024

  62. [68]

    Cermeño, M

    M. Cermeño, M. A. Pérez-García, Gamma rays from dark mediators in white dwarfs, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 063002.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.063002. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.98.063002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.063002 2018

  63. [69]

    Herrero, M

    A. Herrero, M. A. Pérez-García, J. Silk, C. Al- bertus, Dark matter and bubble nucleation in old neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 103019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.103019. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.100.103019 11

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.103019 2019